John Russell, 1st Earl Russell
John Russell, 1st Earl Russell, KG, GCMG, PC, FRS (18 August 1792 – 28 May 1878), known by his courtesy title Lord John Russell before 1861, was a British Whig and Liberal statesman who served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1846 to 1852 and again from 1865 to 1866.
The Earl Russell | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russell photographed by Mayall in 1861 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 29 October 1865 – 26 June 1866 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | The Viscount Palmerston | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | The Earl of Derby | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 30 June 1846 – 21 February 1852 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | Robert Peel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | The Earl of Derby | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leader of the Opposition | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 28 June 1866 – 3 December 1868 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | The Earl of Derby | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | Benjamin Disraeli | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 23 February 1852 – 19 December 1852 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | The Earl of Derby | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | The Earl of Derby | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 18 June 1859 – 3 November 1865 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Minister | The Viscount Palmerston | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | The Earl of Malmesbury | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | The Earl of Clarendon | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 28 December 1852 – 21 February 1853 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Minister | The Earl of Aberdeen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | The Earl of Malmesbury | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | The Earl of Clarendon | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secretary of State for the Colonies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 23 February 1855 – 21 July 1855 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Minister | The Viscount Palmerston | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | Sidney Herbert | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | Sir William Molesworth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lord President of the Council | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 12 June 1854 – 8 February 1855 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Minister | The Earl of Aberdeen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | The Earl Granville | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | The Earl Granville | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secretary of State for War and the Colonies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 30 August 1839 – 30 August 1841 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | Victoria | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Minister | The Viscount Melbourne | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | The Marquess of Normanby | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | Lord Stanley | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secretary of State for the Home Department | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 18 April 1835 – 30 August 1839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Minister | The Viscount Melbourne | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | Henry Goulburn | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | The Marquess of Normanby | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paymaster of the Forces | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In office 30 December 1830 – 30 December 1834 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Monarch | William IV | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime Minister | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preceded by | John Calcraft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Succeeded by | Sir Edward Knatchbull | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal details | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Born | John Russell 18 August 1792 Mayfair, Middlesex, England | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Died | 28 May 1878 85) Richmond Park, Surrey, England | (aged||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resting place | St Michael's, Chenies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Political party | Liberal (1859–1878) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other political affiliations | Whig (before 1859) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spouse(s) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Children | 6, including John and Rollo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Father | 6th Duke of Bedford | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alma mater | University of Edinburgh | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signature |
The third son of the later 6th Duke of Bedford, Russell was educated at Westminster School and Edinburgh University before entering Parliament in 1813. In 1828 he took a leading role in the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts which discriminated against Catholics and Protestant dissenters. He was one of the principle architects of the Reform Act 1832, which was the first major reform of Parliament since the Restoration, and the first step on the road to democracy and away from rule by the aristocracy and landed gentry. He favoured expanding the right to vote to the middle classes and enfranchising Britain's growing industrial towns and cities but he never advocated universal suffrage and he opposed the secret ballot. Russell was outspoken on many issues over the course of his career, advocating Catholic emancipation in the 1820s, calling for the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1845, denouncing the revival of Catholic bishoprics in 1850, and supporting Italian unification during the 1860s.
Russell's ministerial career spanned four decades. In additional to his two terms as Prime Minister, between 1831 and 1865 he served in the cabinets of Earl Grey, Viscount Melbourne, the Earl of Aberdeen, and Viscount Palmerston. Russell's relationship with Palmerston was often stormy and contributed to bringing down Russell's first government in 1852 and Palmerston's first government in 1858. However, their renewed alliance from 1859 was one of the foundations of the united Liberal Party, which would go on to dominate British politics in the following decades. While Russell was an energetic and effective minister during the 1830s, and helped to commit the Whigs to a reform agenda, he proved less successful as Prime Minister. During his two periods as Prime Minister he often suffered from a disunited cabinet and weak support in the House of Commons, meaning he was unable to carry out much of his agenda. During his first premiership his government failed to deal effectively with the Irish Famine, a disaster which saw the loss of a quarter of Ireland's population through death and emigration. He mishandled the reform movement during his second premiership, and was forced from office only to watch Derby and Disraeli carry a stronger Reform Bill.[1] It has been said that Russell's ministry of 1846–1852 was the ruin of the old Whig party and that his ministry of 1865–1866 was very nearly the ruin of the Liberal Party that took its place.[2]
Background and education
Russell was born small and premature on 18 August 1792 into the highest echelons of the British aristocracy, being the third son of John Russell, later 6th Duke of Bedford, and Georgiana Byng, daughter of George Byng, 4th Viscount Torrington. The Russell family had been one of the principal Whig dynasties in England since the 17th century, and were among the richest handful of aristocratic landowning families in the country, but as a younger son of the 6th Duke of Bedford, he was not expected to inherit the family estates. As a younger son of a duke, he bore the courtesy title "Lord John Russell", but he was not a peer in his own right. He was, therefore, able to sit in the House of Commons until he was made an earl in 1861 and was elevated to the House of Lords.
