Midhurst (UK Parliament constituency)
Midhurst was a parliamentary borough in Sussex, which elected two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons from 1311 until 1832, and then one member from 1832 until 1885, when the constituency was abolished. Before the Great Reform Act of 1832, it was one of the most notorious of England's rotten boroughs.
Midhurst | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1311–1885 | |
Number of members | two (1311–1832); one (1832–1885) |
Replaced by | Horsham |
History
From its foundation in the 14th century until 1832, the borough consisted of part of the parish of Midhurst, a small market town in Sussex. Much of the town as it existed by the 19th century was outside this ancient boundary, but the boundary was in any case academic since the townsfolk had no votes. As a contemporary, writer, Sir George Trevelyan explained in writing about the general election of 1768,[1]
the right of election rested in a few small holdings, on which no human being resided, distinguished among the pastures and the stubble that surrounded them by a large stone set up on end in the middle of each portion.
No doubt these "burgage tenements" had once included houses, but long before the 19th century it was notorious that several of them consisted solely of the marker stones, set in the wall of the landowner's estate. Even compared with most of the other burgage boroughs this was an extreme situation, and during the parliamentary debates on the Reform Bills in 1831 and 1832 the reformers made much play of Midhurst's "niches in a wall" as an example of the abuses they wished to correct.
The natural result of a burgage franchise was to encourage some local landowner to attempt to buy up a majority of the tenements, thereby ensuring absolute control of the choice of both of the members of Parliament, and this happened at an early stage in many other burgage boroughs. In Midhurst, however, there was still no single proprietor by the middle of the 18th century. The most influential figure was The Viscount Montagu, who in 1754 claimed to own 104 burgages, but Sir John Peachey owned 40 and there were more than 70 independent burgage holders. Montagu could usually control matters since he could count on the support of at least half of the independent voters, but for many years there had been an agreement not to force matters, and the Peacheys were allowed one of the two seats.
However, after 1754 Montagu began to buy up the independent burgages; meanwhile Peachey sold his property in the borough to Sir William Peere Williams, who in his turn also tried to increase his holding. At the general election of 1761, the two proprietors seem to have been unsure which would prove to have a majority, and both the Prime Minister and opposition leaders were drawn into the negotiations before a compromise could be reached to avoid a contest. However, when Williams was killed during the capture of Belle Île later the same year, his burgages seem to have been bought by Montagu, who thereafter had a clear field. In 1832 there were still said to be 148 burgage tenements, but only 41 qualified electors, of whom no more than 20 voted. Midhurst was now an undisputed pocket borough: its elections consisted, as Trevelyan related of 1768, in a legal fiction:,[1]
Viscount Montagu ... when an election was in prospect, assigned a few of [the burgage tenements] to his servants, with instructions to nominate the members and then make back the property to their employer.
In fact by 1761, Montagu's political affairs were being directed by his son, Anthony Browne, who put the borough's seats at the disposal of his parliamentary leader, Lord Holland – Holland used one of them to bring his son, Charles James Fox, into Parliament even though underage. But Holland died before the 1774 election, and Browne (by now the 7th Viscount Montagu) being short of money sold the nomination for both seats to the Treasury in return for a government pension.
After the 7th Viscount's death in 1787, the Montagu property in the borough was sold to the Earl of Egremont for £40,000. The earl used the seat to return two of his younger brothers, Percy and Charles William to the Commons, with Charles only serving one parliament for Midhurst.[2] Egremont in turn sold it to Lord Carrington, who used it more often than not to provide a parliamentary seat for one of his many brothers or nephews.
In 1831, the population of the borough was 1,478, and the first draft of the Reform Bill proposed to abolish it altogether. But after argument the government recognised that it was possible to make a more respectably-sized constituency by expanding the boundaries to bring in the whole of the town and some neighbouring parishes, and Midhurst was reprieved. The expanded borough consisted of the whole of nine parishes and part of ten others, and had a population of 5,627. Nevertheless, Midhurst was permitted to keep only one of its two seats. Under the reformed franchise, its electorate at the election of 1832 was 252; but this was not sufficient to lead to more competitive elections, since the MP was returned unopposed at every election between 1832 and 1868.
Midhurst was eventually abolished as a separate constituency in the boundary changes of 1885, the town being included from that date in the North Western (or Horsham) county division.
