Hippocamp (moon)

Hippocamp, also designated Neptune XIV, is a small moon of Neptune discovered on 1 July 2013. It was found by astronomer Mark Showalter by analyzing archived Neptune photographs the Hubble Space Telescope captured between 2004 and 2009. The moon is so dim that it was not observed when the Voyager 2 space probe flew by Neptune and its moons in 1989. It is about 35 km (20 mi) in diameter, and orbits Neptune in about 23 hours, just under one Earth day. Due to its unusually close distance to Neptune's largest inner moon Proteus, it has been hypothesized that Hippocamp may have accreted from material ejected by an impact on Proteus several billion years ago. The moon was formerly known by its provisional designation S/2004 N 1 until February 2019, when it was formally named Hippocamp, after the mythological sea-horse symbolizing Poseidon in Greek mythology.

This article is about the Neptunian moon. For other uses, see Hippocampus (disambiguation).
Hippocamp
Composite of Hubble images from 2009 showing Neptune, its rings, and inner moons including Hippocamp (circled)[lower-alpha 1]
Discovery[1]
Discovered byM. R. Showalter
I. de Pater
J. J. Lissauer
R. S. French
Discovery date1 July 2013
Designations
Designation
Neptune XIV
Pronunciation/ˈhɪpəkæmp/[2]
Named after
ἱππόκαμπος hippokampos
S/2004 N 1
AdjectivesHippocampian /hɪpəˈkæmpiən/[3]
Orbital characteristics[4]
Epoch 1 January 2020 (JD 2458849.5)
105,283 km
Eccentricity0.00084±0.00032
0.95 d (22.8 h)
329.901°
Inclination0.0641°±0.0507° (to Neptune's equator)[5]
0.0019° (to local Laplace plane)[4]
110.467°
305.446°
Satellite ofNeptune
Physical characteristics
Mean radius
17.4±2.0 km[5]
Mass(1.029–30.87)×1015 kg[4]
Mean density
≈1.3 g/cm3 (assumed)[6]
synchronous
Albedo≈0.09 (assumed)[5]
26.5±0.3[6][7]

    History

    Discovery

    Hippocamp was discovered by a team of astronomers led by Mark Showalter of the SETI Institute on 1 July 2013. Showalter was examining archival Hubble Space Telescope images of Neptune from 2009, as part of his study on the ring arcs of Neptune. Since the inner moons and ring arcs of Neptune orbit quickly, Showalter developed and used a technique similar to panning, where multiple short-exposure images are gathered and digitally offset to compensate for orbital motion and to allow stacking of multiple images to bring out faint details.[8][9] On a whim, Showalter decided to extend his analysis to regions beyond Neptune's ring system; he then found Hippocamp as a faint but unambiguous white dot.[8][10]

    To confirm the moon, Showalter further analyzed over 150 archival Hubble images going back to 2004.[8] Within a week, Showalter repeatedly found Hippocamp in these images and was able to identify the moon at ten different observation times from 2004 to 2009.[7][11] Showalter had also checked images from the Voyager 2 spacecraft to find any detections of Hippocamp during its 1989 Neptune flyby, but was unable to identify the moon since it was too dim to be detected by Voyager 2's cameras. Nonetheless, the number of archival Hubble images with Hippocamp was enough to determine the moon's orbit.[8][7][10] The discovery of Hippocamp was formally announced in a notice issued by the International Astronomical Union's Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, along with a press release by the Space Telescope Science Institute on 15 July 2013.[7][8] Given that the relevant images examined by Showalter were available to the public, the discovery could have been made by anyone.[10]

    Naming

    The moon is named after the hippocampus, a mythological creature depicted as having the upper body of a horse with the lower body of a fish in Greek mythology.[12] The hippocampus symbolizes the Greek sea god Poseidon as well as the Roman sea god Neptune.[13][12] In Roman mythology, Neptune would often drive a sea-chariot pulled by hippocampi.[12]

    Upon the announcement of its discovery, the moon was given the provisional designation S/2004 N 1. The provisional designation indicates that it was the first Neptunian satellite identified in images dating from 2004.[7] Follow-up Hubble observations of Hippocamp were conducted by Showalter in 2016, and the moon was later given its permanent Roman numeral designation by the Minor Planet Center after its recovery.[14][15] Hippocamp was formally numbered as Neptune XIV (14) on 25 September 2018, though it remained without an official name until February 2019.[15]

