Lorentz force

Trajectory of a particle with a positive or negative charge q under the influence of a magnetic field B, which is directed perpendicularly out of the screen.

Beam of electrons moving in a circle, due to the presence of a magnetic field. Purple light is emitted along the electron path in a Teltron tube due to the electrons colliding with gas molecules.

Charged particles experiencing the Lorentz force.

In many textbook treatments of classical electromagnetism, the Lorentz force law is used as the definition of the electric and magnetic fields E and B.[6][7][8] To be specific, the Lorentz force is understood to be the following empirical statement:

The electromagnetic force F on a test charge at a given point and time is a certain function of its charge q and velocity v, which can be parameterized by exactly two vectors E and B, in the functional form:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =q(\mathbf {E} +\mathbf {v} \times \mathbf {B} )}$

This is valid, even for particles approaching the speed of light (that is, magnitude of v = |v| ≈ c).[9] So the two vector fields E and B are thereby defined throughout space and time, and these are called the "electric field" and "magnetic field". The fields are defined everywhere in space and time with respect to what force a test charge would receive regardless of whether a charge is present to experience the force.

As a definition of E and B, the Lorentz force is only a definition in principle because a real particle (as opposed to the hypothetical "test charge" of infinitesimally-small mass and charge) would generate its own finite E and B fields, which would alter the electromagnetic force that it experiences. In addition, if the charge experiences acceleration, as if forced into a curved trajectory, it emits radiation that causes it to lose kinetic energy. See for example Bremsstrahlung and synchrotron light. These effects occur through both a direct effect (called the radiation reaction force) and indirectly (by affecting the motion of nearby charges and currents).

Lorentz' theory of electrons. Formulas for the Lorentz force (I, ponderomotive force) and the Maxwell equations for the divergence of the electrical field E (II) and the magnetic field B (III), La théorie electromagnétique de Maxwell et son application aux corps mouvants, 1892, p. 451. V is the velocity of light.

Early attempts to quantitatively describe the electromagnetic force were made in the mid-18th century. It was proposed that the force on magnetic poles, by Johann Tobias Mayer and others in 1760,[14] and electrically charged objects, by Henry Cavendish in 1762,[15] obeyed an inverse-square law. However, in both cases the experimental proof was neither complete nor conclusive. It was not until 1784 when Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, using a torsion balance, was able to definitively show through experiment that this was true.[16] Soon after the discovery in 1820 by Hans Christian Ørsted that a magnetic needle is acted on by a voltaic current, André-Marie Ampère that same year was able to devise through experimentation the formula for the angular dependence of the force between two current elements.[17][18] In all these descriptions, the force was always described in terms of the properties of the matter involved and the distances between two masses or charges rather than in terms of electric and magnetic fields.[19]

The modern concept of electric and magnetic fields first arose in the theories of Michael Faraday, particularly his idea of lines of force, later to be given full mathematical description by Lord Kelvin and James Clerk Maxwell.[20] From a modern perspective it is possible to identify in Maxwell's 1865 formulation of his field equations a form of the Lorentz force equation in relation to electric currents,[3] although in the time of Maxwell it was not evident how his equations related to the forces on moving charged objects. J. J. Thomson was the first to attempt to derive from Maxwell's field equations the electromagnetic forces on a moving charged object in terms of the object's properties and external fields. Interested in determining the electromagnetic behavior of the charged particles in cathode rays, Thomson published a paper in 1881 wherein he gave the force on the particles due to an external magnetic field as[5]

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} ={\frac {q}{2}}\mathbf {v} \times \mathbf {B} .}$

