Indie game

An independent video game or indie game is a video game typically created by individuals or smaller development teams without the financial and technical support of a large game publisher, in contrast to most "AAA" (triple-A) games. However, the "indie" term may apply to other scenarios where the development of the game has some measure of independence from a publisher even if a publishers helps fund and distribute a game, such as creative freedom. Because of their independence and freedom to develop, indie games often focus on innovation, experimental gameplay, and taking risks not usually afforded in AAA games, and may explore the medium to produce unique experiences in art games. Indie games tend to be sold through digital distribution channels rather than at retail due to lack of publisher support. The term is synonymous with that of independent music or independent film in those respective mediums.

This article is about a type of video game. For the 2012 documentary film, see Indie Game: The Movie. For indie games specifically about role-playing, see Indie role-playing game.
Screenshots from several indie games. Clockwise from top left: Flotilla, Broforce, Kentucky Route Zero, Alto's Adventure, Tacoma and Celeste.
Part of a series on the:
Video game industry
Activities/jobs
Development
Types
Topics
Related
Lists

Indie game development bore out from the same concepts of amateur and hobbyist programming that grew with the introduction of the personal computer and the simple BASIC computer language in the 1970s and 1980s. So-called bedroom coders, particularly in the United Kingdom, made their own games and used mail order to distribute their products, later shifting to other software distribution methods with the onset of the Internet in the 1990s such as shareware and other file sharing distribution methods, though by this time, interest in hobbyist programming had waned due to rising costs of development and competition from video game publishers and home consoles.

The modern take on the indie game scene resulted in a combination of numerous factors in the early 2000s, including technical, economic, and social concepts that made indie games less expensive to make and distribute, but more visible to larger audiences and offered non-traditional gameplay from the current mainstream games. A number of indie games at that time became success stories that drove more interest into the area. New industry opportunities arose since then, include new digital storefronts, crowdfunding and other indie fund mechanisms to help new teams get their games off the ground, low-cost and open source development tools available for smaller teams across all gaming platforms, boutique indie game publishers that leave creative freedom to the developers, and industry recognition of indie games alongside mainstream ones at major game award events.

Only recently had there become a concern of a rather large number of indie games, and while a projected "indiepocolylpse" in the mid-2010s never came to pass, discoverability of one's game remains an issue for most indie developers, with many indie games not being financially profitable. Examples of some successful indie games include Super Meat Boy, Fez, Braid, Minecraft, Among Us, Shovel Knight, Undertale, and Cuphead.

Definition

The term "indie game" itself is based on similar terms like independent film and independent music, where the concept is often related to self-publishing and independence from major studios or distributors.[1] However, as with both indie films and music, there is no exact, widely accepted definition of what constitutes an "indie game" besides falling well outside the bounds of triple-A video game development by large publishers and development studios.[2][3][4][5] One simple definition, described by Laura Parker for GameSpot, says "independent video game development is the business of making games without the support of publishers", but this does not cover all situations.[6]

Indie games generally share certain common characteristics. One method to define an indie game is the nature of independence, which can either be:[7]

  • Financial independence: In such situations, the developers have paid for the development and/or publication of the game themselves or from other funding sources such as crowd funding, and specifically without financial support of a large publisher.
  • Independence of thought: In this case, the developers crafted their game without any oversight or directional influence by a third party such as a publisher.

Another means to evaluate a game as indie is to examine its development team, with indie games being developed by individuals, small teams, or small independent companies that are often specifically formed for the development of one specific game.[3][8][9] Typically, indie games are smaller than mainstream titles.[9] Indie game developers are generally not financially backed by video game publishers, who are risk-averse and prefer "big-budget games".[10] Instead, indie game developers usually have smaller budgets, usually sourcing from personal funds or via crowdfunding.[2][3][5][11][12] Being independent, developers do not have controlling interests[4] or creative limitations,[3][13][5] and do not require the approval of a publisher,[2] as mainstream game developers usually do.[14] Design decisions are thus also not limited by an allocated budget.[13] Furthermore, smaller team sizes increase individual involvement.[15]

However, this view is not all-encompassing, as there are numerous cases of games where development is not independent of a major publisher but still considered indie.[1] Some notable instances of games include:

  • Journey was created by thatgamecompany, but had financial backing of Sony as well as publishing support. Kellee Santiago of thatgamecompany believes that they are an independent studio because they were able to innovate on their game without Sony's involvement.[1]
  • Bastion, similarly, was developed by Supergiant Games, but with publishing by Warner Bros. Entertainment, primarily to avoid difficulties with the certification process on Xbox Live.[16] Greg Kasavin of Supergiant notes they consider their studio indie as they lack any parent company.[1][17]
  • The Witness was developed by Jonathan Blow and his studio Thekla, Inc. Though self-funded and published, the game's development cost around $6 million and was priced at $40, in contrast to most indie games typically priced up to $20. Blow believed this type of game represented something between indie and AAA publishing.[18]
  • No Man's Sky was developed by Hello Games, though with publishing but non-financial support from Sony; the game on release had a price equal to a typical AAA title. Sean Murray of Hello Games believes that because they are still a small team and the game is highly experimental that they consider themselves indie.[19]
Nidhogg is an example of an indie game that relies on a retro pixel-based 1980s style for its presentation

Yet another angle to evaluate a game as indie is from its innovation, creativity, and artistic experimentation, factors enabled by small teams free of financial and creative oversight. This definition is reflective of an "indie spirit" that is diametrically opposite of the corporate culture of AAA development, and makes a game "indie", where the factors of financial and creative independence make a game "independent".[20][2][9][15][21][22][23][24] Developers with limited ability to create graphics can rely on gameplay innovation.[25] This often leads to indie games having a retro style of the 8-bit and 16-bit generations, with simpler graphics atop the more complex mechanics.[20] Indie games may fall into classic game genres, but new gameplay innovations have been seen.[22] However, being "indie" does not imply that the game focuses on innovation.[9][26] In fact, many games with the "indie" label can be of poor quality and may not be made for profit.[5]

Jesper Juul, an associate professor at The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts that has studied the video game market, wrote in his book Handmade Pixels that the definition of an indie game is vague, and depends on different subjective considerations. Juul classified three ways games can be considered indie: those that are financially independent of large publishers, those that are aesthetically independent and significantly different of the mainstream art and visual styles used in AAA games, and those that present cultural ideas that are independent from mainstream games. Juul however wrote that ultimately the labeling of a game as "indie" still can be highly subjective and no single rule helps delineate indie games from non-indie ones.[27]

Games that are not as large as most triple-A games, but are developed by larger independent studios with or without publisher backing and that can apply triple-A design principles and polish due to the experience of the team, have sometimes been called "triple-I" games, reflecting the middle ground between these extremes. Ninja Theory's Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice is considered a prime example of a triple-I game.[28][29]

