2020 California elections

California, a stronghold for the Democratic Party, has 55 electoral votes in the Electoral College. Joe Biden won with 63% of the popular vote. On December 14, 2020, California cast its electoral votes for Joe Biden.[2]

There are 53 U.S. Representatives in California that were all up for election. The Democratic Party won 42 seats while the Republican Party won 11 seats. Three districts were gained by the Republican Party: the 21st, 39th, and 48th.

The 20 California State Senators in the odd-numbered districts were up for election. Out of the contested seats, Democrats won 17 and Republicans won 3. The resulting composition was 31 Democrats and 9 Republicans. Two districts were gained by the Democratic Party: the 29th and 37th.

All 80 representatives in the California State Assembly were up for election. The resulting composition was 60 Democrats, 19 Republicans, and one independent. The Republican Party gained the 38th district.

Since the passage of a November 2011 law, only propositions placed on the ballot by the state legislature may appear on the primary ballot, and all qualifying measures placed via petition are automatically moved to the general election ballot.[3]

Primary election

• Proposition 13: Public Preschool, K-12, and College Health and Safety Bond Act of 2020 (Assembly Bill 48) - Failed

Prop 13 was a $15 billion bond measure to fund seismic retrofitting and other capital improvements on various California public preschool, K-12, and college campuses.[4] Supporters argued that these improvements would make public schools safer and healthier. Opponents said that the actual total cost of the bonds plus interest would exceed $27 billion, more expensive than using funds directly from the regular state budget.[5]

Proposition 13[6]

Choice	Votes	%
No	4,856,154	53.0
Yes	4,304,013	47.0
Total votes	9,160,167	100.00

General election

• Proposition 14
  • Stem Cell Research, Treatments, and Cures Initiative. Initiative Statute. This will authorize $5.5 billion in bonds to help fund various grants issued by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, specifically for stem cell and other medical research, medical training, and the construction of new research facilities.[7][8]

Proposition 14

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	8,588,156	51.12
No	8,211,692	48.88
Total votes	16,799,848	100.00

• Proposition 15
  • Schools and Local Communities Funding Act. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. This will increases funding for K-12 public schools, community colleges, and local governments by amending portions of 1978's Proposition 13, requiring commercial and industrial properties to be taxed based on current market value instead of their purchase price. Exempts those owners with a combined value of $3 million or less, small businesses from personal property taxes, and $500,000 worth of personal property of non-small businesses.[7][9] This initiative failed by a margin of four percentage points.[10]

Proposition 15

Choice	Votes	%
No	8,885,052	51.97
Yes	8,212,641	48.03
Total votes	17,097,693	100.00

• Proposition 16
  • Assembly Constitutional Amendment 5. This mandatory proposition, placed by the state legislature and the Governor, will repeal 1996's Proposition 209. Proposition 209 prohibits the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.[7][11] This initiative was rejected by a margin of 12 percentage points.[10]

Proposition 16

Choice	Votes	%
No	9,655,024	57.23
Yes	7,216,721	42.77
Total votes	16,871,745	100.00

• Proposition 17
  • Assembly Constitutional Amendment 6. This mandatory proposition, placed by the state legislature and the Governor, will amend the state constitution to allow people with felonies who are on parole to vote.[7][12] This margin passed by a margin of 17 percentage points.[10]

Proposition 17

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	9,985,065	58.55
No	7,068,706	41.45
Total votes	17,053,771	100.00

• Proposition 18
  • Assembly Constitutional Amendment 4. This mandatory proposition, placed by the state legislature and the Governor, will amend the state constitution to allow 17-year-olds to vote in primary and special elections if they will turn 18 by the subsequent general election.[7][13] This initiative failed by a margin of ten percentage points.[10]

Proposition 18

Choice	Votes	%
No	9,577,238	56.04
Yes	7,513,957	43.96
Total votes	17,091,195	100.00