After being withdrawn from Westminster School due to ill health, Russell was educated by tutors. He attended the University of Edinburgh from 1809 to 1812, lodging with Professor John Playfair, who oversaw his studies.[3] He did not take a degree. Although of small stature—he grew to no more than 5 feet 4-and-three-quarter inches tall[4]—and often in poor health, he travelled widely in Britain and on the continent,[5] and held commission as Captain in the Bedfordshire Militia in 1810.[4] During his continental travels Russell visited Spain where his brother was serving as aide-de-camp to Lord Wellington in the Peninsula War.[6] The following year he had a 90-minute meeting with Napoleon in December 1814 during the former emperor's exile at Elba.[7]
Public life
Backbench MP: 1813-1830
Russell entered the House of Commons as a Whig in 1813 at the age of 20. The future reformer gained his seat by virtue of his father, the Duke of Bedford, instructing the 30 or so electors of Tavistock to return him as an MP even though at the time Russell was abroad and under age.[8] In June 1815 Russell denounced the Bourbon Restoration and Britain's declaration of war against the recently returned Napoleon, arguing in the House of Commons that foreign powers had no right to dictate France's form of government.[9] In 1819 Russell embraced the cause of parliamentary reform and he led the more reformist wing of the Whigs throughout the 1820s. In 1828, while still an opposition backbencher, Russell introduced a Sacramental Test bill with the aim of abolishing the prohibitions on Catholics and Protestant dissenters being elected to local government and from holding civil and military offices. The bill gained the backing of the Tory Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel and was passed into law.
Minister under Grey and Melbourne: 1830-1841
When the Whigs came to power in 1830, Russell entered Earl Grey's government as Paymaster of the Forces, and was soon elevated to the Cabinet. He was one of the principal leaders of the fight for the Reform Act 1832, earning the nickname "Finality Jack" from his complacently pronouncing the Act a final measure.[lower-alpha 1] In May 1834 Russell made a speech on the Irish Tithes bill, in which he argued that the revenue generated by tithes was more than was justified by the size of the established Protestant church in Ireland. Russell argued that a proportion the tithe revenue should instead be appropriated for the education of the Irish poor, regardless of denomination.[10] The speech was seen by its opponents as an attack on the established church in Ireland and it cemented a split within Grey's government over the issue of Irish tithes.[11] The following month four members of the Cabinet resigned over the issue, weakening the government's hold on Parliament.[12] Sensing that his position was now hopeless, Grey offered his resignation to the King in July, and was replaced by Viscount Melbourne at the head of the government.
In November 1834, when the leader of the Commons, Lord Althorp, succeeded to the peerage as Earl Spencer, Russell became the leader of the Whigs in the Commons. Russell's appointment prompted King William IV to terminate Melbourne's government, in part because the King objected to Russell's views on the Irish Church.[13] This remains the last time in British history that a monarch has dismissed a government.[14] The subsequent minority Conservative government lasted less than five months before resigning in April 1835. Russell then returned to office as Home Secretary in Melbourne's second government, before serving as Secretary of State for War and the Colonies from 1839 to 1841. Through this period Russell continued to lead the more reformist wing of the Whig party.
As Home Secretary Russell recommended and secured royal pardons for the Tolpuddle Martyrs and partial commutation of their sentences.[15][16] In 1836 he introduced the Marriages Act, which legalised civil marriages in England & Wales and allowed Catholics and Protestant Dissenters to marry in their own churches.[17] In 1837 he steered a series of seven Acts through Parliament, which together reduced the number of offences carrying a sentence of death from thirty-seven to sixteen.[18][19] This number was reduced further by the Substitution of Punishments of Death Act 1841. After these reforms the death penalty was rarely used in the United Kingdom for crimes other than murder. As Home Secretary Russell also introduced the public registration for births, marriages and deaths and played a large role in democratising the government of cities outside of London.
