Life on Venus

The possibility of life on Venus is a subject of interest in astrobiology due to its proximity and similarities to Earth. To date, no definitive proof has been found of past or present life on Venus. Theories have decreased significantly since the early 1960s, when spacecraft began studying the planet and it became clear that its environment is extreme compared to Earth's. However, there is ongoing study as to whether life could have existed on the Venusian surface before a runaway greenhouse effect took hold, and related study as to whether a relict biosphere could persist high in the modern Venusian atmosphere.

The atmosphere of Venus as viewed in ultraviolet by the Pioneer Venus Orbiter in 1979. The cause of the dark streaks in the clouds isn't yet known.
This article is one of a series on:
Life in the Universe
Astrobiology
Habitability in the Solar System
Life outside the Solar System

With extreme surface temperatures reaching nearly 735 K (462 °C; 863 °F) and an atmospheric pressure 90 times that of Earth, the conditions on Venus make water-based life as we know it unlikely on the surface of the planet. However, a few scientists have speculated that thermoacidophilic extremophile microorganisms might exist in the temperate, acidic upper layers of the Venusian atmosphere.[1][2][3] In September 2020, research was published that reported the presence of phosphine in the planet's atmosphere, a potential biosignature.[4][5][6] However, doubts have been cast on these observations.[7][8]

As of 8 February 2021, an updated status of studies considering the possible detection of lifeforms on Venus (via of phosphine) and Mars (via methane) was reported.[9]

Surface conditions
Main article: Observations and explorations of Venus
Venus

Because Venus is completely covered in clouds, human knowledge of surface conditions was largely speculative until the space probe era. Until the mid-20th century, the surface environment of Venus was believed to be similar to Earth, hence it was widely believed that Venus could harbor life. In 1870, the British astronomer Richard A. Proctor said the existence of life on Venus was impossible near its equator,[10] but possible near its poles. Science fiction writers were free to imagine what Venus might be like until the 1960s; see Venus in fiction. Among the speculations on Venus were that it had a jungle-like environment or that it had oceans of either petroleum or carbonated water.

However, microwave observations published by C. Mayer et al.[11] in 1958 indicated a high-temperature source (600 K). Strangely, millimetre-band observations made by A. D. Kuzmin indicated much lower temperatures.[12] Two competing theories explained the unusual radio spectrum, one suggesting the high temperatures originated in the ionosphere, and another suggesting a hot planetary surface.

In 1962, Mariner 2, the first successful mission to Venus, measured the planet's temperature for the first time, and found it to be "about 500 degrees Celsius (900 degrees Fahrenheit)."[13] Since then, increasingly clear evidence from various space probes showed Venus has an extreme climate, with a greenhouse effect generating a constant temperature of about 500 °C (932 °F) on the surface. The atmosphere contains sulfuric acid clouds. In 1968, NASA reported that air pressure on the Venusian surface was 75 to 100 times that of Earth.[14] This was later revised to 92 bars,[15] almost 100 times that of Earth and similar to that of more than 1,000 m (3,300 ft) deep in Earth's oceans. In such an environment, and given the hostile characteristics of the Venusian weather, life as we know it is highly unlikely to occur.

Venera 9 returned the first image from the surface of another planet in 1975.[16]

Past habitability potential

Scientists have speculated that if liquid water existed on its surface before the runaway greenhouse effect heated the planet, microbial life may have formed on Venus, but it may no longer exist.[17] Assuming the process that delivered water to Earth was common to all the planets near the habitable zone, it has been estimated that liquid water could have existed on its surface for up to 600 million years during and shortly after the Late Heavy Bombardment, which could be enough time for simple life to form, but this figure can vary from as little as a few million years to as much as a few billion.[18][19][20][21][22] Recent studies from September 2019 concluded that Venus may have had surface water and a habitable condition for around 3 billion years and may have been in this condition until 700 to 750 million years ago. If correct, this would have been an ample amount of time for the formation of life,[23] and for microbial life to evolve to become aerial.[24]

