Fund of funds

Investing in a collective investment scheme may increase diversity compared with a small investor holding a smaller range of securities directly. Investing in a fund of funds may achieve greater diversification. According to modern portfolio theory, the benefit of diversification can be the reduction of volatility while maintaining average returns. However, this is countered by the increased fees paid both at FOF level and at the level of the underlying investment fund.

Management fees for FOFs are typically higher than those on traditional investment funds because they include the management fees charged by the underlying funds.[3]

In its article on Funds of Funds, Investopedia notes that, “Historically, a fund of funds showed an expense figure that didn't always include the fees of the underlying funds. As of January 2007, the SEC began requiring that these fees be disclosed in a line called ‘Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses’ (AFFE).” [4] [5]

After allocation of the levels of fees payable and taxation, returns on FOF investments will generally be lower than what single-manager funds can yield. However, some FOFs waive the second level of fees (the FOF fee) so that investors only pay the expenses of the underlying mutual funds. [6]

Pension funds, endowments and other institutions often invest in funds of hedge funds for part or all of their "alternative asset" programs, i.e., investments other than traditional stock and bond holdings.

The due diligence and safety of investing in FOFs has come under question as a result of the Bernie Madoff investment scandal, where many FOFs put substantial investments into the scheme. It became clear that a motivation for this was the lack of fees by Madoff, which gave the illusion that the FOF was performing well. The due diligence of the FOFs apparently did not include asking why Madoff was not making this charge for his services.[7] 2008 and 2009 saw FOFs take a battering from investors and the media on all fronts from the hollow promises made by over-eager marketers to the strength (or lack) of their due diligence processes to those carefully explained and eminently justifiable extra layers of fees, all reaching their zenith with the Bernie Madoff fiasco.[8]

These strategic and structural issues have caused fund-of-funds to become less and less popular. Nonetheless, fund-for-funds remain important in particular asset classes, including venture capital and for particular investors in order for them to be able to diversify their too low or too high level of assets under management appropriately.[9]

The FOF structure may be useful for asset-allocation funds, that is, an "exchange-traded fund (ETF) of ETFs" or "mutual fund of mutual funds". For example, iShares has asset-allocation ETFs, which own other iShares ETFs.[10] Similarly, Vanguard has asset-allocation mutual funds, which own other Vanguard mutual funds. The "parent" funds may own the same "child" funds, with different proportions to allow for "aggressive" to "conservative" allocation. This structure simplifies management by separating allocation from security selection.

According to Preqin (formerly known as Private Equity Intelligence), in 2006, funds investing in other private equity funds (i.e., FOFs, including secondary funds) amounted to 14% of all committed capital in the private equity market. The following ranking of private equity FOF investment managers is based on information published by Private Equity Intelligence:

Rank	Name of the firm	Currently Committed to PE (billions of USD)	Headquarters
1	AlpInvest Partners	$42.3	Amsterdam
2	Ardian (formerly AXA Private Equity)	$34.9	Paris
3	AIG Investments	$24.6	New York
4	Goldman Sachs Private Equity Group	$24.0	New York
5	Adams Street Partners	$24.0	Chicago, Illinois
6	LGT Capital Partners	$23.0	Pfaeffikon, Switzerland
7	Pantheon Ventures	$22.6	London
8	Pathway Capital Management	$20.6	Irvine, California
9	Capital Dynamics	$20.0	Zug, Switzerland
10	Partners Group	$19.6	Baar-Zug, Switzerland
11	Lehman Brothers	$19.0	New York
12	Allianz Capital Partners	$17.84	Munich
13	HarbourVest Partners	$17.8	Boston, Massachusetts
14	PCG Asset Management	$15.0	San Diego, California
15	GCM Grosvenor	$14.0	Chicago
16	LGT Capital Partners	$13.5	Pfaeffikon, Switzerland
17	Horizon21 Alternative Investments	$11.5	Pfaeffikon, Switzerland
18	SL Capital Partners	$9.3	Edinburgh
19	Portfolio Advisors	$7.5	Darien, Connecticut
20	Commonfund Capital	$7.5	Wilton, Connecticut
21	Horsley Bridge Partners	$7.1	San Francisco, California
22	SVG Capital	$7.0	London
23	European Investment Fund	$6.8	Luxembourg
24	Grove Street Advisors	$6.5	Boston
25	Macquarie Funds Management Group	$6.1	Sydney
26	Abbott Capital Management	$6.0	New York

Source: Preqin (formerly known as Private Equity Intelligence)[11]

According to 2011 Preqin Global Private Equity Report, largest firms by total FOF capital raised in the last ten years ($bn) are:

Rank	Name of the firm	Total FoF Capital Raise in last 10 years (billions of USD)	Location
1	HarbourVest Partners	$19.3	United States
2	Adams Street Partners	$12.5	United States
3	Pantheon Ventures	$12.1	UK
4	Goldman Sachs Private Equity Group	$10.9	United States
5	Pathway Capital Management	$9.8	United States
6	Commonfund Capital	$7.3	United States
7	Siguler Guff	$6.8	United States
8	SL Capital Partners	$6.7	UK
9	ATP Private Equity Partners	$6.5	Denmark
10	Partners Group	$5.8	Switzerland

Source: Preqin[12]

A fund of hedge funds is a fund of funds that invests in a portfolio of different hedge funds to provide broad exposure to the hedge fund industry and to diversify the risks associated with a single investment fund. Funds of hedge funds select hedge fund managers and construct portfolios based upon those selections. The fund of hedge funds is responsible for hiring and firing the managers in the fund. Some funds of hedge funds might have only one hedge fund in them, which lets ordinary investors into a highly acclaimed fund, or many hedge funds.

Funds of hedge funds generally charge a fee for their services, always in addition to the hedge fund's management and performance fees, which can be 1.5% and 15-30%, respectively. Fees can reduce an investor's profits and potentially reduce the total return below what could be achieved through a less expensive mutual fund or exchange-traded fund (ETF).

A fund of venture capital funds is a fund of funds that invests in a portfolio of different venture capital funds for access to private capital markets. Clients are usually university endowments and pension funds.[13]

• Collective investment scheme
• Investment management
• Manager of managers fund
• Bernard Cornfeld, operator of perhaps the first "Fund of Funds" from 1962 until its collapse in 1970. .