Portia fimbriata

Portia fimbriata, sometimes called the fringed jumping spider,[2] is a jumping spider (family Salticidae) found in Australia and Southeast Asia. Adult females have bodies 6.8 to 10.5 millimetres long, while those of adult males are 5.2 to 6.5 millimetres long.[3] Both sexes have a generally dark brown carapace, reddish brown chelicerae ("fangs"), a brown underside, dark brown palps with white hairs, and dark brown abdomens with white spots on the upper side. Both sexes have fine, faint markings and soft fringes of hair, and the legs are spindly and fringed. However, specimens from New Guinea and Indonesia have orange-brown carapaces and yellowish abdomens. In all species of the genus Portia, the abdomen distends when the spider is well fed or producing eggs.

Further information: Portia (spider)

Portia fimbriata
Female P. fimbriata
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Araneae
Infraorder: Araneomorphae
Family: Salticidae
Genus: Portia
Species:
P. fimbriata
Binomial name
Portia fimbriata
Synonyms[1]
  • Salticus fimbriatus Doleschall, 1859
  • Sinis fimbriatus (Doleschall, 1859)
  • Linus fimbriatus (Doleschall, 1859)
  • Linus alticeps Pocock, 1899
  • Boethoportia ocellata Hogg, 1915

The hunting tactics of Portia are versatile and adaptable. All members of Portia have instinctive hunting tactics for their most common prey, but can improvise by trial and error against unfamiliar prey or in unfamiliar situations, and then remember the new approach.[4] There are differences in the hunting tactics of the regional populations of P. fimbriata. Those in Australia's Northern Territory are poor at hunting jumping spiders and better against non-salticid web-building spiders and against insects. The Sri Lanka variant is fair against other jumping spiders, and good against web spiders and insects. P. fimbriata in Queensland is an outstanding predator of other jumping spiders and of web spiders, but poor against insects. The Queensland variant use a unique "cryptic stalking" technique which prevents most jumping spider prey from identifying this P. fimbriata as a predator, or even as an animal at all. Some jumping spider prey have partial defences against the cryptic stalking technique. All types of prey spiders occasionally counter-attack, but all Portia species have very good defences, starting with especially tough skin.

When meeting another of the same species, P. fimbriata does not use cryptic stalking but displays by moving quickly and smoothly. In P. fimbriata from Queensland, contests between males usually are very brief and do no damage. Contests between Portia females are usually long and violent, and the victor may evict a loser and then eat the loser's eggs – but victorious females of P. fimbriata from Queensland do not kill and eat the losing female. If a P. fimbriata male from Queensland displays to a female, she may run away or she may charge at him.[c] If the pair reach agreement after this, they will copulate if she is mature, and if she is sub-adult he will cohabit in her nest until she finishes moulting, and then they copulate. P. fimbriata typically copulates much quicker than other jumping spiders. Unlike in other Portia species, females of P. fimbriata do not eat their mates during courting, nor during or after copulation.

Body structure and appearance

Females of the jumping spider Portia fimbriata have bodies 6.8 to 10.5 millimetres long, while those of adult males are 5.2 to 6.5 millimetres long.[3]:100 The Queensland variety is typically smaller than the Northern Territory variety.[2] The cephalothorax is about 4 millimetres long and 3 millimetres wide, and the abdomen about 4 millimetres long and 2.2 millimetres wide.[5] The front of the cephalothorax is large and angular, and the face is broad, high and flat.[6] In Australia and Taiwan, both sexes have a generally dark brown carapace, reddish brown chelicerae ("jaws"), a brown underside, and dark brown palps with white hairs.[5] Both sexes also have fine, faint markings and soft fringes of hair.[7]:6 However, the female has a white fringe just above the chelicerae, while the back half of the male's cephalothorax has a white band round the bottom edge and a white groove down the back.[5] While male spiders' palps are larger than females',[8]:572–573 the palps of P. fimbriata females have a fringe of hair that makes them look about as larger as males'.[2] The abdomens of both sexes are dark brown, with white spots on the upper side.[5] Wanless' female from New Guinea has an orange carapace and chelicerae with sooty markings, palps mainly light yellow, legs orange-brown legs, and abdomen light yellow. Wanless also found a male from the Amboina area in Indonesia, showing an orange-brown carapace and chelicerae, yellow-brown to orange-brown palps, orange-brown legs and a light yellowish abdomen.[3]:99–100

Movement

When not hunting for prey or a mate, Portia species adopt a special posture, called the "cryptic rest posture", pulling their legs in close to the body and their palps back beside the chelicerae ("jaws"), which obscures the outlines of these appendages. When walking, all Portia species have a slow, "choppy" gait that preserves their concealment: pausing often and at irregular intervals; waving their legs continuously and their palps jerkily up and down; and moving each appendage out of time with the others[9][7]:6 and continuously varying the speed and timing.[10]:418 Portia′s walk is unlike that of any other spider, and this gait and the spider's fringes gives the appearance of light flickering through the forest canopy and reflecting from a piece of detritus.[9][7]:6 In Queensland, P. fimbriata walks and waves more jerkily and about twice as slowly as other Portia species, including P. fimbriata in other areas.[11]:433

If disturbed, most Portia species leap upwards about 100 to 150 millimetres, often from the cryptic rest pose, and often over a wide trajectory. Usually Portia then either freezes or runs about 100 millimetres and then freezes. However, P. fimbriata in Queensland rarely runs or leaps.[11]:434

