Nabucco pipeline

The Nabucco pipeline (also referred as Turkey–Austria gas pipeline) was a project of the natural gas pipeline from Erzurum in Turkey to Baumgarten an der March in Austria to diversify natural gas suppliers and delivery routes for Europe. The pipeline was to lessen European dependence on Russian energy. The project was backed by several European Union states and the United States and was seen as rival to the Gazprom-Eni South Stream pipeline project. The main supplier was to be Iraq with potential supplies from Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Egypt.[1]

Nabucco pipeline
Proposed location of the Nabucco pipeline
Location
CountryTurkey, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Austria
General directioneast–west
FromAhiboz, Turkey
Passes throughİnegöl, Yuluce, Kırklareli, Kofcas, Lozenets, Oryahovo, Port of Bechet, Nădlac, Dolj, Mehedinti, Caras-Severin, Timiș, and Arad
ToBaumgarten an der March, Austria
General information
TypeNatural gas
PartnersOMV
MOL
Transgaz
Bulgargaz
BOTAŞ
RWE
OperatorNabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH
Technical information
Length3,893 km (2,419 mi)
Maximum discharge31 billion cubic metres (1.1×10^12 cu ft) per year
Diameter56 in (1,422 mm)
Nabucco-West
Map of Nabucco-West
Location
CountryBulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Austria
General directioneast–west
FromStrandzha, Bulgaria
Passes throughLozenets, Oryahovo, Port of Bechet, Nădlac, Dolj, Mehedinti, Caras-Severin, Timiș, and Arad
ToBaumgarten an der March, Austria
General information
TypeNatural gas
PartnersBOTAŞ (Turkey)
BEH (Bulgaria)
FGSZ (Hungary)
OMV (Austria)
Transgaz (Romania)
OperatorNabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH
Expected2018
Technical information
Length1,329 km (826 mi)
Maximum discharge10 to 23 billion cubic metres per year
Diameter48 in (1,219 mm)

The project was developed by a consortium of six companies. Preparations started in 2002 and the intergovernmental agreement between Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Austria was signed on 13 July 2009. After an announcement of the construction of TANAP, the consortium submitted the Nabucco-West project, which was to run from the Turkish-Bulgarian border to Austria.[2][3] It was a modification of the original Nabucco Pipeline project. The main supply for the Nabucco West was to be Shah Deniz gas through the proposed Trans-Anatolian gas pipeline (TANAP).[4] After Shah Deniz consortium decision to prefer the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline over Nabucco, the Nabucco pipeline plan was finally aborted in June 2013.[5]

Motivation
Main article: Russia in the European energy sector

The Nabucco project was backed by the European Union and the United States.[6][7][8][9] In the Trans-European Networks - Energy (TEN - E) programme, the Nabucco pipeline is designated as a project of strategic importance.[10][11][12] An objective of the project is to connect the European Union better to the natural gas sources in the Caspian Sea and the Middle East regions.[13][14][15] The project has been driven by the intention to diversify its current energy supplies, and to lessen European dependence on Russian energy—the biggest supplier of gas to Europe.[16][17] The Russia–Ukraine gas disputes have been one of the factors driving the search for alternative suppliers, sources, and routes.[17][18] Moreover, as per the European Commission, Europe's gas consumption is expected to increase from 502 billion cubic meters, in 2005, to 815 billion cubic meters in 2030, which would mean Russia alone would not be able to meet the demand.[19]

South Eastern Europe is important as many of the regions are heavily dependent on Russian gas imports. Nabucco aims to diversify the gas supply to increase competition and security. Simon Pirani, senior research fellow, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies presented to delegates at the Ukrainian Energy Forum in 2013 a list of prices from the Russian newspaper Izvestia: "What they show is the prices at which Russian gas is being purchased in different European countries, and this tells quite a simple story. If you're in Eastern Europe, and you are quite heavily dependent on Russian gas, you pay more than $500/TCM; if you're in the UK, where we have a pretty much complete domination of gas-to-gas market, you pay $300, or $370+ in Germany, which is somewhere in between."[20]