• Proposition 19
  • Assembly Constitutional Amendment 11. This mandatory proposition, placed by the state legislature and the Governor, will amend the state constitution, specifically portions of 1978's Proposition 13 by allowing homeowners who are over 55 years old or severely disabled to transfer their property tax base from their old home to their new one, regardless of the new residence's property value or location. The property tax base can be transferred up to three times instead of one. The proposition will require that inherited homes that are not used as principal residences be reassessed at market value when transferred. Revenue generated from these provisions will be allocated to wildfire agencies and counties.[7][14]

Proposition 19

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	8,545,393	51.11
No	8,175,618	48.89
Total votes	16,721,011	100.00

• Proposition 20
  • Reducing Crime and Keeping California Safe Act. Initiative Statute. This proposition will, among others, expand the list of crimes that do not allow early parole, recategorizes particular misdemeanor crimes as instead ones that are chargeable as either misdemeanors or felonies, and require the collection DNA samples from anybody convicted of particular misdemeanors.[7][15] California voters decisively rejected this initiative by a margin of 24 percentage points.[10]

Proposition 20

Choice	Votes	%
No	10,293,563	61.72
Yes	6,385,421	38.28
Total votes	16,678,984	100.00

• Proposition 21
  • Rent Affordability. Initiative Statute. Would allow local governments to establish rent control on residential properties that have been occupied for over 15 years. Would also allow landlords who own no more than two homes to exempt themselves from these new policies. This would essentially repeal some of the provisions in the 1995 Costa–Hawkins Rental Housing Act.[7][16] California voters rejected this initiative by a margin of 20 percentage points.[10]

Proposition 21

Choice	Votes	%
No	10,094,634	59.85
Yes	6,770,958	40.15
Total votes	16,865,592	100.00

• Proposition 22
  • Protect-App-Based Drivers and Services Act. Initiative Statute. This proposition will define all app-based transportation (rideshare) and delivery drivers as independent contractors for the purposes of labor and wage laws. This would override 2019's Assembly Bill 5, which implemented a three-part test to determine whether such a driver should be classified as an independent contractor or an employee.[7][17] This measure passed by a margin of 16 percentage points.[10]

Proposition 22

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	9,957,858	58.63
No	7,027,467	41.37
Total votes	16,985,325	100.00

• Proposition 23
  • Protect the Lives of Dialysis Patients Act. Initiative Statute. This proposition will require chronic dialysis clinics to have at least one on-site licensed physician while patients are being treated, report dialysis-related infection data to both the state health department and the federal CDC, gain approval from the state health department before closing a clinic, and to not discriminate against patients based on their source of payment for care, among others.[7][18] California voters decisively rejected this initiative by 28 percentage points.[10]

Proposition 23

Choice	Votes	%
No	10,683,606	63.42
Yes	6,161,109	36.58
Total votes	16,844,715	100.00

• Proposition 24
  • Privacy Rights and Enforcement Act. Initiative Statute. This propositions will expand provisions first implemented by the California Consumer Privacy Act. Among other additions, the proposition will allow customers to direct businesses from sharing their personal information and to make corrections to inaccurate personal information without any penalty. In addition, businesses will need to obtain permission before collecting data from consumers younger than 16, or permission from a parent or guardian before collecting data from consumers younger than 13. It will also establish a new state department called the California Privacy Protection Agency to enforce the consumer privacy laws.[7][19] This measure was approved by a margin of 12 percentage points.[10]

Proposition 24

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	9,384,125	56.23
No	7,305,026	43.77
Total votes	16,689,151	100.00

• Proposition 25
  • Referendum to Overturn a 2018 Law That Replaced Money Bail System with A System Based on Public Safety Risk. A referendum (placed on the ballot via petition) on Senate Bill 10 passed by the state legislature in 2018 that replaces the state's current cash bail system with a risk assessment-based bail system.[7][20] A majority of Californians voted no on this measure, which means that the previous system of cash bail will remain in place.[10]

Proposition 25

Choice	Votes	%
No	9,356,096	56.41
Yes	7,231,044	43.59
Total votes	16,587,140	100.00

• Katie Shepherd (October 12, 2020), "California GOP installed unofficial ballot drop-off boxes. State officials say they're illegal", Washingtonpost.com

• California Official Voter Information Guide