Galaxy formation and evolution

The study of galaxy formation and evolution is concerned with the processes that formed a heterogeneous universe from a homogeneous beginning, the formation of the first galaxies, the way galaxies change over time, and the processes that have generated the variety of structures observed in nearby galaxies. Galaxy formation is hypothesized to occur from structure formation theories, as a result of tiny quantum fluctuations in the aftermath of the Big Bang. The simplest model in general agreement with observed phenomena is the Lambda-CDM model—that is, that clustering and merging allows galaxies to accumulate mass, determining both their shape and structure.

Part of a series on
Physical cosmology
Early universe
Backgrounds
Expansion · Future
Components · Structure
Components
Structure
Experiments
Subject history
  •  Category
  •  Astronomy portal

Commonly observed properties of galaxies
Hubble tuning fork diagram of galaxy morphology

Because of the inability to conduct experiments in outer space, the only way to “test” theories and models of galaxy evolution is to compare them with observations. Explanations for how galaxies formed and evolved must be able to predict the observed properties and types of galaxies.

Edwin Hubble created the first galaxy classification scheme known as the Hubble tuning-fork diagram. It partitioned galaxies into ellipticals, normal spirals, barred spirals (such as the Milky Way), and irregulars. These galaxy types exhibit the following properties which can be explained by current galaxy evolution theories:

  • Many of the properties of galaxies (including the galaxy color–magnitude diagram) indicate that there are fundamentally two types of galaxies. These groups divide into blue star-forming galaxies that are more like spiral types, and red non-star forming galaxies that are more like elliptical galaxies.
  • Spiral galaxies are quite thin, dense, and rotate relatively fast, while the stars in elliptical galaxies have randomly oriented orbits.
  • The majority of giant galaxies contain a supermassive black hole in their centers, ranging in mass from millions to billions of times the mass of our Sun. The black hole mass is tied to the host galaxy bulge or spheroid mass.
  • Metallicity has a positive correlation with the absolute magnitude (luminosity) of a galaxy.

There is a common misconception that Hubble believed incorrectly that the tuning fork diagram described an evolutionary sequence for galaxies, from elliptical galaxies through lenticulars to spiral galaxies. This is not the case; instead, the tuning fork diagram shows an evolution from simple to complex with no temporal connotations intended.[1] Astronomers now believe that disk galaxies likely formed first, then evolved into elliptical galaxies through galaxy mergers.

Current models also predict that the majority of mass in galaxies is made up of dark matter, a substance which is not directly observable, and might not interact through any means except gravity. This observation arises because galaxies could not have formed as they have, or rotate as they are seen to, unless they contain far more mass than can be directly observed.

Formation of disk galaxies

The earliest stage in the evolution of galaxies is the formation. When a galaxy forms, it has a disk shape and is called a spiral galaxy due to spiral-like "arm" structures located on the disk. There are different theories on how these disk-like distributions of stars develop from a cloud of matter: however, at present, none of them exactly predicts the results of observation.

Top-down theories

Olin Eggen, Donald Lynden-Bell, and Allan Sandage[2] in 1962, proposed a theory that disk galaxies form through a monolithic collapse of a large gas cloud. The distribution of matter in the early universe was in clumps that consisted mostly of dark matter. These clumps interacted gravitationally, putting tidal torques on each other that acted to give them some angular momentum. As the baryonic matter cooled, it dissipated some energy and contracted toward the center. With angular momentum conserved, the matter near the center speeds up its rotation. Then, like a spinning ball of pizza dough, the matter forms into a tight disk. Once the disk cools, the gas is not gravitationally stable, so it cannot remain a singular homogeneous cloud. It breaks, and these smaller clouds of gas form stars. Since the dark matter does not dissipate as it only interacts gravitationally, it remains distributed outside the disk in what is known as the dark halo. Observations show that there are stars located outside the disk, which does not quite fit the "pizza dough" model. It was first proposed by Leonard Searle and Robert Zinn [3] that galaxies form by the coalescence of smaller progenitors. Known as a top-down formation scenario, this theory is quite simple yet no longer widely accepted.

Bottom-up theories

More recent theories include the clustering of dark matter halos in the bottom-up process. Instead of large gas clouds collapsing to form a galaxy in which the gas breaks up into smaller clouds, it is proposed that matter started out in these “smaller” clumps (mass on the order of globular clusters), and then many of these clumps merged to form galaxies,[4] which then were drawn by gravitation to form galaxy clusters. This still results in disk-like distributions of baryonic matter with dark matter forming the halo for all the same reasons as in the top-down theory. Models using this sort of process predict more small galaxies than large ones, which matches observations.

