Political positions of the Republican Party

The platform of the Republican Party of the United States is generally based on American conservatism,[1][2][3] in contrast to the social liberalism of the Democrats. The party consists of moderates, sometimes described as establishment Republicans, and members of the Tea Party or Freedom Caucus, who have been described as populist, right-wing, and far-right.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] The party also incorporates several other factions, such as Libertarian Republicans, who advocate libertarian policies.

Not to be confused with Republicanism in the United States.

The positions of the Republican Party have evolved over time. Contemporarily, the party's economic conservatism involves support for lower taxes, free market capitalism, deregulation of corporations, and restrictions on labor unions. The party's social conservatism includes support for gun rights and other traditional values, often with a Christian foundation, including restrictions on abortion.[12] In foreign policy, Republicans usually favor increased military spending, unilateral action, and anti-Communist revolutions, especially during the 1980s and 1990s. Other Republican positions include restrictions on immigration, opposition to drug legalization, and support for school choice.

Economic policies

Republicans strongly believe that free markets and individual achievement are the primary factors behind economic prosperity. To this end, they advocate in favor of laissez-faire economics, fiscal conservatism, and eliminating government run welfare programs in favor of private sector nonprofits and encouraging personal responsibility.

A leading economic theory advocated by modern Republicans is supply side economics. Some fiscal policies influenced by this theory were popularly known as Reaganomics, a term popularized during the Ronald Reagan administration. This theory holds that reduced income tax rates increase GDP growth and thereby generate the same or more revenue for the government from the smaller tax on the extra growth.[13] This belief is reflected, in part, by the party's long-term advocacy of tax cuts. Many Republicans consider the income tax system to be inherently inefficient and oppose graduated tax rates, which they believe are unfairly targeted at those who create jobs and wealth. They also believe private spending is usually more efficient than government spending. Republicans generally oppose the estate tax.

Between the 19th century and the early-20th century, Republicans favored tariffs to protect and encourage American industry and industrial workers. In 1896, the GOP platform pledged to "renew and emphasize our allegiance to the policy of protection, as the bulwark of American industrial independence, and the foundation of development and prosperity. This true American policy taxes foreign products and encourages home industry. It puts the burden of revenue on foreign goods; it secures the American market for the American producer. It upholds the American standard of wages for the American workingman."

Republicans introduced and strongly supported the welfare reform of 1996, which was signed into law by President Bill Clinton and limited eligibility for welfare, successfully allowing many former welfare recipients to find jobs.[14][15]

The party opposes a government-run single-payer health care system, claiming it constitutes socialized medicine and is favors a personal or employer-based system of insurance, supplemented by Medicare for the elderly and Medicaid, which covers approximately 40% of the poor.[16] In 2003, Congress passed the Medicare Modernization Act with bipartisan support creating Medicare Part D covering prescription drugs. It was signed into law by President George W. Bush.

Republicans have a mixed record of supporting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Congressional Republicans and the Bush administration supported to reduce Medicaid's growth rate;[17] however, congressional Republicans expanded Medicare, supporting a new drug plan for seniors starting in 2006.

In 2011, House Republicans overwhelmingly voted for a proposal known as The Path to Prosperity and for major changes to Medicare, Medicaid, and the 2010 health care legislation known as Obamacare. Many Republicans support increased health insurance portability, laws promoting coverage of pre-existing medical conditions, a cap on malpractice lawsuits, implementing a streamlined electronic medical records system, an emphasis on preventative care rather than emergency room care, and tax benefits aimed to make health insurance more affordable for the uninsured and to promote universal access. They generally oppose government funding for elective abortions.[18]

Labor unions
Main article: Labor unions in the United States

Since the 1920s Republicans have generally been opposed to labor unions, which comprise a major component of the Democratic New Deal coalition. Although unions have lost membership in the private sector since the 1970s, they have gained among public sector unions (such as school teachers). Republicans at the state level generally support various right to work laws that weaken unions. At the national level Republicans supported the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, one of the most immensely anti-communist acts which gives workers the right not to participate in unions, as opposed to a closed shop, which prohibits workers from choosing not to join unions in workplaces. Most Republicans are opposed to increases in the minimum wage, believing that such increases hurt many businesses by forcing them to cut jobs and services, export jobs overseas, and raise the prices of goods to compensate for the decrease in profit. As Taylor Dark has emphasized in his analysis of the enduring alliance between labor unions and the Democrats, the unions' "most virulent opponents have moved into the Republican Party".[19]

Republicans elected with Tea Party support in 2010, most notably Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin, have launched major efforts against public sector unions due in part to state government pension obligations along with the allegation that the unions are too powerful.[20] Walker was challenged by a coalition of unions and Democrats, but beat back a recall effort and was reelected in 2014.[21]

Separation of powers and balance of powers

Many contemporary Republicans voice support of strict constructionism or textualism, the judicial philosophy that the Constitution should be interpreted narrowly and as close to the original intent as is practicable rather than a more flexible "living Constitution" model.[22] Most Republicans point to Roe v. Wade as a case of judicial activism, where the court overturned most laws restricting abortion on the basis of a right to privacy inferred from the Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Some Republicans have actively sought to block judges whom they see as being activist judges and have sought the appointment of judges who claim to practice judicial restraint. The issue of judicial deference to the legislature is a matter of some debate—like the Democrats, most Republicans criticize court decisions that overturn their own (conservative) legislation as overstepping bounds and support decisions that overturn opposing legislation. Some commentators have advocated that the Republicans take a more aggressive approach and support legislative supremacy more firmly.[23]

The Republican Party has supported various bills within the last decade to strip some or all federal courts of the ability to hear certain types of cases, in an attempt to strengthen the power of individual state's rights. These jurisdiction stripping laws have included removing federal review of the recognition of same-sex marriage with the Marriage Protection Act,[24] the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance with the Pledge Protection Act, and the rights of detainees in Guantanamo Bay in the Detainee Treatment Act. The Supreme Court overruled the last of these limitations in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.