Opposition: 1841-1846
In 1841 the Whigs lost the general election to the Conservatives and Russell and his colleagues returned to opposition. In November 1845, following the failure of that year's potato harvest across Britain and Ireland, Russell came out in favour of the repeal of the Corn Laws and called upon the Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel to take urgent action to alleviate the emerging food crisis.[20] Peel had by this time already become convinced of the need for repeal but he was opposed in this by the majority of his own cabinet and party. On 11 December 1845, frustrated by his party's unwillingness to support him on repeal, Peel resigned as Prime Minister and Queen Victoria invited Russell to form a new government. With the Whigs a minority in the Commons however, Russell struggled to assemble the necessary support. When Lord Grey declared that he would not serve in cabinet if Lord Palmerston was made Foreign Secretary it became clear to Russell that he could not form a viable government.[21] Russell declined the Queen's invitation on 21 December and Peel agreed to stay on as Prime Minister. In June the following year Peel repealed the Corn Laws with Whig support, bitterly dividing the Conservative Party in the process. Later that same night Peel's Irish Coercion Bill was defeated after vengeful anti-repeal Tories voted with the opposition and Peel, taking this as a vote of no confidence, resigned as Prime Minister.[22] Russell accepted the Queen's offer to form a government, this time Grey not objecting to Palmerston's appointment.[23]
Prime Minister: 1846–1852
Russell took office as Prime Minister with the Whigs only a minority in the House of Commons. It was the bitter split in the Conservative Party over the Corn Laws that allowed Russell's government to remain in power in spite of this, with Sir Robert Peel and his supporters offering tentative support to the new ministry in order to keep the protectionist Conservatives under Lord Stanley in opposition. Russell's premiership was frequently frustrated by his lack of a reliable Commons majority, and he was unable to secure many of the measures he wished to enact. Nevertheless, his government was able to secure some notable social reforms such as funding for teacher training and teachers' pensions, the Factories Act 1847, which restricted the working hours of women and young persons (aged 13–18) in textile mills to 10 hours per day, and the Public Health Act 1848, by which local government assumed responsibility for sewerage, clean water supply, refuse collection and other aspects of public health across much of England & Wales for the first time.[24][25]
Russell's government led the calamitous response to the Irish Famine. During the course of the famine, an estimated 1 million people died from a combination of malnutrition, disease and starvation and well over 1 million more were left with little choice but to emigrate from Ireland.[26] After taking office in 1846 Russell's ministry introduced a programme of public works that by the end of that year employed some half million but proved impossible to administer.[27] In January 1847, the government abandoned this policy, realising that it had failed, and turned to a mixture of "indoor" and "outdoor" direct relief; the former administered in workhouses through the Irish Poor Laws, the latter through soup kitchens. The costs of the Poor Law fell primarily on the local landlords, some of whom in turn attempted to reduce their liability by evicting their tenants.[27] In June 1847 the Poor Law Extension Act was passed, which embodied the principle, popular in Britain, that Irish property must support Irish poverty. Irish landlords were held in Britain to have created the conditions that led to the famine.[28]
In the general election of August 1847 the Whigs made gains at the expense of the Conservatives, but remained a minority, with Russell's government still dependent on the votes of Peelite and Irish Repealer MPs to win divisions in the Commons. Following the election of Lionel de Rothschild in the general election, Russell introduced a Jewish Relief bill, which would allow Rothschild and other Jews to sit in the House of Commons without taking the explicitly Christian oath of allegiance. In 1848, the bill was passed by the House of Commons, receiving support from the Whigs and a minority of Conservatives (including future Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli). However, it was twice rejected by the Tory dominated House of Lords, as was a new bill in 1851. Rothschild was reelected in the 1852 general election following the fall of the Russell government, but was unable to take his seat until the Jews Relief Act was finally passed in 1858.
