Russian bounty program

The Russian bounty program is an alleged project of Russian military intelligence to pay bounties to Taliban-linked militants for killing American and other allied service members in Afghanistan.

In June 2020, The Washington Post reported that intelligence suggesting the existence of a bounty operation dated to as early as 2018.[1] The Washington Post and Associated Press both reported that Trump administration White House officials were informed of the intelligence reports in early 2019.[2] In June 2020, The New York Times reported that U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed, several months earlier, that Unit 29155 of the Russian military intelligence agency GRU had secretly offered Taliban-associated militants bounties to kill U.S. troops and other coalition personnel in Afghanistan, including during peace talks with the Taliban.[3] The New York Times reported that "Officials said there was disagreement among intelligence officials about the strength of the evidence about the suspected Russian plot."[4] In June 2020, Defense Secretary Mark Esper testified before the House Armed Services Committee that military intelligence agencies were unable to corroborate the reported program; at the same meeting, General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff stated that, while no link of such a program to U.S. casualties had been found, investigations were continuing.[5]

China and Iran were also accused of offering bounties for American soldiers later in 2020.[6][7] Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting criticized the handling of these stories by the media noting the reliance on anonymous sources in the state intelligence agencies.[8]

Background
Main articles: War in Afghanistan (2001–present) and Russia–United States relations
Military situation, as of 2019
  Under control of the Afghan government and NATO
  Under control of the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and Allies

In 2010, Iran reportedly paid Taliban fighters $1,000 for each U.S. soldier they kill in Afghanistan (equivalent to $1,170 in 2019).[9] U.S. and British officials have accused Iran of giving support and weapons to the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan.[10][11] In August 2019, The Washington Post reported that Iran's "relationship with the Taliban now spans the economic, security and political realms and is likely to grow as the Taliban asserts itself again."[12] Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have been also accused of supporting Taliban.[13][14][15]

Russia initially supported the United States' War on Terror and agreed to provide logistic support for the United States forces in Afghanistan. In May 2015, Russia closed a key military transport corridor which allowed NATO to deliver military supplies to Afghanistan through the Russian territory.[16] Intelligence reports that Russia supplies arms to the Taliban have persisted for several years with contact in Northern Afghanistan beginning around 2015.[17] Security officials from the United States and Afghanistan have previously determined that Russia provides financial support and arms to the Taliban and its leaders.[18][3] Russian government officials have called the accusations baseless.[3] Carter Malkasian, a former adviser to U.S. military commanders in Afghanistan, said that Russia began cultivating relationships with "certain Taliban elements" in northern Afghanistan around 2015, ostensibly as a response to Islamic State activity.[17] According to the BBC, Russia "is deeply concerned about the rise of Islamist fundamentalism in the region spreading in its direction. And it sees the Taliban as one potential bulwark against this."[19] In February and again in May 2019, a delegation of Taliban officials and senior Afghan politicians met in Moscow to hold a new round of Afghan peace talks.[20][21] Reuters reported that "Russian officials as well as religious leaders and elders had asked for a ceasefire."[22]

Unit 29155 is a covert unit of the GRU tasked with foreign assassinations and other covert activities. The unit has been linked to the 2016 Montenegrin coup plot, the poisoning of Bulgarian arms manufacturer Emilian Gebrev, and the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal.[23]

In 2019, 23 American service members were killed during operations in Afghanistan.[24] Ten U.S. service members died from gunfire or improvised explosive devices in 2018 and 16 in 2019. Another two were killed in 2020 prior to the February ceasefire and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Several of the soldiers were killed in green-on-blue attacks (attacks by members of Afghan security forces against coalition forces).[17] In December 2019, the Afghanistan Papers revealed that high-ranking military and government officials were generally of the opinion that the war in Afghanistan was unwinnable, but kept this hidden from the public.[25][26]

According to the lawsuit, filed in December 2019 in the D.C. District Court on behalf of Gold Star families, major U.S. and international defense contractors involved in Afghanistan made illegal "protection payments" to the Taliban, funding a "Taliban-led terrorist insurgency" that killed or wounded thousands of Americans in Afghanistan.[27][28] A related lawsuit accused the Iranian government.[28] In 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that the "protection money" was "one of the major sources of funding for the Taliban."[29]