There has been very little analysis of Venusian surface material, so it is possible that evidence of past life, if it ever existed, could be found with a probe capable of enduring Venus's current extreme surface conditions,[25][26] although the resurfacing of the planet in the past 500 million years[27] means that it is unlikely that ancient surface rocks remain, especially those containing the mineral tremolite which, theoretically, could have encased some biosignatures.[26]

Suggested panspermia events

It has been speculated that life on Venus may have come to Earth through panspermia. "Current models indicate that Venus may have been habitable. Complex life may have evolved on the highly irradiated Venus, and transferred to Earth on asteroids. This model fits the pattern of pulses of highly developed life appearing, diversifying and going extinct with astonishing rapidity through the Cambrian and Ordovician periods, and also explains the extraordinary genetic variety which appeared over this period."[28]

Cataclysmic events

Between 700 and 750 million years ago, a near-global resurfacing event triggered the release of carbon dioxide from rock on the planet, which transformed its climate.[29] In addition, according to a study from researchers at the University of California, Riverside, Venus would be able to support life if Jupiter didn't alter its orbit around the Sun.[30]

Present habitability of its atmosphere

Atmospheric conditions

Although there is little possibility of existing life near the surface of Venus, the altitudes about 50 km (31 mi) above the surface have a mild temperature, and hence there are still some opinions in favor of such a possibility in the atmosphere of Venus.[31][32] The idea was first brought forward by German physicist Heinz Haber in 1950.[33] In September 1967, Carl Sagan and Harold Morowitz published an analysis of the issue of life on Venus in the journal Nature.[25]

In the analysis of mission data from the Venera, Pioneer Venus and Magellan missions, it was discovered that carbonyl sulfide, hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide were present together in the upper atmosphere. Venera also detected large amounts of toxic chlorine just below the Venusian cloud cover.[34] Carbonyl sulfide is difficult to produce inorganically,[32] but it can be produced by volcanism.[35] Sulfuric acid is produced in the upper atmosphere by the Sun's photochemical action on carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and water vapor.[36] The re-analysys of Pioneer Venus data in 2020 has found part of chlorine and all of hydrogen sulfide spectral features are instead phosphine-related, meaning lower than thought concentration of chlorine and non-detection of hydrogen sulfide.[37]

Solar radiation constrains the atmospheric habitable zone to between 51 km (65 °C) and 62 km (−20 °C) altitude, within the acidic clouds.[3] It has been speculated that clouds in the atmosphere of Venus could contain chemicals that can initiate forms of biological activity.[38][39]

Unknown absorbers

It has been speculated that any hypothetical microorganisms inhabiting the atmosphere, if present, could employ ultraviolet light (UV) emitted by the Sun as an energy source, which could be an explanation for the dark lines (called "unknown UV absorber") observed in the UV photographs of Venus.[40][41] The existence of this "unknown UV absorber" prompted Carl Sagan to publish an article in 1963 proposing the hypothesis of microorganisms in the upper atmosphere as the agent absorbing the UV light.[42]

In August 2019, astronomers reported a newly discovered long-term pattern of UV light absorbance and albedo changes in the atmosphere of Venus and its weather, that is caused by "unknown absorbers" that may include unknown chemicals or even large colonies of microorganisms high up in the atmosphere.[43][44]

In January 2020, astronomers reported evidence that suggests Venus is currently (within 2.5 million years from present) volcanically active, and the residue from such activity may be a potential source of nutrients for possible microorganisms in the Venusian atmosphere.[45][46][47]

Phosphine

Research published in September 2020 indicated the detection of phosphine (PH3) in Venus's atmosphere by ALMA telescope that was not linked to any known abiotic method of production present or possible under Venusian conditions.[4][5][6] A molecule like phosphine is not expected to persist in the Venusian atmosphere since, under the ultraviolet radiation, it will eventually react with water and carbon dioxide. PH3 is associated with anaerobic ecosystems on Earth, and may indicate life on anoxic planets.[48] Related studies suggested that the detected concentration of phosphine (20 ppb) in the clouds of Venus indicated a "plausible amount of life," and further, that the typical predicted biomass densities were "several orders of magnitude lower than the average biomass density of Earth’s aerial biosphere.”[49][50] As of 2019, no known abiotic process generates phosphine gas on terrestrial planets (as opposed to gas giants[51]) in appreciable quantities. The phosphine can be generated by geological process of weathering an olivine lavas containing inorganic phosphides, but this process requires an ongoing and massive volcanic activity.[52] Therefore, detectable amounts of phosphine could indicate life.[53][54]

