Newcastle-upon-Tyne (UK Parliament constituency)
Newcastle-upon-Tyne was a borough constituency in the county of Northumberland of the House of Commons of England to 1706 then of the House of Commons of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1918. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs), elected by the bloc vote system.
Newcastle-upon-Tyne | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | Northumberland |
Major settlements | Newcastle upon Tyne |
1295–1918 | |
Number of members | Two |
Replaced by | Newcastle-upon-Tyne Central, Newcastle-upon-Tyne East, Newcastle-upon-Tyne North and Newcastle-upon-Tyne West |
The constituency was abolished in 1918, being split into four divisions; Newcastle-upon-Tyne Central, Newcastle-upon-Tyne East, Newcastle-upon-Tyne North and Newcastle-upon-Tyne West.
Boundaries
The constituency was based upon the town, later city, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne; in the historic county of Northumberland in North East England. In 1848, the constituency boundaries were described in A Topographical Dictionary of England.[1]
The borough first exercised the elective franchise in the 23rd of Edward the First, since which time it has returned two members to parliament: the present electoral limits are co-extensive with those of the county of the town, comprising 5730 acres; the old boundaries, which were abrogated in 1832, included 2700 acres only.
When the House of Commons debated the boundaries to be used from 1832, the Tory Party suggested including Gateshead (to the south) and South Shields (to the east) within the Newcastle-upon-Tyne constituency. The Whigs resisted this idea, so these two neighbouring settlements were not incorporated into this seat.[2]
The boundaries of the parliamentary borough, as defined by the Parliamentary Boundaries Act 1832 (2 and 3 Wm. 4, c. 64), remained unchanged from 1832 until the area was divided into single member constituencies in 1918.[3] These were not necessarily identical to the boundaries used for local government purposes.
In the period after 1885, the constituency was surrounded by Wansbeck to the west and north, Tyneside to the north east and east, Jarrow to the south east, Gateshead to the south, and Chester-le-Street to the south west.[4]
Members of Parliament
Party affiliations are derived from Stook Smith and Craig (see reference section below). Tory is used prior to the 1835 general election and Conservative from that time. Liberal candidates (as listed by Craig) before the formal creation of the party, shortly after the 1859 general election, are listed as Whig or Radical if the information is available in the work by Stooks Smith.
MPs, who were known by the same name, are distinguished in the table below and the election results by a number in brackets after the name. It is not suggested that such numbers were used by contemporaries of the individuals so numbered.
MPs 1386–1660
Parliament | First member | Second member |
---|---|---|
1378 | William Bishopdale[5] | |
1381 | William Bishopdale[5] | |
1386 | John Howell | Laurence Acton[6] |
1388 (February) | William Bishopdale | Sampson Hardyng[6] |
1388 (September) | Henry Carlisle | Stephen Whitgray[6] |
1390 (January) | William Bishopdale | Stephen Whitgray[6] |
1390 (November) | ||
1391 | William Bishopdale | Laurence Acton[6] |
1393 | John Morton | Richard/William Langton[6] |
1394 | Henry Carlisle | Thomas Diringdon[6] |
1395 | John Morton | William Langton[6] |
1397 (January) | William Redmarshall | Sampson Hardyng[6] |