Senses
"Squared-off" cephalothorax and eye pattern of jumping spiders

Although other spiders can also jump, salticids including Portia fimbriata have significantly better vision than other spiders,[12]:521[13] and their main eyes are more acute in daylight than a cat's and 10 times more acute than a dragonfly's.[4] Jumping spiders have eight eyes, the two large ones in the center-and-front position (the anterior-median eyes, also called "principal eyes"[14]:51) housed in tubes in the cephalothorax and providing acute vision. The other six are secondary eyes, positioned along the sides of the carapace and acting mainly as movement detectors.[4][15]:16 In most jumping spiders, the middle pair of secondary eyes are very small and have no known function, but those of Portia species are relatively large, and function as well as its other secondary eyes. [11]:424[16]:232 The main eyes focus accurately on an object at distances from approximately 2 centimetres to infinity,[14]:51 and in practice can see up to about 75 centimetres.[14]:53 Like all jumping spiders, P. fimbriata can take in only a small visual field at one time,[6] as the most acute part of a main eye can see all of a circle up to 12 millimeters wide at 20 centimeters away, or up to 18 millimeters wide at 30 centimeters away.[17][a]

Generally the jumping spider subfamily Spartaeinae, which includes the genus Portia, cannot discriminate objects at such long distances as the members of subfamilies Salticinae or Lyssomaninae can. However, the main eyes of Portia have vision about as acute as the best of the jumping spiders: the salticine Mogrus neglectus can distinguish prey and conspecifics up to 320 millimetres away (42 times its own body length), while P. fimbriata can distinguish these up to 280 millimetres (47 times its own body length).[18] The main eyes of P. fimbriata can also identify features of the scenery up to 85 times its own body length, which helps the spider to find detours.[7]:21

However, a Portia takes a relatively long time to see objects, possibly because getting a good image out of such tiny eyes is a complex process and needs a lot of scanning.[d] This makes a Portia vulnerable to much larger predators such as birds, frogs and mantises, which a Portia often cannot identify because of the other predator's size.[4]

Spiders, like other arthropods, have sensors, often modified setae (bristles), for smell, taste, touch and vibration, protruding through their cuticle ("skin").[19]:532–533 A Portia can sense vibrations from surfaces, and use these for mating and for hunting other spiders in total darkness. It can use air- and surface "smells" to detect prey which it often meets, to identify members of the same species, to recognise familiar members, and to determine the sex of other member of the same species.[7]:13

Hunting and feeding

Hunting tactics of the genus Portia

Members of the genus Portia have been called "eight-legged cats", as their hunting tactics are as versatile and adaptable as a lion's.[4] All members of Portia have instinctive tactics for their most common prey, but can improvise by trial and error against unfamiliar prey or in unfamiliar situations, and then remember the new approach. They can also make detours to find the best attack angle against dangerous prey, even when the best detour takes a Portia out of visual contact with the prey,[4] and sometimes the planned route leads to abseiling down a silk thread and biting the prey from behind. Such detours may take up to an hour,[20] and a Portia usually picks the best route even if it needs to walk past an incorrect route.[10]:422

Female P. fimbriata in its web

While most jumping spiders prey mainly on insects and by active hunting,[21]:340 females of Portia also build webs to catch prey directly.[4][20] These "capture webs" are funnel-shaped and widest at the top[22][23]:513 and are about 4,000 cubic centimetres in volume.[11]:429–431 A Portia often builds her own web on to one of a web-based non-salticid spider.[4] When not joined to another spiders', a P. fimbriata female's capture web is generally suspended from rigid foundations such as boughs and rocks.[11]:432 Males of Portia do not build capture webs.[11]:429

A Portia can pluck another spider's web with a virtually unlimited range of signals, either to lure the prey out into the open or calming the prey by monotonously repeating the same signal while the Portia walks slowly close enough to bite it.[21]:340–341 Such tactics enable Portia species to take web spiders, such as Holocnemus pluchei [24] from 10% to 200% of a Portia′s size,[4] and Portia species hunt in all types of webs.[23]:491 In contrast, other cursorial spiders generally have difficulty moving on webs, and web-building spiders find it difficult to move in webs unlike those they build. When hunting in another spider's web, a Portia′s slow, choppy movements and the flaps on its legs make it resemble leaf detritus caught in the web and blown in a breeze.[23]:514 P. fimbriata and some other Portia species use breezes and other disturbances as "smokescreens" in which these predators can approach web spiders more quickly, and revert to a more cautious approach when the disturbance disappears.[25]:313 A few web spiders run far away when they sense the un-rhythmical gait of a Portia entering the web – a reaction Wilcox and Jackson call "Portia panic".[10]:418

If a large insect is struggling in a web, Portia usually waits for up to a day until the insect stops struggling, even if the prey is thoroughly stuck.[11]:448 When an insect is stuck in a web owned by P. labiata, P. schultzi or any regional variant of P. fimbriata, and next to a web spider's web, the web spider sometimes enters the Portia′s web, and the Portia pursues and catches the web spider.[11]:440–441, 444

The webs of spiders on which Portia species prey sometimes contain dead insects and other arthropods which are uneaten or partly eaten. P. fimbriata (in Queensland) and some other Portia species such as P. labiata and P. schultzi sometimes scavenge these corpses if the corpses are not obviously decayed.[11]:448

When using its own web to catch other species of salticids, P. fimbriata conceals its conspicuous palps, which it does not do when stalking a web-spider or occasionally a moving fly.[17]

All Portia species eat eggs of other spiders, including eggs of their own species and of other cursorial spiders, and can extract eggs from cases ranging from the flimsy ones of Pholcus to the tough papery ones of Philoponella. While only P. fimbriata (in Queensland) captures cursorial spiders in their nests, all Portia species steal eggs from empty nests of cursorial spiders.[11]:448

The venom of Portia is unusually powerful against spiders.[23]:491 When a Portia stabs a small to medium spider (up to the Portia′s weight[11]:428), including another Portia, the prey usually runs away for about 100 to 200 millimetres, enters convulsions, becomes paralysed after 10 to 30 seconds, and continues convulsing for 10 seconds to 4 minutes. Portia slowly approaches the prey and takes it.[11]:441–443 Portia usually needs to inflict up to 15 stabbings to completely immobilise a larger spider (1.5 to 2 times to the Portia′s weight[11]:428), and then Portia may wait about 20 to 200 millimetres away for 15 to 30 minutes from seizing the prey.[11]:441–443 Insects are usually not immobilised so quickly but continue to struggle, sometimes for several minutes.[11]:441–443