Indie games are distinct from open source games. The latter are games which are developed with the intent to release the source code and other assets under an open source license. While many of the same principles used to develop open source games are the same as for indie games, open source games are not developed for commercial gain and instead as a hobbyist pursuit.[30] However, commercial sales are not a requirement for an indie game and such games can be offered as freeware, most notably with Spelunky on its original release and Dwarf Fortress with exception of a planned enhanced visual front-end version while its base version will remain free.[31]

History

The onset of indie game development is difficult to track due to the broadness of what defines an indie game, and the term was not really in use until the early 2000s.[32] Until the 2000s, other terms like amateur, enthusiast, and hobbyist software or games were used to describe such software.[33] Today, terms like amateur and hobbyist development are more reflective of those that create mods for existing games,[34] or work with specific technologies or game parts rather than the development of full games.[4] Such hobbyists usually produce non-commercial products and may range from novices to industry veterans.[4]

BASIC and bedroom coders (1970s–1980s)

There is some debate as to whether indie development started before PCs with games developed for mainframe computers at universities and other large institutions. Games such as 1963's Spacewar! were not commercially financed and were made by a small team, but there lacked a commercial sector of the video game industry at that time to distinguish from independent works.[35] However, one of the earliest known examples of games developed on contract for these systems was that of Joyce Weisbecker, who considers herself the first indie designer, as she had created several games for the RCA Studio II console in 1976 as an independent contractor for RCA.[36]

When the first personal computers were released in 1977, they each included a pre-installed version of the BASIC computer language along with example programs, including games, to show what users could do with these systems. While the manufacturers also had released commercial games that could be purchased for computers, the availability of BASIC led to people trying to make their own programs. Sales of the 1978 rerelease of the book BASIC Computer Games by David H. Ahl that included the source code for over one hundred games, eventually surpassed over one million copies.[37] The availability of BASIC inspired a number of people to start writing their own games.[3][24]

The ZX Spectrum was popular among British hobbyist programmers and helped to kick off its video game industry in the 1980s.

While the commercial sector of the video game industry was focused on the growing home video game console market in the late 1970s to early 1980s, a number of games for personal computers were released by one- or two-man teams, self-distributed in stores or sold through mail order.[32] This was particularly true in the United Kingdom, where video game consoles had not gained as much traction as in the United States. There, the early microcomputers such as the ZX Spectrum were popular, launching a range of "bedroom coders" which initiated the UK's video game industry.[38][39] By 1984, the United Kingdom's game industry had become crowded with many professional development teams making games at a large pace. Game developer Chris Crawford warned potential small developers away from the commercial prospects of the field in late 1984:

I will point out the sad truth. We have pretty much passed the period where hobbyists could put together a game that would have commercial prospect. It's much more difficult to break in, much less stay in. Right now ... I would discourage anyone. If you want to do a game, do it for fun, but don't try to do game designs to make any money. The odds are so much against the individual that I would hate to wish that heartbreak on anyone.[40]

During this period, the idea that indie games could provide experimental gameplay concepts or demonstrate niche arthouse appeal had been established.[35] Many games from the bedroom coders of the United Kingdom, such as Manic Miner (1983), incorporated the quirkiness of British humour and made them highly experimental games.[41][42] Other games like Alien Garden (1982) showed highly-experimental gameplay.[35] Infocom itself advertised its text-based interactive fiction games by eschewing their lack of graphics in lieu of the players' imagination, at a time that graphics-heavy action games were commonplace.[35]

Shareware and chasing the console (1990s)

By the mid-1990s, the recognition of the personal computer as a viable gaming option, and advances in technology that led to 3D gaming created many commercial opportunities for video games. During the last part of the 1990s, visibility of games from these single or small team studios scene wanes, since a small team could not readily compete in costs, speed and distribution as a commercial entity could. The industry had started to coalesce around video game publishers that could pay larger developers to make games and handle all the marketing and publication costs as well as opportunities to franchise game series.[39] Publishers tended to be risk averse due to high costs of production, and they would reject all small-size and too innovative concepts of small game developers.[43] The market also became fractured due to the prevalence of video game consoles, which required expensive or difficult-to-acquire game development kits typically reserved for larger developers and publishers.[24][44][35]

There were still significant developments from smaller teams that laid the basis of indie games going forward. Shareware games became a popular means to distribute demos or partially complete games in the 1980s and into the 1990s, where players could purchase the full game from the vendor after trying it. As such demos were generally free to distribute, shareware demo compilations would frequently be included in gaming magazines at that time, providing an easy means for amateur and hobbyist developers to be recognized. The ability to produce numerous copies of games, even if just shareware/demo versions, at a low cost helped to propel the idea as the PC as a gaming platform.[24][32] At the time, shareware was generally associated with hobbyist programmers, but with releases of Wolfenstein 3D in 1992 and Doom in 1993 showed the shareware route to be a viable platform for titles from mainstream developers.[35]

Rise of indie games from digital distribution (2000−2005)
N is a 2004 browser game that later was developed into a commercial indie game, N++ in 2015.

The common take on indie games on personal computer took shape in the early 2000s from several factors. Key was the availability of online distribution over the Internet, allowing game developers to sell directly to players and bypassing limitations of retail distribution and the need for a publisher.[45][32] Software technologies used to drive the growth of the World Wide Web, like Adobe Flash, were available at low cost to developers, and provided another means for indie games to grow.[25][32] The new interest in indie games led to middleware and game engine developers to offer their products at low or no cost for indie development,[32] in addition to open source libraries and engines.[46] Dedicated software like GameMaker Studio and tools for unified game engines like Unity and Unreal Engine removed much of the programming barriers needed for a prospective indie developer to create these games.[32] The commercial possibilities for indie games at this point helped to distinguish these games from any prior amateur game.[33]

There were other shifts in the commercial environment that were seen as drivers for the rise of indie games in the 2000s. Many of the games to be indie games of this period were considered to be the antithesis of mainstream games and which highlighted the independence of how these games were made compared to the collective of mainstream titles. Many of them took a retro-style approach to their design, art, or other factors in development, which proved popular with players.[33] Social and political changes also led to the use of indie games not only for entertainment purposes but to also tell a message related to these factors, something that cannot be done in mainstream titles.[33] In comparing indie games to independent film and the state of their respective industries, the indie game's rise was occurring approximately at the same relative time as its market was starting to grow exponentially and seen as a supporting offshoot of the mainstream works.[33]

Shifting industry and increased visibility (2005−2014)
Fez was one of several indie games highlighted in Indie Game: The Movie as indie games entered mainstream coverage.