Astronomers do not currently know what process stops the contraction. In fact, theories of disk galaxy formation are not successful at producing the rotation speed and size of disk galaxies. It has been suggested that the radiation from bright newly formed stars, or from an active galactic nucleus can slow the contraction of a forming disk. It has also been suggested that the dark matter halo can pull the galaxy, thus stopping disk contraction.[5]

The Lambda-CDM model is a cosmological model that explains the formation of the universe after the Big Bang. It is a relatively simple model that predicts many properties observed in the universe, including the relative frequency of different galaxy types; however, it underestimates the number of thin disk galaxies in the universe.[6] The reason is that these galaxy formation models predict a large number of mergers. If disk galaxies merge with another galaxy of comparable mass (at least 15 percent of its mass) the merger will likely destroy, or at a minimum greatly disrupt the disk, and the resulting galaxy is not expected to be a disk galaxy (see next section). While this remains an unsolved problem for astronomers, it does not necessarily mean that the Lambda-CDM model is completely wrong, but rather that it requires further refinement to accurately reproduce the population of galaxies in the universe.

Galaxy mergers and the formation of elliptical galaxies
Artist image of a firestorm of star birth deep inside core of young, growing elliptical galaxy.
NGC 4676 (Mice Galaxies) is an example of a present merger.
Antennae Galaxies are a pair of colliding galaxies – the bright, blue knots are young stars that have recently ignited as a result of the merger.
ESO 325-G004, a typical elliptical galaxy.
Main article: Galaxy merger

Elliptical galaxies (such as IC 1101) are among some of the largest known thus far. Their stars are on orbits that are randomly oriented within the galaxy (i.e. they are not rotating like disk galaxies). A distinguishing feature of elliptical galaxies is that the velocity of the stars does not necessarily contribute to flattening of the galaxy, such as in spiral galaxies.[7] Elliptical galaxies have central supermassive black holes, and the masses of these black holes correlate with the galaxy's mass.

Elliptical galaxies have two main stages of evolution. The first is due to the supermassive black hole growing by accreting cooling gas. The second stage is marked by the black hole stabilizing by suppressing gas cooling, thus leaving the elliptical galaxy in a stable state.[8] The mass of the black hole is also correlated to a property called sigma which is the dispersion of the velocities of stars in their orbits. This relationship, known as the M-sigma relation, was discovered in 2000.[9] Elliptical galaxies mostly lack disks, although some bulges of disk galaxies resemble elliptical galaxies. Elliptical galaxies are more likely found in crowded regions of the universe (such as galaxy clusters).

Astronomers now see elliptical galaxies as some of the most evolved systems in the universe. It is widely accepted that the main driving force for the evolution of elliptical galaxies is mergers of smaller galaxies. Many galaxies in the universe are gravitationally bound to other galaxies, which means that they will never escape their mutual pull. If the galaxies are of similar size, the resultant galaxy will appear similar to neither of the progenitors,[10] but will instead be elliptical. There are many types of galaxy mergers, which do not necessarily result in elliptical galaxies, but result in a structural change. For example, a minor merger event is thought to be occurring between the Milky Way and the Magellanic Clouds.

Mergers between such large galaxies are regarded as violent, and the frictional interaction of the gas between the two galaxies can cause gravitational shock waves, which are capable of forming new stars in the new elliptical galaxy.[11] By sequencing several images of different galactic collisions, one can observe the timeline of two spiral galaxies merging into a single elliptical galaxy.[12]

In the Local Group, the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy are gravitationally bound, and currently approaching each other at high speed. Simulations show that the Milky Way and Andromeda are on a collision course, and are expected to collide in less than five billion years. During this collision, it is expected that the Sun and the rest of the Solar System will be ejected from its current path around the Milky Way. The remnant could be a giant elliptical galaxy.[13]

Galaxy quenching
Star formation in what are now "dead" galaxies sputtered out billions of years ago.[14]
Main article: Quenching (astronomy)

One observation (see above) that must be explained by a successful theory of galaxy evolution is the existence of two different populations of galaxies on the galaxy color-magnitude diagram. Most galaxies tend to fall into two separate locations on this diagram: a "red sequence" and a "blue cloud". Red sequence galaxies are generally non-star-forming elliptical galaxies with little gas and dust, while blue cloud galaxies tend to be dusty star-forming spiral galaxies.[15][16]

As described in previous sections, galaxies tend to evolve from spiral to elliptical structure via mergers. However, the current rate of galaxy mergers does not explain how all galaxies move from the "blue cloud" to the "red sequence". It also does not explain how star formation ceases in galaxies. Theories of galaxy evolution must therefore be able to explain how star formation turns off in galaxies. This phenomenon is called galaxy "quenching".[17]