Occasionally a Portia is killed or injured while pursuing prey up to twice Portia′s size. In tests, Portia labiata is killed in 2.1% of pursuits and injured but not killed in 3.9%, while P. schultzi is killed in 1.7% and injured but not killed in 5.3%. In Queensland, P. fimbriata is killed in 0.06% of its pursuits and injured but not killed in another 0.06%. A Portia′s especially tough skin often prevents injury, even when its body is caught in the other spider's fangs. When injured, Portia bleeds and may sometimes lose one or more legs. Spiders' palps and legs break off easily when attacked, Portia′s palps and legs break off exceptionally easily, which may be a defence mechanism, and Portia species are often seen with missing legs or palps, while other salticids in the same habitat are not seen with missing legs or palps.[11]:450 A P. fimbriata specimen, now in the Australian Museum collection, regenerated a lost limb about 7 days after moulting.[2]

Hunting tactics of P. fimbriata

All performance statistics summarise result of tests in a laboratory, using captive specimens.[11]:429–430 Female P. fimbriatas' tactics and performance show regional differences between the populations in Queensland, the Northern Territory and Sri Lanka.[11]:424 The table also includes females of P. africana around Lake Victoria, of P. schultzi elsewhere in Kenya and of P. labiata in Sri Lanka for comparison.[11]:424, 432, 434

Regional differences in hunting tactics of females[11]:434, 437, 439
PreyPerformanceP. fimbriata
(Q)		P. fimbriata
(NT)		P. fimbriata
(SL)		P. africanaP. labiataP. schultzi
Salticid Tendency to pursue prey87%50%94%77%63%58%
Efficiency in capturing prey93%10%45%29%40%36%
Web-building
spider		 Tendency to pursue prey91%94%64%74%83%84%
Efficiency in capturing prey92%81%83%65%79%72%
Insect Tendency to pursue prey27%30%43%48%35%52%
Efficiency in capturing prey41%83%78%67%71%69%
Notes on this table:
  • "Tendency to pursue prey" is the percentage of tests in which the subject pursues the potential prey, and a pursuit starts when the Portia either approaches the prey or shakes the prey's web.[11]:428-429
  • "Efficiency in capturing prey" is the percentage of pursuits in which the subject captures the prey.[11]:428–429
  • "(Q)", "(NT)" and "(SL)" identify P. fimbriatas from Queensland, Northern Territory and Sri Lanka.[11]:425
  • The prey used were: unspecified jumping spiders; amaurobiid and theridiid web-based spiders; and houseflies.[11]:428

P. fimbriata in all regions fix their own webs to solid surfaces such as rocks and tree trunks and boughs, while some other Portia species often fix their webs to pliant stems and leaves and on the lower branches of trees.[11]:432

A test in 2001 showed that four jumping species take nectar, either by sucking free nectar from the surface of flowers or biting the flowers with their fangs. The spiders fed in cycles of two to four minutes, then groomed their bodies and especially their chelicerae, before another cycle. A more formal part of the test showed that 90 juvenile jumping spiders, including P. fimbriata, generally prefer to suck from blotting soaked with a 30% solution of sugar rather than paper soaked with distilled water. The authors suggest that, in the wild, nectar may be a frequent, convenient way to get some nutrients, as it would avoid the work, risks and costs (such as making venom) of predation. Jumping spiders may benefit from amino acids, lipids, vitamins and minerals normally found in nectar.[26]

Tactics in Queensland

Portia fimbriata from Queensland is the most thoroughly studied araneophagic (spider-eating) salticid.[27] Robinson (2010) said that the Queensland P. fimbriata has the most varied prey capture techniques of any animal in the world except humans and other simians.[2] When not using its own web, the Queensland P. fimbriata preys mainly on salticids of other genera, generally using against them a special tactic called "cryptic stalking".[27]

Differences in females' tactics between P. fimbriata (Queensland) and other Portia species[11]:434
 P. fimbriata (Q)Other Portia species
Light levels LowerHigher
Abundance of local web spiders HigherLower
Preying on web spiders More efficient
More likely to vibrate the web
Less likely to leap		 Less efficient
Less likely to vibrate the web
More likely to leap
Abundance of local salticids HigherLower
Preying on cursorial salticids More efficient
Uses cryptic stalking
Usually swoops[11]:440–441, 447		 Less efficient
No use of cryptic stalking
Never swoops[11]:440–441
Pursuing and catching insects Less efficientMore efficient
Slow, mechanical walking ExaggeratedLess pronounced
When mildly disturbed Adopts cryptic poseMakes wild leaps
While mating Courtship uses less vibrations
Female seldom twists to
lunge and eat the male		 Courtship uses more vibrations
Female twists and lunges
and often eats the male
Notes on this table:
  • In a swoop, P. fimbriata in Queensland slowly moves its cephalothorax above the prey, and then quickly drives down with its fangs open. This type of attack is not used by other Portia species, including P. fimbriata from Northern Territory and Sri Lanka.[11]:440–441
  • Other Portia species, including P. fimbriata outside Queensland, occasionally use isolated aspects of cryptic stalking, such as briefly keeping the palps down or being still for a moment when very close to prey.[11]:447

Adult males are less ready to pursue and less efficient at catching than adult females, especially against larger prey. Males are quite effective against small web spiders, and reluctant to tackle large ones although they catch them in about 50% of attempts. Against other jumping spiders, males do not pursue large ones and pursue about 48% of small ones, catching 84% of those they pursue.[11]:438 Males of Portia do not build large webs for catching prey ("capture webs").[11]:429

A test in 1997 showed that P. fimbriata′s preferences for different types of prey are in the order: web spiders; jumping spiders; and insects.[28]:337–339 These preferences apply to both live prey and motionless lures, and to P. fimbriata specimens without prey for 7 days ("well-fed"[28]:335) and without prey for 14 days ("starved"[28]:335). P. fimbriata specimens without prey for 21 days ("extra-starved") showed no preference for different types of prey.[28]:339 The test included as prey several species of web spiders and jumping spiders, and the selection of the prey species showed no evidence of affecting the results.[28]:337–339 Insects were represented by the house fly Musca domestica.[28]:335