1397 (September) | William Redmarshall | Laurence Acton[6] |
1399 | Roger Thornton | Laurence Acton[6] |
1401 | ||
1402 | Robert Darcy | Richard Beverley[6] |
1404 (January) | ||
1404 (October) | ||
1406 | John Paulyn | Robert Hebburn[6] |
1407 | William Johnson | William Langton[6] |
1410 | ||
1411 | Roger Thornton | Roger Booth[6] |
1413 (February) | ||
1413 (May) | Richard Dalton | Robert Whelpington[6] |
1414 (April) | William Middleton | Robert Swinburne[6] |
1414 (November) | William Johnson | Robert Whelpington[6] |
1415 | Roger Booth | Robert Whelpington[6] |
1416 (March) | Roger Booth | Thomas Hebburn[6] |
1416 (October) | ||
1417 | Roger Thornton | John Strother[6] |
1419 | Roger Thornton | John Strother[6] |
1420 | Roger Booth | John Wall[6] |
1421 (May) | Emericus Hering | John Strother[6] |
1421 (December) | Roger Booth | William Ellerby[6] |
1510-1523 | No names known[7] | |
1529 | Sir Thomas Tempest | Henry Anderson[7] |
1536 | ?Sir Thomas Tempest | ?[7] |
1539 | ? | |
1542 | ? | |
1545 | Sir Robert Bowes | Robert Brandling[7] |
1547 | Sir Francis Leke | Sir Robert Brandling[7] |
1553 (March) | Robert Lewen | Bertram Anderson[7] |
1553 (October) | Sir Robert Brandling | Edward Hall[7] |
1554 (April) | Bertram Anderson | Cuthbert Horsley[7] |
1554 (November) | Bertram Anderson | John Watson[7] |
1555 | Sir Robert Brandling | Cuthbert Blount[7] |
1558 | Bertram Anderson | Robert Lewen[7] |
1559 (January) | Robert Lewen | Cuthbert Blount[8] |
1562 (December) | Sir Robert Brandling | Bertram Anderson[8] |
1571 | William Carr | William Jenison I[8] |
1572 (April) | William Jenison I | William Selby[8] |
1584 | William Jenison I | Henry Anderson[8] |
1586 | Henry Anderson | Edward Lewen[8] |
1588 (October) | Henry Anderson | Henry Mitford[8] |
1593 | Henry Anderson | Henry Mitford[8] |
1597 (October) | Henry Chapman | Henry Lindley[8] |
1601 (October) | William Jenison II | George Selby[8] |
1604 | George Selby | Henry Chapman |
1614 | Henry Anderson | William Jenison II |
1621 | Henry Anderson | Sir Thomas Ridell |
1624 | Sir Peter Riddel | Sir Henry Anderson |
1625 | Sir Thomas Ridell | Sir Henry Anderson |
1626 | Sir Peter Riddel | Sir Henry Anderson |
1628 | Sir Peter Riddel | Sir Thomas Ridell |
1629–1640 | No Parliaments convened | |
1640 (April) | Sir Peter Riddel | Thomas Liddel |
1640 (November) | Sir Henry Anderson, disabled 1643 | John Blakiston |
1645 | Sir Henry Anderson | John Blakiston, replaced 1647 by Robert Ellison) |
1648 | Robert Ellison) | John Blakiston, died 1649 |
1654 | Sir Arthur Hesilrige | (One seat only) |
1656 | Walter Strickland | (One seat only) |
1659 | Mark Shaftoe (of Newcastle) | Thomas Lilburne |
MPs 1660–1918
Elections
The bloc vote electoral system was used in elections to fill two seats and first past the post for single member by-elections. Each voter had up to as many votes as there were seats to be filled. Votes had to be cast by a spoken declaration, in public, at the hustings (until the secret ballot was introduced in 1872).
Note on percentage change calculations: Where there was only one candidate of a party in successive elections, for the same number of seats, change is calculated on the party percentage vote. Where there was more than one candidate, in one or both successive elections for the same number of seats, then change is calculated on the individual percentage vote (if applicable).
The reference to some candidates as Non Partisan does not, necessarily, mean that they did not have a party allegiance. It means that the sources consulted did not specify a party allegiance.