On February 29, 2020, the Trump administration signed a conditional peace agreement with the Taliban,[30] which calls for the withdrawal of foreign troops in 14 months if the Taliban uphold the terms of the agreement.[31] In May 2020, President Trump said "it is time" to bring U.S. soldiers home from Afghanistan.[32]

Intelligence gathering and assessment

Trump White House officials were first informed in early 2019 of intelligence reports regarding a Russian bounty program.[1][2]

In 2019 and 2020, interrogations of criminals and captured Islamist militants by Afghanistan's government[33][18][17] led to reports by Afghanistan-based U.S. Special Operations and intelligence officers that militants had been paid bounties in 2019 for their targeting of military personnel from the United States.[17][18] The accounts from Taliban militants "from opposite ends of the country and from separate tribes" were similar.[2] Early on, intelligence agencies and analysts disagreed over the reliability of findings based on interrogations of the detainees. Intercepted electronic data showed large bank transfers to a Taliban-linked account from an account controlled by the GRU. Afghan officials said that several businessmen who transferred money through the hawala system were suspected of being intermediaries for the bounty program and were arrested in raids.[34] Around January 2020, a joint operation between US forces and the Afghan National Directorate of Security raided a Taliban outpost in Kunduz. Thirteen people were arrested. One fled to Tajikistan while another, an Afghan drug lord Rahmatullah Azizi, was thought to have escaped to Russia. Security forces recovered around US$500,000 from Azizi's house in Kabul.[35][34] According to the NY Times, US intelligence reports identified Azizi as a key middleman, collecting multiple cash payments of hundreds of thousands of dollars from Russia and distributing them to Taliban-linked militants.[35] The raid heightened U.S. intelligence suspicion of a Russian financial link to the Taliban and related networks.[2]

Information on the bounty program was circulated in intelligence reports and two officials said that program was known by the region's CIA Station Chief as well as military forces tasked with engaging the Taliban.[18] The CIA produced an intelligence assessment, reviewing and confirming the findings.[17] The assessment concluded that Russian military operatives had covertly offered rewards for successful attacks on coalition forces in 2019.[36] Rewards from the bounty program were thought to have been collected by Islamist militants or their criminal associates.[3] Military officials also reviewed past combat casualties to determine whether any of the deaths could be attributed to the bounty program.[18] Investigators focused on two attacks on US service personnel, one of which was a bombing outside Bagram Airfield in April 2019 that killed Marines Robert A. Hendriks, Benjamin S. Hines, and Christopher Slutman.[34] Officials did not describe how military targets were selected or the exact manner by which militants were paid.[3] The unnamed Afghan officials claimed the bounty program offered up to $100,000 for each American or coalition soldier killed.[35]

The intelligence community's assessment led to an interagency meeting of the National Security Council (NSC) at the White House in late March 2020.[17][18] Government officials said the highest levels of the White House had been briefed on the bounty program[18] and that the program had been included in the President's Daily Brief in late February.[34] A range of responses to Russia were discussed at the meeting, including registering a diplomatic complaint and a series of sanctions.[17][3] While U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad advocated for directly confronting Russia, officials with the NSC were "more dismissive of taking immediate action".[17] In the months that followed, officials said the bounty program had been "treated as a closely held secret". During the last week of June, expanded briefings were held[3] and the British government was briefed. They were the only coalition member to be formally informed about the intelligence.[17]

The National Security Agency (NSA) has "strongly dissented" from the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency assessments that the bounty plot is credible and real.[37]

On June 29, 2020, the Department of Defense (DOD) stated that it "continues to evaluate intelligence that Russian GRU operatives were engaged in malign activity against the United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan. To date, DOD has no corroborating evidence to validate the recent allegations found in open-source reports."[38]

The existence of a Russian bounty program would mark an escalation of the ongoing Second Cold War and the first time GRU is known to have orchestrated attacks on Western military personnel.[3] The White House has yet to authorize any response to Russia.[3]

According to the New York Times, on 1 July, the National Intelligence Council, which reports to the director of national intelligence, John Ratcliffe, produced a two-and-a-half page document in which various intelligence agencies assessed the credibility of the existence of a bounty program based on the available evidence. Anonymous officials who had seen the memo said that the "C.I.A. and the National Counterterrorism Center had assessed with medium confidence—meaning credibly sourced and plausible, but falling short of near certainty"—that the GRU had offered bounties. Other parts of the intelligence community, including the National Security Agency, said they "did not have information to support that conclusion at the same level", and so had lower confidence in the conclusion.[39]

