Spiked (magazine)

Spiked is edited by Brendan O'Neill,[14] who self identifies as a Libertarian Marxist,[15][16] following Mick Hume's departure in January 2007.

The magazine also produces a number of podcasts, with contributors including Christopher Snowdon.

The magazine was founded in 2000 after the bankruptcy of its predecessor, the Revolutionary Communist Party's Living Marxism (LM).[17][1][18]

LM closed after losing a libel case brought against it by the broadcasting corporation ITN.[19][2] The case centered around ITN coverage of Fikret Alić and other Bosnian Muslims standing behind a barbed-wire fence at the Trnopolje camp during the Bosnian war. LM claimed to oppose Western intervention on traditional anti-imperialist grounds, and published an article titled "The Picture that Fooled the World"[20] which claimed that ITN's coverage was deceptive, the barbed-wire did not enclose the camp and the Muslims were in fact "refugees, many of whom went there seeking safety and could leave again if they wished." During the court case, evidence given by the camp doctor led LM to abandon its defence. ITN was awarded damages and costs, estimated to be around £1 million.[17][21][22]

Articles in the magazine have opposed censorship,[23] and its writers have called for a repeal of libel,[24] hate speech,[25] and incitement laws.[26][27] Spiked regularly critiques risk society, political correctness, and environmentalism.[12] As regards the latter, a particular Spiked target has been what they see as "exaggerated" and "hysterical" interpretations of the scientific consensus on global warming, and what they argue are double standards advocated by more advanced Western nations for self-serving reasons.[28]

Environmentalists such as George Monbiot[29][12] and Peter Melchett have suggested that the group of writers associated with LM, several of whom went on to form the core editorial group at Spiked, continue to constitute a 'LM Network' pursuing an ideologically motivated 'anti-environmentalist' agenda under the guise of promoting humanism.[30][31] In a 2007 interview in Spiked, Frank Furedi referred to these critics as "a network of McCarthyites".[32] Monbiot described the views of Living Marxism as having, "less in common with the left than with the fanatical right."[33] In 2018, Monbiot wrote that, "Its [Spiked's] articles repeatedly defend figures on the hard right or far right: Katie Hopkins, Nigel Farage, Alex Jones, the Democratic Football Lads' Alliance, Tommy Robinson, Toby Young, Arron Banks, Viktor Orbán".[4]

Activists associated with Spiked, sometimes described as part of 'the Spiked network', were active in campaigning for the UK to leave the European Union, with a number of its activists being involved in Nigel Farage's Brexit Party as candidates or publicists.[34][35][36][37][12][13] Those who joined the Brexit Party largely disagreed with Farage on domestic policies, and sought to build a left-wing faction inside the party.[35]

In 2018 Monbiot wrote that "Spiked's writers rage against exposures of dark money. It calls The Observer's Carole Cadwalladr, who has won a string of prizes for exposing the opaque spending surrounding the Brexit vote, 'the closest thing the mainstream British media has to an out-and-out conspiracy theorist'".[12]

Spiked opposed the post-9/11 invasions of Afghanistan and of Iraq and Western interference in developing nations in general.[38][39][40] It seeks to counter what it sees as a recent trend in Western foreign policy: humanitarian intervention.[41]

Frank Furedi, interviewed in Spiked in 2007, said that the stance of LM and Spiked originates from the "anti-Stalinist left".[32]

In July 2020, an exposé by the Daily Beast revealed that Spiked was one of several mainly conservative websites that had inadvertently published articles attributed to non-existent experts on the Middle-East. This network of fake journalists promoted the United Arab Emirates and pushed for harsher treatment of that country's opponents. Spiked did not remove the two articles, instead leaving an editorial note mentioning the articles' questionable authorship.[42][6][8]

The Daily Beast, as well as Paul Mason of the New Statesman, have described the site as libertarian.[42][6][43] A study in Policy & Internet by Heft et al. described Spiked as populist, saying that it has "roots in the radical left‐wing scene, but now oppose the political establishment from a position on the right side of the spectrum."[44] According to Tim Knowles, the technology correspondent for The Times, Spiked is right-wing and libertarian.[8] Jean Burgess, and James Bowman of the Ethics and Public Policy Center have referred to the site as left-libertarian.[45][46]

Projects

In May 2007 Spiked launched the Spiked Review of Books as is a monthly online literary criticism feature. This coincided with controversy in the United States following the scaling back of newspaper book review sections.[47]

Spiked produces annual "free speech rankings" of UK universities.[48][49]

A joint investigation between DeSmog UK and The Guardian revealed that Spiked US Inc. has received funding from the Charles Koch Foundation.[3][4][50] The writer George Monbiot suggested that this was due to the online magazine's attacks on left-wing politics, its support of hard right or far right figures, and the many articles it publishes by writers supported by the Institute of Economic Affairs and the Koch funded Cato Institute.[4][5]

• Official website