In a statement published on October 5, 2020 on the website of the International Astronomical Union's commission F3 on astrobiology, the authors of the September 2020 paper about phosphine were accused of unethical behaviour and criticized for being unscientific and misleading the public.[55] Members of that commission have since distanced themselves from the IAU statement, claiming that it had been published without their knowledge or approval.[56][57] The statement was removed from the IAU website shortly thereafter. The IAU's media contact Lars Lindberg Christensen stated that IAU did not agree with the content of the letter, and that it had been published by a group within the F3 commission, not IAU itself.[58]

Despite controversies, NASA is in the beginning stages of sending a future mission to Venus. The Venus Emissivity, Radio Science, InSAR, Topography, and Spectroscopy mission (VERITAS) would carry radar to view through the clouds to get new images of the surface, of much higher quality than those last photographed thirty-one years ago. The other, Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble gases, Chemistry, and Imaging Plus (DAVINCI+) would actually go through the atmosphere, sampling the air as it descends, to hopefully detect the phosphine. [59] [60] Decisions on which mission will be continued is due to take place April, 2021.

BepiColombo, launched in 2018 to study Mercury, flew by Venus on October 15, 2020 and will perform a second flyby on August 10, 2021. Johannes Benkhoff, project scientist, believes BepiColombo's MERTIS (Mercury Radiometer and Thermal Infrared Spectrometer) could possibly detect phosphine, but "we do not know if our instrument is sensitive enough".[61]

Re-analysis of the in situ data gathered by Pioneer Venus Multiprobe in 1978 has also revealed the presence of phosphine and its dissociation products in the atmosphere of Venus.[37]

The phosphine signal was also detected in data collected using the JCMT, though much weaker than that found using ALMA.[7]

In October 2020, a reanalysis of archived infrared spectrum measurement in 2015 did not reveal any phosphine in the Venusian atmosphere, placing an upper limit of phosphine volume concentration 5 parts per billion (a quarter of value measured in radio band in 2020).[62] However, the wavelength used in these observations (10 microns) would only have detected phosphine at the very top of the clouds of the atmosphere of Venus.[7]

By late October 2020, the review of data processing of the data collected by both ALMA used in original publication of September 2020, and later JCMT data, has revealed background interpolation errors resulting in multiple spurious lines, including the spectral feature of phosphine. Re-analysis of data with a proper subtraction of background either does not result in the detection of the phosphine[63][64][65] or detects it with concentration of 1ppb, 20 times below original estimate.[66]

Example PH3 spectrum, from the circled region superimposed on the continuum image based on a re-analysis of the re-processed data.[67]

On 16 November 2020 ALMA staff released a corrected version of the data used by the scientists of the original study published on 14 September. On the same day, authors of this study published a re-analysis as a preprint using the new data that concludes the planet-averaged PH3 abundance to be ~7 times lower than what they detected with data of the previous ALMA processing, to likely vary by location and to be reconcilable with the JCMT detection of ~20 times this abundance if it varies substantially in time. They also respond to points raised in a critical study by Villanueva et al. that challenged their conclusions and find that so far the presence of no other compound can explain the data.[68][69][70][67] The authors reported that more advanced processing of the JCMT data was ongoing.[67] ALMA is reported to be expected to restart in early 2021 after a year-long shutdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic and may enable further observations that could provide insights for the ongoing investigation.[70]

According to new research announced in January 2021, the spectral line at 266.94 GHz attributed to phosphine in the clouds of Venus was more likely to have been produced by sulfur dioxide in the mesosphere.[71]