Stars form out of cold gas (see also the Kennicutt-Schmidt law), so a galaxy is quenched when it has no more cold gas. However, it is thought that quenching occurs relatively quickly (within 1 billion years), which is much shorter than the time it would take for a galaxy to simply use up its reservoir of cold gas.[18][19] Galaxy evolution models explain this by hypothesizing other physical mechanisms that remove or shut off the supply of cold gas in a galaxy. These mechanisms can be broadly classified into two categories: (1) preventive feedback mechanisms that stop cold gas from entering a galaxy or stop it from producing stars, and (2) ejective feedback mechanisms that remove gas so that it cannot form stars.[20]

One theorized preventive mechanism called “strangulation” keeps cold gas from entering the galaxy. Strangulation is likely the main mechanism for quenching star formation in nearby low-mass galaxies.[21] The exact physical explanation for strangulation is still unknown, but it may have to do with a galaxy's interactions with other galaxies. As a galaxy falls into a galaxy cluster, gravitational interactions with other galaxies can strangle it by preventing it from accreting more gas.[22] For galaxies with massive dark matter halos, another preventive mechanism called “virial shock heating” may also prevent gas from becoming cool enough to form stars.[19]

Ejective processes, which expel cold gas from galaxies, may explain how more massive galaxies are quenched.[23] One ejective mechanism is caused by supermassive black holes found in the centers of galaxies. Simulations have shown that gas accreting onto supermassive black holes in galactic centers produces high-energy jets; the released energy can expel enough cold gas to quench star formation.[24]

Our own Milky Way and the nearby Andromeda Galaxy currently appear to be undergoing the quenching transition from star-forming blue galaxies to passive red galaxies.[25]

  • NGC 3610 shows some structure in the form of a bright disc, implying that it formed only a short time ago.[26]
  • NGC 891, a very thin disk galaxy
  • An image of Messier 101, a prototypical spiral galaxy seen face-on
  • A spiral galaxy, ESO 510-G13, was warped as a result of colliding with another galaxy. After the other galaxy is completely absorbed, the distortion will disappear. The process typically takes millions if not billions of years.

See also

Further reading
  • Mo, Houjun; van den Bosch, Frank; White, Simon (June 2010), Galaxy Formation and Evolution (1 ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0521857932

