Lithium iron phosphate battery

The lithium iron phosphate battery (LiFePO
) or LFP battery (lithium ferrophosphate), is a type of lithium-ion battery using LiFePO
as the cathode material (on a battery this is the positive side), and a graphitic carbon electrode with a metallic backing as the anode. The energy density of LiFePO
is lower than that of lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO
), and also has a lower operating voltage. The main drawback of LiFePO
is its low electrical conductivity. Therefore, all the LiFePO
cathodes under consideration are actually LiFePO
/C.[5] Because of low cost, low toxicity, well-defined performance, long-term stability, etc. LiFePO
is finding a number of roles in vehicle use, utility scale stationary applications, and backup power.[6] LFP batteries are cobalt-free.[7]

Lithium iron phosphate battery
Specific energy90–160 Wh/kg (320–580 J/g or kJ/kg)[1]
Energy density325 Wh/L (1200 kJ/L)[1]
Specific poweraround 200 W/kg[2]
Energy/consumer-price3.0–24 Wh/US$[3]
Time durability> 10 years
Cycle durability2,000-12000[4] cycles
Nominal cell voltage3.2 V


is a natural mineral of the olivine family (triphylite). Arumugam Manthiram and John B. Goodenough first identified the polyanion class of cathode materials for lithium ion batteries.[8][9][10] LiFePO
was then identified as a cathode material belonging to the polyanion class for use in batteries in 1996 by Padhi et al.[11][12] Reversible extraction of lithium from LiFePO
and insertion of lithium into FePO
was demonstrated. Because of its low cost, non-toxicity, the natural abundance of iron, its excellent thermal stability, safety characteristics, electrochemical performance, and specific capacity (170 mA·h/g, or 610 C/g) it has gained considerable market acceptance.[13][14]

The chief barrier to commercialization was its intrinsically low electrical conductivity. This problem was overcome by reducing the particle size, coating the LiFePO
particles with conductive materials such as carbon nanotubes,[15][16] or both. This approach was developed by Michel Armand and his coworkers.[17] Another approach by Yet Ming Chiang's group consisted of doping[13] LFP with cations of materials such as aluminium, niobium, and zirconium.

MIT introduced a new coating that allows the ions to move more easily within the battery. The "Beltway Battery" utilizes a bypass system that allows the lithium ions to enter and leave the electrodes at a speed great enough to fully charge a battery in under a minute. The scientists discovered that by coating lithium iron phosphate particles in a glassy material called lithium pyrophosphate, ions bypass the channels and move faster than in other batteries. Rechargeable batteries store and discharge energy as charged atoms (ions) are moved between two electrodes, the anode and the cathode. Their charge and discharge rate are restricted by the speed with which these ions move. Such technology could reduce the weight and size of the batteries. A small prototype battery cell has been developed that can fully charge in 10 to 20 seconds, compared with six minutes for standard battery cells.[18]

Negative electrodes (anode, on discharge) made of petroleum coke were used in early lithium-ion batteries; later types used natural or synthetic graphite.[19]

Advantages and disadvantages

The LiFePO
battery uses a lithium-ion-derived chemistry and shares many advantages and disadvantages with other lithium-ion battery chemistries. However, there are significant differences.

LFP contain neither nickel[20] nor cobalt, both of which are supply-constrained and expensive. Human rights concerns have been raised concerning the use of mined cobalt in batteries for distributed energy, home storage, and EVs.[21]

LFP chemistry offers a longer cycle life than other lithium-ion approaches.[22]

Like nickel-based rechargeable batteries (and unlike other lithium ion batteries),[23] LiFePO
batteries have a very constant discharge voltage. Voltage stays close to 3.2 V during discharge until the cell is exhausted. This allows the cell to deliver virtually full power until it is discharged, and it can greatly simplify or even eliminate the need for voltage regulation circuitry.