Members of Parliament
1311–1640
Parliament | First member | Second member |
---|---|---|
1386 | Henry Exton | Thomas Smith [3] |
1388 (Feb) | Richard Hobekyn | Robert Hynkele [3] |
1388 (Sep) | William Baggele | John Sarceller [3] |
1390 (Jan) | Richard Hobekyn | John Mory [3] |
1390 (Nov) | ||
1391 | ||
1393 | Thomas Clerk | John G(renettour?) [3] |
1394 | ||
1395 | John Grenettour | Robert atte Rode [3] |
1397 (Jan) | William atte Barre | John Grenettour [3] |
1397 (Sep) | William Baggele | Thomas Sarceller [3] |
1399 | Michael Baggele | John Rombald [3] |
1401 | Gregory Fuller | Robert Pechard [3] |
1402 | Robert Cooper | John Ive II [3] |
1404 (Jan) | John Symkyn | Thomas Westlond [3] |
1404 (Oct) | ||
1406 | William Brereton | John Stapleton I [3] |
1407 | Thomas Lucas | John Puckepole [3] |
1410 | ||
1411 | ||
1413 (Feb) | ||
1413 (May) | John Vincent | Thomas Walsh [3] |
1414 (Apr) | ||
1414 (Nov) | John Walsh | John Rombald [3] |
1415 | John Ive II | John Sewall |
1416 (Mar) | John Mousehole | John Sewall [3] |
1416 (Oct) | ||
1417 | William Chyngford | Gregory Tanner [3] |
1419 | Walter Lucas | Thomas Russell [3] |
1420 | Michael Maunser | Gregory Pedlyng [3] |
1421 (May) | William Brereton | William Chyngford [3] |
1421 (Dec) | William Brereton | Simon Lopeshurst [3] |
1425 | John Sewall | ? Westlond |
1426 | Walter Lucas | |
1510–1523 | No names known[4] | |
1529 | George Gifford | John Bassett [4] |
1536 | ? | |
1539 | ? | |
1542 | Nicholas Dering | John Bourne [4] |
1545 | ? | |
1547 | Edmund Ford | William Wightman [4] |
1553 (Mar) | John Fitzwilliam | William Denton [4] |
1553 (Oct) | Sir Thomas Lovell | William Denton [4] |
1554 (Apr) | Michael Wentworth | William Denton[4] |
1554 (Nov) | Thomas Harvey | William Denton[4] |
1555 | William Denton | Henry Heighes[4] |
1558 | Thomas Harvey | William Denton |
1558/9 | William Denton | Henry Heighes [5] |
1562/3 | Edward Banester | William Denton, died and replaced 1566 by John Fenner [5] |
1571 | Thomas Bowyer | Richard Porter [5] |
1572 | Thomas Holcroft | Thomas Bowyer [5] |
1584 | Edward More | Thomas Churcher [5] |
1586 | Thomas Lewknor | Thomas Churcher [5] |
1588/9 | Samuel Foxe | Thomas Churcher [5] |
1593 | John Boys | Thomas Churcher [5] |
1597 | Lewis Lewknor | James Smyth [5] |
1601 | Richard Browne | Michael Haydon [5] |
1604–1611 | Francis Neville | Sir Richard Weston |
1614 | Thomas Bowyer | William Courteman |
1621–1622 | John Smith | Richard Lewknor |
1624 | Sir Anthony Manie | Richard Lewknor |
1625 | Richard Lewknor | Samuel Owfield |
1626 | Richard Lewknor | Sir Henry Spiller |
1628 | Christopher Lewknor | Edward Savage |
1629–1640 | No Parliaments summoned |
1640–1832
1832–1885
Election results
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Abel Smith | Unopposed | |||
Whig | George Smith | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig gain from Tory |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | George Robert Smith | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Martin Tucker Smith | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | c. 41 | ||||
Whig hold | |||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Frederick Spencer | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 252 | ||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Stephen Poyntz | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 246 | ||||
Whig hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Stephen Poyntz | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 248 | ||||
Whig hold |
Poyntz resigned, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Frederick Spencer | Unopposed | |||
Whig hold |
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Horace Seymour | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 289 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
Seymour resigned by accepting the office of Steward of the Chiltern Hundreds in order to contest a by-election at Antrim, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 304 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1850s
Walpole was appointed Home Secretary, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 279 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Walpole resigned, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Warren | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Warren | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 411 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Warren resigned after being appointed a Master in Lunacy, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | John Hardy | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Townley Mitford | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 429 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1860s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Townley Mitford | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 309 | ||||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Townley Mitford | 375 | 58.9 | N/A | |
Liberal | Daniel Adolphus Lange[22][23] | 262 | 41.1 | New | |