Before the Representation of the People Act 1832, the borough had an electorate limited to its freemen. There were about 2,500 voters in the second half of the 18th century.[21]
1710s – 1720s – 1730s – 1740s – 1750s – 1760s – 1770s – 1780s – 1790s – 1800s – 1810s – 1820s – 1830s |
Elections of the 1710s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Blackett (3) | 1,177 | 44.0 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | William Wrightson | 886 | 33.2 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | William Carr (2) | 609 | 22.8 | N/A | |
Turnout | 2,672 | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Blackett (3) | 639 | 44.0 | ... | |
Non Partisan | William Wrightson | 550 | 37.9 | +4.7 | |
Non Partisan | James Clavering | 263 | 18.1 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,452 | N/A | N/A |
Elections of the 1720s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Carr (2) | 1,264 | 38.3 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | William Blackett(3) | 1,158 | 35.9 | -8.1 | |
Non Partisan | William Wrightson | 831 | 25.8 | -12.1 | |
Turnout | 3,223 | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William Blackett (3) | 1,202 | 39.9 | +4.0 | |
Non Partisan | Nicholas Fenwick | 1,189 | 39.5 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | William Carr (2) | 620 | 20.6 | -17.7 | |
Turnout | 3,011 | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Blackett, in 1728
- On petition Carr vice Blackett
Elections of the 1730s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Walter Calverley-Blackett | 1,354 | 42.9 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Nicholas Fenwick | 1,083 | 34.3 | -5.2 | |
Non Partisan | William Carr (2) | 716 | 22.7 | -2.1 | |
Turnout | 3,153 (1,795 electors) | N/A | N/A |
Elections of the 1740s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Walter Calverley-Blackett | 1,453 | 32.3 | -10.6 | |
Non Partisan | Nicholas Fenwick | 1,231 | 27.4 | -6.9 | |
Non Partisan | Matthew Ridley | 1,131 | 25.1 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | William Carr (2) | 683 | 15.2 | -7.5 | |
Turnout | 4,498 (2,391 electors) | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Walter Calverley-Blackett | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Matthew Ridley | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections of the 1750s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Walter Calverley-Blackett | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Matthew Ridley | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections of the 1760s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Walter Calverley-Blackett | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Matthew Ridley | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Walter Calverley-Blackett | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Matthew Ridley | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections of the 1770s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Walter Calverley-Blackett | 1,432 | 33.2 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Matthew Ridley (1) | 1,411 | 32.7 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Constantine Phipps | 795 | 18.4 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Thomas Delaval | 677 | 15.7 | N/A | |
Turnout | 4,315 (2,162 electors) | N/A | N/A |
- Death of Blackett
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | John Trevelyan | 1,163 | 52.1 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Andrew Stoney-Bowes | 1,068 | 47.9 | N/A | |
Majority | 95 | 4.3 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 2,231 | N/A | N/A | ||
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections of the 1780s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Matthew Ridley (1) | 1,408 | 38.8 | +6.1 | |
Non Partisan | Andrew Stoney-Bowes | 1,135 | 31.3 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Thomas Delaval | 1,085 | 29.9 | +14.2 | |
Turnout | 3,628 (2,245 electors) | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (1) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Brandling | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Elections of the 1790s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (1) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Brandling | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (1) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Brandling | Unopposed | N/A | N/A |
- Resignation of Brandling in December 1797
