Forced disappearance

A forced disappearance (or enforced disappearance) occurs when a person is secretly abducted or imprisoned by a state or political organization, or by a third party with the authorization, support, or acquiescence of a state or political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the person's fate and whereabouts, with the intent of placing the victim outside the protection of the law.[1]

Women of the Association of Families of the Detained-Disappeared demonstrate in front of La Moneda Palace during the Pinochet military regime.

According to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which came into force on 1 July 2002, when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed at any civilian population, a "forced disappearance" qualifies as a crime against humanity in international criminal law and, thus, is not subject to a statute of limitations. On 20 December 2006, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.

Often, forced disappearance implies murder. The victim in such a case is typically abducted, illegally detained and often tortured during interrogation, and ultimately killed, their body concealed after the fact by the individuals or organization responsible for their death. The party committing the murder has plausible deniability, as nobody can provide evidence of the victim's death. In enforced disappearance cases states are obliged under international human rights law to return the remains of the forcibly disappeared persons to their families.[2]

"Disappearing" political rivals is also a way for regimes to engender feelings of complicity in populations. The difficulty of publicly fighting a government that murders in secret can result in widespread pretense that everything is normal, as it did in the Dirty War in Argentina.

Human rights law

In international human rights law, disappearances at the hands of the state have been codified as "enforced" or "forced disappearances" since the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. For example, the practice is specifically addressed by the OAS's Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons. There is also some authority indicating that enforced disappearances occurring during armed conflict,[3] such as the Third Reich's Night and Fog program, may constitute war crimes.

In February 1980 the United Nations established the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, "the first United Nations human rights thematic mechanism to be established with a universal mandate". Its main task "is to assist families in determining the fate or whereabouts of their family members who are reportedly disappeared". In August 2014, the Working Group reported 43,250 unresolved cases of disappearances in 88 different States.[4]

The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 20 December 2006, also states that the widespread or systematic practice of enforced disappearances constitutes a crime against humanity. It gives victims' families the right to seek reparations, and to demand the truth about the disappearance of their loved ones. The Convention provides for the right not to be subjected to enforced disappearance, as well as the right for the relatives of the disappeared person to know the truth. The Convention contains several provisions concerning prevention, investigation and sanctioning of this crime, as well as the rights of victims and their relatives, and the wrongful removal of children born during their captivity. The Convention further sets forth the obligation of international co-operation, both in the suppression of the practice, and in dealing with humanitarian aspects related to the crime. The Convention establishes a Committee on Enforced Disappearances, which will be charged with important and innovative functions of monitoring and protection at international level. Currently, an international campaign of the International Coalition against Enforced Disappearances is working towards universal ratification of the convention.

Disappearances work on two levels: not only do they silence opponents and critics who have disappeared, but they also create uncertainty and fear in the wider community, silencing others who would oppose and criticise. Disappearances entail the violation of many fundamental human rights. For the disappeared person, these include the right to liberty, the right to personal security and humane treatment (including freedom from torture), the right to a fair trial, to legal counsel and to equal protection under the law, and the right of presumption of innocence among others. Their families, who often spend the rest of their lives searching for information on the disappeared, are also victims.

International criminal law

According to the Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court enforced disappearances constitute crime against humanity, when committed as a part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with the knowledge of the attack. The Rome Statute defines enforced disappearances differently than international human rights law, namely as "the arrest, detention or abduction of persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time" (Article 7.2(i)).

General background

The evocation of the crime of forced disappearance begins with the history of the rights in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, formulated on 26 August 1789 in France by the authorities that came out of the French Revolution, where it was already stated in Articles 7 and 12:

art. 7. No person may be charged, detained or imprisoned except in cases determined by law and in the manner prescribed therein. Those requesting, facilitating, executing or executing arbitrary orders must be punished ... art. 12. The guarantee of the rights of man and of the citizen needs a public force. This force is therefore instituted for the benefit of all, and not for the particular utility of those who are in charge of it.

Throughout the nineteenth century, along with the technological advancement applied to the wars that led to increased mortality among combatants and damage to civilian populations during conflicts, movements for humanitarian awareness in Western societies resulted in the founding of the first humanitarian organizations such as the Red Cross in 1859 and the first international typifications of abuses and crimes[5] or laws of war known as Geneva Conventions from 1864. After the Second World War, in 1946 the Nuremberg trials brought to the public attention the breadth of the Nacht und Nebel decree, one of the most prominent antecedents of the crime, by 20 of which the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler stopped and condemned death to persons in the occupied territories of Europe considered a threat to the security of the Third Reich. However, the executions were not carried out immediately, once the people were deported to Germany and imprisoned at locations such as Natzweiler-Struthof concentration camp, where they ended up disappearing, and no information about their whereabouts and fate was notified as per point III of decree:

III. ... In case German or foreign authorities inquire about such prisoners, they are to be told that they were arrested, but that the proceedings do not allow any further information.[6]

German Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel was the person condemned in connection with his role in the application of the "NN decree" by Adolf Hitler, although, as at that time it had not yet been accepted that enforced disappearances were part of the concept of crimes against humanity, the International Criminal Tribunal in Nuremberg found him guilty of war crimes.[7]

Since 1974, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the United Nations Commission on Human Rights have been the first international human rights bodies to react to the phenomenon of disappearances, following complaints made in connection with cases Chile since the military coup of 11 September 1973.[8] The report of the Working Group to Investigate the Situation of Human Rights in that country, which was submitted to the United Nations Commission on 4 February 1976, illustrated for the first time such a case, the one of Alphonse-René Chanfreau, of French origin, arrested in July 1974 at his home in Santiago de Chile.

Earlier, in February 1975, the UN Commission on Human Rights had for the first time used the term persons unaccounted for, "persons whose disappearance was not justified", in a resolution that dealt with disappearances in Cyprus as a result of the armed conflict that resulted in the division of the island,[9] an expression taken together with that of missing people, in the two General Assembly resolutions adopted in December 1975 with respect to Cyprus and Chile.[10]

1977 and 1979 resolutions

In 1977, the General Assembly of the United Nations again manifested itself in relation to disappearances in its resolution 32/118.[11] By then, the Nobel Prize winner Adolfo Pérez Esquivel had made an international appeal that with the support of the French government[12] which obtained the response of the General Assembly in the form of resolution 33/173 of 20 December 1978, which specifically referred to "missing persons" and requested the Commission on Human Rights to make appropriate recommendations.

On 6 March 1979, the Commission authorized the appointment as experts of Dr. Felix Ermacora and Waleed M. Sadi, who later resigned due to political pressure,[13] to study the question of the fate of disappearances in Chile, issuing a report to the General Assembly on 21 November 1979. Felix Ermacora's report became a reference point on the legal issue of crime by including a series of conclusions and recommendations which were later collected by international organizations and bodies.[14]

Meanwhile, during the same year, the General Assembly of the Organization of American States adopted a resolution on Chile on 31 October, in which it declared that the practice of disappearances was "an affront to the conscience of the hemisphere",[15] after having sent in September a mission of the Inter-American Commission to Argentina, which confirmed the systematic practice of enforced disappearances by successive military juntas. In spite of the exhortations of non-governmental organizations and family organizations of the victims, in the same resolution of 31 October 1979, the General Assembly of the OAS issued a statement, after receiving pressure from the Argentine government, in which only the states in which persons had disappeared were urged to refrain from enacting or enforcing laws that might hinder the investigation of such disappearances.[16]

Shortly after the report by Félix Ermacora, the UN Commission on Human Rights considered one of the proposals made and decided on 29 February 1980 to set up the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, the first of the so-called thematic mechanisms of the commission and the most important body of the United Nations that has since been dealing with the problem of disappearances in cases that can be attributed to governments, as well as issuing recommendations to the commission and governments on the improvement of the protection afforded to missing persons and their families and to prevent cases of enforced disappearance. Since then, different causes began to be developed in various international legal bodies, whose sentences served to establish a specific jurisprudence on enforced disappearance.

1983 OAS resolution and first convictions

The United Nations Human Rights Committee, established in 1977 in accordance with article 28 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to monitor compliance by states parties with their obligations, issued in March 1982 and July 1983, two sentences condemning the State of Uruguay for the cases of Eduardo Bleier,[17] a former member of the Communist Party of Uruguay, residing in Hungary and Israel, disappeared after his arrest in 1975 in Montevideo, and Elena Quinteros Almeida, missing since her arrest at the Venezuelan Embassy in Montevideo in June 1976, in an incident that led to the suspension of diplomatic relations between the two countries. In its judgments, the Committee relied on a number of articles of the International Covenant, in particular those relating to "the right to liberty and personal security", "the right of detainees to be treated humanely and with respect to the inherent dignity of the human being" and "the right of every human being to the recognition of his juridical personality", while in the case of Quinteros, it was solved for the first time in favor of the relatives considered equally victims.