Indie games saw a large boost in visibility within the video game industry and the rest of the world starting around 2005. A key driver was the transition into new digital distribution methods with storefronts like Steam that offered indie games alongside traditional AAA titles, as well as specialized storefronts for indie games. While direct online distribution helped indie games to reach players, these storefronts allowed developers to publish, update, and advertise their games directly, and players to download the games anywhere, with the storefront otherwise handling the distribution and sales factors.[34][25][3][22][24] While Steam itself initially began heavy curation, it eventually allowed for indie publishing with its Steam Greenlight and Steam Direct programs, vastly increasing the number of games available.[32]

Further driving indie game growth in this period came from the departure of large publishers like Electronic Arts and Activision from their smaller, one-off titles to focus on their larger, more successful properties, leaving the indie game space to provide shorter and more experimental titles as alternatives.[47] Costs of developing AAA games had risen greatly, to an average cost of tens of millions of dollars in 2007–2008 per title, and there was little room for risks in gameplay experimentation.[48]

Another driver came from discussions related to whether video games could be seen as an art form; movie critic Roger Ebert postulated in open debates that video games could not be art in 2005 and 2006, leading to developers creating indie games to specifically challenge that notion.[49]

Indie video game development saw a further boost by the use of crowdfunding as a means for indie developers to raise funds to produce a game and to determine the desire for a game, rather than risk time and investment into a game that does not sell well. While video games had used crowdfunding prior to 2012, several large indie game-related projects successfully raised millions of dollars through Kickstarter, and since then, several other similar crowdfunding options for game developers have become available. Crowdfunding eliminated some of the cost risk associated with indie game development, and created more opportunities for indie developers to take chances on new titles.[32]

With more indie titles emerging during this period, larger publishers and the industry as a whole started taking notice of indie games as a significant movement within the field. One of the first examples of this was World of Goo (2008), where its developers 2D Boy had tried but failed to gain any publisher support prior to release. On release, the game was recognized at various award events including the Independent Games Festival, leading to publishers that had previously rejected 2D Boy to offer to publish it.[50]

Console manufactures also helped to boost recognition of indie games in this period. By the seventh generation of consoles in 2005, each platform provided online services for players, such as Xbox Live, PlayStation Network, and Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection, which included digital distribution of games. Following the increased awareness of indie games for PC, these services started publishing indie games alongside commercial offerings to expand their libraries.[3][23] The Xbox 360 had launched in 2005 with the Xbox Live Arcade (XBLA) which had included some indie games among other titles, but these drew little attention in the first few years. In 2008, Microsoft ran its "XBLA Summer of Arcade" promotion which included the releases of indie games Braid, Castle Crashers, and Geometry Wars: Retro Evolved 2 alongside two AAA games. While all three indie games had high number of downloads, Braid was a critical darling and drew mainstream media recognition for a game developed by only two people.[51][52] Microsoft continued to follow up on this promotion in the following years, bringing in more games onto XBLA including Super Meat Boy, Limbo, and Fez.[53][54] Sony and Nintendo followed suit, also wooing indie developers to bring games onto their platforms.[51]

By 2013, all three console manufactures had established programs that allowed indie developers to apply for low-cost development toolkits and licenses to publish directly onto the console's respective storefronts following approval processes.[51] A number of "boutique" indie game publishers were founded in this period to support funding, technical support, and publishing of indie games across various digital and retail platforms.[55][56] The single best-selling game of all time, Minecraft, was also originally released as an indie game during this period.[57] The 2012 documentary Indie Game: The Movie covers several of the games that flourished from this period.[58]

Mobile games also became popular with indie developers, with inexpensive development tools and low-barrier storefronts with the App Store and Google Play which opened in the late 2000s.[59]

Fears over saturation and discoverability (2015−present)
The number of games, by year, published on Steam, estimated by Steam Spy in January 2020.[60][61][62] The years 2004 and 2005 are not visible on this chart.

Leading into 2015, there was concern that the rise of easy-to-use tools to create and distribute video games could lead to an oversupply of video games, this was termed the "indiepocalypse".[63] This perception of an indiepocalypse is not unanimous; Jeff Vogel stated in a talk at GDC 2016 that any downturn was just part of the standard business cycle. The size of the indie game market was estimated in March 2016 to be at least $1 billion per year for just those games offered through Steam.[64] Mike Wilson, Graeme Struthers and Harry Miller, the co-founders of indie publisher Devolver Digital, stated in April 2016 that the market in indie games is more competitive than ever but continues to appear healthy with no signs of faltering.[65] Gamasutra said that by the end of 2016, while there had not be any type of catastrophic collapse of the indie game market, there were signs that the growth of the market had significantly slowed and that it has entered a "post-indiepocalypse" phase as business models related to indie games adjust to these new market conditions.[66]

While there has not been any type of collapse of the indie game field since 2015, there are concerns that the market is far too large for many developers to get noticed. Very few selected indie titles get wide coverage in the media, and are typically referred to as "indie darlings". In some cases, indie darlings are identified through consumer reactions that praise the game, leading to further coverage; examples of such games include Celeste and Untitled Goose Game.[67] However, there are also times where the video game media may see a future title as a success and position it as an indie darling before its release, only to have the game fail to make a strong impression on players, such as in the case of No Man's Sky and Where the Water Tastes Like Wine.[68][69] Discoverability has become an issue for indie developers as well. With the Steam distribution service allows any developer to offer its game with minimal cost to them, there are thousands of games being added each year, and developers have become to rely heavily on Steam's discovery tools - methods to tailor catalog pages to customers based on past purchases - to help sell their titles.[70] Mobile app stores have had similar problems with large volumes of offers but poor means for discovery by consumers in the late 2010s.[59] Several indie developers have found it critical to have a good public relations campaign across social media and to interact with the press to make sure a game is noticed early on in its development cycle to get interest and maintain that interest through release, which adds to costs of development.[71][72]

In addition to titles like Celeste and Untitled Goose Game, other highly successful indie games released during this period included Undertale,[73] Stardew Valley,[74] and Cuphead.[75]

Other regions

Indie games are generally associated with Western regions, specifically with North American, European, and Oceanic areas. However, other countries have had similar expansions of indie games that have intersected with the global industry.

Japanese dōjin soft

In Japan, the dōjin soft community has generally been treated as a hobbyist activity up through the 2010s. Computers and bedroom coding had taken off similarly in the late 1970s and early 1980s, but the computer market was quickly overwhelmed by consoles. Still, hobbyist programmers continued to develop games. One area that Japan had focused on were game development kits, specialized software that would allow users to create their own games. A key line of these were produced by ASCII Corporation, which published ASCII a hobbyist programming magazine that users could share their programs with. Over time, ASCII saw the opportunity to publish game development kits, and by 1992, released the first commercial version of the RPG Maker software. While the software cost money to obtain, users could release completed games with it as freeware or commercial products, which established the potential for a commercial independent games market by the early 2000s, aligning with the popularity of indie games in the West.[76]