History

Preparations for the Nabucco project started in February 2002 when first talks took place between Austrian OMV and Turkish BOTAŞ. In June 2002, five companies (OMV of Austria, MOL Group of Hungary, Bulgargaz of Bulgaria, Transgaz of Romania and BOTAŞ of Turkey) signed a protocol of intention to construct the Nabucco pipeline. The protocol followed by the cooperation agreement in October 2002. The name Nabucco comes from the same famous opera of Giuseppe Verdi, that the five partners had listened to at the Vienna State Opera after this meeting.[21] In December 2003, the European Commission awarded a grant in the amount of 50% of the estimated total eligible cost of the feasibility study including market analysis, and technical, economic and financial studies. On 28 June 2005, the joint venture agreement was signed by five Nabucco partners. The ministerial statement on the Nabucco pipeline was signed on 26 June 2006 in Vienna.[22] On 12 September 2007, Jozias van Aartsen was nominated by the European Commission as the Nabucco project coordinator.[23] In February 2008, German RWE became a shareholder of the consortium.[24] [25]

On 11 June 2008, the first contract to supply gas from Azerbaijan through the Nabucco pipeline to Bulgaria was signed.[26] The President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev confirmed on 29 January 2009, that Azerbaijan was planning to at least double its gas production in the coming five years to supply the pipeline.[27] On 12 April 2009, the Minister of Energy of Turkey Hilmi Güler confirmed that Turkey is ready to sign a deal, provided that Turkey gets 15% of the natural gas to be carried through the Nabucco pipeline.[28]

On 27 January 2009, the Nabucco Summit held in Budapest.[29] On 24–25 April 2009, the Nabucco pipeline was discussed, among other energy issues, at the high-level energy summit in Sofia,[30] and on 8 May 2009, at the Southern Corridor Summit in Prague.[31]

The intergovernmental agreement between Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Austria was signed by five prime ministers on 13 July 2009 in Ankara.[32] The European Union was represented at the ceremony by the President Jose Manuel Barroso and the Commissioner for Energy Andris Piebalgs, and the United States was represented by Special Envoy for Eurasian Energy Richard Morningstar and Ranking Member of the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Senator Richard Lugar.[33][34] Hungary ratified the agreement on 20 October 2009.[35] Bulgaria ratified the agreement on 3 February 2010.[12][36] Romania ratified the agreement on 16 February 2010.[25][37] Turkey became the final country ratifying the agreement on 4 March 2010.[38][39]

The legal framework set up by the intergovernmental agreement was strengthened further with the signing in 2011 of the Project Support Agreements (PSAs) between Nabucco and each of the Transit countries. The main elements of the PSAs are the affirmation of an advantageous regulatory transit regime under EU law; the protection of the Nabucco Pipeline from potential discriminatory changes in the law; and support for legislative and administrative actions for the further implementation of the project.[40]

In May 2012, the Nabucco consortium submitted a Nabucco-West proposal to the Shah Deniz consortium.[2] On 10 January 2013, Nabucco International and Shah Deniz partners signed a funding agreement. According to the agreement, Shah Deniz partners will take a 50% stake in the project if chosen as an export route for the Shah Deniz gas.[41] On 3 March 2013, Nabucco International signed a memorandum of understanding with the TANAP consortium.[42] However, on 28 June 2013 Shah Deniz consortium announced that it had chosen the Trans Adriatic Pipeline over Nabucco for its gas exports,[43] prompting OMV CEO Gerhard Roiss to regard the Nabucco project as "over".[44]

Route

The original 3,893 kilometres (2,419 mi) long pipeline was to run from Ahiboz in Turkey via Bulgaria, Romania, and Hungary to Baumgarten an der March, a major natural gas hub in Austria.[45] In Ahiboz, it would be joined with two feeder lines, one connecting to Georgia in the north (South Caucasus Pipeline), and the other connecting to Iraq (pipeline to be built) in the southeast.[46] It would be fed also from the Tabriz–Ankara pipeline. 2,730 kilometres (1,700 mi) of the pipeline was to be laid in Turkey, 412 kilometres (256 mi) in Bulgaria, 469 kilometres (291 mi) in Romania, 384 kilometres (239 mi) in Hungary, and 47 kilometres (29 mi) in Austria.[45]

The modified Nabucco West was to start from the Turkey–Bulgaria border and further to follow the original route. The total length of Nabucco West is 1,329 kilometres (826 mi), with the following distances in each of the below countries:[45]

From Turkey, the original Nabucco pipeline was proposed to enter Bulgaria and after running 76 kilometres (47 mi) in parallel to the existing gas system connect to the Bulgarian national gas network at the compressor station of village Lozenets in Yambol Province.[47] After crossing the Balkan Range, the pipeline will head 116.3 kilometres (72.3 mi) in a northwesterly direction. After reaching the national northern half-ring, it will run 133 kilometres (83 mi) in parallel to the existing east–west gas line and continue 86.5 kilometres (53.7 mi) to northwest before reaching the Danube at Oryahovo. In Bulgaria, Nabucco will have interconnections with the national gas network and will have two off-take systems, compressor stations and pig stations.[48]