Compared to Democrats, many Republicans believe in a more robust version of federalism with greater limitations placed upon federal authorities and a larger role reserved for those of the individual States. Following this view on federalism, Republicans often take a less expansive reading of congressional power under the Commerce Clause, such as in the opinion of William Rehnquist in United States v. Lopez. Many Republicans on the more libertarian wing wish for a more dramatic narrowing of Commerce Clause power by revisiting, among other cases, Wickard v. Filburn, a case that held that growing wheat on a farm for consumption on the same farm fell under congressional power to "regulate commerce ... among the several States".

President George W. Bush was a proponent of the unitary executive theory and cited it within his Signing statements about legislation passed by Congress.[25] The administration's interpretation of the unitary executive theory was called seriously into question by Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, where the Supreme Court ruled 5–3 that the President does not have sweeping powers to override or ignore laws through his power as commander in chief,[26] stating "the Executive is bound to comply with the Rule of Law that prevails."[27] Following the ruling, the Bush administration sought Congressional authorization for programs started only on executive mandate, as was the case with the Military Commissions Act, or abandoned programs it had previously asserted executive authority to enact, as in the case of the National Security Agency domestic wiretapping program.

States' rights

Ideologically, the GOP typically supports a smaller federal government. Historically, this translated into keeping power in the hands of powerful state governments, as in the cases of civil rights, abortion laws, regulations on marriage, and mapping of voting districts.[28] However, some conservatives in recent years have demanded federal intervention to oppose state laws with respect to the Federal Marriage Amendment, the Terri Schiavo case, the Kelo case regarding eminent domain, and in cases involving assisted suicide laws and medical marijuana.

To a certain extent, this is contingent upon the faction in question. For example, the paleoconservative and social conservative factions would be far more inclined to favor federal drug regulations trumping states rights, while the libertarian faction would be more inclined to see such power devolved to the states or even further.

Environmental policies
Main article: Environmental policy of the United States

Historically, more progressive leaders in the Republican party supported environmental protection. For example, Republican President Theodore Roosevelt was a prominent conservationist whose policies eventually led to the creation of the modern National Park Service.[29] Republican President Richard Nixon was responsible for establishing the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970.[30][31]

In 2006, Arnold Schwarzenegger, then the Republican Governor of California, signed into law a set of carbon emission regulations that were the country's first cap on greenhouse gases, and included vehicle emissions standards higher than those of the Federal Government. These regulations were opposed by the Bush administration.[32] President George W. Bush publicly opposed ratification of the Kyoto Protocols on the grounds that they unfairly targeted Western industrialized nations such as the United States while favoring major polluters such as China and India.[33]

Democrats (blue) and Republicans (red) have long differed in views of the importance of addressing climate change, with the gap widening in the late 2010s mainly through Democrats' share increasing by more than 30 points while Republican views changed relatively little.[34]
(Discontinuity resulted from survey changing in 2015 from reciting "global warming" to "climate change".)

In 2000, the Republican Party adopted as part of its platform support for the development of market-based solutions to environmental problems. According to the platform, "economic prosperity and environmental protection must advance together, environmental regulations should be based on science, the government's role should be to provide market-based incentives to develop the technologies to meet environmental standards, we should ensure that environmental policy meets the needs of localities, and environmental policy should focus on achieving results processes."[35]

The Bush administration,[36] along with several of the candidates that sought the Republican presidential nomination in 2008,[37][38][39] supported increased Federal investment into the development of clean alternative fuels, increased nuclear power, as well as fuels such as ethanol, as a way of helping the U.S. achieve energy independence, as opposed to supporting less use of carbon dioxide-producing methods of generating energy. The Republican party rejects cap-and-trade policy.[40] Some Republicans support increased oil drilling in protected areas such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,[41] a position that has drawn sharp criticism from some activists.

Republicans are deeply divided over the human causes of climate change and global warming.[42] Since 2008,[43] many members of the Republican Party have been criticized for being anti-environmentalist[44][45][46] and promoting climate change denial[47][48][49] in opposition to the general scientific consensus, making them unique even among other worldwide conservative parties.[49]

Younger Republicans express higher levels of concern about climate change. When the College Republican National Committee proposed an anti-carbon tax resolution at its 2019 annual meeting, 25 presidents of state-wide college Republican groups responded by forming "an advocacy organization to lobby Congress for conservative solutions to the climate crisis."[50]

Green conservatism manifested itself as a movement in groups such as ConservAmerica, which seeks to strengthen the Republican Party's stance on environmental issues and support efforts to conserve natural resources and protect human and environmental health.[51]

Social policies

The Republican Party is generally associated with social conservative policies, although it does have dissenting centrist and libertarian factions. The social conservatives want laws that uphold their traditional values, such as opposition to same-sex marriage, abortion, and marijuana.[52] Most conservative Republicans also oppose gun control, affirmative action, and illegal immigration.[52][53]

Abortion and embryonic stem cell research

A majority of the party's national and state candidates are at the very least moderately anti-abortion and oppose elective abortion on religious or moral grounds. However, many hold exceptions in the case of incest, rape or the mother's life being at risk while others may accept early stage abortions (firmly opposing "partial birth" abortion still). When Congress voted on the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act in 2003, Congressional Republicans voted overwhelmingly to support the ban.

Although Republicans have voted for increases in government funding of scientific research, some members actively oppose the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research beyond the original lines because it involves the destruction of human embryos, while arguing for applying research money into adult stem cell or amniotic stem cell research.[54][55][56] The stem cell issue has garnered two vetoes on research funding bills from President Bush, who said the research "crossed a moral boundary".

The text of the 2012 party platform specifically stated that "the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed." It also opposed using public revenues to promote abortions, to perform them, or to fund organizations that do either such things.[57]

Not all Republicans support abortion restrictions and the human life amendment. Though anti-abortion planks have been part of the party platform since 1976.,[58] before 1988 there was little difference between Republicans and other voters regarding abortion, and in 2015, 40 percent of Republicans supported legal abortion.[59] Despite their divergence from the party platform, pro-abortion rights Republicans are unlikely to switch parties.[60] Pro-abortion rights ideology has been present in the Republican Party since before the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, and the pro-abortion rights ideology is still present today.