Differences in females' pursuit times between P. fimbriata (Queensland) and other Portia species[11]:439–440, 449
Prey P. fimbriata (Q)Other Portia species
Salticid Median26 min3 min
Range1 to 318 min0 to 41 min
Web spider Median16 min5 min
Range0 to 583 min0 to 465 min
Insect Median3 min3 min
Range0 to 34 min0 to 45 min

When hunting most other salticids in Queensland, P. fimbriata exaggerates the slowness and "choppiness" of its normal gait (sometimes called "robotlike"[7]:6) and holds its palps retracted beside its fangs, as it also does in the cryptic rest pose. If the salticid prey faces P. fimbriata, P. fimbriata freezes until the prey turns away.[9][29]:750 This "cryptic stalking" appears unique to Queensland, where most other jumping spiders fail to recognize a disguised stalking P. fimbriata as a predator,[9] or even as an animal at all.[11]:447 P. fimbriata from Queensland uses cryptic stalking against both salticids native to Queensland and against imported salticids.[30]:445 Other salticids often defend themselves when stalked by other species of Portia or by P. fimbriata outside Queensland, and the Queensland P. fimbriata′s cryptic stalking may be a regional adaptation to the abundant but dangerous salticid prey, especially Jacksonoides queenslandicus, in the local rainforest.[9][29]:750–751 P. fimbriata uses cryptic stalking even against some oddly-shaped salticids such as the flattened Holoplatys and the elongated, mantis-like Mantisatta longicauda.[30]:455 All of P. fimbriata′s salticid prey have a pair of large, forward-facing principal eyes, a feature that arachnologists also use to distinguish salticids from all other spiders.[30]:455–456

Euryattus, another jumping spider from Queensland, has a partly overlapping range with P. fimbriata′s[10]:416–417 and is abundant in their common range, and adult and large juvenile P. fimbriatas hunt Euryattus adopting specific tactics. Unlike most jumping spiders, Euryattus makes a nest by suspending a dead rolled-up leaf by silk lines from vegetation. P. fimbriata catches Euryattus females by mimicking the vibrations made by Euryattus males as part of their courtship, and this deception lures Euryattus females out of their nests.[31] In tests, a Euryattus from P. fimbriata′s range recognises the predator and defends itself, while Euryattus specimens from outside P. fimbriata′s range seldom recognise the threat. P. fimbriata finds it easier to catch a Euryattus from outside the predator's home range than to capture the same species from P. fimbriata′s range.[10]:416–417 This may be an example of an evolutionary arms race.[32]

A female Lyssomanes viridis (not the species in Queensland)

P. fimbriata does not stalk at all species of the ant-mimic jumping spider genus Myrmarachne,[33]:449–450, 455 and uses cryptic stalking only about 20% of the time against other ant-mimicking salticids and against beetle-mimicking salticids.[30]:453 P. fimbriata also sometimes does not use cryptic stalking against females of the salticid subfamily Lyssomaninae. These females are unusually translucent, and the translucent cuticle makes the anterior-median eyes (front-and-center) show light and dark regions that flicker in and out when viewed head on. Lyssomanine males are not translucent and do not produce this flickering, and P. fimbriata uses cryptic stalking consistently against the males. This suggests that the flickering anterior-median eyes of lyssomanine females may reduce the ability of P. fimbriata to identify these females as jumping spiders.[9]

When encountering J. queenlandicus, P. fimbriata often first notices chemical cues on J. queenlandicus′ silken safety lines and then looks for its prey. The smell makes P. fimbriata to quicker to see the prey,[7]:6, 12 possibly by lowering thresholds in the visual system.[7]:36–37 Sometimes P. fimbriata cannot see J. queenlandicus through the prey's camouflage, and "hunts by speculation", jumping high in the air, so that J. queenlandicus betrays itself by turning and looking for the disturbance.[7]:6[29]:749 P. fimbriata then turns toward J. queenslandicus and waves its palps.[34]:1601 It appears that only P. fimbriatas from Queensland behaves this way while Portia species from other areas did not, that P. fimbriata from Queensland reacts this way only to J. queenslandicus, and that J. queenslandicus perceives no chemical warnings that P. fimbriata is around.[29]:749

When stalking any non-salticid, P. fimbriata does not use cryptic stalking and does not consistently pull its palps back nor consistently freeze when faced by the prey.[9] P. fimbriata adopts cryptic stalking only after recognizing prey as a jumping spider.[17]

In Queensland, P. fimbriata is reluctant to jump into the webs of prey spiders, while other Portia species do this at any opportunity.[23]:515 The Queensland orb web spider Argiope shakes its web violently to shake off intruders, and P. fimbriata finds a detour that allows it to abseil on to the prey.[10]:422 When the web spider Zosis genicularis is busy wrapping up its own prey and is less aware of other predators, P. fimbriata uses this activity as a type of smokescreen to approach the web spider.[35]:147

P. fimbriata uses non-cryptic stalking against lycosid, clubionid, theridiid and desid spiders, and against flies, but does not stalk beetles or ants.[30]:453

Unlike other Portia species, P. fimbriata in Queensland readily invades the nests of cursorial spiders, plucking or cutting the nest. If the resident spider eventually leaves the nest, P. fimbriata stalks it. If the resident spider tries to counterattack and then retreats into the nest, P. fimbriata may attack the other spider as it re-enters the nest, or may wait motionless until the prey exits. If a stabbed prey spider retreats into the nest, P. fimbriata in Queensland never enters the nest, but waits for the prey to move out, and then P. fimbriata kills it.[11]:444–447

The spiders were divided into those that:

  • Jump and then swim
    • Rewarded only
    • Penalised only
  • Swim only
    • Rewarded only
    • Penalised only