Like other Japanese fan-created works in other media, dōjin games were often built from existing assets and did not receive much respect or interest from consumers, and instead were generally made to be played and shared with other interested players and at conventions. Around 2013, market forces began to shift with the popularity of indie games in the Western regions, bringing more interest to dōjin games as legitimate titles. The Tokyo Game Show first offered a special area for dōjin games in 2013 with support from Sony Interactive Entertainment who had been a promoter of Western indie games in prior years, and has expanded that since.[77] There still remains a distinction between Japanese-developed dōjin games and indie games: games in the long-running bullet hell series, the Touhou Project, are still considered dōjin games, while Cave Story is not only considered an indie game, but one of the most successful Japanese-produced ones, and which also contributed to the resurgences of the Metroidvania genre.[78][79][80] Dōjin games also got a strong interest in Western markets after some English-speaking groups translated various titles with permission for English release, most notably with Recettear: An Item Shop's Tale, the first such dōjin to be published on Steam in 2010.[81][82]

Mikhail Fiadotau, a lecturer in video game studies at Tallinn University, identified three primary distinctions between the established dōjin culture and the Western idea of indie games. From a conceptual view, indie games generally promote independence and novelty in thought, while dōjin games tend to be ideas shared by a common group of people and tend to not veer from established concepts (such as strong favoritism towards the well-established RPG genre). From a genealogical standpoint, the nature of dōjin dates back as far as the 19th century, while the indie phenomena is relatively new. Finally, only until recently, dōjin games tended to only be talked about in the same circles as other dōjin culture (fan artwork and writing) and rarely mixed with commercial productions, whereas indie games have shared the same stage with AAA games.[83][84]

Development
Main article: Video game development

Many of the same basic concepts behind video game development for mainstream titles all apply to indie game development, particularly around the software development aspects. Key differences lie in how the development of the game ties in with the publisher or lack thereof.

Development teams
And Yet It Moves is an example of a student-developed game expanded to a commercial title following the team's graduation.

There is no definitive size to how big an independent game development studio might be. Several successful indie games, including Axiom Verge, Cave Story, Papers, Please, and Spelunky, were all developed by a single person, though often with support of artists and musicians for those assets.[85] More common are small teams of developers, from two to a few dozen, with additional support from external artists. While it is possible for development teams to be larger, there becomes a higher cost overhead of running the studio, which may be risky if the game does not perform well.[86]

Indie teams can arise from many different directions. One common path recently includes student projects, developed as prototypes as part of their coursework, which the students then take into commercial opportunity after graduating from school. Examples of such games include And Yet It Moves,[87] Octodad: Dadliest Catch,[88] Risk of Rain,[89] and Outer Wilds.[90] In some cases, students may drop out of school to pursue the commercial opportunity or for other reasons; Vlambeer's founders, for example, had started to develop a commercial game while still in school and dropped out when the school demanded rights to the game.[91]

Another route for indie development teams comes from experienced developers in the industry who either voluntarily leave to pursue indie projects, typically due to creative burnout from the corporate process, or resulting from termination from the company. Examples of games from such groups include FTL: Faster Than Light,[92] Papers, Please,[93] Darkest Dungeon,[94] and Gone Home.[95]

Yet another route are simply those with little to no experience in the games industry, though may have computer experience skills, and come in with ideas and fresh perspectives for games, with ideas that are generally more personable and close to their heart. These developers are usually self-taught and thus may not have certain disciplines of typical programmers, allowing for more creative freedom and new ideas.[96] However, some may see amateur work less favorably than those that have had experience, whether from school or from industry, relying on the game development toolkits rather than programming languages, and associate such titles as amateur or hobbyist.[97] Examples of such amateur games include Braid,[98] Super Meat Boy,[99] Dwarf Fortress,[100] and Undertale.[101]

Typically, a starting indie game studio will be primarily programmers and developers. Art assets including artwork and music can be outsourced to work-for-hire artists and composers.[102]

Development tools

For development of personal computer games, indie games typically rely on existing game engines, middleware and game development kits to build their titles, lacking the resources to build custom engines.[20] Common game engines include Unreal Engine and Unity, but there are numerous others as well. Small studios that do not anticipate large sales are generally afforded reduced prices for mainstream game engines and middleware. These produces may be offered free, or be offered at a substantial royalty discount that only increases if their sales exceed certain numbers.[103] Indie developers may also use open source software and homebrew libraries, which are freely available but may lack technically-advanced features compared to equivalent commercial engines.[103]

Prior to 2010, development of indie games on consoles was highly restrictive due to costly access to software development kits (SDKs), typically a version of the console with added debugging features that would cost several thousands of dollars and come with numerous restrictions on its use to prevent trade secrets related to the console from being leaked. Console manufactures may have also restricted sales of SDKs to only certain developers that met specific criteria, leaving potential indie developers unable to acquire them.[104] When indie games became more popular by 2010, the console manufacturers as well as mobile device operating system providers released special software-based SDKs to build and test games first on personal computers and then on these consoles or mobile devices. These SDKs were still offered at commercial rates to larger developers, but reduced pricing was provided to those who would generally self-publish via digital distribution on the console or mobile device's storefront, such as with the ID@Xbox program or the iOS SDK.

Publishers

While most indie games lack a publisher with the developer serving in that role, a number of publishers geared towards indie games have been established since 2010, also known as boutique game publishers; these include Raw Fury, Devolver Digital, Annapurna Interactive and Adult Swim Games. There also have been a number of indie developers that have grown large enough on their own to also support publishing for smaller developers, such as Chucklefish, Coffee Stain Studios, and Team17. These boutique publishers, having experience in making indie games themselves, typically will provide necessary financial support and marketing but have little to no creative control on developers' product as to maintain the "indie" nature of the game. In some cases, the publisher may be more selective of the type of games it supported; Annapurna Interactive sought games that were "personal, emotional and original".[55][105]

Funding

The lack of a publisher requires an indie developer to find means to fund the game themselves. Existing studios may be able to rely on past funds and incoming revenue, but new studios may need to use their own personal funds ("bootstrapping"), personal or bank loans, or investments to cover development costs,[12][105][106] or building community support while in development.[107][108]

More recently, crowd-funding campaigns, both reward-based and equity-based, have been used to obtain the funds from interested consumers before development begins in earnest. While using crowd-funding for video games took off in 2012, its practice has significantly waned as consumers became wary of campaigns that failed to deliver on promised goods. A successful crowd-funded campaign typically required significant development work and costs associated with before the campaign is launched to demonstrate that the game will likely be completed in a timely manner to draw in funds.[109]

Another mechanism offered through digital distribution is the early access model, in which interested players can buy playable beta versions of the game to provide software testing and gameplay feedback. Those consumers become entitled the full game for free on release, while others may have to pay a higher price for the final. This can provide funding midway though development, but like with crowd-funding, consumers expect a game that is near completion, so significant development and costs will have had to been invested already.[110] Minecraft was considered an indie game during its original development, and was one of the first titles to successfully demonstrate this approach to funding.[111]