According to some pro-abortion rights Republican groups, the Republican belief in limited government and individualism should extend to social issues, such as abortion rights.[61] Research indicates that supporters of pro-abortion rights Republican organizations are motivated by libertarianism.[62] Supporters of pro-abortion rights organizations may hold less conservative views on abortion, but tend to hold relatively conservative views on other political issues.[63]

Pro-abortion rights ideology and support for abortion rights ranges. The 1992 American National Election study asked respondents about their support for the legal rights of abortion. Respondents either believe abortion should only be allowed in cases of rape, incest, and to save the mother's life, abortion should be allowed if there is a "clear need," or that abortion should not be restricted in any way.[64]

There are several organizations and Political Action Committees that support pro-abortion rights republican candidates. The most prominent are Republican Majority for Choice, Republicans for Choice, and The Wish List. These organizations provide money, endorsements, and training to candidates who support abortion rights. Republican Main Street Partnership has shown support for pro-abortion rights legislation.

The Republican Party's shift to an anti-abortion stance was a gradual change and was not caused by one election or event.[65]

1970s and 1980s

Early abortion laws only allowed the procedure when the woman's life was in danger. At this time many Republicans and Democrats as well were for less strict abortion laws.[66] Between 1974 and 1978, studies showed that political ideology had a very weak correlation with support for abortion rights. The correlation between political party identification and support for abortion rights was even weaker.[67] Mary Louise Smith, the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee from 1974 to 1977, was pro-abortion rights.[66] Justice Blackmun wrote the Supreme Courts decision on Roe v. Wade. Blackmun had been conservative Justice appointed by President Nixon, who came out against abortion.[66] After Roe v. Wade, though, Blackmun gradually evolved into a liberal. Some say this issue was the symbolic move of Blackmun to becoming a liberal.

During his presidency, President Gerald R. Ford took a moderately conservative stance on abortion, despite First Lady Betty Ford's urges for him to take a liberal stance on the issue. Ford believed abortions should be allowed in certain circumstances, such as rape and incest, and opposed a human life amendment to the Constitution.[66] After winning the primary, Ford stated he was also unconditionally anti-abortion and fully supported the Republican platform in 1976. Still, Ford later stated that he was pro-abortion rights after he had left office[68] and Betty Ford was supportive of the decision made by the court in Roe v. Wade.[66]

The 1976 Republican Party Platform was the first to include an anti-abortion stance. This came during the same year that the Hyde Amendment Was passed.[69] Ronald Reagan's run in the primary for the nomination played a role in getting an anti abortion plank along with some other positions on other issues into the platform.

Democrat and Republican Party elites and elected officials became more divided on the issue of abortion in the 1980s. Still, Ronald Reagan ran and won the election in 1980, stating he was against all abortions except for saving the life of the mother. He firmly supported Roe v. Wade being overturned and a constitutional amendment banning abortion. Robert Dole, who ran in the primary for president in 1980, also firmly opposed abortion. George H.W. Bush, who also ran in the primary, was firmly pro-abortion rights. Bush wound up being Reagan's vice presidential running mate and after that, he distanced himself from that issue. It was not until after Republicans in Congress started consistently voting against abortion in the 1980s that polls showed Republican opposition to abortion.[70]

1990 to Current

Until 1988 there was little difference in pro-abortion rights attitudes among Democrat and Republican voters.[71] Also, George H.W. Bush, shifted his position on abortion. He stated after some reflection he came to the conclusion abortion was morally wrong and should only be legal for rape, incest, and to save the life of the mother. He also chose Dan Quayle as his running mate who also opposed abortion. Bush stated his position evolved while he was vice president. While running, Bush promised strict constructionist judges (Like Reagan, Ford, and Nixon all promised) who interpret not make laws. This is considered code language for overturning Roe Vs Wade. Bush did state though he would not use abortion as a litmus test for judges (like Reagan did). Though Bush did appoint one anti Roe judge (as did Reagan and Nixon though Nixon's appointments were made prior to abortion becoming an issue)

During the 1992 election, President Bush and Vice President Quayle tended to downplay the importance of abortion during the election so they would not risk turning away Republican voters who supported abortion rights.[72] A substantial number of Pro-abortion rights republicans in the 1992 election did not vote for President Bush because of his stance on abortion. Most of these pro-abortion rights Republicans voted for Perot.[72] While President Bush and the Republican Party took an anti-abortion stance in 1992, First Lady Barbara Bush stated that she believed abortion to be a "personal choice." [73]

In an interview in 2001, First Lady Laura Bush stated that she believed Roe v. Wade should not be overturned[74] and later stated that abortion should remain legal because she believes "it's important for people, for medical reasons and other reasons."[75] George W Bush though stated he was still anti-abortion and while he would be appointing conservative judges abortion would not be used as a litmus test.

In 2005, The Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act was passed by congress with the help of the Republican Main Street Partnership. However, President George W. Bush vetoed this legislation in 2006.[76]

After the 2012 election, Senator John McCain, who is anti-abortion, advised his fellow Republicans to "leave the issue [abortion] alone." He warned against going beyond stating one's anti-abortion belief and actions could hurt the Republican party with women voters and young voters.[77] Like Bush I & II, Dole, Reagan, and Ford, McCain promised conservative constructionist judges but again stated he would not use abortion as a litmus test. Mitt Romney as governor of Massachusetts was firmly pro-abortion rights but he became anti-abortion running for president in 2012 and stated the same thing about conservative judges but not using abortion as a litmus test. In 2016, though Donald Trump abruptly shifted his position on abortion. For decades as a Democrat and independent he was firmly pro-abortion rights. When he began running for president in 2015, he also was pro-abortion rights. But as it seemed more apparent he would get the nomination, he too shifted to an anti-abortion stance. By the summer, Trump was also anti-abortion. Unlike the previous candidates, Trump made a promise during his debate with Hillary to appoint "pro life judges" to the US Supreme Court as well as to lower courts. He later had to take that statement back saying he was not even allowed to ask a judge what his personal position on abortion or any other issue was. He still affirmed he would appoint judges that interpret the law not make law and on abortion they would hopefully see it as a constitutional issue turning the rulings over to the states and overturning Roe. Trump did state he believed in exceptions of rape and incest as well as to saving the life of the mother on his anti abortion stance.