A test in a deliberately artificial environment explored the Queensland P. fimbriata′s ability to solve a novel problem by trial and error. A little island was set up in the middle of a miniature atoll, and the space between with them was filled with water. The gap was too wide for the spiders to jump all the way, and the spiders' options were to leap and then swim or to swim only. The testers encouraged some specimens by using a tiny scoop to make waves toward the atoll when the spiders chose the option the testers preferred (leap and then swim, or swim only), and discouraged some specimens by making waves back toward the island when the spiders chose the option the testers did not want – in other words, the testers "rewarded" one group for "successful" behaviour and "penalised" the other group for "unwanted" behaviour.[36]:284–286 The Queensland P. fimbriata specimens generally repeated successful behaviour and switched if the first try was unsuccessful, irrespective of which option (leap and then swim or to swim only) the testers chose as "good" for each specimen.[37]:1215

Tactics in Northern Territory

In the Northern Territory, P. fimbriata has no special tactics against other jumping spiders and tries to treat them as if they were web spiders, and then either tries to jump on them or gives up.[2] Hence this variant is poor at catching other jumping spiders. The Northern Territory variant of P. fimbriata is not as good as the Queensland one as catching web spiders, but better than the Sri Lanka variant and some other species of Portia. It is not enthusiastic about pursuing insects, but very good at catching those it pursues, as the performance table above shows[11]:424, 432, 434 While pursuits by the Queensland variant typically take 26 minutes, those of the Northern Territory variant typically take 3 to 5 minutes, like some other species of Portia.[11]:439–440, 449

Tactics in Sri Lanka

The Sri Lanka variant enthusiastically pursues other jumping spiders and is slightly better than most Portia species in tests, but about half as effective as the Queensland variant. In Sri Lanka, P. fimbriata is not a prolific hunter of web spiders or insects, but quite efficiently catches those it pursues.[11]:424, 432, 434 Like other Portia species, the Sri Lanka P. fimbriata typically take 3 to 5 minutes for a pursuit.[11]:439–440, 449

Reproduction and lifecycle
Male of P. fimbriata

Before courtship, a male Portia spins a small web between boughs or twigs, and he hangs under that and ejaculates on to it.[11]:467 He then takes up the semen into reservoirs in the palpal bulbs on his pedipalps.[8]:581–583

A laboratory test showed how males of P. fimbriata from Queensland minimise the risk of meeting each other, by recognising fresh pieces of blotting paper, some containing their own silk draglines and some containing another male's draglines. Males also were attracted by fresh blotting paper containing females' draglines, while females do not respond to fresh blotting paper containing males' draglines. This suggested that the males usually search for females, rather than vice versa. Neither sex responded to one week-old blotting paper, irrespective of whether it contained males' or females' draglines. A similar series of tests showed that P. labiata showed the same patterns of responses between the sexes.[38]

When meeting another of the same species, P. fimbriata does not stalk but displays by moving quickly and smoothly,[9] and displays at 4 to 27 centimetres away.[17] It raises its legs, its body sways from side to side, and the palps are lowered below the chelicerae ("fangs"). This is very different from the stalking it uses when encountering another salticid of a different species, despite receiving the same visual stimulus, the sight of the other's large anterior-median eyes. Although P. fimbriata is influenced by pheromones much more than is usual among salticids, visual cues alone are enough to start displays and distinguish members of the same species from other salticids, even if neither partner moves. The spindly, fringed legs of Portia species may identify members of the same species, as well as concealing these spiders from other salticid species.[9]

In P. fimbriata from Queensland and in some other species, contests between males usually last only 5 to 10 seconds, and only their legs make contact.[11]:466 Contests between Portia females are usually long and violent,[23]:518 and in P. fimbriata from Queensland these often including grappling that sometimes breaks a leg.[11]:466 A victor may evict a loser, and then eat the loser's eggs and take over the loser's web.[23]:518[11]:466 Unlike in some other Portia species, victorious females of P. fimbriata from Queensland do not kill and eat the losers.[11]:466

A female that sees a male may approach slowly or wait. The male then walks erect and displays by waving his legs and palps. If the female does not run away, she gives a "propulsive display"[c] first. If the male stands his ground and she does not run away or repeat the propulsive display, he approaches and, if she is mature, they copulate, the male inserting the tip of one of his palpal bulbs into the female's copulatory opening, using the first palp that made scraping contact.[11]:459–464 If the female is sub-adult (one moult from maturity), a male or sometimes a sub-adult male of P. fimbriata may cohabit in the female's capture web.[11]:467 Portia species usually mate on a web or on a dragline made by the female.[23]:518 P. fimbriata typically copulates for about 100 seconds, while other genera can take several minutes or even several hours.[23]:518[11]:465 Unlike in some other Portia species, females of P. fimbriata from Queensland do not eat their mates during courting, nor during [11]:464 or after copulation.[39]

When hunting, mature females of P. fimbriata, P. africana, P. labiata, and P. schultzi emit olfactory signals that reduce the risk that any other females, males or juveniles of the same species may contend for the same prey. The effect inhibits aggressive mimicry against a prey spider even if the prey spider is visible, and also if the prey is inhabiting any part of a web. If a female of one of these Portias smells a male of the same species, the female stimulates the males to court. These Portia species do not show this behaviour when they receive olfactory signals from members of other Portia species.[40]

In laboratory tests, Portia species including P. fimbriata mate with other species, but the females then produce no eggs.[11]:466

P. fimbriata in Queensland prefers to lay eggs on dead, brown leaves about 20 millimetres long, suspended near the top of its capture web, and then cover the eggs with a sheet of silk. If there is no dead leaf available, the female will make a small horizontal silk platform in the capture web, lay the eggs on it, and then cover the eggs. In Northern Territory, P. fimbriata occasionally lays eggs in a dead leaf, but more usually in a silk egg sac on a small horizontal web suspended on the main web.[11]:434–435, 469