In 1983, the Organization of American States (OAS) declared by its resolution 666 XIII-0/83 that any enforced disappearance should be described as a crime against humanity. A few years later, in 1988 and 1989, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights pronounced the first convictions that declared the State of Honduras guilty for violating its duty to respect and guarantee the rights to life, liberty and personal integrity of the disappeared Angel Manfredo Velásquez Rodríguez, a Honduran student kidnapped in September 1981 in Tegucigalpa by heavily armed civilians connected with the Honduran Armed Forces and Saúl Godínez Cruz,[18] but for which, since the express definition of the crime of enforced disappearance had not yet been defined, it had to rely on different articles of the American Convention on Human Rights of 1969. Other rulings issued by the Inter-American Court that established jurisprudence condemned Colombia,[19] Guatemala for several cases including the call of the "street children",[20] Peru,[21] and Bolivia.[22]

Situation in Europe and resolutions of 1993 and 1995

In Europe, the European Court of Human Rights, established in 1959, in accordance with article 38 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, became a single permanent and binding court For all the Member States of the Council of Europe. Although the European Convention does not contain any express prohibition of the practice of enforced disappearance, the Court dealt with several cases of disappearance in 1993 in the context of the conflict between the Turkish security forces and members or supporters of the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) from the Kurdish region to the southeast of Turkey.[23]

Another body providing the basis for the legal definition of the crime of enforced disappearance was the Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina, a human rights tribunal established under Annex 6 of the Dayton Peace Agreement of 14 December 1995 which, although it was declared incompetent by ratione temporis to deal with the majority of the 20,000 cases reported, it issued a number of sentences against the Serbian Republic of Bosnia[24] and the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina,[25] which compensated several families of disappeared persons.

Towards the 1992 International Convention

In parallel with the resolutions of the international organizations, several non-governmental organizations drafted projects for an international convention. In 1981, the Institut des droits de l'homme du Barreau de Paris (Institute of Human Rights of the Paris Law School) organized a high-level symposium to promote an international convention on disappearances, followed by several draft declarations and conventions proposed by the Argentine League for Human Rights, FEDEFAM at the annual congress of Peru in 1982 or the Colectivo de Abogados José Alvear Restepo from Bogotá in 1988.

In that same year, the French expert in the then Subcommission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Louis Joinet, prepared the draft text to be adopted in 1992 by the General Assembly with the title Declaration on the Protection of All Persons Against enforced disappearances. The definition presented was based on the one traditionally used by the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances. Although the Declaration included as the primary obligation of States to enact specific criminal legislation, unlike the Convention against Torture, the principle of universal jurisdiction was not established nor was it agreed that the provisions of the Declaration and the recommendations of the Working Group were legally binding, so that only a few states took concrete steps to comply with them.[26]

The United Nations Declaration, despite its shortcomings, served to awaken the regional project for the American continent commissioned by the OAS General Assembly in 1987, which, although drafted by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in 1988, it was subjected to lengthy discussions and modifications that resulted in their stagnation. In June 1994, the OAS General Assembly finally approved the Inter-American Convention on the Forced Disappearance of Persons, which would be the first legally binding instrument on the subject, and entered into force on 28 March 1996,[27] after its ratification by eight countries: Argentina, Panama, Uruguay, Costa Rica, Paraguay, Venezuela, Bolivia and Guatemala.

In view of the meager success of the United Nations Declaration, a non-binding instrument that could only marginally influence the practice of enforced disappearances, a number of non-governmental organizations and several experts proposed strengthening protection against disappearances, adopting a convention within the framework of the United Nations. This was followed by the deliberations of the 1981 Paris Colloquium submitted by Louis Joinet in the form of a draft subcommittee in August 1988. Several governments, international organizations and non-governmental organizations responded to the invitation of Secretary-General Kofi Annan to provide comments and observations to the project.[28]

The 2006 International Convention

On 20 December 2006, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the text of the International Convention on the Forced Disappearance of Persons after more than 25 years of development and was signed in Paris on 6 February 2007[29] at a ceremony to which representatives of the 53 first signatory countries attended and in which 20 of them immediately ratified it. On 19 April 2007, the Commission on Human Rights updated the list of countries that ratified the convention, which included 59 nations.

Report of the UN (1980–2009)

Since the establishment of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights (CHR) in 1980, the crime of enforced disappearance has proved to be a global problem, affecting many countries on five continents, and it is the subject of a special follow-up by the HRC which regularly publishes reports on its complaint and situation, as well as the response and action of the governments concerned.[30]

The report of the 2009 Working Group recorded a total of 53,232 cases transmitted by the Working Group to Governments since their inception in 1980 and affecting 82 states. The number of cases that are still under study due to lack of clarification, closed or discontinuous cases amounts to 42,600. Since 2004 the Working Group had clarified 1,776 cases. In the previous report of 2007, the number of cases had been 51,531 and affected 79 countries.[31] Many of the countries in the cases are affected internally by violent conflicts, while in other countries the practice of repressive policies towards political opponents is denounced. In other countries, generally in the western and European hemispheres, there are still historical cases that remain unresolved and constitute permanent crimes.

In the official UN report of 2009, of the 82 countries where the cases of missing persons were identified, the largest number (more than 1000) transmitted were:[32] Iraq (16,544), Sri Lanka (12,226), Argentina (3,449), Guatemala (3,155), Peru (3,009), Algeria (2,939), El Salvador (2,661) and Colombia (1,235). Other countries with numerous cases under denunciation (between 1000 and 100) are: Chile (907), China (116), Congo (114), Ethiopia (119), Philippines (780), Honduras (207), India (430), Indonesia (165), Iran (532), Lebanon (320), Morocco (268), Mexico (392), Nepal (672), Nicaragua (234), Russian Federation (478), Sudan, Yemen (155) and East Timor (504).

Examples

NGOs such as Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch record in their annual report the number of known cases of forced disappearance.

Algeria

During the Algerian Civil War, which began in 1992 as Islamist guerrillas attacked the military government which had annulled an Islamist electoral victory, thousands of people were forcibly disappeared. Disappearances continued up to the late 1990s, but thereafter dropped off sharply with the decline in violence in 1997. Some of the disappeared were kidnapped or killed by the guerrillas, but others are presumed to have been taken by state security services. This latter group has become the most controversial. Their exact numbers remain disputed, but the government has acknowledged a figure of just over 6,000 disappeared, now presumed dead. Opposition sources claim the real number is closer to 17,000.[33] (The war claimed a total toll of 150–200,000 deaths).

In 2005 a controversial amnesty law was approved in a referendum. It granted financial compensation to families of the "disappeared", but also effectively ended the police investigations into the crimes.[34]

Argentina

Flag with images of those who disappeared during a demonstration in Buenos Aires to commemorate the 35th anniversary of the 1976 coup in Argentina.

During Argentina's Dirty War and Operation Condor, many alleged political dissidents were abducted or illegally detained and kept in clandestine detention centers such as ESMA, where they were questioned, tortured, and sometimes killed. Other detention camps include those of Garaje Azopardo and Orletti, to name just a few. These places of torture, located in Buenos Aires, Argentina, contributed over 6,000 desaparecidos, or disappeared persons, to the overall count in the Dirty War. The victims would be shipped to places like a garage or basement and tortured day after day.[35] The disappeared ones were people who were considered to be a political or ideological threat to the military junta.[36] The Argentine military justified torture to obtain intelligence and saw the disappearances as a way to curb political dissidence.[36] Whenever the female captives were pregnant, their children were stolen away right after giving birth, while they themselves remained detained. It is estimated that 500 young children and infants were given to families with close ties to the military to be raised.[37]

Eventually, many of the captives were heavily drugged and loaded onto aircraft, from which they were thrown alive while in flight over the Atlantic Ocean in the so-called "death flights" or (vuelos de la muerte), so as to leave no trace of their death.[38] Without any dead bodies, the government could easily deny any knowledge of their whereabouts and any accusations that they had been killed. In addition, the forced disappearances was the military junta's attempt to silence the opposition and break the determination of the guerrillas.[36] People murdered in this way (and in others) are today referred to as "the disappeared" (los desaparecidos).[39]

An activist group, Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, was formed by mothers of the "disappeared" victims of the dictatorship. In addition a similar group was formed, Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo, with the goal of finding the children stolen by the Argentine government during the Dirty War.[40] Some 500 children are estimated to be stolen and 120 cases have been confirmed by DNA tests.[41]

The phrase was recognized by de facto President General Jorge Rafael Videla when he said in a press conference "They are neither dead nor alive, they are desaparecidos (missing)". It is thought that between 1976 and 1983 in Argentina, up to 30,000 people (8,960 named cases, according to the official report by the CONADEP)[42] were killed or disappeared. According to a declassified cable, an estimate by the Argentine 601st Intelligence Battalion in mid-July 1978 (which started counting victims in 1975) produced a figure of 22,000 persons killed or "disappeared"—this document was first published by John Dinges in 2004.[43]

Bangladesh

Since 2010, under the Awami League regime, at least 500 people – most of whom are opposition leaders and activists – have been enforcedly disappeared in Bangladesh by the state security forces.[44][45][46] According to the report of a domestic human rights organization, 82 people were enforcedly disappeared from January to September 2014.[47] After the disappearances, at least 39 of the victims were found dead while others remained missing.[46] On 25 June 2010, an opposition leader Chowdhury Alam was arrested by the state police and remained missing since then.[48] His abduction was later denied by the law enforcing agencies.[49] On 17 April 2012, another prominent leader, Ilyas Ali, of the main opposition party Bangladesh Nationalist Party was enforcedly disappeared by the unknown armed personnel. The incident got much media coverage. Before the controversial national election of 2014, at least 19 opposition men were picked up by security forces.[50] The incidents of enforced disappearances were condemned by both domestic and international human rights organizations. Despite the demands for the govt. initiatives to probe such disappearances, investigations into such cases were absent.[50][51][52]

Belarus

Demonstration in Warsaw, reminding about the disappearances of oppositionals in Belarus