See also
Possible life on other bodies of the Solar System

References
  1. Clark, Stuart (26 September 2003). "Acidic clouds of Venus could harbour life". New Scientist. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
  2. Redfern, Martin (25 May 2004). "Venus clouds 'might harbour life'". BBC News. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
  3. Dartnell, Lewis R.; Nordheim, Tom Andre; Patel, Manish R.; Mason, Jonathon P.; et al. (September 2015). "Constraints on a potential aerial biosphere on Venus: I. Cosmic rays". Icarus. 257: 396–405. Bibcode:2015Icar..257..396D. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.05.006.
  4. Drake, Nadia (14 September 2020). "Possible sign of life on Venus stirs up heated debate". National Geographic. Retrieved 14 September 2020.
  5. Greaves, Jane S.; et al. (14 September 2020). "Phosphine gas in the cloud decks of Venus". Nature Astronomy. arXiv:2009.06593. Bibcode:2020NatAs.tmp..178G. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1174-4. Retrieved 14 September 2020.
  6. Stirone, Shannon; Chang, Kenneth; Overbye, Dennis (14 September 2020). "Life on Venus? Astronomers See a Signal in Its Clouds - The detection of a gas in the planet's atmosphere could turn scientists' gaze to a planet long overlooked in the search for extraterrestrial life". The New York Times. Retrieved 14 September 2020.
  7. Plait, Phil. "Update: Life Above Hell? Serious Doubt Cast on Venus Phosphine Finding". Retrieved 26 October 2020.
  8. "Purported phosphine on Venus more likely to be ordinary sulfur dioxide". ScienceDaily. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
  9. Chang, Kenneth; Stirone, Shannon (8 February 2021). "Life on Venus? The Picture Gets Cloudier - Despite doubts from many scientists, a team of researchers who said they had detected an unusual gas in the planet's atmosphere were still confident of their findings". The New York Times. Retrieved 8 February 2021.
  10. Proctor, Richard A., Other Worlds Than Ours: The Plurality of Worlds Studied Under the Light of Recent Scientific Researches. New York : J.A. Hill and Co., 1870. s. 94.
  11. Mayer, C. H.; McCollough, T. P.; Sloanaker, R. M. (1958). "Observations of Venus at 3.15-CM Wave Length". Astrophysical Journal. 127: 1–9. Bibcode:1958ApJ...127....1M. doi:10.1086/146433.
  12. Kuz'min, A. D.; Marov, M. Y. (1 June 1975). "Fizika Planety Venera" [Physics of the Planet Venus]. "Nauka" Press. p. 46. Retrieved 19 September 2020. The lack of evidence that the Venusian atmosphere is transparent at 3 cm wavelength range, the difficulty of explaining such a high surface temperature, and a much lower brightness temperature measured by Kuz'min and Salmonovich [80, 81] and Gibson [310] at a shorter wavelength of 8 mm all provided a basis for a different interpretation of the radio astronomy measurement results offered by Jones [366].
  13. Administrator, NASA Content (6 March 2015). "Mariner 2". NASA.
  14. "Venus Air Pressure". NASA/JPL.
  15. "Venus Fact Sheet". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov.
  16. "Venera 9's landing site". The Planetary Society. Retrieved 16 September 2020.
  17. Bruce Dorminey, "Venus Likely Had Past Life; Next Step Is Finding It", Forbes, 28 March 2016.
  18. "Was Venus once a habitable planet?". European Space Agency. 24 June 2010. Retrieved 22 May 2016.
  19. Nancy Atkinson (24 June 2010). "Was Venus once a waterworld?". Universe Today. Retrieved 22 May 2016.
  20. Henry Bortman (26 August 2004). "Was Venus Alive? 'The Signs are Probably There'". Space.com. Retrieved 22 May 2016.
  21. "NASA Climate Modeling Suggests Venus May Have Been Habitable". NASA.gov. NASA. 11 August 2016. Retrieved 15 August 2016.