Civil rights

Republicans, especially Republican women, are generally against affirmative action for women and some minorities, often describing it as a 'quota system', and believing that it is not meritocratic and that it is counter-productive socially by only further promoting discrimination. Many Republicans support race-neutral admissions policies in universities, but support taking into account the socioeconomic status of the student.[78][79]

Gun ownership

Republicans generally support gun ownership rights and oppose laws regulating guns and other related topic areas such as bump stocks and large-capacity magazines.[80] However, recently, some moderate Republicans have started to be an exception to this. On the evening of Wednesday, November 28, 2018, President Donald Trump announced that his administration would be banning bump stocks.[81] Some Republicans support this and some do not, causing some divide within the party.

Drugs
See also: Illegal drug trade in the United States

Republicans have historically supported the War on Drugs and oppose the legalization of drugs.[82][83] In recent years, the opposition to the legalization of marijuana is not as strong as it used to be, with some Republicans members of Congress advocating for decriminalization or legalization of marijuana, as well as criminal justice reform in the context of drug crimes.[82][84]

Education

Most Republicans support school choice through charter schools and school vouchers for private schools; many have denounced the performance of the public school system and the teachers' unions. The party has insisted on a system of greater accountability for public schools, most prominently in recent years with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The act received bi-partisan support in Congress and was signed by President George W. Bush. Many Republicans, however, opposed the creation of the United States Department of Education when it was initially created in 1979.[85]

LGBT issues
See also: Log Cabin Republicans

The Republican platform, as of 2016, is officially opposed to same-sex marriage and other LGBT rights.[86][87]

Groups advocating for LGBT issues inside the party include the Log Cabin Republicans, Young Conservatives for the Freedom to Marry, and College Republicans.

In the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges that ended bans on same-sex marriage nationwide, the Republican Party is divided as to whether to accept the ruling or to fight it by measures such as a possible amendment to the Constitution. Individuals such as 2016 Presidential candidates Ted Cruz and Scott Walker have supported an amendment to re-expand government and re-ban same-sex marriages, while other Republican figures such as Jeb Bush (also a 2016 Presidential candidate) have disagreed.[88] The 2016 platform, however, condemned the Supreme Court's ruling and defined marriage as "natural marriage, the union of one man and one woman."[89]

A November/December 2013 Public Religion Research Institute poll sponsored by the Ford Foundation found that Republicans are divided in their perceptions of their own party: 45% think Republicans are friendly toward LGBT people, while 41% think the party is unfriendly toward them.[90]

The 1992 Republican presidential platform was the first to oppose same-sex marriage.[91]

A May 2012 poll found that 37% of Republicans supported a constitutional amendment defining marriage between a man and a woman.[92] A November/December 2013 poll found that 63% of Republicans believe same-sex marriage should be left up to individual states to decide.[90] In 2017, Pew Research polling found that for the first time a majority of Republicans weren't opposed to same-sex marriage, with 48% against and 47% in favour.[93]

Military service

Republicans, in general, tend to be more pro-military than their Democrat counterparts,[94] however, the factions of the Republican party do not see eye-to-eye on this. Neoconservative Republicans and subscribers to other such ideologies tend to advocate for more interventionist foreign policies, a bigger military, and using the military to promote American values around the world, while the more libertarian and paleoconservative factions of the party advocate for non-interventionism. Libertarian Republicans call for less government spending on defense,[95] but paleoconservatives usually are pro-strong national defense, and therefore sometimes are in favor of more defense spending.[96]

The 1992 Republican Party platform adopted support for continuing to exclude homosexuals from the military as a matter of good order and discipline.[91] The support for the exclusion of homosexuals from military service would remain in the Republican Party platform until the 2012 Republican Party platform, which removed that language from it.[97]

A May 2012 United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll found that only 41% of Republicans supported restoring the prohibition against gays serving openly in the military.[92]

Anti-discrimination laws

The 1992 Republican Party platform adopted opposition to including sexual preference into anti-discrimination statutes.[91] The 2000 Republican Party platform included the statement: "We support the First Amendment right of freedom of association and stand united with private organizations, such as the Boy Scouts of America, and support their positions."[98] The 2004 Republican Party platform removed both parts of that language from the platform and stated that the party supports anti-discrimination legislation.[99] The 2008 and 2012 Republican Party platform supported anti-discrimination statues based on sex, race, age, religion, creed, disability, or national origin, but both platforms were silent on sexual orientation and gender identity.[97][100]

A November/December 2013 Public Religion Research Institute poll sponsored by the Ford Foundation found that 61% of Republicans support laws protecting gay and lesbian people against employment discrimination, with only 33% opposing such laws.[90] A 2007 Gallup poll showed 60% of Republicans supported expanding federal hate crime laws to include sexual orientation and gender identity, with only 30% opposing such laws.[101]

Foreign aid

The 2012 Republican Party platform opposes the Obama administration from attempting to impose what it considers a "cultural agenda", including a "homosexual rights agenda" in other countries by restricting foreign aid.[97] However, Republicans themselves have also frequently advocated for restricting foreign aid as a means of asserting the national security and immigration interests of the United States.[102][103][104]

Civil Rights — United States Citizens in Puerto Rico

The 2016 Republican Party Platform declares: "We support the right of the United States citizens of Puerto Rico to be admitted to the Union as a fully sovereign state. We further recognize the historic significance of the 2012 local referendum in which a 54 percent majority voted to end Puerto Rico's current status as a U.S. territory, and 61 percent chose statehood over options for sovereign nationhood. We support the federally sponsored political status referendum authorized and funded by an Act of Congress in 2014 to ascertain the aspirations of the people of Puerto Rico. Once the 2012 local vote for statehood is ratified, Congress should approve an enabling act with terms for Puerto Rico's future admission as the 51st state of the Union".[105]

Foreign policy and national defense

Republicans supported Woodrow Wilson's call for American entry into World War I in 1917, complaining only that he was too slow to go to war. Republicans in 1919 opposed his call for entry into the League of Nations. A majority supported the League with reservations; a minority opposed membership on any terms. Republicans sponsored world disarmament in the 1920s, and isolationism in the 1930s.[106] Most Republicans staunchly opposed intervention in World War II until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. By 1945, however, internationalists became dominant in the party which supported the Cold War policies such as the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and NATO.

