Hard disk drive

A hard disk drive (HDD), hard disk, hard drive, or fixed disk[lower-alpha 2] is an electro-mechanical data storage device that stores and retrieves digital data using magnetic storage and one or more rigid rapidly rotating platters coated with magnetic material. The platters are paired with magnetic heads, usually arranged on a moving actuator arm, which read and write data to the platter surfaces.[2] Data is accessed in a random-access manner, meaning that individual blocks of data can be stored and retrieved in any order. HDDs are a type of non-volatile storage, retaining stored data even when powered off.[3][4][5]

"Hard drive" redirects here. For other uses, see Hard drive (disambiguation).

Hard disk drive
Partially disassembled IBM 350 (RAMAC)
Date inventedDecember 24, 1954 (1954-12-24)[lower-alpha 1]
Invented byIBM team led by Rey Johnson
Internals of a 2.5-inch laptop hard disk drive
A disassembled and labeled 1997 HDD lying atop a mirror
Computer memory and data storage types
General
Volatile
RAM
Historical
Non-volatile
ROM
NVRAM
Early stage NVRAM
Analog recording
Optical
In development
Historical

Introduced by IBM in 1956,[6] HDDs were the dominant secondary storage device for general-purpose computers beginning in the early 1960s. HDDs maintained this position into the modern era of servers and personal computers, though personal computing devices produced in large volume, like cell phones and tablets, rely on flash products. More than 224 companies have produced HDDs historically, though after extensive industry consolidation most units are manufactured by Seagate, Toshiba, and Western Digital. HDDs dominate the volume of storage produced (exabytes per year) for servers. Though production is growing slowly (by exabytes shipped[7]), sales revenues and unit shipments are declining because solid-state drives (SSDs) have higher data-transfer rates, higher areal storage density, better reliability,[8] and much lower latency and access times.[9][10][11][12]

The revenues for SSDs, most of which use NAND flash memory, slightly exceed those for HDDs.[13] Flash storage products had more than twice the revenue of hard disk drives as of 2017.[14] Though SSDs have four to nine times higher cost per bit,[15][16] they are replacing HDDs in applications where speed, power consumption, small size, high capacity and durability are important.[11][12] Cost per bit for SSDs is falling, and the price premium over HDDs has narrowed.[16]

The primary characteristics of an HDD are its capacity and performance. Capacity is specified in unit prefixes corresponding to powers of 1000: a 1-terabyte (TB) drive has a capacity of 1,000 gigabytes (GB; where 1 gigabyte = 1 billion (109) bytes). Typically, some of an HDD's capacity is unavailable to the user because it is used by the file system and the computer operating system, and possibly inbuilt redundancy for error correction and recovery. Also there is confusion regarding storage capacity, since capacities are stated in decimal Gigabytes (powers of 10) by HDD manufacturers, whereas some operating systems report capacities in binary Gibibytes, which results in a smaller number than advertised. Performance is specified by the time required to move the heads to a track or cylinder (average access time) adding the time it takes for the desired sector to move under the head (average latency, which is a function of the physical rotational speed in revolutions per minute), and finally the speed at which the data is transmitted (data rate).

The two most common form factors for modern HDDs are 3.5-inch, for desktop computers, and 2.5-inch, primarily for laptops. HDDs are connected to systems by standard interface cables such as PATA (Parallel ATA), SATA (Serial ATA), USB or SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) cables.

History
Main article: History of hard disk drives
Improvement of HDD characteristics over time
ParameterStarted with (1957)Developed to (2019)Improvement
Capacity
(formatted)		3.75 megabytes[17]18 terabytes (as of 2020)[18]4.8-million-to-one[19]
Physical volume68 cubic feet (1.9 m3)[lower-alpha 3][6]2.1 cubic inches (34 cm3)[20][lower-alpha 4]56,000-to-one[21]
Weight2,000 pounds
(910 kg)[6]		2.2 ounces
(62 g)[20]		15,000-to-one[22]
Average access timeapprox. 600 milliseconds[6]2.5 ms to 10 ms; RW RAM dependentabout
200-to-one[23]
PriceUS$9,200 per megabyte (1961)[24]US$0.024 per gigabyte by 2020[25][26][27]383-million-to-one[28]
Data density2,000 bits per square inch[29]1.3 terabits per square inch in 2015[30]650-million-to-one[31]
Average lifespanc. 2000 hrs MTBFc. 2,500,000 hrs (~285 years) MTBF[32]1250-to-one[33]

The first production IBM hard disk drive, the 350 disk storage, shipped in 1957 as a component of the IBM 305 RAMAC system. It was approximately the size of two medium-sized refrigerators and stored five million six-bit characters (3.75 megabytes)[17] on a stack of 52 disks (100 surfaces used).[34] The 350 had a single arm with two read/write heads, one up and one down, that moved both horizontally across a pair of platters and vertically from one set of platters to a second set.[35][36][37] Variants of the IBM 350 were the IBM 355, IBM 7300 and IBM 1405.

In 1961 IBM announced, and in 1962 shipped, the IBM 1301 disk storage unit,[38] which superseded the IBM 350 and similar drives. The 1301 consisted of one (for Model 1) or two (for model 2) modules, each containg 25 platters, each platter about 1⁄8-inch (3.2 mm) thick and 24 inches (610 mm) in diameter.[39] While the earlier IBM disk drives used only two read/write heads per arm, the 1301 used an array of 48[lower-alpha 5] heads (comb), each array moving horizontally as a single unit, one head per surface used. Cylinder-mode read/write operations were supported, and the heads flew about 250 micro-inches (about 6 µm) above the platter surface. Motion of the head array depended upon a binary adder system of hydraulic actuators which assured repeatable positioning. The 1301 cabinet was about the size of three home refrigerators placed side by side, storing the equivalent of about 21 million eight-bit bytes per module. Access time was about a quarter of a second.

Also in 1962, IBM introduced the model 1311 disk drive, which was about the size of a washing machine and stored two million characters on a removable disk pack. Users could buy additional packs and interchange them as needed, much like reels of magnetic tape. Later models of removable pack drives, from IBM and others, became the norm in most computer installations and reached capacities of 300 megabytes by the early 1980s. Non-removable HDDs were called "fixed disk" drives.

In 1963 IBM introduced the 1302,[40] with twice the track capacity and twice as many tracks per cylinder as the 1301. The 1302 had one (for Model 1) or two (for Model 2) modules, each containing a separate comb for the first 250 tracks and the last 250 tracks.

Some high-performance HDDs were manufactured with one head per track, e.g., Burroughs B-475 in 1964, IBM 2305 in 1970, so that no time was lost physically moving the heads to a track and the only latency was the time for the desired block of data to rotate into position under the head.[41] Known as fixed-head or head-per-track disk drives, they were very expensive and are no longer in production.[42]

In 1973, IBM introduced a new type of HDD code-named "Winchester". Its primary distinguishing feature was that the disk heads were not withdrawn completely from the stack of disk platters when the drive was powered down. Instead, the heads were allowed to "land" on a special area of the disk surface upon spin-down, "taking off" again when the disk was later powered on. This greatly reduced the cost of the head actuator mechanism, but precluded removing just the disks from the drive as was done with the disk packs of the day. Instead, the first models of "Winchester technology" drives featured a removable disk module, which included both the disk pack and the head assembly, leaving the actuator motor in the drive upon removal. Later "Winchester" drives abandoned the removable media concept and returned to non-removable platters.

Like the first removable pack drive, the first "Winchester" drives used platters 14 inches (360 mm) in diameter. A few years later, designers were exploring the possibility that physically smaller platters might offer advantages. Drives with non-removable eight-inch platters appeared, and then drives that used a 5 1⁄4 in (130 mm) form factor (a mounting width equivalent to that used by contemporary floppy disk drives). The latter were primarily intended for the then-fledgling personal computer (PC) market.

As the 1980s began, HDDs were a rare and very expensive additional feature in PCs, but by the late 1980s their cost had been reduced to the point where they were standard on all but the cheapest computers.

Most HDDs in the early 1980s were sold to PC end users as an external, add-on subsystem. The subsystem was not sold under the drive manufacturer's name but under the subsystem manufacturer's name such as Corvus Systems and Tallgrass Technologies, or under the PC system manufacturer's name such as the Apple ProFile. The IBM PC/XT in 1983 included an internal 10 MB HDD, and soon thereafter internal HDDs proliferated on personal computers.

External HDDs remained popular for much longer on the Apple Macintosh. Many Macintosh computers made between 1986 and 1998 featured a SCSI port on the back, making external expansion simple. Older compact Macintosh computers did not have user-accessible hard drive bays (indeed, the Macintosh 128K, Macintosh 512K, and Macintosh Plus did not feature a hard drive bay at all), so on those models external SCSI disks were the only reasonable option for expanding upon any internal storage.

HDD improvements have been driven by increasing areal density, listed in the table above. Applications expanded through the 2000s, from the mainframe computers of the late 1950s to most mass storage applications including computers and consumer applications such as storage of entertainment content.

