The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie
The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (French: Le Charme discret de la bourgeoisie) is a 1972 surrealist film directed by Luis Buñuel[1] and written by Jean-Claude Carrière in collaboration with the director.[2] The film was made in France and is mainly in French, with some dialogue in Spanish.
The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie | |
---|---|
Theatrical release poster | |
Directed by | Luis Buñuel |
Produced by | Serge Silberman |
Written by |
|
Starring | |
Cinematography | Edmond Richard |
Edited by | Hélène Plemiannikov |
Distributed by | 20th Century Fox |
Release date |
|
Running time | 101 minutes |
Country |
|
Language | French |
Budget | $800,000 |
The film consists of several thematically linked scenes: five gatherings of a group of bourgeois friends, and the four dreams of different characters. The beginning of the film focuses on the gatherings, while the latter part focuses on the dreams, but both types of scenes are intertwined. There are also scenes involving other characters, such as two involving a Latin American female terrorist from the Republic of Miranda. The film's world is not logical: the bizarre events are accepted by the characters, even if they are impossible or contradictory.
Buñuel plays tricks on his characters, luring them toward fine dinners that they expect, and then repeatedly frustrating them in inventive ways. They bristle, and politely express their outrage, but they never stop trying; they relentlessly expect and pursue all that they desire, as though it were their natural right to have others serve and pamper them. He exposes their sense of entitlement, their hypocrisy, and their corruption. In the dream sequences, he explores their intense fears—not just of public humiliation, but of being caught by police and of being mowed down by guns. At least one character's dream sequence is later revealed to be nested, or embedded, in another character's dream sequence. As the dreams-within-dreams unfold, it appears that Buñuel is also playing tricks on his audience, as we try to make sense of the story.
The narrative concerns a group of bourgeois people attempting—despite continual interruptions—to dine together. The film received the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film and a nomination for Best Original Screenplay.[3]
Plot
A bourgeois couple, the Thévenots (Frankeur and Seyrig), accompany M. Thévenot's colleague Rafael Acosta (Rey), who is the ambassador from the fictional South American nation of Miranda, and Mme. Thévenot's sister Florence (Ogier), to the house of the Sénéchals, the hosts of a dinner party. Once they arrive, Alice Sénéchal (Audran) is surprised to see them and explains that she expected them the following evening and has no dinner prepared. The would-be guests then invite Mme Sénéchal to join them for dinner at a nearby inn.
Arriving at the inn, the party finds it locked. They knock and are reluctantly invited in by a waitress who mentions that the restaurant is under new management. Inside, there are no diners, and the prices on the menu are disconcertingly low. The party hears wailing from an adjoining room and discovers a vigil for the corpse of the manager, who died a few hours earlier. The party is told that the coroner is coming soon, but they hurriedly depart.
Later, at the Embassy of Miranda, Acosta meets with MM. Thévenot and Sénéchal to discuss the proceeds of a large cocaine deal. During the meeting, Acosta sees a young woman selling clockwork-animal toys on the footpath outside the embassy. He shoots one of the toys with a rifle and the woman runs off. He explains that she is part of a terrorist group.
Two days later, the bourgeois friends attempt to have lunch at the Sénéchals', but Henri and his wife escape to the garden to have sex instead of joining them. One of the friends takes this to mean that the Sénéchals know the police are coming and left to avoid arrest for their involvement in drug trafficking. The party again leaves in a panic.
When the Sénéchals return from the garden, their friends are gone, but they meet a bishop who has donned their gardener's clothing. They throw him out, but when he returns wearing his bishop's robes, they embrace him with deference. The bishop asks to work for them as their gardener. He tells them about his childhood — that his parents were murdered by arsenic poisoning and that the culprit was never apprehended. (Later in the film, he goes to visit a dying man who turns out to be his parents' murderer; after blessing the man, the bishop kills him with a shotgun.)
The women visit a teahouse just as it has run out of all beverages – tea, coffee, and milk – although it finally turns out they do have water. While they are waiting, a soldier tells them about his childhood: how after his mother's death his cold-hearted father sent him to military school. The ghost of the soldier's mother informed him that the man was not his real father, but his father's killer; they had dueled over his mother. Following the ghost's request, the soldier killed the culprit with poison.