More recently, a number of dedicated investor-based indie game funds have been established such as the Indie Fund. Indie developers can submit applications requesting grants from these funds. The money is typically provided as a seed investment to be repaid through game royalties.[108] Several national governments, through their public arts agencies, also have made similar grants available to indie developers.[112]

Distribution

Prior to digital distribution, hobbyist programmers typically relied on mail order to distribute their product. They would place ads in local papers or hobbyist computer magazines such as Creative Computing and Byte and, once payment was received, fulfil orders by hand, making copies of their game to cassette tape, floppy disc, or CD-ROM along with documentation. Others would provide copies to their local computer store to sell. In the United Kingdom, where personal computer game development took off in the early 1980s, a market developed for game distributors that handled the copying and distribution of games for these hobbyist programmers.[41]

As the media shifted to higher-capacity formats and with the ability for users to make their own copies of programs, the simple mail order method was threatened since one person could buy the game and then make copies for their friends. The shareware model of distribution emerged in the 1980s accepting that users would likely make copies freely and share these around. The shareware version of the software would be limited, and require payment to the developer to unlock the remaining features. This approach became popular with hobbyist games in the early 1990s, notably with the releases of Wolfenstein 3D and ZZT, "indie" games from fledgling developers id Software and Tim Sweeney (later founder of Epic Games), respectively. Game magazines started to include shareware games on pack-in demo discs with each issue, and as with mail-order, companies arose that provided shareware sampler discs and served to help with shareware payment and redemption processing. Shareware remained a popular form of distribution even with availability of bulletin board systems and the Internet.[113] By the 2000s, indie developers relied on the Internet as their primary distribution means as without a publisher, it was nearly impossible to stock an indie game at retail, the mail order concept having long since died out.[34]

Continued Internet growth led to dedicated video game sites that served as repositories for shareware and other games, indie and mainstream alike, such as GameSpy's FilePlanet.[114] A new issue had arise for larger mainstream games that featured multiplayer elements, in that updated and patches could easily be distributed through these sites but making sure all users were equally informed of the updates was difficult, and without the updates, some players would be unable to participate in multiplayer modes. Valve built the Steam software client originally to serve these updates automatically for their games, but over time, it became a digital storefront that users could also purchase games through.[115] For indie games, Steam started curating third-party titles (including some indies) onto the service by 2005, later adding Steam Greenlight in 2012 that allowed any developer to propose their game for addition onto the service to the userbase, and ultimately replacing Greenlight with Steam Direct in 2017 where any developer can add their game to the service for a small fee.

While Steam remains the largest digital storefront for personal computer distribution, a number of other storefronts have opened since, with Itch.io, established in 2013, more focused on serving indie games over mainstream ones, providing the develop with store pages and other tools to help with marketing. Others serve more as digital retailers, giving tools to the indie developer to be able to accept and redeem online purchases and distribute the game, such as Humble Bundle, but otherwise leaving the marketing to the developer.[116]

On consoles, the distribution of an indie game is handled by the console's game store, once the developer has been approved by the console manufacturer. Similarly for mobile, the distribution of the game is handled by the app store provider once the developer has been approved to release apps on that type of device. In either case, all aspects of payment, redemption and distribution are handled at the manufacturer/app store provider level.[117]

A recent trend for some of the more popular indies is a limited physical release, typical for console-based versions. The distributor Limited Run Games was formed to produce limited runs of games, most commonly successful indie titles that have a proven following that would have a market for a physical edition. These versions are typically produced as special editions with additional physical products like art books, stickers, and other small items in the game's case.

In nearly all cases with digital distribution, the distribution platform takes a revenue cut of each sale with the rest of the sale going to the developer, as a means to pay for the costs of maintaining the digital storefront.

Industry

Most indie games do not make a significant profit, and only a handful have made large profits.[118] Instead, indie games are generally seen as a career stepping stone rather than a commercial opportunity.[45] The Dunning–Kruger effect has been shown to apply to indie games: some people with little experience have been able to develop successful games from the start, but for most, it takes upwards of ten years of experience within the industry before one regularly starts making games with financial success. Most in the industry caution that indie games should not be seen a financially-rewarding career for this reason.[119]

The industry perception towards indie games have also shifted, making the tactics of how to develop and market indie games difficult in contrast to AAA games. In 2008, a developer could earn around 17% of a game's retail price, and around 85% if sold digitally.[25] This can lead to the appearance of more "risky" creative projects.[25] Furthermore, the expansion of social websites has introduced gaming to casual gamers.[3] Recent years have brought the importance of drawing social media influencers to help promote indie games as well.[120]

There is contention as to how prominent indie video game development is in the video game industry.[21] Most games are not widely known or successful, and mainstream media attention remains with mainstream titles.[121][3] This can be attributed to a lack of marketing for indie games,[121] but indie games can be targeted at niche markets.[9][24]

Community
The Independent Games Festival exposition during the 2013 Game Developers Conference in San Francisco, California, where indie developers can showcase their games to attendees

Indie developers are generally considered a highly collaborative community with development teams sharing knowledge between each other, providing testing, technical support, and feedback, as generally indie developers are not in any direct competition with each other once they have achieved funding for their project. Indie developers also tend to open with their target player community, using beta testing and early access to get feedback, and engaging users regularly through storefront pages and communication channels such as Discord.[122]

Indie game developers can be involved with various indie game trade shows, such as Independent Games Festival, held alongside the Game Developers Conference, and IndieCade held prior to the annual E3 convention.[2][123] The Indie Megabooth was established in 2012 as a large showcase at various trade shows to allow indie developers to show off their titles. These events act as intermediaries between indie developers and the larger industry, as they present the abilities to connect with larger developers and publishers for business opportunities, as well as to get word of their games out to the press prior to release.[124]

Game jams, including Ludum Dare, the Indie Game Jam, the Nordic Game Jam, and the Global Game Jam, are typically annual competitions in which game developers are given a theme, concept and/or specific requirements and given a limited amount of time, on the order of a few days, to come up with a game prototype to submit for review and voting by judges, with the potential to win small cash prizes.[125][126][127][128] Companies can also have internal game jams as a means to relief stress which may generate ideas for future games, as notably the case for Double Fine and its Amnesia Fortnights. The structure of such jams can influence whether the end games are more experimental or serious, and whether they are to be more playful or more expressive.[129] While many game jam prototype go no further, some developers have subsequently expanded the prototype into a full release after the game jam into successful indie games, such as Superhot, Super Time Force, Gods Will Be Watching, Surgeon Simulator, and Goat Simulator.[130]

Impact

Indie games are recognized for helping to generate or revitalize video game genres, bringing new ideas to either stagnant gameplay concepts or creating whole new experiences. The expansion of roguelikes from ASCII, tile-based hack-and-slash games to a wide variety of so-called "rogue-lites" that maintain the roguelike procedural generation and permadeath features bore out directly from indie games Strange Adventures in Infinite Space (2002) and its sequel Weird Worlds: Return to Infinite Space (2005), Spelunky (2008), The Binding of Isaac (2011), FTL: Faster Than Light (2012) and Rogue Legacy (2012).[131] Metroidvanias resurged following the releases of Cave Story (2004) and Shadow Complex (2009).[80] Art games have gained attention through indie developers with early indie titles such as Samorost (2003)[132] and The Endless Forest (2005).[133]