Majority | 113 | 17.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 637 | 63.3 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,007 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Perceval | 530 | 68.4 | N/A | |
Conservative | William Townley Mitford | 185 | 23.9 | −35.0 | |
Liberal | John Patrick Murrough | 60 | 7.7 | −33.4 | |
Majority | 345 | 44.5 | +26.7 | ||
Turnout | 775 | 76.8 | +13.5 | ||
Registered electors | 1,009 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A |
Perceval succeeded to the peerage, becoming Earl of Egmont, and causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Holland | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Holland | 501 | 63.9 | −4.5 | |
Liberal | Charles Woodward Wallis[24] | 283 | 36.1 | +28.4 | |
Majority | 218 | 27.8 | −16.7 | ||
Turnout | 784 | 75.2 | −1.6 | ||
Registered electors | 1,042 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −8.9 |
References
- Robert Beatson, A Chronological Register of Both Houses of Parliament (London: Longman, Hurst, Res & Orme, 1807)
- Michael Brock, The Great Reform Act (London: Hutchinson, 1973)
- D Brunton & D H Pennington, Members of the Long Parliament (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1954)
- Cobbett's Parliamentary history of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the year 1803 (London: Thomas Hansard, 1808)
- F W S Craig, British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885 (2nd edition, Aldershot: Parliamentary Research Services, 1989)
- Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, Third Series, Volume 3 (1831)
- Lewis Namier & John Brooke, The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1754–1790 (London: HMSO, 1964)
- J. E. Neale, The Elizabethan House of Commons (London: Jonathan Cape, 1949)
- T. H. B. Oldfield, The Representative History of Great Britain and Ireland (London: Baldwin, Cradock & Joy, 1816)
- J Holladay Philbin, Parliamentary Representation 1832 – England and Wales (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965)
- Edward Porritt and Annie G Porritt, The Unreformed House of Commons (Cambridge University Press, 1903)
- Frederic A Youngs, jr, Guide to the Local Administrative Units of England, Vol I (London: Royal Historical Society, 1979)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "M" (part 2)
Notes
- G O Trevelyan, Life of Fox, quoted by Porritt
- Thorne, R. G (1986). The House of Commons, 1790–1820. History of Parliament Trust. ISBN 9780436521010. Retrieved 9 December 2010.
- "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
- "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
- "History of Parliament". History of Parliament Trust. Retrieved 25 November 2011.
- The election of November 1640 was disputed. On 6 January 1641 the House of Commons resolved that "Mr Thomas May and Dr Chaworth, elected for this borough, shall sit till the election be avoided"; but a further resolution on 15 February decided that "Mr Cawley and Mr May are well returned".
- Orme was initially declared re-elected in 1708, but on petition his election was declared void
- Mackworth was also elected for Cardiff, which he chose to represent, and never sat for Midhurst
- Tudway was also elected for Wells, which he chose to represent, and never sat for Midhurst
- St John was also elected for Newport (Isle of Wight), which he chose to represent, and never sat for Midhurst
- Lethieullier was also elected for Andover, which he chose to represent, and never sat for Midhurst
- Created The Lord Glenbervie (in the Peerage of Ireland), November 1800
- Smith was also elected for Leicester, which he chose to represent, and did not sit for Midhurst in this Parliament
- Smith was also elected for Nottingham, which he chose to represent, and did not sit for Midhurst in this Parliament
- Wickham was also elected for Callington, which he chose to represent, and never sat for Midhurst
- Stooks Smith, Henry (1845). The Parliaments of England, from 1st George I., to the Present Time. Vol II: Oxfordshire to Wales Inclusive. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co. pp. 87–90. Retrieved 26 November 2018 – via Google Books.
- "Hampshire Advertiser". 23 December 1837. p. 2. Retrieved 26 November 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Coventry Standard". 22 December 1837. pp. 2–3. Retrieved 26 November 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- Churton, Edward (1838). The Assembled Commons or Parliamentary Biographer: 1838. p. 187. Retrieved 26 November 2018 – via Google Books.
- Spencer, Howard. "Midhurst". The History of Parliament. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832-1885 (e-book)
|format=
requires|url=
(help) (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. pp. 211–212. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3. - "Mr. Lange at Worthing". Sussex Weekly Advertiser. 27 May 1865. p. 3. Retrieved 4 March 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "The Sussex Elections". Brighton Gazette. 19 November 1868. p. 5. Retrieved 4 March 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- "Election Preparations". Belfast Telegraph. County Antrim, Northern Ireland. 20 March 1880. p. 3. Retrieved 21 December 2017 – via British Newspaper Archive.