In 1999 opposition leaders Yury Zacharanka and Viktar Hanchar together with his business associate Anatol Krasouski disappeared. Hanchar and Krasouski disappeared the same day of a broadcast on state television in which President Alexander Lukashenko ordered the chiefs of his security services to crack down on "opposition scum." Although the State Security Committee of the Republic of Belarus (KGB) had them under constant surveillance, the official investigation announced that the case could not be solved. The investigation of the disappearance of journalist Dzmitry Zavadski in 2000 has also yielded no results. Copies of a report by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, which linked senior Belarusian officials to the cases of disappearances, were confiscated.[53]

In December 2019, Deutsche Welle published a documentary film in which Yury Garavski, a former member of a special unit of the Belarusian Ministry of Internal Affairs, confirmed that it was his unit which had arrested, taken away and murdered Zecharanka and that they later did the same with Viktar Hanchar and Anatol Krassouski.[54]

Bosnia and Herzegovina

The President of Bosnia and Herzegovina on 8 April 1994, Alija Izetbegović, signed an act that allowed the army and the intelligence services to carry out forced disappearances to spread terror and demoralize Serb fighters in the War of Bosnia. In response to this act, the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina created the 125th Battalion that, along with the ICSR (Informativni Centar za Spas Republike, the former intelligence service of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina), was responsible for the kidnap, torture and disappearance through death flights of captured Serb fighters in the war. Mostar Airport was used, during the war, to detain disappeared people. In 2015, Amnesty International asked of "authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina to truly commit to resolving the over 8,000 outstanding cases of enforced disappearances from the war."[55]

Chile

He shut down parliament, suffocated political life, banned trade unions, and made Chile his sultanate. His government disappeared 3,000 opponents, arrested 30,000 (torturing thousands of them) ... Pinochet's name will forever be linked to the Desaparecidos, the Caravan of Death, and the institutionalized torture that took place in the Villa Grimaldi complex.

Almost immediately after the military's seizure of power on 11 September 1973, the Chilean military junta banned all the leftist parties that had constituted the democratically elected president Salvador Allende's UP coalition.[57] All other parties were placed in "indefinite recess", and were later banned outright. The regime's violence was directed not only against dissidents, but also against their families and other civilians.[57] [See: Missing (1982)]

The Rettig Report concluded 2,279 persons who disappeared during the military dictatorship were killed for political reasons or as a result of political violence, and approximately 31,947 tortured according to the later Valech Report, while 1,312 were exiled. The latter were chased all over the world by the intelligence agencies. In Latin America, this was made under the auspices of Operation Condor, a combined operation between the intelligence agencies of various South American countries, assisted by a United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) communication base in Panama. Pinochet justified these operations as being necessary in order to save the country from communism.[58]

Some political scientists have ascribed the relative bloodiness of the coup to the stability of the existing democratic system, which required extreme action to overturn. Some of the most famous cases of human rights violations occurred during the early period: in October 1973, at least 70 people were killed throughout the country by the Caravan of Death. Charles Horman, a US journalist, "disappeared", as did Víctor Olea Alegría, a member of the Socialist Party, and many others, in 1973. Mathematician Boris Weisfeiler is thought to have disappeared near Colonia Dignidad, a German colony founded by anti-Communist Paul Schäfer in Chile, which was used as a detention center by the DINA, the secret police.[59]

Disappeared people in art at Parque por la Paz at Villa Grimaldi in Santiago de Chile

Furthermore, many other important officials of Allende's government were tracked down by the Dirección de Inteligencia Nacional (DINA—the Chilean secret police) during Operation Condor. Thus, General Carlos Prats, Pinochet's predecessor and army commander under Allende, who had resigned rather than support the moves against Allende's government, was assassinated by a car bomb in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1974. A year later, the deaths of 119 opponents abroad was claimed as the product of infighting between Marxist factions, the DINA setting up a disinformation campaign to propagate this thesis, Operation Colombo. The campaign was legitimized and supported by the leading newspaper in Chile, El Mercurio.

Other victims of Condor included, among hundreds of less famous persons, Juan José Torres, the former President of Bolivia, assassinated in Buenos Aires on 2 June 1976; Carmelo Soria, a UN diplomat working for the CEPAL, assassinated in July 1976; and Orlando Letelier, a former Chilean ambassador to the United States and minister in Allende's cabinet, assassinated after his release from internment and exile in Washington, D.C. by a car bomb on 21 September 1976. This led to strained relations with the US and to the extradition of Michael Townley, a US citizen who worked for the DINA and had organized Letelier's assassination. Other targeted victims, who escaped assassination, included Christian-Democrat politician Bernardo Leighton, who barely escaped an assassination attempt in Rome in 1975 by the Italian neo-fascist terrorist Stefano delle Chiaie (the assassination attempt seriously injured Leighton and his wife, Anita Fresno, leaving her permanently disabled); Carlos Altamirano, the leader of the Chilean Socialist Party, targeted for murder in 1975 by Pinochet, along with Volodia Teitelboim, writer and member of the Communist Party; Pascal Allende, the nephew of Salvador Allende and president of the MIR, who escaped an assassination attempt in Costa Rica in March 1976; and US Congressman Edward Koch, who became aware in 2001 of the relationship between death threats he received and his denunciation of Operation Condor. Furthermore, according to current investigations, Eduardo Frei Montalva, the Christian Democrat President of Chile from 1964 to 1970, may have been poisoned in 1982 by a toxin produced by DINA biochemist Eugenio Berrios.[60] Berríos himself is reputed to having been assassinated by Chilean intelligence in Uruguay, after being spirited away to said country in the early 1990s.

The disappeared students and professors; School of Law of the University of Chile.

Protests continued, however, during the 1980s, leading to several scandals. In March 1985, the gruesome murder of three Communist Party of Chile (PCC) members led to the resignation of César Mendoza, head of the Chilean gendarmerie the Carabineros de Chile and member of the junta since its formation. During a 1986 protest against Pinochet, 21-year-old American photographer Rodrigo Rojas DeNegri and 18-year-old student Carmen Gloria Quintana were burnt alive, killing Rojas.

In August 1989, Marcelo Barrios Andres, a 21-year-old member of the Manuel Rodríguez Patriotic Front (FPMR, the armed wing of the PCC, created in 1983, which had attempted to assassinate Pinochet on 7 September 1986), was assassinated by a group of military personnel who were supposed to arrest him on orders of Valparaíso's public prosecutor. However, they simply summarily executed him; this case was included in the Rettig Report.[61] Among the killed and disappeared during the military dictatorship were 440 MIR guerrillas.[62]

China

Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, along with his family, was taken into custody by the Chinese government shortly after being identified as the 11th Panchen Lama by the 14th (and current) Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso.[63][64][65] In his place, the Chinese government appointed Gyaincain Norbu to act as the Panchen Lama, though Norbu is not recognized as the Panchen Lama in Tibet or elsewhere (beyond China).[66][67] Nyima has not been seen in public since he was taken into custody, though the Chinese government claims that he is alive and well, but that he "does not wish to be disturbed."[68]

Hong Kong

Lee Bo (李波) was a dual citizen of Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. On 30 December 2015 evening, Lee disappeared. His wife shortly received a phone call from him (with caller ID from Shenzhen) in which he explained in Mandarin (not Cantonese in which they would usually converse) he had to assist with some investigation for a while, and he could not be home nor provide more information for a while.

Lee was a co-owner of the Causeway Bay Books and the Might Current publishing house that specialized in selling books concerning the political gossip and other lurid subjects of the Chinese Communist party leaders. These books were banned from China, but were popular among the tourists visiting Hong Kong. Towards the end of October 2015, four co-owners and managers of the bookstore and publisher, Gui Minhai, Lui Bo (呂波), Cheung Jiping (張志平), and Lam Wing-kei, went missing from Thailand and mainland China, believed to be detained by the Central Case Examination Group. Lee had expressed concern of his safety in various interviews after his colleagues disappeared, and intentionally left all travel documents at home (confirmed by his wife after his disappearance).

Lee's disappearance drew wide attention. The disappearance of all 5 men were speculated to be connected to some upcoming news releases that would have embarrassed the Communist party. Hong Kong citizens, under one-country two-systems, are supposedly to be protected by the Basic Law in that PRC law enforcement cannot operate in the special administrative region (SAR). Most laws in China do not apply. Lee's disappearance was considered a threat to Article 27 and most importantly the many rights, freedom, and protection promised to Hong Kong citizens often denied in mainland China.[69][70][71]

Colombia

In 2009, Colombian prosecutors reported that an estimated 28,000 people have disappeared due to paramilitary and guerrilla groups during the nation's ongoing internal conflict. In 2008, the corpses of 300 victims were identified and 600 more during the following year. According to Colombian officials, it will take many years before all the bodies that have been recovered are identified.[72]

Egypt

Enforced disappearance have been employed by the Egyptian authorities under the regime of Abdel Fattah el-Sisi as a key instrument to terrify, interrogate and torture El-Sisi opponents, while using counter-terrorism as an excuse.[73] Hundreds of people forcibly disappeared including political activists, protesters, women and children. Around three to four people are seized per day by the heavily armed security forces led by NSA officers who usually storm their homes, detain many of them, blindfold and handcuff them for months.[73][74]

378 individuals have forcibly disappeared between 1 August 2016 and mid-August 2017. 291 people have been located, while the rest are still forcibly disappeared. Of the 52 children disappeared in 2017, three were extrajudicially killed.[75]

El Salvador

According to the United Nations Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances, enforced disappearances were systematically carried out in El Salvador both prior to (starting in 1978) and during the Salvadoran Civil War. Salvadoran non-governmental organizations estimate that more than 8,000 disappearances occurred, and in the Report of the Commission on the Truth for El Salvador, it is estimated that more than 5,500 persons may have been the victims of enforced disappearance. The Office of the Procurator for the Protection of Human Rights of El Salvador claims that

Disappearances usually took place during operations whose purpose was the detention and later the disappearance or execution of persons identified as or suspected of being government opponents, including civilians who had nothing to do with the conflict, with the apparent aim of generating terror and eliminating members of the population who might potentially become guerrillas.