Because of the nominal 3.2 V output, four cells can be placed in series for a nominal voltage of 12.8 V. This comes close to the nominal voltage of six-cell lead-acid batteries. Along with the good safety characteristics of LFP batteries, this makes LFP a good potential replacement for lead-acid batteries in applications such as automotive and solar applications, provided the charging systems are adapted not to damage the LFP cells through excessive charging voltages (beyond 3.6 volts DC per cell while under charge), temperature-based voltage compensation, equalisation attempts or continuous trickle charging. The LFP cells must be at least balanced initially before the pack is assembled and a protection system also needs to be implemented to ensure no cell can be discharged below a voltage of 2.5 V or severe damage will occur in most instances.

The use of phosphates avoids cobalt's cost and environmental concerns, particularly concerns about cobalt entering the environment through improper disposal.[22]

has higher current or peak-power ratings than lithium cobalt oxide LiCoO

The energy density (energy/volume) of a new LFP battery is some 14% lower than that of a new LiCoO
battery.[25] Also, many brands of LFPs, as well as cells within a given brand of LFP batteries, have a lower discharge rate than lead-acid or LiCoO
. Since discharge rate is a percentage of battery capacity, a higher rate can be achieved by using a larger battery (more ampere hours) if low-current batteries must be used. Better yet, a high-current LFP cell (which will have a higher discharge rate than a lead acid or LiCoO
battery of the same capacity) can be used.

cells experience a slower rate of capacity loss (aka greater calendar-life) than lithium-ion battery chemistries such as LiCoO
cobalt or LiMn
manganese spinel lithium-ion polymer batteries (LiPo battery) or lithium-ion batteries.[26] After one year on the shelf, a LiFePO
cell typically has approximately the same energy density as a LiCoO
Li-ion cell, because of LFP's slower decline of energy density.


One important advantage over other lithium-ion chemistries is thermal and chemical stability, which improves battery safety.[22] LiFePO
is an intrinsically safer cathode material than LiCoO
and manganese spinel, through omission of the cobalt, with its negative temperature coefficient of resistance that can encourage thermal runaway. The PO bond in the (PO
ion is stronger than the CoO bond in the (CoO
ion, so that when abused (short-circuited, overheated, etc.), the oxygen atoms are released more slowly. This stabilization of the redox energies also promotes faster ion migration.[23]

As lithium migrates out of the cathode in a LiCoO
cell, the CoO
undergoes non-linear expansion that affects the structural integrity of the cell. The fully lithiated and unlithiated states of LiFePO
are structurally similar which means that LiFePO
cells are more structurally stable than LiCoO

No lithium remains in the cathode of a fully charged LiFePO
cell. (In a LiCoO
cell, approximately 50% remains.) LiFePO
is highly resilient during oxygen loss, which typically results in an exothermic reaction in other lithium cells.[14] As a result, LiFePO
cells are harder to ignite in the event of mishandling (especially during charge). The LiFePO
battery does not decompose at high temperatures.[22]


Multiple Lithium Iron Phosphate cells are wired in series and parallel to create a 2800Ah 52V battery. Total battery capacity is 145.6 kWh. Note the large, solid tinned copper busbar connecting the cells together. This busbar is rated for 700 Amps DC to accommodate the high currents generated in a 48 Volt DC system.
Lithium Iron Phosphate LiFePO4 Cells, each 700 Ah Amp Hours 3.25 Volts. Two cells are wired in parallel to create a single 3.25V 1400Ah battery with a capacity of 4.55 kWh.
  • Cell voltage
    • Minimum discharge voltage = 2.5 V[27]
    • Working voltage = 3.0 ~ 3.2 V
    • Maximum charge voltage = 3.65 V[28]
  • Volumetric energy density = 220 Wh/L (790 kJ/L)
  • Gravimetric energy density > 90 Wh/kg[29] (> 320 J/g). Up to 160 Wh/kg[1] (580 J/g).
  • 100% DOD cycle life (number of cycles to 80% of original capacity) = 2,000–7,000[30]
  • 10% DOD cycle life (number of cycles to 80% of original capacity) > 10,000[31]
  • Cathode composition (weight)
  • Cell configuration
  • Experimental conditions:
    • Room temperature
    • Voltage limits: 2.0–3.65 V
    • Charge: Up to C/1 rate up to 3.6 V, then constant voltage at 3.6 V until I < C/24
  • According to one manufacturer, lithium iron phosphate batteries in an electric car can be charged at a fast charging station to 80% within 15 minutes, and 100% within 40 minutes.[32]


Home energy storage

Enphase produces LFP batteries in 3kWHr and 10kWHr sizes for home energy storage, distributed energy, off-grid, and microgrid use.