  22. Michael J. Way (2 August 2016). "Was Venus the First Habitable World of our Solar System?'". Geophysical Research Letters. 43 (16): 8376–8383. arXiv:1608.00706. Bibcode:2016GeoRL..43.8376W. doi:10.1002/2016GL069790. PMC 5385710. PMID 28408771.
  23. "Venus May Have Been Habitable for Three Billion Years | Planetary Science | Sci-News.com". Breaking Science News | Sci-News.com. Retrieved 24 September 2019.
  24. "Did the Early Venus Harbor Life? (Weekend Feature)". The Daily Galaxy. 2 June 2012. Archived from the original on 28 October 2017. Retrieved 22 May 2016.
  25. Morowitz, Harold (2011). "Life on Venus". Astrobiology. 11 (9): 931–932. Bibcode:2011AsBio..11..931M. doi:10.1089/ast.2011.9270. PMID 22059693 – via Academic OneFile.
  26. David Shiga (10 October 2007). "Did Venus's ancient oceans incubate life?". New Scientist. Retrieved 22 May 2016.
  27. Strom, Robert G.; Schaber, Gerald G.; Dawson, Douglas D. (25 May 1994). "The global resurfacing of Venus". Journal of Geophysical Research. 99 (E5): 10899–10926. Bibcode:1994JGR....9910899S. doi:10.1029/94JE00388.
  28. Cartwright, Annabel (2016). "The Venus Hypothesis". arXiv:1608.03074 [astro-ph.EP].
  29. "Venus was potentially habitable until a mysterious event happened". CNN. 20 September 2019.
  30. "Venus isn't habitable -- and it could be all Jupiter's fault". CNN. 1 October 2020.
  31. Venus as a Natural Laboratory for Search of Life in High Temperature Conditions: Events on the Planet on March 1, 1982 Archived 7 November 2015 at the Wayback Machine, L. V. Ksanfomality, published in Astronomicheskii Vestnik, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2012 Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine.
  32. Landis, Geoffrey A. (2003). "Astrobiology: the Case for Venus" (PDF). Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 56 (7/8): 250–254. Bibcode:2003JBIS...56..250L. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2011.
  33. Fritz Haber (October 1950). "Epitome of Space Medicine". Defense Technical Information Center.
  34. David Harry Grinspoon (1997). Venus Revealed: A New Look Below the Clouds of Our Mysterious Twin Planet. Addison-Wesley Pub. ISBN 978-0-201-40655-9.
  35. Seinfeld, J. (2006). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. London: J. Wiley. ISBN 978-1-60119-595-1.
  36. "Venus Express: Acid clouds and lightning". European Space Agency (ESA). Retrieved 8 September 2016.
  37. Mogul, Rakesh; Limaye, Sanjay S.; Way, M. J.; Cordova, Jr, Jamie A. (2020), Is Phosphine in the Mass Spectra from Venus' Clouds?, arXiv:2009.12758
  38. David, Leonard (11 February 2003). "Life Zone on Venus Possible". Space.com. Archived from the original on 16 February 2003. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
  39. Schulze-Makuch, Dirk; Grinspoon, David H.; Abbas, Ousama; Irwin, Louis N.; Bullock, Mark A. (March 2004). "A Sulfur-Based Survival Strategy for Putative Phototrophic Life in the Venusian Atmosphere". Astrobiology. 4 (1): 11–18. Bibcode:2004AsBio...4...11S. doi:10.1089/153110704773600203. PMID 15104900.
  40. Schulze-Makuch, Dirk; Irwin, Louis N. (5 July 2004). "Reassessing the Possibility of Life on Venus: Proposal for an Astrobiology Mission". Astrobiology. 2 (2): 197–202. Bibcode:2002AsBio...2..197S. doi:10.1089/15311070260192264. PMID 12469368.
  41. "Could Dark Streaks in Venus' Clouds Be Microbial Life?". astrobiology.nasa.gov. 1 February 2017.
  42. Erica Naone (29 August 2019). "Mysterious dark patches in Venus' clouds are affecting the weather there". astronomy.com.
  43. Anderson, Paul (3 September 2019). "Could microbes be affecting Venus' climate? – Unusual dark patches in Venus' atmosphere – called "unknown absorbers" – play a key role in the planet's climate and albedo, according to a new study. But what are they? That's still a mystery". Earth & Sky. Retrieved 3 September 2019.