Enforced disappearances of children occurred, which is thought to have been "part of a deliberate strategy within the violence institutionalized by the State during the period of conflict".[76]

Equatorial Guinea

According to the UN Human Rights Council Mission to Equatorial Guinea,[77] agents of the Equatorial Guinean Government have been responsible for abducting refugees from other countries in the region, and holding them in secret detention. For example, in January 2010[78] four men were abducted from Benin by Equatorial Guinean security forces, held in secret detention, subjected to torture, and executed in August 2010 immediately after being convicted by a military court.

Germany

During World War II, Nazi Germany set up secret police forces, including branches of the Gestapo in occupied countries, which they used to hunt down known or suspected dissidents or partisans. This tactic was given the name Nacht und Nebel (Night and Fog), to describe those who disappeared after being arrested by Nazi forces without any warning. The Nazis also applied this policy against political opponents within Germany. Most victims were killed on the spot, or sent to concentration camps, with the full expectation that they would then be killed.

Guatemala

Guatemala was one of the first countries where people were disappeared as a generalized practice of terror against a civilian population. Forced disappearances was widely practiced by the United States-backed military government of Guatemala during the 36-year Guatemalan Civil War.[79] An estimated 40,000 to 50,000 individuals were disappeared by the Guatemalan military and security forces between 1954 and 1996. The tactic of disappearance first saw widespread use in Guatemala during the mid-1960s, as government repression became widespread when the military adopted harsher counterinsurgency measures. The first documented case of forced disappearance by the government in Guatemala occurred in March 1966, when thirty Guatemalan Party of Labour associates were kidnapped, tortured and killed by the security forces; their bodies were put in sacks and dumped at sea from helicopters. This was one of the first major instances of forced disappearance in Latin American history.[80] When law students at the University of San Carlos used legal measures (such as habeas corpus petitions) to require the government to present the detainees at court, some of the students were "disappeared" in turn.[81]

India

Ensaaf, a nonprofit organization working to end impunity and achieve justice for mass state crimes in India, with a focus on Punjab,[82] released a report in January 2009, in collaboration with the Benetech Human Rights Data Analysis Group (HRDAG), claiming "verifiable quantitative" findings on mass disappearances and extrajudicial executions in the Indian state of Punjab.[83] It claims that in conflict-afflicted states like Punjab, Indian security forces have perpetrated gross human rights violations with impunity. The report by Ensaaf and HRDAG, "Violent Deaths and Enforced Disappearances During the Counterinsurgency in Punjab, India", presents empirical findings suggesting that the intensification of counterinsurgency operations in Punjab in the 1980s to 1990s was accompanied by a shift in state violence from targeted lethal human rights violations to systematic enforced disappearances and extrajudicial executions, accompanied by mass "illegal cremations".[83] Furthermore, there is key evidence suggesting security forces tortured, executed, and disappeared tens of thousands of people in Punjab from 1984 to 1995.[83]

In 2011, the Jammu and Kashmir State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) recommended the identification of 2,156 people buried in unmarked graves in north Kashmir.[84] The graves were found in dozens of villages on the Indian side of the Line of Control, the border that has divided India and Pakistan since 1972.[85] According to a report published by the commission, many of the bodies were likely to be those of civilians who disappeared more than a decade earlier in a brutal insurgency. "There is every probability that these unidentified dead bodies buried in various unmarked graves at 38 places of North Kashmir may contain the dead bodies of enforced disappearances", the report stated.[86]

Iraq

At least tens of thousands of people disappeared under the regime of Saddam Hussein, many of them during Operation Anfal.

On 15 December 2019, two Iraqi activists and friends – Salman Khairallah Salman and Omar al-Amri – disappeared amidst ongoing protests in Baghdad. The family and friends of the two fear the disappearance of more people following United Nations' warning to security forces and other unnamed militia groups, of carrying out a campaign of kidnapping and 'deliberate killings' in Iraq.[87]

Iran

Following the Iran student riots in 1999, more than 70 students disappeared. In addition to an estimated 1,200–1,400 detained, the "whereabouts and condition" of five students named by Human Rights Watch remained unknown.[88] The United Nations has also reported other disappearances.[89] After each manifestation, from teacher unions to women's rights activists, at least some disappearances are expected.[90][91] Dissident writers have been the target of disappearances,[92] as have members of religious minorities such as the Baháʼí Faith following the Iranian Revolution. Examples include Muhammad Movahhed and Ali Murad Davudi.

Mexico

Mexico's disappeared people

During, Mexico's Dirty War in the 1970s, thousands of suspected guerrillas, leftists, and human rights defenders were disappeared, the exact number still unclear. During the 1970s, around 470 people were disappeared in the municipality of Atoyac de Álvarez alone.[93]

According to National Commission of Human Rights (CNDH), between 2006 and 2011, 5,397 people have disappeared. Of these, 3,457 are men, 1,885 are women, but there is no information about the other 55 (source BBC). Usually the forced disappearances occur in groups and are on people not related to the drug war which was started by President Felipe Calderón in 2006. The main difference from the kidnappings, is that usually there is no ransom asked for the disappeared.

Over 73,000 people in Mexico have been reported as disappeared in 2020, according to the Secretaría de Gobernación of Mexico.[94]

Morocco / Western Sahara

Moroccan writer Malika Oufkir, daughter of General Mohamed Oufkir, is a former "disappeared" in Morocco

Several Moroccan Army personnel suspected of being implicated in the 1970s coups against the King were held in secret detention camps such as Tazmamart, where some of them died due to poor conditions or lack of medical treatment. The most famous case of forced disappearance in Morocco is that of political dissident Mehdi Ben Barka, who disappeared in obscure circumstances in France in 1965. In February 2007, Morocco signed an international convention protecting people against forced disappearance.[95][96] In October 2007, Spanish judge Baltasar Garzón declared the competence of the Spanish jurisdiction in the Spanish-Sahrawi disappearances between 1976 and 1987 in Western Sahara (mostly controlled by Morocco). There have been charges brought against some Moroccan military heads, some of them currently in power as of 2010, such as the head of Morocco's armed forces, General Housni Benslimane, charged for the detention and disappearance campaign of Smara in 1976.[97] Garzón's successor, Judge Fernando Pablo Ruz, reopened the case in November 2010.[98]

North Korea

In North Korea, forced disappearances of nationals are characterized by detention without contact or explanation to the families of the detained. Foreign citizens, many of whom are ethnic Koreans who were living in South Korea and Japan, have been disappeared after willfully travelling to North Korea or after being abducted abroad.[99][100]

Northern Ireland and Ireland

"The Disappeared" is the name given to eighteen specific individuals[101][102] abducted and killed by the Provisional IRA, the Irish National Liberation Army, and other Irish republican organisations during the Troubles.[103]

In 1999, the IRA admitted to killing nine of the disappeared and gave information on the location of these bodies, but only three bodies were recovered on that occasion, one of which had already been exhumed and placed in a coffin.[104] The best-known case was that of Jean McConville, a Belfast mother of 10, widowed a few months before she disappeared, who the IRA claimed was an informer.[105] The search for her remains was abandoned in 1999,[106] but her body was discovered in 2003, a mile from where the IRA had indicated, by a family out on a walk.[105]

Since then seven more victims have been found—one in 2008,[107] three in 2010,[108][109][110] one in 2014, two in 2015 and one in 2017. As of 2017, three have yet to be located.[111]

The Independent Commission for the Location of Victims' Remains, established in 1999, is the body responsible for locating the disappeared.[112]

Pakistan

In Pakistan, forced disappearances allegedly began after the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. According to Amina Masood Janjua, a human rights activist and chairperson of Defence of Human Rights Pakistan; a not for profit organization working against enforced disappearance there are more than 5000 reported cases of enforced disappearance in Pakistan. There are no formal allegations or charges against the persons thus forcefully disappeared. The systematic practice of enforced disappearance in Pakistan originated in the era of military dictator General Pervez Musharraf.

Palestinian territories

In August 2015, four members of Hamas Armed wing were abducted in Sinai, Egypt. They were abducted by unidentified gunmen according to the Egyptian security officials. The abducted men were in a bus carrying fifty of the Palestinians from Rafah, to Cairo airport.

Hamas confirmed that the four abducted Palestinian were heading to Cairo. The spokesman of the interior ministry Iyad al Bazom said "We urge the Egyptian interior ministry to secure the lives of the kidnapped passengers and free them". Until the moment, no group claimed responsibility for the kidnappings.[113]

Philippines

Estimates vary for the number of victims of enforced disappearances in the Philippines. The William S. Richardson School of Law Library at the University of Hawaii places the number of the victims of enforced disappearances under the rule of Ferdinand Marcos at 783.[114]

An activist, Charlie del Rosario was a professor at the Polytechnic University of the Philippines was last seen live on the night of 13 March 1971 while putting posters for the national congress of the Movement for a Democratic Philippines (MDP), inside the PCC Lepanto Compound. Allegedly, the Philippine government military unit, Task Force Lawin abducted him.