See also

References
  1. Dutton, Fred (2012-04-18). "What is Indie?". Eurogamer. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
  2. Gnade, Mike (July 15, 2010). "What Exactly is an Indie Game?". The Indie Game Magazine. Archived from the original on September 22, 2013. Retrieved January 9, 2011.
  3. Gril, Juan (April 30, 2008). "The State of Indie Gaming". Gamasutra. Retrieved January 14, 2011.
  4. MacDonald, Dan (May 3, 2005). "Understanding "Independent"". Game Tunnel. Archived from the original on June 15, 2009. Retrieved January 18, 2011.
  5. Thomsen, Michael (January 25, 2011). "The 'Indie' Delusion: The Gaming Category that Doesn't Exist". IGN. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  6. Parker, Laura (2011-02-13). "The Rise of the Indie Developer". GameSpot. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
  7. Gril, Juan (2008-04-30). "The State of Indie Gaming". Gamasutra. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
  8. McGuire & Jenkins 2009, p. 27; Moore & Novak 2010, p. 272; Bates 2004, p. 252;
  9. Carroll, Russell (June 14, 2004). "Indie Innovation?". GameTunnel. Archived from the original on June 15, 2009. Retrieved February 7, 2011.
  10. MARCELO PRINCE, PETER ROTH (2004-12-21). "Videogame Publishers Place Big Bets on Big-Budget Games". Wall Street Journal Online. Retrieved 2013-07-01. The jump in development and marketing costs has made the videogame industry "enormously risk averse,[...]Publishers have largely focused on making sequels to successful titles or games based on movie or comic book characters, which are seen as less risky. "We don't green light any more things that will be small or average size games.[...]"
  11. McGuire & Jenkins 2009, p. 27; Moore & Novak 2010, p. 272; Bates 2004, p. 252; Iuppa & Borst 2009, p. 10
  12. Parker, Laura (February 14, 2011). "The Rise of the Indie Developer". GameSpot. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  13. Kelly, Kevin (March 17, 2009). "SXSW 2009: Being Indie and Successful in the Video Game Industry". Joystiq. Retrieved February 4, 2011.
  14. Bethke 2003, p. 102.
  15. Crossley, Rob (May 19, 2009). "Indie game studios 'will always be more creative'". MCV. Retrieved January 18, 2011.
  16. Cook, Dave (May 13, 2014). "Why Supergiant ditched publishers for the release of Transistor – interview". VG247. Retrieved April 26, 2016.
  17. Winchester, Herny (November 14, 2011). "Bastion developer talks indie publishing". PC Gamer. Retrieved August 26, 2015.
  18. Conditt, Jessica (January 21, 2016). "Traveling through time with 'Braid' creator Jonathan Blow". Engadget. AOL Tech. Retrieved January 21, 2016.
  19. Kamen, Matt (2016-03-04). "No Man's Sky director: 'everything is to the wire, we work all night'". Wired UK. Retrieved 2016-03-04.
  20. Garda, Maria B.; Grabarczyk, Paweł (October 2016). "Is Every Indie Game Independent? Towards the Concept of Independent Game". Game Studies. 16 (1). ISSN 1604-7982.
  21. Diamante, Vince (March 7, 2007). "GDC: The Future of Indie Games". Gamasutra. Retrieved January 18, 2011.
  22. Gamasutra staff (October 4, 2007). "Q&A: Independent Game Creators On Importance Of Indie Movement". Gamasutra. Retrieved February 25, 2011.
  23. McGuire & Jenkins 2009, p. 27
  24. Cobbett, Richard (September 19, 2010). "Is indie gaming the future?". TechRadar. p. 1. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  25. Irwin, Mary Jane (November 20, 2008). "Indie Game Developers Rise Up". Forbes. Retrieved January 10, 2011.
  26. Diamante, Vincent (March 6, 2007). "GDC: Analyzing Innovation in Indie Games". Gamasutra. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  27. Kunzelman, Cameron (January 15, 2020). "What Does It Really Mean to Be an Indie Game?". Vice. Retrieved January 15, 2020.
  28. Clark, Ryan (September 8, 2015). "The 5 Myths of the Indiepocalypse". Gamasutra. Retrieved December 14, 2017.
  29. Newman, Jared (March 31, 2017). "How Itch.io became an indie PC game haven—and Steam's antithesis". PC World. Retrieved December 14, 2017.
  30. Iuppa, Nick; Borst, Terry; Simpson, Chris (2012). End-to-End Game Development: Creating Independent Serious Games and Simulations from Start to Finish. CRC Press. p. 10.
  31. Jacevic, Milan (2018). Indie Game: The Movie: The Paper – Documentary Films and the Subfield of Independent Games. Proceedings of DiGRA 2018.
  32. Cobbett, Richard (September 22, 2017). "From shareware superstars to the Steam gold rush: How indie conquered the PC". PC Gamer. Retrieved September 25, 2017.
  33. Parker, Felan (2013). Indie Game Studies Year Eleven. Proceedings of DiGRA 2013: DeFragging Game Studies. Digital Games Research Association.
  34. McGuire & Jenkins 2009, p. 27.
  35. Juul, Jesper (November 15, 2019). "The indie explosion that's been going on for 30 years (give or take)". Polygon. Retrieved November 15, 2019.
  36. Edwards, Benj (2017-10-27). "Rediscovering History's Lost First Female Video Game Designer". Fast Company. Retrieved 2017-10-27.
  37. McCracken, Harry (April 29, 2014). "Fifty Years of BASIC, the Programming Language That Made Computers Personal". Time. Retrieved August 24, 2020.
  38. "Death of the bedroom coder". The Guardian. 24 January 2004. Retrieved 30 September 2019.
  39. Izushi, Hiro; Aoyama, Yuko (2006). "Industry evolution and cross-sectoral skill transfers: a comparative analysis of the video game industry in Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom". Environment and Planning A. 38 (10): 1843–1861. doi:10.1068/a37205. S2CID 143373406.
  40. Darling, Sharon (February 1985). "Birth of a Computer Game". Compute!. p. 48. Retrieved 6 October 2013.
  41. Baker, Chris (6 August 2010). "Sinclair ZX80 and the Dawn of 'Surreal' U.K. Game Industry". Wired. Retrieved 30 September 2019.
  42. Donlan, Christian (26 July 2012). "Manic Miner 360: Revisiting a Classic". Eurogamer. Retrieved 30 September 2019.
  43. MARCELO PRINCE, PETER ROTH (2004-12-21). "Videogame Publishers Place Big Bets on Big-Budget Games". Wallstreet journal Online. Retrieved 2013-07-01. The jump in development and marketing costs has made the videogame industry "enormously risk averse,[...]Publishers have largely focused on making sequels to successful titles or games based on movie or comic book characters, which are seen as less risky. "We don't green light any more things that will be small or average size games.[...]"
  44. Chandler 2009, p. xxi
  45. Iuppa & Borst 2009, p. 10.
  46. Blake, Michael (June 22, 2011). "PC Gaming: Doomed? or zDoomed? - Some of the most rewarding PC games out there were built by indie developers using open source code". IGN. Retrieved September 25, 2017.