Thomson derived the correct basic form of the formula, but, because of some miscalculations and an incomplete description of the displacement current, included an incorrect scale-factor of a half in front of the formula. Oliver Heaviside invented the modern vector notation and applied it to Maxwell's field equations; he also (in 1885 and 1889) had fixed the mistakes of Thomson's derivation and arrived at the correct form of the magnetic force on a moving charged object.[5][21][22] Finally, in 1895,[4][23] Hendrik Lorentz derived the modern form of the formula for the electromagnetic force which includes the contributions to the total force from both the electric and the magnetic fields. Lorentz began by abandoning the Maxwellian descriptions of the ether and conduction. Instead, Lorentz made a distinction between matter and the luminiferous aether and sought to apply the Maxwell equations at a microscopic scale. Using Heaviside's version of the Maxwell equations for a stationary ether and applying Lagrangian mechanics (see below), Lorentz arrived at the correct and complete form of the force law that now bears his name.[24][25]

Charged particle drifts in a homogeneous magnetic field. (A) No disturbing force (B) With an electric field, E (C) With an independent force, F (e.g. gravity) (D) In an inhomogeneous magnetic field, grad H

In many cases of practical interest, the motion in a magnetic field of an electrically charged particle (such as an electron or ion in a plasma) can be treated as the superposition of a relatively fast circular motion around a point called the guiding center and a relatively slow drift of this point. The drift speeds may differ for various species depending on their charge states, masses, or temperatures, possibly resulting in electric currents or chemical separation.

While the modern Maxwell's equations describe how electrically charged particles and currents or moving charged particles give rise to electric and magnetic fields, the Lorentz force law completes that picture by describing the force acting on a moving point charge q in the presence of electromagnetic fields.[10][26] The Lorentz force law describes the effect of E and B upon a point charge, but such electromagnetic forces are not the entire picture. Charged particles are possibly coupled to other forces, notably gravity and nuclear forces. Thus, Maxwell's equations do not stand separate from other physical laws, but are coupled to them via the charge and current densities. The response of a point charge to the Lorentz law is one aspect; the generation of E and B by currents and charges is another.

In real materials the Lorentz force is inadequate to describe the collective behavior of charged particles, both in principle and as a matter of computation. The charged particles in a material medium not only respond to the E and B fields but also generate these fields. Complex transport equations must be solved to determine the time and spatial response of charges, for example, the Boltzmann equation or the Fokker–Planck equation or the Navier–Stokes equations. For example, see magnetohydrodynamics, fluid dynamics, electrohydrodynamics, superconductivity, stellar evolution. An entire physical apparatus for dealing with these matters has developed. See for example, Green–Kubo relations and Green's function (many-body theory).

Right-hand rule for a current-carrying wire in a magnetic field B

When a wire carrying an electric current is placed in a magnetic field, each of the moving charges, which comprise the current, experiences the Lorentz force, and together they can create a macroscopic force on the wire (sometimes called the Laplace force). By combining the Lorentz force law above with the definition of electric current, the following equation results, in the case of a straight, stationary wire:[27]

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =I{\boldsymbol {\ell }}\times \mathbf {B} }$

where ℓ is a vector whose magnitude is the length of wire, and whose direction is along the wire, aligned with the direction of conventional current charge flow I.

If the wire is not straight but curved, the force on it can be computed by applying this formula to each infinitesimal segment of wire dℓ, then adding up all these forces by integration. Formally, the net force on a stationary, rigid wire carrying a steady current I is

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =I\int \mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}\times \mathbf {B} }$

This is the net force. In addition, there will usually be torque, plus other effects if the wire is not perfectly rigid.

One application of this is Ampère's force law, which describes how two current-carrying wires can attract or repel each other, since each experiences a Lorentz force from the other's magnetic field. For more information, see the article: Ampère's force law.

The magnetic force (qv × B) component of the Lorentz force is responsible for motional electromotive force (or motional EMF), the phenomenon underlying many electrical generators. When a conductor is moved through a magnetic field, the magnetic field exerts opposite forces on electrons and nuclei in the wire, and this creates the EMF. The term "motional EMF" is applied to this phenomenon, since the EMF is due to the motion of the wire.

