Indigenous territory (Brazil)

Part of a series on
Indigenous rights
Rights
Ancestral domain Intellectual property Land rights Language Traditional knowledge Treaty rights
Governmental organizations
AADNC ACHPR Arctic Council Bureau of Indian Affairs Council of Indigenous Peoples FUNAI INPI NCIP UNPFII
NGOs and political groups
AFN Amazon Conservation Team Amazon Watch CAP COICA CONAIE Cultural Survival EZLN fPcN IPACC IPCB IWGIA NARF ONIC Survival International UNPO more ...
Issues
Civilizing mission Manifest destiny Lands inhabited by indigenous peoples Discovery doctrine Indigenism
Legal representation
ILO 107 ILO 169 United Nations Declaration
Category

As of 2016, there were 702 indigenous territories in Brazil, covering 1,172,995 km² – 14% of the country's land area.[13] As of 2020, 120 areas were in the formal process of being identified, covering a total of 1,084,049 hectares; 43 had been formally identified (2,179,316 ha); 74 had been formally declared (7,305,639 ha) and 487 had already been formally approved (106,858,319 ha). This means that in total, 723 areas were either under evaluation or had been legally consolidated as indigenous territories, covering a total area of 117,427,323 hectares.[7] For historical reasons—Portuguese colonisation started from the coast—most of these are concentrated in the country's interior, particularly Amazônia.[8] There are only three federated units without any TIs: the states of Rio Grande do Norte and Piauí, and the Federal District.

Indigenous territories by state (2011)

Flag	State	Number of TIs [14][tn 1]	Area of TIs (km2) [15][tn 2]	Proportion of state area [tn 2]
	Acre	36	30,721	20.13%
	Alagoas	10	130	0.47%
	Amapá	6	41,965	29.38%
	Amazonas	166	527,783	33.6%
	Bahia	26	2,345	0.42%
	Ceará	11	114	0.08%
	Distrito Federal	0	0	0%
	Espírito Santo	3	76	0.16%
	Goiás	5	405	0.12%
	Maranhão	20	19,057	5.74%
	Mato Grosso	78	188,490	20.87%
	Mato Grosso do Sul	49	6,781	1.9%
	Minas Gerais	9	670	0.11%
	Pará	58	305,724	24.5%
	Paraíba	3	338	0.6%
	Paraná	26	944	0.47%
	Pernambuco	15	1,181	1.2%
	Piauí	0	0	0%
	Rio de Janeiro	5	24	0.05%
	Rio Grande do Norte	0	0	0%
	Rio Grande do Sul	45	1,088	0.39%
	Rondônia	24	62,526	26.32%
	Roraima	32	195,752	87.27%
	Santa Catarina	20	562	0.59%
	São Paulo	28	171	0.07%
	Sergipe	1	43	0.2%
	Tocantins	12	25,521	9.19%
	Brazil	672	1,105,258	13%

1. As of March 2011. Some TIs cross state borders and are counted twice.
2. Approximate. See above.

The process of demarcating indigenous territories was established in the 1973 Statute of the Indian and has been revised several times, most recently in 1996.[16][17] Under the current legal framework, the initial identification and definition of potential TIs is the responsibility of FUNAI, the government body in charge of indigenous affairs, who commission an ethnographic and geographical survey of the area and publish a proposal. This proposal must then be approved by the Ministry of Justice, who consider FUNAI's proposal and any objections from other interested parties with respect to the Constitution. If approved, FUNAI begins physically demarcating the new TI and the National Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform undertakes the resettlement of any non-indigenous occupants. Final approval, or homologation, for the demarcation a TI is issued by the President of the Republic, after which it is officially registered.[3]

The Statute of the Indian specified that all indigenous lands should be demarcated by 1978,[18] and the 1988 Constitution also set a five-year deadline.[2] However, demarcation is still ongoing. The process is frequently delayed by legal disputes arising from the objections of non-indigenous settlers and commercial interests in the proposed TI. This has been increasingly common since 1996, when a change in the law required an explicit period to be set aside in the demarcation process for the hearing of complaints.[4] In 2008 the Supreme Federal Court issued a high-profile decision in favour of the continued territorial integrity of Raposa Serra do Sol in Roraima. Non-indigenous rice farmers had protested their deportation from the TI, arguing that the reserve undermined Brazil's national integrity and the state's economic development, and proposing that it be broken up. The ruling established a legal precedent that affected more than 100 similar cases that were before the Supreme Court at the time.[6][10]

Land ownership is a contentious issue in Brazil. In the 1990s, as much as 45% of the available farmland in the country was controlled by 1% of the population.[19] Some advocates of land reform have therefore criticised the amount of land reserved for indigenous peoples, who make up just 0.2% of the national population. According to this view the 1988 Constitution's approach towards indigenous peoples' right to land is overly idealist, and a return to a more integrationist policy is favoured.[12] In the Raposa Serra do Sol dispute, non-indigenous rice farmers and their advocates charged TIs with hindering economic development in sparsely populated states such as Roraima, where a large proportion of the land is reserved for indigenous peoples despite commercial pressures to develop it for agricultural use.[11] Instituto Socioambiental, a Brazilian indigenous rights group, argue that the disparity between indigenous population and land ownership is justified because their traditional subsistence patterns (typically shifting cultivation or hunting and gathering) are more land extensive than modern agriculture, and because many TIs include large areas of agriculturally unproductive land or are environmentally degraded due to recent incursions.[8]

Opponents of indigenous territories also claim that they undermine national sovereignty. The promotion of indigenous rights by NGOs is seen as reflecting an "internationalisation of the Amazon" which is contrary to Brazil's economic interests.[10][11] Elements in the military have also expressed concern that because many TIs occupy border regions they pose a threat to national security – although both the army and police are allowed full access.[6]

The current system of indigenous territories has also been criticised by proponents of indigenous rights, who say that the process of demarcation is too slow[4] and that FUNAI lacks the resources to properly protect them from encroachment once registered.[20]

• Indigenous peoples in Brazil
• List of indigenous peoples in Brazil