Russell frequently clashed with his headstrong Foreign Secretary, Lord Palmerston, whose belligerence and support for continental revolution he found embarrassing. In 1847 Palmerston provoked a confrontation with the French government by undermining the plans of the Spanish court to marry the young Spanish Queen and her sister into the French royal family.[29] He subsequently clashed with Russell over plans to augment the army and navy in order to defend against the perceived threat of French invasion, which subsided with the overthrow of the French king in 1848.[30]
In 1850 further tension arose between the two over Palmerston's gunboat diplomacy in the Don Pacifico affair, in which Palmerston sought compensation from the Greek Government for the ransacking and burning of the house of David Pacifico, a Gibraltarian holder of a British passport.[31] Russell considered the matter "hardly worth the interposition of the British lion," and when Palmerston ignored some of his instructions, the Prime Minister wrote to Palmerston telling him he had informed the Queen that he "thought the interests of the country required that a change should take place at the Foreign Department."[32] However, less than a month later Lord Stanley successfully led the House of Lords into passing a motion of censure of the Government over its handling of the affair and Russell realised that he needed to align with Palmerston in order to prevent a similar motion being passed by the House of Commons, which would have obliged the Government to resign.[33] The Government prevailed, but Palmerston came out of the affair with his popularity at new heights since he was seen as the champion of defending British citizens anywhere in the world.[34]
In February 1851 Russell forced Palmerston to resign as Foreign Secretary after he recognised Napoleon III's coup of 2 December 1851 without first consulting the Queen or Cabinet.[35] Russell tried to strengthen his government by recruiting leading Peelites such as Sir James Graham and the Duke of Newcastle to his administration, but they declined.[36] Out of office, Palmerston sought revenge by turning a vote on a militia bill into a vote of confidence in the Government. A majority vote in favour of an amendment proposed by Palmerston caused the downfall of Russell's ministry on 21 February 1852. This was Palmerston's famous "tit for tat with Johnny Russell."[37]
In opposition: February–December 1852
Following Russell's resignation, on the 23 February 1852 Earl of Derby accepted the Queen's invitation to form a government. The new Conservative ministry could not command a majority in the Commons due to the continuing feud with the Peelites and so Derby called a general election for July, in the hopes of securing a majority. The 1852 general election saw the election of 330 Conservatives and 324 Whigs to the Parliament. Neither party had an overall majority, because 38 members who were technically Conservatives were actually Peelites.[37]
The new Parliament included 113 "Free Traders" who were more radical than the Peelites. They felt that the tariffs on all imported consumer goods should be removed, not just the tariff on wheat or corn. There were also 63 members of the "Irish Brigade," made up of Irish members interested in the Tenant Rights legislation for the protection of the tenant farmers in Ireland. None of these minor groups were interested in forming a government with the Conservatives because of the bitterness left over from the repeal of the Corn Laws. However, John Russell of the Whigs could not attract enough of the minor party members to form a government either. Other issues handled during the recent Russell government had alienated these three minor groups from the Whigs also. Derby's government feel in December 1852 following a vote against its Budget.[37]
Foreign Secretary
In the Aberdeen ministry: 1852–1853
Russell, as the leader of the Whig party, then brought it into a new coalition government with the Peelite Conservatives, headed by the Peelite Lord Aberdeen. Palmerston could not possibly be appointed as Foreign Secretary but he had to be a part of the new Aberdeen government and became Home Secretary. Russell continued to serve as leader of the Whig party in the House of Commons. As the leader of the largest party in the Aberdeen coalition government, Russell was needed in the new government. Accordingly, on 28 December 1852, Russell was appointed as Foreign Secretary.
In the eyes of many, including the Queen and Aberdeen, his jockeying for position against Palmerston was one of the causes of the inability of the administration to take a firm direction. It was a contest that Palmerston won. Having entered the administration as the expected Whig heir, Russell left it having been overtaken by Palmerston.[38]
Together with Palmerston, Russell was instrumental in getting Britain to join France in the Crimean War (1853–1856) to thwart the threat of Russia against the Ottoman Empire. They did so as members of the Aberdeen government and against the wishes of the cautious, Russophile Earl of Aberdeen. Lord Russell, frustrated by the Prime Minister's delays, resigned from the government on 21 February 1853. An 1855 motion in Parliament to investigate the mismanagement became a vote of confidence in the Aberdeen government and in the Secretary for War, the Duke of Newcastle. Accordingly, when the Roebuck motion passed, Aberdeen resigned. Russell was unable to form a government. Lord Palmerston formed a new government. John Russell, accepting the Colonial Office, was sent to Vienna to negotiate, but his proposals were rejected and he temporarily retired from politics in 1855.[39][40]
In the Palmerston ministry: 1859–1865
In 1859, following another short-lived Conservative government, Palmerston and Russell made up their differences, and Russell consented to serve as Foreign Secretary in a new Palmerston cabinet, usually considered the first true Liberal cabinet. This period was a particularly eventful one in the world outside Britain, seeing the Unification of Italy (the change of British government to one sympathetic to Italian nationalism had a marked part in this process[41]), the American Civil War, and the 1864 war over Schleswig-Holstein between Denmark and the German states. Russell arranged the London Conference of 1864, but failed to establish peace in the war. His tenure of the Foreign Office was noteworthy for the famous dispatch in which he defended Italian unification: "Her Majesty's Government will turn their eyes rather to the gratifying prospect of a people building up the edifice of their liberties, and consolidating the work of their independence, amid the sympathies and good wishes of Europe" (27 October 1860).[42]
House of Lords: 1861
In 1861 Russell was elevated to the peerage as Earl Russell, of Kingston Russell in the County of Dorset, and as Viscount Amberley, of Amberley in the County of Gloucester, and of Ardsalla in the County of Meath in the Peerage of the United Kingdom.[43] Henceforth, as a suo jure peer, rather than merely being known as 'Lord' because he was the son of a Duke, he sat in the House of Lords for the remainder of his career.
Prime Minister again: 1865–1866
When Palmerston suddenly died in late 1865, Russell again became Prime Minister. His second premiership was short and frustrating, and Russell failed in his great ambition of expanding the franchise, a task that would be left to his Conservative successors, Derby and Benjamin Disraeli. In 1866, party disunity again brought down his government. Russell never again held any office. His last contribution to the House of Lords was on 3 August 1875.[44]
Religious views
Russell was religious in a simple non-dogmatic way and supported the "Broad church" element in the Church of England. He opposed the "Oxford Movement" because its "Tractarian" members were too dogmatic and too close to Romanism. He supported Broad Churchmen or Latitudinarians by several appointments of liberal churchmen to vacant sees. In 1859 he reversed himself and decided to free non-Anglicans of the duty of paying rates (taxes) to the local Anglican parish. His political clumsiness and opposition to Church finance made him a target of attack and ridicule in many Church circles.[45][46][47]
Personal life
Russell married Adelaide Lister (widow of Thomas Lister, 2nd Baron Ribblesdale, who had died in 1832.[48]) on 11 April 1835. Together they had two daughters:
- Lady Georgiana Adelaide Russell (1836 – 25 September 1922). She married Archibald Peel (son of General Jonathan Peel) on 15 August 1867. They had seven children.
- Lady Victoria Russell (20 October 1838 – 9 May 1880). She married Henry Villiers (the son of The Honorable Henry Montagu Villiers) on 16 April 1861. They had ten children and left many descendants.[49]
Adelaide came down with a fever following the birth of their second child and died a few days later on died on 1 November 1838. Following her death, Russell continued to raise his late wife's four children from her first marriage, as well their two daughters.
On 20 July 1841 Russell remarried, to Lady Frances ("Fanny") Elliot-Murray-Kynynmound, daughter of Russell's cabinet colleague Gilbert Elliot, 2nd Earl of Minto. Together they had four children:
- John Russell, Viscount Amberley (10 December 1842 – 9 January 1876). He married The Hon. Katherine Stanley on 8 November 1864. They had four children, including a stillborn daughter.
- Hon. George Gilbert William Russell (14 April 1848 – 27 January 1933).
- Hon. Francis Albert Rollo Russell (11 July 1849 – 30 March 1914). He married Alice Godfrey (d. 12 May 1886) on 21 April 1885. They had one son. He remarried Gertrude Joachim on 28 April 1891. They had two children.
- Lady Mary Agatha Russell (1853 – 23 April 1933).
In 1847 Queen Victoria granted Pembroke Lodge in Richmond Park to Lord and Lady John. It remained their family home for the rest of their lives.[50][51]
Following the death of their daughter-in-law Viscountess Amberley in 1874 and their son Viscount Amberley in 1876, Earl Russell and Countess Russell brought up their orphaned grandchildren, John ("Frank") Russell, who became 2nd Earl Russell on his grandfather's death, and Bertrand Russell who would go on to become a noted philosopher and who in later life recalled his elderly grandfather as "a kindly old man in a wheelchair."[52]
Earl Russell died at home at Pembroke Lodge on 28 May 1878. The Prime Minister, the Earl of Beaconsfield, offered a public funeral and burial at Westminster Abbey for Russell but this was declined by Countess Russell in accordance with her late husband's wish to be buried among his family and ancestors.[53] He is buried at the 'Bedford Chapel' at St. Michael's Church, Chenies, Buckinghamshire.
Legacy and reputation
Scion of one of the most powerful aristocratic families, Russell was a leading reformer who weakened the power of the aristocracy. His great achievements, wrote A. J. P. Taylor, were based on his persistent battles in Parliament over the years on behalf of the expansion of liberty; after each loss he tried again and again, until finally, his efforts were largely successful.[2] E. L. Woodward, however, argued that he was too much the abstract theorist:
He was more concerned with the removal of obstacles to civil liberty than with the creation of a more reasonable and civilized society. His political theory centred in the revolution of 1688, and in the clique of aristocratic families to whom the country owed loyalty in return for something like the charte octroyée of the reform bill.
Nevertheless, Russell led his Whig party into support for reform; he was the principal architect of the Great Reform Act of 1832.
He was succeeded as Liberal leader by former Peelite William Gladstone, and was thus the last true Whig to serve as Prime Minister. Generally taken as the model for Anthony Trollope's Mr Mildmay, aspects of his character may also have suggested those of Plantagenet Palliser. An ideal statesman, said Trollope, should have "unblemished, unextinguishable, inexhaustible love of country.... But he should also be scrupulous, and, as being scrupulous, weak."[54]
The 1832 Reform Act and extension of the franchise to British cities are partly attributed to his efforts. He also worked for emancipation, leading the attack on the Test and Corporation acts, which were repealed in 1828, as well as towards legislation limiting working hours in factories in the 1847 Factory Act, and the Public Health Act of 1848.