In the 2000s and 2010s, NAND began supplanting HDDs in applications requiring portability or high performance. NAND performance is improving faster than HDDs, and applications for HDDs are eroding. In 2018, the largest hard drive had a capacity of 15 TB, while the largest capacity SSD had a capacity of 100 TB.[43] As of 2018, HDDs were forecast to reach 100 TB capacities around 2025,[44] but as of 2019 the expected pace of improvement was pared back to 50 TB by 2026.[45] Smaller form factors, 1.8-inches and below, were discontinued around 2010. The cost of solid-state storage (NAND), represented by Moore's law, is improving faster than HDDs. NAND has a higher price elasticity of demand than HDDs, and this drives market growth.[46] During the late 2000s and 2010s, the product life cycle of HDDs entered a mature phase, and slowing sales may indicate the onset of the declining phase.[47]

The 2011 Thailand floods damaged the manufacturing plants and impacted hard disk drive cost adversely between 2011 and 2013.[48]

In 2019, Western Digital closed its last Malaysian HDD factory due to decreasing demand, to focus on SSD production.[49] All three remaining HDD manufacturers have had decreasing demand for their HDDs since 2014.[50]

Technology
Magnetic cross section & frequency modulation encoded binary data

Magnetic recording
See also: Magnetic storage

A modern HDD records data by magnetizing a thin film of ferromagnetic material[lower-alpha 6] on both sides of a disk. Sequential changes in the direction of magnetization represent binary data bits. The data is read from the disk by detecting the transitions in magnetization. User data is encoded using an encoding scheme, such as run-length limited encoding,[lower-alpha 7] which determines how the data is represented by the magnetic transitions.

A typical HDD design consists of a spindle that holds flat circular disks, called platters, which hold the recorded data. The platters are made from a non-magnetic material, usually aluminum alloy, glass, or ceramic. They are coated with a shallow layer of magnetic material typically 10–20 nm in depth, with an outer layer of carbon for protection.[52][53][54] For reference, a standard piece of copy paper is 0.07–0.18 mm (70,000–180,000 nm)[55] thick.

Destroyed hard disk, glass platter visible
Diagram labeling the major components of a computer HDD
Recording of single magnetisations of bits on a 200 MB HDD-platter (recording made visible using CMOS-MagView).[56]
Longitudinal recording (standard) & perpendicular recording diagram

The platters in contemporary HDDs are spun at speeds varying from 4,200 RPM in energy-efficient portable devices, to 15,000 rpm for high-performance servers.[57] The first HDDs spun at 1,200 rpm[6] and, for many years, 3,600 rpm was the norm.[58] As of November 2019, the platters in most consumer-grade HDDs spin at 5,400 or 7,200 RPM.

Information is written to and read from a platter as it rotates past devices called read-and-write heads that are positioned to operate very close to the magnetic surface, with their flying height often in the range of tens of nanometers. The read-and-write head is used to detect and modify the magnetization of the material passing immediately under it.

In modern drives, there is one head for each magnetic platter surface on the spindle, mounted on a common arm. An actuator arm (or access arm) moves the heads on an arc (roughly radially) across the platters as they spin, allowing each head to access almost the entire surface of the platter as it spins. The arm is moved using a voice coil actuator or in some older designs a stepper motor. Early hard disk drives wrote data at some constant bits per second, resulting in all tracks having the same amount of data per track but modern drives (since the 1990s) use zone bit recording – increasing the write speed from inner to outer zone and thereby storing more data per track in the outer zones.

In modern drives, the small size of the magnetic regions creates the danger that their magnetic state might be lost because of thermal effects⁠ ⁠— thermally induced magnetic instability which is commonly known as the "superparamagnetic limit". To counter this, the platters are coated with two parallel magnetic layers, separated by a three-atom layer of the non-magnetic element ruthenium, and the two layers are magnetized in opposite orientation, thus reinforcing each other.[59] Another technology used to overcome thermal effects to allow greater recording densities is perpendicular recording, first shipped in 2005,[60] and as of 2007 used in certain HDDs.[61][62][63]

In 2004, a higher-density recording media was introduced, consisting of coupled soft and hard magnetic layers. So-called exchange spring media magnetic storage technology, also known as exchange coupled composite media, allows good writability due to the write-assist nature of the soft layer. However, the thermal stability is determined only by the hardest layer and not influenced by the soft layer.[64][65]

Components
An HDD with disks and motor hub removed, exposing copper-colored stator coils surrounding a bearing in the center of the spindle motor. The orange stripe along the side of the arm is a thin printed-circuit cable, the spindle bearing is in the center and the actuator is in the upper left.

A typical HDD has two electric motors: a spindle motor that spins the disks and an actuator (motor) that positions the read/write head assembly across the spinning disks. The disk motor has an external rotor attached to the disks; the stator windings are fixed in place. Opposite the actuator at the end of the head support arm is the read-write head; thin printed-circuit cables connect the read-write heads to amplifier electronics mounted at the pivot of the actuator. The head support arm is very light, but also stiff; in modern drives, acceleration at the head reaches 550 g.

Head stack with an actuator coil on the left and read/write heads on the right
Close-up of a single read-write head, showing the side facing the platter

The actuator is a permanent magnet and moving coil motor that swings the heads to the desired position. A metal plate supports a squat neodymium-iron-boron (NIB) high-flux magnet. Beneath this plate is the moving coil, often referred to as the voice coil by analogy to the coil in loudspeakers, which is attached to the actuator hub, and beneath that is a second NIB magnet, mounted on the bottom plate of the motor (some drives have only one magnet).

The voice coil itself is shaped rather like an arrowhead and is made of doubly coated copper magnet wire. The inner layer is insulation, and the outer is thermoplastic, which bonds the coil together after it is wound on a form, making it self-supporting. The portions of the coil along the two sides of the arrowhead (which point to the center of the actuator bearing) then interact with the magnetic field of the fixed magnet. Current flowing radially outward along one side of the arrowhead and radially inward on the other produces the tangential force. If the magnetic field were uniform, each side would generate opposing forces that would cancel each other out. Therefore, the surface of the magnet is half north pole and half south pole, with the radial dividing line in the middle, causing the two sides of the coil to see opposite magnetic fields and produce forces that add instead of canceling. Currents along the top and bottom of the coil produce radial forces that do not rotate the head.

The HDD's electronics control the movement of the actuator and the rotation of the disk and perform reads and writes on demand from the disk controller. Feedback of the drive electronics is accomplished by means of special segments of the disk dedicated to servo feedback. These are either complete concentric circles (in the case of dedicated servo technology) or segments interspersed with real data (in the case of embedded servo technology). The servo feedback optimizes the signal-to-noise ratio of the GMR sensors by adjusting the voice coil of the actuated arm. The spinning of the disk also uses a servo motor. Modern disk firmware is capable of scheduling reads and writes efficiently on the platter surfaces and remapping sectors of the media which have failed.

Error rates and handling

Modern drives make extensive use of error correction codes (ECCs), particularly Reed–Solomon error correction. These techniques store extra bits, determined by mathematical formulas, for each block of data; the extra bits allow many errors to be corrected invisibly. The extra bits themselves take up space on the HDD, but allow higher recording densities to be employed without causing uncorrectable errors, resulting in much larger storage capacity.[66] For example, a typical 1 TB hard disk with 512-byte sectors provides additional capacity of about 93 GB for the ECC data.[67]

In the newest drives, as of 2009,[68] low-density parity-check codes (LDPC) were supplanting Reed–Solomon; LDPC codes enable performance close to the Shannon Limit and thus provide the highest storage density available.[68][69]

Typical hard disk drives attempt to "remap" the data in a physical sector that is failing to a spare physical sector provided by the drive's "spare sector pool" (also called "reserve pool"),[70] while relying on the ECC to recover stored data while the number of errors in a bad sector is still low enough. The S.M.A.R.T (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) feature counts the total number of errors in the entire HDD fixed by ECC (although not on all hard drives as the related S.M.A.R.T attributes "Hardware ECC Recovered" and "Soft ECC Correction" are not consistently supported), and the total number of performed sector remappings, as the occurrence of many such errors may predict an HDD failure.

The "No-ID Format", developed by IBM in the mid-1990s, contains information about which sectors are bad and where remapped sectors have been located.[71]

Only a tiny fraction of the detected errors end up as not correctable. Examples of specified uncorrected bit read error rates include:

  • 2013 specifications for enterprise SAS disk drives state the error rate to be one uncorrected bit read error in every 1016 bits read,[72][73]
  • 2018 specifications for consumer SATA hard drives state the error rate to be one uncorrected bit read error in every 1014 bits.[74][75]

Within a given manufacturers model the uncorrected bit error rate is typically the same regardless of capacity of the drive.[72][73][74][75]

The worst type of errors are silent data corruptions which are errors undetected by the disk firmware or the host operating system; some of these errors may be caused by hard disk drive malfunctions while others originate elsewhere in the connection between the drive and the host.[76]

Development
Leading-edge hard disk drive areal densities from 1956 through 2009 compared to Moore's law. By 2016, progress had slowed significantly below the extrapolated density trend.[77]

The rate of areal density advancement was similar to Moore's law (doubling every two years) through 2010: 60% per year during 1988–1996, 100% during 1996–2003 and 30% during 2003–2010.[78] Speaking in 1997, Gordon Moore called the increase "flabbergasting",[79] while observing later that growth cannot continue forever.[80] Price improvement decelerated to −12% per year during 2010–2017,[81] as the growth of areal density slowed. The rate of advancement for areal density slowed to 10% per year during 2010–2016,[82] and there was difficulty in migrating from perpendicular recording to newer technologies.[83]

As bit cell size decreases, more data can be put onto a single drive platter. In 2013, a production desktop 3 TB HDD (with four platters) would have had an areal density of about 500 Gbit/in2 which would have amounted to a bit cell comprising about 18 magnetic grains (11 by 1.6 grains).[84] Since the mid-2000s areal density progress has been challenged by a superparamagnetic trilemma involving grain size, grain magnetic strength and ability of the head to write.[85] In order to maintain acceptable signal to noise smaller grains are required; smaller grains may self-reverse (electrothermal instability) unless their magnetic strength is increased, but known write head materials are unable to generate a strong enough magnetic field sufficient to write the medium in the increasingly smaller space taken by grains.

Magnetic storage technologies are being developed to address this trilemma, and compete with flash memory–based solid-state drives (SSDs). In 2013, Seagate introduced shingled magnetic recording (SMR),[86] intended as something of a "stopgap" technology between PMR and Seagate's intended successor heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), SMR utilises overlapping tracks for increased data density, at the cost of design complexity and lower data access speeds (particularly write speeds and random access 4k speeds).[87][88] By contrast, Western Digital focused on developing ways to seal helium-filled drives instead of the usual filtered air. This reduces turbulence and friction, and fits more platters into the same enclosure space, though helium gas is notoriously difficult to prevent escaping.

Other recording technologies are under development as of 2019, including Seagate's heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR). HAMR requires a different architecture with redesigned media and read/write heads, new lasers, and new near-field optical transducers.[89] HAMR is expected to ship commercially in late 2020 or 2021.[90][91] Technical issues delayed the introduction of HAMR by a decade, from earlier projections of 2009,[92] 2015,[93] 2016,[94] and the first half of 2019. Some drives have adopted dual independent actuator arms to increase read/write speeds and compete with SSDs.[95] HAMR's planned successor, bit-patterned recording (BPR),[96] has been removed from the roadmaps of Western Digital and Seagate.[97] Western Digital's microwave-assisted magnetic recording (MAMR),[98][99] is expected to be shipped commercially in 2021, with sampling in 2020.[100] Two-dimensional magnetic recording (TDMR)[84][101] and "current perpendicular to plane" giant magnetoresistance (CPP/GMR) heads have appeared in research papers.[102][103][104] A 3D-actuated vacuum drive (3DHD) concept has been proposed.[105]

The rate of areal density growth has dropped below the historical Moore's law rate of 40% per year.[77] Depending upon assumptions on feasibility and timing of these technologies, Seagate forecasts that areal density will grow 20% per year during 2020–2034.[45]

Capacity
Two Seagate Barracuda drives, from 2003 and 2009 - respectively 160GB and 1TB. As of 2020 Seagate offers capacities up to 16TB.

The highest-capacity desktop HDDs had 16 TB in late 2019.[106]

The capacity of a hard disk drive, as reported by an operating system to the end user, is smaller than the amount stated by the manufacturer for several reasons: the operating system using some space, use of some space for data redundancy, and space use for file system structures. Also the difference in capacity reported in SI decimal prefixed units vs. binary prefixes can lead to a false impression of missing capacity.

Calculation

Modern hard disk drives appear to their host controller as a contiguous set of logical blocks, and the gross drive capacity is calculated by multiplying the number of blocks by the block size. This information is available from the manufacturer's product specification, and from the drive itself through use of operating system functions that invoke low-level drive commands.[107][108]

Some older drives, e.g., IBM 1301, CKD, have variable length records and the capacity calculation must take into account the characteristics of the records. Some newer DASD simulate CKD, and the same capacity formulae apply.

The gross capacity of older sector-oriented HDDs is calculated as the product of the number of cylinders per recording zone, the number of bytes per sector (most commonly 512), and the count of zones of the drive. Some modern SATA drives also report cylinder-head-sector (CHS) capacities, but these are not physical parameters because the reported values are constrained by historic operating system interfaces. The C/H/S scheme has been replaced by logical block addressing (LBA), a simple linear addressing scheme that locates blocks by an integer index, which starts at LBA 0 for the first block and increments thereafter.[109] When using the C/H/S method to describe modern large drives, the number of heads is often set to 64, although a typical hard disk drive, as of 2013, has between one and four platters.

In modern HDDs, spare capacity for defect management is not included in the published capacity; however, in many early HDDs a certain number of sectors were reserved as spares, thereby reducing the capacity available to the operating system.

For RAID subsystems, data integrity and fault-tolerance requirements also reduce the realized capacity. For example, a RAID 1 array has about half the total capacity as a result of data mirroring, while a RAID 5 array with n drives loses 1/n of capacity (which equals to the capacity of a single drive) due to storing parity information. RAID subsystems are multiple drives that appear to be one drive or more drives to the user, but provide fault tolerance. Most RAID vendors use checksums to improve data integrity at the block level. Some vendors design systems using HDDs with sectors of 520 bytes to contain 512 bytes of user data and eight checksum bytes, or by using separate 512-byte sectors for the checksum data.[110]

Some systems may use hidden partitions for system recovery, reducing the capacity available to the end user.

Formatting
Main article: Disk formatting

Data is stored on a hard drive in a series of logical blocks. Each block is delimited by markers identifying its start and end, error detecting and correcting information, and space between blocks to allow for minor timing variations. These blocks often contained 512 bytes of usable data, but other sizes have been used. As drive density increased, an initiative known as Advanced Format extended the block size to 4096 bytes of usable data, with a resulting significant reduction in the amount of disk space used for block headers, error checking data, and spacing.

The process of initializing these logical blocks on the physical disk platters is called low-level formatting, which is usually performed at the factory and is not normally changed in the field.[111] High-level formatting writes data structures used by the operating system to organize data files on the disk. This includes writing partition and file system structures into selected logical blocks. For example, some of the disk space will be used to hold a directory of disk file names and a list of logical blocks associated with a particular file.

Examples of partition mapping scheme include Master boot record (MBR) and GUID Partition Table (GPT). Examples of data structures stored on disk to retrieve files include the File Allocation Table (FAT) in the DOS file system and inodes in many UNIX file systems, as well as other operating system data structures (also known as metadata). As a consequence, not all the space on an HDD is available for user files, but this system overhead is usually small compared with user data.

Units
See also: Binary prefix § disk drives
Decimal and binary unit prefixes interpretation[112][113]
Capacity advertised by manufacturers[lower-alpha 8] Capacity expected by some consumers[lower-alpha 9] Reported capacity
Windows[lower-alpha 9] macOS ver 10.6+[lower-alpha 8]
With prefix Bytes Bytes Diff.
100 GB 100,000,000,000 107,374,182,400 7.37% 93.1 GB 100 GB
1 TB 1,000,000,000,000 1,099,511,627,776 9.95% 931 GB 1,000 GB, 1,000,000 MB

The total capacity of HDDs is given by manufacturers using SI decimal prefixes such as gigabytes (1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes) and terabytes (1 TB = 1,000,000,000,000 bytes).[112] This practice dates back to the early days of computing;[114] by the 1970s, "million", "mega" and "M" were consistently used in the decimal sense for drive capacity.[115][116][117] However, capacities of memory are quoted using a binary interpretation of the prefixes, i.e. using powers of 1024 instead of 1000.

Software reports hard disk drive or memory capacity in different forms using either decimal or binary prefixes. The Microsoft Windows family of operating systems uses the binary convention when reporting storage capacity, so an HDD offered by its manufacturer as a 1 TB drive is reported by these operating systems as a 931 GB HDD. Mac OS X 10.6 ("Snow Leopard") uses decimal convention when reporting HDD capacity.[118] The default behavior of the df command-line utility on Linux is to report the HDD capacity as a number of 1024-byte units.[119]

The difference between the decimal and binary prefix interpretation caused some consumer confusion and led to class action suits against HDD manufacturers. The plaintiffs argued that the use of decimal prefixes effectively misled consumers while the defendants denied any wrongdoing or liability, asserting that their marketing and advertising complied in all respects with the law and that no class member sustained any damages or injuries.[120][121][122]

Price evolution

HDD price per byte improved at the rate of −40% per year during 1988–1996, −51% per year during 1996–2003 and −34% per year during 2003–2010.[27][78] The price improvement decelerated to −13% per year during 2011–2014, as areal density increase slowed and the 2011 Thailand floods damaged manufacturing facilities[83] and have held at -11% per year during 2010–2017.[123]

The Federal Reserve Board has published a quality-adjusted price index for large-scale enterprise storage systems including three or more enterprise HDDs and associated controllers, racks and cables. Prices for these large-scale storage systems improved at the rate of ‒30% per year during 2004–2009 and ‒22% per year during 2009–2014.[78]

Form factors
Main article: List of disk drive form factors
8-, 5.25-, 3.5-, 2.5-, 1.8- and 1-inch HDDs, together with a ruler to show the size of platters and read-write heads
A newer 2.5-inch (63.5 mm) 6,495 MB HDD compared to an older 5.25-inch full-height 110 MB HDD

IBM's first hard disk drive, the IBM 350, used a stack of fifty 24-inch platters, stored 3.75 MB of data (approximately the size of one modern digital picture), and was of a size comparable to two large refrigerators. In 1962, IBM introduced its model 1311 disk, which used six 14-inch (nominal size) platters in a removable pack and was roughly the size of a washing machine. This became a standard platter size for many years, used also by other manufacturers.[124] The IBM 2314 used platters of the same size in an eleven-high pack and introduced the "drive in a drawer" layout. sometimes called the"pizza oven", although the "drawer" was not the complete drive. Into the 1970s HDDs were offered in standalone cabinets of varying dimensions containing from one to four HDDs.

Beginning in the late 1960s drives were offered that fit entirely into a chassis that would mount in a 19-inch rack. Digital's RK05 and RL01 were early examples using single 14-inch platters in removable packs, the entire drive fitting in a 10.5-inch-high rack space (six rack units). In the mid-to-late 1980s the similarly sized Fujitsu Eagle, which used (coincidentally) 10.5-inch platters, was a popular product.

With increasing sales of microcomputers having built in floppy-disk drives (FDDs), HDDs that would fit to the FDD mountings became desirable. Starting with the Shugart Associates SA1000, HDD form factors initially followed those of 8-inch, 5½-inch, and 3½-inch floppy disk drives. Although referred to by these nominal sizes, the actual sizes for those three drives respectively are 9.5", 5.75" and 4" wide. Because there were no smaller floppy disk drives, smaller HDD form factors such as 2½-inch drives (actually 2.75" wide) developed from product offerings or industry standards.