  44. Lee, Yeon Joo; et al. (26 August 2019). "Long-term Variations of Venus's 365 nm Albedo Observed by Venus Express, Akatsuki, MESSENGER, and the Hubble Space Telescope". The Astronomical Journal. 158 (3): 126–152. arXiv:1907.09683. Bibcode:2019AJ....158..126L. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab3120. S2CID 198179774.
  45. Hall, Sannon (9 January 2020). "Volcanoes on Venus Might Still Be Smoking - Planetary science experiments on Earth suggest that the sun's second planet might have ongoing volcanic activity". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
  46. Filiberto, Justin (3 January 2020). "Present-day volcanism on Venus as evidenced from weathering rates of olivine". Science. 6 (1): eaax7445. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.7445F. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax7445. PMC 6941908. PMID 31922004.
  47. Limaye, Sanjay S. (12 September 2018). "Venus' Spectral Signatures and the Potential for Life in the Clouds". Astrobiology. 18 (9): 1181–1198. Bibcode:2018AsBio..18.1181L. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1783. PMC 6150942. PMID 29600875.
  48. Steller, Luke; Kranendonk, Martin Van (26 September 2020). "Experts Explain: If There Is Life on Venus, How Could It Have Got There?". SciTechDaily.com. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
  49. Cimone, Matthew (20 September 2020). "How Much Life Would Be Required to Create the Phosphine Signal on Venus?". Universe Today. Retrieved 22 September 2020.
  50. Lingam, Manasvi; Loeb, Abraham (17 September 2020). "On The Biomass Required To Produce Phosphine Detected In The Cloud Decks OfVenus". arXiv:2009.07835v1 [astro-ph.EP].
  51. Fletcher, LN; Orton, GS; Teanby, NA; Irwin, PGJ (2009). "Phosphine on Jupiter and Saturn from Cassini/CIRS". Icarus. 202 (2): 543–564. Bibcode:2009Icar..202..543F. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2009.03.023.
  52. Truong, Ngoc; Lunine, Jonathan I. (2020), Hypothesis Perspectives: Might active volcanisms today contribute to the presence of phosphine in Venus's atmosphere?, arXiv:2009.11904v2
  53. Sousa-Silva, Clara; Seager, Sara; Ranjan, Sukrit; Petkowski, Janusz Jurand; Zhan, Zhuchang; Hu, Renyu; Bains, William (11 October 2019). "Phosphine as a Biosignature Gas in Exoplanet Atmospheres". Astrobiology (published February 2020). 20 (2): 235–268. arXiv:1910.05224. Bibcode:2020AsBio..20..235S. doi:10.1089/ast.2018.1954. PMID 31755740. S2CID 204401807.
  54. "Phosphine Could Signal Existence of Alien Anaerobic Life on Rocky Planets". Sci-News. 26 December 2019.
  55. "Statement from Commission F3 (Astrobiology) of the IAU on Press Reports regarding Detection of Phosphine in Venus" (PDF). www.iau.org. International Astronomical Union - Commission F3 Astrobiology. 5 October 2020. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2020.
  56. @Mike_Garrett (7 October 2020). "Absolutely shocked & dismayed by this statement from the @IAU_org - as a member of IAU Com F3, I completely disagree - this is how science progresses" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  57. @ExoCytherean (7 October 2020). "I'm also a member of F3 and I didn't even know about the letter until it was published this morning. How on Earth is the commission publishing statements that claim to represent its membership when they are not even consulted?" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  58. Amitabh Sinha (8 October 2020). "Discovery that indicated possibility of extra-terrestrial life attacked by group of astrobiologists". indianexpress.com. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  59. Byrne, Paul. "The detection of phosphine in Venus' clouds is a big deal – here's how we can find out if it's a sign of life". The Conversation. Retrieved 18 September 2020.
