Mitchell v MNR

Mitchell v MNR, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 911 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on aboriginal rights under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. The court held that Mitchell's claim to an aboriginal right to import goods across the CanadaUS border was invalid as he was unable to present enough evidence showing that the importation was an integral part of the band's distinctive culture.

Mitchell v MNR
Hearing: 16 June 2000
Judgment: May 24, 2001
Full case nameMinister of National Revenue v Grand Chief Michael Mitchell also known as Kanentakeron
Citations2001 SCC 33
Docket No.27066
Prior historyAPPEAL from Mitchell v. M.N.R., 1998 CanLII 9104 (2 November 1998), affirming in part Mitchell v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 1997 CanLII 5266 (27 June 1997)
RulingAppeal allowed
Court membership
Chief Justice: Beverley McLachlin
Puisne Justices: Claire L'Heureux-Dubé, Charles Gonthier, Frank Iacobucci, John C. Major, Michel Bastarache, Ian Binnie, Louise Arbour, Louis LeBel
Reasons given
MajorityMcLachlin CJ, joined by Gonthier, Iacobucci, Arbour and LeBel JJ
ConcurrenceBinnie J, joined by Major J
L'Heureux-Dubé and Bastarache JJ took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

In 1988, Grand Chief Michael Mitchell, a Mohawk of Akwesasne, attempted to bring goods from the US into Canada. At the border he declared everything that he had purchased in the US but refused to pay any duty on it, claiming that he had an aboriginal right to bring goods across the border.

At trial, the Federal Court agreed with Mitchell and held that there was an aboriginal right to import goods. The decision was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal.

The Supreme Court overturned the decision, and held that Mitchell was required to pay duty for all of the goods he imported.

See also


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.