Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), was a U.S. Supreme Court Case in which Silverthorne attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The issue in this case is whether or not derivatives of illegal evidence are permissible in court. The ruling, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., was that to permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible.[1] This precedent later became known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine,"[2] and is an extension of the exclusionary rule.

Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States
Argued December 12, 1919
Decided January 26, 1920
Full case nameSilverthorne Lumber Co., Inc., et al. v. United States
Citations251 U.S. 385 (more)
40 S. Ct. 182; 64 L. Ed. 319; 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1685
Holding
To permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinions
MajorityHolmes, joined by McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Clark
DissentWhite
DissentPitney

Chief Justice White and Associate Justice Pitney dissented without a written opinion.

See also

Further reading

  • Killian, B. J. (1982). "United States v. Crews: Fruit of the Poisonous TreeA New Wrinkle?". Idaho Law Review. 18: 151. ISSN 0019-1205.

References

  1. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920).
  2. Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939).


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.