Lincoln (novel)

Lincoln: A Novel is a 1984 historical novel, part of the Narratives of Empire series by Gore Vidal. The novel describes the presidency of Abraham Lincoln and extends from the start of the American Civil War until his assassination. Rather than focus on the Civil War itself, the novel is centred on the Lincoln's political and personal struggles. Though Lincoln is the focus, the book is never narrated from his point of view (with the exception of several paragraphs describing a dream Lincoln had shortly before his death). Vidal writes from the perspective of key historical figures. He draws from contemporary diaries, memoirs, letters, newspaper accounts, the biographical writings of John Hay and John Nicolay, Lincoln's secretaries and the work of modern historians.

Lincoln
Cover of the first edition
AuthorGore Vidal
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
SeriesNarratives of Empire
GenreHistorical novel
PublisherRandom House
Publication date
1984
Media typePrint (Hardback & Paperback)
Pages672 pp
ISBN0-375-70876-6
OCLC43479239
Preceded byBurr 
Followed by1876 

Plot, Style and Themes

Style

The novel is part of Gore Vidal’s ‘Narratives of Empire’ series and joins his other works; Burr (1973), 1876 (1976) and Washington D.C. (1967) as chronicles of America. In the series, Vidal offers works of historical fiction that reinterpret American history starting from the American Revolution and spanning past World War II.[1]

The book is never narrated from Lincoln’s perspective. Rather, the reader views Lincoln through the eyes of his enemies, friends, political rivalries and even those who sought to kill him. Significant characters include Lincoln’s cabinet secretaries; William Seward, Salmon Chase as well as Kate Sprague, John Hay, Mary Todd Lincoln and David Herold.

Much of the writing is presented through dramatic, flamboyant dialogue. Vidal favours this over narration or observational writing, attempting to convey his own personal wit and charisma through his characters.[2]

The novel is not simply a work of historical fiction, but with Lincoln's personal and political development it is also a Bildungsroman.[3] Lincoln's development starts with the slow mobilisation and unification of his inner Cabinet, climaxes with his military victory and political restoration of the Union and is completed with his assassination

"Lincoln, in some mysterious fashion, had willed his own murder as a form of atonement for the great and terrible thing that he had done by giving so bloody and absolute a rebirth to his nation."


Plot

The novel commences on February 23 1861 as Lincoln, the incumbent president, is leaving his Illinois legal practice to Washington. It is in Washington where a majority of the novel is set. Washington is depicted as turbulent and deteriorating with infestations of pests, poor infrastructure and an incomplete Washington Monument. [4] The novel extends across Lincoln’s entire term of office throughout the American civil war. It offers a detailed and extensive narrative, with the book totalling over 650 pages. It primarily focuses on Lincoln's efforts to unite and mobilise political adversaries and military strategists to ultimately win the war. It is through the various perspectives of other characters that Vidal portrays an ambitious visionary who struggles with an unstable marriage, physical ailments and the failing trust of his fellow cabinet members.[5] The novel also explores Lincoln’s growth as he overcomes these personal and political burdens to ultimately triumph and preserve the union.[6] Vidal completes the novel with President Lincoln’s assassination.

Themes

The central thematic development is the reinterpretation of the idealistic, sentimental ‘Honest Abe.’ Vidal depicts a politically cunning, dictatorial leader whose primary motivation was not the liberation of African American slaves nor adherence to the Constitution, but the preservation of the Union. Vidal even goes far enough to contend that Lincoln held an unshaken belief of white superiority and was willing to 'bend the Constitution,' although this has been significantly criticised.[7] Vidal believes that it was Lincoln's willingness to act unilaterally and suspend democratic principles such as habeas corpus that allowed him to succeed in his unflinching pursuit of unification. He jailed hostile newspaper editors, political opponents and even employed the Secret Service to inspect private communications. [3]

Vidal follows the complex politics of the cabinet and congress. Initially, Lincoln faces political opponents who constantly doubt and undermine his leadership. Indeed, many of Congressman viewed Lincoln as mild-mannered and weak. However, as the novel progresses, the reader comes to understand that Lincoln purposely and cleverly masks his true emotions. Vidal contends that Lincoln's greatest leadership quality is his introverted nature. Dealing with treacherous politicians, arrogant generals and critics, Lincoln was shrewd and cunning to masterfully navigate the United States to unification as a Republic. Despite the incompetent military strategists and petty, squabbling politicians, Lincoln was aware that his primary goal was to hold the North together for as long as possible. This was because the battle was one of attrition and Lincoln knew that the South's smaller population would be exhausted first.

Ultimately, even Lincoln's political rivalries come to respect his leadership. William Seward, once a fierce opponent and underminer of Lincoln transforms into a devoted servant.

“I may once have wanted—even lusted—for power, but all that has been burned away. There is nothing left of me. But there is still the President.”

