Macaulayism

Thomas Babington Macaulay was born in Leicestershire, England, on 25 October 1800, the son of Zachary Macaulay, a former governor of the colony of Sierra Leone and anti-slavery activist.[2] His mother was Selina Mills, a pupil of the great British moralist, Hannah More.

Elected to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom in 1830 as a member of the reformist Whig party, Macaulay was named in 1834 as an inaugural member of a governing Supreme Council of India.[2] Macaulay spent the next four years in India, where he devoted his efforts to reforming the Indian criminal code, putting the British and natives on an equal legal footing, and to establishing an educational system based upon the British model, which involved introducing Indians to European ideas from the Renaissance, the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment.[2]

Macaulay held western culture in high esteem, and was dismissive of the existent Indian culture, which he perceived as stagnant and something which had fallen well behind mainstream European scientific and philosophical thought. He saw his undertaking as a "civilising mission":

"We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect. To that class we may leave it to refine the vernacular dialects of the country, to enrich those dialects with terms of science borrowed from the Western nomenclature, and to render them by degrees fit vehicles for conveying knowledge to the great mass of the population."[3]

Since the second half of the 20th century, Hindu nationalists in India have criticized Macaulay his views on Hinduism and Indian culture at large, which they claim colored his educational policies.[4]

Speaking at a national seminar on "Decolonising English Education" in 2001, professor Kapil Kapoor of Jawaharlal Nehru University highlighted that mainstream English-language education in India today has tended to "marginalise inherited learning" and uproot academics from traditional Indian modes of thought, inducing in them "a spirit of self-denigration (heenabhavna)."[5] Many Indian nationalists have criticized Macaulayism, claiming that it uprooted Indian traditions in sectors such as finance and replaced them with a foreign system which was wholly unsuited to India. In addition, they claim that Macaulayism caused foreign systems of thought to become prioritized over Indian systems of thought, in particular Hindu systems of thought.[6]