References
  1. Hubble, Edwin P. "Extragalactic nebulae." The Astrophysical Journal 64 (1926).
  2. Eggen, O. J.; Lynden-Bell, D.; Sandage, A. R. (1962). "Evidence from the motions of old stars that the Galaxy collapsed". The Astrophysical Journal. 136: 748. Bibcode:1962ApJ...136..748E. doi:10.1086/147433.
  3. Searle, L.; Zinn, R. (1978). "Compositions of halo clusters and the formation of the galactic halo". The Astrophysical Journal. 225: 357–379. Bibcode:1978ApJ...225..357S. doi:10.1086/156499.
  4. White, Simon; Rees, Martin (1978). "Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering". MNRAS. 183 (3): 341–358. Bibcode:1978MNRAS.183..341W. doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341.
  5. Christensen, L.L.; de Martin, D.; Shida, R.Y. (2009). Cosmic Collisions: The Hubble Atlas of Merging Galaxies. Springer. ISBN 9780387938530.
  6. Steinmetz, Matthias; Navarro, Julio F. (1 June 2002). "The hierarchical origin of galaxy morphologies". New Astronomy. 7 (4): 155–160. arXiv:astro-ph/0202466. Bibcode:2002NewA....7..155S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.20.7981. doi:10.1016/S1384-1076(02)00102-1.
  7. Kim, Dong-Woo (2012). Hot Interstellar Matter in Elliptical Galaxies. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-1-4614-0579-5.
  8. Churazov, E.; Sazonov, S.; Sunyaev, R.; Forman, W.; Jones, C.; Böhringer, H. (1 October 2005). "Supermassive black holes in elliptical galaxies: switching from very bright to very dim". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 363 (1): L91–L95. arXiv:astro-ph/0507073. Bibcode:2005MNRAS.363L..91C. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00093.x. ISSN 1745-3925.
  9. Gebhardt, Karl; Bender, Ralf; Bower, Gary; Dressler, Alan; Faber, S. M.; Filippenko, Alexei V.; Richard Green; Grillmair, Carl; Ho, Luis C. (1 January 2000). "A Relationship between Nuclear Black Hole Mass and Galaxy Velocity Dispersion". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 539 (1): L13. arXiv:astro-ph/0006289. Bibcode:2000ApJ...539L..13G. doi:10.1086/312840. ISSN 1538-4357.
  10. Barnes, Joshua E. (9 March 1989). "Evolution of compact groups and the formation of elliptical galaxies". Nature. 338 (6211): 123–126. Bibcode:1989Natur.338..123B. doi:10.1038/338123a0.
  11. "Current Science Highlights: When Galaxies Collide". www.noao.edu. Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  12. Saintonge, Amelie. "What happens when galaxies collide? (Beginner) - Curious About Astronomy? Ask an Astronomer". curious.astro.cornell.edu. Retrieved 25 April 2016.
  13. Cox, T. J.; Loeb, Abraham (1 May 2008). "The collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386 (1): 461–474. arXiv:0705.1170. Bibcode:2008MNRAS.386..461C. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13048.x. ISSN 0035-8711.
  14. "Giant Galaxies Die from the Inside Out". www.eso.org. European Southern Observatory. Retrieved 21 April 2015.
  15. Carroll, Bradley W.; Ostlie, Dale A. (2007). An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics. New York: Pearson. ISBN 978-0805304022.
  16. Blanton, Michael R.; Hogg, David W.; Bahcall, Neta A.; Baldry, Ivan K.; Brinkmann, J.; Csabai, István; Daniel Eisenstein; Fukugita, Masataka; Gunn, James E. (1 January 2003). "The Broadband Optical Properties of Galaxies with Redshifts 0.02 < z < 0.22". The Astrophysical Journal. 594 (1): 186. arXiv:astro-ph/0209479. Bibcode:2003ApJ...594..186B. doi:10.1086/375528. ISSN 0004-637X.
  17. Faber, S. M.; Willmer, C. N. A.; Wolf, C.; Koo, D. C.; Weiner, B. J.; Newman, J. A.; Im, M.; Coil, A. L.; C. Conroy (1 January 2007). "Galaxy Luminosity Functions to z 1 from DEEP2 and COMBO-17: Implications for Red Galaxy Formation". The Astrophysical Journal. 665 (1): 265–294. arXiv:astro-ph/0506044. Bibcode:2007ApJ...665..265F. doi:10.1086/519294. ISSN 0004-637X.
  18. Blanton, Michael R. (1 January 2006). "Galaxies in SDSS and DEEP2: A Quiet Life on the Blue Sequence?". The Astrophysical Journal. 648 (1): 268–280. arXiv:astro-ph/0512127. Bibcode:2006ApJ...648..268B. doi:10.1086/505628. ISSN 0004-637X.
  19. Gabor, J. M.; Davé, R.; Finlator, K.; Oppenheimer, B. D. (11 September 2010). "How is star formation quenched in massive galaxies?". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 407 (2): 749–771. arXiv:1001.1734. Bibcode:2010MNRAS.407..749G. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16961.x. ISSN 0035-8711.
  20. Kereš, Dušan; Katz, Neal; Davé, Romeel; Fardal, Mark; Weinberg, David H. (11 July 2009). "Galaxies in a simulated ΛCDM universe – II. Observable properties and constraints on feedback". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 396 (4): 2332–2344. arXiv:0901.1880. Bibcode:2009MNRAS.396.2332K. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14924.x. ISSN 0035-8711.
  21. Peng, Y.; Maiolino, R.; Cochrane, R. (2015). "Strangulation as the primary mechanism for shutting down star formation in galaxies". Nature. 521 (7551): 192–195. arXiv:1505.03143. Bibcode:2015Natur.521..192P. doi:10.1038/nature14439. PMID 25971510.
  22. Bianconi, Matteo; Marleau, Francine R.; Fadda, Dario (2016). "Star formation and black hole accretion activity in rich local clusters of galaxies". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 588: A105. arXiv:1601.06080. Bibcode:2016A&A...588A.105B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527116.
  23. Kereš, Dušan; Katz, Neal; Fardal, Mark; Davé, Romeel; Weinberg, David H. (1 May 2009). "Galaxies in a simulated ΛCDM Universe – I. Cold mode and hot cores". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 395 (1): 160–179. arXiv:0809.1430. Bibcode:2009MNRAS.395..160K. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14541.x. ISSN 0035-8711.
  24. Di Matteo, Tiziana; Springel, Volker; Hernquist, Lars (2005). "Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies". Nature (Submitted manuscript). 433 (7026): 604–607. arXiv:astro-ph/0502199. Bibcode:2005Natur.433..604D. doi:10.1038/nature03335. PMID 15703739.
  25. Mutch, Simon J.; Croton, Darren J.; Poole, Gregory B. (1 January 2011). "The Mid-life Crisis of the Milky Way and M31". The Astrophysical Journal. 736 (2): 84. arXiv:1105.2564. Bibcode:2011ApJ...736...84M. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/84. ISSN 0004-637X.
  26. "A young elliptical". Retrieved 16 November 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.