In Romania, the pipeline would be crossing into the country under the Danube. The route on the Romanian territory would go from south-west to north-west, its south-western starting point being located at the Danube-crossing point upstream the Port of Bechet, and the north-western end point being located north of Nădlac. The pipe would follow the south western border of Romania and will travel through the counties of Dolj, Mehedinti, Caras-Severin, Timiș, and Arad. The pipeline would cross 11 protected sites, two national parks, three natural reserves, and 57 watercourses, namely major rivers such as: Jiu, Coşuştea, Cerna, Bela Reca, Timiș, Bega, and Mureş, as well as their tributaries. The terrain is rockier in Romania and mainly composed of limestone. This section is 469 kilometres (291 mi) long.[45][49]

Polish gas company PGNiG was studying the possibility of building a link from the Nabucco gas pipeline to Poland.[50]

Technical features

The Nabucco-West was to be exempt from regulated third party access, including tariff regulation, for 25 years.[13][14][15] Its proposal stated a capacity of 10 billion cubic metres (350 billion cubic feet) per year.[2] This capacity will be scaled up to 23 billion cubic metres (810 billion cubic feet) to compensate for an anticipated increase in demand. Nabucco West would offer 50% of its transport capacity to third parties outside of the shareholders.[51][52]

Construction

The Nabucco project was included in the EU Trans-European Energy Network programme and a feasibility study for the Nabucco pipeline had been performed under an EU project grant. The front end engineering and design (FEED) services of the pipeline, including the overall management of the local FEED contractors, the review of the technical feasibility study, route confirmation, preparation of the design basis, hydraulic studies, overall SCADA and telecommunications, GIS and preparation of tender packages for the next phase, was managed by UK-based consultancy Penspen.[53] Starting from 14 December 2011, WorleyParsons was appointed as on owner's engineer.[54]

On 28 January 2013, it was announced that a re-feed for the Nabucco West project was being conducted by Saipem following the selection of the project as the Central European route by the Shah Deniz consortium in June last year. This work will build upon existing engineering work already completed for the Nabucco classic route.[55]

According to Reinhard Mitschek, managing director of Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH, construction of the pipeline was scheduled to begin in 2013 and would become operational by 2017.[25][56] [57] However, in June 2013, the Shah Deniz Consortium had chosen a rival project, Trans Adriatic Pipeline, that has a route Turkey–Greece-Albania-Italy,[58] and the future of Nabucco project is unclear.

Financing

The pipelines costs are undisclosed, however Reinhard Mitschek said in late 2012 that the costs of Nabucco West would be far lower than €7.9 billion previously suggested.[59] The final investment decision was expected in 2013. The sources of financing of the Nabucco project are not decided yet. As a commercial project, it will be financed 30% by the project's partners and the rest by commercial financial instruments. The European Commission has awarded an EU project grant in the amount of 50% of the estimated total eligible cost of the feasibility study[13][14][15] and has also decided to allocate €200 million from the European Economic Recovery Plan.[60] To receive this financing, this grant should be committed by the end 2010.[60]

At the Nabucco Summit held in Budapest on 27 January 2009, the heads of the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) confirmed, that they are prepared to provide financial backing for the project.[29] On 5 February 2010, the EIB vice-president Mathias Kollatz-Ahnensaid that Nabucco consortium was seeking up to €2 billion (20–25% of costs) in bank financing. The EIB was ready to participate in the financing of this project; however, the precondition was that the partner countries should legally approve the pipeline's transit in their countries.[25] [61]

In September 2010, the consortium signed an agreement with EIB, EBRD, and the International Finance Corporation (IFC), according to which the banks will conduct due diligence for a financing package of €4 billion. Up to €2 billion will be signed by the EIB, up to €1.2 billion by the EBRD, and up to €800 million by the IFC.[62] All figures listed above relate to the original Nabucco Project. Updated figures for Nabucco West are undisclosed as of June 2013. Reinhard Mitschek, Managing Director of Nabucco said in an interview with Natural Gas Europe in May 2013 that "Nabucco is continuing to cooperate with the International Financial Institutions to ensure the bankability of the project, a large part of the legal due diligence has already been completed. A Letter of Intent has been signed with the IFIs most recently".[63] In a separate interview in February 2013, Mitschek confirmed that all legal and regulatory framework approved for the original Nabucco project would remain valid for Nabucco West.[64]