Mme. Thévenot meets Acosta at his apartment. They are having an affair but are interrupted by a visit from her husband, whereupon she makes a convenient excuse and leaves with him. Acosta is next visited by the young Maoist terrorist who has come to kill him. He ambushes and chastises her, then tells her to leave when she refuses his advances; his agents capture her and take her away.
Several abortive dinner parties ensue; interruptions include the arrival of a group of army officers and enlisted men who join the dinner only to be called away for alarmingly close military maneuvers, the revelation that a colonel's dining room is a stage set in a theatrical performance for an audience that is angry with the actors for not knowing their lines, the ambassador's shooting of the colonel after he insults the nation of Miranda and slaps the ambassador, the arrest and release of the bourgeois friends, and their summary execution by a hit squad. Most if not all of these scenes turn out to be dream sequences in which ghosts make frequent appearances.
A recurring scene throughout the film, of the six people walking silently and purposefully on a long, isolated country road, is also the final sequence.
Cast
|
|
Production
Pre-production
After having announced that Tristana (1970) would be his last film,[4] because he felt he was repeating himself, Luis Buñuel met with screenwriter Jean-Claude Carrière and discussed the topic of repetition. Shortly afterwards, Buñuel met with film producer Serge Silberman, who told him an anecdote about having forgotten about a dinner party and being surprised to find six hungry friends show up at his front door. Buñuel was suddenly inspired, and Silberman agreed to give him a $2,000 advance to write a new script with Carrière, combining Silberman's anecdote with the idea of repetition. Buñuel and Carrière wrote the first draft in three weeks and finished the fifth draft by the Summer of 1971, originally titled Bourgeois Enchantment. Silberman was finally able to raise the money for the film in April 1972, and Buñuel began pre-production.[5][6]
Buñuel cast many actors whom he had worked with in the past, such as Fernando Rey and Michel Piccoli, and catered their roles to their personalities. He had more difficulty casting the female leads and allowed actresses Delphine Seyrig and Stéphane Audran to choose which parts they would like to play, before changing the script to better suit the actresses. Jean-Pierre Cassel auditioned for his role and was surprised when Buñuel cast him after simply glancing at him once.[7]
Filming and editing
Filming began on May 15, 1972, and lasted for two months with an $800,000 budget. In his usual shooting style, Buñuel shot few takes and often edited the film in camera and during production. Buñuel and Silberman had a longrunning and humorous argument as to whether Buñuel took one day or one and a half days to edit his films.[8]
On the advice of Silberman, Buñuel used video playback monitors on the set for the first time in his career, resulting in a vastly different style than any of his previous films, including zooms and travelling shots instead of his usual close-ups and static camera framing.[6] It also resulted in Buñuel's being more comfortable on set, and in limiting his already minimal direction to technical and physical instructions. This frustrated Cassel, who had never worked with Buñuel before, until Rey explained that this was Buñuel's usual style and that since they were playing aristocrats their movements and physical appearance were more important than their inner motivation.