    By the International Astronomical Union's (IAU's) nomenclature guidelines, name proposals for Neptune's moons must be based on a figure from Greco-Roman mythology with a relationship to Poseidon or Neptune.[13][16] Showalter and his team had sought for names since the announcement of their discovery; among the names considered was Polyphemus, the gigantic one-eyed son of Poseidon and Thoosa.[17] Showalter then settled on the name Hippocamp in acknowledgement of the seahorse genus, Hippocampus, mainly for his passion for scuba diving and the animal itself.[18] Showalter's name proposal was approved by the IAU's naming committee on 20 February 2019, and the name was announced in a press release by the Space Telescope Science Institute.[19][16]

    Origin
    Size comparison of Neptune's seven inner moons

    The mass distribution of the Neptunian moons is the most lopsided of the satellite systems of the giant planets in the Solar System. One moon, Triton, makes up nearly all of the mass of the system, with all other moons together comprising only one third of one percent. The reason for the lopsidedness of the present Neptunian system is that Triton was captured from the Kuiper belt well after the formation of Neptune's original satellite system, much of which was destroyed in the process of capture. Triton's orbit upon capture is presumed to have been highly eccentric, which would have caused chaotic perturbations in the orbits of the original inner Neptunian satellites, leading to the ejection of some moons and the collisional destruction of others.[20][21] At least some of Neptune's present inner satellites are thought to have then accreted from the resulting rubble after Triton's orbit was circularized by tidal deceleration.[22]

    Among these re-accreted moons are Proteus, the largest and outermost of Neptune's present inner moons. Proteus bears a large impact crater named Pharos, which has a diameter around 250 km (160 mi)—more than half the diameter of Proteus itself. This unusually large size of Pharos relative to Proteus implies that the impact event that formed the crater would have nearly disrupted Proteus and ejected a significant amount of debris.[23][5] The present orbit of Proteus is situated relatively close to that of Hippocamp, which orbits just 12,000 km (7,500 mi) interior of Proteus. Their orbital semi-major axes differ by only ten percent, implying that both had likely originated from the same position in the past. This is further evidenced by accounting for the moons' respective outward orbital migration rates, which also suggests that Hippocamp and Proteus were much closer together in the past.[24] Ordinarily, two adjoining objects of disparate sizes would have either resulted in the smaller object being ejected or colliding with the larger object—this does not appear to be the case for Hippocamp and Proteus.[12][16]

    Based on this evidence, Showalter and colleagues proposed that Hippocamp may have originated from debris ejected from Proteus by the cometary impact that formed its largest crater, Pharos. In this scenario, Hippocamp would be considered as a third-generation satellite of Neptune, originating from impacts on Neptune's reformed regular moons after the capture of Triton.[12] The regular moons of Neptune are thought to have been disrupted by cometary impacts multiple times, with only Proteus surviving intact despite being nearly disrupted by the Pharos impact event.[20] Some of the debris ejected by the impact settled into a stable orbit 1,000–2,000 km (620–1,240 mi) interior to Proteus, and coalesced into Hippocamp.[5] However, Hippocamp only accounts for two percent of the missing volume of material generated by the Pharos impact event, and the reason for the absence of the rest of the debris remains unknown.[24]

    As with the other small inner moons of Neptune, Hippocamp is thought to have been repeatedly disrupted by comet impacts after it had coalesced from debris ejected from Proteus. Based on the formation rate of large craters on Proteus, Hippocamp is estimated to have been disrupted about nine times in the past 4 billion years, re-accreting back after each disruption event.[25] These disruption events substantially reduce the moon's orbital eccentricity and inclination, providing an explanation for Hippocamp's present circular orbit despite its proximity to Proteus. Hippocamp had also likely lost some of its mass during these disruption events, possibly accounting for some of the missing volume of material ejected from the Pharos impact event.[18] Proteus has since receded over 11,000 km (6,800 mi) from Neptune owing to tidal interactions with the planet, while Hippocamp remained close to its initial position where it formed as it migrates more slowly due to its smaller size.[5]

    Physical characteristics
    Artist's impression of Neptune and its smallest moon Hippocamp

    Hippocamp is the smallest known moon of Neptune, with a diameter estimated at 34.8 km (21.6 mi). It is about 1,000 times less massive and 4,000 times less voluminous than its hypothesized progenitor, Proteus.[5][16] Based on Hippocamp's estimated apparent magnitude of 26.5, its diameter was initially thought to be around 16–20 km (10–12 mi), but more recent observations revise this value upward two-fold.[7][5] Nevertheless, it remains by a wide margin the smallest of Neptune's inner, regular, satellites.[24]