His disappearance happened before the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus and the declaration of Martial Law. Charlie, who was never seen nor heard from hence, is considered as the first victim of enforced disappearance of the Marcos regime. The Filipino term of enforced disappearances of the Philippines are known as desaparecidos meaning victims of enforced disappearances. During the Marcos regime, there were many people who went missing but was allegedly reported to be tortured, abducted and killed by policemen.[115]

The Southern Tagalog 10 was a group of activists working in Central Luzon during Marcos' martial law in the Philippines.[116] These 10 university students and professors were abducted and made to disappear during martial law.[117] Three of them were later killed and "surfaced" by suspected agents of the state.[118] The rest remain missing to this day.[117]

Romania

During the communist regime of Nicolae Ceaușescu, it is claimed that forced disappearances occurred. For example, during the strikes of 1977 and 1987 in Romania, leading persons involved in the strikes are alleged to have been "disappeared".[119]

Russia

Russian rights groups estimate there have been about 5,000 forced disappearances in Chechnya since 1999.[120] Most of them are believed to be buried in several dozen mass graves.

The Russian government failed to pursue any accountability process for human rights abuses committed during the course of the conflict in Chechnya. Unable to secure justice domestically, hundreds of victims of abuse have filed applications with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). In March 2005 the court issued the first rulings on Chechnya, finding the Russian government guilty of violating the right to life and the prohibition of torture with respect to civilians who had died or been forcibly disappeared at the hands of Russia's federal troops.[121]

Since the Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation Amnesty International has documented several enforced disappearances of ethnic Crimean Tatars, none of which has been effectively investigated. On 24 May 2014 Ervin Ibragimov, a former member of the Bakhchysarai Town Council and a member of the World Congress of Crimean Tatars went missing. CCTV footage from a camera at a nearby shop documents that Ibragimov had been stopped by a group of men and that he is briefly speaking to the men before being forced in their van.[122] According to the Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group Russian authorities refuse to investigate the disappearance of Ibragimov.[123]

South Korea

Political prisoners lie on the ground before execution by South Korean troops near Daejon, South Korea.[124]

Forced disappearances and extrajudicial killings were openly used by South Korea during Jeju Island uprising, during the Korea War and as part of the Bodo league re-education during the Korean war. A taboo to speak about these incidents lasted till the end of authoritarian rule in South Korea in 1993.

South Korean soldiers walk among bodies of South Korean political prisoners shot near Daejon, South Korea.[124]

During the persecution of so-called leftist sympathizers during the war, ordinary civilians under suspicion were rounded up and grouped into four groups A, B, C and D. Groups C and D were shot immediately and buried in unmarked mass graves. A and B were drafted and/or sent on to death marches or held in Bodo League re-education facilities.

Survivors and family members of extrajudicially killed and disappeared or re-educated persons could face death and forced disappearance if they talked about these incidences during the period of authoritarian rule.

Many, if not all of the forced disappearances and accidentally discovered mass graves during authoritarian rule were wrongfully blamed on North Koreans or the People's Liberation Army of China. South Korea is currently involved in shedding light into some of these incidences using the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Some of the forced disappearance victims include high-profile politicians such as late South Korean President and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Kim Dae-jung who was forcefully disappeared from his Tokyo hotel room. His attempted murder by throwing him with weights on his legs over board into the open sea was stopped short by Japanese navy vessel warning fire.

Spain

A mass grave of Spanish republicans near Estépar in northern Spain. The excavation took place in July–August 2014.

The United Nations working group for Human Rights reported in 2013 that on the period between the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) and the end of Franco's dictatorship (1939–1975), an estimated 114,226 people "disappeared" by being forcibly taken away by either official or unofficial armed groups, following which they were secretly murdered and later buried in undisclosed locations. The report also mentions the systematic kidnapping and "stealing" of children and newborns, in numbers reaching 30,960 children, which continued even after the end of the dictatorship during the 1970s and 1980s.[125]

The disappearances include whole Republican military units, such as the 221st Mixed Brigade. The families of the deceased soldiers speculate that the bodies of the disappeared members of this unit may have ended up in unknown mass graves.[126][127]

It was not until 2008 that the first attempt was made to take the issue to court,[128] with that attempt failing and with the judge in charge of the process, Baltasar Garzón, being himself impeached and subsequently disqualified.[129] The UN's Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances has openly[130] stated that the Spanish Government is failing to its duties in these matters. As of 2017 the Spanish authorities keep actively hampering investigation into forced disappearances that took place during and after the civil war.[131]

Estimate of the Desaparecidos del franquismo

Identification and systematic analysis of the bones of victims in mass graves have not yet, to date, been undertaken by any government of the current Spanish democracy (since 1977).

According to La Nueva España newspaper, the data of people buried in mass graves brought before the Audiencia Nacional court on 16 October 2008 are the following:[132]

  • Andalusia 32,289 (Almería 373, Cádiz 1,665, Córdoba 7,091, Granada 5,048, Huelva 3,805, Jaén 3,253, Málaga 7,797, Sevilla 3,257)
  • Aragón 10,178 (Huesca 2,061, Teruel 1,338, Zaragoza 6,779)
  • Asturias 1,246 (Gijón 1,246)
  • Balearic Islands 1,777 (Mallorca 1,486, Menorca 106, Eivissa and Formentera 185)
  • Canary Islands 262 (Gran Canaria 200, Tenerife 62)
  • Cantabria 850
  • Castilla-La Mancha 7,067 (Albacete 1,026, Ciudad Real 1,694, Cuenca 377, Toledo 3,970)
  • Castilla-León 12,979 (Ávila 650, Burgos 4,800, León 1,250, Palencia 1,180, Salamanca 650 Segovia 370, Soria 287, Valladolid 2,555, Zamora 1,237)
  • Catalonia 2,400
  • Valencian Community 4,345 (Aicante 742, Castellón 1,303, Valencia 2,300)
  • Basque Country 9,459 (Álava 100, Guipúzcoa 340, Vizcaya 369, Basque Government data 8,650)
  • Extremadura 10,266
  • Galicia 4,396
  • La Rioja 2,007
  • Madrid 2,995
  • Murcia 855
  • Navarra 3,431
  • Ceuta, Melilla and North African territories 464
  • Other territories 7,000
  • Total 114,266 (the final total number was corrected and expanded in the course of the trials reaching a total of 143,353)

Sri Lanka

According to a United Nations 1999 study, Sri Lanka is the country that has the second highest number of disappeared people in the world (the first being Iraq). Since 1980, 12,000 Sri Lankans have gone missing after being detained by security forces. More than 55,000 people have been killed in the past 27 years.[133] The figures are still lower than the then-current Sri Lankan government's 2009 estimate of 17,000 people missing,[134] which was made after it came to power with a commitment to correct the human rights issues.

In 2003, the International Red Cross (ICRC)[135] restarted investigations into the disappearance of 11,000 people during Sri Lanka's civil war.

On 29 May 2009, the British newspaper The Times acquired confidential U.N. documents that record nearly 7,000 civilian deaths in the no-fire zone up to the end of April. The toll then surged, the paper quoted unidentified U.N. sources as saying, with an average of 1,000 civilians killed each day until 19 May, when the government declared victory over the Tamil Tiger rebels. That means the final death toll is more than 20,000, The Times said. "Higher", a U.N. source told the paper. "Keep going." The United Nations has previously said 7,000 civilians were killed in fighting between January and May. A top Sri Lankan official called the 20,000 figure unfounded. Gordon Weiss, a U.N. spokesman in Sri Lanka, told CNN that a large number of civilians were killed, though he did not confirm the 20,000 figure.

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has accused[136] Sri Lanka of "causing untold suffering".

Syria

Cases of forced disappearance in Syria started when late Syrian president Hafez al-Assad started to face opposition from citizens in the late 1970s. While he was able to buy elite merchants of Damascus through Badr el-Deen Shallah, the general public was outraged by Assad's policies in ruling the country and the rise of corruption. From then on, any voice opposing or questioning the Syrian government was silenced by forced disappearance or threats. According to Human Rights Watch, no fewer than 17,000 people disappeared during Assad's 30-year rule.[137]

Bashar al-Assad took his father's policy further and considered any voice questioning anything about Syria's political, economical, social, or otherwise policies should be monitored and when needed, detained and accused of weakening national empathy.[138] A recent case is Tal Mallohi, a 19-year-old blogger summoned for interrogation on 27 December 2009 who was released over 4 years later.[139]

In November 2015, Amnesty International released a report accusing the Syrian government and its allied militants of kidnapping tens of thousands people since 2011.[140] The international organization said that such acts represent a crime against humanity. The organization called Syrian government to allow the entry of the UN's international committee of inquiry observers in order to access information related to the detainees.

Amnesty International has claimed that more than 65,000 people, mostly civilians, have been forcibly disappeared between March 2011 and August 2015.

The Syrian government, on the other hand, has repeatedly denied reports accusing it of committing crimes against humanity.