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Charles Brandling | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections of the 1800s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (1) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Brandling | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (1) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Brandling | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (1) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Charles Brandling | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections of the 1810s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Cuthbert Ellison | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Ridley succeeded as the 3rd Baronet, upon the death of his father (and predecessor as MP) in 1813
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Cuthbert Ellison | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Cuthbert Ellison | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections of the 1820s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | 616 | 47.0 | N/A | |
Whig | Cuthbert Ellison | 477 | 36.4 | N/A | |
Tory | John Scott | 217 | 16.6 | New | |
Majority | 260 | 17.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,310 (731 electors) | N/A | N/A | ||
Whig hold | Swing | ||||
Whig hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Cuthbert Ellison | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections of the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | Unopposed | |||
Tory | John Hodgson | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | c. 5,000 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory gain from Whig |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | Unopposed | |||
Tory | John Hodgson | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | c. 5,000 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | 2,112 | 43.2 | ||
Tory | John Hodgson | 1,686 | 34.5 | ||
Radical | Charles Attwood | 1,092 | 22.3 | ||
Turnout | 2,850 | 73.0 | |||
Registered electors | 3,905 | ||||
Majority | 426 | 8.7 | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Majority | 594 | 12.1 | |||
Tory hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Ord | 1,843 | 33.0 | +11.4 | |
Whig | Matthew Ridley (2) | 1,499 | 26.8 | +5.2 | |
Conservative | John Hodgson | 1,254 | 22.5 | −12.0 | |
Radical | James Aytoun | 988 | 17.7 | −4.6 | |
Majority | 245 | 4.4 | −4.3 | ||
Turnout | 3,107 | 76.6 | +3.6 | ||
Registered electors | 4,054 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | +8.7 | |||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | +5.6 | |||
Ridley's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Hodgson | 1,576 | 50.8 | +28.3 | |
Whig | Christopher Blackett | 1,528 | 49.2 | −10.6 | |
Majority | 48 | 1.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 3,104 | 75.5 | −1.1 | ||
Registered electors | 4,110 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +19.5 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Ord | 1,792 | 29.4 | −3.6 | |
Conservative | John Hodgson-Hinde | 1,701 | 27.9 | +16.7 | |
Whig | Charles John Bigge | 1,187 | 19.5 | −7.3 | |
Conservative | John Blenkinsopp Coulson[24] | 1,127 | 18.5 | +7.3 | |
Chartist | Augustus Harding Beaumont[25] | 290 | 4.8 | New | |
Turnout | 3,173 | 69.2 | −7.4 | ||
Registered electors | 4,582 | ||||
Majority | 91 | 1.5 | −2.9 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −6.0 | |||
Majority | 514 | 8.4 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +11.1 | |||
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Hodgson-Hinde | Unopposed | |||
Whig | William Ord | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 5,124 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Ord | 2,196 | 36.2 | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Emerson Headlam | 2,068 | 34.1 | N/A | |
Conservative | Richard Hodgson[26] | 1,680 | 27.7 | N/A | |
Majority | 273 | 6.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 3,812 (est) | 72.7 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 5,245 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1850s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Blackett | 2,418 | 37.9 | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Emerson Headlam | 2,172 | 34.0 | −0.1 | |
Whig | William Henry Watson[27][28] | 1,795 | 28.1 | N/A | |
Majority | 377 | 5.9 | +1.5 | ||
Turnout | 3,193 (est) | 60.6 (est) | −12.1 | ||
Registered electors | 5,269 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Blackett resigned due to ill health, causing a by-election.[29]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Ridley | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Ridley | 2,445 | 39.1 | +1.2 | |
Whig | Thomas Emerson Headlam | 2,133 | 34.1 | +0.1 | |