Supply sources

The potential suppliers for original Nabucco project were considered to be Iraq, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Egypt.[46] At the first stage, 10 billion cubic metres (350 billion cubic feet) of natural gas per year were expected from Iraq.[65] Iraqi gas would be imported via the Arab Gas Pipeline (extension to be built) from the Ekas field.[66] Turkmenistan would provide 10 billion cubic metres (350 billion cubic feet) of gas per year through Iran or across the Caspian Sea via the planned Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline.[25][38][67] [68] [69] OMV and RWE set up a joint venture, named the Caspian Energy Company, to carry out research for a gas pipeline across the Caspian Sea.[70] In the long term, Kazakhstan may become a supplier providing natural gas from the Northern Caspian reserves through the planned Trans-Caspian Gas Pipeline.[71]

Egypt could provide 3–5 billion cubic metres (110×10^9–180×10^9 cu ft) of natural gas through the Arab Gas Pipeline.[72] Prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has urged Egypt to export natural gas to Europe via the Nabucco pipeline.[73] Iran has also proposed to supply gas to Nabucco pipeline and this was backed by Turkey; however, due to the political conditions this is rejected by the EU and the United States.[7][8][74][75][76]

Nabucco-West is designated to carry Azeri gas from the second stage of Shah Deniz through TANAP pipeline.[41][77] The pipeline is able to transport between 10 – 23 BCM annually from the Shah Deniz gas field. OMV, a shareholder in Nabucco, also suggested that Nabucco will be used to transport gas from its Domino-1 deep-sea offshore well in the Black Sea. The Domino-1 well was OMV's largest gas find with 1.5 – 3 trillion cubic feet announced in February 2012.[78]

Project company

The project was developed by the Vienna-registered Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH. The managing director of the company was Reinhardt Mitschek.[72]

The shareholders of the company are:

Nabucco International is the owner of the five national Nabucco companies responsible for the operation and maintenance of the pipeline in their respective countries.[13][14][15]

RWE left the project and on 1 March 2013 OMV took over all of RWE's shares.[79] On 28 May 2013, it was announced that GDF Suez, a French utilities provider, agreed to buy a 9% stake from OMV.[80]

Alternative projects
Map of Nabucco and TANAP
Major existing and planned natural gas pipelines supplying Russian gas to Europe

The main competitor for the original project was South Stream. In 2006, Gazprom proposed an alternative project, in competition with the Nabucco pipeline, that would involve constructing a second section of the Blue Stream pipeline beneath the Black Sea to Turkey, and extending this up through Bulgaria and Serbia to western Hungary.[81] In 2007, instead the South Stream project through Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary and Slovenia to Austria and Italy was proposed.[12][82][83][84] On 10 March 2010, CEO of Eni, a partner in South Stream, Paolo Scaroni proposed to merge Nabucco and South Stream projects to "reduce investments, operational costs and increase overall returns".[85][86] This proposal was rejected by energy minister of Russia Sergei Shmatko saying that "South Stream is more competitive than Nabucco" and that "Nabucco and South Stream are far from being competitors".[87] According to Nobuo Tanaka, former executive director of the International Energy Agency, the Nabucco pipeline would be more effective in increasing Europe's energy security than the South Stream project as it would increase the number of gas suppliers.[88]

Even more important competitor became TANAP which would follow the Nabucco's original route in Turkey. Therefore, Nabucco consortium modified the project and sees the modified Nabucco-West as a prolongation of TANAP into Central Europe.[2][3] Nabucco West competed with the Trans Adriatic Pipeline and the Interconnector Turkey–Greece–Italy projects.[89]

Also liquefied natural gas was seen as competitor to Nabucco and to pipeline projects in general. Azerbaijan, Georgia, Romania and Hungary are developing Azerbaijan–Georgia–Romania Interconnector project, which is proposed to transport Azerbaijani gas to Europe in form of LNG.[90] Increasing availability of LNG from large gas-producing countries in the Middle-East and Africa stresses the economic viability of pipelines.[91]

