Balkline
Balkline is the overarching title of a group of carom billiards games generally played with two cue balls and a third, red object ball on a cloth-covered, 5 foot × 10 foot, pocketless billiard table. The object of the game is to score points, also called counts, by striking a player's cue ball so it makes contact with both object balls (the second cue ball and the third ball) on a single stroke. A win is achieved by reaching an agreed upon number of counts.[1][2] The table is divided by lines drawn on the surface, called balklines, into marked regions called balk spaces. Such balk spaces define areas of the table surface in which a player may only score up to a threshold number of counts while the object balls are within that region.[1][3]
The balkline games were developed to make the precursor game, straight rail, more difficult to play and less tedious for spectators to view in light of skill developments which allowed top players to score a seemingly endless series of points with the balls barely moving in a confined area of the table playing area.[1][4] Straight rail, unlike the balkline games, had no balk space restrictions, although one was later added. According to Mike Shamos, curator of the U.S. Billiard Archive, "the skill of dedicated players [of straight rail] was so great that they could essentially score at will." The development of balkline is characterized by a series of back and forth developments, where new rules would be implemented to make the game more difficult and to decrease high runs to keep spectators interested, countered by skill development to account for each new rule.[1][5]
History
Straight rail, from which balkline derives, is thought to date to the 18th century, although no exact time of origin is known. In straight rail, there was originally no restriction on the manner of scoring.[1]
A technique soon developed, known as "crotching", referring to the space near the corner of a table where the rails meet. By moving the two object balls into the crotch, a player could endlessly score off of them, all the while keeping them immobilized in that corner.[1] Crotching was quickly banned in 1862, and players are required to move the ball out of the corner after three points.[6]
Skill in the professional game increased mostly through the refinement of gather shots and the development of a variety of "nurse" techniques.[1][7] A gather shot is one in which brings the cue ball and object balls together, ideally near a rail. A nurse shot involves careful manipulation of object balls once gathered, which results in both balls being touched by the cue ball, but with all three balls barely moving, or that result in a position that can be duplicated over and over.[1] The most important of these is the rail nurse which involves the progressive nudging of the object balls down a rail, keeping them close together and positioned at the end of each stroke in the same or near the same configuration such that the nurse can be replicated again and again.[1][8] At the U.S. straight rail professional tournament held in 1879, Jacob Schaefer Sr. scored 690 points in a single inning at the table. With the balls barely moving and repetitively hit, there was little for the fans to watch.[9]
Shortly after, with the specific intent of frustrating nurse shots along the rail,[1] officials employed diagonal lines at the table's corners to regions where counts were restricted, an expansion of the crotching rule that came to be known as the "champion's game".[10][11]
Reporting on the first tournament at which the rules were featured in 1879, The New York Times wrote: "taken as a test, the games thus far played indicate that the new game has taken well with the public, for whose amusement it was chiefly designed. That the rules binding it have effected a great improvement on the ordinary game of French caroms there can be no doubt."[12][13] Ultimately, despite its divergence from straight rail, the champion's game simply expanded the dimensions of the balk space defined under the existing crotch prohibition which was not sufficient to stop nursing.[1]
As a response, rather than drawing balklines diagonally in just the corners, the entire table was divided into rectangular balk spaces, by drawing balklines a certain distance lengthwise and widthwise across the length of the table a set distance parallel out from each rail.[1] The use of such balklines was first proposed in 1875 but was rejected. However, because high runs once again increased as skill compensated for the new conditions, in 1883 the balklines were accepted, replacing the champion's game in tournament play. A variety of distances and count restrictions have been used.[14]
Balklines did not end the use of the rail nurse but they did restrict its use. Soon a new type of nurse was developed which exploited a loophole in balkline rules: so long as both object balls were on either side of a balkline, there was no restriction on counts, as each ball lay in a separate balk space, a technique called the anchor nurse.[1]
On 1894, Chicago billiard hall owner J. E. Parker, after Schaefer and Frank C. Ives both posted extensive runs at his hall using the anchor nurse, suggested adding a rectangular marking straddling the spot where the balkline meets each rail, known as the anchor space and nicknamed the "Parker's box". Enclosing a space 3.5 inches (8.9 cm) out from the rail and 7 inches (18 cm) across, the box marks a region where both balls are considered in balk, even if the object balls physically fall on either side of a balkline. When first instituted, ten shots were allowed while the balls were inside the anchor space. This was reduced to five in 1896.[1]
True to form, the next skill development response was the chuck nurse, known as a rocking cannon in the United Kingdom. With one ball frozen to the cushion in the anchor space, but the second object ball away from the rail just outside the borders of the anchor space, the cue ball is gently rebounded off the frozen ball not moving it, but with just enough speed to meet the other object ball which rocks in place, but does not change position. In 1912, William A. Spinks ran 1,010 continuous points using the chuck nurse and broke off his run without ever missing.[1]
There were a number of proposals to curtail the chuck nurse's effectiveness, including removing the four balk spaces on the end rails but leaving balk spaces in place on the long rails,[15] but the solution ultimately reached, and the change that brought the general rules of balkline into configuration with what is played today, was simply a doubling of the anchor space to 7 by 14 inches (18 cm × 36 cm), placing the chuck nurse out of reach. The new restriction was instituted for a 1914 tournament.[1]
In its various incarnations, balkline was the predominant billiards discipline from 1883 to the 1930s when it was overtaken by three cushion billiards and pool. Balkline is not very common in the U.S. but still enjoys a large popularity in Europe and the Far East.[1][16]
Modern forms
For the most part, the differences between one balkline game to another is defined by two measures: the distance of the balklines from the cushions, and the number of points that are allowed in each balk space before at least one ball must leave the region. Generally, balkline games are given numerical names indicating both of these characteristics; the first number indicates the distance in either inches or centimeters (depending on the units used) and the second, after a dot, indicates the count restriction in balk spaces, which is usually either one or two. For example, in 18.2 balkline, one of the more prominent balkline games of U.S. origin, the name indicates that balklines are drawn 18 inches (46 cm) from each rail, and only two counts are allowed in a balk space before a ball must leave.[1] By contrast, in 71.2 balkline, of French origin, lines are drawn 71 centimetres (28 in) from each rail, also with a two count restriction for balk spaces.[17]
References
- Shamos, Michael Ian (1993). The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Billiards. New York City: Lyons & Burford. pp. 8, 15, 41, 46, 50–1, 86–7, 104, 108, 157–8, 167, 232–4. ISBN 1-55821-219-1.
- Grolier Inc., ed. (1998). The Encyclopedia Americana. Danbury, Ct: Grolier Incorporated. p. 746. ISBN 0-7172-0131-7.
- Cohen, Neil, ed. (1994). The Everything You Want to Know About Sport Encyclopedia. Toronto: Bantam Books. p. 79. ISBN 0-553-48166-5.
- Stein, Victor; Paul Rubino (1994). The Billiard Encyclopedia: An Illustrated History of the Sport (2nd ed.). New York: Blue Book Publications. pp. 301–2. ISBN 1-886768-06-4.
- Hoyle, Edmond (1907). Hoyle's Games (Autograph ed.). New York: A. L. Burt Company. p. 40.
- BCA Rules Committee (1998). Billiards — The Billiard Congress of America Official Rules and Records Book (50th anniversary commemorative ed.). Coralville, Iowa: Billiard Congress of America. pp. 85–6. ISBN 1-87849-308-6.
- Hoppe, Willie (1975). Thomas Emmett Crozier (ed.). Thirty Years of Billiards. New York City: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-23126-7.
- Jim Loy (1998). The Rail Nurse Archived January 7, 2007, at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved December 30, 2006.
- Shamos, Michael Ian (1991). Pool. Hotho & Co., June, 1991. ISBN 99938-704-3-9.
- "Billiards under New Rules.; a Tournament in Which Rail Play Will Be Restricted-the Programme". The New York Times. November 10, 1879. Retrieved December 27, 2006 – via nytimes.com.
- "Billiards Under New Rules". The New York Times. November 10, 1879. p. 8. Retrieved June 16, 2019 – via newspapers.com.
- New York Times Company (November 17, 1879). Miscellaneous City News; First Week of the New Game. Record of the Players in the Collender "Champion's Game" Tournament. The New York Times. Retrieved December 27, 2006.
- "Meeting of the Champions; The Big Billiard Tournament to Begin To-morrow — What Ives, Schaefer, and Slosson Have Been Doing in Practice — The Older Players Not Afraid of the Big Runs Made by Ives — Something About the Rise and Progress of the Young 'Napoleon' of the Billiard World", no byline, The New York Times, December 10, 1893, p. 10; The New York Times Company, New York, NY, USA. Uses the term "champion's game".
- New York Times Company (October 28, 1888). Drawbacks to Billiards; Personal Solicitude the Source of Nearly All. Lost Professional Pride and Pluck Both Evades Public Matches and Suppresses Them. The New York Times. Retrieved December 27, 2006.
- "Change Is Planned in Balkline Game; Miller Proposal Would Eliminate Four of Nine Zones in Effort to Stop Long Runs". The New York Times. August 10, 1924. Retrieved December 27, 2006.
- New York Times Company (October 24, 1919). Hoppe Hoppe Adds Morningstar's Scalp to His Collection Made in Billiard Title Tourney; Hoppe Maintains Row of Victories Billiard Champion Takes Measure of Morningstar in 18.2 True Play at Astor. Cochran Makes Long Run Sets High Mark for Tourney of 165 in Beating Yamada--Sutton's Play Falls Off-Badly. Hoppe Gets Long Lead. Gathers Big Cluster. High Run of 165. Mostly Cushion Shots. Sutton Not in Form. Schaefer Has Little Trouble. The New York Times. Retrieved January 2, 2007.
- Kieran, John (December 7, 1937). "Sports of the Times". The New York Times. p. 35. Retrieved May 4, 2010.
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Balkline billiards. |