Conservative | Peter Carstairs[30] | 1,673 | 26.8 | New | |
Majority | 460 | 7.3 | +1.4 | ||
Turnout | 3,962 (est) | 66.5 (est) | +5.9 | ||
Registered electors | 5,962 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Emerson Headlam | 2,688 | 46.1 | +12.0 | |
Liberal | George Ridley | 2,679 | 46.0 | +6.9 | |
Liberal | Peter Alfred Taylor | 462 | 7.9 | N/A | |
Majority | 2,217 | 38.1 | +30.8 | ||
Turnout | 2,915 (est) | 48.5 (est) | −18.0 | ||
Registered electors | 6,008 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A |
Headlam was appointed Judge-Advocate General of the Armed Forces, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Emerson Headlam | 2,153 | 56.0 | +9.9 | |
Conservative | William Cuthbert[31] | 1,086 | 28.2 | New | |
Majority | 1,067 | 27.8 | −10.3 | ||
Turnout | 3,846 | 64.0 | +15.5 | ||
Registered electors | 6,008 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1860s
Ridley resigned after being appointed a Copyhold, Inclosure and Tithe Commissioner.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Somerset Beaumont | 2,346 | 61.0 | N/A | |
Independent Liberal | Peter Carstairs[32][33] | 1,500 | 39.0 | New | |
Majority | 846 | 22.0 | −16.1 | ||
Turnout | 3,846 | 70.2 | +21.7 | ||
Registered electors | 5,475 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Joseph Cowen | 2,941 | 39.3 | N/A | |
Liberal | Thomas Emerson Headlam | 2,477 | 33.1 | −13.0 | |
Liberal | Somerset Beaumont | 2,060 | 27.5 | −18.5 | |
Majority | 417 | 5.6 | −32.4 | ||
Turnout | 3,739 (est) | 56.4 (est) | +7.9 | ||
Registered electors | 6,630 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Joseph Cowen | 7,057 | 42.9 | +3.6 | |
Liberal | Thomas Emerson Headlam | 6,674 | 40.6 | +7.5 | |
Conservative | Charles Frederick Hamond | 2,725 | 16.6 | New | |
Majority | 3,949 | 24.0 | +18.4 | ||
Turnout | 9,591 (est) | 51.7 (est) | −4.7 | ||
Registered electors | 18,557 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1870s
Cowen's death caused a by-election, at which his son was elected.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Joseph Cowen | 7,356 | 53.7 | −29.8 | |
Conservative | Charles Frederick Hamond | 6,353 | 46.3 | +29.7 | |
Majority | 1,003 | 7.3 | −16.7 | ||
Turnout | 13,709 | 64.0 | +12.3 | ||
Registered electors | 21,407 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −29.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Joseph Cowen | 8,464 | 40.8 | −2.1 | |
Conservative | Charles Frederick Hamond | 6,479 | 31.2 | +14.6 | |
Liberal | Thomas Emerson Headlam | 5,807 | 28.0 | −12.6 | |
Turnout | 13,615 (est) | 63.6 (est) | +11.9 | ||
Registered electors | 21,407 | ||||
Majority | 1,985 | 9.6 | −14.4 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −4.7 | |||
Majority | 672 | 3.2 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +14.7 | |||
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Joseph Cowen | 11,766 | 42.9 | +2.1 | |
Liberal | Ashton Wentworth Dilke | 10,404 | 37.9 | +9.9 | |
Conservative | Charles Frederick Hamond | 5,271 | 19.2 | −12.0 | |
Majority | 5,133 | 18.7 | +9.1 | ||
Turnout | 17,037 (est) | 71.6 (est) | +8.0 | ||
Registered electors | 23,800 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +4.1 | |||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +7.8 | |||
Dilke's resignation caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Morley | 9,443 | 56.8 | −24.0 | |
Conservative | Gainford Bruce[34] | 7,187 | 43.2 | +24.0 | |
Majority | 2,256 | 13.6 | −5.1 | ||
Turnout | 16,630 | 62.1 | −9.5 (est) | ||
Registered electors | 26,305 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −24.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent Liberal | Joseph Cowen | 10,489 | 34.9 | −8.0 | |
Liberal | John Morley | 10,129 | 33.6 | −4.3 | |
Conservative | Charles Frederic Hamond | 9,500 | 31.5 | +12.3 | |
Turnout | 30,478 | 73.0 | +1.4 (est) | ||
Registered electors | 30,314 | ||||
Majority | 989 | 3.4 | N/A | ||
Independent Liberal gain from Liberal | Swing | N/A | |||
Majority | 629 | 2.1 | −16.6 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −5.3 |
- Cowen lost the support of the local Liberal Association during the campaign period, and Liberal supporters were urged to only vote for Morley.
Morley was appointed Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Morley | 11,110 | 56.8 | +23.2 | |
Conservative | Charles Frederick Hamond | 8,449 | 43.2 | +12.7 | |
Majority | 2,661 | 13.6 | +11.5 | ||
Turnout | 19,559 | 64.5 | −8.5 | ||
Registered electors | 30,314 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +5.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Morley | 10,681 | 26.6 | −7.0 | |