Neoconservatives
Main article: Neoconservatism

Many intellectual liberal Democrats in the 1960s and 1970s who became disenchanted with the leftward movement of their party often became "neoconservatives" ("neocons").[107] Many became politically prominent during the five presidential terms under Reagan, and the father-son presidency from the Bush family. They played a major role in promoting and planning the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[108] Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, while not identifying themselves as neoconservatives, listened closely to neoconservative advisers regarding foreign policy, especially the defense of Israel, the promotion of democracy in the Middle East, and the buildup of American military forces to achieve these goals. Neocons show a preference for unilateral American activism, along with skepticism regarding the United Nations. The neocons had little influence in the Obama White House, but neoconservatism remains a staple in Republican Party arsenal.[109]

Public opinion on foreign policy

In June 2014 the Quinnipiac Poll asked Americans which foreign policy they preferred:

A) The United States is doing too much in other countries around the world, and it is time to do less around the world and focus more on our own problems here at home. B) The United States must continue to push forward to promote democracy and freedom in other countries around the world because these efforts make our own country more secure.

Democrats chose A over B by 65%-32%; Republicans chose A over B by 56% to 39%; Independents chose A over B by 67% to 29%.[110]

Policies

As a result, some in the Republican Party support unilateralism on issues of national security, believing in the ability and right of the United States to act without external support in matters of its national defense. In general, Republican thinking on defense and international relations is heavily influenced by the theories of neorealism and realism, characterizing conflicts between nations as struggles between faceless forces of international structure, as opposed to being the result of the ideas and actions of individual leaders. The realist school's influence shows in Reagan's Evil Empire stance on the Soviet Union and George W. Bush's Axis of evil.

Republicans secured gains in the 2002 and 2004 elections, with the War on Terror being one of the top issues favoring them. Since the September 11, 2001 attacks, some in the party support neoconservative policies with regard to the War on Terror, including the 2001 war in Afghanistan and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The doctrine of preemptive war, wars to disarm and destroy potential military foes based on speculation of future attacks rather than in defense against actual attack, has been advocated by prominent members of the Bush administration, but the war within Iraq has undercut the influence of this doctrine within the Republican Party. Rudy Giuliani, mayor of New York at the time of the September 11 terrorist attacks, and a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, has stated his support for that policy, saying America must keep itself "on the offensive" against terrorists.

The George W. Bush administration took the position that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to unlawful combatants, saying they apply to soldiers serving in the armies of nation states and not terrorist organizations such as Al-Qaeda. The Supreme Court overruled this position in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which held that the Geneva Conventions were legally binding and must be followed in regards to all enemy combatants. Some prominent Republicans such as John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Ted Cruz and Ron Paul strongly oppose the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, which they view as torture.[111]

History
Main article: History of foreign policy and national defense in the Republican Party

Other international policies

Canada

Republicans support the construction of the Keystone Pipeline, which would connect the Athabasca oil sands in Canada to refineries in the United States. American and Canadian environmentalists have strongly opposed the pipeline's construction, although the Canadian government has lobbied for it.[112]

Israel

The Republican Party generally supports a strong alliance with Israel and efforts to secure peace in the Middle East between Israel and its Arab neighbors.[113][114]

Russia

The Republican party argues that with Russia, the U.S must show resilience and patience. It also argues that Russia must stop encouraging the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.[115] The party stresses the common interests of the two countries, which include ending terrorism, combating nuclear proliferation, promoting bilateral trade.[116] Leading Republicans have been split on how to respond to the Russian military interventions in Ukraine and Syria, with some advocating a more hawkish approach, and others urging a more cautious and conciliatory response.[117]

Trade

The party, through former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, has advocated reforms in the United Nations to halt corruption such as that which afflicted the Oil-for-Food Program. Most Republicans oppose the Kyoto Protocol. The party promotes free trade agreements, most notably North American Free Trade Agreement (and its comprehensive update, the US Mexico Canada Agreement), Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement and an effort to go further south to Brazil, Peru and Colombia, although some have a protectionist view of trade.

Immigration
See also: Immigration to the United States and Illegal immigration to the United States

Republicans are divided on how to confront illegal immigration between a platform that allows for migrant workers and easing citizenship guidelines, and border enforcement-first approach. In general, pro-growth advocates within the Republican Party and it support more immigration, and traditional or populist conservatives oppose it. In 2006, the White House supported and Republican-led Senate passed comprehensive immigration reform that would eventually allow millions of illegal immigrants to become citizens, but the House, also led by Republicans, took an enforcement-first approach, and the bill failed to pass the conference committee.[118]

Lately, after the defeat in the 2012 presidential elections, and considering the low percent of Latino Americans that voted for Republicans, several Republicans are advocating a friendlier approach to immigrants. Former U.S. Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez is promoting the creation of a SuperPAC for immigration reform.[119]

Proposals calling for systematic reform of the U.S. immigration system such that residents that have come into the U.S. illegally have a pathway to legal citizenship have attracted broad Republican support in some polls. For example, the Public Religion Research Institute found in late 2013 that 60% of Republicans supported the pathway concept, compared to 63% of Americans as a whole.[120]

Lack of platform in 2020
Main article: Republican reactions to Donald Trump's claims of 2020 election fraud
See also: Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election

In 2020, the Republican Party decided not to write a platform for that presidential election cycle,[121] instead simply expressing its support for Donald Trump's agenda[122] and criticizing "the media" for biased reporting.[123] This was cited by critics as an example of how the Republican Party "became a cult of personality".[124][125]

