Usili Formation

The Usili Formation is a Late Permian geologic formation in Tanzania. It preserves fossils of many terrestrial vertebrates from the Permian, including temnospondyls, pareiasaurs, therapsids and the archosauromorph Aenigmastropheus.[1][2]

Usili Formation
Stratigraphic range: Lopingian
~259–252 Ma
TypeGeological formation
Unit ofSongea Group
UnderliesManda Formation
OverliesRuhuhu Formation
Thickness260 m (850 ft)
Lithology
PrimarySandstone, conglomerate
OtherSiltstone, mudstone
Location
Coordinates10.3°S 35.1°E / -10.3; 35.1
Approximate paleocoordinates55.1°S 15.2°E / -55.1; 15.2
RegionRuvuma Region
Country Tanzania
ExtentRuhuhu Basin
Type section
Named forUsili Mountain
Named byStockley
Year defined1932

History of study

Animals from locality B35 of the Usili Formation

One of the first to study rocks of the Usili Formation was British geologist G. M. Stockley. In 1932, Stockley explored the geology of the Ruhuhu Basin in Tanzania. He called a series of layers dating from the Late Carboniferous to the Middle Triassic of the Songea Series and divided it into eight units labelled K1-K8. Stockley was also the first to describe fossils from these rocks, naming an older layer the "Lower Bone Bed" and a younger layer the "Upper Bone Bed".[3]

In 1957, paleontologist Alan J. Charig described many more fossils from the upper bone beds in his Ph.D. thesis for the University of Cambridge.[4][5] Subsequently, Stockley's units were renamed, Charig (1963) calling unit K6 the Kawinga Formation, K7 the Kingori Sandstones, and K8 the Manda Formation. Fossils were identified in many strata, invalidating Stockley's division into two distinct bone beds. Since Charig's description, the Kawinga Formation has been renamed the Usili Formation, the Kingori Sandstones have become the Kingori Sandstone Member of the Manda Formation, and Charig's original Manda Formation has become a subunit of the formation called the Lifua Member.[3] Six formations and one informal unit are currently recognized in the Songea Group (Ruhuhu basin) rocks range in age from Pennsylvanian to Anisian, including the Idusi (K1), Mchuchuma (K2), Mbuyura (K3), Mhukuru (K4), Ruhuhu (K5), and Usili (K6) formations and the informal Manda Beds, which include the Kingori Sandstone (K7) and Lifua Member (K8).[6]

Recent studies have described the Usili Formation as a 260 metres (850 ft) thick fluvio-lacustrine succession made up of a lowermost conglomeratic interval that is approximately 5 meters thick, grading up into a trough cross-bedded, coarse-grained, sandstone-dominated interval that is 25 to 40 metres (82 to 131 ft) thick, overlain by massive nodular siltstone and laminated mudstone beds with minor ribbon sandstones forming the bulk of the succession. Since Parrington (1956), the Usili Formation became widely recognized as a Late Permian formation that correlates with the Teekloof and Balfour formations of South Africa, as well as with the Zambian Upper Madumabisa Mudstone (Cistecephalus AZ). Comparison of Usili tetrapods with those of the lower Beaufort Group has suggested a broad biostratigraphic correlation with the Cistecephalus, Dicynodon, and Tropidostoma assemblage zones. Sidor et al. (2010) recognized only one undivided tetrapod faunal assemblage in the Usili Formation, which includes Aenigmastropheus, temnospondyls, pareiasaurs, gorgonopsians, therocephalians, cynodonts, and dicynodonts, whose remains were collected from various localities. This suggests that several therapsid genera have unequal stratigraphic ranges and temporal durations in the Ruhuhu and Karoo basins.[2][6]

Sidor et al. (2010) and Sidor et al. (2013) noted that it is probable that the Chiweta Beds of Malawi and the Usili Formation of Tanzania represent the same rock unit, separated only by political boundaries and geologic faulting (being located on either side of Lake Nyasa). Except for the burnetiid MAL 240, which is unique to the Chiweta Beds, the Usili Formation hosts identical genera, including Aelurognathus, Dicynodontoides, Rhachiocephalus, Endothiodon cf. E. bathystoma, Oudenodon baini, Gorgonops? dixeyi and an indeterminate tusked dicynodont (SAM-PK-7862, SAM-PK-7863).[1][6]

Paleobiota

Tetrapods

Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.

