Manganese nodule

Nodules lie on the seabed sediment, often partly or completely buried. They vary greatly in abundance, in some cases touching one another and covering more than 70% of the sea floor. The total amount of polymetallic nodules on the sea floor was estimated at 500 billion tons by Alan A. Archer of the London Geological Museum in 1981.

Polymetallic nodules are found in both shallow (e.g. the Baltic Sea[3]) and deeper waters (e.g. the central Pacific), even in lakes,[4] and are thought to have been a feature of the seas and oceans at least since the deep oceans oxidised in the Ediacaran period over 540 million years ago.[5]

Polymetallic nodules were discovered in 1868 in the Kara Sea, in the Arctic Ocean of Siberia. During the scientific expeditions of HMS Challenger (1872–1876), they were found to occur in most oceans of the world.[6]

Their composition varies by location, and sizeable deposits have been found in the following areas:

• Penrhyn Basin near within the Cook Islands.[7]
• North central Pacific Ocean in a region called the Clarion Clipperton Zone (CCZ) roughly midway between Hawaii and Clipperton Islands.[2]
• Peru Basin in the southeast Pacific,[8] and
• Southern tropical Indian Ocean in a region termed the Indian Ocean Nodule Field (IONF) roughly 500 km SE of Diego Garcia Island.[9]
• In the Eastern Pacific, including the area around Juan Fernández Islands and the abyssal plain offshore Loa River.[10]

The largest of these deposits in terms of nodule abundance and metal concentration occur in the Clarion Clipperton Zone on vast abyssal plains in the deep ocean between 4,000 and 6,000 m (13,000 and 20,000 ft). The International Seabed Authority estimates that the total amount of nodules in the Clarion Clipperton Zone exceeds 21 billions of tons (Bt), containing about 5.95 Bt of manganese, 0.27 Bt of nickel, 0.23 Bt of copper and 0.05 Bt of cobalt.[2]

All of these deposits are in international waters apart from the Penrhyn Basin, which lies within the exclusive economic zone of the Cook Islands.

On the seabed the abundance of nodules varies and is likely controlled by the thickness and stability of a geochemically active layer that forms at the seabed.[11] Pelagic sediment type and seabed bathymetry (or geomorphology) likely influence the characteristics of the geochemically active layer.

Nodule growth is one of the slowest of all known geological phenomena, on the order of a centimeter over several million years.[12] Several processes are hypothesized to be involved in the formation of nodules, including the precipitation of metals from seawater (hydrogenous), the remobilization of manganese in the water column (diagenetic), the derivation of metals from hot springs associated with volcanic activity (hydrothermal), the decomposition of basaltic debris by seawater (halmyrolitic) and the precipitation of metal hydroxides through the activity of microorganisms (biogenic[13]). Several of these processes may operate concurrently or they may follow one another during the formation of a nodule.

Polymetallic nodules

The mineral composition of manganese-bearing minerals is dependent on how the nodules are formed; sedimentary nodules, which have a lower Mn²⁺ content than diagenetic, are dominated by Fe-vernadite, Mn-feroxyhyte, and asbolane-buserite while diagenetic nodules are dominated by buserite I, birnessite, todorokite, and asbolane-buserite.[14] The growth types termed diagenetic and hydrogenetic reflect suboxic and oxic growth, which in turn could relate to periods of interglacial and glacial climate. It has been estimated that suboxic-diagenetic type 2 layers make up about 50–60% of the chemical inventory of the CCZ nodules whereas oxic-hydrogenetic type 1 layers comprise about 35–40%.The remaining part (5–10%) of the nodules consists of incorporated sediment particles occurring along cracks and pores.[15]

The chemical composition of nodules varies according to the kind of manganese minerals and the size and characteristics of the core. Those of greatest economic interest contain manganese (27–30%), nickel (1.25–1.5 %), copper (1–1.4 %) and cobalt (0.2–0.25 %). Other constituents include iron (6%), silicon (5%) and aluminium (3%), with lesser amounts of calcium, sodium, magnesium, potassium, titanium and barium, along with hydrogen and oxygen as well as water of crystallization and free water.