Higher discharge rates needed for acceleration, lower weight and longer life makes this battery type ideal for forklifts, bicycles and electric cars. 12V LiFePO4 batteries are also gaining popularity as a second (house) battery for a caravan, motor-home or boat.

Solar-powered lighting systems

Single "14500" (AA battery–sized) LFP cells are now used in some solar-powered landscape lighting instead of 1.2 V NiCd/NiMH.

LFP's higher (3.2 V) working voltage lets a single cell drive an LED without circuitry to step up the voltage. Its increased tolerance to modest overcharging (compared to other Li cell types) means that LiFePO
can be connected to photovoltaic cells without circuitry to halt the recharge cycle. The ability to drive an LED from a single LFP cell also obviates battery holders, and thus the corrosion, condensation and dirt issues associated with products using multiple removable rechargeable batteries.

By 2013, better solar-charged passive infrared security lamps emerged.[33] As AA-sized LFP cells have a capacity of only 600 mAh (while the lamp's bright LED may draw 60 mA), the units shine for at most 10 hours. However, if triggering is only occasional, such units may be satisfactory even charging in low sunlight, as lamp electronics ensure after-dark "idle" currents of under 1 mA.

Other uses

Many home EV conversions use the large format versions as the car's traction pack. With the advantageous power-to-weight ratios, high safety features and the chemistry's resistance to thermal runaway, there are few barriers for use by amateur home "makers". Motorhomes are often converted to lithium iron phosphate because of the high draw.

Some electronic cigarettes use these types of batteries. Other applications include flashlights, radio-controlled models, portable motor-driven equipment, amateur radio equipment, industrial sensor systems[34] and emergency lighting.[35]