Temnospondyls

TaxonLocalityMaterialNotesImages
Peltobatrachus pustulatusA stereospondyl, endemic to this formation.

Parareptiles

TaxonLocalityMaterialNotesImages
Anthodon serrariusA pareiasaur. Originally named Anthodon minisculus, but it was considered a junior synonym of A. serrarius by Lee (1997).
Pareiasaurus serridensA pareiasaur.
UnnamedGPIT K72, six or seven dorsal vertebrae with articulated osteodermsA pareiasaur originally described by von Huene (1944), endemic to this formation.

Eureptiles

TaxonLocalityMaterialNotesImages
Aenigmastropheus parringtoniB35UMZC T836, a partial postcranial skeleton including five posterior cervical and anterior dorsal vertebrae, the distal half of the right humerus, a fragment of probable left humeral shaft, the proximal end of the right ulna, and three indeterminate fragments of bone, one of which may represent a partial radius.A protorosaurid archosauromorph, endemic to this formation.
Anomodonts
TaxonLocalityMaterialNotesImages
Daptocephalus leonicepsA dicynodontoid dicynodont, previously considered to be a species of Dicynodon, known only from South Africa.
Daptocephalus hueneiB2 (Kingori)SAM-PK-10630, fragmentary skull and postcrania; 7 additional skullsA dicynodontoid dicynodont, the holotype was formerly assigned as a species of Dicynodon.
Dicynodon lacerticepsA dicynodontoid dicynodont, known only from South Africa.
Dicynodon angielczykiUMZC T1089, a complete skull; 6 additional partial to complete skulls and some possible postcraniaA species named for specimens of Dicynodon formerly assigned to Daptocephalus huenei.[7]
Dicynodon robertsiOriginally considered to be a species of Dicynodon, but it is a junior synonym of Oudenodon bainii.
"Dicynodon" tealeiB32SAM-PK-10631, fragmentary skull roofAn indeterminate dicynodont, a nomen dubium.
Dicynodontoides nowackiKingoriGPIT/RE/7174, a nearly complete skull; other skulls and skeletonsA kingoriid dicynodont, previously considered to be a species of Dicynodon.
Endothiodon cf. bathystomaBasal dicynodont, endothiodontid.
Endothiodon sp. nov.A new, yet unnamed species.
Endothiodon uniseriesBasal dicynodont, endothiodontid. Originally placed in its own genus Esoterodon.
Euptychognathus bathyrhynchusKingoriGPIT/RE/7104 (UT K 19), well preserved partial skullBasal lystrosaurid dicynodont, previously considered to be a species of Dicynodon.
Geikia locusticepsGPIT K87/UT von HUENE 1942 Abb.3, juvenile partial skull and dentary; GPIT K114, skull and dentaryA geikiine cryptodont, previously considered to be a species of Dicynodon.
Katumbia parringtoniB19 (Kingori); B4 (Katumbi); Usili-BergesGPIT K120/UT Huene 1942 S.155, fragmentary skull; UMZC T761, UMZC T791, incomplete skulls; A dentaryBasal dicynodontoid, endemic to this formation.
Kawingasaurus fossilisKingoriUT K 52, skull and dentary; UT K 56, skull; UT K 55, 5 skulls and postcraniaA cistecephalid dicynodont, endemic to this formation.
Oudenodon bainiiMany skullsBasal oudenodontid cryptodont.
Pachytegos stockleyiB32SAM 10639, SAM 10642, fragmentary skull elementsBasal dicynodont, endothiodontid, endemic to this formation.
Pristerodon mackayiNMT RB38Basal dicynodont, eumantellid. Previous reports by King (1988, 1992), King and Rubidge (1993), and Gay and Cruickshank (1999) were based on the holotype specimen of Katumbia parringtoni. In 2008, the first diagnostic specimen of Pristerodon mackayi from this formation, NMT RB38, was discovered.
Rhachiocephalus behemothGPIT K 15, nearly complete skull; GPIT K 15B, fragmentary skullA rhachiocephalid cryptodont.
Rhachiocephalus magnusMany specimensA rhachiocephalid cryptodont.
UnnamedNMT RB22, a partial maxilla of an adult. NMT RB156, a nearly complete skull, mandible, and associated postcrania of a subadult.A new genus and species of a cryptodontian dicynodont. Endemic to this formation.
Biarmosuchians
TaxonLocalityMaterialNotesImages
Burnetiidae indet.NMT RB4, partial isolated skull roof; NMT RB36, fragmentary right dorsal margin of the orbitA burnetiid most closely related to Burnetia mirabilis from the Dicynodon AZ of South Africa. Too fragmentary to be assigned to a new taxon, its morphology is unique among Cistecephalus AZ taxa.
Cynodonts
TaxonLocalityMaterialNotesImages
Procynosuchus delaharpeaeIGP K 92, fragmentary skullA procynosuchid
Therocephalians
TaxonLocalityMaterialNotesImages
Silphictidoides ruhuhuensisKingoriK 70, nearly complete skull and dentary; K 125, nearly complete skull, dentary and right humerusA baurioid, endemic to this formation.
Theriognathus micropsKingoriK 107 and K 84, two fragmentary skullsA whaitsiid
Gorgonopsians
TaxonLocalityMaterialNotesImages
Cyonosaurus broomianusA gorgonopsian
Dinogorgon rubidgeiKingoriIGP K 16, nearly complete skull and dentaryA gorgonopsid, endemic to this formation.
"Dixeya" nasutusIGP K 52, nearly complete skull; IGP K 96, fragmentary skull; 6 more skullsA gorgonopsid reassigned to the new genus, "Njalila", unofficially by Gebauer (2007). Endemic to this formation.
Gorgonops sp.A gorgonopsid
Lycaenops sp.A gorgonopsid
Rubidgea atroxIGP K 46, fragmentary skullA gorgonopsid, endemic to this formation.
Ruhuhucerberus haughtoniKatumbi, B4MZC T891, nearly complete skullA gorgonopsid, endemic to this formation.
Sauroctonus parringtoniUsili-BergesIGP U 28, complete skull and dentary and fragmentary skeletonA gorgonopsid, endemic to this formation.
Scylacops capensisKingori, B19MZC T885/FRP 93, skull and cervical vertebraeA gorgonopsid
Sycosaurus nowakiKingoriIGP K 47, nearly complete skullA gorgonopsid, endemic to this formation.