There were also shortcomings of Lincoln. He is depicted as hopelessly naive in dealing with the remarkable costs of financing the war and dealing with the US Treasury. He also struggles as a father. His son, Robert, confides in Hay and reveals that he feels neglected. He comes to resent his father's political ambition that caused him to be so preoccupied and distant. [6] His wife's mood swings and insatiable spending further challenge Lincoln's stoicism, however whilst the marriage is turbulent. the two seem to share a strong bond.[8]

With frequent light-hearted ‘outlandish’ anecdotes and humour, Vidal sought to also explore the human side of Lincoln. [9] Vidal perceived Lincoln's humour as a necessity to dealing with his many great burdens. [6]

Characters

Portrait of Mary Todd Lincoln taken during 1860-65

Mary Todd Lincoln

Lincoln deeply loved his wife and struggled greatly with her mental collapse. She is depicted as a vulnerability in Lincoln's political tactics, frequently clashing with Congressman.

Nonetheless, Vidal's representation of Mary is mostly positive. She is seen as an intelligent and decent person who unfortunately succumbs to fits of insanity characterised by wild mood swings and insatiable spending.[6]

John Hay

John Hay was Lincoln's personal secretary. He is represented as a close friend and confidant of Lincoln. He was a young man at the time of Lincoln's presidency and was energetic and high-spirited, even through the more challenging times of the war.[3]

William Seward

Seward was the U.S secretary of State and is depicted as a handsome, yet politically cunning rivalry of Lincoln. Initially Seward was a believer that the Southern States should be allowed to pursue their legal right of independence, however under Lincoln's impressive leadership he came to understand the importance of unification. He is an outspoken member of Lincoln's cabinet, and oversaw the war effort.[5]

Salmon P. Chase

Salmon was the Secretary of the U.S Treasury. He, like many other politicians, doubted Lincoln's leadership ability believing the role was too great for someone he believed to be ordinary. He comes to regret his opinion of Lincoln when he finally becomes aware of Lincoln's greatness.[3]

Edwin Stanton

Edwin Stanton, was the U.S. secretary of war. Stanton was tasked with repairing the poor reputation and image of the War Department that was due to his predecessor's mismanagement. He is represented as a large, firm man who often was condescending to others' contribution. He did not have a favourable opinion of Lincoln, but nonetheless worked hard under his command.[8]

John Booth, Lincoln's assassin

David Herold and John Wilkes Booth

Herold and Booth are the coconspirators who devised and successfully executed a plan to assassinate Lincoln.

Herold despises Lincoln's attempts at unification. He is depicted as unintelligent and frequently engages in debauchery, visiting many brothels throughout his travels in America. He eventually finds a group of like-minded individuals who also seek to kill Lincoln, and it is here where he meets Booth.

John Booth is the assassin of Lincoln. Booth is not as incompetent as Herold, but is also a hate-filled enemy of Lincoln. He seeks to avenge the defeat of the South, and stalks Lincoln throughout the novel, swearing revenge. His narrative climaxes with the assassination of Lincoln and subsequent daring escape. [4]

Critical and Public Reception

The critical reception of the book has been widely varied. With a rating of 4.21/5 stars from 8,256 ratings on Goodreads, the wider public mostly enjoyed the narrative as a work of historical fiction. Common themes among reviewers were the novel’s entertaining style and accessibility. [10]

The Washington Post also wrote a positive review at the time of publication, praising Vidal’s well practiced craftsmanship in skilfully creating a satisfying read. This positive praise was reflected in The New York Book Review.[11]

The book was also subject to critical backlash, primarily from academic historians. [12] Roy P. Basler contends that much of Lincoln’s life never happened as told by Vidal. [13] This historical inaccuracy extends to the character’s personalities and physical attributes. Significantly, Vidal faced intense criticism for his depiction of a racist Lincoln, and a syphilitic deranged Mary Todd Lincoln. [14] Despite the novel’s genre of historical narrative, the purported distortion in facts was seen as potentially damaging to the public. [15]

John Alvis published a review of the novel in The Claremont Review of Books. According to Alvis, the book is ‘disappointing for being at bottom inadequate.’ It was contended that Vidal’s novel succumbed to melodrama, historical inaccuracy and sensationalism. [16] The Dean of Lincoln Scholars Richard N. Current took great exception to his novel, starting a running feud with Vidal in the pages of The New York Review of Books.[17][18]

However, within academic quarters there was also positive reception. Harold Bloom, the Sterling Professor of Humanities at Yale University, published a review in the New York Review of Books, where he called the book ‘superb’ and ‘grand entertainment.’ [19] Vidal was also described as an impressive writer who has helped shape popular consciousness and offer an alternative view on the dominant understanding of American society and history. [20]