As of 2019, 2½-inch and 3½-inch hard disks are the most popular sizes. By 2009, all manufacturers had discontinued the development of new products for the 1.3-inch, 1-inch and 0.85-inch form factors due to falling prices of flash memory,[125][126] which has no moving parts. While nominal sizes are in inches, actual dimensions are specified in millimeters.

Performance characteristics
Main article: Hard disk drive performance characteristics

The factors that limit the time to access the data on an HDD are mostly related to the mechanical nature of the rotating disks and moving heads, including:

  • Seek time is a measure of how long it takes the head assembly to travel to the track of the disk that contains data.
  • Rotational latency is incurred because the desired disk sector may not be directly under the head when data transfer is requested. Average rotational latency is shown in the table, based on the statistical relation that the average latency is one-half the rotational period.
  • The bit rate or data transfer rate (once the head is in the right position) creates delay which is a function of the number of blocks transferred; typically relatively small, but can be quite long with the transfer of large contiguous files.

Delay may also occur if the drive disks are stopped to save energy.

Defragmentation is a procedure used to minimize delay in retrieving data by moving related items to physically proximate areas on the disk.[127] Some computer operating systems perform defragmentation automatically. Although automatic defragmentation is intended to reduce access delays, performance will be temporarily reduced while the procedure is in progress.[128]

Time to access data can be improved by increasing rotational speed (thus reducing latency) or by reducing the time spent seeking. Increasing areal density increases throughput by increasing data rate and by increasing the amount of data under a set of heads, thereby potentially reducing seek activity for a given amount of data. The time to access data has not kept up with throughput increases, which themselves have not kept up with growth in bit density and storage capacity.

Latency
Rotational speed
[rpm]		 Average rotational latency
[ms]
15,000 2
10,000 3
7,200 4.16
5,400 5.55
4,800 6.25

Data transfer rate

As of 2010, a typical 7,200-rpm desktop HDD has a sustained "disk-to-buffer" data transfer rate up to 1,030 Mbit/s.[129] This rate depends on the track location; the rate is higher for data on the outer tracks (where there are more data sectors per rotation) and lower toward the inner tracks (where there are fewer data sectors per rotation); and is generally somewhat higher for 10,000-rpm drives. A current widely used standard for the "buffer-to-computer" interface is 3.0 Gbit/s SATA, which can send about 300 megabyte/s (10-bit encoding) from the buffer to the computer, and thus is still comfortably ahead of today's disk-to-buffer transfer rates. Data transfer rate (read/write) can be measured by writing a large file to disk using special file generator tools, then reading back the file. Transfer rate can be influenced by file system fragmentation and the layout of the files.[127]

HDD data transfer rate depends upon the rotational speed of the platters and the data recording density. Because heat and vibration limit rotational speed, advancing density becomes the main method to improve sequential transfer rates. Higher speeds require a more powerful spindle motor, which creates more heat. While areal density advances by increasing both the number of tracks across the disk and the number of sectors per track,[130] only the latter increases the data transfer rate for a given rpm. Since data transfer rate performance tracks only one of the two components of areal density, its performance improves at a lower rate.[131]

Other considerations

Other performance considerations include quality-adjusted price, power consumption, audible noise, and both operating and non-operating shock resistance.

Access and interfaces
Main article: hard disk drive interface
Inner view of a 1998 Seagate HDD that used the Parallel ATA interface
2.5-inch SATA drive on top of 3.5-inch SATA drive, showing close-up of (7-pin) data and (15-pin) power connectors

Current hard drives connect to a computer over one of several bus types, including parallel ATA, Serial ATA, SCSI, Serial Attached SCSI (SAS), and Fibre Channel. Some drives, especially external portable drives, use IEEE 1394, or USB. All of these interfaces are digital; electronics on the drive process the analog signals from the read/write heads. Current drives present a consistent interface to the rest of the computer, independent of the data encoding scheme used internally, and independent of the physical number of disks and heads within the drive.

Typically a DSP in the electronics inside the drive takes the raw analog voltages from the read head and uses PRML and Reed–Solomon error correction[132] to decode the data, then sends that data out the standard interface. That DSP also watches the error rate detected by error detection and correction, and performs bad sector remapping, data collection for Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology, and other internal tasks.

Modern interfaces connect the drive to the host interface with a single data/control cable. Each drive also has an additional power cable, usually direct to the power supply unit. Older interfaces had separate cables for data signals and for drive control signals.

  • Small Computer System Interface (SCSI), originally named SASI for Shugart Associates System Interface, was standard on servers, workstations, Commodore Amiga, Atari ST and Apple Macintosh computers through the mid-1990s, by which time most models had been transitioned to newer interfaces. The length limit of the data cable allows for external SCSI devices.
  • Integrated Drive Electronics (IDE), later standardized under the name AT Attachment (ATA, with the alias PATA (Parallel ATA) retroactively added upon introduction of SATA) moved the HDD controller from the interface card to the disk drive. This helped to standardize the host/controller interface, reduce the programming complexity in the host device driver, and reduced system cost and complexity. The 40-pin IDE/ATA connection transfers 16 bits of data at a time on the data cable. The data cable was originally 40-conductor, but later higher speed requirements led to an "ultra DMA" (UDMA) mode using an 80-conductor cable with additional wires to reduce crosstalk at high speed.
  • EIDE was an unofficial update (by Western Digital) to the original IDE standard, with the key improvement being the use of direct memory access (DMA) to transfer data between the disk and the computer without the involvement of the CPU, an improvement later adopted by the official ATA standards. By directly transferring data between memory and disk, DMA eliminates the need for the CPU to copy byte per byte, therefore allowing it to process other tasks while the data transfer occurs.
  • Fibre Channel (FC) is a successor to parallel SCSI interface on enterprise market. It is a serial protocol. In disk drives usually the Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop (FC-AL) connection topology is used. FC has much broader usage than mere disk interfaces, and it is the cornerstone of storage area networks (SANs). Recently other protocols for this field, like iSCSI and ATA over Ethernet have been developed as well. Confusingly, drives usually use copper twisted-pair cables for Fibre Channel, not fibre optics. The latter are traditionally reserved for larger devices, such as servers or disk array controllers.
  • Serial Attached SCSI (SAS). The SAS is a new generation serial communication protocol for devices designed to allow for much higher speed data transfers and is compatible with SATA. SAS uses a mechanically identical data and power connector to standard 3.5-inch SATA1/SATA2 HDDs, and many server-oriented SAS RAID controllers are also capable of addressing SATA HDDs. SAS uses serial communication instead of the parallel method found in traditional SCSI devices but still uses SCSI commands.
  • Serial ATA (SATA). The SATA data cable has one data pair for differential transmission of data to the device, and one pair for differential receiving from the device, just like EIA-422. That requires that data be transmitted serially. A similar differential signaling system is used in RS485, LocalTalk, USB, FireWire, and differential SCSI. SATA I to III are designed to be compatible with, and use, a subset of SAS commands, and compatible interfaces. Therefore, a SATA hard drive can be connected to and controlled by a SAS hard drive controller (with some minor exceptions such as drives/controllers with limited compatibility). However they cannot be connected the other way round—a SATA controller cannot be connected to a SAS drive.

Integrity and failure
Close-up of an HDD head resting on a disk platter; its mirror reflection is visible on the platter surface.
Main articles: Hard disk drive failure, Head crash, and Data recovery
See also: Solid-state drive § SSD reliability and failure modes

Due to the extremely close spacing between the heads and the disk surface, HDDs are vulnerable to being damaged by a head crash – a failure of the disk in which the head scrapes across the platter surface, often grinding away the thin magnetic film and causing data loss. Head crashes can be caused by electronic failure, a sudden power failure, physical shock, contamination of the drive's internal enclosure, wear and tear, corrosion, or poorly manufactured platters and heads.

The HDD's spindle system relies on air density inside the disk enclosure to support the heads at their proper flying height while the disk rotates. HDDs require a certain range of air densities to operate properly. The connection to the external environment and density occurs through a small hole in the enclosure (about 0.5 mm in breadth), usually with a filter on the inside (the breather filter).[133] If the air density is too low, then there is not enough lift for the flying head, so the head gets too close to the disk, and there is a risk of head crashes and data loss. Specially manufactured sealed and pressurized disks are needed for reliable high-altitude operation, above about 3,000 m (9,800 ft).[134] Modern disks include temperature sensors and adjust their operation to the operating environment. Breather holes can be seen on all disk drives – they usually have a sticker next to them, warning the user not to cover the holes. The air inside the operating drive is constantly moving too, being swept in motion by friction with the spinning platters. This air passes through an internal recirculation (or "recirc") filter to remove any leftover contaminants from manufacture, any particles or chemicals that may have somehow entered the enclosure, and any particles or outgassing generated internally in normal operation. Very high humidity present for extended periods of time can corrode the heads and platters.

For giant magnetoresistive (GMR) heads in particular, a minor head crash from contamination (that does not remove the magnetic surface of the disk) still results in the head temporarily overheating, due to friction with the disk surface, and can render the data unreadable for a short period until the head temperature stabilizes (so called "thermal asperity", a problem which can partially be dealt with by proper electronic filtering of the read signal).

When the logic board of a hard disk fails, the drive can often be restored to functioning order and the data recovered by replacing the circuit board with one of an identical hard disk. In the case of read-write head faults, they can be replaced using specialized tools in a dust-free environment. If the disk platters are undamaged, they can be transferred into an identical enclosure and the data can be copied or cloned onto a new drive. In the event of disk-platter failures, disassembly and imaging of the disk platters may be required.[135] For logical damage to file systems, a variety of tools, including fsck on UNIX-like systems and CHKDSK on Windows, can be used for data recovery. Recovery from logical damage can require file carving.