  60. NASA Selects Four Possible Missions to Study the Secrets of the Solar System https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-selects-four-possible-missions-to-study-the-secrets-of-the-solar-system. Retrieved 23 February 2020. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  61. O'Callaghan, Jonathan (16 September 2020). "In A Complete Fluke, A European Spacecraft Is About To Fly Past Venus – And Could Look For Signs Of Life". Forbes. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
  62. Encrenaz, T.; Greathouse, T. K.; Marcq, E.; Widemann, T.; Bézard, B.; Fouchet, T.; Giles, R.; Sagawa, H.; Greaves, J.; Sousa-Silva, C. (2020), "A stringent upper limit of the PH3 abundance at the cloud top of Venus", Astronomy & Astrophysics, 643: L5, arXiv:2010.07817, Bibcode:2020A&A...643L...5E, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039559, S2CID 222377688
  63. Snellen, I. A. G.; Guzman-Ramirez, L.; Hogerheijde, M. R.; Hygate, A. P. S.; van der Tak, F. F. S. (2020), "Re-analysis of the 267-GHz ALMA observations of Venus No statistically significant detection of phosphine", Astronomy and Astrophysics, 644: L2, arXiv:2010.09761, Bibcode:2020A&A...644L...2S, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039717, S2CID 224803085
  64. Thompson, M. A. (2021), "The statistical reliability of 267 GHz JCMT observations of Venus: No significant evidence for phosphine absorption", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 501 (1): L18–L22, arXiv:2010.15188, Bibcode:2021MNRAS.501L..18T, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa187, S2CID 225103303
  65. Villanueva, Geronimo; Cordiner, Martin; Irwin, Patrick; Imke de Pater; Butler, Bryan; Gurwell, Mark; Milam, Stefanie; Nixon, Conor; Luszcz-Cook, Statia; Wilson, Colin; Kofman, Vincent; Liuzzi, Giuliano; Faggi, Sara; Fauchez, Thomas; Lippi, Manuela; Cosentino, Richard; Thelen, Alexander; Moullet, Arielle; Hartogh, Paul; Molter, Edward; Charnley, Steve; Arney, Giada; Mandell, Avi; Biver, Nicolas; Vandaele, Ann; Katherine de Kleer; Kopparapu, Ravi (2020), No phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus, arXiv:2010.14305
  66. Greaves, Jane S.; Richards, Anita M. S.; Bains, William; Rimmer, Paul B.; Clements, David L.; Seager, Sara; Petkowski, Janusz J.; Sousa-Silva, Clara; Ranjan, Sukrit; Fraser, Helen J. (2020), Re-analysis of Phosphine in Venus' Clouds, arXiv:2011.08176
  67. Greaves, Jane S.; Richards, Anita M. S.; Bains, William; Rimmer, Paul B.; Clements, David L.; Seager, Sara; Petkowski, Janusz J.; Sousa-Silva, Clara; Ranjan, Sukrit; Fraser, Helen J. (16 November 2020). "Re-analysis of Phosphine in Venus' Clouds". arXiv:2011.08176 [astro-ph.EP]. Available under CC BY 4.0.
  68. Witze, Alexandra (17 November 2020). "Prospects for life on Venus fade — but aren't dead yet". Nature. p. 532. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03258-5. Retrieved 9 December 2020.
  69. Chan, Athena (18 November 2020). "Life On Venus: Phosphine Signals Actually Fainter As Scientists Re-Analyze Earlier Findings". International Business Times. Retrieved 9 December 2020.
  70. Voosen, Paul (17 November 2020). "Potential signs of life on Venus are fading as astronomers downgrade their original claims". Science | AAAS. Retrieved 9 December 2020.
  71. Lincowski, Andrew P.; Meadows, Victoria S.; Crisp, David; Akins, Alex B.; Schwieterman, Edward W.; Arney, Giada N.; Wong, Michael L.; Steffes, Paul G.; Parenteau, M. Niki; Domagal-Goldman, Shawn (24 January 2021). "Claimed detection of PH3 in the clouds of Venus is consistent with mesospheric SO2". arXiv:2101.09837 [astro-ph].
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.