See also

References
  1. Grigsby, Ellen (2008). Analyzing Politics: An Introduction to Political Science. Florence: Cengage Learning. pp. 106–7. ISBN 978-0-495-50112-1. In the United States, the Democratic Party represents itself as the liberal alternative to the Republicans, but its liberalism is for the most the later version of liberalism—modern liberalism.
  2. Arnold, N. Scott (2009). Imposing values: an essay on liberalism and regulation. Florence: Oxford University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-495-50112-1. Modern liberalism occupies the left-of-center in the traditional political spectrum and is represented by the Democratic Party in the United States.
  3. Levy, Jonah (2006). The state after statism: new state activities in the age of liberalization. Florence: Harvard University Press. p. 198. ISBN 978-0-495-50112-1. In the corporate governance area, the center-left repositioned itself to press for reform.
  4. French, Lauren (March 14, 2016). "House Freedom Caucus to break with leadership on budget". Politico. Retrieved July 14, 2016. Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price of Georgia and Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) have labored to gain the support of the far-right caucus
  5. Newhauser, Daniel (June 24, 2015). "Boehner-vs.-Freedom-Caucus Battle Escalates". National Journal. Retrieved July 22, 2015.
  6. Sullivan, Sean (March 4, 2015). "Insurgent bloc of House conservatives proving to be a thorn in Boehner's side". Washington Post. Retrieved July 22, 2015.
  7. Thrush, Glenn (March 25, 2017). "Trump Becomes Ensnared in Fiery G.O.P. Civil War". New York Times.
  8. Fabian, Jordan (March 30, 2017). "Trump on the warpath against Freedom Caucus". The Hill. Archived from the original on July 5, 2017. Retrieved November 19, 2017.
  9. Woolf, Nicky (October 7, 2015). "Republicans in Freedom Caucus support Florida conservative as speaker". The Guardian.
  10. DiMaggio, Anthony (November 1, 2012). The Rise of the Tea Party. NYU Press. p. 57. ISBN 9781583673065.
  11. "Tea Party goes cold as US voters reject the far right". The Conversation. November 8, 2012. Retrieved 15 October 2017.
  12. Paul Gottfried, Conservatism in America: Making Sense of the American Right, p. 9, "Postwar conservatives set about creating their own synthesis of free-market capitalism, Christian morality, and the global struggle against Communism." (2009); Gottfried, Theologies and moral concern (1995) p. 12
  13. "Diving into the rich pool". The Economist. 2011-09-24. Retrieved 2012-01-13.
  14. "Welfare Reforms Reduce Poverty" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-06-23. |archive-url= is malformed: timestamp (help)
  15. "Welfare Reforms Reduce Welfare Dependence" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-06-23. |archive-url= is malformed: timestamp (help)
  16. Unsettling Scores: A Ranking of State Medicaid Programs, p. 15
  17. Wachino, V (2005-03-10). "The House Budget Committee's Proposed Medicaid and SCHIP Cuts Are Larger Than Those The Administration Proposed". Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved 2006-11-18.
  18. "Bobby Jindal on the Issues". Ontheissues.org. Retrieved 2010-05-16.
  19. Taylor E. Dark (2001). The Unions and the Democrats: An Enduring Alliance. Cornell University Press. p. 137. ISBN 978-0801487330.
  20. Nelson Lichtenstein, "Can This Election Save the Unions?", Dissent Summer 2012.
  21. Jason Stein and Patrick Marley, More than They Bargained For: Scott Walker, Unions, and the Fight for Wisconsin (2013).
  22. "Supreme Court". The New York Times. September 5, 2008. Retrieved 2011-09-05.
  23. McCarthy, AC. "Judicial Restraint". National Review. Archived from the original on 2013-01-29. Retrieved 2010-06-17.
  24. "House to debate court stripping". The Washington Times. 2004-07-22. Retrieved 2010-06-17.
  25. Savage, Charlie (2006-04-30). "Bush challenges hundreds of laws". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2011-09-05.
  26. Cole, D. "Why The Court Said No". New York Review of Books. Retrieved 2010-06-17.
  27. Opinion of the court, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, p. 72
  28. Merle Black and Earl Black, The Rise of Southern Republicans (2003)
  29. Filler, Daniel. "Theodore Roosevelt: Conservation as the Guardian of Democracy". Archived from the original on 2003-08-02. Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  30. Nixon, Richard (1970-07-09). "Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970". Archived from the original on 2013-05-15. Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  31. "Conservatives Before and After Earth Day". THE REPUBLICAN REVERSAL. Retrieved 2019-01-18.
  32. "Schwarzenegger takes center stage on warming". NBC News. MSNBC News. 27 September 2006. Retrieved 3 July 2014.
  33. Bush, George W. (2001-03-13). "Text of a Letter from the President". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  34. "As Economic Concerns Recede, Environmental Protection Rises on the Public's Policy Agenda / Partisan gap on dealing with climate change gets even wider". PewResearch.org. Pew Research Center. 13 February 2020. Archived from the original on 16 January 2021.
  35. "Encourage Market-Based Solutions to Environmental Problems". OnTheIssues. 2000-08-12.
  36. "Fact Sheet: Harnessing the Power of Technology for a Secure Energy Future". 2007-02-22. Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  37. Kudlow & Company (2007-03-26). "Interview with Rudy Giuliani". Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  38. "Issue Watch: Achieving Energy Independence". Archived from the original on 2007-11-07. Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  39. "The Candidates: Rep. Duncan Hunter". The Washington Post. 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2007-11-09.