Liberal | James Craig | 10,172 | 25.4 | N/A | |
Liberal Unionist | William Armstrong | 9,657 | 24.1 | New | |
Conservative | Matthew Ridley | 9,580 | 23.9 | −7.6 | |
Majority | 515 | 1.3 | −0.8 | ||
Turnout | 40,090 | 67.3 | −5.7 | ||
Registered electors | 30,314 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +0.3 | |||
Liberal gain from Independent Liberal | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1890s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Frederick Hamond | 13,823 | 39.0 | +15.1 | |
Liberal | John Morley | 10,905 | 30.8 | +4.2 | |
Liberal | James Craig | 10,686 | 30.2 | +4.8 | |
Majority | 3,137 | 8.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 24,537 (est) | 76.4 | +9.1 | ||
Registered electors | 32,117 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +5.5 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | −5.5 |
Morley is appointed Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Morley | 12,983 | 53.6 | −7.4 | |
Liberal Unionist | Pandeli Ralli | 11,244 | 46.4 | +7.4 | |
Majority | 1,739 | 7.2 | -1.6 | ||
Turnout | 24,227 | 75.4 | −1.0 | ||
Registered electors | 32,117 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −7.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Frederick Hamond | 12,833 | 25.4 | +5.9 | |
Conservative | William Cruddas | 12,170 | 24.2 | +4.7 | |
Liberal | John Morley | 11,862 | 23.6 | −7.2 | |
Liberal | James Craig | 11,154 | 22.2 | −8.0 | |
Ind. Labour Party | Fred Hammill | 2,302 | 4.6 | New | |
Majority | 308 | 0.6 | −8.2 | ||
Turnout | 25,769 (est) | 79.6 | +3.2 | ||
Registered electors | 32,373 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +6.7 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +6.0 | |||
Elections in the 1900s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Walter Richard Plummer | 15,097 | 29.7 | +4.3 | |
Conservative | George Renwick | 14,752 | 29.0 | +4.8 | |
Liberal | Samuel Storey | 10,488 | 20.7 | −2.9 | |
Liberal | Hedworth Lambton | 10,463 | 20.6 | −1.6 | |
Majority | 4,264 | 8.3 | +7.7 | ||
Turnout | 50,800 | 74.1 | −5.5 | ||
Registered electors | 34,690 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +3.6 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +3.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour Repr. Cmte. | Walter Hudson | 18,869 | 31.1 | New | |
Liberal | Thomas Cairns | 18,423 | 30.5 | +9.8 | |
Conservative | Walter Richard Plummer | 11,942 | 19.8 | −9.9 | |
Conservative | George Renwick | 11,223 | 18.6 | −10.4 | |
Turnout | 60,457 | 84.6 | +10.5 | ||
Registered electors | 36,909 | ||||
Majority | 6,927 | 11.3 | N/A | ||
Labour Repr. Cmte. gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Majority | 6,481 | 10.7 | N/A | ||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +9.9 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | George Renwick | 13,863 | 48.5 | +7.1 | |
Liberal | Edward Shortt | 11,720 | 41.1 | +10.6 | |
Social Democratic Federation | Edward Hartley | 2,971 | 10.4 | New | |
Majority | 2,143 | 7.4 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 28,554 | 76.4 | −8.2 | ||
Registered electors | 37,389 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | −1.8 | |||
Elections in the 1910s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Shortt | 18,779 | 28.9 | −1.6 | |
Labour | Walter Hudson | 18,241 | 28.1 | −3.0 | |
Conservative | Walter Richard Plummer | 14,067 | 21.6 | +1.8 | |
Conservative | George Renwick | 13,928 | 21.4 | +2.8 | |
Turnout | 65,015 | 86.1 | +1.5 | ||
Registered electors | 38,534 | ||||
Majority | 4,712 | 7.3 | −3.4 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −1.7 | |||
Majority | 4,174 | 6.5 | −4.8 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −2.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Shortt | 16,599 | 28.1 | −0.8 | |
Labour | Walter Hudson | 16,447 | 28.0 | −0.1 | |
Conservative | Edward Clark | 12,915 | 22.0 | +0.4 | |
Conservative | Jasper Nicholas Ridley | 12,849 | 21.9 | +0.5 | |
Turnout | 58,810 | 78.3 | −7.8 | ||
Majority | 3,684 | 6.1 | −1.2 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | −0.6 | |||
Majority | 3,532 | 6.0 | −0.5 | ||
Labour hold | Swing | −0.3 |
General Election 1914/15:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
- Liberal: Edward Shortt
- Labour: Walter Hudson
- Unionist: Walter Richard Plummer,[39] Nicholas Grattan-Doyle[40]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Edward Shortt | Unopposed | |||
Liberal hold |
Notes
- 'Newbottle - Newcastle-upon-Tyne', A Topographical Dictionary of England (1848), pp. 379-389. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=51171 Date accessed: 15 December 2008.