Like all arthropods, spiders moult and, after hatching, the life stage before each moult is called an "instar".[41] Specimens of P. fimbriata become mature at instar 7, 8 or 9. In an experiment using P. fimbriata spiderlings from Queensland, 64% of those fed only on spiders survived to maturity, 37% of those fed on a mixture of spiders and insects survived, and all those fed solely on insects died before reaching the 6th instar.[42] For moulting, all Portia species spin a horizontal web whose diameter is about twice the spider's body length and is suspended only 1 to 4 millimetres below a leaf. The spider lies head down, and often slides down 20 to 30 millimetres during moulting.[23]:496 Portia species spin a similar temporary web for resting.[23]:513 P. fimbriata in Queensland can be very sedentary, in some cases remaining in the same web for over 48 days during a series of moults.[16]:239

Ecology

P. fimbriata is found in the rain forests of India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Hong Kong, Taiwan, New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Malaysia including Malacca, Indonesia, and in Australia's Northern Territory and Queensland.[5][11]:424[43]:302[3]:99–100 It lives on foliage, tree trunks, boulders, and rock walls.[6] Throughout its range, this is the most common species of the genus Portia.[44] Queensland specimens of P. fimbriata live near running water and where there is moderate light, while Northern Territory specimens live in caves where the light varies from rather dark at the back to much brighter around the mouths. Other populations of Portia also live with higher light levels than in Queensland, and some members of these other populations are found in webs exposed to direct sunlight for part of the day.[11]:431 In Queensland, P. fimbriata shares its environment with a common prey, the very abundant Jacksonoides queenslandicus,[9] and with large populations of other non-Portia salticids and non-salticid web-building spiders.[11]:432

Ants prey on P. fimbriata while P. fimbriata does not stalk ants, regarding them as poisonous or very unpleasant.[30]:454–455 P. fimbriata is also preyed upon by birds, frogs, and mantises.[4]

It is often difficult to find P. fimbriata in the wild, as its shape and movements are well disguised. The Queensland variety is quite easy to raise, while the Northern Territory variety is quite troublesome to maintain.[2]

Taxonomy

P. fimbriata is one of 17 species in the genus Portia as of May 2016.[45] Wanless divided the genus Portia into two species groups: the schultzi group, in which males' palps have a fixed tibial apophysis; and the kenti group, in which the apophysis of each palp in the males has a joint separated by a membrane.[3]:87–88 The schultzi group includes P. schultzi, P. africana, P. fimbriata, and P. labiata.[3]:93–94, 99–100, 102–105

The species P. fimbriata was originally described by Carl Ludwig Doleschall as Salticus fimbriata in 1859.[46] The species has also been named Attus fimbriatus (Doleschall, 1859), Sinis fimbriatus (Doleschall, 1859), Linus fimbriatus (Doleschall, 1859) and Boethoportia ocellata (Hogg, 1915), and Portia fimbriata (Doleschall, 1859),[1][5] and the last is now used.[1][4] According to Jackson and Hallas, P. fimbriata, as currently defined, probably includes two or more distinct species. In particular, Queensland P. fimbriata are probably a distinct species from Sri Lankan P. fimbriata, as matings between the two groups are infertile.[11]:480

Portia is in the subfamily Spartaeinae,[47] which is thought to be primitive.[23]:491 Molecular phylogeny, a technique that compares the DNA of organisms to reconstruct the tree of life, indicates that Portia is a member of the clade Spartaeinae, that Spartaeinae is basal (quite similar to the ancestors of all jumping spiders), and that Portia′s closest relatives are the genera Spartaeus, Phaeacius, and Holcolaetis.[48]:53

Notes

    a: ^ Jackson and Blest (1982) say, "The resolution of the receptor mosaic of Layer I in the central retina was estimated to be a visual angle of 2.4 arc min, corresponding to 0–12 mm at 20 cm in front of the spider, or 0–18 mm at 30 cm."[17]

    b: ^ Several species of cursorial spiders drink nectar as an occasional supplement their diet, and juveniles of some orb-web spiders digest pollen while re-cycling their webs.[49] One jumping spider (as of 2010), Bagheera kiplingi, is almost totally herbivorous.[50]

    c: ^ "Propulsive displays" are sudden, quick movements including striking, charging, ramming and leaps.[11]:455

    d: ^ The retina is at the end of a tube. The inner end of the tube moves from side to side in one to two cycles per second, and twists 50° in a cycle that takes 10 seconds.[51]:180–181