    The surface properties of Hippocamp are unknown as it was not extensively studied through different wavelengths of light, particularly in the near-infrared spectrum. Hippocamp is assumed to resemble Neptune's other inner satellites in having a dark surface. Their geometrical albedos range from 0.07 to 0.10, with the average being about 0.09.[5][26] The Hubble Space Telescope's NICMOS instrument has examined Neptune's large inner moons in the near-infrared, and has found evidence that similar dark, reddish material, characteristic of small outer Solar System bodies, appears to be present on all their surfaces. The data is consistent with organic compounds containing C−H and/or C≡N bonds, but spectral resolution was inadequate to identify the molecules.[27] Water ice, abundant in the outer Solar System, is believed to be present, but its spectral signature could not be observed (unlike the case of small Uranian moons).[28]

    Orbit
    Diagram of the orbits of Neptune's moons out to Triton, with Hippocamp's orbit highlighted

    Hippocamp completes one revolution around Neptune every 22 hours and 48 minutes (0.95 days), corresponding to a semi-major axis, or orbital distance of 105,283 km (65,420 mi).[7] For comparison, this distance is approximately 4.3 Neptune radii, or just over a quarter of the Earth–Moon distance.[lower-alpha 2] Both its inclination and eccentricity are close to zero.[5] It orbits between Larissa and Proteus, making it the second outermost of Neptune's regular satellites. Its small size at this location runs counter to a trend among the other regular Neptunian satellites of increasing diameter with increasing distance from the primary.[6]

    Being situated at a relatively close distance to the much larger Proteus, Hippocamp is subjected to its significant gravitational influence.[5] Its orbit is particularly sensitive to the mass of Proteus; orbital solutions using a variety of assumed masses for Proteus show that Hippocamp displays a significant in-orbit difference of around 100 km (62 mi). This can allow for an estimate of the mass of Proteus by observing its influence on Hippocamp's orbit for over a period of several decades.[4]

    Proteus and Hippocamp are nearly in a 11:13 mean-motion resonance, which may be the reason for Hippocamp's sensitivity to the mass of Proteus.[4] Both moons are outside the Neptune-synchronous orbit (Neptune's rotational period is 0.67 days or 16.1 hours) and are thus being tidally accelerated by Neptune and are migrating outward.[30] Compared to Hippocamp, Proteus migrates at a faster rate due to its higher mass and thus stronger tidal interaction with Neptune. Based on its orbital migration rate, Proteus is estimated to recede about 40 km (25 mi) from Neptune in 18 million years, in which it will enter a true 11:13 resonance with Hippocamp.[4] Additionally, the present orbital periods of Larissa and Hippocamp are within about one percent of a 3:5 orbital resonance.[lower-alpha 3]

    Notes
    1. The relative brightness of the moons is exaggerated in this composite of high and low exposure images. The color image of Neptune was taken separately by Hubble in August 2009.
    2. Given Neptune’s radius of 24,600 km[4] and the Moon's semi-major axis of 384,400 km.[29]
    3. Given the moons' respective periods of 0.55465 and 0.95 days, the actual ratios are 2.92:5.00.[29]