  40. "Our GOP: The Party of Opportunity". Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  41. John Collins Rudolf (December 6, 2010). "On Our Radar: Republicans Urge Opening of Arctic Refuge to Drilling". The New York Times. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  42. "GOP Deeply Divided Over Climate Change". PewResearch Center for the People & the Press. November 1, 2013. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  43. Davenport, Coral; Lipton, Eric (June 3, 2017). "How G.O.P. Leaders Came to View Climate Change as Fake Science". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved September 22, 2017. The Republican Party's fast journey from debating how to combat human-caused climate change to arguing that it does not exist is a story of big political money, Democratic hubris in the Obama years and a partisan chasm that grew over nine years like a crack in the Antarctic shelf, favoring extreme positions and uncompromising rhetoric over cooperation and conciliation.
  44. Shabecoff, Philip (2000). Earth Rising: American Environmentalism in the 21st Century. Island Press. p. 125. ISBN 9781597263351. Retrieved 9 November 2017. republican party anti-environmental.
  45. Hayes, Samuel P. (2000). A History of Environmental Politics Since 1945. University of Pittsburgh Press. p. 119. ISBN 9780822972242. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
  46. Sellers, Christopher (7 June 2017). "How Republicans came to embrace anti-environmentalism". Vox. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
  47. Dunlap, Riley E.; McCright, Araon M. (7 August 2010). "A Widening Gap: Republican and Democratic Views on Climate Change". Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 50 (5): 26–35. doi:10.3200/ENVT.50.5.26-35. S2CID 154964336.
  48. Båtstrand, Sondre (2015). "More than Markets: A Comparative Study of Nine Conservative Parties on Climate Change". Politics and Policy. 43 (4): 538–561. doi:10.1111/polp.12122. ISSN 1747-1346. S2CID 143331308. The U.S. Republican Party is an anomaly in denying anthropogenic climate change.
  49. Chait, Jonathan (September 27, 2015). "Why Are Republicans the Only Climate-Science-Denying Party in the World?". New York. Retrieved September 20, 2017. Of all the major conservative parties in the democratic world, the Republican Party stands alone in its denial of the legitimacy of climate science. Indeed, the Republican Party stands alone in its conviction that no national or international response to climate change is needed. To the extent that the party is divided on the issue, the gap separates candidates who openly dismiss climate science as a hoax, and those who, shying away from the political risks of blatant ignorance, instead couch their stance in the alleged impossibility of international action.
  50. Wilmer, Michael; Dumain, Emma (February 14, 2020). "Courting young conservatives, Republicans speed up their 'evolution' on climate change". Miami Herald. Retrieved February 15, 2020.
  51. James, Frank (22 April 2014). "Green GOP Group Caught Between 'Rock And A Hard Place'". npr. Retrieved 28 June 2015.
  52. Zelizer, Julian E. (2004). The American Congress: The Building of Democracy. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. pp. 704–5. ISBN 9780547345505.
  53. Chapman, Roger (2010). Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints, and Voices. M. E. Sharpe. p. passim. ISBN 9780765622501.
  54. Stem cells: What they are and what they do. MayoClinic.com (2013-03-23). Retrieved on 2013-07-15.
  55. Watson, Stephanie. (2004-11-11) HowStuffWorks "Embryonic Stem Cells". Science.howstuffworks.com. Retrieved on 2013-07-15.
  56. Archived 2016-07-29 at the Wayback Machine FAQs [Stem Cell Information]. Stemcells.nih.gov. Retrieved on 2013-07-15.
  57. GOP OKs platform barring abortions, gay marriage retrieved 31 October 2012
  58. "A Rebirth of Constitutional Government | GOP". GOP. Retrieved 2016-12-20.
  59. "AP-GfK Poll: Support for legal abortion at highest level in 2 years | Associated Press GfK Poll". ap-gfkpoll.com. Retrieved 2016-12-20.
  60. Killian, Mitchell (2008). "Do Abortion Attitudes Lead to Party Switching?". Political Research Quarterly. 61 (4): 561–573. doi:10.1177/1065912907312981. S2CID 153780945.
  61. "Republican Majority for Choice | ABOUT RMC". www.gopchoice.org. Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2016-12-20.
  62. Day, Christine L.; Hadley, Chales D.; Duffy Brown, Megan (2001). "Gender, Feminism, and Partisanship among Women's PAC Contributors". Social Science Quarterly. 82 (4): 687–700. doi:10.1111/0038-4941.00053. S2CID 143250347.
  63. Day, Christine L.; Hadley, Charles D. (2001). "Feminist Diversity: The Policy Preferences of Women's PAC Contributors". Political Research Quarterly. 54 (3): 673–686. doi:10.2307/449276. JSTOR 449276.
  64. Abramowitz, Alan (1995). "It's Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election". The Journal of Politics. 57 (1): 176–186. doi:10.2307/2960276. JSTOR 2960276. S2CID 155087138.
  65. Adams, Greg D. (1997). "Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution". American Journal of Political Science. 41 (3): 718–737. doi:10.2307/2111673. JSTOR 2111673.
  66. Williams, Daniel K. (2011). "The GOP's Abortion Strategy: Why Pro-Choice Republicans Became Pro-Life in the 1970s". Journal of Policy History. 23 (4): 513–539. doi:10.1017/s0898030611000285. S2CID 154353515.
  67. Granberg, Donald (1980). "Abortion Attitudes, 1965-1980: Trends and Determinants". Family Planning Perspectives. 12 (5): 250–261. doi:10.2307/2134868. JSTOR 2134868. PMID 7439350.
  68. Frankovich, Nicholas (2016). "The Republican Party Cools Its Ambivalent Romance with the Pro-life Movement". The Human Life Review. 42: 31–42.
  69. Karrer, Robert N. (2011). "The Pro-Life Movement and Its First Years under Roe". American Catholic Studies. 122: 47–72.
  70. Siegel, Reva B.; Greenhouse, Linda. "Before (and After) Roe v. Wade: New Questions About Backlash". Retrieved 2016-12-16 – via Yale Law Journal.
  71. Carmines, Edward G.; Woods, James (2002). "The Role of Party Activists in the Evolution of the Abortion Issue". Political Behavior. 24 (4): 361–377. doi:10.1023/a:1022510927796. S2CID 140946984.
  72. Abramowitz, Alan I. (1995). "It's Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election". The Journal of Politics. 57 (1): 176–186. doi:10.2307/2960276. JSTOR 2960276. S2CID 155087138.
  73. Hadley, Janet (1994). "God's Bullies: Attacks on Abortion". Feminist Review. 48 (1): 94–113. doi:10.1057/fr.1994.44. PMID 12290677. S2CID 7114249.
  74. "Laura Bush Speaks Out on Abortion". ABC News. 2006-01-06. Retrieved 2016-12-18.