A wide range of trace elements and trace minerals are found in nodules with many of these incorporated from the seabed sediment, which itself includes particles carried as dust from all over the planet before settling to the seabed.[2]

Interest in the potential exploitation of polymetallic nodules generated a great deal of activity among prospective mining consortia in the 1960s and 1970s. Almost half a billion dollars was invested in identifying potential deposits and in research and development of technology for mining and processing nodules. These initial undertakings were carried out primarily by four multinational consortia composed of companies from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, West Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, Japan, and two groups of private companies and agencies from France and Japan. There were also three publicly sponsored entities from the Soviet Union, India and China.

In the late seventies, two of the international joint ventures succeeded in collecting several hundred-ton quantities of manganese nodules from the abyssal plains (18,000 feet (5.5 km) + depth) of the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean.[11] Significant quantities of nickel (the primary target) as well as copper and cobalt were subsequently extracted from this "ore" using both pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical methods. In the course of these projects, a number of ancillary developments evolved, including the use of near-bottom towed side-scan sonar array to assay the nodule population density on the abyssal silt whilst simultaneously performing a sub-bottom profile with a derived, vertically oriented, low-frequency acoustic beam.

The technology and experience developed during the course of this project were never commercialized because the last two decades of the 20th century saw an excess of nickel production. The estimated $3.5-billion (1978 US dollars) investment to implement commercialization was an additional factor. Sumitomo Metal Mining continues to maintain a small (place-keeping) organization in this field.

Kennecott Copper had explored the potential profits in manganese nodule mining and found that it was not worth the cost. On top of the environmental issues and the fact that the profits had to be shared, there was no cheap way to get the manganese nodules off the sea floor.

Since the late 1970s, deep sea technology has improved significantly: including widespread and low cost use of navigation technology such as Global Positioning System (GPS) and ultra-short baseline (USBL); survey technology such as multibeam echosounder (MBES) and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV); and intervention technology including remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) and high power umbilical cables. There is also improved technology that could be used in mining including pumps, tracked and screw drive rovers, rigid and flexible drilling risers, and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene rope. Mining is considered to be similar to the potato harvest on land, which involves mining a field partitioned into long, narrow strips. The mining support vessel follows the mining route of the seafloor mining tools, picking up the about potato-sized nodules from the seafloor.[16][17][18]

By the time the International Seabed Authority was in place in 1994, interest in the extraction of nodules waned. Three factors were largely responsible:

• Difficulty and expense of developing and operating mining technology that could economically remove the nodules from depths of five or six kilometers and transport them to the ocean surface
• High taxes the international community would charge for the mining, and
• Continuing availability of the key minerals from land-based sources at market prices.

At this time, the commercial extraction of polymetallic nodules was not considered likely to occur during the next two decades.

In recent times, nickel and other metal supply has needed to turn to higher cost deposits in order to meet increased demand, and commercial interest in nodules has revived. The International Seabed Authority has granted new exploration contracts and is progressing development of a Mining Code for The Area, with most interest being in the Clarion Clipperton Zone.[19]

Since 2011, a number of commercial companies have received exploration contracts. These include subsidiaries of larger companies like Lockheed Martin, DEME, Keppel Corporation and China Minmetals, and smaller companies like Nauru Ocean Resources and Tonga Offshore Mining.[11]

The renewed interest in mining nodules has led to increased concern and scrutiny regarding possible environmental impacts.

After the Second World War the United Nations started a lengthy process of developing international treaties that moved away from the then held concept of freedom of the seas.

By 1972, the promise of nodule exploitation was one of the main factors that led developing nations to propose that the deep seabed beyond the limits of national jurisdiction should be treated as a "common heritage of mankind", with proceeds to be shared between those who developed this resource and the rest of the international community. This initiative eventually resulted in the adoption (1982) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and after negotiation of Part XI by 1994, the establishment of the International Seabed Authority, with responsibility for controlling all deep-sea mining in international areas. The first legislative achievement of this intergovernmental organization was the adoption (2000) of regulations for prospecting and exploration for polymetallic nodules, with special provisions to protect the marine environment from any adverse effects. The Authority followed this up (2001–2002) by signing 15-year contracts with seven private and public entities, giving them exclusive rights to explore for nodules in specified tracts of the seabed, each 75,000 square kilometers in size. The United States, whose companies were among the key actors in the earlier period of exploration, remains outside this compact as a non-party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Per UNCLOS the Authority has four main functions. Essentially these are:

• To administer the mineral resources of the seabed in the Area;
• To enact rules, regulations and procedures relating to these resources;
• To promote and encourage marine scientific research and development in the Area;
• To protect and conserve the natural resources of the Area and prevent significant damage to the environment.