His government's approach to dealing with the Great Irish Famine is now widely condemned as counterproductive, ill-informed and disastrous. Russell himself was sympathetic to the plight of the Irish poor, and many of his relief proposals were blocked by his cabinet or by the British Parliament.[55]
Queen Victoria's attitude toward Russell had been coloured by his role in the Aberdeen administration. On visiting Windsor Castle to resign, Aberdeen had told the Queen: "Nothing could have been better," he said, "than the feeling of the members towards each other. Had it not been for the incessant attempts of Lord John Russell to keep up party differences, it must be acknowledged that the experiment of a coalition had succeeded admirably," which attitude she shared.[56] The Queen continued to criticise Russell for his behaviour for the rest of his life, and on his death in 1878 her journal records that he was "a man of much talent, who leaves a name behind him, kind, & good, with a great knowledge of the constitution, who behaved very well, on many trying occasions; but he was impulsive, very selfish (as shown on many occasions, especially during Ld Aberdeen's administration) vain, & often reckless & imprudent."
A public house in Bloomsbury, large parts of which are still owned by the Bedford Estate, is named after Russell, located on Marchmont Street.
Literature
In 1819 Lord John Russell published his book Life of Lord Russell about his famous ancestor, William Russell, Lord Russell;[57] and a year later his Essays and Sketches of Life and Character, "By a Gentleman who has left his lodgings" (1820), a series of social and cultural commentaries ostensibly found in a missing lodger's rooms.[58]
In 1822 Russell published a historical drama Don Carlos: or, Persecution. A tragedy, in five acts.
Between 1853 and 1856, he edited the Memoirs, journal, and correspondence of his friend Thomas Moore, in eight volumes.
Between 1853 and 1857 Russell edited the four volume Memorials and correspondence of Charles James Fox which he followed up by writing a three volume biography The life and times of Charles James Fox, published between 1859 and 1866.
A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens was dedicated to Lord John Russell, "In remembrance of many public services and private kindnesses."[59] In speech given in 1869, Dickens remarked of Russell that "there is no man in England whom I respect more in his public capacity, whom I love more in his private capacity."[60]
Ancestry
See also
References
Notes
- Other sources use the nickname "Finality John": The Nuttall Encyclopædia. 1907. . New International Encyclopedia. 1905. .
Citations
- Cannon & Crowcroft 2015, p. 827.
- Taylor 1976, p. 67.
- Reid 1895, Ch.1.
- History of Parliament article by R. G. Thorne.
- Prest 1972, p. 11-13.
- Walpole 1889a, pp. 62–76.
- Walpole 1889a, pp. 74–75.
- Walpole 1889a, pp. 69-70.
- "Committee of Supply (1815)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 5 June 1815.
- "Tithes Ireland (1834)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 6 May 1834.
- Walpole 1889a, pp. 208-209.
- "Church of Ireland Adjourned Debate (1834)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 2 June 1834.
- Walpole 1889a, pp. 217-218.
- Hawkins 2007, p. 152.
- "The Dorchester Labourer (1835)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 25 June 1835.
- "The Dorchester Labourer (1835)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 25 June 1835.
- "Registration of Births C Dissenters (1836)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 12 February 1836.
- "Criminal Law (1837)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 23 March 1837.
- "Capital Punishments (1837)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 19 May 1837.
- The Times (27 November 1845), p. 5.
- Walpole 1889a, pp. 410-416.
- Walpole 1889a, p. 422.
- Walpole 1889a, pp. 423-424.
- Walpole 1889a, pp. 454-455.
- Elizabeth Free & Theodore M. Brown, "The Public Health Act of 1848." Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 83(11) (November 2005)
- Ross 2002, p. 226.
- Lyons 1973, pp. 30–34.
- Taylor 1976, pp. 77-78.
- Walpole 1889b, pp. 1-10.
- Walpole 1889b, pp. 13-25.
- Chambers 2004, p. 313.
- Walpole 1889b, pp. 56-60.
- Walpole 1889b, pp. 61-62.
- Chambers 2004, pp. 323–4.
- G. H. L. Le May, "The Ministerial Crisis of 1851." History Today (June 1951) , Vol. 1 Issue 6, p52-58
- Walpole 1889b, p. 143.
- Prest 2009.
- Martin 1923, pp. 107–112.
- Vincent 1981, pp. 37–49.
- Arnold 2002, p. 121.
- Trevelyan 1909, p. 120-123.
- Reid 1895, Ch. 14.