A common expectation is that hard disk drives designed and marketed for server use will fail less frequently than consumer-grade drives usually used in desktop computers. However, two independent studies by Carnegie Mellon University[136] and Google[137] found that the "grade" of a drive does not relate to the drive's failure rate.

A 2011 summary of research, into SSD and magnetic disk failure patterns by Tom's Hardware summarized research findings as follows:[138]

  • Mean time between failures (MTBF) does not indicate reliability; the annualized failure rate is higher and usually more relevant.
  • As of 2019, a storage provider reported an annualized failure rate of two percent per year for a storage farm with 110,000 off-the-shelf HDDs. The reliability varies between models and manufacturers.[139]
  • Magnetic disks do not tend to fail during early use, and temperature has only a minor effect; instead, failure rates steadily increase with age.
  • S.M.A.R.T. warns of mechanical issues but not other issues affecting reliability, and is therefore not a reliable indicator of condition.[140]
  • Failure rates of drives sold as "enterprise" and "consumer" are "very much similar", although these drive types are customized for their different operating environments.[141][142]
  • In drive arrays, one drive's failure significantly increases the short-term risk of a second drive failing.

To minimize cost and overcome failures of individual HDDs, storage systems providers rely on redundant HDD arrays. HDDs that fail are replaced on an ongoing basis.[139][92]

Market segments
Desktop HDDs
They typically store between 60 GB and 8 TB and rotate at 5,400 to 10,000 rpm, and have a media transfer rate of 0.5 Gbit/s or higher (1 GB = 109 bytes; 1 Gbit/s = 109 bit/s). Earlier (1980-1990s) drives tend to be slower in rotation speed. As of May 2019, the highest-capacity desktop HDDs stored 16 TB,[143][144] with plans to release 18 TB drives later in 2019.[145] 18 TB HDDs were released in 2020. As of 2016, the typical speed of a hard drive in an average desktop computer is 7200 RPM, whereas low-cost desktop computers may use 5900 RPM or 5400 RPM drives. For some time in the 2000s and early 2010s some desktop users and data centers also used 10k RPM drives such as Western Digital Raptor but such drives have become much rarer as of 2016 and are not commonly used now, having been replaced by NAND flash-based SSDs.
Mobile (laptop) HDDs
Two enterprise-grade SATA 2.5-inch 10,000 rpm HDDs, factory-mounted in 3.5-inch adapter frames
Smaller than their desktop and enterprise counterparts, they tend to be slower and have lower capacity. Mobile HDDs spin at 4,200 rpm, 5,200 rpm, 5,400 rpm, or 7,200 rpm, with 5,400 rpm being the most common. 7,200 rpm drives tend to be more expensive and have smaller capacities, while 4,200 rpm models usually have very high storage capacities. Because of smaller platter(s), mobile HDDs generally have lower capacity than their desktop counterparts.
There are also 2.5-inch drives spinning at 10,000 rpm, which belong to the enterprise segment with no intention to be used in laptops.
Enterprise HDDs
Typically used with multiple-user computers running enterprise software. Examples are: transaction processing databases, internet infrastructure (email, webserver, e-commerce), scientific computing software, and nearline storage management software. Enterprise drives commonly operate continuously ("24/7") in demanding environments while delivering the highest possible performance without sacrificing reliability. Maximum capacity is not the primary goal, and as a result the drives are often offered in capacities that are relatively low in relation to their cost.[146]
The fastest enterprise HDDs spin at 10,000 or 15,000 rpm, and can achieve sequential media transfer speeds above 1.6 Gbit/s[147] and a sustained transfer rate up to 1 Gbit/s.[147] Drives running at 10,000 or 15,000 rpm use smaller platters to mitigate increased power requirements (as they have less air drag) and therefore generally have lower capacity than the highest capacity desktop drives. Enterprise HDDs are commonly connected through Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) or Fibre Channel (FC). Some support multiple ports, so they can be connected to a redundant host bus adapter.
Enterprise HDDs can have sector sizes larger than 512 bytes (often 520, 524, 528 or 536 bytes). The additional per-sector space can be used by hardware RAID controllers or applications for storing Data Integrity Field (DIF) or Data Integrity Extensions (DIX) data, resulting in higher reliability and prevention of silent data corruption.[148]
Consumer electronics HDDs
They include drives embedded into digital video recorders and automotive vehicles. The former are configured to provide a guaranteed streaming capacity, even in the face of read and write errors, while the latter are built to resist larger amounts of shock. They usually spin at a speed of 5400 RPM.

Manufacturers and sales
Diagram of HDD manufacturer consolidation
See also: History of hard disk drives and List of defunct hard disk manufacturers

More than 200 companies have manufactured HDDs over time, but consolidations have concentrated production to just three manufacturers today: Western Digital, Seagate, and Toshiba. Production is mainly in the Pacific rim.

Worldwide revenue for disk storage declined eight percent per year, from a peak of $38 billion in 2012 to $22 billion (estimated) in 2019.[45] Production of HDD storage grew 15% per year during 2011–2017, from 335 to 780 exabytes per year.[149] HDD shipments declined seven percent per year during this time period, from 620 to 406 million units.[149][82] HDD shipments were projected to drop by 18% during 2018–2019, from 375 million to 309 million units.[150] In 2018, Seagate has 40% of unit shipments, Western Digital has 37% of unit shipments, while Toshiba has 23% of unit shipments.[151] The average sales price for the two largest manufacturers was $60 per unit in 2015.[152]

Competition from SSDs

HDDs are being superseded by solid-state drives (SSDs) in markets where their higher speed (up to 4950 megabytes per second for M.2 (NGFF) NVMe SSDs,[153] or 2500 megabytes per second for PCIe expansion card drives[154]), ruggedness, and lower power are more important than price, since the bit cost of SSDs is four to nine times higher than HDDs.[16][15] As of 2016, HDDs are reported to have a failure rate of 2–9% per year, while SSDs have fewer failures: 1–3% per year.[155] However, SSDs have more un-correctable data errors than HDDs.[155]

SSDs offer larger capacities (up to 100 TB[43]) than the largest HDD and/or higher storage densities (100 TB and 30 TB SSDs are housed in 2.5 inch HDD cases but with the same height as a 3.5-inch HDD[156][157][158][159][160]), although their cost remains prohibitive.

A laboratory demonstration of a 1.33-Tb 3D NAND chip with 96 layers (NAND commonly used in solid state drives (SSDs)) had 5.5 Tbit/in2 as of 2019,[161] while the maximum areal density for HDDs is 1.5 Tbit/in2. The areal density of flash memory is doubling every two years, similar to Moore's law (40% per year) and faster than the 10–20% per year for HDDs. As of 2018, the maximum capacity was 16 terabytes for an HDD,[162] and 100 terabytes for an SSD.[30] HDDs were used in 70% of the desktop and notebook computers produced in 2016, and SSDs were used in 30%. The usage share of HDDs is declining and could drop below 50% in 2018–2019 according to one forecast, because SSDs are replacing smaller-capacity (less than one-terabyte) HDDs in desktop and notebook computers and MP3 players.[163]

The market for silicon-based flash memory (NAND) chips, used in SSDs and other applications, is growing faster than for HDDs. Worldwide NAND revenue grew 16% per year from $22 billion to $57 billion during 2011–2017, while production grew 45% per year from 19 exabytes to 175 exabytes.[149]

External hard disk drives
See also: USB mass storage device class and Disk enclosure
Two 2.5" external USB hard drives

External hard disk drives typically connect via USB; variants using USB 2.0 interface generally have slower data transfer rates when compared to internally mounted hard drives connected through SATA. Plug and play drive functionality offers system compatibility and features large storage options and portable design. As of March 2015, available capacities for external hard disk drives ranged from 500 GB to 10 TB.[164]

External hard disk drives are usually available as assembled integrated products but may be also assembled by combining an external enclosure (with USB or other interface) with a separately purchased drive. They are available in 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch sizes; 2.5-inch variants are typically called portable external drives, while 3.5-inch variants are referred to as desktop external drives. "Portable" drives are packaged in smaller and lighter enclosures than the "desktop" drives; additionally, "portable" drives use power provided by the USB connection, while "desktop" drives require external power bricks.

Features such as encryption, Wi-Fi connectivity,[165] biometric security or multiple interfaces (for example, FireWire) are available at a higher cost.[166] There are pre-assembled external hard disk drives that, when taken out from their enclosures, cannot be used internally in a laptop or desktop computer due to embedded USB interface on their printed circuit boards, and lack of SATA (or Parallel ATA) interfaces.[167][168]

  • In GUIs, hard disk drives are commonly symbolized with a drive icon

See also

Notes
  1. This is the original filing date of the application which led to US Patent 3,503,060, generally accepted as the definitive hard disk drive patent.[1]
  2. Further inequivalent terms used to describe various hard disk drives include disk drive, disk file, direct access storage device (DASD), CKD disk, and Winchester disk drive (after the IBM 3340). The term "DASD" includes other devices beside disks.
  3. Comparable in size to a large side-by-side refrigerator.
  4. The 1.8-inch form factor is obsolete; sizes smaller than 2.5 inches have been replaced by flash memory.
  5. 40 for user data, one for format tracks, 6 for alternate surfaces and one for maintenance.
  6. Initially gamma iron oxide particles in an epoxy binder, the recording layer in a modern HDD typically is domains of a granular Cobalt-Chrome-Platinum-based alloy physically isolated by an oxide to enable perpendicular recording.[51]
  7. Historically a variety of run-length limited codes have been used in magnetic recording including for example, codes named FM, MFM and GCR which are no longer used in modern HDDs.
  8. Expressed using decimal multiples.
  9. Expressed using binary multiples.

