Stevens v. Gladding

Stevens v. Gladding, 58 U.S. 447 (1854), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the copyright of a work is not attached to the physical copperplate used to print the work, so purchasing the copperplate does not purchase the copyright.[1]

Stevens v. Gladding
Decided December 1, 1854
Full case nameJames Stevens v. Royal Gladding and Isaac T. Proud
Citations58 U.S. 447 (more)
17 How. 447; 15 L. Ed. 155
Holding
The copyright of a work is not attached to the physical copperplate used to print the work, so purchasing the copperplate does not purchase the copyright.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Roger B. Taney
Associate Justices
John McLean · James M. Wayne
John Catron · Peter V. Daniel
Samuel Nelson · Robert C. Grier
Benjamin R. Curtis · John A. Campbell
Laws applied
Supplemental Copyright Act of 1819,
Copyright Act of 1831

It also applied a principle from English law that courts of equity could not award penalties and concluded that copyright infringement damages categorically could not be awarded by equity, as distinguished from legal actions under common law. This meant that copyright holders would be required to file separate lawsuits for injunctions against the continued printing of works created by them (equity) and for requesting retroactive payment from infringers (law). That procedural requirement remained in place until the federal courts merged the law and equity dockets in 1938.[2]

This case is closely related to Stephens v. Cady.[3]

References
  1. Stevens v. Gladding, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 447 (1854).
  2. Gómez-Arostegui, H. Tomás (2013). "What History Teaches Us About US Copyright Law and Statutory Damages". The WIPO Journal. 5: 76–86. SSRN 2380396.
  3. Stephens v. Cady, 55 U.S. (14 How.) 528 (1852).
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.