Philip Kitcher

Philip Stuart Kitcher (born 20 February 1947) is a British philosophy professor teaching at Columbia University who specialises in the philosophy of science, the philosophy of biology, the philosophy of mathematics, the philosophy of literature, and more recently pragmatism.

Philip Kitcher
Born20 February 1947 (age 73)
London, England
NationalityUnited Kingdom
EducationChrist's College, University of Cambridge (B.A.); Princeton University (PhD)
AwardsLifetime Achievement Award (American Psychological Association)
Distinguished Contribution Award (American Psychological Association)
Lakatos Award
Prometheus Prize (American Philosophical Association)
Lannan Notable Book Award
EraContemporary philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolAnalytic philosophy
Pragmatism
Doctoral advisorCarl Hempel
Doctoral studentsPeter Godfrey-Smith, Kyle Stanford, Michael Dietrich
Main interests
Philosophy of science, philosophy of biology, bioethics, philosophy of mathematics
Notable ideas
The distinction the presuppositional posits and the working posits of a theory[1]
Heterogeneous reference potentials[2] (selective realism)[3]

Life and career

Born in London, Kitcher spent his early life in Eastbourne, East Sussex, on the south coast of the United Kingdom. He went to school at Christ's Hospital, Horsham, West Sussex.[4][5] He earned his B.A. in Mathematics/History and Philosophy of Science from Christ's College, Cambridge in 1969, and his PhD in History and Philosophy of Science from Princeton University in 1974, where he worked closely with Carl Hempel and Thomas Kuhn.

Kitcher currently teaches at Columbia University in the Department of Philosophy where he holds an appointment as the John Dewey Professor of Philosophy. As chair of Columbia's Contemporary Civilization program (part of its undergraduate Core Curriculum), he also holds the James R. Barker Professorship of Contemporary Civilization. Before moving to Columbia, Kitcher taught at the University of Vermont, Vassar College, The University of Minnesota, University of Michigan, and for several years at University of California, San Diego where he held the position of Presidential Professor of Philosophy.

Kitcher is past president of the American Philosophical Association. In 2002, Kitcher was named a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and he was awarded the inaugural Prometheus Prize from the American Philosophical Association in 2006 in honour of extended achievement in the philosophy of science. He was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 2018.[6]

Kitcher was Editor-in-Chief of the journal Philosophy of Science from 1994-1999, was also a member of the NIH/DOE Working Group on the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of the Human Genome Project from 1995 to 1997.

He has trained a number of prominent philosophers of science, including Peter Godfrey-Smith (University of Sydney), Kyle Stanford (University of California, Irvine), and Michael R. Dietrich (University of Pittsburgh). He also taught C. Kenneth Waters (University of Calgary) and Michael Weisberg (University of Pennsylvania) as undergraduates.

He is married to Patricia Kitcher. She is a well known Kant scholar and philosopher of mind who has been the Mark Van Doren Professor of Humanities at Columbia.

Philosophical work

Within philosophy, Kitcher is best known for his work in philosophy of biology, science, and mathematics, and outside academia for his work examining creationism and sociobiology. His works attempt to connect the questions raised in philosophy of biology and philosophy of mathematics with the central philosophical issues of epistemology, metaphysics, and ethics. He has also published papers on John Stuart Mill, Kant and other figures in the history of philosophy. His 2012 book[7] documented his developing interest in John Dewey and a pragmatic approach to philosophical issues. He sees pragmatism as providing a unifying and reconstructive approach to traditional philosophy issues. He had, a year earlier, published a book outlining a naturalistic approach to ethics, The Ethical Project (Harvard University Press, 2011).[8] He has also done work on the philosophy of climate change.[9][10]

Criteria for what constitutes 'good science'

Kitcher's three criteria for good science are:[11]

1. Independent testability of auxiliary hypotheses
"An auxiliary hypothesis ought to be testable independently of the particular problem it is introduced to solve, independently of the theory it is designed to save" (e.g. the evidence for the existence of Neptune is independent of the anomalies in Uranus's orbit).
2. Unification
"A science should be unified .... Good theories consist of just one problem-solving strategy, or a small family of problem-solving strategies, that can be applied to a wide range of problems".
3. Fecundity
"A great scientific theory, like Newton's, opens up new areas of research... Because a theory presents a new way of looking at the world, it can lead us to ask new questions, and so to embark on new and fruitful lines of inquiry... Typically, a flourishing science is incomplete. At any time, it raises more questions than it can currently answer. But incompleteness is no vice. On the contrary, incompleteness is the mother of fecundity... A good theory should be productive; it should raise new questions and presume that those questions can be answered without giving up its problem-solving strategies".

