1986 California Proposition 64

Proposition 64 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 4, 1986 ballot. It was an initiative statute that would have restored Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) to the list of communicable diseases. The measure was defeated by a margin of 71% to 29%.

"PANIC" redirects here. For the sensation of fear, see Panic. For other uses, see Panic (disambiguation).
Elections in California
Federal government
U.S. President
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
State government (executive)
Governor
Lieutenant governor
Attorney General
Secretary of State
Treasurer
Controller
Insurance Commissioner
Superintendent of Public Instruction
State Board of Equalization
State government (legislative)
State Senate
State Assembly
State government (judicial)
Court of Appeals
Propositions
1910–1919
1960–1969
1970–1979
1980–1989
1990–1999
2000–2009
2010–2019
2020–2029
Full list
Elections by year
State elections
Anaheim
Mayor
Bakersfield
Mayoral elections
Fresno
Mayor
Irvine
Mayoral elections
Long Beach
Mayor
Los Angeles
Mayor
General
City Attorney
Board of Supervisors
Oakland
Mayor
Riverside
Mayor
Sacramento
Mayor
San Bernardino
Mayor
San Diego
Mayor
City Attorney
Municipal elections
Board of Supervisors
San Francisco
Mayor
Board of Supervisors
General elections
San Jose
Mayor
Stockton
Mayoral elections

Activists associated with Lyndon LaRouche formed the "Prevent AIDS Now Initiative Committee" (PANIC) to place what became "Proposition 64" on the California state ballot. The initiative was written by Khushro Ghandhi.[1] who was also the president of PANIC. Brian Lantz was vice-president[2] and Ted Andromidas was treasurer[3]

The initiative

Proponents argued that the measures would merely return AIDS to the list of communicable diseases under the public health laws. The ballot argument in favor of the proposition were pathologist John Grauerholz, psychiatrist Nancy T. Mullan, and former Centers for Disease Control advisor Gus S. Sermos.[4] Congressman William E. Dannemeyer was also a proponent.

Opponents characterized it as an effort to force HIV-positive individuals out of their jobs and into quarantine. Said Helen Miramontes, R.N., president of the California Nurses Association:

Health professionals believe that Proposition 64 would seriously hurt their ability to treat and find a cure for AIDS. Current medical efforts based on years of research will be undermined by the fear generated by this irrational proposition.

The ballot argument against the measure was signed by Gladden V. Elliott, president of the California Medical Association, Congressman Ed Zschau, and Senator Alan Cranston. The submitted supporting argument included claims that AIDS could be transmitted by insects, respiratory means and casual contact.[4] These claims were challenged in a suit by California Secretary of State March Fong Eu, based on the argument that they had no scientific support.[4]

The initiative was opposed by the Catholic Bishops of California.[5]

In 1988, the text of Proposition 64 was re-introduced in California by the "Prevent AIDS Now In California" (also PANIC) committee and appeared on the June 1988 ballot as "Proposition 69." It was also defeated.

The gathering of signatures to qualify the initiative was handled in part by a paid contractor. The fee was paid with a contribution by the Caucus Distributors Inc, a key part of the LaRouche movement.[6] The political consultant who was hired by the LaRouche organization to collect signatures for the PANIC initiative was convicted of fraud in October 1988. The consultant, Stanley I. Dale, used out-of-state signature-collectors and claimed they were California residents.[7] March Fong Eu, Secretary of State of California, notified the committee that her office had received numerous complaints of harassment by signature gatherers, including "outrageous verbal abuse for mere failure to sign petitions". She warned them that further complaints would result in legal action.[8]

LaRouche activists accused official agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control of "criminal malfeasance" for refusing to back measures such as mandatory testing.[9]

See also

References
  1. "The State AIDS Test Measure Near OK for Ballot", Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif.: Jun 23, 1986. pg. 2
  2. "Probe of LaRouche Initiative On AIDS Turns to East Bay;" Edward Iwata. San Francisco Chronicle (pre-1997 Fulltext). San Francisco, Calif.: Jul 25, 1986. pg. 14
  3. "Backers of AIDS quarantine boost initiative drive," Bill Callahan. The Tribune. San Diego, Calif.: Feb 6, 1986. pg. B.12.3.
  4. "Proposition 64 Text, analysis, and arguments" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-16. Retrieved 2009-05-23.
  5. Hyer, Marorie (October 31, 1986). "Bishop Urges Church Action On AIDS Care". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 25, 2020.
  6. "Strange Twists Mark Prop. 64 Campaign;" KEVIN RODERICK. Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif.: Oct 30, 1986. pg. 25
  7. "Jail for Promoter of 1986 AIDS Initiative" Archived 2012-02-05 at the Wayback Machine United Press International (10/31/88)
  8. "AIDS-Control Backers Get Warning From Eu;" San Francisco Chronicle.San Francisco, Calif.: May 20, 1986. pg. 11
  9. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2005-02-09. Retrieved 2005-01-18.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.