Controversial aspects

Economic and political aspects

The Nabucco pipeline will supply only a limited number of countries in South-East and Central Europe.[19] In 2013, it was confirmed by Bulgarian President Rosen Plevneliev that the pipeline would transport gas to a minimum of 16 European countries including the gas hub in Baumgarten, Austria.[92] The project has been criticized as uneconomic because there is no guarantee that there will be sufficient gas supplies to make it profitable.[17] The Nabucco Gas Pipeline project, although initially intending to secure gas from Iraq and Iran has readjusted its intentions given the current political and economic instabilities in the two countries. It will initially transport 10 BCM from the Shah Deniz gas field with the ability to increase its capacity to 23 BCM as demand increases, along with supply.[78] One region that could also supply additional gas is the Black Sea, with OMV and Exxon Mobil announcing an enormous gas discovery in February 2012.[93]

The deputy chairman of the Russia's State Duma Energy Committee Ivan Grachev has questioned the viability of the Nabucco project and sees it as an attempt to put pressure on Russia.[94] This is supported by Russia's gas deals with Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, which by some observers has been seen as attempt to reserve potential Nabucco supplies.[95][96] Azerbaijan has stated that the gas will be transported only through those routes, which would be commercially most attractive.[89] Also the opening of the Central Asia – China gas pipeline and the agreements to build the South Stream pipeline has been seen as the end of Nabucco project.[97]

However, before the raise of project's costs and the proposal of modified project, RWE had claimed that the transportation of natural gas through the Nabucco pipeline would be cheaper than through South Stream or other alternative pipelines. According to RWE, the transportation of thousand cubic meters of gas from Shah Deniz field to Europe will cost through the Nabucco pipeline €77 versus €106 through the South Stream pipeline.[89] Russian opposition to the pipeline stems from their monopoly over European gas supplies. The Pipeline would lead to cheaper more secure gas supplies for the whole of Europe, due to the decreased influence of the oil linked gas price, this would provide economic benefits to the EU with cheaper energy helping the union become more competitive.

NGOs have also criticized the fact that the pipeline results in effective support of the authoritarian regime in Turkmenistan, which undermines the European Union's policy of human rights promotion.[98]

Fossil fuels

Some NGOs criticize the EIB and EBRD for their willingness to finance a fossil fuel project, claiming that it goes against the November 2007 resolution on trade and climate change passed in the European Union Parliament.[99] The resolution calls for "the discontinuation of public support via export credit agencies and public investment banks, for fossil fuel projects."[100] Non-governmental organizations also show disapproval, due to the public banks decision to be lenient to Turkmenistan Human and civil rights conditions.[101]

Security aspects

Concerns have been raised about the safety of the project. Gas for the Nabucco pipeline coming from Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan will have to pass near areas of instability in the South Caucasus.[102]