In other electrical generators, the magnets move, while the conductors do not. In this case, the EMF is due to the electric force (qE) term in the Lorentz Force equation. The electric field in question is created by the changing magnetic field, resulting in an induced EMF, as described by the Maxwell–Faraday equation (one of the four modern Maxwell's equations).[28]

Both of these EMFs, despite their apparently distinct origins, are described by the same equation, namely, the EMF is the rate of change of magnetic flux through the wire. (This is Faraday's law of induction, see below.) Einstein's special theory of relativity was partially motivated by the desire to better understand this link between the two effects.[28] In fact, the electric and magnetic fields are different facets of the same electromagnetic field, and in moving from one inertial frame to another, the solenoidal vector field portion of the E-field can change in whole or in part to a B-field or vice versa.[29]

Lorentz force -image on a wall in Leiden

Given a loop of wire in a magnetic field, Faraday's law of induction states the induced electromotive force (EMF) in the wire is:

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}=-{\frac {\mathrm {d} \Phi _{B}}{\mathrm {d} t}}}$

where

${\displaystyle \Phi _{B}=\iint _{\Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} \mathbf {A} \cdot \mathbf {B} (\mathbf {r} ,t)}$

is the magnetic flux through the loop, B is the magnetic field, Σ(t) is a surface bounded by the closed contour ∂Σ(t), at time t, dA is an infinitesimal vector area element of Σ(t) (magnitude is the area of an infinitesimal patch of surface, direction is orthogonal to that surface patch).

The sign of the EMF is determined by Lenz's law. Note that this is valid for not only a stationary wire – but also for a moving wire.

From Faraday's law of induction (that is valid for a moving wire, for instance in a motor) and the Maxwell Equations, the Lorentz Force can be deduced. The reverse is also true, the Lorentz force and the Maxwell Equations can be used to derive the Faraday Law.

Let Σ(t) be the moving wire, moving together without rotation and with constant velocity v and Σ(t) be the internal surface of the wire. The EMF around the closed path ∂Σ(t) is given by:[30]

${\displaystyle {\mathcal {E}}=\oint _{\partial \Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}\cdot \mathbf {F} /q}$

where

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} =\mathbf {F} /q}$

is the electric field and dℓ is an infinitesimal vector element of the contour ∂Σ(t).

NB: Both dℓ and dA have a sign ambiguity; to get the correct sign, the right-hand rule is used, as explained in the article Kelvin–Stokes theorem.

The above result can be compared with the version of Faraday's law of induction that appears in the modern Maxwell's equations, called here the Maxwell–Faraday equation:

${\displaystyle \nabla \times \mathbf {E} =-{\frac {\partial \mathbf {B} }{\partial t}}\ .}$

The Maxwell–Faraday equation also can be written in an integral form using the Kelvin–Stokes theorem.[31]

So we have, the Maxwell Faraday equation:

${\displaystyle \oint _{\partial \Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}\cdot \mathbf {E} (\mathbf {r} ,\ t)=-\ \iint _{\Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} \mathbf {A} \cdot {{\mathrm {d} \,\mathbf {B} (\mathbf {r} ,\ t)} \over \mathrm {d} t}}$

and the Faraday Law,

${\displaystyle \oint _{\partial \Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}\cdot \mathbf {F} /q(\mathbf {r} ,\ t)=-{\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} t}}\iint _{\Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} \mathbf {A} \cdot \mathbf {B} (\mathbf {r} ,\ t).}$

The two are equivalent if the wire is not moving. Using the Leibniz integral rule and that div B = 0, results in,

${\displaystyle \oint _{\partial \Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}\cdot \mathbf {F} /q(\mathbf {r} ,t)=-\iint _{\Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} \mathbf {A} \cdot {\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}\mathbf {B} (\mathbf {r} ,t)+\oint _{\partial \Sigma (t)}\!\!\!\!\mathbf {v} \times \mathbf {B} \,\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}}$

and using the Maxwell Faraday equation,

${\displaystyle \oint _{\partial \Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}\cdot \mathbf {F} /q(\mathbf {r} ,\ t)=\oint _{\partial \Sigma (t)}\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}\cdot \mathbf {E} (\mathbf {r} ,\ t)+\oint _{\partial \Sigma (t)}\!\!\!\!\mathbf {v} \times \mathbf {B} (\mathbf {r} ,\ t)\,\mathrm {d} {\boldsymbol {\ell }}}$

since this is valid for any wire position it implies that,

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =q\,\mathbf {E} (\mathbf {r} ,\ t)+q\,\mathbf {v} \times \mathbf {B} (\mathbf {r} ,\ t).}$

Faraday's law of induction holds whether the loop of wire is rigid and stationary, or in motion or in process of deformation, and it holds whether the magnetic field is constant in time or changing. However, there are cases where Faraday's law is either inadequate or difficult to use, and application of the underlying Lorentz force law is necessary. See inapplicability of Faraday's law.