Currently the International Seabed Authority is defining and debating aspects of its Mining Code which encompasses polymetallic sulphides (seafloor massive sulphide deposits) and cobalt-rich crusts as well as polymetallic nodules. The Mining Code includes exploration and draft exploitation regulations, an environmental management plan for the Clarion Clipperton Zone, and recommendations for the guidance of contractors in terms of reporting, environmental impact assessment, expenditure reporting and training for scientists and engineers from developing nations.[20]

In addition to the Convention on Biological Diversity, on 19 June 2015 the General Assembly of the UN adapted resolution A/RES/69/292, "Development of an international legally-binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction".[21] This resolution calls for a preparatory committee to be established to examine what this instrument could look like and what it would address specifically in addition to the existing environmental parts of UNCLOS. It would take into account the various reports of the co-chairs on the work of the relevant Ad Hoc Open-ended Informal Working Group. In due course an intergovernmental conference would review and debate the recommendations of the preparatory committee.

Any future mining of nodules in The Area needs to be authorised by the International Seabed Authority and would need to quantify impact in advance via an environmental impact statement and associated environmental management plan. These assessments, monitoring plans and guidance controls would likely work at the scale of proposed operations.

The International Seabed Authority already has an environmental management plan that considers the entire Clarion Clipperton Zone and that includes reference areas that are not available for mining (termed Areas of Particular Environmental Interest).[22]

Environmental assessments would need to have an unbiased scientific basis, and to account for:

• the remote nature of the nodules making detailed data collection challenging;
• the large variety in scale (e.g. sub-decimeter nodule communities spread over thousands of kilometers) in terms of ecosystem function and biodiversity;
• the severity and scale of local impacts (such as habitat removal, resedimentation).

Past environmental studies such as the Deep Ocean Mining Environmental Study (DOMES) and resultant benthic impact experiments (BIE) concluded in part that trial mining at a reasonable scale would likely help best constrain real impacts from any commercial mining.[23]

Research shows that polymetallic nodule fields are hotspots of abundance and diversity for a highly vulnerable abyssal fauna.[24] Nodule mining could affect tens of thousands of square kilometers of these deep sea ecosystems. Nodule regrowth takes decades to millions of years and that would make such mining an unsustainable and nonrenewable practice. Any prediction about the effects of mining is extremely uncertain. Thus, nodule mining could cause habitat alteration, direct mortality of benthic creatures, or suspension of sediment, which can smother filter feeders.[25] Future environmental impact studies should address the impact on disruption and release of methane clathrate deposits in the deep oceans.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Manganese nodule.

• International Seabed Authority
• Project Azorian
• USNS Glomar Explorer (T-AG-193)
• Manganese oxide

• Abramowski, T.; Stoyanova, V. (2012). "Deep-Sea Polymetallic Nodules: Renewed Interest as Resources for Environmentally Sustainable Development". Proc 12th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2012. pp. 515–522.
• Abramowski, T. (2016). Value chain of deep seabed mining, Book: Deep sea mining value chain: organization, technology and development, pp 9–18, Interoceanmetal Joint Organization
• Cronan, D. S. (1980). Underwater Minerals. London: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-197480-0.
• Cronan, D. S. (2000). Handbook of Marine Mineral Deposits. Boca Raton: CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-8429-5.
• Cronan, D. S. (2001). "Manganese nodules". In Steele, J.; Turekian, K.; Thorpe, S. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 1526–1533. ISBN 978-0-12-227430-5.
• Earney, F. C. (1990). Marine Mineral Resources. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-02255-2.
• Roy, S. (1981). Manganese Deposits. London: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0126010800.
• Teleki, P. G.; Dobson, M. R.; Moore, J. R.; von Stackelberg, U. (1987). Marine Minerals: Advances in Research and Resource Assessment. Dordrecht: D. Riedel. ISBN 978-90-277-2436-6.

• Report on a World Almanac 1997 documentary Universe Beneath the Sea claiming evidence of rapid formation
• The International Seabed Authority