Awards

In 1985 Vidal was awarded the Benjamin Barondess Award for the novel. The recipient of the award receives a sculpture of Abraham Lincoln, specifically a bust. It is presented annually "to any person or institution and for any contribution to the greater appreciation of the life and works of Abraham Lincoln as decided upon by the award committee.” [21]

A bust of Abraham Lincoln

It also was placed on the Torchlight List that recognises 200 works that equip people with concepts to help them comprehend the complexities of the modern world. The list is definitive and was devised by Jim Flynn, a professor who lecturers at the University of Otago.[22]

It was also placed on the New York Times Best Seller List in 1984.[23]

Adaptation

Lincoln, a made-for-TV film based on the novel, first aired in 1988 in two parts on March 27 and March 28. It stars Sam Waterston as Lincoln and Mary Tyler Moore as Mary Todd Lincoln.

It differed from the book by focussing less on the personal struggle and growth of Lincoln, but more on the war itself. Both the director and lead actress were awarded Emmys for their work on the miniseries.

Writing and Publication

The book was published in 1984 by Penguin Random House LLC. Vidal claimed that the book was researched and written over a period of 5 years. It largely draws from primary sources, including newspapers, diaries, and letters of the time.[24] Like Vidal's other historical fiction works, such as Washington D.C. and Burr: A Novel, Vidal includes an extraordinary amount of detail, and attempts to follow the documented record closely.

Vidal’s Lincoln was considered a commercial success.[25] It was on The New York Times’ best-seller chart for 22 weeks and sold over 250 000 hard cover copies. [26] The Afterword of the novel thanks Professor David Herbert Donald of Harvard’s History Department for fact checking the manuscript.

References

  1. "Lincoln by gore Vidal". Goodreads. Goodreads inc. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  2. Parini, Jay (1992). Gore Vidal: Writer Against the Grain. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 1–320. ISBN 0233987967.
  3. "Lincoln Summary - eNotes.com". eNotes. Retrieved 2020-11-20.
  4. Goodman, Walter (16 May 1988). "History as Fiction". The New Leader. 71: 11–12 via JSTOR.
  5. Basler, Roy (1986). "Lincoln and American Writers". Papers of the Abraham Lincoln. 7 (1): 15. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  6. Alvis, John (1984). "Lincoln as Nihilist". Claremont Review of Books. 3 (4): 50. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  7. Suplee, Curt (4 July 1984). "Gore Vidal, Into the Fray Again: The Audacious Author and the Reconstruction of 'Lincoln' Gore Vidal". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
  8. Baker, Susan (1997). Gore Vidal: A Critical Companion. Westport: Greenwood Press. pp. 40–65. ISBN 0313295794.
  9. Alvis, John (1984). "Lincoln as Nihilist". Claremont Review of Books. 3 (4): 50. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  10. "Lincoln by gore Vidal". Goodreads. Goodreads inc. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
  11. Bloom, Harold. "The Central Man". The New York Review. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  12. Suplee, Curt (4 July 1984). "Gore Vidal, Into the Fray Again: The Audacious Author and the Reconstruction of 'Lincoln' Gore Vidal". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
  13. Basler, Roy (1986). "Lincoln and American Writers". Papers of the Abraham Lincoln. 7 (1): 10. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  14. Basler, Roy (1986). "Lincoln and American Writers". Papers of the Abraham Lincoln. 7 (1): 12. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  15. Williams, F (24 April 1988). "Gore Vidal on Lincoln". The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 12 October 2020.
  16. Alvis, John (1984). "Lincoln as Nihilist". Claremont Review of Books. 3 (4): 50. Retrieved 10 September 2020.
  17. "Vidal's 'Lincoln': An Exchange", The New York Review of Books, August 18, 1988
  18. "Richard Current, 100, dean of Lincoln scholars - The Boston Globe". BostonGlobe.com.
  19. Bloom, Harold. "The Central Man". The New York Review. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
  20. Altman, D (2005). "Gore Vidal: Critic and Celebrity". Harvard Review. 29 (84): 86. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
  21. "Barondess/Lincoln Award". The Civil War Round Table of New York. CWRT. Retrieved 10 October 2020.
  22. Flynn, Jim (2010). The Torch Light List. Wellington New Zealand: AWA Press.
  23. Kelley, B. "Vidal's Lincoln Receives First Rate, Faithful Adaptation". South Florida Sun Sentinel. Retrieved 5 October 2020.
  24. Suplee, Curt (4 July 1984). "Gore Vidal, Into the Fray Again: The Audacious Author and the Reconstruction of 'Lincoln' Gore Vidal". The Washington Post. Retrieved 6 September 2020.
  25. Snee, B (2016). Early Cinematic Adaptations of the Life of America's Greatest President. Lexington Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. p. 123.
  26. Kelley, B. "Vidal's Lincoln Receives First Rate, Faithful Adaptation". South Florida Sun Sentinel. Retrieved 5 October 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.