If the magnetic field is fixed in time and the conducting loop moves through the field, the magnetic flux Φ_B linking the loop can change in several ways. For example, if the B-field varies with position, and the loop moves to a location with different B-field, Φ_B will change. Alternatively, if the loop changes orientation with respect to the B-field, the B ⋅ dA differential element will change because of the different angle between B and dA, also changing Φ_B. As a third example, if a portion of the circuit is swept through a uniform, time-independent B-field, and another portion of the circuit is held stationary, the flux linking the entire closed circuit can change due to the shift in relative position of the circuit's component parts with time (surface ∂Σ(t) time-dependent). In all three cases, Faraday's law of induction then predicts the EMF generated by the change in Φ_B.

Note that the Maxwell Faraday's equation implies that the Electric Field E is non conservative when the Magnetic Field B varies in time, and is not expressible as the gradient of a scalar field, and not subject to the gradient theorem since its rotational is not zero.[30][32]

The E and B fields can be replaced by the magnetic vector potential A and (scalar) electrostatic potential ϕ by

${\displaystyle \mathbf {E} =-\nabla \phi -{\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}}$

${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} =\nabla \times \mathbf {A} }$

where ∇ is the gradient, ∇⋅ is the divergence, ∇× is the curl.

The force becomes

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =q\left[-\nabla \phi -{\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}+\mathbf {v} \times (\nabla \times \mathbf {A} )\right].}$

Using an identity for the triple product this can be rewritten as,

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =q\left[-\nabla \phi -{\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}+\nabla \left(\mathbf {v} \cdot \mathbf {A} \right)-\left(\mathbf {v} \cdot \nabla \right)\mathbf {A} \right],}$

(Notice that the coordinates and the velocity components should be treated as independent variables, so the del operator acts only on ${\displaystyle \mathbf {A} }$, not on ${\displaystyle \mathbf {v} }$; thus, there is no need of using Feynman's subscript notation in the equation above). Using the chain rule, the total derivative of ${\displaystyle \mathbf {A} }$ is:

${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} \mathbf {A} }{\mathrm {d} t}}={\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}+(\mathbf {v} \cdot \nabla )\mathbf {A} }$

so that the above expression becomes:

${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =q\left[-\nabla (\phi -\mathbf {v} \cdot \mathbf {A} )-{\frac {\mathrm {d} \mathbf {A} }{\mathrm {d} t}}\right]}$.

With v = ẋ, we can put the equation into the convenient Euler–Lagrange form

where

${\displaystyle \nabla _{\mathbf {x} }={\hat {x}}{\dfrac {\partial }{\partial x}}+{\hat {y}}{\dfrac {\partial }{\partial y}}+{\hat {z}}{\dfrac {\partial }{\partial z}}}$

and

${\displaystyle \nabla _{\dot {\mathbf {x} }}={\hat {x}}{\dfrac {\partial }{\partial {\dot {x}}}}+{\hat {y}}{\dfrac {\partial }{\partial {\dot {y}}}}+{\hat {z}}{\dfrac {\partial }{\partial {\dot {z}}}}}$.

The Lagrangian for a charged particle of mass m and charge q in an electromagnetic field equivalently describes the dynamics of the particle in terms of its energy, rather than the force exerted on it. The classical expression is given by:[33]

${\displaystyle L={\frac {m}{2}}\mathbf {\dot {r}} \cdot \mathbf {\dot {r}} +q\mathbf {A} \cdot \mathbf {\dot {r}} -q\phi }$

where A and ϕ are the potential fields as above. The quantity ${\displaystyle V=q(\phi -\mathbf {A} \cdot \mathbf {\dot {r}} )}$ can be thought as a velocity-dependent potential function.[34] Using Lagrange's equations, the equation for the Lorentz force given above can be obtained again.