See also


  1. "Great Power Group, Square lithium-ion battery". Retrieved 2019-12-31.
  2. "12,8 Volt Lithium-Iron-Phosphate Batteries" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-09-21. Retrieved 2016-04-20.
  3. "Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Suppliers and Manufacturers". Archived from the original on 2014-06-09.
  4. "CATL wants to deliver LFP batteries for ESS at 'multi-gigawatt-hour scale' into Europe and US-CATL". Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL). Retrieved 3 October 2020.
  5. Eftekhari, Ali (2017). "LiFePO
    /C Nanocomposites for Lithium-Ion Batteries". Journal of Power Sources. 343: 395–411. Bibcode:2017JPS...343..395E. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.080.
  8. Masquelier, Christian; Croguennec, Laurence (2013). "Polyanionic (Phosphates, Silicates, Sulfates) Frameworks as Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Li (or Na) Batteries". Chemical Reviews. 113 (8): 6552–6591. doi:10.1021/cr3001862. PMID 23742145.
  9. Manthiram, A.; Goodenough, J. B. (1989). "Lithium insertion into Fe2(SO4)3 frameworks". Journal of Power Sources. 26 (3–4): 403–408. Bibcode:1989JPS....26..403M. doi:10.1016/0378-7753(89)80153-3.
  10. Manthiram, A.; Goodenough, J. B. (1987). "Lithium insertion into Fe2(MO4)3 frameworks: Comparison of M = W with M = Mo". Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 71 (2): 349–360. Bibcode:1987JSSCh..71..349M. doi:10.1016/0022-4596(87)90242-8.
  11. "LiFePO
    : A Novel Cathode Material for Rechargeable Batteries", A.K. Padhi, K.S. Nanjundaswamy, J.B. Goodenough, Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts, 96-1, May, 1996, pp 73
  12. “Phospho-olivines as Positive-Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries” A. K. Padhi, K. S. Nanjundaswamy, and J. B. Goodenough, J. Electrochem. Soc., Volume 144, Issue 4, pp. 1188-1194 (April 1997)
  13. Gorman, Jessica (September 28, 2002). "Bigger, Cheaper, Safer Batteries: New material charges up lithium-ion battery work". Science News. Vol. 162 no. 13. p. 196. Archived from the original on 2008-04-13.
  14. "Building safer Li ion batteries". Archived from the original on 2011-01-31.
  15. Susantyoko, Rahmat Agung; Karam, Zainab; Alkhoori, Sara; Mustafa, Ibrahim; Wu, Chieh-Han; Almheiri, Saif (2017). "A surface-engineered tape-casting fabrication technique toward the commercialisation of freestanding carbon nanotube sheets". Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 5 (36): 19255–19266. doi:10.1039/c7ta04999d. ISSN 2050-7488.
  16. Susantyoko, Rahmat Agung; Alkindi, Tawaddod Saif; Kanagaraj, Amarsingh Bhabu; An, Boohyun; Alshibli, Hamda; Choi, Daniel; AlDahmani, Sultan; Fadaq, Hamed; Almheiri, Saif (2018). "Performance optimization of freestanding MWCNT-LiFePO₄ sheets as cathodes for improved specific capacity of lithium-ion batteries". RSC Advances. 8 (30): 16566–16573. doi:10.1039/c8ra01461b. ISSN 2046-2069.
  17. Armand, Michel; Goodenough, John B.; Padhi, Akshaya K.; Nanjundaswam, Kirakodu S.; Masquelier, Christian (Feb 4, 2003), Cathode materials for secondary (rechargeable) lithium batteries, archived from the original on 2016-04-02, retrieved 2016-02-25
  18. "New Battery Technology Charges in Seconds". Alternative Energy News. March 18, 2009. Archived from the original on 2012-08-02.
  19. David Linden (ed.), Handbook of Batteries 3rd Edition,McGraw Hill 2002, ISBN 0-07-135978-8, pages 35-16 and 35-17
  22. "Rechargeable Lithium Batteries". Electropaedia — Battery and Energy Technologies. Archived from the original on 2011-07-14.
  23. "Lithium Ion batteries | Lithium Polymer | Lithium Iron Phosphate". Harding Energy. Archived from the original on 2016-03-29. Retrieved 2016-04-06.
  24. Hadhazy, Adam (2009-03-11). "A Better Battery? The Lithium Ion Cell Gets Supercharged". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 2013-10-23.
  25. Guo, Yu-Guo; Hu, Jin-Song; Wan, Li-Jun (2008). "Nanostructured Materials for Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage Devices". Advanced Materials. 20 (15): 2878–2887. doi:10.1002/adma.200800627.
  26. "ANR26650M1". A123Systems. 2006. Archived from the original on 2012-03-01. ...Current test projecting excellent calendar life: 17% impedance growth and 23% capacity loss in 15 [fifteen!] years at 100% SOC, 60 deg. C...
  27. "Cell — CA Series". Archived from the original on 2014-10-09.
  28. "LiFePO4 Battery". Retrieved 2020-09-24.
  29. "Large-Format, Lithium Iron Phosphate". 2008-02-23. Archived from the original on 2008-11-18. Retrieved 2012-04-24.
  30. "Specification of the lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) battery". Nomo Group Co. Jul 14, 2017.
  31. GWL-Power: Winston 90Ah over 10.000 /13.000 cycles Archived 2013-10-04 at the Wayback Machine, PDF, 21. February 2012.
  32. Archived 2016-02-06 at the Wayback Machine Website of BYD: 40(min) / 15(min 80%)
  33. "IECEx System". Retrieved 2018-08-26.
  34. "EM ready2apply BASIC 1 – 2 W". Tridonic. Retrieved 23 October 2018.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.