- Seymour Electoral Reform in England and Wales
- Craig Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885-1972
- Map in Craig Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885-1972
- "BISHOPDALE, William (d.1398), of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Northumb". History of Parliament. Retrieved 2 May 2014.
- "History of Parliament". Retrieved 5 October 2011.
- "History of Parliament". Retrieved 5 October 2011.
- "History of Parliament". Retrieved 5 October 2011.
- The 1727 election was disputed. As a result of an election petition, the House of Commons decided to seat Carr vice Blackett (who had died in 1728) in 1729.
- Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844-1850]. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. pp. 245–246. ISBN 0-900178-13-2.
- Churton, Edward (1836). The Assembled Commons or Parliamentary Biographer: 1836. pp. 133, 151. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
- Rapp, Dean (Spring 1982). "The Left-Wing Whigs: Whitbread, the Mountain and Reform, 1809-1815". The Journal of British Studies. 21 (2): 35–66. doi:10.1086/385789. JSTOR 175533.
- Richardson, M. A. (1843). The Local Historian's Table Book, of Remarkable Occurrences, Historical Facts, Traditions, Legendary and Descriptive Ballads, Connected with the Counties of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Northumberland and Durham. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: M. A. Richardson. p. 373. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
- Escott, Margaret (2009). "ORD, William (1781–1855), of Whitfield Hall, Northumb and 17 Berkeley Square, Mdx". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
- "The Northumberland Wig Shop 1826". The British Museum. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
- "A truly Noble brew on a journey back home". The Journal. 13 April 2007. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
- "Close of the Poll". Leeds Intelligencer. 31 July 1847. p. 5. Retrieved 9 June 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Newcastle-on-Tyne". Aberdeen Press and Journal. 7 July 1852. p. 5. Retrieved 9 June 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Purdue, A. W. (2012). Newcastle: The Biography. Stroud: Amberley Publishing. p. 174. ISBN 9781445609348. Retrieved 9 June 2018.
- "Bury and Norwich Post". 13 February 1856. pp. 1–2. Retrieved 9 June 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Namier and Brooke The House of Commons 1754-1790
- Escott, Margaret. "Newcastle-upon-Tyne". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
- "29 July 1837". Newcastle Journal. p. 2. Retrieved 19 April 2020 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Newcastle Election". Newcastle Journal. 29 July 1837. p. 4. Retrieved 19 April 2020 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Escott, Margaret. "HODGSON, John (1806-1869), of Elswick House, Northumb". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
- "Election Intelligence". Essex Standard. 25 August 1854. p. 4. Retrieved 14 May 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Election Intelligence". Hertford Mercury and Reformer. 26 August 1854. p. 2. Retrieved 14 May 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Walford, Edward (editor) (1857). Hardwicke's Annual biography. London: Robert Hardwicke. p. 59. Retrieved 9 June 2018.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
- "Electioneering Warfare". Newcastle Guardian and Tyne Mercury. 28 March 1857. p. 5. Retrieved 9 June 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Notice to the Freemen of Newcastle-on-Tyne". Newcastle Guardian and Tyne Mercury. 25 June 1859. p. 1. Retrieved 9 June 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "The Newcastle Election". Kendal Mercury. 10 November 1860. p. 5. Retrieved 6 March 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Political Intelligence". Maidstone Journal and Kentish Advertiser. 8 December 1860. p. 4. Retrieved 6 March 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Ecclesiastical Intelligence". Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser. 22 February 1883. p. 8. Retrieved 5 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- The Liberal Year Book, 1907
- Craig, FWS, ed. (1974). British Parliamentary Election Results: 1885-1918. London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 9781349022984.
- Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1901
- Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1916
- Newcastle Journal 3 Jun 1914
- Yorkshire Post and Leeds Intelligencer 14 Sep 1914
References
- Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885-1972, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Parliamentary Reference Publications 1972)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1977)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1885-1918, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1974)
- Electoral Reform in England and Wales, by Charles Seymour (David & Charles Reprints 1970)
- The House of Commons 1754-1790, by Sir Lewis Namier and John Brooke (HMSO 1964)
- The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844-50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F.W.S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832-1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume II 1886-1918, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1978)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "N" (part 1)