Derivation of Lorentz force from classical Lagrangian (SI units)

For an A field, a particle moving with velocity v = ṙ has potential momentum ${\displaystyle q\mathbf {A} (\mathbf {r} ,t)}$, so its potential energy is ${\displaystyle q\mathbf {A} (\mathbf {r} ,t)\cdot \mathbf {\dot {r}} }$. For a ϕ field, the particle's potential energy is ${\displaystyle q\phi (\mathbf {r} ,t)}$. The total potential energy is then: ${\displaystyle V=q\phi -q\mathbf {A} \cdot \mathbf {\dot {r}} }$ and the kinetic energy is: ${\displaystyle T={\frac {m}{2}}\mathbf {\dot {r}} \cdot \mathbf {\dot {r}} }$ hence the Lagrangian: ${\displaystyle L=T-V={\frac {m}{2}}\mathbf {\dot {r}} \cdot \mathbf {\dot {r}} +q\mathbf {A} \cdot \mathbf {\dot {r}} -q\phi }$ ${\displaystyle L={\frac {m}{2}}({\dot {x}}^{2}+{\dot {y}}^{2}+{\dot {z}}^{2})+q({\dot {x}}A_{x}+{\dot {y}}A_{y}+{\dot {z}}A_{z})-q\phi }$ Lagrange's equations are ${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} t}}{\frac {\partial L}{\partial {\dot {x}}}}={\frac {\partial L}{\partial x}}}$ (same for y and z). So calculating the partial derivatives: ${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} t}}{\frac {\partial L}{\partial {\dot {x}}}}&=m{\ddot {x}}+q{\frac {\mathrm {d} A_{x}}{\mathrm {d} t}}\\&=m{\ddot {x}}+{\frac {q}{\mathrm {d} t}}\left({\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial t}}dt+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial x}}dx+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial y}}dy+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial z}}dz\right)\\&=m{\ddot {x}}+q\left({\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial t}}+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial x}}{\dot {x}}+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial y}}{\dot {y}}+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial z}}{\dot {z}}\right)\\\end{aligned}}}$ ${\displaystyle {\frac {\partial L}{\partial x}}=-q{\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x}}+q\left({\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial x}}{\dot {x}}+{\frac {\partial A_{y}}{\partial x}}{\dot {y}}+{\frac {\partial A_{z}}{\partial x}}{\dot {z}}\right)}$ equating and simplifying: ${\displaystyle m{\ddot {x}}+q\left({\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial t}}+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial x}}{\dot {x}}+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial y}}{\dot {y}}+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial z}}{\dot {z}}\right)=-q{\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x}}+q\left({\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial x}}{\dot {x}}+{\frac {\partial A_{y}}{\partial x}}{\dot {y}}+{\frac {\partial A_{z}}{\partial x}}{\dot {z}}\right)}$ ${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}F_{x}&=-q\left({\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial t}}\right)+q\left[{\dot {y}}\left({\frac {\partial A_{y}}{\partial x}}-{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial y}}\right)+{\dot {z}}\left({\frac {\partial A_{z}}{\partial x}}-{\frac {\partial A_{x}}{\partial z}}\right)\right]\\&=qE_{x}+q[{\dot {y}}(\nabla \times \mathbf {A} )_{z}-{\dot {z}}(\nabla \times \mathbf {A} )_{y}]\\&=qE_{x}+q[\mathbf {\dot {r}} \times (\nabla \times \mathbf {A} )]_{x}\\&=qE_{x}+q(\mathbf {\dot {r}} \times \mathbf {B} )_{x}\end{aligned}}}$ and similarly for the y and z directions. Hence the force equation is: ${\displaystyle \mathbf {F} =q(\mathbf {E} +\mathbf {\dot {r}} \times \mathbf {B} )}$

The potential energy depends on the velocity of the particle, so the force is velocity dependent, so it is not conservative.