    References
    1. "Taxon details Portia fimbriata Doleschall, 1859". World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
    2. Robinson, Martyn (January 2010). "Raising Portia fimbriata" (PDF). Invertebrate Rearing. 1 (1): 5–9. ISSN 2042-633X. Retrieved 24 May 2011. Date from Invertebrate Rearing.
    3. Wanless, F. R. (1978). "A revision of the spider genus Portia (Araneae: Salticidae)" (PDF). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology. 34 (3). Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 August 2011. Retrieved 11 August 2011.
    4. Harland, D.P. & Jackson, R.R. (2000). ""Eight-legged cats" and how they see: a review of recent research on jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae)" (PDF). Cimbebasia. 16: 231–240. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-28. Retrieved 5 May 2011.
    5. Chang, Yung-Hau; I-Min Tso (2004). "Six newly recorded spiders of the genera Araneus, Larinia, Eriophora, Thanatus, Portia and Dolichognatha (Araneae: Araneidae, Philodromidae, Salticidae and Tetragnathidae) from Taiwan". Acta Arachnologica. 53 (1): 27–33. doi:10.2476/asjaa.53.27. Retrieved 4 May 2011.
    6. Piper, Ross (2007). "The Quest for Food: Portia spider" (PDF). Extraordinary Animals: An Encyclopedia of Curious and Unusual Animals. Westport, CT 06881: Greenwood Press. pp. 98–100. ISBN 978-0-313-33922-6. Retrieved 31 March 2011.CS1 maint: location (link)
    7. Harland, Duane P.; Robert R. Jackson (2004). "Portia Perceptions: The Umwelt of an Aranephagic Jumping Spider". In Frederick R. Prete (ed.). Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems. MIT Press. pp. 5–40. ISBN 978-0-262-66174-4. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
    8. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). "Chelicerata: Araneae". Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 571–584. ISBN 978-0-03-025982-1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
    9. Harland, D.P.; R.R. Jackson (November 2000). "Cues by which Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider, distinguishes jumping-spider prey from other prey". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 203 (22): 3485–3494. Retrieved 4 May 2011.
    10. Wilcox, R. Stimson; Robert R. Jackson (1998). "Cognitive Abilities of Araneophagic Jumping Spiders". In Russell P. Balda; Irene Maxine Pepperberg; Alan C. Kamil (eds.). Animal cognition in nature: the convergence of psychology and biology in laboratory and field. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-077030-4.
    11. Jackson, Robert R.; Susan E. A. Hallas (1986). "Comparative biology of jumping spiders Portia africana, P. albimana, P. fimbriata, P. labiata and P. schultzi, areanophagic, web-building jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) utilisation of webs, predatory versatility, and intraspecfic interactions". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 13 (4): 423–489. doi:10.1080/03014223.1986.10422978. ISSN 0301-4223. Retrieved 17 May 2011.
    12. Jarman, Elizabeth A.R.; Robert R. Jackson (1986). "The biology of Taieria erebus (Araneae, Gnaphosidae), an araneophagic spider from New New Zealand: silk utilisation and predatory versatility". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 13 (4): 521–540. doi:10.1080/03014223.1986.10422980. ISSN 0301-4223. Retrieved 1 April 2011.
    13. Hoefler, Chad D.; Andy Chen; Elizabeth M. Jakob (2006). "The Potential of a Jumping Spider, Phidippus clarus, as a Biocontrol Agent" (PDF). J. Econ. Entomol. 99 (2): 432–436. doi:10.1603/0022-0493-99.2.432. ISSN 0022-0493. PMID 16686143. Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 June 2010. Retrieved 25 April 2011.
    14. Forster, Lyndsay M. (1977). "A qualitative analysis of hunting behaviour in jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae)". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 4: 51–62. doi:10.1080/03014223.1977.9517936.
    15. Hill, David Edwin (October 2010). "Use of location (relative direction and distance) information by jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae, Phidippus) during movement toward prey and other sighted objectives" (PDF). Peckhamia. 83 (1): 1–103. ISSN 1944-8120. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
    16. Jackson, Robert R. (1986). "Web Building, Predatory Versatility, and the Evolution of the Salticidae". In William A. Shear (ed.). Spiders – webs, behavior, and evolution. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-1203-3. Retrieved 22 May 2011.
    17. Jackson, R.R.; A.D. Blest (1982). "The distances at which a primitive jumping spider, Portia fimbriata, makes visual discriminations" (PDF). Journal of Experimental Biology. 97 (1): 441–445. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
    18. Harland, Duane P.; Robert R. Jackson; Aynsley M. Macnab (March 1999). "Distances at which jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) distinguish between prey and conspecific rivals". Journal of Zoology. 247 (3): 357–364. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00998.x.
    19. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). "Arthropoda: Sense organs". Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 532–537. ISBN 978-0-03-025982-1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
    20. Wilcox, S. & Jackson, R. (2002). "Jumping Spider Tricksters" (PDF). In Bekoff, M.; Allen, C. & Burghardt, G.M. (eds.). The Cognitive Animal: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition. MIT Press. pp. 27–34. ISBN 978-0-262-52322-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-21. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
    21. Jackson, Robert R.; Simon D. Pollard (1997). "Jumping spiders mating strategies: sex among cannibals in and out of webs". In Jae C. Choe; Bernard J. Crespi (eds.). The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge University Press. pp. 340–351. ISBN 978-0-521-58976-5. Retrieved 6 June 2011.
    22. Richman, David B.; Robert R. Jackson (1992). "A review of the ethology of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae)" (PDF). Bulletin of the British Arachnology Society. 9 (2): 33–37. Retrieved 12 May 2011.
    23. Jackson, Robert R.; Susan E.A. Hallas (1986). "Predatory versatility and intraspecies interactions of spartaeine jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae): Brettus adonis, B. cingulata, Cyrba algerina, and Phaeacius sp. indet". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 13 (4): 491–520. doi:10.1080/03014223.1986.10422979. ISSN 0301-4223. Retrieved 1 April 2011.
    24. Jackson, R. R.; Jakob, E. M.; Willey, M. B.; Campbell, G. E. (February 1993). "Anti-predator defences of a web-building spider, Holocnemus pluchei (Araneae, Pholcidae)". Journal of Zoology. 229 (2): 347–352. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02641.x.