References
  1. Kean, David W., "IBM San Jose, A quarter century of innovation", 1977.
  2. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H.; Arpaci-Dusseau, Andrea C. (2014). "Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces, Chapter: Hard Disk Drives" (PDF). Arpaci-Dusseau Books. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2014.
  3. Patterson, David; Hennessy, John (1971). Computer Organization and Design: The Hardware/Software Interface. Elsevier. p. 23. ISBN 9780080502571.
  4. Domingo, Joel. "SSD vs. HDD: What's the Difference?". PC Magazine UK. Archived from the original on March 28, 2018. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  5. Mustafa, Naveed Ul; Armejach, Adria; Ozturk, Ozcan; Cristal, Adrian; Unsal, Osman S. (2016). "Implications of non-volatile memory as primary storage for database management systems". 2016 International Conference on Embedded Computer Systems: Architectures, Modeling and Simulation (SAMOS). IEEE. pp. 164–171. doi:10.1109/SAMOS.2016.7818344. hdl:11693/37609. ISBN 978-1-5090-3076-7. S2CID 17794134.
  6. "IBM Archives: IBM 350 disk storage unit". January 23, 2003. Archived from the original on May 31, 2008. Retrieved October 19, 2012.
  7. Shilov, Anton. "Demand for HDD Storage Booming: 240 EB Shipped in Q3 2019". www.anandtech.com.
  8. "Validating the Reliability of Intel Solid-State Drives" (PDF). Intel. July 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 19, 2016. Retrieved February 10, 2012.
  9. Fullerton, Eric (March 2018). "5th Non-Volatile Memories Workshop (NVMW 2018)" (PDF). IEEE. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 28, 2018. Retrieved April 23, 2018.
  10. Handy, James (July 31, 2012). "For the Lack of a Fab..." Objective Analysis. Archived from the original on January 1, 2013. Retrieved November 25, 2012.
  11. Hutchinson, Lee. (June 25, 2012) How SSDs conquered mobile devices and modern OSes Archived July 7, 2017, at the Wayback Machine. Ars Technica. Retrieved January 7, 2013.
  12. Santo Domingo, Joel (May 10, 2012). "SSD vs HDD: What's the Difference?". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on March 19, 2017. Retrieved November 24, 2012.
  13. Hough, Jack (May 14, 2018). "Why Western Digital Can Gain 45% Despite Declining HDD Business". Barron’s. Archived from the original on May 15, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2018.
  14. Mellor, Chris (July 31, 2017). "NAND that's that... Flash chip industry worth twice disk drive biz". Retrieved November 21, 2019.
  15. McCallum, John C. (November 2019). "Disk Drive Storage Price Decreasing with Time (1955-2019)". jcmit.com. Retrieved November 25, 2019.
  16. Mellor, Chris (August 28, 2019). "How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives?". Retrieved November 15, 2019.
  17. "Time Capsule, 1956 Hard Disk". Oracle Magazine. Oracle. July 2014. Archived from the original on August 11, 2014. Retrieved September 19, 2014. IBM 350 disk drive held 3.75 MB
  18. "WD GOLD hard drives with 18 Terabyte Storage Volume start listing for 649 bucks". guru3D. Archived from the original on July 18, 2020. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  19. 16,000,000,000,000 divided by 3,750,000
  20. "Toshiba Storage Solutions – MK3233GSG". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved November 7, 2009.
  21. 68 x 12 x 12 x 12 divided by 2.1
  22. 910,000 divided by 62
  23. 600 divided by 2.5
  24. Ballistic Research Laboratories "A THIRD SURVEY OF DOMESTIC ELECTRONIC DIGITAL COMPUTING SYSTEMS," March 1961, section on IBM 305 RAMAC Archived March 2, 2015, at the Wayback Machine (p. 314-331) states a $34,500 purchase price which calculates to $9,200/MB.
  25. Athow, Desire (May 2020). "The largest available hard disk is still a 16TB drive". techradar.com.
  26. $387.55÷16,000 GB.
  27. McCallum, John C. (May 16, 2015). "Disk Drive Prices (1955–2015)". jcmit.com. Archived from the original on July 14, 2015. Retrieved July 25, 2015.
  28. 9,200,000 divided by 0.024.
  29. "Magnetic head development". IBM Archives. Archived from the original on March 21, 2015. Retrieved August 11, 2014.
  30. Shilov, Anton (March 19, 2018). "Unlimited 5 Year Endurance: The 100TB SSD from Nimbus Data". AnandTech. Archived from the original on December 24, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2018.
  31. 1,300,000,000,000 divided by 2,000.
  32. "Ultrastar DC HC500 Series HDD". Hgst.com. Archived from the original on August 29, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  33. 2,500,000 divided by 2,000.
  34. "IBM Archives: IBM 350 disk storage unit". IBM. January 23, 2003. Archived from the original on June 17, 2015. Retrieved July 26, 2015.
  35. "355 DISK STORAGE", IBM 650 RAMAC Manual of Operations (4th ed.), June 1, 1957, p. 17, 22-6270-3, Three mechanically independent access arms are provided for each file unit, and each arm can be independently directed to any track in the file.
  36. "Disk Storage" (PDF), IBM Reference Manual 7070 Data Processing System (2nd ed.), January 1960, A22-7003-1, Each disk-storage unit has three mechanically independent access arms, all of which can be seeking at the same time.
  37. "IBM RAMAC 1401 System" (PDF), Reference Manual IBM 1401 Data Processing System (6th ed.), April 1962, p. 63, A24-1403-5, The disk storage unit can have two access arms. One is standard and the other is available as a special feature.
  38. "IBM Archives: IBM 1301 disk storage unit". ibm.com. January 23, 2003. Archived from the original on December 19, 2014. Retrieved June 25, 2015.
  39. "DiskPlatter-1301". computermuseum.li. Archived from the original on March 28, 2015.
  40. IBM 1301, Models 1 and 2, Disk Storage and IBM 1302, Models 1 and 2, Disk Storage with IBM 7090, 7094 and 7094 II Data Processing Systems (PDF). IBM. A22-6785.
  41. Microsoft Windows NT Workstation 4.0 Resource Guide 1995, Chapter 17 – Disk and File System Basics
  42. Chaudhuri, P. Pal (April 15, 2008). Computer Organization and Design (3rd ed.). PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 568. ISBN 978-81-203-3511-0.
  43. Alcorn, Paul (March 19, 2018). "Need A 100TB SSD? Nimbus Data Has You Covered With The ExaDrive DC100". Tomshardware.com. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  44. Mott, Nathaniel (November 7, 2018). "Seagate Wants to Ship 100TB HDDs by 2025". Tomshardware.com. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  45. Mellor, Chris (September 23, 2019). "How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives?". Retrieved November 15, 2019. the total addressable market for disk drives will grow from $21.8bn in 2019
  46. Kanellos, Michael (January 17, 2006). "Flash goes the notebook". CNET. Archived from the original on May 19, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2018.
  47. "Industry Life Cycle - Encyclopedia - Business Terms". Inc. Archived from the original on July 8, 2018. Retrieved May 15, 2018.
  48. "Farming hard drives: how Backblaze weathered the Thailand drive crisis". blaze.com. 2013. Archived from the original on June 25, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2014.
  49. https://www.theregister.com/2018/07/17/western_digital_petaling_jaya_malaysia/
  50. https://www.extremetech.com/computing/273849-western-digital-to-close-hdd-plant-increase-ssd-production
  51. Plumer, M. L.; van Ek, J.; Cain, W. C. (2012). "New Paradigms in Magnetic Recording". arXiv:1201.5543 [physics.pop-ph].
  52. "Hard Drives". escotal.com. Archived from the original on September 3, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
  53. "What is a "head-crash" & how can it result in permanent loss of my hard drive data?". data-master.com. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
  54. "Hard Drive Help". hardrivehelp.com. Archived from the original on September 3, 2011. Retrieved July 16, 2011.
  55. Elert, Glenn. "Thickness of a Piece of Paper". hypertextbook.com. Archived from the original on June 8, 2017. Retrieved July 9, 2011.
  56. CMOS-MagView Archived January 13, 2012, at the Wayback Machine is an instrument that visualizes magnetic field structures and strengths.
  57. Blount, Walker C. (November 2007). "Why 7,200 RPM Mobile Hard Disk Drives?" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on April 19, 2012. Retrieved July 17, 2011.
  58. Kozierok, Charles (October 20, 2018). "Hard Drive Spindle Speed". The PC Guide. Archived from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  59. Hayes, Brian. "Terabyte Territory". American Scientist. p. 212. Archived from the original on July 8, 2014. Retrieved September 20, 2014.
  60. "Press Releases December 14, 2004". Toshiba. Archived from the original on April 14, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
  61. "Seagate Momentus 2½" HDDs per webpage January 2008". Seagate.com. October 24, 2008. Archived from the original on March 11, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
  62. "Seagate Barracuda 3½" HDDs per webpage January 2008". Seagate.com. Archived from the original on March 14, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
  63. "Western Digital Scorpio 2½" and Greenpower 3½" HDDs per quarterly conference, July 2007". Wdc.com. Archived from the original on March 16, 2009. Retrieved March 13, 2009.
  64. D. Suess; et al. (2004). "Exchange spring recording media for areal densities up to 10Tbit/in2". J. Magn. Mag. Mat.
  65. R. Victora; et al. (2005). "Composite media for perpendicular magnetic recording". IEEE Trans. Mag. Mat. 41 (2): 537–542. Bibcode:2005ITM....41..537V. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2004.838075. S2CID 29531529.
  66. Kozierok, Charles (November 25, 2018). "Hard Drive Error Correcting Code (ECC)". The PC Guide. Archived from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  67. Stevens, Curtis E. (2011). "Advanced Format in Legacy Infrastructures: More Transparent than Disruptive" (PDF). idema.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 5, 2013. Retrieved November 5, 2013.
