1937 Australian referendum (Marketing)

Constitution Alteration (Marketing) 1936 was an Australian referendum held in the 1937 referendums which sought to alter the Australian Constitution to remove the restraints on interstate sales of goods imposed on Parliament by section 92 of the Constitution.

It was proposed to add a section 92A that excluded "marketing" from the powers of section 92. This was in reaction to the case of James v Commonwealth [1932] AC 578 in which the Privy Council found that the Commonwealth legislation regulating the sales of dried fruit was invalid.[1]

Question

Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled 'Constitution Alteration (Marketing) 1936'?

Results

Result [2]
StateOn

rolls

Ballots issued For Against Invalid Result
% %
New South Wales1,550,947 1,461,860 456,80233.76 896,457 66.24108,601 No
Victoria1,128,492 1,074,278 468,33746.58 537,021 53.4268,920 No
Queensland562,240 519,933 187,68538.78 296,302 61.2235,946 No
South Australia358,069 341,444 65,36420.83 248,502 79.1727,578 No
Western Australia247,536 221,832 57,02327.77 148,308 72.2316,501 No
Tasmania133,444125,016 24,59721.88 87,798 78.1212,621 No
Total for Commonwealth3,980,728 3,744,363 1,259,80836.26 2,214,388 63.74270,167 No
Obtained majority in no State and an overall minority of 954,580 votes.
Not carried

Discussion

This was one of the few instances where a referendum failed to achieve a majority in any state.

See also

References

  1. Davern Wright, R J (1938). "THE DRIED FRUITS CASE. JAMES v. THE COMMONWEALTH" (PDF). Res Judicatae. 42: 173–176.
  2. Handbook of the 44th Parliament "Part 5 - Referendums and Plebiscites - Referendum results". Parliamentary Library of Australia. Archived from the original on 29 September 2017..

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.