See also

References
  1. "Nabucco venture sees Iraq as top supplier". Hürriyet Daily News and Economic Review. 30 September 2010. Retrieved 11 October 2010.
  2. Socor, Vladimir (23 May 2012). ""Nabucco-West": Abridged Pipeline Project Officially Submitted to Shah Deniz Consortium". Eurasia Daily Monitor. 9 (98). Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
  3. Socor, Vladimir (11 May 2012). "Nabucco-West in Synergy with Trans-Anatolia Project". Eurasia Daily Monitor. 9 (90). Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 24 May 2012.
  4. "Joint declaration of Nabucco Shareholders, NIC, Potential Investors and Shah Deniz Consortium". Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH (NIC). Archived from the original on 28 June 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2013.
  5. "NABUCCO: Shah Deniz II Decision a Setback for Planned European Gas Highway". Publics.bg. 28 June 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2013.
  6. Taylor, Paul (22 February 2008). "U.S. throws weight behind EU's Nabucco pipeline". Reuters. Retrieved 23 February 2008.
  7. Nicola, Stefan (5 February 2008). "Analysis: Europe's pipeline war". United Press International. Archived from the original on 9 February 2008. Retrieved 11 February 2018.
  8. Grove, Thomas; Coskun, Orhan (13 July 2009). "Turkish PM says wants Nabucco to transport Iran gas". Reuters. Retrieved 13 July 2009.
  9. Cendrowicz, Leo (13 July 2009). "Europe Tries to Break Its Russian Gas Habit". Time. Retrieved 13 July 2009.
  10. van Aartsen, Jozias (4 February 2009). "Project of European Interest № NG3. Activity Report September 2007 - February 2009" (PDF). European Commission. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 January 2010. Retrieved 25 January 2010. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  11. "Decision No 1364/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 laying down guidelines for trans-European energy networks (TEN-E)". European Commission. 22 September 2006. Retrieved 25 January 2010. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. "Bulgarian Parliament Ratifies Nabucco Gas Pipeline Project". RTTNews. 3 February 2010. Retrieved 8 January 2010.
  13. "Exemption decision on the Romanian section of the Nabucco pipeline" (PDF). European Commission. Retrieved 11 February 2018. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  14. "Exemption decision on the Hungarian section of the Nabucco pipeline" (PDF) (in Hungarian). European Commission. Retrieved 11 February 2018. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. "Exemption decision on the Bulgarian section of the Nabucco pipeline" (PDF). European Commission. Retrieved 11 February 2018. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  16. "Independence Day For European Gas". Spiegel Online International. 13 July 2009. Retrieved 17 January 2010.
  17. "EU backs Nabucco pipeline to get off Russian gas". AFP. France 24. 27 January 2009. Retrieved 17 January 2010.
  18. Lobjakas, Ahto (13 July 2009). "'Strategic' Nabucco Deal Inked To Help Curb Dependence on Russian Gas". RFE/RL. Retrieved 17 January 2010.
  19. Dempsey, Judy (22 December 2009). "Hoping for More Than Just Energy From a Pipeline". New York Times. Retrieved 23 December 2009.
  20. "Eastern Europe: Import Dependence, Higher Prices". Naturalgaseurope.com. 2 April 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  21. "Frequently asked questions: Nabucco Gas Pipeline Project". Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH. Archived from the original on 29 April 2010. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
  22. Declaration of the Budapest Nabucco Summit. Budapest Nabucco Summit. 27 January 2009. Archived from the original on 18 July 2009. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  23. "Hopes revived for stalled Nabucco pipeline". EurActiv. 18 September 2007. Retrieved 5 July 2009.
  24. "RWE keen on Nabucco supplies". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 19 October 2007. Retrieved 10 November 2007.
  25. Victor Negrescu. "The Nabucco Project and Communicating about Energy Security". Acta Universitatis Danubius.
  26. Dempsey, Judy (11 June 2008). "EU natural gas pipeline project gets first order". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 July 2010.
  27. "DAVOS-Azeri chief urges political, financial will for Nabucco". Reuters. 29 January 2009. Retrieved 31 January 2009.
  28. "Turkey Hopes to Sign Nabucco Deal by June". Journal of Turkish Weekly. 16 April 2009. Archived from the original on 13 August 2009. Retrieved 16 April 2009.
  29. "Proposed Nabucco Gas Pipeline Gets European Bank Backing". Deutsche Welle. 27 January 2009. Retrieved 31 January 2008.
  30. Kurt, Süleyman (23 April 2009). "President Gül invited to Nabucco summit with EU leaders". Today's Zaman. p. 4. Retrieved 28 April 2009.
  31. "The Declaration - Prague Summit, Southern Corridor" (Press release). Government of the Czech Republic. 9 May 2009. Retrieved 5 July 2009.
  32. "Europe gas pipeline deal agreed". BBC News. 13 July 2009. Retrieved 13 July 2009.
  33. "Nabucco Summits Begins". Turkish Press. 13 July 2009. Archived from the original on 22 December 2011. Retrieved 13 July 2009.
  34. Kelly, Ian (13 July 2009). "Signing Ceremony for the Intergovernmental Agreement on the Nabucco Pipeline" (Press release). United States Department of State. Retrieved 13 July 2009.