References

  1. Sidor, C. A.; Vilhena, D. A.; Angielczyk, K. D.; Huttenlocker, A. K.; Nesbitt, S. J.; Peecook, B. R.; Steyer, J. S.; Smith, R. M. H.; Tsuji, L. A. (2013). "Provincialization of terrestrial faunas following the end-Permian mass extinction". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (20): 8129–33. doi:10.1073/pnas.1302323110. PMC 3657826. PMID 23630295.
  2. Ezcurra, M. N. D.; Scheyer, T. M.; Butler, R. J. (2014). "The Origin and Early Evolution of Sauria: Reassessing the Permian Saurian Fossil Record and the Timing of the Crocodile-Lizard Divergence". PLoS ONE. 9 (2): e89165. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089165. PMC 3937355. PMID 24586565.
  3. Butler, R. J.; Barrett, P. M.; Abel, R. L.; Gower, D. J. (2009). "A possible ctenosauriscid archosaur from the Middle Triassic Manda Beds of Tanzania". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29 (4): 1022–1031. doi:10.1671/039.029.0404.
  4. Charig, A. J. (1957). New Triassic archosaurs from Tanganyika, including Mandasuchus and Teleocrater: Dissertation Abstracts. Cambridge University.
  5. Nesbitt, S. J.; Butler, R. J. (2012). "Redescription of the archosaur Parringtonia gracilis from the Middle Triassic Manda beds of Tanzania, and the antiquity of Erpetosuchidae". Geological Magazine. 150 (2): 225–238. doi:10.1017/S0016756812000362.
  6. Sidor, C. A.; Angielczyk, K. D.; Weide †, D. M.; Smith, R. M. H.; Nesbitt, S. J.; Tsuji, L. A. (2010). "Tetrapod fauna of the lowermost Usili Formation (Songea Group, Ruhuhu Basin) of southern Tanzania, with a new burnetiid record". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 30 (3): 696–703. doi:10.1080/02724631003758086.
  7. Christian F. Kammerer (2019). "Revision of the Tanzanian dicynodont Dicynodon huenei (Therapsida: Anomodontia) from the Permian Usili Formation". PeerJ. 7: e7420. doi:10.7717/peerj.7420. PMC 6708577. PMID 31497385.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.