Vitrella brassicaformis

Extant cultures of V. brassicaformis were isolated by Robert Moore from the coral Leptastrea purpurea in the Great Barrier Reef. These are available from the NCMA culture collection in Maine USA (cultures 3156, 3157, 3158) and are also backed up in other collections, such as NQAIF (Australia), and CCAP (UK). In 2004, the strains deposited to CCMP (now NCMA) by R. Moore were manually "re-isolated" (repurified) by CCMP staff. Staff worked under the assumption that the flagellate (motile) stage could be separated permanently from the benthic spherical stages, which is not so, as these are stages of a single lifecycle. The fact that this unusual peer-review process could have happened in the history of the description of the species is an example of the very unusual lifecycle/morphology combination of this organism compared to other photosynthetic eukaryotes that many culture collections were accustomed to handling. However, it is not an unusual lifecycle for dinoflagellates, which are photosynthetic relatives of V. brassicaformis.

Besides its varied somatic lifecycle, V. brassicaformis' putative gametogenesis and recombining stages have been well documented.[1]

The term "mixotrophy" defines this lifestyle which combines phototrophy (light as energy source) and heterotrophy (predation as energy source).[2] Mixotrophic dinoflagellates are very common in the food web,[3] and "Vitrella"-like organisms may have been the ancestors of such, raising the possibility that further families of Chromerida may eventually be found in the environment.[4]

Vitrella brassicaformis was described in 2011 by Obornik et al.,[1] from type material RM11 (CCMP3155)[5] originally isolated from host Pocillopora damicornis.[2] Major differences between V. brassicaformis and C. velia were noted by the authors, leading to their classification into two distinct families, Vitrellaceae and Chromeraceae, respectively.

Just as for its sister family Chromeraceae, the family Vitrellaceae is a bridge between alternate views of protist evolution: the botanical view versus the zoological view. These views need not be opposed. Apicomplexans (all non-photosynthetic) are generally described using the zoological code, while protistan (often unicellular) algae have often been described using the botanical code. Protistologists have always been free to use whichever code they choose, and these two organisms (V. brassicaformis and C. velia) are prime examples of the need for this freedom. They possess a flagellate stage and a benthic stage.

Researcher Thomas Cavalier-Smith investigating the origins of apicomplexans and dinozoans, suggested a joint category Myzozoa encompassing both of these superphyla, plus related groups the colpodellids and perkinsids.[6] By morphology and lifestyle,V. brassicaformis more closely resembles an ancestral Myzozoan than C. velia does. V. brassicaformis has a circular plastid genome[7] as an ancestral Myzozoan would have had, and is also capable of hunting (myzocytosis) as they were.[2] These two lifestyles, autotrophy and heterotrophy, found in one organism (V. brassicaformis) represent the store of potential that was able to lead to the Myzozoan radiation.

Vitrella brassicaformis was isolated from the Scleractinian coral Leptastrea purpurea (tropical) using a variation of a method intended to isolate Symbiodiniaceae (algal symbionts of corals). Vitrellaceae occur globally in tropical and warm subtropical marine environments. They are associated not only with coral reef ecosystems, but also.[4]