  35. Koranyi, Balazs (20 October 2009). "Hungary Parliament ratifies Nabucco pipeline deal". Reuters. Retrieved 8 January 2010.
  36. Tsolova, Tsvetelia (3 February 2010). "Bulgaria parliament ratifies Nabucco gas project". Reuters. Retrieved 15 July 2010.
  37. "Romania Ratifies Nabucco Gas Pipeline Agreement". SeeNews. 16 February 2010. Archived from the original on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 15 July 2010.
  38. Senerdem, Melis (5 March 2010). "Turkmen gas deal for Nabucco seen in months-RWE exec". Reuters. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
  39. Badalova, A. (5 March 2010). "RWE: Ratifying Nabucco agreement by Turkey gives Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan basis for conclusion of gas contracts". Trend News Agency. Archived from the original on 5 March 2010. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
  40. "Nabucco Project Support Agreements finalised and signed". Pipelinesinternational.com. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  41. Tsolova, Tsvetelia; Gloystein, Henning (10 January 2013). "Nabucco pipeline boosts prospects with Azeri deal". Reuters. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  42. Prodhan, Georgina (4 March 2013). "Nabucco signs cooperation deal with TANAP". Reuters. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  43. "Shah Deniz Project Selects TAP As European Gas Pipeline". The Wall Street Journal. 28 June 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2013.
  44. "Nabucco project 'over' after rival pipeline wins Azeri gas bid". EurActiv. 27 June 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2013.
  45. "Route". Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 28 October 2010.
  46. "Nabucco: Modification of feeder line concept" (Press release). Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH. 23 August 2010. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 28 October 2010.
  47. Стайкова, Росица (2010). "Газопровод "Набуко" получи обществената подкрепа на Върбица" (in Bulgarian). Шуменска заря. Archived from the original on 27 October 2010. Retrieved 18 January 2011.
  48. "Design of Bulgarian Section of Nabucco Pipeline to Be Ready in Late 2011". Bulgarian News Agency. Ukrinform. 19 March 2010. Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
  49. "Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Romania". Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH. Archived from the original on 14 July 2011. Retrieved 15 July 2010.
  50. "PGNiG Eyes Link To Nabucco". Downstream Today. AFX News Limited. 14 April 2008. Retrieved 19 April 2008.
  51. "Overview". Nabucco Pipeline International GmbH. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  52. "Nabucco West Selected as Potentaial Route for Azeri Gas". Zulfugar Agayev and Zoe Schneeweiss. Bloomberg Businessweek. 28 June 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  53. "Penspen takes on Nabucco role". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 7 January 2008. Retrieved 20 April 2008.
  54. "Nabucco Gas Pipeline International GmbH appointed New Owner's Engineer". News.az. 21 December 2011. Retrieved 26 December 2011.
  55. "Italian Saipem to perform Front End Engineering and Design services for Nabucco West". Trend.az. 28 January 2013. Archived from the original on 28 May 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  56. Harrison, Peter (6 May 2011). "Nabucco sees commercial gas transport start in 2017". Reuters. Retrieved 6 May 2011.
  57. "Nabucco Construction Start Delayed To 2013". Mediafax. 6 May 2011. Retrieved 6 May 2011.
  58. "EU-backed Nabucco project 'over' after rival pipeline wins Azeri gas bid". EurActiv.com. 27 June 2013.
  59. "Nabucco Gas Pipe's Cost to Fall on Shorter Route, Mitschek Says". Bloomberg. 15 November 2012. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  60. "EU throws €2.3bn at gas, power connections". EurActiv. 4 March 2010. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
  61. Senerdem, Melis; Grove, Thomas (5 February 2010). "Nabucco seen asking EIB for up to 2 bln euro–EIB". Reuters. Retrieved 8 February 2010.
  62. "Finance giants run rule over Nabucco". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 6 September 2010. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
  63. "Reinhard Mitschek: Nabucco Offers the Biggest Market Access without Hidden Costs". Natural Gas Europe. 30 May 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  64. ""Nabucco is a Truly European Project": An Interview with Reinhard Mitschek". Natural Gas Europe. 14 February 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  65. "Nabucco sets sights on Iraq". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 30 September 2010. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
  66. "EU, Iraq Seek To Seal Nabucco Deal Within Weeks - Barroso". Downstream Today. Deutsche Presse-Agentur. 16 April 2008. Retrieved 19 April 2008.
  67. "EU secures Turkmenistan gas deal". BBC News. 14 April 2008. Retrieved 19 April 2008.
  68. "Ashgabat offers gas for Nabucco". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 10 July 2009. Retrieved 11 July 2009.
  69. de Leon, Phillip H. (18 November 2009). "The Great Geopolitical Battle Over Energy Transit Routes". Finchannel.com. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
  70. "OMV, RWE Launch Caspian Pipeline JV". Downstream Today. 22 December 2008. Retrieved 25 December 2008.