    References
    1. "Planetary Satellite Discovery Circumstances". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 28 October 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2020.
    2. "Hippocamp". Lexico UK Dictionary. Oxford University Press.
    3. Anon. (1899) "Invocation to Neptune", Poems, New York, p. 84
    4. Brozović, M.; Showalter, M. R.; Jacobson, R. A.; French, R. S.; Lissauer, J. J.; de Pater, I. (March 2020). "Orbits and resonances of the regular moons of Neptune". Icarus. 338 (113462). arXiv:1910.13612. Bibcode:2020Icar..33813462B. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113462.
    5. Showalter, M. R.; de Pater, I.; Lissauer, J. J.; French, R. S. (February 2019). "The seventh inner moon of Neptune". Nature. 566 (7744): 350–353. Bibcode:2019Natur.566..350S. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0909-9. PMC 6424524. PMID 30787452.CS1 maint: date and year (link)
    6. "Planetary Satellite Physical Parameters". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 19 February 2015. Retrieved 21 June 2020.
    7. "New Satellite of Neptune: S/2004 N 1" (PDF). Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams. International Astronomical Union. 15 July 2013. Bibcode:2013CBET.3586....1S. Retrieved 21 June 2020.
    8. "Hubble Finds New Neptune Moon". HubbleSite. Space Telescope Science Institute. 15 July 2013. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
    9. Grossman, Lisa (15 July 2013). "Neptune's strange new moon is first found in a decade". NewScientist. Retrieved 18 July 2013.
    10. Beatty, Kelly (15 July 2013). "Neptune's Newest Moon". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved 12 June 2017.
    11. Showalter, Mark (15 July 2013). "How to Photograph a Racehorse …and how this relates to a tiny moon of Neptune". Cosmic Diary. Retrieved 16 July 2013.
    12. "Hubble helps uncover origin of Neptune's smallest moon Hippocamp". Spacetelescope.org. European Space Agency. 20 February 2019. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
    13. "Planet and Satellite Names and Discoverers". Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. USGS Astrogeology Science Center. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    14. Showalter, Mark (October 2015). "Neptune's Evolving Inner Moons and Ring-Arcs". Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes. Space Telescope Science Institute. Bibcode:2015hst..prop14217S. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
    15. "M.P.C. 111804" (PDF). Minor Planet Circular. Minor Planet Center. 25 September 2018. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
    16. "Tiny Neptune Moon Spotted by Hubble May Have Broken from Larger Moon". HubbleSite. Space Telescope Science Institute. 20 February 2019. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    17. Billings, Lee (18 July 2013). "Neptune's New Moon May Be Named after One of Sea God's Monstrous Children". Scientific American. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
    18. Beatty, Kelly (20 February 2019). "Meet Hippocamp, Neptune's Smallest Moon". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
    19. "Name Approved for Neptunian Satellite: Hippocamp". Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. USGS Astrogeology Science Center. 20 February 2019. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    20. Goldreich, P.; Murray, N.; Longaretti, P. Y.; Banfield, D. (August 1989). "Neptune's Story". Science. 245 (4917): 500–504. Bibcode:1989Sci...245..500G. doi:10.1126/science.245.4917.500. PMID 17750259.
    21. Agnor, Craig B.; Hamilton, Douglas P. (May 2006). "Neptune's capture of its moon Triton in a binary–planet gravitational encounter". Nature. 441 (7090): 192–194. Bibcode:2006Natur.441..192A. doi:10.1038/nature04792. PMID 16688170.
    22. Banfield, Don; Murray, Norm (October 1992). "A dynamical history of the inner Neptunian satellites". Icarus. 99 (2): 390–401. Bibcode:1992Icar...99..390B. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90155-Z.
    23. Croft, Steven K. (October 1992). "Proteus: Geology, shape, and catastrophic destruction". Icarus. 99 (2): 402–419. Bibcode:1992Icar...99..402C. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90156-2.
    24. Verbiscer, Anne J. (20 February 2019). "A new moon for Neptune". Nature. 566 (7744): 328–329. Bibcode:2019Natur.566..328V. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00576-1. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    25. Haynes, Korey (20 February 2019). "Meet Neptune's new moon, Hippocamp". Astronomy Magazine. Retrieved 22 June 2020.
    26. Karkoschka, Erich (April 2003). "Sizes, shapes, and albedos of the inner satellites of Neptune". Icarus. 162 (2): 400–407. Bibcode:2003Icar..162..400K. doi:10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00002-2.
    27. Dumas, C.; Terrile, R. J.; Smith, B. A.; Schneider, G. (March 2002). "Astrometry and Near-Infrared Photometry of Neptune's Inner Satellites and Ring Arcs". The Astronomical Journal. 123 (3): 1776–1783. Bibcode:2002AJ....123.1776D. doi:10.1086/339022. ISSN 0004-6256.
    28. Dumas, C.; Smith, B. A.; Terrile, R. J. (August 2003). "Hubble Space Telescope NICMOS Multiband Photometry of Proteus and Puck". The Astronomical Journal. 126 (2): 1080–1085. Bibcode:2003AJ....126.1080D. doi:10.1086/375909. ISSN 0004-6256.
    29. "Planetary Satellite Mean Orbital Parameters". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 17 July 2020. Retrieved 21 July 2020.
    30. Zhang, K.; Hamilton, D. P. (January 2008). "Orbital resonances in the inner neptunian system: II. Resonant history of Proteus, Larissa, Galatea, and Despina". Icarus. 193 (1): 267–282. Bibcode:2008Icar..193..267Z. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.08.024. ISSN 0019-1035.
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.