Thailand

In 2013, the Bangkok Post reported that Police General Vasit Dejkunjorn, founder of the Thai Spring movement, told a seminar that forced disappearance is a tool which corrupt state power uses to eliminate individuals deemed a threat.[141]

According to Amnesty Thailand, at least 59 human-rights defenders have been victims of forced disappearance between 1998 and 2018.[142] Attorney Somchai Neelapaijit, Karen-ethnic activist Pholachi "Billy" Rakchongcharoen, and villager-turned-activist, Den Khamlae[143][144] are among those who disappeared.[142]

On 12 March 2004, Somchai Neelapaijit, a well-known Thai Muslim activist lawyer in the kingdom's southern region, was kidnapped by Thai police and has since disappeared. Officially listed as a disappeared person, his presumed widow, Mrs Ankhana Neelapaichit, has been seeking justice for her husband since Somchai went missing. On 11 March 2009, Mrs Neelapaichit was part of a special panel at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Thailand to commemorate her husband's disappearance and to keep attention focused on the case and on human rights abuses in Thailand.

According to the legal assistance group Thai Lawyers for Human Rights, at least 86 Thais left Thailand seeking asylum abroad following the military takeover in May 2014. Among them are the four members of the Thai band Fai Yen, some of whose songs mock the monarchy, a serious offense in Thailand. The band, whose name means 'cool fire', announced on social media that its members feared for their lives after "many trusted people told us that the Thai military will come to kill us."[145] All of those who disappeared in late-2018 and early-2019 were accused by Thai authorities of anti-monarchical activity.[146]

Two Thai activists went missing while living in exile in Vientiane: Itthipol Sukpaen vanished in June 2016. Wuthipong "Ko Tee" Kochathamakun disappeared from his residence in July 2017. Eyewitnesses said Wuthipong was abducted by a group of Thai-speaking men dressed in black.[147]

In December 2018, Surachai Danwattananusorn, a Thai political exile, and two aides went missing from their home in Vientiane, Laos. The two aides were later found murdered.[148] Some in the Thai media see the forced disappearances and murders as a warning to anti-monarchists.[149] As of January 2019, Surachai remains missing. The number of "disappeared" Thai activists exiled in Laos may be as high as five since 2015.[150]

Siam Theerawut, Chucheep Chivasut, and Kritsana Thapthai, three Thai anti-monarchy activists, went missing on 8 May 2019, when they are thought to have been extradited to Thailand from Vietnam after they attempted to enter the country with counterfeit Indonesian passports. The trio are wanted in Thailand for insulting the monarchy and failing to report when summoned by the junta after the 2014 Thai coup d'état.[151][152] Their disappearance passed the one year mark on 8 May 2020 with still no sign of the trio.[153]

Thai pro-democracy activist Wanchalearn Satsaksit was abducted from Phnom Penh on 4 June 2020,[154] which prompted public concern and became one factor behind the 2020 Thai protests.[155]

Turkey

Turkish human rights groups accuse the Turkish security forces of being responsible for the disappearance of more than 1,500[156] civilians of the Kurdish minority in the 1980s and 1990s, in attempts to root out the PKK. Every week on Saturdays since 1995, Saturday Mothers hold silent vigil / sit-in protests to demand that their lost ones be found and those responsible be brought to justice. Each year Yakay-Der, the Turkish Human Rights Association (İHD) and the International Committee Against Disappearances (ICAD), organise a series of events in Turkey to mark the "Week of Disappeared People".

In April 2009, state prosecutors in Turkey ordered the excavation of several sites around Turkey believed to hold Kurdish victims of state death squads from the 1980s and 1990s, in response to calls for Turkey's security establishment to come clean about past abuses.[157]

In a study published in June 2017 by Sweden-based Stockholm Center for Freedom, 12 individual cases of enforced disappearances in Turkey since 2016 were documented under the emergency rule. The research titled as "Enforced Disappearances in Turkey" claimed that all cases were connected to clandestine elements within Turkish security forces. Turkish authorities were reluctant to investigate the cases despite pleas from family members.[158]

Ukraine

During the War in Donbass there had been many cases of forced disappearances on the territory of the so-called Donetsk People's Republic (DPR or DNR). The DPR leader Alexander Zakharchenko said that his forces detained up to five "Ukrainian subversives" each day. It was estimated that about 632 people were under illegal detention by separatist forces on 11 December 2014.[159]

On 2 June 2017 the freelance journalist Stanislav Aseyev was abducted. Firstly the de facto DNR government denied knowing his whereabouts but on 16 July, an agent of the DNR's "Ministry of State Security" confirmed that Aseyev was in their custody and that he is suspected of "espionage". Independent media is not allowed to report from the "DNR"-controlled territory.[160]

United States

According to Amnesty International (AI), the United States has engaged in forced disappearance of prisoners of war in the course of its War on Terror. AI lists at "least 39 detainees, all of whom are still missing, who are believed to have been held in secret sites run by the United States government overseas."[161][162]

The United States Department of Defense kept the identity of the individuals it held in Guantánamo secret, from its opening, on 11 January 2002 to 20 April 2006.[163][164] An official list of the 558 individuals then held in the camp was published on 20 April 2006 in response to a court order from the United States District Judge Jed Rakoff. Another list, ostensibly of all 759 individuals who had been held in Guantanamo, was published on 20 May 2006.[165]

Former Yugoslavia

Thousands of people were subject to forced disappearance during the Yugoslav Wars.[166][167][168]

Enforced disappearances within migration

The increasingly perilous journeys of migrants and refugees and the ever more rigid migration policies of States cause a particular risk for migrants to become victims of enforced disappearances.[169] This has been recognized by the UN's Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances.[170] Also the UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances recognized the increased risk of enforced disappearances as a result of migration in the Guiding Principles for the Search of Disappeared Persons.[171]