The relativistic Lagrangian is

${\displaystyle L=-mc^{2}{\sqrt {1-\left({\frac {\dot {\mathbf {r} }}{c}}\right)^{2}}}+q\mathbf {A} (\mathbf {r} )\cdot {\dot {\mathbf {r} }}-q\phi (\mathbf {r} )\,\!}$

The action is the relativistic arclength of the path of the particle in spacetime, minus the potential energy contribution, plus an extra contribution which quantum mechanically is an extra phase a charged particle gets when it is moving along a vector potential.

Derivation of Lorentz force from relativistic Lagrangian (SI units)

The equations of motion derived by extremizing the action (see matrix calculus for the notation): ${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} \mathbf {P} }{\mathrm {d} t}}={\frac {\partial L}{\partial \mathbf {r} }}=q{\partial \mathbf {A} \over \partial \mathbf {r} }\cdot {\dot {\mathbf {r} }}-q{\partial \phi \over \partial \mathbf {r} }\,\!}$ ${\displaystyle \mathbf {P} -q\mathbf {A} ={\frac {m{\dot {\mathbf {r} }}}{\sqrt {1-\left({\frac {\dot {\mathbf {r} }}{c}}\right)^{2}}}}\,}$ are the same as Hamilton's equations of motion: ${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} \mathbf {r} }{\mathrm {d} t}}={\frac {\partial }{\partial \mathbf {p} }}\left({\sqrt {(\mathbf {P} -q\mathbf {A} )^{2}+(mc^{2})^{2}}}+q\phi \right)\,\!}$ ${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} \mathbf {p} }{\mathrm {d} t}}=-{\partial \over \partial \mathbf {r} }\left({\sqrt {(\mathbf {P} -q\mathbf {A} )^{2}+(mc^{2})^{2}}}+q\phi \right)\,\!}$ both are equivalent to the noncanonical form: ${\displaystyle {\frac {\mathrm {d} }{\mathrm {d} t}}\left({m{\dot {\mathbf {r} }} \over {\sqrt {1-\left({\frac {\dot {\mathbf {r} }}{c}}\right)^{2}}}}\right)=q\left(\mathbf {E} +{\dot {\mathbf {r} }}\times \mathbf {B} \right).\,\!}$ This formula is the Lorentz force, representing the rate at which the EM field adds relativistic momentum to the particle.

The Lorentz force occurs in many devices, including:

• Cyclotrons and other circular path particle accelerators
• Mass spectrometers
• Velocity Filters
• Magnetrons
• Lorentz force velocimetry

In its manifestation as the Laplace force on an electric current in a conductor, this force occurs in many devices including:

The numbered references refer in part to the list immediately below.

• Feynman, Richard Phillips; Leighton, Robert B.; Sands, Matthew L. (2006). The Feynman lectures on physics (3 vol.). Pearson / Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-8053-9047-2.: volume 2.
• Griffiths, David J. (1999). Introduction to electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, [NJ.]: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-805326-X.
• Jackson, John David (1999). Classical electrodynamics (3rd ed.). New York, [NY.]: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-30932-X.

• Serway, Raymond A.; Jewett, John W., Jr. (2004). Physics for scientists and engineers, with modern physics. Belmont, [CA.]: Thomson Brooks/Cole. ISBN 0-534-40846-X.
• Srednicki, Mark A. (2007). Quantum field theory. Cambridge, [England] ; New York [NY.]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86449-7.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Lorentz force.

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Lorentz force

• Lorentz force (demonstration)
• Faraday's law: Tankersley and Mosca
• Notes from Physics and Astronomy HyperPhysics at Georgia State University; see also home page
• Interactive Java applet on the magnetic deflection of a particle beam in a homogeneous magnetic field by Wolfgang Bauer
• The Lorentz force formula on a wall directly opposite Lorentz's home in downtown Leiden