  68. "Iterative Detection Read Channel Technology in Hard Disk Drives", Hitachi
  69. "2.5-inch Hard Disk Drive with High Recording Density and High Shock Resistance Archived May 26, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Toshiba, 2011
  70. MjM Data Recovery Ltd. "MJM Data Recovery Ltd: Hard Disk Bad Sector Mapping Techniques". Datarecovery.mjm.co.uk. Archived from the original on February 1, 2014. Retrieved January 21, 2014.
  71. Kozierok, Charles (December 23, 2018). "Hard Drive Sector Format and Structure". The PC Guide. Archived from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  72. "Enterprise Performance 15K HDD: Data Sheet" (PDF). Seagate. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
  73. "WD Xe: Datacenter hard drives" (PDF). Western Digital. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 29, 2013. Retrieved October 24, 2013.
  74. "3.5" BarraCuda data sheet" (PDF). Seagate. June 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 28, 2018. Retrieved July 28, 2018.
  75. "WD Red Desktop/Mobile Series Spec Sheet" (PDF). Western Digital. April 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 28, 2018. Retrieved July 28, 2018.
  76. David S. H. Rosenthal (October 1, 2010). "Keeping Bits Safe: How Hard Can It Be?". ACM Queue. Archived from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved January 2, 2014.
  77. Hayes, Brian (March 27, 2016). "Where's My Petabyte Disk Drive?". p. chart of historical data courtesy of Edward Grochowski. Retrieved December 1, 2019.
  78. Byrne, David (July 1, 2015). "Prices for Data Storage Equipment and the State of IT Innovation". The Federal Reserve Board FEDS Notes. p. Table 2. Archived from the original on July 8, 2015. Retrieved July 5, 2015.
  79. "Gallium Arsenide". PC Magazine. March 25, 1997. Archived from the original on August 21, 2014. Retrieved August 16, 2014. Gordon Moore: ... the ability of the magnetic disk people to continue to increase the density is flabbergasting--that has moved at least as fast as the semiconductor complexity.
  80. Dubash, Manek (April 13, 2010). "Moore's Law is dead, says Gordon Moore". techworld.com. Archived from the original on July 6, 2014. Retrieved August 17, 2014. It can't continue forever. The nature of exponentials is that you push them out and eventually disaster happens.
  81. McCallum, John C. (2017). "Disk Drive Prices (1955–2017)". Archived from the original on July 11, 2017. Retrieved July 15, 2017.
  82. Decad, Gary M.; Robert E. Fontana Jr. (July 6, 2017). "A Look at Cloud Storage Component Technologies Trends and Future Projections". ibmsystemsmag.com. p. Table 1. Archived from the original on July 29, 2017. Retrieved July 21, 2014.
  83. Mellor, Chris (November 10, 2014). "Kryder's law craps out: Race to UBER-CHEAP STORAGE is OVER". theregister.co.uk. UK: The Register. Archived from the original on November 12, 2014. Retrieved November 12, 2014. The 2011 Thai floods almost doubled disk capacity cost/GB for a while. Rosenthal writes: 'The technical difficulties of migrating from PMR to HAMR, meant that already in 2010 the Kryder rate had slowed significantly and was not expected to return to its trend in the near future. The floods reinforced this.'
  84. Anderson, Dave (2013). "HDD Opportunities & Challenges, Now to 2020" (PDF). Seagate. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 25, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2014. 'PMR CAGR slowing from historical 40+% down to ~8-12%' and 'HAMR CAGR = 20-40% for 2015–2020'
  85. Plumer, Martin L.; et al. (March 2011). "New Paradigms in Magnetic Recording". Physics in Canada. 67 (1): 25–29. arXiv:1201.5543. Bibcode:2012arXiv1201.5543P.
  86. "Seagate Delivers On Technology Milestone: First to Ship Hard Drives Using Next-Generation Shingled Magnetic Recording" (Press release). New York: Seagate Technology plc. September 9, 2013. Archived from the original on October 9, 2014. Retrieved July 5, 2014. Shingled Magnetic Technology is the First Step to Reaching a 20 Terabyte Hard Drive by 2020
  87. Edge, Jake (March 26, 2014). "Support for shingled magnetic recording devices". LWN.net. Archived from the original on February 2, 2015. Retrieved January 7, 2015.
  88. Corbet, Jonathan (April 23, 2013). "LSFMM: A storage technology update". LWN.net. Archived from the original on January 7, 2015. Retrieved January 7, 2015. A 'shingled magnetic recording' (SMR) drive is a rotating drive that packs its tracks so closely that one track cannot be overwritten without destroying the neighboring tracks as well. The result is that overwriting data requires rewriting the entire set of closely-spaced tracks; that is an expensive tradeoff, but the benefit—much higher storage density—is deemed to be worth the cost in some situations.
  89. Shilov, Anton (December 18, 2015). "Hard Disk Drives with HAMR Technology Set to Arrive in 2018". Archived from the original on January 2, 2016. Retrieved January 2, 2016. Unfortunately, mass production of actual hard drives featuring HAMR has been delayed for a number of times already and now it turns out that the first HAMR-based HDDs are due in 2018. ... HAMR HDDs will feature a new architecture, require new media, completely redesigned read/write heads with a laser as well as a special near-field optical transducer (NFT) and a number of other components not used or mass produced today.
  90. Shilov, Anton (November 5, 2019). "Seagate: 18 TB HDD Due in First Half 2020, 20 TB Drive to Ship in Late 2020". Retrieved November 22, 2019.
  91. Mellor, Chris (August 28, 2019). "How long before SSDs replace nearline disk drives?". Retrieved November 15, 2019. Seagate CTO Dr John Morris told analysts that Seagate has built 55,000 HAMR drives and aims to get disks ready for customer sampling by the end of 2020.
  92. Rosenthal, David (May 16, 2018). "Longer talk at MSST2018". Retrieved November 22, 2019.
  93. Shilov, Anton (October 15, 2014). "TDK: HAMR technology could enable 15TB HDDs already in 2015". Retrieved November 15, 2019.
  94. Oliver, Bill (November 18, 2013). "WD Demos Future HDD Storage Tech: 60TB Hard Drives". Archived from the original on November 21, 2013. Retrieved November 15, 2019. …Seagate expects to start selling HAMR drives in 2016.
  95. "State of the Union: Seagate's HAMR Hard Drives, Dual-Actuator Mach2, and 24 TB HDDs on Track". Anandtech.com. Archived from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  96. "Will Toshiba's Bit-Patterned Drives Change the HDD Landscape?". PC Magazine. August 19, 2010. Archived from the original on August 22, 2010. Retrieved August 21, 2010.
  97. Rosenthal, David (May 16, 2018). "Longer talk at MSST2018". Retrieved November 22, 2019. The most recent Seagate roadmap pushes HAMR shipments into 2020, so they are now slipping faster than real-time. Western Digital has given up on HAMR and is promising that Microwave Assisted Magnetic Recording (MAMR) is only a year out. BPM has dropped off both companies' roadmaps.
  98. Mallary, Mike; et al. (July 2014). "Head and Media Challenges for 3 Tb/in2 Microwave-Assisted Magnetic Recording". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 50 (7): 1–8. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2014.2305693. S2CID 22858444.
  99. Li, Shaojing; Livshitz, Boris; Bertram, H. Neal; Schabes, Manfred; Schrefl, Thomas; Fullerton, Eric E.; Lomakin, Vitaliy (2009). "Microwave assisted magnetization reversal in composite media" (PDF). Applied Physics Letters. 94 (20): 202509. Bibcode:2009ApPhL..94t2509L. doi:10.1063/1.3133354. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  100. Mellor, Chris (September 3, 2019). "Western Digital debuts 18TB and 20TB MAMR disk drives". Retrieved November 23, 2019. …microwave-assisted magnetic (MAMR) recording technology…sample shipments are due by the end of the year.
  101. Wood, Roger (October 19, 2010). "Shingled Magnetic Recording and Two-Dimensional Magnetic Recording" (PDF). ewh.ieee.org. Hitachi GST. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 4, 2014. Retrieved August 4, 2014.
  102. Coughlin, Thomas; Grochowski, Edward (June 19, 2012). "Years of Destiny: HDD Capital Spending and Technology Developments from 2012–2016" (PDF). IEEE Santa Clara Valley Magnetics Society. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 2, 2013. Retrieved October 9, 2012.
  103. Bai, Zhaoqiang; Cai, Yongqing; Shen, Lei; Han, Guchang; Feng, Yuanping (2013). "All-Heusler giant-magnetoresistance junctions with matched energy bands and Fermi surfaces". arXiv:1301.6106 [cond-mat.mes-hall].
  104. "Perpendicular Magnetic Recording Explained - Animation". Archived from the original on October 6, 2018. Retrieved July 27, 2014.
  105. "Promising New Hard Disk Technology". Retrieved December 1, 2019.
  106. "Seagate Begins Shipping 16TB Hard Disk Drives". Archived from the original on November 9, 2019. Retrieved November 9, 2019.
  107. Information technology – Serial Attached SCSI – 2 (SAS-2), INCITS 457 Draft 2, May 8, 2009, chapter 4.1 Direct-access block device type model overview, The LBAs on a logical unit shall begin with zero and shall be contiguous up to the last logical block on the logical unit.
  108. ISO/IEC 791D:1994, AT Attachment Interface for Disk Drives (ATA-1), section 7.1.2
  109. "LBA Count for Disk Drives Standard (Document LBA1-03)" (PDF). IDEMA. June 15, 2009. Archived from the original on February 22, 2016. Retrieved February 14, 2016.
  110. "How to Measure Storage Efficiency – Part II – Taxes". Blogs.netapp.com. August 14, 2009. Archived from the original on July 20, 2011. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  111. "Low-Level Formatting". Archived from the original on June 4, 2017. Retrieved June 28, 2010.
  112. "Storage Solutions Guide" (PDF). Seagate. October 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 20, 2013. Retrieved June 8, 2013.