- "No. 22534". The London Gazette. 30 July 1861. p. 3193.
- Lord John Russell, Hansard search.
- Nikol 1974, pp. 341–357.
- Ellens 1987, pp. 232–249.
- Chadwick 1966, pp. 129, 146, 479.
- Scherer 1999, pp. 80–82.
- Reid 1895.
- Scherer 1999, p. 135.
- Fletcher Jones, Pamela (1972). Richmond Park: Portrait of a Royal Playground. Phillimore & Co Ltd. p. 41. ISBN 0-8503-3497-7.
- Clark 2011, Ch. 1.
- "Question Observation (1878)". House of Commons. Historic Hansard. 31 May 1878.
- Quoted in Kenney 1965, pp. 281–285
- Scherer 1999, p. 158.
- Queen Victoria's Journals, Tuesday 30th January 1855, Windsor Castle, Princess Beatrice's copies, Volume:39 (1 January 1855 – 30 June 1855), pp. 47–48, Online from the Bodleian Library
- Russell 1820.
- Russell 1820b.
- Dickens 1866, p. iii.
- Dickens 1906, p. 290.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 81–2.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 83–4.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, p. 81; she was the daughter and heiress of John Howland of Streatham, Surrey, and his wife, Elizabeth Child, daughter of Sir Josiah Child, Baronet.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, pp. 84–5.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, p. 83.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, p. 83; she was a daughter of Evelyn Pierrepont, Duke of Kingston.
- Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 6, 1895, p. 450.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 1910, p. 91.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1912, p. 84.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 1910, p. 93; she was the daughter and heiress of Adam van der Duyn, Lord of St. Gravenmoer (in Holland).
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 4, 1916, p. 219.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 1910, p. 94.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, 1910, p. 94; she was the dowager Baroness Belayse and a daughter of Francis Brudenell, Lord Brudenell.
- Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 410.
- Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 411.
- Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 410; daughter of James Master, of East Langdon, Kent, and his wife, Joice, daughter of Christopher Turner, of Milton Erneys, Bedfordshire.
- Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 411; son of Sir Peter Daniel of Clapham, Surrey; also commonly spelt "Lionel"; a portrait of him hung in Yotes Court (see J. P. Neale and T. Moule, Views of the Seats or Noblemen and Gentlemen, vol. 4, 1828 [no page numbers]).
- E. Hasted, The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent, vol. 5, 1797, p. 84; "Mr. James Master resided here [Yokes Place], where he died in 1689 [...] he left three sons and two daughters [...] The daughters were [...] and Martha, who married Lionel Daniel, esq., of Surry [sic], by whom she had William, his heir, and a daughter Elizabeth, married to George, late lord viscount Torrington".
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, p. 422.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, p. 422; daughter of John Cecil, fifth Earl of Exeter.
- Cokayne, Complete Peerage, 1st ed., vol. 7, 1896, p. 411; Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, p. 422; of Caledon and Kinard, county Tyrone.
- Cokayne and Gibbs, Complete Peerage, 2nd ed., vol. 3, p. 422; daughter of Most Rev. Anthony Dopping, Bishop of Meath.
Sources
- Bates, William (1883). Daniel Maclise (1 ed.). London: Chatto and Windus. pp. 69–72 – via Wikisource. . . Illustrated by
- Arnold, Guy (2002). Historical Dictionary of the Crimean War. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6613-3.
- Cannon, John; Crowcroft, Robert (2015). The Oxford Companion to British History (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-967783-2.
- Chadwick, Owen (1966). The Victorian Church. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Chamberlain, Muriel E. (1983). Lord Aberdeen: A Political Biography. London.*Chambers, James (2004). Palmerston, "The People's Darling". John Murray. ISBN 978-0-7195-5452-0.
- Clark, Ronald (2011). The Life of Bertrand Russell. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-4482-0215-7.
- Dickens, Charles (1906). The Speeches of Charles Dickens, 1841–1870. Chatto & Windus.
- Dickens, Charles (1866). A tale of two cities. Chapman & Hall.
- Ellens, J. P. (1987). "Lord John Russell and the Church Rate Conflict: The Struggle for a Broad Church, 1834–1868". Journal of British Studies. 26 (2): 232–257. doi:10.1086/385887. ISSN 0021-9371. JSTOR 175503.
- Halevy, Elie (1950). "The Triumph of Reform 1830–1841". History of the English People in the Nineteenth Century. 3. detailed political narrative
- Halevy, Elie (1951). "Victorian Years". History of the English People in the Nineteenth Century. 4. detailed political narrative
- Hawkins, Angus (2007). The forgotten Prime Minister – the 14th Earl of Derby. Volume I (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-920440-3.
