PCLake

PCLake is a dynamic, mathematical model used to study eutrophication effects in shallow lakes and ponds. PCLake models explicitly the most important biotic groups and their interrelations, within the general framework of nutrient cycles. PCLake is used both by scientist and water managers. PCLake is in 2019 extended to PCLake+[1] which can be applied to stratifying lakes.

Background

Typically, shallow lakes are in one of two contrasting alternative stable states:[2] a clear state with submerged macrophytes and piscivorous fish, or a turbid state dominated by phytoplankton and benthivorous fish. A switch from one state to the other is largely driven by the input of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) to the ecosystem.[3] If the nutrient loading exceeds a critical value, eutrophication causes a switch from the clear to the turbid state. As a result of urban water pollution and/or intensive agriculture in catchment areas, many of the world’s shallow lakes and ponds are in a eutrophic state with turbid waters and poor ecological quality. In this turbid state, the lake also becomes subject to algal blooms of toxic cyanobacteria (also called blue-green algae). Recovery of the clear state however is difficult as the critical nutrient loading for the switch back is often found to be lower than the critical loading towards the turbid state. Lowering the nutrient input thus does not automatically lead to a switch back to the clear water phase. Hence, the system shows hysteresis.

Application

PCLake is designed to study the effects of eutrophication on shallow lakes and ponds.[4] On one hand, the model is used by scientists to study the general behavior of these ecosystems. For example, PCLake is used to understand the phenomena of alternative stable states and hysteresis, and in that light, the relative importance of lake features such as water depth or fetch length.[5] Also the potential effects of climate warming for shallow lakes have been studied.[6] On the other hand, PCLake is applied by lake water resource managers that consider the turbid state as undesirable. They can use the model to define the critical loadings for their specific lakes and evaluate the effectiveness of restoration measures. For this purpose also a meta-model has been developed.[7] The meta-model can be used by water managers to derive an estimate of the critical loading values for a certain lake based on only a few important parameters, without the need of running the full dynamical model.[8]

Lakes that have been simulated using PCLake
nr Lake name Country Depth (m) Lake Area (km2)
1 Hollands-Ankeveen[9] Netherlands 1.3 0.85
2 Bergse Achterplas[9] Netherlands 2.0 0.41
3 Bergse Voorplas[9] Netherlands 2.0 0.60
4 Beulakerwijde[9] Netherlands 1.8 13.00
5 Botshol, Grote Wije[9] Netherlands 2.0 0.53
6 Kaag, Norremeer[9] Netherlands 2.4 3.20
7 Langeraar, Geerplas[9] Netherlands 1.9 0.28
8 Loosdrecht[9] Netherlands 2.2 9.40
9 Naarden, Grote Meer[9] Netherlands 1.3 1.70
10 Naarden, Wijde Blik[9] Netherlands 1.0 0.38
11 Reeuwijk, Nieuwenbroek[9] Netherlands 1.8 1.04
12 Nieuwkoop, Noordeinder[9] Netherlands 3.0 1.50
13 Nieuwkoop, Zuideinder[9] Netherlands 3.0 1.00
14 Reeuwijk, Elfhoeven[9] Netherlands 2.0 1.09
15 Westeinderplassen[9] Netherlands 2.8 8.52
16 Zuidlaardermeer[9] Netherlands 1.0 6.00
17 Nannewijd[9] Netherlands 1.0 1.00
18 Blankaart[9] Belgium 1.0 0.30
19 Maten 13[9] Belgium 0.8 0.03
20 Visvijver[9] Belgium 0.8 0.01
21 Gara, South[9] Ireland 1.0 2.03
22 Maumwee[9] Ireland 2.0 0.27
23 Mullagh[9] Ireland 2.3 0.35
24 Pollaphuca[9] Ireland 6.8 19.74
25 Ramor[9] Ireland 3.0 7.41
26 Luknajno[9] Poland 1.8 6.30
27 Waalboezem[9] Netherlands 3.8 0.78
28 Binnenbedijkte Maas[9] Netherlands 4.0 1.58
29 Brielse Meer[9] Netherlands 5.5 4.91
30 Volkerak[9] Netherlands 5.0 45.70
31 Zoommeer[9] Netherlands 6.0 15.80
32 Oude Venen 2[9] Netherlands 1.3 0.10
33 Veluwemeer[9] Netherlands 1.6 32.40
34 Wolderwijd[9] Netherlands 1.9 18.00
35 Nuldernauw[9] Netherlands 2.1 8.70
36 Drontermeer[9] Netherlands 1.3 5.40
37 Braassemermeer[9] Netherlands 3.9 4.52
38 Langeraar, Noordeinde[9] Netherlands 1.9 0.75
39 Mooie Nel[9] Netherlands 4.5 1.16
40 Het Hol[9] Netherlands 1.0 0.30
41 Kortenhoef[9] Netherlands 1.2 1.93
42 Stichts-Ankeveen[9] Netherlands 1.0 1.00
43 Frisian Lakes (average)[9] Netherlands 1.4 5.18
44 Enso[9] Denmark 1.9 0.11
45 Nederso[9] Denmark 1.6 0.14
46 Soby[9] Denmark 3.0 0.72
47 Hinge[9] Denmark 1.2 0.91
48 Kvind[9] Denmark 1.9 0.15
49 Lading[9] Denmark 1.0 0.45
50 Silkeborg-Langso[9] Denmark 2.0 0.46
51 Honda[9] Spain 1.0 0.09
52 Nueva[9] Spain 1.5 0.27
53 Botshol Kleine Wije[9] Spain 1.7 0.21
54 Taihu[10] China 1.9 2250
55 Dianchi[11] China 4.4 298
56 Chaohu[12] China 2.5 760