  71. Yenikeyeff, Shamil (November 2008). "Kazakhstan's Gas: Export Markets and Export Routes" (PDF). Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Retrieved 17 November 2011. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  72. Barnett, Neil (14 March 2008). "Interview with Nabucco Managing Director Reinhardt Mitschek". Centre for European Policy Analysis. Archived from the original on 10 April 2008. Retrieved 20 April 2008.
  73. Barkat, Amiram (15 September 2011). "Erdoğan urges Egypt to export gas to Europe via Turkey". Globes. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
  74. "Iran seen as alternative to Turkmenistan in Nabucco gas project". RIA Novosti. 11 April 2008. Retrieved 19 April 2008.
  75. Sweeney, Conor (5 June 2008). "US still opposes Iran as Nabucco gas supplier". Reuters. Retrieved 13 June 2008.
  76. Gokoluk, Selcuk (11 July 2009). "Russia free to supply gas to Nabucco-U.S. envoy". Reuters. Retrieved 11 July 2009.
  77. Yeşiyurt, Servet; Hayatsever, Hüseyin (27 December 2011). "Turkey, Azerbaijan Deal to Transfer Gas to Europe". The Turkish Weekly. Archived from the original on 5 January 2012. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  78. Schneeweiss, Zoe (10 May 2012). "OMV Says Construction of Nabucco Pipe May Start in 2015". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  79. Shields, Michael (2 April 2013). "OMV buys RWE stake in Nabucco gas pipeline project". Reuters. Retrieved 14 April 2013.
  80. Shields, Michael (28 May 2013). "OMV sells 9 pct Nabucco pipeline stake to GDF SUEZ". Reuters. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  81. Dempsey, Judy (13 July 2006). "Gazprom's grip on Western Europe tightens with pipelines to Hungary". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 November 2007.
  82. MacDonald, Neil (25 February 2008). "Balkan boost for Russian gas plan". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 26 February 2008.
  83. Geropoulos, Kostis (3 November 2007). "Russia prefers South Stream over Blue Stream II". New Europe. Archived from the original on 28 June 2008. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
  84. "Gazprom Agrees To Boost Pipeline Capacity". Deutsche Presse-Agentur. Downstream Today. 15 May 2009. Retrieved 16 May 2009.
  85. "ENI calls for South Stream, Nabucco links". United Press International. 11 March 2010. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
  86. Martinez, Andres R.; Resnick-Ault, Jessica (10 March 2010). "Europe Needs to Push Gas Infrastructure Spending, Scaroni Says". Bloomberg. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
  87. Shiryaevskaya, Anna (15 March 2010). "Russia Rejects Eni Call to Merge Europe Gas Pipelines". Bloomberg. Retrieved 20 March 2010.
  88. "Energy Supremo: Nabucco Pipeline Is Best European Solution". Novinit. 24 February 2010. Retrieved 5 March 2010.
  89. Aliyev, Seymur (15 January 2010). "Gas exporters wait for efficient commercial offers: Trend Capital commentator". Trend News Agency. Archived from the original on 17 January 2010. Retrieved 16 January 2010.
  90. "Four countries team up for 'LNG Nabucco'". EurActiv. 20 September 2010. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
  91. Gismatullin, Eduard (24 November 2010). "BP Says Increased LNG Supply Reduces Europe's Pipe Gas Imports". Bloomberg. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
  92. "Mitschek: Nabucco answers Azerbaijan's strategic consideration". EurActiv. 29 May 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2013.
  93. "Petrom/Exxon Black Sea well finds huge gas field-OMV". Reuters. 22 February 2012. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  94. "Russian MPs criticize Nabucco gas pipeline project". Ekho Moskvy. EU–Russia Centre. 14 July 2009. Archived from the original on 26 July 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2010.
  95. Socor, Vladimir (15 October 2009). "Azerbaijan-Russia Gas Agreement: Implications for Nabucco Project". 6 (189). Eurasia Daily Monitor. Retrieved 23 November 2009.
  96. Socor, Vladimir (4 January 2010). "Russia Resuming Gas Imports From Turkmenistan on a Small Scale". 7 (1). Jamestown Foundation. Retrieved 5 January 2010.
  97. Ramsay, William C. (December 2009). "Doubts about Nabucco Don't Originate in China - Look to Europe". Institut français des relations internationales. Retrieved 25 January 2010.
  98. Nabucco gas pipeline, CEE Bankwatch Network.
  99. "Four reason to keep public money away from Nabucco". CEE Bankwatch Network. 4 December 2009. Retrieved 5 June 2013.
  100. "European Parliament resolution of 29 November 2007 on trade and climate change (2007/2003(INI))". European Parliament. 29 November 2009. Retrieved 23 July 2010. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  101. "Nabucco and Turkmenistan –our energy security, Turkmen's misery" (PDF). CEE Bankwatch Network. June 2010. Retrieved 23 July 2010.
  102. "BP shuts in Georgia links". Upstream Online. NHST Media Group. 12 August 2008. Retrieved 23 July 2010.

Further reading
  • Kusznir, Julia: "The Nabucco Gas Pipeline Project and its Impact on EU Energy Policy in the South Caucasus" in the Caucasus Analytical Digest No. 33
  • Negrescu, Victor: "The Nabucco Project and Communicating about Energy Security" in the Acta Universitatis Danubius (short essay)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.