    25. Wilcox, R. Stimson; Robert R. Jackson; Kristen Gentile (1996). "Spiderweb smokescreens: spider trickster uses background noise to mask stalking movements" (PDF). Animal Behaviour. 51 (2): 313–326. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.583.2268. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0031. ISSN 0003-3472. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
    26. Jackson, Robert R.; Simon D. Pollard; Ximena J. Nelson; G. B. Edwards; Alberto T. Barrion (2001). "Jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) that feed on nectar" (PDF). Journal of Zoology. 255: 25–29. doi:10.1017/s095283690100108x. Retrieved 18 June 2011.
    27. Harland, Duane P.; Robert R. Jackson (2002). "Influence of cues from the anterior medial eyes of virtual prey on Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 205 (13): 1861–1868. Retrieved 22 May 2011.
    28. Li, Daiqin; Robert R. Jackson; Alberto Barrion (1997). "Prey preferences of Portia labiata, P. africana, and P. schultzi, araneophagic jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Kenya, and Uganda". New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 24 (4): 333–349. doi:10.1080/03014223.1997.9518129.
    29. Jackson, Robert R.; Robert J. Clark; Duane P. Harland (2002). "Behavioural and cognitive influences of kairomones on an araneophagic jumping spider" (PDF). Behaviour. 139 (6): 749–775. doi:10.1163/156853902320262808. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2011. Retrieved 17 May 2011.
    30. Harland, Duane P.; Robert R. Jackson (2001). "Prey classification by Portia fimbriata, a salticid spider that specializes at preying on other salticids: species that elicit cryptic stalking" (PDF). Journal of Zoology. 255 (4): 445–460. doi:10.1017/s0952836901001534. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2011. Retrieved 19 May 2011.
    31. Nelson, Ximena J.; Robert R. Jackson; Godfrey Sune (2005). "Use of Anopheles-specific prey-capture behavior by the small juveniles of Evarcha culicivora, a mosquito-eating jumping spider" (PDF). The Journal of Arachnology. 33 (2): 541–548. doi:10.1636/05-3.1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 August 2011. Retrieved 20 June 2011.
    32. Jackson, Robert R.; R. Stimson Wilcox (1990). "Aggressive mimicry, prey-specific predatory behaviour and predator-recognition in the predator-prey interactions of Portia fimbriata and Euryattus sp., jumping spiders from Queensland". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 26 (2): 111–119. doi:10.1007/BF00171580. - also at JSTOR
    33. Harland, Duane P.; Robert R. Jackson (2001). "Prey classification by Portia fimbriata, a salticid spider that specializes at preying on other salticids: species that elicit cryptic stalking" (PDF). Journal of Zoology. 255 (4): 445–460. doi:10.1017/s0952836901001534. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 September 2011. Retrieved 25 May 2011.
    34. Clark, Robert J.; Duane P. Harland; Robert J. Jackson (2000). "Speculative hunting by an araneophagic salticid spider". Behaviour. 137 (12): 1601–1612. doi:10.1163/156853900502736. JSTOR 4535796.
    35. Jackson, Robert R.; Simon D. Pollard; Ana M. Cerveira (2002). "Opportunistic use of cognitive smokescreens by araneophagic jumping spiders". Animal Cognition. 5 (3): 147–157. doi:10.1007/s10071-002-0144-9. ISSN 1435-9456.
    36. Jackson, Robert R.; Fiona R. Cross; Chris M. Carter (2006). "Geographic Variation in a Spider's Ability to Solve a Confinement Problem by Trial and Error". International Journal of Comparative Psychology. 19: 282–296. Retrieved 8 June 2011.
    37. Jackson, Robert R.; Chris M. Carter; Michael S. Tarsitano (2001). "Trial-and-error solving of a confinement problem by a jumping spider, Portia fimbriata". Behaviour. 138 (10): 1215–1234. doi:10.1163/15685390152822184. ISSN 0005-7959. JSTOR 4535886.
    38. Clark, R.J.; R.R. Jackson (1995). "Dragline-mediated sex recognition in two species of jumping spiders (Araneae Salticidae), Portia labiata and P. fimbriata". Ethology Ecology & Evolution. 7: 73–77. doi:10.1080/08927014.1995.9522970. Retrieved 13 June 2011.
    39. Jackson, Andrea. Phil Myers (ed.). "ADW: Portia fimbriata: Information". Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 13 May 2011.
    40. Willey, Marianne B.; Robert R. Jackson (1993). "Olfactory cues from conspecifics inhibit the web-invasion behavior of Portia, web-invading araneophagic jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae)". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 71 (7): 1415–1420. doi:10.1139/z93-195.
    41. Ruppert, E.E., Fox, R.S., and Barnes, R.D. (2004). "Arthropoda: Body wall". Invertebrate Zoology (7 ed.). Brooks / Cole. pp. 521–525. ISBN 978-0-03-025982-1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
    42. Li, Daiqin; Robert R. Jackson (1997). "Influence of diet on survivorship and growth in Portia fimbriata, an araneophagic jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae)". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 75 (10): 1652–1658. doi:10.1139/z97-792.
    43. Žabka, Marek M.; Wolfgang Nentwig (2000). "Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) of the Krakatau Islands (Indonesia): a preliminary approach" (PDF). Ekológia (Bratislava). 19 (suppl. 3): 293–306. Retrieved 25 May 2011.
    44. Logunov, Dmitry V.; Galina N. Azarkina (2007). "New species and new records for jumping spiders of the subfamily Spartaeinae (Aranei: Salticidae)" (PDF). Arthropoda Selecta. 16 (2): 97–114. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 August 2011. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
    45. "Gen. Portia Karsch, 1878". World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern. Retrieved 13 May 2016.
    46. Doleschall, C. Ludwig (1859). "Tweede Bijdrage tot de kennis der Arachniden van den Indischen Archipel". Acta Societatis Scientiarum Indo-Neêrlandicae. 5 (5): 1–60.
    47. Barrion, A.T.; J.A. Litsinger (1995). Riceland spiders of South and Southeast Asia. International Rice Research Institute / C.A.B. International. p. 45. ISBN 978-0-85198-967-9.
    48. Maddison, Wayne P.; Melissa R. Bodner; Karen M. Needham (2008). "Salticid spider phylogeny revisited, with the discovery of a large Australasian clade (Araneae: Salticidae)" (PDF). Zootaxa. 1893: 49–64. ISSN 1175-5334. Retrieved 14 June 2011.
    49. Chen, Xiaoqiong; Yuanchun Chen; Lingbing Wu; Yu Peng; Jian Chen; Fengxiang Liu (2010). "A survey of nectar feeding by spiders in three different habitats" (PDF). Bulletin of Insectology. 63 (2): 203–208. ISSN 1721-8861. Retrieved 20 May 2011.
    50. Meehan, Christopher J.; Eric J. Olson; Matthew W. Reudink; T. Kurt Kyser; Robert L. Curry (13 October 2009). "Herbivory in a spider through exploitation of an ant–plant mutualism". Current Biology. 19 (19): R892–R893. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.049. PMID 19825348.
    51. Land, Michael F.; Dan-Eric Nilsson (2006). "General-purpose and special-purpose visual systems" (PDF). In Eric Warrant; Dan-Eric Nilsson (eds.). Invertebrate vision. Cambridge University Press. pp. 167–210. ISBN 978-0-521-83088-1. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.