See also

References

  1. Jean-Marie Henckaerts; Louise Doswald-Beck; International Committee of the Red Cross (2005). Customary International Humanitarian Law: Rules. Cambridge University Press. p. 342. ISBN 978-0-521-80899-6.
  2. Baranowska, Grażyna (August 2017). "Advances and progress in the obligation to return the remains of missing and forcibly disappeared persons". International Review of the Red Cross. 99 (905): 709–733. doi:10.1017/S181638311800036X. ISSN 1816-3831.
  3. Finucane, Brian (2010). "Enforced Disappearance as a Crime Under International Law". Yale Journal of International Law. 35: 171. SSRN 1427062.
  4. "OHCHR | WGEID - Annual reports". www.ohchr.org. Retrieved 17 July 2019.
  5. United Nations Commission on Human Rights, E / CN.4 / 2002/71, 8 January 2002
  6. Office of United States Chief of Counsel for Prosecution of Axis Criminality, Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression, 8 vols. and 2 suppl. vols.VII, 873-874 (Doc. No. L-90)Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1946-1948.
  7. E/CN.4/2002/71-page 37
  8. Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, 1974 OEA / Ser.L / V / II.34, Doc.31, Rev.1, of 30 December 1974
  9. Resolution 4 (XXXI) of the Commission on Human Rights of 13 February 1975
  10. General Assembly resolution 3450 (XXX) of 9 December 1975. General Assembly resolution 3448 (XXX) of 9 December 1975.
  11. "... the Assembly expresses ... its special concern and indignation at the incessant disappearance of persons who, according to available evidence, can be attributed to political reasons and to the refusal of the Chilean authorities to accept their responsibility for the large number of Persons under such conditions or to explain it, or even to conduct an adequate investigation of the cases that have been brought to their attention." General Assembly resolution 32/118 of 16 December 1977, para. 2.
  12. Eduardo Febbro, Una iniciativa de Argentina y de Francia con historia accidentada. El Pais, 20 June 2006
  13. E/CN.4/2002/71-page 10
  14. A / 34/583 / Add.1 21 November 1979
  15. OEA AG/Rev.443 (IX-0/79), para. 3
  16. OEA, AG/Res. 443 (IX-0/79), para. 5
  17. Bleier v. Uruguay, communication Nº 30/1978
  18. Molina Theissen: Court I.D.H., Case of Velásquez Rodríguez, Judgment of 29 July 1988. Series C No. 4; And, Court I.D.H., Godínez Cruz Case, Judgment of 20 January 1989. Series C No. 5.
  19. Case of Caballero-Delgado and Santana v. Colombia, complaint No. 10319/1989, judgment of 8 December 1995
  20. Blake v. Guatemala, complaint No. 11219/1993, judgment of 24 January 1998. Villigran Morales y Alcase v. Guatemala, complaint No. 11383/1994, judgment of 19 November 1999. Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala, complaint No. 11129/1993, judgment of 25 November 2000.
  21. Durán and Ugarte v. Peru, Complaints Num. 10009 and 10078/1987, judgment of 16 August 2000
  22. Trujillo Oroza v. Bolivia, judgment of 26 January 2000
  23. E / CN.4 / 2002/71 pag. 20-23
  24. Palic v. Republika Srpska, Case No. CH / 99/3196, decision on admissibility and merits, 11 January 2001
  25. Unkovic v. The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Case No. CH / 99/2150, decision on admissibility and merits of 9 November 2001.
  26. Colombia, Guatemala, Paraguay, Perú y Venezuela. E/CN.4/2002/71, page 28
  27. E/CN.4/2002/71-page 28
  28. United Nations, E/CN.4/2001/69, 21 December 2000.
  29. Le Monde 6 February 2007, Droits de l'homme : un traité international sur les disparitions forcées Archived 8 February 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  30. "ACNUDH | Inicio". ohchr.org (in Spanish). Retrieved 16 May 2017.
  31. Implementation of General Assembly resolution 60/251 of 15 March 2006 entitled "Human Rights Council" Template:Http://repository.un.org/bitstream/handle/11176/262138/A{{dead link|date=December 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }} HRC 2 SR.3-ES.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  32. A/HRC/13/31. Annex II, page 134.
  33. Landers, Neil Grant (2013). "Representing the Algerian ivil War: Literature, History, and the State" (PDF).
  34. "Algeria: Amnesty Law Risks Legalizing Impunity for Crimes Against Humanity (Human Rights Watch, 14-4-2005)". Hrw.org. 13 April 2005. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
  35. Goyochea, Agueda (2007). Centros Clandestinos de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto Espacio para la Memoria.
  36. Robben, Antonius C. G. M. (September 2005). "Anthropology at War?: What Argentina's Dirty War Can Teach Us". Anthropology News. 46 (6): 6. doi:10.1525/an.2005.46.6.5. ISSN 1541-6151.
  37. Gandsman, Ari (16 April 2009). "'A Prick of a Needle Can Do No Harm': Compulsory Extraction of Blood in the Search for the Children of Argentina's Disappeared". The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology. 1. 14: 162–184. doi:10.1111/j.1935-4940.2009.01043.x.
  38. Long, WIlliam R (13 March 2013). "Death Flight Tale Rekindles Memories of 'Dirty War': Argentina: Ex-officer describes throwing leftists out of planes into sea. Thousands believed victims of this policy". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 17 April 2013.
  39. Hernandez, Vladimir (23 March 2013). "Painful search for Argentina's disappeared". BBC Mundo. Retrieved 13 April 2013.
  40. "Argentina's Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo awarded UNESCO peace prize". UN News Centre. 4 March 2011. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
  41. How an Argentinian man learned his 'father' may have killed his real parents The Guardian, 2016
  42. "Part VI: Recommendations and Conclusions: Conclusions". Nunca Más (Never Again): Report of CONADEP (National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons). National Commission on the Disappeared (CONADEP). September 1984. Archived from the original on 2 October 2003. Retrieved 13 January 2011.
  43. Alemparte Diaz, Luis Filipe (July 1978). "Page A-8" (PDF). Argentine Military Intelligence estimate on the number of disappeared (PDF) (in Spanish). Washington, D.C.: National Security Archive.
  44. "International Week of the Disappeared" (PDF). Statement on the International Week of the Disappeared. Odhikar. 25 May 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
  45. David Bergman (20 October 2014). "'Forced disappearances' surge in Bangladesh". Al Jazeera. Al Jazeera Media Network.
  46. Hussain, Maaz. "Enforced Disappearances Rise in Bangladesh". VOA. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
  47. "ASK Documentation: Forced Disappearances: January to September 2014" (PDF). Ain o Salish Kendra. 13 October 2014.
  48. "DCC councillor Chowdhury Alam arrested". The Daily Star. 26 June 2010.
  49. "How Alam was abducted: Driver's account". The Daily Star. 13 July 2010.
  50. "ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE: Families call for return of 19 youths". The New Age. 5 December 2015.
  51. "Bangladesh: Investigate Case of Enforced Disappearance". New York: Human Rights Watch. 17 March 2015.
  52. "Editorial: The disappearance of Chowdhury Alam". The Daily Star. 14 July 2010.
  53. "16 Years of Silence: Enforced Disappearances in Belarus Must Be Investigated". Amnesty International. 18 September 2015.
  54. Belarus: How death squads targeted opposition politicians
  55. "Bosnia and Herzegovina: 20 years of denial and injustice". www.amnesty.org. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  56. Pinochet Is History: But how will it remember him? Archived 15 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine National Review Symposium, 11 December 2006
  57. Stern, Steve J. (8 September 2004). Remembering Pinochet's Chile. 30 September 2004: Duke University Press. pp. 32, 90, 101, 180–81. ISBN 978-0-8223-3354-8.CS1 maint: location (link), accessed 10-24-2006 through Google Books.
  58. Eduardo Gallardo, Pinochet Was Unrepentant to the End, ABC News (Associated Press), 11 December 2006
  59. Kornbluh, Peter (2003). "Chapter 1: Finding the Pinochet File: Pursuing Truth, Justice, and Historical Memory Through Declassified U.S. Documents". In Nagy-Zekmi, Silvia; Leiva, Fernando (eds.). Democracy in Chile. Brighton, Eng.: Sussex Academic Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-84519-081-1. OCLC 60373757. Retrieved 9 June 2014.
  60. Ex-Chilean leader 'was murdered', BBC, 23 January 2007
  61. Capítulos desconocidos de los mercenarios chilenos en Honduras camino de Iraq Archived 27 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine, La Nación, 25 September 2005 – URL accessed on 14 February 2007 (in Spanish)
  62. Su revolución contra nuestra revolución: izquierdas y derechas en el Chile, Verónica Valdivia Ortiz de Zárate, p. 179, 2006. LOM Ediciones. 2006. ISBN 978-956-282-853-6. Retrieved 10 March 2010.
  63. "China in Tibet - Panchen Lama | Dreams of Tibet | FRONTLINE | PBS". www.pbs.org.
  64. www.tibetanreview.net http://www.tibetanreview.net/dalai-lama-cites-reliable-source-as-saying-panchen-lama-alive-speaks-well-for-the-chinese-appointed-counter/. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  65. "Gedhun Choekyi Nyima the XIth Panchen Lama turns 18: Still disappeared". www.buddhistchannel.tv.
  66. "Tibet's missing spiritual guide". 16 May 2005.
  67. Holder of the white lotus : the lives of the Dalai Lama. Little, Brown. 2008. p. 165. ISBN 978-0-316-85988-2.
  68. "China says Panchen Lama 'living a normal life' 20 years after disappearance". The Guardian. 6 September 2015.
  69. "Hong Kong: Missing Booksellers Spark Deep Anxiety". TIME.com. Retrieved 21 May 2016.
  70. "Hong Kong bookstore disappearances shock publishing industry - BBC News". BBC News. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  71. "The Case of the Missing Hong Kong Book Publishers". The New Yorker. Retrieved 9 January 2016.
  72. "Aterradora cifra de desaparecidos por paramilitares y guerrilla". canalrcnmsn.com. Archived from the original on 8 July 2011. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
  73. "Egypt 2017/2018". www.amnesty.org. Retrieved 31 May 2018.
  74. "EGYPT: 'OFFICIALLY, YOU DO NOT EXIST'" (PDF).
  75. "Belady". www.belady-ih.org. Retrieved 31 May 2018.
  76. Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances (26 October 2007). Mission to El Salvador (Report). United Nations Human Rights Council. pp. 8–9. A/HRC/7/2/Add.2.
  77. Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak UNHCR
  78. "Everything you need to know about human rights. - Amnesty International". amnesty.org.
  79. McAllister, Carlota (2010). "A Headlong Rush into the Future". In Grandin, Greg; Joseph, Gilbert (eds.). A Century of Revolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. pp. 276–309. ISBN 978-0-8223-9285-9. Retrieved 14 January 2014.
  80. "U.S. POLICY IN GUATEMALA, 1966–1996". gwu.edu.
  81. (McClintock 1985: 82–83; CIIDH and GAM 1998
  82. Ensaaf - About Us Archived 17 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 8 November 2015.
  83. Ensaaf and the Benetech Human Rights Data Analysis Group (HRDAG). Violent Deaths and Enforced Disappearances During the Counterinsurgency in Punjab, India: A Preliminary Quantitative Analysis. 26 January 2009.
  84. Shujaat Bukhari. "2,156 unidentified bodies in Kashmir graves to undergo DNA profiling". The Hindu. Retrieved 21 May 2016.
  85. Jason Burke. "Kashmir unmarked graves hold thousands of bodies". the Guardian. Retrieved 21 May 2016.
  86. "Mass Graves Hold Thousands, Kashmir Inquiry Finds". The New York Times. 23 August 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2016.
  87. "Kidnapping, lynching and deliberate killings: Iraq's protesters live in fear they 'could be next'". The Independent. Retrieved 15 December 2019.
  88. "New Arrests And "Disappearances" Of Iranian Students". Hrw.org. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
  89. "UN experts urge Iran to observe human rights norms in case of dead journalist". Hrea.org. Archived from the original on 28 July 2011. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
  90. "BBC report". BBC News. 28 February 2008. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
  91. "Clashes at Iran teachers protest". BBC News. 26 January 2002. Retrieved 2 May 2010.
  92. "WAN protests disappearances in Iran". Ifex.org. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
  93. "Rosendo Radilla case: new investigations in Atoyac de Álvarez". PBI Mexico.
  94. "México tiene más de 73,000 personas desaparecidas, actualiza Segob". Forbes. 13 July 2020.
  95. "Finally tackling the threat of 'disappearance' – Radio Netherlands Worldwide – English". Radionetherlands.nl. Archived from the original on 28 August 2007. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
  96. http://www.map.ma/fr/sections/boite4/la_signature_par_le/view. Retrieved 7 February 2007. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  97. "Genocide investigations into Morocco's Sahara occupation". Afrol News. 31 October 2007. Retrieved 27 November 2010.
  98. (in Spanish)
  99. "UN says North Korea is like a Nazi state: Main findings". cbc.ca. 17 February 2014.
  100. "U.N. Panel Says North Korean Leader Could Face Trial". The New York Times. 18 February 2014. Retrieved 21 May 2016.
  101. "Lisa Dorrian". The Disappeared of Northern Ireland. Archived from the original on 25 June 2014. Retrieved 3 May 2014.
  102. "About the Disappeared". The Disappeared of Northern Ireland. Archived from the original on 18 November 2013. Retrieved 3 May 2014.
  103. "The Disappeared". Independent Commission for the Location of Victims' Remains. Retrieved 3 May 2014.
  104. Maillot, Agnes (2005). New Sinn Féin: Irish Republicanism in the Twenty-first Century. Routledge. pp. 162–165. ISBN 978-0-415-32197-6. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  105. Maillot (2005), p. 165.
  106. "'Disappeared' families put lives on hold". BBC News. 20 July 1999. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  107. "Funeral for Disappeared victim". BBC News. 22 December 2008. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  108. "Funeral for Charlie Armstrong, 'Disappeared' victim". BBC News. 16 September 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  109. "Body found in 'Disappeared' search for Peter Wilson". BBC News. 2 November 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  110. "Remains were 'Disappeared' Crossmaglen man Gerry Evans". BBC News. 29 November 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  111. Ryan, Órla (10 May 2017). "Remains found in France confirmed to be Seamus Ruddy". TheJournal.ie. Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  112. "Independent Commission for the Location of Victims' Remains: homepage". Retrieved 3 May 2014.
  113. "Four Palestinian Hamas militants abducted in Egypt's Sinai - sources". Reuters. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
  114. Inquirer (22 September 2018). "Tish, Jessica, Hermon and other missing martial law activists". Inquirer. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  115. Reyes, Rachela A.G (12 April 2016). "3,257: Fact Checking the Marcos killings, 1975-1985". The Manila Times. Retrieved 14 December 2019.
  116. Ilagan, Bonifacio P. (11 October 2017). "The story of the Southern Tagalog 10". Bantayog ng mga Bayani. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  117. "Southern Tagalog 10". Samahan ng mga Ex-Detainees Laban sa Detensyon at Aresto (SELDA). 22 October 2012. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  118. Faustino, Joey. "Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances". Asian Federation Against Involuntary Disappearances. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
  119. Forsythe, David P. Encyclopedia of Human Rights, Volume 1. Harvard University Press, 1971, p. 200.
  120. "BBC NEWS - Europe - Russia censured over Chechen man". bbc.co.uk.
  121. European Court Rules Against Moscow Institute for War and Peace Reporting, 2 March 2005M
  122. "URGENT ACTION: CRIMEAN TATAR ACTIVIST FORCIBLY DISAPPEARED" (PDF). Amnesty International.
  123. "Russia refuses to investigate the abduction of prominent Crimean Tatar activist Ervin Ibragimov". Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group.
  124. Charles J. Hanley & Hyung-Jin Kim (10 July 2010). "Korea bloodbath probe ends; US escapes much blame". San Diego Union Tribune. Associated Press. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
  125. "Observaciones preliminares del Grupo de Trabajo sobre las Desapariciones Forzadas o Involuntarias de la ONU al concluir su visita a España". OHCHR. 30 September 2013.
  126. "Memoria Digital, 221 Brigada Mixta". Elche.
  127. "Re: Necesito ayuda datos de la brigada mixta 221 y 222 en Castellon y Valencia". Melodysoft.com.
  128. Ediciones El País (16 October 2008). "Garzón abre la primera causa de la historia contra el franquismo". EL PAÍS. Retrieved 21 May 2016.
  129. Unidad Editorial Internet (15 March 2010). "Las claves de las tres causas de Garzón en el Tribunal Supremo". Retrieved 21 May 2016.
  130. "A/HRC/27/49/Add.1 - E - A/HRC/27/49/Add.1". undocs.org. Retrieved 19 June 2019.
  131. Marta Borraz (30 August 2017). "España sigue bloqueando la investigación de las desapariciones del franquismo tras 15 años de reproches de la ONU". eldiario.es. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
  132. "Report". La Nueva España. 16 October 2008.
  133. "Sri Lanka's disappeared thousands". BBC News. 28 March 1999. Retrieved 30 March 2010.
  134. "SRI LANKA: Registers on entry and leaving of internally displaced persons needs to be created urgently to prevent forced disappearances". Ahrchk.net. 16 June 2009. Retrieved 30 December 2010.
  135. "Red Cross tackles war missing". BBC News. 19 February 2003. Retrieved 30 March 2010.
  136. Sengupta, Somini (23 April 2009). "U.S. Faults Sri Lanka on Civilian Woes". The New York Times. Retrieved 30 March 2010.
  137. Wasted Decade: Human Rights in Syria during Bashar al-Asad's First Ten Years in Power, Human Rights Watch, 2010 Report
  138. "Syrian President Bashar al-Assad: Facing down rebellion". BBC News. 21 October 2015. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
  139. "Tal al-Mallohi is free, the Syrian people triumph". Middle East Monitor. 11 February 2014. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
  140. منظمة العفو الدولية تدين عمليات اختفاء قسري في سوريا (in Arabic). Reuters. 5 November 2015. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  141. Bangprapa, Mongkol; Charoensuthipan, Penchan (23 June 2013). "Govt urged to tackle 'state killings'". Bangkok Post.
  142. Saengpassa, Chularat (5 December 2018). "Bill on torture to go before NLA". The Nation. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  143. Cooper, Zac; Van Buskirk, Caroline; Fernes, Praveena (17 May 2017). "Den Khamlae – The disappearing face of a land rights movement". The Isaan Record. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  144. "Activist goes missing amid land dispute". Bangkok Post. 22 April 2016. Retrieved 5 December 2018.
  145. Bengali, Shashank (28 May 2019). "Arrests, killings strike fear in Thailand's dissidents: 'The hunting has been accelerated'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
  146. Vejpongsa, Tassanee; Peck, Grant (31 May 2019). "Thai musicians in exile for their songs fear for their lives". Merced Sun-Star. Associated Press. Retrieved 2 June 2019.
  147. "Solve Mekong killings case" (Opinion). Bangkok Post. 25 January 2019. Retrieved 25 January 2019.
  148. Smith, Nicola (24 January 2019). "Gruesome Laos deaths of Thai activists sends chill through dissident community in exile". The Telegraph. Retrieved 25 January 2019.
  149. Rojanaphruk, Pravit (26 January 2019). "Opinion: Unmistakable Message to Thailand Surfaces in Mekong". Khaosod English. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  150. Norman, Anne (30 January 2019). "What do Thailand and Saudi Arabia have in common?" (Opinion). The Washington Post. Retrieved 2 February 2019.
  151. Rojanaphruk, Pravit (14 May 2019). "FAMILY HOPES MISSING REPUBLICAN IS STILL ALIVE". Khaosod English. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
  152. Hay, Wayne (13 May 2019). "Thailand: Disappeared activists forced home from Vietnam". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 15 May 2019.
  153. "1 year on, disappeared activist Siam Theerawut's whereabouts remain unclear". Prachatai English. 16 May 2020. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
  154. "Cambodia to probe activist 'abduction'". Bangkok Post. 10 June 2020. Retrieved 10 June 2020.
  155. Chachavalpongpun, Pavin. "Opinion | Students in Bangkok are challenging Thailand's biggest taboo". The Washington Post. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
  156. "Los Desaparecidos – The Disappeared Turkish-Style - Diritti Globali". Diritti Globali (in Italian). 19 July 2018. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
  157. "Turkey Begins Dig for Missing Kurds". Voice of America News. 16 April 2009. Retrieved 16 August 2009.
  158. "Enforced Disappearances in Turkey" (PDF). Stockholm Center for Freedom. June 2017. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
  159. "Report on the human rights situation in Ukraine: 1 December 2014 to 15 February 2015" (PDF). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2 March 2015. p. 4. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  160. "URGENT ACTION: IMPRISONED JOURNALIST MUST BE RELEASED" (PDF) (Press release). Amnesty International. 21 July 2017. Retrieved 10 February 2018.
  161. "Off the Record: U.S. Responsibility for Enforced Disappearances in the 'War on Terror'". Amnesty International. 7 June 2007. Retrieved 8 May 2013.
  162. "USA: Torture, War Crimes, Accountability: Visit to Switzerland of Former U.S. President George W. Bush and Swiss Obligations Under International Law: Amnesty International's Memorandum to the Swiss Authorities". Amnesty International. 6 February 2011. Retrieved 8 May 2013.
  163. Larry Neumeister (23 January 2006). "Judge Orders Release of Gitmo Detainee IDs". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 13 March 2007. Retrieved 11 April 2015.
  164. Thom Shanker (26 February 2006). "Pentagon Plans to Tell Names of Detainees". The New York Times. Washington DC. Archived from the original on 21 September 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2015.
  165. OARDEC. "List of Individuals Detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba from January 2002 through May 15, 2006" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 15 May 2006. Works related to List of Individuals Detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba from January 2002 through 15 May 2006 at Wikisource
  166. Refugees, United Nations High Commissioner for. "Refworld | "Disappeared" in Former Yugoslavia". Refworld. Retrieved 28 September 2020.
  167. Citroni, Gabriella (2016). "The Specialist Chambers of Kosovo: The Applicable Law and the Special Challenges Related to the Crime of Enforced Disappearance". Journal of International Criminal Justice. 14 (1): 123–143. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqv084.
  168. "Balkans: Thousands still missing two decades after conflicts". www.amnesty.org. Retrieved 28 September 2020.
  169. Baranowska, Grażyna (2020). Disappeared Migrants and Refugees. The Relevance of the International Convention on Enforced Disappearance in their search and protection. German Institute for Human Rights. ISBN 978-3-946499-76-3.
  170. Report of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances on enforced disappearances in the context of migration, A/HRC/36/39/Add.2, 28 July 2017
  171. Guiding principles for the search for disappeared persons, CED/C/7, 8 May 2019
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.