  47. "The Independent Game Development Boom: Interview with Stephanie Barish, CEO of IndieCade". New York Film Academy. October 22, 2014. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  48. Takatsuki, Yo (December 27, 2007). "Cost headache for game developers". BBC. Retrieved August 31, 2020.
  49. Bearman, Joshuah (November 13, 2009). "Can D.I.Y. Supplant the First-Person Shooter?". The New York Times. Retrieved January 20, 2020.
  50. Mysore, Sahana (January 2, 2009). "How the World of Goo became one of the indie video game hits of 2008". Venture Beat. Retrieved January 29, 2020.
  51. Rose, Mike (November 19, 2013). "How indies made an impact on a generation of game consoles". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  52. Bearman, Joshuah (November 15, 2009). "Can D.I.Y. Supplant the First-Person Shooter?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved September 23, 2015.
  53. Grubb, Jeff (February 14, 2012). "How Fez's first-day sales compare to Braid, Limbo, and other XBLA hits". Venture Beat. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  54. Chaplin, Heather (August 27, 2008). "Xbox's 'Braid' A Surprise Hit, For Surprising Reasons". NPR. Retrieved February 4, 2011.
  55. Smith, Graham (March 5, 2018). "Boutique publishers are the future of the indie games market". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  56. Webster, Andrew (April 4, 2018). "Indie game publishers are the new indie rock labels". The Verge. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  57. Plunkett, Luke (January 4, 2011). "Why Minecraft Is So Damn Popular". Kotaku. Retrieved February 4, 2011.
  58. Faber, Tom (July 15, 2019). "Cats, cancer and mental breakdown: the unexpected joys of indie games". Financial Times. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
  59. Wright, Steven (September 28, 2018). "There are too many video games. What now?". Polygon. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  60. McAloone, Alissa (January 10, 2018). "7,672 games hit Steam in 2017 alone, says Steam Spy". Gamasutra. Archived from the original on January 11, 2018. Retrieved January 10, 2018.
  61. Calvin, Alex (January 14, 2019). "There are now over 27,000 games on Steam". PC Games Insider.biz. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  62. Calvin, Alex (January 2, 2020). "Over 8,000 games were released on Steam in 2019, according to SteamSpy". PCGamesInsider.biz. Retrieved January 2, 2020.
  63. Graft, Kris (December 10, 2015). "The 5 trends that defined the game industry in 2015". Gamasutra. Retrieved December 10, 2015.
  64. Wawro, Alex (March 15, 2016). "Devs share real talk about surviving the latest 'indiepocalypse'". Gamasutra. Retrieved March 15, 2016.
  65. Pearson, Dan (April 13, 2016). "Every year has been better than the last. Thriving is the best way to put it". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved April 13, 2016.
  66. Graft, Kris (December 13, 2016). "The 5 trends that defined the game industry in 2016". Gamasutra. Retrieved December 13, 2016.
  67. Heller, Emily (2018-12-17). "GOTY 2018: #5 Celeste". Polygon. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  68. Bycer, Josh (October 15, 2019). "The Problem of the Indie Game Pedestal". Gamasutra. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  69. Muncy, Julie (15 August 2017). "ONE YEAR LATER, NO MAN'S SKY—AND ITS EVOLUTION—IS WORTH EXPLORING". Wired. Retrieved 17 August 2017.
  70. Valentine, Rebekah (July 19, 2019). "Indies on Steam are betting on discoverability". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  71. West, Daniel (September 8, 2015). "'Good' isn't good enough - releasing an indie game in 2015". Gamasutra. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  72. Nelson Jr., Xalavier (March 12, 2019). "How it feels to release an indie game in 2019". Polygon. Retrieved October 15, 2019.
  73. Orland, Kyle (July 6, 2018). "Valve leaks Steam game player counts; we have the numbers". Ars Technica. Condé Nast. Archived from the original on July 10, 2018. Retrieved July 11, 2018. Complete list. Archived July 11, 2018, at the Wayback Machine
  74. Nunneley, Stephany (January 23, 2020). "Stardew Valley has sold over 10 million copies worldwide". VG247. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
  75. Grubb, Jeff (September 30, 2019). "Cuphead surpasses 5 million copies sold". Venture Beat. Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  76. Ito, Kenji (2005). Possibilities of Non-Commercial Games: The Case of Amateur Role Playing Games Designers in Japan. Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play. Digital Games Research Association.
  77. Ellison, Cara (October 1, 2014). "Dōjin nation: does 'indie' gaming really exist in Japan?". The Guardian. Retrieved February 1, 2020.
  78. Ellison, Cara (October 1, 2014). "Dōjin nation: does 'indie' gaming really exist in Japan?". The Guardian. Retrieved February 1, 2020.
  79. Greenwald, Will (April 12, 2013). "Indie Game Developers Revive Platformers". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on March 15, 2015. Retrieved March 14, 2015.
  80. Nutt, Christian (February 13, 2015). "The undying allure of the Metroidvania". Gamasutra. Archived from the original on May 11, 2015. Retrieved February 13, 2015.
  81. Carter, Ben (August 11, 2011). "Opinion: Comic Market And Indie Games In Japan". Gamasutra. Retrieved February 1, 2020.
  82. Tom Goldman (2010-10-01). "Steam's First Indie JRPG Is a Hit". The Escapist. Retrieved 2010-12-21.
  83. Fiadotau, Mikhail (2017). "Indie and dōjin games: a cross-cultural comparison". Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association 2017 Conference (DiGRA'17): 1–2 – via Academia.edu.
  84. Fiadotau, Mikhail (2019). "Indie and Dōjin Games: A Multilayered Cross-Cultural Comparison" (PDF). Gamevironments. 10: 34–84. Retrieved February 1, 2020.
  85. Ramée, Jordan (July 28, 2018). "The 14 Best Games Developed By Only One Person". GameSpot. Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  86. Gordon, Lewis (October 9, 2019). "Indie Game Makers Open Up About The Money They Actually Make". The Verge. Retrieved January 28, 2020.
  87. Casamassina, Matt (October 22, 2009). "And Yet It Moves To WiiWare". IGN.
  88. Andrew Hayward (2012-10-12). "Coding and coexisting in the corral: How Octodad's team manages living and working together". Joystiq. Retrieved 2015-06-13.
  89. Tach, Dave (August 23, 2013). "Risk of Rain hands-on: Retro agoraphobia". Polygon. Retrieved January 23, 2014.
  90. Cameron, Phill (January 27, 2015). "Road to the IGF: Alex Beachum's Outer Wilds". Gamasutra. UBM plc. Archived from the original on March 11, 2015. Retrieved March 11, 2015.