  113. "MKxx33GSG MK1235GSL r1" (PDF). Toshiba. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 22, 2009. Retrieved January 7, 2013.
  114. "650 RAMAC announcement". January 23, 2003. Archived from the original on June 5, 2011. Retrieved May 23, 2011.
  115. Mulvany, R.B., "Engineering Design of a Disk Storage Facility with Data Modules". IBM JRD, November 1974
  116. Introduction to IBM Direct Access Storage Devices, M. Bohl, IBM publication SR20-4738. 1981.
  117. CDC Product Line Card Archived June 5, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, October 1974.
  118. Apple Support Team. "How OS X and iOS report storage capacity". Apple, Inc. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 15, 2015.
  119. "df(1) – Linux man page". linux.die.net. Archived from the original on July 18, 2015. Retrieved July 18, 2015.
  120. "Western Digital Settles Hard-Drive Capacity Lawsuit, Associated Press June 28, 2006". Fox News. March 22, 2001. Archived from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  121. Cogar, Phil (October 26, 2007). "Seagate lawsuit concludes, settlement announced". Bit-tech.net. Archived from the original on March 20, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  122. "Western Digital – Notice of Class Action Settlement email". Xtremesystems.org. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  123. "Hard Drive Cost Per Gigabyte". Backblaze. July 11, 2017. Archived from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  124. Emerson W. Pugh, Lyle R. Johnson, John H. Palmer IBM's 360 and early 370 systems MIT Press, 1991 ISBN 0-262-16123-0, page 266.
  125. Flash price fall shakes HDD market, EETimes Asia, August 1, 2007. Archived February 1, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  126. In 2008 Samsung Archived June 16, 2011, at the Wayback Machine introduced the 1.3-inch SpinPoint A1 HDD but by March 2009 the family was listed as End Of Life Products and new 1.3-inch models were not available in this size. Archived February 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine
  127. Kearns, Dave (April 18, 2001). "How to defrag". ITWorld. Archived from the original on February 20, 2010. Retrieved November 26, 2010.
  128. Broida, Rick (April 10, 2009). "Turning Off Disk Defragmenter May Solve a Sluggish PC". PCWorld. Archived from the original on November 8, 2010. Retrieved November 26, 2010.
  129. "Speed Considerations". Seagate. Archived from the original on February 10, 2011. Retrieved January 22, 2011.
  130. "GLOSSARY of DRIVE and COMPUTER TERMS". Seagate. Retrieved August 4, 2018.
  131. Albrecht, Thomas R.; Arora, Hitesh; Ayanoor-Vitikkate, Vipin; Beaujour, Jean-Marc; Bedau, Daniel; Berman, David; Bogdanov, Alexei L.; Chapuis, Yves-Andre; Cushen, Julia; Dobisz, Elizabeth E.; Doerk, Gregory; He Gao; Grobis, Michael; Gurney, Bruce; Hanson, Weldon; Hellwig, Olav; Hirano, Toshiki; Jubert, Pierre-Olivier; Kercher, Dan; Lille, Jeffrey; Zuwei Liu; Mate, C. Mathew; Obukhov, Yuri; Patel, Kanaiyalal C.; Rubin, Kurt; Ruiz, Ricardo; Schabes, Manfred; Lei Wan; Weller, Dieter; et al. (2015). "Bit Patterned Magnetic Recording: Theory, Media Fabrication, and Recording Performance". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. HGST, a Western Digital Company. 51 (5): 1–42. arXiv:1503.06664. Bibcode:2015ITM....5197880A. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2015.2397880. S2CID 33974771.
  132. "Reed Solomon Codes – Introduction". Archived from the original on July 8, 2011.
  133. Mueler, Scott (February 24, 2019). "Micro House PC Hardware Library Volume I: Hard Drives". Macmillan Computer Publishing. Archived from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  134. "Ruggedized Disk Drives for Commercial Airborne Computer Systems" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 4, 2012.
  135. Grabianowski, Ed (May 29, 2009). "How To Recover Lost Data from Your Hard Drive". HowStuffWorks. pp. 5–6. Archived from the original on November 5, 2012. Retrieved October 24, 2012.
  136. "Everything You Know About Disks Is Wrong". Storagemojo.com. February 22, 2007. Archived from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  137. Pinheiro, Eduardo; Wolf-Dietrich Weber; Luiz André Barroso (February 2007). "Failure Trends in a Large Disk Drive Population" (PDF). Google Inc. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 5, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2011.
  138. Investigation: Is Your SSD More Reliable Than A Hard Drive? – Tom's Hardware long term SSD reliability review, 2011, "final words"
  139. "Hard Drive Data and Stats". Retrieved November 24, 2019.
  140. Anthony, Sebastian. "Using SMART to accurately predict when a hard drive is about to die". ExtremeTech. Archived from the original on August 31, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  141. "Consumer hard drives as reliable as enterprise hardware". Alphr. Archived from the original on September 11, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  142. Beach, Brian (December 4, 2013). "Enterprise Drives: Fact or Fiction?". Backblaze. Archived from the original on August 18, 2015. Retrieved August 25, 2015.
  143. Donnell, Deirdre O. "Seagate introduces world-first 16TB Exos HDD and IronWolf NAS drives". Notebookcheck.
  144. "BarraCuda en BarraCuda Pro interne harde schijven | Seagate Nederland". Archived from the original on May 6, 2019. Retrieved November 9, 2019.
  145. "16 TB MAMR Hard Drives in 2019: Western Digital". Archived from the original on May 24, 2019. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  146. "Enterprise-class versus Desktop class Hard Drives" (PDF). Intel. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 3, 2016. Retrieved September 25, 2013.
  147. "Seagate Cheetah 15K.5 Data Sheet" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 28, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
  148. Petersen, Martin K. (August 30, 2008). "Linux Data Integrity" (PDF). Oracle Corporation. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 9, 2015. Retrieved January 23, 2015. Most disk drives use 512-byte sectors. [...] Enterprise drives (Parallel SCSI/SAS/FC) support 520/528 byte 'fat' sectors.
  149. Decad, Gary M.; Robert E. Fontana Jr. (May 15, 2018). "A Ten Year (2008-2017) Storage Landscape LTO Tape Media, HDD, NAND" (PDF). Retrieved November 23, 2019.
  150. Shilov, Anton (May 3, 2019). "Shipments of PC Hard Drives Predicted to Drop By Nearly 50% in 2019". Retrieved November 22, 2019. According to Nidec's data, unit sales of hard drives declined by around 43% from 2010 to 2018, going from around 650 million units in 2010 to 375 million units in 2018. And it looks like sales will continue to drop in the coming years. Recently Nidec revised its HDD shipment forecast downwards from 356 million drives to 309 million drives in 2019, which will further drop to 290 million units in 2020.
  151. "2018 Hard Disk Drive Results". Forbes. Archived from the original on May 26, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2019.
  152. Shilov, Anton (March 2, 2016). "Hard Drive Shipments Drop by Nearly 17% in 2015". Archived from the original on July 7, 2016. Retrieved July 5, 2016.
  153. "Force Series Gen.4 PCIe MP600 2TB NVMe M.2 SSD". www.corsair.com. Retrieved March 6, 2020.
  154. "Intel Optane SSD 900P Series Review". StorageReview.com. March 16, 2018. Archived from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  155. Schroeder, Bianca; Lagisetty, Raghav; Merchant, Arif (February 22, 2016). "Flash Reliability in Production: The Expected and the Unexpected" (PDF). Retrieved November 25, 2019.
  156. "You won't be able to afford Samsung's record-setting 30TB SSD". Bgr.com. February 20, 2018. Archived from the original on April 10, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  157. Circuit Breaker. "Samsung unveils world's largest SSD with whopping 30TB of storage". The Verge. Archived from the original on January 27, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  158. "Advantages". Nimbus Data. Archived from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  159. "Scalable SSDs". Nimbus Data. Archived from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  160. "Samsung's massive 15TB SSD can be yours - for about $10K". Computerworld. July 27, 2016. Archived from the original on December 31, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  161. McGrath, Dylan (February 20, 2019). "Toshiba Claims Highest-Capacity NAND". Retrieved November 24, 2019.
  162. Bedford, Tom (December 4, 2018). "Seagate reveals world's largest, and most ludicrous 16TB HDD". Alphr. Archived from the original on December 24, 2018. Retrieved December 24, 2018.
  163. Coughlin, Tom (June 7, 2016). "3D NAND Enables Larger Consumer SSDs". forbes.com. Archived from the original on June 16, 2016. Retrieved July 4, 2016.
  164. "Seagate Backup Plus External Hard Drive Review (8TB)". storagereview.com. Archived from the original on July 25, 2015. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
  165. https://www.storagereview.com/review/wd-my-passport-wireless-review
  166. "Back Up Your Important Data to External Hard disk drive | Biometric Safe | Info and Products Reviews about Biometric Security Device –". Biometricsecurityproducts.org. July 26, 2011. Archived from the original on May 25, 2012. Retrieved April 26, 2012.
  167. "Western Digital My Passport, 2 TB". hwigroup.net. Archived from the original on October 5, 2013. Retrieved January 11, 2014. Example of a pre-assembled external hard disk drive without its enclosure that cannot be used internally on a laptop or desktop due to the embedded interface on its printed circuit board
  168. Hsiung, Sebean (May 5, 2010). "How to bypass USB controller and use as a SATA drive". datarecoverytools.co.uk. Archived from the original on September 15, 2014. Retrieved January 11, 2014.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.