Euribor

Euribors are used as a reference rate for euro-denominated forward rate agreements, short-term interest rate futures contracts and interest rate swaps, in very much the same way as LIBORs are commonly used for Sterling and US dollar-denominated instruments. They thus provide the basis for some of the world's most liquid and active interest rate markets.

Domestic reference rates, like Paris' PIBOR, Frankfurt's FIBOR, and Helsinki's Helibor merged into Euribor on EMU day on 1 January 1999.

Euribor should be distinguished from the less commonly used "Euro LIBOR" rates set in London by 16 major banks.[3]

Official reference: EURIBOR Technical features

A representative panel of banks provide daily quotes of the rate, rounded to two decimal places, that each Panel Bank believes one prime bank is quoting to another prime bank for interbank term deposits within the Euro zone, for maturity ranging from one week to one year. Every Panel Bank is required to directly input its data no later than 11:00 a.m. (CET) on each day that the Trans-European Automated Real-Time Gross-Settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET) is open. At 11:02 a.m. (CET), GRSS (Global Rate Set Systems) will instantaneously publish the reference rate on Refinitiv (ex. Reuters), Bloomberg and a number of other information providers which will then be made available to all their subscribers. The published rate is a rounded, truncated mean of the quoted rates: the highest and lowest 15% of quotes are eliminated, the remainder are averaged and the result is rounded to 3 decimal places. Euribor rates are spot rates, i.e. for a start two working days after measurement day. Like US money-market rates, they are Actual/360, i.e. calculated with an exact daycount over a 360-day year. Euribor was first published on 30 December 1998 for value 4 January 1999.

The other widely used reference rate in the euro-zone is Eonia, also published by the European Banking Federation, which is the daily weighted average of overnight rates for unsecured interbank lending in the euro-zone, i.e. like the federal funds rate in the US. The banks contributing to Eonia were the same as the Panel Banks contributing to Euribor. However "On 1st June 2013 the Eonia® and Euribor® respective panels of contributing banks have been differentiated."(EMMI website)

On Thursday, 29 May 2008, The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) released a controversial study suggesting that banks might have understated borrowing costs they reported for Libor during the 2008 credit crunch.[8] Such under-reporting could have created an impression that banks could borrow from other banks more cheaply than they could in reality. It could also have made the banking system or specific contributing bank appear healthier than it was during the 2008 credit crunch. For example, the study found that rates at which one major bank (Citigroup) "said it could borrow dollars for three months were about 0.87 percentage point lower than the rate calculated using default-insurance data."

On 27 June 2012, Barclays Bank was fined $200m by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission,[9] $160m by the United States Department of Justice[10] and £59.5m by the Financial Services Authority[11] for attempted manipulation of the Libor and Euribor rates.[12]

On December 2013, JPMorgan Chase, HSBC and Crédit agricole were fined €1.7 billion.

• Euro
• European Banking Federation
• Prime rate
• Federal funds rate
• EONIA
• SONIA
• SARON
• MUTAN
• LIBOR

• European Central Bank
• Euribor homepage
• Euribor historical data (informative)
• Euribor Rate, Daily Update (Bank of Finland)
• Euribor homepage (informative historical data can also be found here)