Tropical Depression Usman

Map plotting the track and the intensity of the storm, according to the Saffir–Simpson scale

On December 23, the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) began monitoring a tropical disturbance that had developed about 657 km (409 mi) to the east of Palau.[1] Around that time, the system was located in an area of moderate vertical wind shear and warm 28–30 °C (82.4–86 °F) sea-surface temperatures.[1] The disturbance slowly intensified and the JTWC issued a tropical cyclone formation alert at about 09:00 UTC on December 24.[2] At that time, the convection, or thunderstorm activity, around the system's low-level circulation center was rather sheared. Dvorak estimates were around T1.5 at the time, signalling that the system had 1-minute sustained winds of 45 km/h (30 mph).[3] This prompted the JTWC to upgrade the disturbance to a tropical depression, with the system receiving the designation 35W.[4] By 21:00 UTC of the same day, visible satellite imagery showed shallow rain banding (which is a cloud structure that is associated with an area of rain and thunderstorms) wrapping into a tight, but exposed center, with poorly organised convection.[5] The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) declared the system to be a weak tropical depression at around 06:00 UTC of December 25.[6] Around the same time, the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) had reported that the depression had entered their area of responsibility and assigned the local name Usman.[7]

The JMA began issuing advisories on 12:00 UTC of December 25, when they considered that the tropical depression had 10-minute sustained winds of 55 km/h (35 mph).[8] With Usman's ragged center, the system remained disorganised, as wind shear was becoming displaced to the northwest.[9] By 03:00 UTC on December 26, satellite imagery depicted that the system had multiple, minor circulation centers revolving around its original center. The storm's structure became somewhat disorganised due to the lack of convection, being blown off by the southeasterly wind shear.[10] The system maintained its intensity until the next day, when satellite imagery showed a broad circulation with excellent outflow along with extensive deep convection flaring near its center. At this point, both the JMA and the JTWC predicted that the system would intensify into a tropical storm within the next 24 hours.[11][12] Thereafter, convection had increased around the system, and the system's center became much more organised.[13] At 00:00 UTC on December 28, the JTWC reported that the system's 1-minute sustained winds to 55 km/h (35 mph).[14] A cold cold cover began obscuring the system's elongated center, thereafter.[15] On December 29, the system's central cold cover began to dissipate, and the JTWC had stated that the system began weakening and deteriorating.[16] Tropical Depression Usman made landfall in Borongan, Eastern Samar on 06:00 UTC of the same day, as the PAGASA downgraded the system to a low-pressure area.[17] The JMA stated that the system was located in an area of increasing wind shear.[18] Several hours later, both the JMA and the JTWC issued their final advisory on the system.[19][20]

On December 27, as Tropical Depression Usman inches closer to the eastern portion of the Philippines, the PAGASA raised a Tropical Cyclone Warning Signal #1 over much of the Bicol region and the Eastern Visayas region, with some even extending as north as Quezon province and as west as Cebu.[21] Local officials advised residents at that time to take precautionary measures in areas of low-lying and mountainous areas, especially those living near river channels.[22] The PAGASA also warned on sea travel, either to fishermen or those with small sea crafts, are risky in the seaboards of Southern Luzon, Central Luzon and the Surigao provinces due to rough seas combined with the northeast monsoon.[21][23] Heavy rains that could trigger landslides and flashfloods were expected in the areas under the alert signals.[21] Roughly 1,000 passengers later became stranded in Bacolod after sea travel was suspended.[24] The region of Western Visayas, which includes the island of Palawan, was raised a TCWS #1 on December 28,[25] as 851 passengers were stranded in that region alone.[26] As of 5 p.m. local time, the NDRRMC raised the "blue alert" status in much of the Western Visayas region, meaning that 50 percent of the RDRRMC personnel are on standby for emergencies and it is the second highest alert level.[26] At this point, the number of passengers stranded from the cause of suspended sea travel rose to 13,000,[25] where 6,000 of them were from the Bicol Region.[27] In the city of Tacloban, their mayor ordered to suspend work in government offices and their local officials have set up 71 evacuation centres ready for displaced families.[28]

Following the landfall and the deterioration of the tropical depression, widespread flooding and landslides were reported in many areas. Six towns in Masbate saw 61 families, or 259 individuals forced to evacuate their homes due to extreme flooding.[29] Local officials in the area also lifted the temporary ban for sea travel on the morning of December 29 to allow the remaining stranded passengers to travel.[29] This was the same in the Bicol Region were 3,900 people were evacuated. In Northern Samar, the heavy rained caused flooding to as high as 2–7 ft (24-84 inches).[30] In Bicol, 473.1 mm (18.6 in) of rain was recorded for the two days of December 28 and 29.[31] Strong winds and heavy rain from Usman caused the shutdown of some power plants, which led to power outages in some areas In Albay, Catanduanes and Eastern Visayas.[30] On December 30, a state of calamity was raised in the provinces of Camarines Sur, Camarines Norte and Sorsogon, along with the municipality of Polangui in Albay.[32][33] Eight other municipalities in Oriental Mindoro were also raised a state of calamity by local officials on the next day.[32]

Throughout the country, a total of 238,127 families were affected by Usman. About 36,574 houses were either partially or totally damaged.[34] A total of 156 people have died from the storm, with 105 people being injured. 26 people have remained missing. An estimated cost of damages were toppled to ₱5.41 billion (US$103 million), where ₱1.95 billion (US$37.1 million) were to be part of agricultural damages and ₱3.46 billion (US$65.9 million) were to be part of infrastructure damages.[34]

On January 2019, Mahar Lagmay, a Disaster scientist, claimed that the high death toll by the system was caused by the PAGASA issuing incorrect and misleading forecasts for Tropical Depression Usman.[35][36] The PAGASA then responded to the scientist's statement regarding this claim, and stated that Lagmay had used the "hour rainfall intensity" classification instead of the "24-hour accumulated rainfall" classification, where it has been used commonly in their tropical cyclone bulletins.[35] Local officials also criticised the PAGASA due to the fact how their residents became confused and complacent when Usman was downgraded to a low-pressure area, which also meant the PAGASA lifting any storm signals.[35] The PAGASA later addressed and confirmed this, however they explained that the storm signals are distinct from the amount of rainfall accumulated, as the signals described more of the expected winds in the area.[35] They also added that they did release a weather advisory on the low-pressure area (that was once Usman) on December 29 regarding that "moderate to heavy rains will continue over Bicol Region in the next 24 hours."[35]

Because the system caused damages of over ₱1 billion, the PAGASA retired the name Usman, despite it being used for the first time in their naming lists. In March 2019, the PAGASA revised their lists and replaced the name with Umberto for the 2022 season.[37]

• Tropical Storm Washi
• Tropical Depression Winnie
• Tropical Depression Auring (2009)

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tropical Depression Usman (2018).

• 35W.THIRTYFIVE from the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory