Controversies about Opus Dei

Opus Dei is a personal prelature within the Roman Church that has been the subject of numerous controversies.

Throughout its history, Opus Dei has been criticized by many, including by numerary members who knew the founder and had roles in Opus Dei's internal government.[1][2][3][4][5][6] The reports by former members in the USA, England, Spain, Latin America, France, Germany, and other countries are published. Journalists have described it as "the most controversial force in the Catholic Church" and its founder Josemaría Escrivá as a "polarizing" figure.[7][8][9]

The canonization process of Escrivá has been described as unreliable. Former members who worked and lived with him for years reported that they "did not recognize" the highly flattering portrait of Escrivá promoted by Opus Dei at the time of the canonization process as the same man they had known. Numerous members also reported being excluded from the process because prelate Javier Echevarría feared that they would reveal unflattering facts about Escrivá. Another former member has reported that John Paul II allowed an unusually swift canonization of Escrivá because Opus Dei had bailed out the Vatican Bank with $250 million in 1985. Those who question the infallibility of the canonization of Escrivá note that John Paul II was naïve in the cases of Theodore McCarrick and Marcial Maciel,[10] both of whom procured large sums of money for the Vatican,[11][12][13][14][15][16] like Opus Dei.

Controversies about Opus Dei have centered on allegations of secretiveness,[17] including the cover-up of sexual abuse in Spain, Mexico, Uruguay, Chile, and the United States; [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] recruiting methods aimed at teenagers becoming numeraries; the illicit use of psychiatric drugs in its central headquarters; the misleading of its lay faithful about their status and rights under Canon Law; the "mortification of the flesh" practiced by its celibate members (cilice, discipline, and sleeping on a board);[29] elitism and misogyny; and support of authoritarian or right-wing governments, including the fascist Franco regime.[30]

According to former members of Opus Dei, the controversies about Opus Dei are rooted in practices institutionalized while Escrivá was alive and are written into internal documents and orally-transmitted customs that have not been reviewed by the institutional Church. These include:

  • mandatory weekly or bi-weekly manifestation of one's conscience (the "chat" or "fraternal confidence") to an assigned member of the local government ("local council"), in conflict with the Code of Canon Law Canons 220, 239, 240, and 630;[31][32]
  • systematic deception of the lay "members" about their actual canonical status[33][34][35][36][37]
  • directors' explicit promotion of strategies approaching children as young as thirteen to become numeraries;
  • reporting of personal material obtained from the manifestation of conscience ("chat") to higher-level directors;[38][39][40][41][42]
  • unethical prescription of sertraline, topiramate, and lorazepam by numerary doctors (at the behest of directors) to other numeraries who are neither depressed nor epileptic. The purpose of this has allegedly been to stifle critical thinking in those who question or challenge Opus Dei practices.[43][44]

Some of the more famous former numeraries who have reported on these matters are: Maria del Carmen Tapia, Secretary to Escrivá in Rome and commissioned by Escrivá to start the women's branch of Opus Dei in Venezuela; Vladimir Felzmann, a numerary priest;[4] Miguel Fisac, who accompanied Escrivá across the Pyrenees during the Spanish Civil War and lived for years with him in Rome; Antonio Perez Tenessa, Secretary General of Opus Dei and regional director of Opus Dei in Spain; and María Angustias Moreno.

Opus Dei has also been criticized for allegedly seeking independence and more influence within the Catholic Church.[45]

According to some journalists, criticisms against Opus Dei are based on jealousy or fabrications by opponents.[7][46][8][47][48] Critics respond that some of these journalists are associated with Opus Dei, [49][50] and that none of them interviewed numeraries who left Opus Dei in protest or examined internal governing documents.

Defenders of Opus Dei point out that John Paul II and other Catholic leaders have endorsed Opus Dei's teaching on the sanctifying value of work, and its fidelity to Catholic beliefs.[51][52] Critics reply that Escrivá's teachings about work and the responsibilities of the laity are not actually unique in the history of ascetical theology.[53][54] Furthermore, members who lived with Escrivá in Rome report that the original charism of sanctification of work was largely abandoned in the 1960's when Opus Dei took on the characteristics of an institutionalized religious order proselytizing teenagers.[55]

Historical opposition from Jesuits

Josemaría Escrivá admired Ignatius of Loyola,[56][57][58][59][60][61] and had a Jesuit priest as a spiritual director (Fr. Sánchez) at the time that he founded Opus Dei (1928ff.).[62] As a result, he apparently based some of the practices of Opus Dei on the Constitutions of the Society of Jesus,[63] such as: required manifestation of conscience to a superior, seeking prestigious people for membership, a military-style hierarchical authority structure,[64] and an emphasis on blind obedience as a means of efficiency in the apostolate.[65]

Nevertheless, the Superior-General of the Society of Jesus Fr. Wlodimir Ledochowski (1866–1942) later told the Vatican he considered Opus Dei "very dangerous for the Church in Spain." He described it as having a "secretive character" and saw "signs in it of a covert inclination to dominate the world with a form of Christian Masonry."[66] In the 1950's, some Jesuits told Italian parents of members of Opus Dei that their sons were being led to damnation.

Allegations like this from within well-regarded ecclesiastical circles ("the opposition by good people," as Escrivá called it), were interpreted by Escrivá as misunderstandings or jealousies, and defenders of Opus Dei today claim that present-day criticisms are merely vestiges of this old prejudice.[7] Specifically, they argue that criticism of Opus Dei by members of the Society of Jesus was caused by these Jesuits' not understanding the difference between Opus Dei and religious orders, and that this misunderstanding continues among people with a "clerical" or "religious" mentality. For Opus Dei officially describes itself[67] in contrast to "religious" (monastic) life: ordinary lay Christians living out their baptismal call to holiness without being externally distinguished from other citizens.

Messori, a journalist associated with Opus Dei, also identifies political ideology as the root of some controversies involving some Jesuits. After Vatican II certain sectors of the Church became politically and theologically "liberal," including Jesuits in Latin America who were experimenting with "liberation theology." In contrast, some Opus Dei laymen had been working for the far-right Franco regime in Spain and similar regimes in Latin America. Escrivá himself gave a spiritual retreat to Franco, and the numerary priest and bishop Juan Luis Cipriani Thorne was reportedly friendly with Peru's president Fujimori and unsupportive of human rights advocates.[68][69][70] Messori emphasizes, however, that Opus Dei has also had members from left-wing parties such as the UK Labour Party (see Opus Dei and politics).[71]

Corporal mortification
Main article: Mortification of the flesh
Closeup of a cilice—a small metal chain with inwardly pointing spikes

Much public attention has focused on Opus Dei's encouragement of the practice of bodily mortification, especially after descriptions of the practice appeared in the popular novel The Da Vinci Code.[72]

Opus Dei's celibate members (numeraries, numerary assistants, and associates) practice three forms of corporal mortification that were traditionally used in religious orders and also by some laypeople in Catholic countries such as Spain.[73] One of the more controversial forms of mortification is the use of a cilice, a small metal chain with inwardly pointing spikes that is worn around the upper thigh. The cilice's spikes cause pain and may leave small marks, but typically do not cause bleeding.[74] Numeraries, associates, and numerary assistants are expected wear a cilice for two hours each day except feast days. Another mortification is to whip themselves with a small "discipline" (a corded rope whip) for a few minutes once a week while saying a prayer, as a participation in Jesus' scourging. (Escrivá had special whips for himself with metal tips on the end; these caused bleeding.[75]) Additionally, female numeraries only are required to sleep on a board instead of a mattress; former female members have explained that Escrivá justified this rule by saying that since numerary women had to give up having children, they needed this mortification to keep them emotionally strong. Male numeraries are expected to sleep on the floor one night a week instead. Supernumeraries and associates, who do not live in Opus Dei centers (and hence share a bed or bedroom with family), are instead expected or encouraged to sleep without a pillow one night per week.

Mortification ("dying to oneself") has had a long history within the Catholic Church, e.g. fasting on certain days with prayers, etc. Corporal mortification of the type practiced by Opus Dei celibates, however, is a rare practice for modern Catholics. Opus Dei points out mortification was practiced by many highly revered individuals such as Mother Teresa, Óscar Romero and Padre Pio.[76] Escrivá accused the secularised world of inconsistency in accepting physical pain and sacrifice in other domains (such as athletics, business, and personal beautification), but objecting to such acts when done for a religious purpose.

Allegations of aggressive recruiting

Opponents allege Opus Dei uses cult-like practices in recruitment. For instance, Jesuit priest and writer James Martin wrote that Opus Dei puts great emphasis on recruiting, and pointed to Escriva's writings which say "You must kill yourselves for proselytism."[77] David Clark, a consultant who specialises in helping people leave cults, claimed in 2006 that Opus Dei used a cult-like recruitment technique called "love bombing", in which potential members are showered with flattery and admiration by members of the organization in order to entice them into joining.[78] Former member Dimitri Knobbe wrote of such an experience he had with the group in 1993.[79] The mother of a member at Harvard University claimed the group separated her daughter from her family, and in 1991 founded Opus Dei Awareness Network, a group that aims to provide information and critique on the group's practices.[80]

Allegations of being highly controlling

Critics accuse the organization of maintaining an extremely high degree of control over its members. Ex-members claim that Opus Dei directors[81] read letters of the members. According to a 2006 Wayback Machine report by BBC Mundo Jose Carlos Martin de la Hoz, priest of the prelature in Spain, said this practice existed in the past, but clarified it was a manifestation of opening and confidence of the faithfuls of the Opus Dei.[82] In 2001, an Opus Dei spokesman said the practice of reading the mail of numeraries was abandoned years ago,[83] since written letters are now rarely used for correspondence. As an additional means of guidance, it was deemed fitting for numeraries to first show to or tell the Directors about the contents of the letter, especially when the letter would need to touch on vocation.

About 20% of Opus Dei are celibate. They live in special residential centers where they lead extremely structured lives— critics say this practice isolates its members from the rest of society and allows Opus Dei to have nearly total control over its members' environments. Critics note that numeraries in Opus Dei generally submit all their incoming and outgoing mail to their superiors to read.[84] They also point to a "Forbidden Books List" that details which books members are not allowed to read without the express permission of their superiors.[84] For some books, a numerary's direct supervisor can provide permission, but for other books, permission can only be given by the prelate in Rome. According to some critics, Opus Dei pressures numeraries to cut off social contact with non-members, including their own families.[78] Numeraries in Opus Dei generally hand over their entire salaries to the organization, and critics say this makes numeraries extremely dependent upon the organization.

Opus Dei denies exerting any undue control over its members, and supporters say Opus Dei places an extraordinary emphasis on the personal freedom of its members. They quote Escrivá who said "Respect for its members' freedom is an essential condition for Opus Dei's very existence."

Supporters defend Opus Dei's list of inappropriate books by pointing out the Vatican itself maintained a similar list until the 1960s. To explain the celibate lifestyle of numeraries and their relationships with their families, supporters quote Jesus's comment that "He who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me."[85]

Allegations of secrecy

Critics have often accused Opus Dei of intense secrecy. Due to its secrecy critics such as the Jesuit Wladimir Ledóchowski sometimes refer to Opus Dei as a "Catholic", "christian", or "white" form of Freemasonry.[86][87][88][89][90] Opus Dei does not publish memberships lists, and members generally do not publicly reveal they are part of the organization. .[91] According to its 1950 constitution, members are forbidden to reveal their membership without the express permission of their superiors.[92] This practice has led to rampant speculation about who may or may not be a member of Opus Dei. The 1950 constitution similarly prohibited even revealing how many people were members of Opus Dei.[93][94] Opus Dei claims as an open and apartitical organization, having a hierarchy with four degrees of membership.[95]

Additionally, critics claim Opus Dei is secretive about its activities. Opponents cite the fact Opus Dei often will not directly reveal its relationship to many of its institutions.[91] According to critics, Opus Dei does not allow many of its own rules to be made public. For example, the 1950 Constitution states, "These Constitutions, published instructions, and those which in the future may be published, and the other things pertaining to the government of the Institute are never to be made public. Indeed, without the permission of the Father [Escrivá] those documents which are written in the Latin language may not be translated into [other] languages." Similarly, Opus Dei does not reveal details about its finances.[96]

Allen says, "Opus Dei cannot be called secretive." Accusations of secrecy, he says, stem from mistakenly equating its members with monks and expecting members to behave as clerics. Instead, its lay members, like normal professionals, are ultimately responsible for their personal actions, and do not externally represent the prelature which provides them spiritual training. Opus Dei itself, he says, provides abundant information.[97] Supporters claim Opus Dei's relative silence stems not from a secretive nature, but rather is the result of a deep commitment to privacy, humility, and "avoidance of self-aggrandizement."[97] Supporters argue Opus Dei "has the obligation to respect its members' privacy"[98] They say members of Opus Dei do generally reveal their membership status to their family and closest friends. The historical opposition to Opus Dei may also have contributed to the need for privacy— as one author speculates, "I think part of it, too, is that, historically, because a lot of people didn't like Opus Dei, there was just a sense that it would be better not to be too upfront because you're just inviting hostility."[99]

Recently, Opus Dei has twice been engaged in legal disputes in connection with their trademark (CTM Registration No. 844.860 OPUS DEI (word)),[100] as they claimed infringement firstly in 2002 regarding the magazine "Opus Gay" and lost,[101] and secondly regarding the currently ongoing case of the philosophy-themed atheist card game "Opus-Dei: Existence After Religion".

Women
Main article: Women in Opus Dei

The role of women in Opus Dei is another source of criticism. Women are treated as equal in Opus Dei but are separated from men in their personal spiritual training. In many male Opus Dei centres, women visit every evening to cook for the men and then leave without social interaction, as Escrivá recognised that despite the equality of men and women, centres for men may need a female influence to function.

Alleged independence and influence within the Roman Catholic Church

Critics have argued that Opus Dei's unique status as a personal prelature within the Church gives it too much independence. According to critics, elevating Opus Dei to the status of a personal prelature allows its members to "go about their business almost untouched by criticism or oversight by bishops".[102] According to critics, Opus Dei has such autonomy it has become essentially a "church within a church".[103]

Catholic officials say church authorities have even greater control of Opus Dei now its head is a prelate appointed by the Pope, and they argue members are "even more conscious of belonging to the Church".[104] They point to canon law which states that Opus Dei members remain under "jurisdiction of the diocesan bishop in what the law lays down for all the ordinary [Catholics]". Similarly, they point out that Opus Dei must obtain permission from the local bishop before establishing an Opus Dei center within the diocese.

Some critics claim Opus Dei exerts a disproportionately large influence within the Church itself. They point to the unusually hasty (and otherwise irregular) process in which Escriva was canonized.[105] Pope John Paul II was a supporter of Opus Dei, and during his pontificate the head of the Vatican press office was a member of Opus Dei. An Opus Dei spokesman says "the influence of Opus Dei in the [Vatican] has been exaggerated."[106] Of the nearly 200 cardinals in the Roman Catholic Church, only two are known to be members of Opus Dei.[107][108] Similarly, of the nearly 4000 bishops, only 20 are known to be members of Opus Dei.[108][109]

John L. Allen Jr. said that Escriva's relatively quick canonization does not have anything to do with power but with improvements in procedures and John Paul II's decision to make Escriva's sanctity and message known.[7] (see Opus Dei and politics)

Objections to critics

Supporters of Opus Dei say criticisms of it are often motivated by bad faith, jealousy, vengefulness, or other biases on the part of the critics.[110] In some cases, supporters accuse critics of merely misunderstanding Opus Dei, its mission, or its novelty.

Secularism

Opus Dei's supporters often see criticism as motivated by a religious bias or political agenda. Many supporters say criticisms of Opus Dei stem from a generalized disapproval of spirituality, Christianity, or Catholicism.[111] Some supporters see criticisms of Opus Dei as one facet of a larger prejudice against Catholics.[112]

Jesuits and liberal Catholics

Many supporters of Opus Dei believe the Jesuits hold a grudge against Opus Dei borne of jealousy and ideological differences. Richard John Neuhaus said: "The opposition to Opus Dei cannot be explained without at least some reference to jealousy. Competition and jealousy among religious movements in the Catholic Church is nothing new, and some Opus Dei members are not hesitant to suggest that theirs is now the role in the Church once played by the Jesuits. The Jesuits, who were once viewed as the elite corps of the papacy, have in recent decades had a sharply attenuated relationship to the hierarchical leadership of the Church. The famous "fourth vow" of allegiance to the pope is now frequently understood by Jesuits as a vow to the papacy in general---meaning the papacy as they think it ought to be."

"Nothing attracts criticism like success," says author Robert Royal, "In the seventy years since its founding, the Work has grown to almost eighty thousand members, over half in Europe, another third in the Americas, and the rest scattered throughout the world. As Vittorio Messori notes, this movement, which was once thought of as a pre-Vatican II fossil by progressives, has not only survived the heyday of progressive Catholic movements, but continues growing while the left in general, religious and lay, is shrinking."

According to Time magazine, "church liberals, once riding high, have understood for decades that Rome does not incline their way. They feel abandoned, says John L. Allen Jr., 'and whenever you feel that way, there's a natural desire to find someone to blame.'"

The animosity from within the Church derives from the conflicting views of the role of the Church following Vatican II. At the time, the superior of the Jesuits, Pedro Arrupe, "symbolised the new post-Vatican II ethos, calling his Jesuits to be 'men for others', which in practice sometimes meant joining movements for peace and justice," while "Escrivá walked another path, insisting on the primacy of traditional forms of prayer, devotion, and the sacramental life." Making Opus Dei a "personal prelature" and Escrivá a saint "seemed like a clampdown on the Jesuits---almost as if a torch was being passed." As Allen points out, some of Opus Dei's harshest critics were once Jesuit priests."[113]

According to Vittorio Messori, a major source of hostility towards Opus Dei is the application of political categories to a religious phenomenon such as Opus Dei. These groups against Opus Dei, he says, see everything happening in the world only through the prism of power-seeking, that is, of political spectrums of people in the left versus people on the right. Since Opus Dei is one of the major religious groups, the application of politically motivated campaigns against it is even stronger.

According to Allen, Opus Dei became the lightning rod for the attacks of liberals in the culture wars when John Paul II, perceived as a conservative by the liberals, granted several favorable things to Opus Dei such as beatification, canonization of the founder, and personal prelature status.

Controversy as a sign of contradiction
Christ crucified. Jesus Christ who was spoken against, attacked and killed is a sign of contradiction. According to Cardinal Heenan, Opus Dei is a sign of contradiction. On the other hand, liberal Catholics and theologians, like Hans Küng or Juan José Tamayo deny this argument, and says that Opus Dei has a cult-like style

Some supporters of Opus Dei have viewed the controversy surrounding the organization as a "Sign of contradiction." Proponents of this view hold that blessed, divinely inspired Christian organizations will always be criticized, just as Jesus was criticized by his contemporaries. Accordingly, they see the very existence of critics as further proof of the organization's sanctity.[114][115] A theological explanation is given by John Carmel Heenan, Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster. He commented in 1975: "One of the proofs of God's favour is to be a sign of contradiction. Almost all founders of societies in the Church have suffered. Monsignor Escrivá de Balaguer is no exception. Opus Dei has been attacked and its motives misunderstood. In this country and elsewhere an inquiry has always vindicated Opus Dei."[116]

According to Catholic tradition, a sign of contradiction points to the presence of Christ or the presence of the divine due to the union of that person or reality with God. In his book, Sign of Contradiction, John Paul II says that "sign of contradiction" might be "a distinctive definition of Christ and of his Church."

John Paul II stated, in his decree on the heroic virtues of Opus Dei's founder, Josemaría Escrivá: "God allowed him to suffer public attacks. He responded invariably with pardon, to the point of considering his detractors as benefactors. But this Cross was such a source of blessings from heaven that the Servant of God's apostolate [or evangelizing work] spread with astonishing speed."

See also

References
  1. News, A. B. C. "Controversy Over Opus Dei". ABC News.
  2. Kamm, Henry (Jan 8, 1984). "THE SECRET WORLD OF OPUS DEI (Published 1984)" – via NYTimes.com.
  3. "Opus Dei in the United States". America Magazine. Feb 25, 1995.
  4. Maryniak, Irena (1993). "Binding the mind that serves". Index on Censorship. 22: 24–25. doi:10.1080/03064229308535487. S2CID 144352377.
  5. "BBC - Religions - Christianity: Opus Dei". www.bbc.co.uk.
  6. "The real scandal for Opus Dei and the church". National Catholic Reporter. Sep 27, 2011.
  7. John Allen (2005). Opus Dei: An Objective Look Behind the Myths and Reality of the Most Controversial Force in the Catholic Church. Doubleday Religion. ISBN 0-385-51449-2.
  8. Noam Friedlander (8 October 2005). "What Is Opus Dei? Tales of God, Blood, Money and Faith". The Times. London. Retrieved 10 February 2008.
  9. Brennan Hill. "Who Stood For and Against Hitler?". American Catholic. Retrieved 27 November 2006.
  10. Sexual abuse scandal of Marcial Maciel
  11. "Marcial Maciel: Mexican founder Legionaries of Christ 'abused 60 minors'". Dec 22, 2019 – via www.bbc.com.
  12. "Mexican Catholic group says late leader Marcial Maciel abused at least 60 minors". the Guardian. Dec 22, 2019.
  13. "Legionaries of Christ Denounce Founder, Marcial Maciel Degollado (Published 2014)". Feb 6, 2014 – via NYTimes.com.
  14. "Vatican faults others for McCarrick's rise, spares Francis". AP NEWS. Nov 10, 2020.
  15. http://www.vatican.va/resources/resources_rapporto-card-mccarrick_20201110_en.pdf
  16. CNN, Delia Gallagher, Hada Messia, Richard Allen Greene, and Rob Picheta. "Vatican admits Pope John Paul II was warned about abusive archbishop Theodore McCarrick, while clearing Francis". CNN.
  17. David Van Biema (19 April 2006). "The Ways of Opus Dei". Time. Retrieved 24 March 2007.
  18. Núñez, Julio (Sep 28, 2020). "El Supremo rebaja la pena de 11 a dos años de cárcel al profesor pederasta del colegio Gaztelueta". EL PAÍS.
  19. Andueza, Iker Rioja (Oct 31, 2020). "Habla la víctima de abusos sexuales en el colegio Gaztelueta del Opus Dei: "No me sorprendería que hubiese más casos. No hay que tener miedo a contarlo"". ElDiario.es.
  20. "Dos exalumnos denuncian los abusos sexuales de un profesor de religión de Montgat". Noticiero Universal. Feb 7, 2019.
  21. https://www.diaridegirona.cat/girona/2019/01/31/cinc-exalumnes-del-bell-lloc/959833.html
  22. Sevilla, Diario de (Jul 6, 2020). "Condenado un cura del Opus Dei por unos abusos sexuales ocurridos en Sevilla". Diario de Sevilla.
  23. "Opus Dei sancionó a un destacado numerario que admitió abuso sexual más de 30 años después". subrayado.com.uy.
  24. "Infancia Robada, al Opus: "Una respuesta inapropiada, extemporánea e insuficiente"". Religión Digital. Jul 16, 2020.
  25. ""Le dio un beso en la boca": buscan a director de colegio en Guanajuato". El Informador :: Noticias de Jalisco, México, Deportes & Entretenimiento.
  26. S.A.P, El Mercurio (Feb 1, 2019). "Opus Dei informa que recibió dos denuncias por abusos en contra del sacerdote Patricio Astorquiza | Emol.com". Emol.
  27. "Denuncian a director de colegio del Opus Dei por abuso de alumno en León". Noticieros Televisa. Nov 24, 2020.
  28. Boorstein, Michelle. "Opus Dei paid $977,000 to settle sexual misconduct claim against prominent Catholic priest" – via www.washingtonpost.com.
  29. "Inside Opus Dei | Access Online". Access.
  30. "ICSA - Founded 1979 - Opus Dei Over Time". www.icsahome.com.
  31. "Opuslibros - La libertad de las conciencias en el Opus Dei.- Oráculo". www.opuslibros.org.
  32. "Opuslibros - El plan iniciático de formación del Opus Dei.- Oráculo". www.opuslibros.org.
  33. http://opuslibros.org/libros/raztinger/CONGREGATIO_PLENARIA.pdf
  34. "Opuslibros - Preguntas a los canonistas.- El Cid Campeador". www.opuslibros.org.
  35. "Opuslibros - Comentarios al reciente escrito del Cid Campeador.- Gervasio". www.opuslibros.org.
  36. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/_P10.HTM
  37. "Opuslibros - Opus Dei: Delirio de identidad.- Gervasio". www.opuslibros.org.
  38. "Opuslibros - INFORMES DE CONCIENCIA.- OpusLeaks". www.opuslibros.org.
  39. "Opuslibros - INFORMES DE CONCIENCIA (2).- OpusLeaks". www.opuslibros.org.
  40. "Opuslibros - INFORMES DE CONCIENCIA (3).- OpusLeaks". www.opuslibros.org.
  41. "Opuslibros - INFORMES DE CONCIENCIA (4).- OpusLeaks". www.opuslibros.org.
  42. "Opuslibros - INFORMES DE CONCIENCIA (5).- OpusLeaks". www.opuslibros.org.
  43. "Opuslibros - Buscar". www.opuslibros.org.
  44. "Opuslibros - Mi vida: otra historia que tampoco valió la pena (8).- No_valio_la_pena". www.opuslibros.org.
  45. Michael Walsh (2004). Opus Dei: An Investigation into the Powerful Secretive Society within the Catholic Church. Harper San Francisco. ISBN 0-06-075068-5.
  46. Maggy Whitehouse (2006). Opus Dei: The Truth Behind the Myth. Hermes House. ISBN 0-681-35584-0.
  47. Messori, Vittorio (1997). Opus Dei, Leadership and Vision in Today's Catholic Church. Regnery Publishing. ISBN 0-89526-450-1.
  48. Patrice de Plunkett. "Entretien avec l'auteur de L'Opus Dei – Enquête sur le " monstre "". Zenit News Agency. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 20 June 2007.
  49. "OPUS DEI | Kirkus Reviews" – via www.kirkusreviews.com.
  50. "Four Courts Press founder who was 'a model of publishing integrity'". The Irish Times.
  51. "Papal statements on Opus Dei". Opus Dei Official Site. Retrieved 27 November 2006.
  52. "Quotes on Opus Dei from U.S. Bishops". Retrieved 11 December 2016.
  53. "Rerum Omnium Perturbationem (January 26, 1923) | PIUS XI". www.vatican.va.
  54. "Opuslibros - Decadencia de la santificación del trabajo ordinario.- Gervasio". www.opuslibros.org.
  55. "Opuslibros - El Opus Dei, Instituto Secular (I): Pío XI, 'precursor' de Escrivá.- Idiota". www.opuslibros.org.
  56. "Opus Dei - writings of the founder". www.escrivaworks.org.
  57. "Opus Dei - writings of the founder". www.escrivaworks.org.
  58. "Opus Dei - writings of the founder". www.escrivaworks.org.
  59. "Opus Dei - writings of the founder". www.escrivaworks.org.
  60. "Opus Dei - writings of the founder". www.escrivaworks.org.
  61. "Opus Dei - writings of the founder". www.escrivaworks.org.
  62. E.g. A. Vazquez de Prada, The Founder of Opus Dei: Volume I (Scepter Publishing, 1997), pp. 286-7, 403-4, 431.
  63. https://jesuitas.lat/uploads/the-constitutions-of-the-society-of-jesus-and-their-complementary-norms/Constitutions%20and%20Norms%20SJ%20ingls.pdf
  64. "Harsh, Unyielding Militancy Of Opus Dei Leadership - from the Catholic Herald Archive". archive-uat.catholicherald.co.uk.
  65. "To the Members of the Society in Portugal | Georgetown University Library". www.library.georgetown.edu.
  66. Andres Vasquez de Prada: The Founder of Opus Dei. The Life of Josemaria Escrivá. Vol II: God and Daring., Scepter Publishers 1997, p. 387.
  67. opsdei.org
  68. "Peruvian cardinal shows influence by getting Fujimori to meet with Kuczynski". www.efe.com.
  69. "Everything you need to know about human rights in Peru". www.amnesty.org.
  70. "Peru". www.theadvocatesforhumanrights.org.
  71. Pierce, Andrew (24 September 2008). "The rise and fall of Ruth Kelly the youngest ever woman Cabinet minister" – via www.telegraph.co.uk.
  72. "Accuracy of best-selling 'Da Vinci Code' comes under fire". opusdei.org.
  73. "The Mysteries of Opus Dei". US News and World Report. 2003-12-22. Retrieved 2006-11-28.
  74. "They Whip Themselves, Don't They?". The Da Vinci Code & Opus Dei. Archived from the original on 2006-10-11. Retrieved 2006-11-27.
  75. See the biography sanctioned by the prelature: Vazquez de Prada, The Founder of Opus Dei
  76. "Opus Dei and corporal mortification". Opus Dei Official Site. Retrieved 2006-11-27.
  77. Opus Dei In the United States James Martin, S.J., America Press, February 25, 1995
  78. Abbott Karloff (2006-05-14). "Opus Dei members: 'Da Vinci' distorted". Daily Record. Retrieved 2006-11-27. mirrored on ReligionNewsBlog.com
  79. Dimitri Knobbe. "The Opus Dei Survival Kit". Opus Dei Awareness Network. Retrieved 2006-11-27.
  80. Elizabeth W. Green (2003-04-10). "Opening the doors of Opus Dei". The Harvard Crimson.
  81. Stephen Tomkins: The Dei today, BBC News, January 24, 2005
  82. BBC Mundo: Radiografia del Opus Dei (span.)
  83. "Interview with Opus Dei Spokesman Brian Finnerty, 2001". ABCNEWS. Archived from the original on August 6, 2004.
  84. Paul Moses. "Fact, Fiction And Opus Dei". Newsday. Retrieved 2006-11-27.
  85. Christoph Schonborn, O.P. "Are there sects in the Catholic Church?". Eternal Word Television Network. Retrieved 2006-11-27., Matthew 10:37
  86. Maria del Carmen Tapia. "Beyond the Threshold". archive.nytimes.com. Retrieved 2018-03-30.
  87. Preston, Paul (1986). The triumph of democracy in Spain. London: Methuen. p. 28. ISBN 9780416900101. OCLC 14586560.
  88. Harding, Nick (2005). Secret societies. Edison, N.J.: Chartwell Books, Inc. p. 107. ISBN 9780785821700. OCLC 78244509.
  89. Hesse, Alexander (2015), Geheimbünde Freimaurer und Illuminaten, Opus Dei und Schwarze Hand (in German), Reinbek: Rowohlt Taschenbuch, p. 54, ISBN 9783499630491
  90. Augias, Corrado (2012), Die Geheimnisse des Vatikan : Eine andere Geschichte der Papststadt (in German) (1., neue Ausg ed.), München: Beck, C H, p. 415, ISBN 9783406630927
  91. David Van Biema The Ways of Opus Dei, TIME, April 16, 2006. Retrieved December 5, 2007. Archived 14 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  92. Van Biema, David (2006-04-16). "The Ways of Opus Dei". Time. Archived from the original on 12 Jan 2007. Retrieved 2010-04-30.
  93. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-06-13. Retrieved 2006-06-07.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  94. "ODAN". www.odan.org.
  95. N. Dehan. Translated by S. Rini. "Opus Dei: a strange pastoral phenomenon". Le Sel de la Terre. Archived from the original on September 9, 2013. Retrieved Aug 12, 2018. Just as Freemasonry solemnly claims to give no political orders, it is the men of the Opuswho influence, effect, and supply policy. And behind their impetus lies that spirit so much in line with the Opus’ doctrine.
  96. Opus Dei PBS Archived 15 April 2002 at the Wayback Machine
  97. Edward Pentin. "Profiles: John Allen". The American. Archived from the original on 2007-10-16. Retrieved 2006-11-27.
  98. Rafael Gómez Pérez (1992). Opus Dei. Una Explicación. (Spanish) 3rd ed., Ediciones Rialp, Madrid, ISBN 84-321-2892-9
  99. "MSN - Outlook, Office, Skype, Bing, Breaking News, and Latest Videos". www.msnbc.msn.com. Archived from the original on 2005-03-26.
  100. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-19. Retrieved 2010-05-14.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  101. "Chile settles row over gay paper". BBC News. 2004-12-31.
  102. "Essay: Opus Dei and The Da Vinci Code". Archived from the original on Aug 19, 2006.
  103. "Opus Dei in the open". The Bulletin. 2002-10-02. Archived from the original on 2012-07-12. Retrieved 2006-05-16.
  104. Francesco Monterisi. "The Personal Prelature: a Framework which Enriches the Communion of the Church". Opus Dei website. Retrieved 2007-02-17.
  105. Paul Baumann. "Let There Be Light: A look inside the hidden world of Opus Dei". Washington Monthly. Archived from the original on 2006-08-29. Retrieved 2006-11-27.
  106. "Decoding secret world of Opus Dei". BBC News. 2005-09-16. Retrieved 2010-04-30.
  107. Associated Press, "Opus Dei backs new pope", CNN, April 19, 2005
  108. "Prelates". www.gcatholic.org.
  109. Sinikka Tarvainen (Mar 8, 2006). "'Da Vinci Code' puts shadowy Opus Dei in the spotlight". monstersandcritics.com. Archived from the original on 2007-02-01. Retrieved 2006-12-12.
  110. Discussed by Cardinal Josef Höffner in an interview to the Catholic News Service KNA in Germany on 24 August 1984.
  111. Julian Herranz, quoted in Javier Espinoza. "Opus Dei is not a Sect". OhmyNews. Archived from the original on 2006-05-13. Retrieved 2006-11-27.
  112. "Christians have bad days, too. But let's track a c..." www.beliefnet.com.
  113. Telegraph (UK): You can trust them to sell you a car, October 23, 2005
  114. John Carmel Heenan
  115. Read, Piers Paul (2005-10-23). "You can trust them to sell you a car". The Telegraph. London. Retrieved 2006-11-27.
  116. Other examples are: Piers Paul Read , Messori 1997, Richard Gordon Archived 2006-11-11 at the Wayback Machine

Books and notes
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.