Model content

Mathematically, PCLake is composed of a set of coupled differential equations. With a large number of state variables (>100) and parameters (>300), the model may be characterized as relatively complex. The main biotic variables are phytoplankton and submerged aquatic vegetation, describing primary production. A simplified food web is made up of zooplankton, zoobenthos, young and adult whitefish and piscivorous fish. The main abiotic factors are transparency and the nutrients phosphorus (P), nitrogen (N) and silica (Si). At the base of the model are the water and nutrient budgets (in- and outflow). The model describes a completely mixed water body and comprises both the water column and the upper sediment layer. The overall nutrient cycles for N, P and Si are described as completely closed (except for in- and outflow and denitrification). Inputs to the model are: lake hydrology, nutrient loading, dimensions and sediment characteristics. The model calculates chlorophyll-a, transparency, cyanobacteria, vegetation cover and fish biomass, as well as the concentrations and fluxes of nutrients N, P and Si, and oxygen. Optionally, a wetland zone with marsh vegetation and water exchange with the lake can be included.

PCLake is calibrated against nutrient, transparency, chlorophyll and vegetation data on more than 40 European (but mainly Dutch) lakes, and systematic sensitivity and uncertainty analysis have been performed.[13] Although PCLake is primarily used for Dutch lakes, it is likely that the model is also applicable to comparable non-stratifying lakes in other regions, if parameters are adjusted or some small changes to the model are made.

Model development

The first version of PCLake (by then called PCLoos) was built in the early 1990s at the Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), within the framework of a research and restoration project on Lake Loosdrecht. It has been extended and improved since then. Parallel to PCLake, PCDitch was created, which is an ecosystem model for ditches and other linear water bodies. The models were further developed by dr. Jan H. Janse and colleagues at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), formerly part of the RIVM. Since 2009, the model is jointly owned by PBL and the Netherlands Institute of Ecology, where further development and application of PCLake is taking place, related to aquatic-ecological research.

See also

References
  1. Janssen, Annette B. G.; Teurlincx, Sven; Beusen, Arthur H. W.; Huijbregts, Mark A. J.; Rost, Jasmijn; Schipper, Aafke M.; Seelen, Laura M. S.; Mooij, Wolf M.; Janse, Jan H. (2019-03-24). "PCLake+: A process-based ecological model to assess the trophic state of stratified and non-stratified freshwater lakes worldwide". Ecological Modelling. 396: 23–32. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.01.006. ISSN 0304-3800.
  2. Scheffer M, 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8: 275–-279
  3. Janse JH, 1997. A model of nutrient dynamics in shallow lakes in relation to multiple stable states. Hydrobiologia 342/343: 1–8
  4. Janse JH, 2005. Model studies on the eutrophication of shallow lakes and ditches. PhD thesis. Wageningen University
  5. Janse JH and others, 2008. Critical phosphorus loading of different types of shallow lakes and the consequences for management estimated with the ecosystem model PCLake. Limnologica 38: 2003–2019
  6. Mooij WM and others, 2007. Predicting the effect of climate change on temperate shallow lakes with the ecosystem model PCLake. Hydrobiologia 584: 443–454
  7. http://themasites.pbl.nl/modellen/pclake/
  8. Schep, S. (in Dutch) 2010. Neuraal netwerk PCLake ten behoeve van KRW-verkenner. Witteveen+Bos; rapportnr. UT565-2-1
  9. Janse, Jan (2008). "Critical phosphorus loading of different types of shallow lakes and the consequences for management estimated with the ecosystem model PCLake". Imnologica-Ecology and Management of Inland Waters. 38 (3–4): 203–219. doi:10.1016/j.limno.2008.06.001.
  10. Janssen, Annette B. G. (2017). "Spatial identification of critical nutrient loads of large shallow lakes: Implications for Lake Taihu (China)". Water Research. 119: 276–287. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.045.
  11. Li, Dianchi (2019). "Modeling nutrients in Lake Dianchi (China) and its watershed". Agricultural Water Management. 212: 48–59. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2018.08.023.
  12. Kong, Xiangzhen (2016). "Hydrological regulation drives regime shifts: evidence from paleolimnology and ecosystem modeling of a large shallow Chinese lake". Global Change Biology. 23 (2): 737–754. doi:10.1111/gcb.13416.
  13. Janse JH and others, 2010. Estimating the critical phosphorus loading of shallow lakes with the ecosystem model PCLake: sensitivity, calibration and uncertainty. Ecological Modelling 221: 654–665
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.