  91. Sarkar, Samit (14 February 2014). "Vlambeer: Just making games is the key to becoming successful". Polygon. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
  92. CjnLion (May 10, 2012). "Kickstart to Lightspeed – An FTL Interview". Destructoid. Retrieved September 20, 2012.
  93. Edge Staff (January 20, 2014). "The Making Of: Papers, Please". Edge. Archived from the original on January 22, 2014.
  94. Graft, Kris (February 8, 2016). "Road to the IGF: Red Hook Studios' Darkest Dungeon". Gamasutra. Retrieved February 8, 2016.
  95. Mahardy, Mike (13 August 2013). "Meet Me In Portland: The Fullbright Company's Journey Home". Polygon. Retrieved 16 August 2018.
  96. Martin, Chase Bowen; Deuze, Mark (July 2009). "The Independent Production of Culture: A Digital Games Case Study". Games & Culture. 4 (3): 276–295. doi:10.1177/1555412009339732. S2CID 8568117.
  97. Doull, Andrew (February 6, 2008). "Opinion: Amateur vs Indie Games - The War?". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 31, 2020.
  98. Totilo, Stephen (August 8, 2007). ""A Higher Standard" — Game Designer Jonathan Blow Challenges Super Mario's Gold Coins, "Unethical" MMO Design And Everything Else You May Hold Dear About Video Games". MTV. Archived from the original on March 16, 2010. Retrieved February 19, 2009.
  99. McMillen, Edmund; Refenes, Tommy (2011-04-14). "Postmortem: Team Meat's Super Meat Boy". Gamasutra. p. 1. Archived from the original on 2011-05-07. Retrieved 2011-04-14.
  100. Adams, Tarn (27 February 2008). "Interview: The Making Of Dwarf Fortress". Gamasutra (Interview). Interviewed by Josh Harris. Archived from the original on 2013-11-12. Retrieved 17 April 2014.
  101. Feeld, Julian (October 9, 2015). "INTERVIEW: TOBY FOX OF UNDERTALE". Existential Gamer. Feeld. Archived from the original on January 20, 2016. Retrieved January 20, 2016.
  102. Safarov, Tom (December 12, 2019). "Tips for working with a game art outsourcing studio and avoiding the typical roadblocks on the way". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 28, 2020.
  103. Lipkin, Nadav (December 31, 2012). "Examining Indie's Independence: The Meaning of "Indie" Games, the Politics of Production, and Mainstream Co-optation". Loading... The Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association. 7 (11): 8–24.
  104. Orland, Kyle (23 July 2012). "How certification requirements are holding back console gaming". Ars Technica.
  105. Thompson, Michael (January 18, 2010). "Searching for gold: how to fund your indie video game". Ars Technica. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  106. Hietalahti, Juuso (May 19, 2006). "The Basic Marketing Plan For Indie Games". Gamasutra. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  107. Marsh, David (February 26, 2008). "Nine Paths To Indie Game Greatness". Gamasutra. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  108. Strebeck, Zachary (August 21, 2015). "How do I get funding for my indie game company?". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 24, 2020.
  109. Futter, Michael (March 18, 2019). "The Changing Face of Video Game Crowdfunding". Variety. Retrieved August 24, 2020.
  110. Green, Holly (June 24, 2016). "7 successful Early Access games that all developers should study". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 24, 2020.
  111. Orland, Kyle (April 6, 2011). "Minecraft Draws Over $33 Million In Revenue From 1.8M Paying Customers". Gamasutra. Retrieved October 16, 2013.
  112. Diaz, Ana (May 13, 2020). "How Public Arts Funding Helps Developers Make Unique, More Diverse Games". The Verge. Retrieved August 24, 2020.
  113. Smith, Ernie (November 1, 2016). "The Story of Shareware, the Original In-App Purchase". Vice. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  114. Brinbaum, Ian (May 30, 2014). "End of days: GameSpy's forgotten games and the gamers keeping them alive". PC Gamer. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  115. Case, Loyd (March 22, 2002). "Valve Changes Online Gaming Rules". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on March 2, 2016. Retrieved February 14, 2016.
  116. Fenlon, Wes; Wilde, Tyler (July 12, 2019). "PC game storefronts compared: what you need to know about retailers and resellers". PC Gamer. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  117. Henges, Liz (June 19, 2020). "Examining the indie ins and outs of today's game distribution platforms". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
  118. Jan, Matej (June 27, 2012). "Congratulations, Your First Indie Game is a Flop". Gamasutra. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  119. Warner, John (October 2, 2018). "It's time we stopped encouraging indies". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved August 28, 2020.
  120. Fahey, Rob (April 15, 2016). "What causes indie games to fail?". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  121. Taylor, Paul (August 26, 2009). "Building Buzz for Indie Games". Gamasutra. p. 1. Retrieved February 24, 2011.
  122. Guevara-Villalobos, Orlando (2011). Cultures of independent game production: Examining the relationship between community and labour. Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play.
  123. Edge Staff (October 10, 2008). "Driving Indie Games From Margin to Center". Edge Online. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  124. Parker, Felan; Whitson, Jennifer R; Simon, Bart (2017). "Megabooth: The cultural intermediation of indie games". New Media & Society. 20 (5): 1953–1972. doi:10.1177/1461444817711403. PMC 6256716. PMID 30581359.
  125. Adams, Ernest W. (May 31, 2002). "Technology Inspires Creativity: Indie Game Jam Inverts Dogma 2001!". Gamasutra. Retrieved March 8, 2011.
  126. Jacobs, Stephen (February 25, 2009). "Global Game Jam 2009: A Worldwide Report". Gamasutra. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  127. Fullerton, Swain & Hoffman 2008, p. 403
  128. Thompson, Berbank-Green & Cusworth 2007, p. 83.
  129. Goddard, William; Byrne, Richard; Mueller, Florian Floyd (2014). Playful game jams: guidelines for designed outcomes. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment. pp. 1–10.
  130. Francis, Bryant (August 25, 2017). "Crucial lessons from 7 game jam prototypes that went commercial". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 27, 2020.
  131. Nutt, Christian (May 21, 2014). "'Roguelikes': Getting to the heart of the it-genre". Gamasutra. Retrieved August 30, 2014.
  132. Ploug, Kristine (2005-12-01). "Art Games - An Introduction". Artificial.dk. Retrieved 2012-11-15.
  133. Carless, Simon (6 November 2007). "The Endless Play Of The Endless Forest". GameSetWatch. Retrieved August 31, 2020.

Literature
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.