  75. "Laura Bush Supports Gay Marriage, Abortion". ABC News. 2010-05-13. Retrieved 2016-12-18.
  76. Smith, Alexander Thomas T. "Faith, science and the political imagination: moderate Republicans and the politics of embryonic stem cell research". The Sociological Review: 623–637.
  77. Woodruff, Betsy (2015-01-22). "Why the GOP Isn't as Pro-Life as You Think". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved 2016-12-18.
  78. "Bush criticizes university 'quota system'". CNN. 2003-01-15. Retrieved 2010-05-22.
  79. Eilperin, Juliet (1998-05-12). "Watts Walks a Tightrope on Affirmative Action". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-01-22.
  80. "Gun Rights vs. Gun Control | Pew Research Center".
  81. Rogers, Katie (2018-11-29). "Trump Administration is Set to Ban Bump Stock Devices on Guns". The New York Times.
  82. Kneeland, Timothy W. (2016-07-01). Today's Social Issues: Democrats and Republicans: Democrats and Republicans. ABC-CLIO. p. 206. ISBN 978-1-61069-836-8.
  83. "Republican Views on Drugs | Republican Views". www.republicanviews.org. Archived from the original on May 2, 2017. Retrieved May 1, 2017.
  84. Greg Newburn (July 18, 2014). "Top GOP Presidential Contenders Support Mandatory Minimum Reform". Families Against Mandatory Minimums. Archived from the original on November 29, 2014. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  85. "Why Republicans have long wanted to shut Education Department".
  86. "GOP state platforms support civil unions - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
  87. "Log Cabin Republicans: GOP Platform the 'Most Anti-LGBT' in Party's History". ABC News. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
  88. Woodruff, Betsy (June 26, 2015). "GOP Field Split on Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment". The Daily Beast. Retrieved August 28, 2015.
  89. "Republican Party Platform". GOP. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
  90. "A Shifting Landscape" (PDF).
  91. "Republican Party Platforms: Republican Party Platform of 1992".
  92. "Public Opposes Gay Weddings at Military Facilities". National Journal. May 21, 2012.
  93. Lopez, German (2017-06-26). "Slowly but surely, Republicans are coming around to same-sex marriage". Vox. Retrieved 2020-05-13.
  94. "Comparing the Democrat and Republican Platforms on Military Issues". 2016-07-26.
  95. http://libertarianpapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/post/2017/09/lp-9-2-3-1.pdf
  96. "Conservatism, Paleoconservatism, and Neoconservatism | CAIRCO - Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform | issues legislation projects research".
  97. "Republican Party Platform of 2012" (PDF).
  98. "Republican Party Platforms: Republican Party Platform of 2000".
  99. "Republican Party Platform of 2004" (PDF).
  100. "Republican Party Platforms: 2008 Republican Party Platform".
  101. "Public Favors Expansion of Hate Crime Law to Include Sexual Orientation". Gallup. May 17, 2007. Retrieved May 1, 2013.
  102. Erik Wasson (July 18, 2013). "House GOP unveils spending bill with $5.8B cut to foreign aid". The Hill. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  103. David Rogers (February 1, 2011). "GOP seeks to slash foreign aid". Politico. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  104. Mario Trujillo (July 1, 2014). "Republicans propose halting foreign aid until border surge stops". The Hill. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  105. "Republican Platform 2016" (PDF). Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  106. Alex Goodall, "US Foreign Relations under Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover," in Katherine A.S. Sibley, ed., A Companion to Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover (2014) pp: 53–76 online.
  107. Justin Vaïsse, Neoconservatism: The biography of a movement (Harvard UP, 2010) pp. 6–11.
  108. Jeffrey Record (2010). Wanting War: Why the Bush Administration Invaded Iraq. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 47–50. ISBN 9781597975902.
  109. Homolar-Riechmann, Alexandra (2009). "The moral purpose of US power: neoconservatism in the age of Obama". Contemporary Politics. 15 (2): 179–96. doi:10.1080/13569770902858111. S2CID 154947602.
  110. See "July 3, 2014 – Iraq – Getting In Was Wrong; Getting Out Was Right, U.S. Voters Tell Quinnipiac University National Poll" Quinnipiac University Poll Archived 2016-04-02 at the Wayback Machine item #51
  111. "Cruz: 'America Does Not Need Torture to Protect Ourselves'". December 3, 2015. Retrieved December 27, 2015.
  112. Theophilos Argitis; Andrew Mayeda (June 12, 2014). "Canada Tries Turning Up Heat on Obama as Keystone Stalled". Bloomberg News. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  113. Lipton, Eric (4 April 2015). "G.O.P.'s Israel Support Deepens as Political Contributions Shift". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 June 2015.
  114. "Republican Platform: American Exceptionalism". Republican National Committee. Retrieved 22 June 2015.
  115. Republican Platform adopted at GOP National Convention Aug 12, 2000
  116. 2008 Republican Party Platform, September 1, 2008
  117. David A. Fahrenthold (November 10, 2015). "GOP candidates split sharply on foreign intervention and ISIS". Washington Post.
  118. Blanton, Dana (2006-11-08). "National Exit Poll: Midterms Come Down to Iraq, Bush". Fox News. Archived from the original on March 6, 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-06.
  119. Peter Wallsten (17 Nov 2012). "New super PAC hopes to give cover to pro-immigration Republicans". The Washington Post.
  120. Frumin, Aliyah (November 25, 2013). "Obama: 'Long past time' for immigration reform". MSNBC. Retrieved January 26, 2014.
  121. Why Republicans didn’t write a platform for their convention this year
  122. Trump Campaign Announces President Trump’s 2nd Term Agenda: Fighting for You!
  123. GOP announces no new 2020 platform, party to 'enthusiastically support' Trump agenda
  124. How the GOP Became a Cult of Personality
  125. ‘Cult of Personality’: RNC Mocked After Announcing They’re Totally Abandoning a Party Platform, Just Supporting Trump
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.