- Henderson, G. B. (2011). "IV. The Eclipse of Lord John Russell". Cambridge Historical Journal. 5 (1): 60–86. doi:10.1017/S1474691300001220. ISSN 1474-6913. JSTOR 3020833.
- Kenney, Blair G. (1965). "Trollope's Ideal Statesmen: Plantagenet Palliser and Lord John Russell". Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 20 (3): 281–285. doi:10.2307/2932760. ISSN 0029-0564. JSTOR 2932760.
- Krein, David F. (1976). "War And Reform: Russell, Palmerston and the Struggle for Power in the Aberdeen Cabinet, 1853–54". Maryland Historian. 7#2.
- Martin, B. K. (1923). "5. The Resignation of Lord Palmerston in 1853. Extracts from unpublished letters of Queen Victoria and Lord Aberdeen". Cambridge Historical Journal. 1 (1): 107–112. doi:10.1017/S147469130000086X. ISSN 1474-6913. JSTOR 3020826.
- Nikol, John (1974). "The Oxford Movement in Decline: Lord John Russell and the Tractarians, 1846–1852". Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church. 43 (4): 341–357.
- Partridge, M.S. (1987). "The Russell Cabinet and National Defence, 1846–1852". History. 72 (235): 231–250. doi:10.1111/j.1468-229X.1987.tb01463.x. ISSN 0018-2648. JSTOR 24416414.
- Prest, John M. (1972). Lord John Russell. University of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-87249-269-1.
- Prest, John. "The Decline of Lord John Russell." History Today (June 1972) 22#6 pp 394–401, online; covers 1835 to 1852.
- Prest, John (21 May 2009). "Russell, John, first Earl Russell (1792–1878)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/24325.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- Prest, J. M. (1966). "Gladstone and Russell". Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 16: 43–63. doi:10.2307/3678794. JSTOR 3678794.
- Reid, Stuart Johnson (1895). Lord John Russell. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.
- Russell, John (1820). The Life of William Lord Russell;: With Some Account of the Times in which He Lived. Volume I (3rd ed.). Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, ... and James Ridgway. and Volume II
- Russell, John (1820b). Essays, and Sketches of Life and Character. Clayton & Kingsland and C.S. Van Winkle.
- Saunders, Robert (2005). "Lord John Russell and Parliamentary Reform, 1848–67". English Historical Review. 120 (489): 1289–1315. doi:10.1093/ehr/cei332. JSTOR 3491041.
- Scherer, Paul (1999). Lord John Russell: A Biography. Susquehanna University Press. ISBN 978-1-57591-021-5.
- Scherer, Paul H. (1987). "Partner or Puppet? Lord John Russell at the Foreign Office, 1859–1862". Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies. 19 (3): 347–371. doi:10.2307/4050465. JSTOR 4050465.
- Taylor, A.J.P. (1976). Essays in English History. Penguin. ISBN 9780140218626.
- Trevelyan, George Macaulay (1909). Garibaldi and the Thousand. Longmans.
- Wyatt, Tilby A. (1931). Lord John Russell: A study in civil and religious liberty. London.
- Vincent, J. R. (1981). "The Parliamentary Dimension of the Crimean War". Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 31: 37–49. doi:10.2307/3679044. ISSN 0080-4401. JSTOR 3679044.
- Walpole, Spencer (1889a). The Life of Lord John Russell. Volume I. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
- Walpole, Spencer (1889b). The Life of Lord John Russell. Volume II. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
- Woodward, Llewellyn (1962). The Age of Reform, 1815–1870. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-821711-4.
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Wood, James, ed. (1907). "Russell, John, Earl". The Nuttall Encyclopædia. London and New York: Frederick Warne.
Historiography
- Beales, Derek (1974). "Peel, Russell and Reform". Historical Journal. 17#4 (4): 873–882. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00007950. JSTOR 2638561.
- Loades, David Michael (2003). Reader's guide to British history.
External links
Wikisource has original works written by or about: John Russell, 1st Earl Russell |
Wikiquote has quotations related to: John Russell, 1st Earl Russell |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to John Russell, 1st Earl Russell. |
- Works by John Russell, 1st Earl Russell at Project Gutenberg
- Lord John Russell 1st Earl Russell, short biography from the 10 Downing Street website
- Hansard 1803–2005: contributions in Parliament by Lord John Russell
- Lord John Russell 1792–1878 biography from the Liberal Democrat History Group
- Works by or about John Russell, 1st Earl Russell at Internet Archive
- Works by John Russell, 1st Earl Russell at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- More about Earl Russell on the Downing Street website
- Pembroke Lodge (principal residence and museum)
- Portraits of John Russell, 1st Earl Russell at the National Portrait Gallery, London