Buñuel once joked that whenever he needed an extra scene he simply filmed one of his own dreams. The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie includes three of Buñuel's recurring dreams: a dream of being on stage and forgetting his lines, a dream of meeting his dead cousin in the street and following him into a house full of cobwebs, and a dream of waking up to see his dead parents staring at him.[8]
Reception
The film was a box office hit in both Europe and the US, and critically praised.[8] Roger Ebert called it a comedy but noted that Buñuel’s comedies were “more like a dig in the ribs, sly and painful.”[9] Robert Benayoun said that it was "perhaps [Buñuel's] most direct and most 'public' film".[10] Vincent Canby wrote in his 1972 review of the film, “In addition to being extraordinarily funny and perfectly acted, The Discreet Charm moves with the breathtaking speed and self-assurance that only a man of Buñuel’s experience can achieve without resorting to awkward ellipsis.”[11] Buñuel later said that he was disappointed with the analysis that most film critics made of the film.[10] He also disliked the film's promotional poster, depicting a pair of lips with legs and a derby hat.[8]
Buñuel and Silberman travelled to the US in late 1972 to promote the film. Buñuel did not attend his own press screening in Los Angeles and told a reporter at Newsweek that his favorite characters in the film were the cockroaches. While visiting LA, Buñuel, Carrière and Silberman were invited to a lunch party by Buñuel's old friend George Cukor, and other guests included Alfred Hitchcock, Billy Wilder, George Stevens, Rouben Mamoulian, John Ford, William Wyler, Robert Mulligan and Robert Wise[12] (resulting in a famous photograph of the directors together, other than an ailing Ford). Fritz Lang was unable to attend, but Buñuel visited him the following day and received an autographed photo from Lang, one of his favorite directors.[13]
Awards and nominations
Year | Award ceremony | Category | Nominee | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
1974 | BAFTA Awards | Best Film | The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie | Nominated |
Best Direction | Luis Buñuel | Nominated | ||
Best Actress | Stéphane Audran | Won | ||
Best Original Screenplay | Luis Buñuel, Jean-Claude Carrière | Won | ||
Anthony Asquith Award for Film Music | Guy Villette, Luis Buñuel | Nominated | ||
Italian National Syndicate of Film Journalists | Best Foreign Director | Luis Buñuel | Nominated | |
1973 | Academy Awards | Best Foreign Language Film | France | Won |
Best Original Screenplay | Luis Buñuel, Jean-Claude Carrière | Nominated | ||
Golden Globe Awards | Best Foreign Language Film | The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie | Nominated | |
French Syndicate of Cinema Critics | Prix Méliès | The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie | Won | |
New York Film Critics Circle Awards | Best Director | Luis Buñuel | Nominated | |
Best Screenplay | Luis Buñuel, Jean-Claude Carrière | Nominated | ||
1972 | National Board of Review Awards | Top Foreign Language Films | The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie | Won |
New York Film Critics Circle Awards | Best Film | The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie | Won | |
Best Director | Luis Buñuel | Won | ||
Best Screenplay | Luis Buñuel, Jean-Claude Carrière | Nominated | ||
Awards trivia
Sensing that he had a special film, Silberman decided not to wait until May to premiere it at the Cannes Film Festival and instead released it in the fall of 1972 specifically to make it eligible for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. Buñuel was famously indifferent to awards and jokingly told a reporter that he had already paid $25,000 in order to win the Oscar. The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie did win the Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film and Silberman accepted on Buñuel's behalf at the ceremony. At the Academy's request, Buñuel posed for a photograph while holding the Oscar, but while wearing a wig and oversized sunglasses.[12]
Adaptations
In October 2014, Stephen Sondheim revealed that he and playwright David Ives were working on a new musical with a plot inspired by both The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie and Luis Buñuel's film The Exterminating Angel (1962).[14]
See also
References
- Staff (2004). The Scarecrow Movie Guide. Seattle: Sasquatch Books. p. 32. ISBN 1-57061-415-6.
- "Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie". IMDb. Retrieved 19 June 2011.
- "The 45th Academy Awards (1973) Nominees and Winners". oscars.org. Retrieved 2011-11-30.
- Wakeman, John. World Film Directors, Volume 1. The H. W. Wilson Company. 1987, p. 88.
- Baxter, John. Buñuel. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers, Inc.. 1994. ISBN 0-7867-0506-X. p. 299.
- Wakeman, pp. 88-89.
- Baxter, p. 300.
- Baxter, p. 301.
- https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-the-discreet-charm-of-the-bourgeoisie-1972
- Wakeman, p. 89.
- Canby, Vincent. “The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie.” The New York Times Guide to the Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made. Ed. Peter M. Nichols. [New York]: Times Books (Random House), 1999.
- Baxter, p. 302.
- Baxter, pp. 302-03.
- Voss, Brandon (2014-10-14). "Stephen Sondheim Is Working on a New Musical". The Advocate.
Further reading
- Kinder, Marsha (1999). Luis Buñuel's The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-56831-5.
External links
- The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie at IMDb
- The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie at AllMovie
- The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie at Rotten Tomatoes
- Roger Ebert's review of The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie
- Le Charme Discret de la Bourgeoisie - Film (Movie) Plot and Review - Publications