He increasingly recognised the role of values in practical decisions about scientific research[12]

Kuhn and creationism

Kitcher is the author of Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. He has commented on the way creationists have misinterpreted Kuhn:

Thomas Kuhn's book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has probably been more widely read—and more widely misinterpreted—than any other book in the recent philosophy of science. The broad circulation of his views has generated a popular caricature of Kuhn's position. According to this popular caricature, scientists working in a field belong to a club. All club members are required to agree on main points of doctrine. Indeed, the price of admission is several years of graduate education, during which the chief dogmas are inculcated. The views of outsiders are ignored. Now I want to emphasize that this is a hopeless caricature, both of the practice of scientists and of Kuhn's analysis of the practice. Nevertheless, the caricature has become commonly accepted as a faithful representation, thereby lending support to the Creationists' claims that their views are arrogantly disregarded.[13]

Books
  • Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. MIT Press, 1982 (paperback 1983). ISBN 0-262-61037-X
  • The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press, 1983 (paperback 1984).
  • Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. MIT Press, 1985 (paperback 1987).
  • The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, April 1993 (paper January 1995).
  • The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities (Simon and Schuster [US], Penguin [UK], January 1996, paperback editions 1997). The American paperback contains a postscript on cloning, almost identical with his article "Whose Self is it, Anyway?”.
  • Patterns of Scientific Controversies, essay in Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives
  • Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 2001; paperback 2003. ISBN 0-19-516552-7
  • In Mendel's Mirror: Philosophical Reflections on Biology, Oxford University Press, 2003. (This is a collection of seventeen of his articles).
  • Finding an Ending: Reflections on Wagner’s Ring, co-authored with Richard Schacht, Oxford University Press, February 2004. ISBN 0-19-517359-7
  • Living with Darwin: Evolution, Design, and the Future of Faith, Oxford University Press, January 2007. ISBN 0-19-531444-1
  • Joyce's Kaleidoscope: An Invitation to Finnegans Wake, Oxford University Press, July 2007. ISBN 0-19-532103-0
  • The Ethical Project, Harvard University Press, October 2011. ISBN 0-67-406144-6
  • Science in a Democratic Society, Prometheus Books, September 2011. ISBN 1-61-614407-6
  • Preludes to Pragmatism: Toward a Reconstruction of Philosophy, Oxford University Press, 2012. ISBN 9780199899555.
  • Deaths in Venice: The Cases of Gustav von Aschenbach, Columbia University Press, November 2013. ISBN 978-0231162647
  • Life After Faith: The Case for Secular Humanism, Yale University Press, 2014. ISBN 9780300203431

References
  1. Martin Carrier, Johannes Roggenhofer, Günter Küppers, Philippe Blanchard (eds.), Knowledge and the World: Challenges Beyond the Science Wars, Springer, 2013, p. 149.
  2. Miriam Solomon, Social Empiricism, MIT Press, 2007, p. 37.
  3. Boaz Miller, "What is Hacking's Argument for Entity Realism?", Synthese 193(3):991–1006 (2016).
  4. "ACADEMIC AUTOBIOGRAPHY – PHILIP KITCHER". www.columbia.edu. Retrieved 8 November 2017.
  5. Kitcher, Philip (2007). Joyce's kaleidoscope : an invitation to Finnegans wake. New York: Oxford University Press. p. Dedication. ISBN 978-0195321029.
  6. "Election of New Members at the 2018 Spring Meeting"
  7. Kitcher, P. Preludes to Pragmatism: Toward a Reconstruction of Philosophy", Oxford University Press, 2012
  8. Mallon, R. Review of Kitcher, P. The Ethical Project, Harvard University Press, October 2011. ISBN 0-67-406144-6 (Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews)
  9. Kitcher, Philip (2010). "The Climate Change Debates" Science, 328(5983):pp.1230-1234
  10. Kitcher, Philip (March 25, 2015). "Climate Change: The Hard Problem" 'Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas-UNAM'
  11. pg 46-48 Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. MIT Press. 1982. ISBN 978-0262110853.
  12. Longino, Helen E. (2002), Science and the Common Good: Thoughts on Philip Kitcher’s Science, Truth, and Democracy, Philosophy of Science, 69, pp. 560–568 (PDF)
  13. Kitcher, P, 1982, Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism, p. 168
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.