Reporting

Citing credible unnamed sources, on June 26, 2020, The New York Times reported on a Russian military program to pay bounties to Taliban-linked militants for killing American soldiers in Afghanistan.[17] Two days later, The Washington Post reported that the bounty program had resulted in the death of at least one U.S. soldier.[18] The Washington Post reported that "Several people familiar with the matter said it was unclear exactly how many Americans or coalition troops from other countries may have been killed or targeted under the program" and that the intelligence, obtained from U.S. military interrogatives of captured Taliban-linked militants, had been "passed up from the U.S. Special Operations forces based in Afghanistan and led to a restricted high-level White House meeting" in late March 2020.[17] The Times reported that American investigators had identified at least one attack they suspected of being thus incentivized: a car bombing on April 8, 2019 outside of Bagram Airfield which killed three Marines and wounded three more, as well as injuring at least six Afghani citizens.[4] On July 9, 2020, Defense Secretary Mark Esper said that Marine Gen. Kenneth McKenzie Jr. and DOD intelligence agencies have not found a link between alleged Russian bounties and that specific attack.[5]

Reactions

Afghanistan reactions

Afghan President Ashraf Ghani said that the country cannot be the venue for "big power plays" between world leaders, noting that this brought tragedy to the country in the 19th century and the late 20th century.[40]

Russia reactions

Russia has denied that the bounty program exists,[17] issuing denials through Putin's spokesperson Dmitry Peskov,[41] Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev,[42] Russia's envoy to Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov,[41] and Russian lawmaker Frants Klintsevich, a member of Federation Council's defense and security committee.[43] Russian diplomats accused the New York Times of spreading fake news and said that the story led to threats against Russian diplomats.[44] The Russian Foreign Ministry said the story demonstrated the "low intellectual abilities of U.S. intelligence propagandists."[43]

Some Russian experts said that "U.S. intelligence about Russia has become completely detached from reality" and that the reports about bounties "serves only to fuel ... a political civil war between President Donald Trump and his opponents in Washington"; Andrei Kortunovru, director of the Russian International Affairs Council, which is affiliated with the Foreign Ministry, said that making payments to the Taliban would harm Russia's interests by hastening a U.S. retreat from the region and increasing the threat of extreme Islamist forces coming to power in Afghanistan, creating instability and insurrection in the former Soviet states of central Asia.[45] However, according to interviews with Afghan officials, U.S. officials, and foreign diplomats who have served in Kabul, the Taliban, Russia and Iran, although historic adversaries, had a shared strategic interest in U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, with the Russians viewing the U.S. presence in central Asia as a strategic threat.[46] U.S. intelligence officials said Russia began building a diplomatic channel to the Taliban around 2012.[46] When Russia realised that the US intended leaving Afghanistan, it began working to help the moderate, nationalist factions of the Taliban prevail over the more radical wings. It aimed to move the peace process in a moderate direction through indirect links with the Taliban and, according to Russian experts, may also have "forged more confidential links".[45]

Taliban reactions

The Taliban has denied that the bounty program exists.[17] Taliban spokesperson Zabiullah Mujahid denied any relations to intelligence agencies, saying "our target killings and assassinations were ongoing in years before, and we did it on our own resources".[3]

United States reactions

President Donald Trump and his aides said that he had not been briefed on the intelligence. Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe and White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said that Trump had not received a briefing on the bounty program. Trump called the bounty program "Fake News" and a hoax.[17][47] Later the same day, Trump responded via Twitter that US intelligence advised him that it had not reported the matter to him or Mike Pence as it did not find the information credible.[48][49] The New York Times said that "in denying that Mr. Trump was briefed, administration officials have been coy about how it is defining that concept and whether it includes both oral briefings and the President's Daily Brief."[4] Two officials familiar with the matter said that Trump had received a written briefing in the President's Daily Brief on the Russian bounty intelligence in late February; McEnany said that Trump "was not personally briefed on the matter."[4] Trump reportedly often does not read the President's Daily Brief, instead receiving a periodic oral briefing.[4] Current and former intelligence officials said that even during in-person meetings, Trump "is particularly difficult to brief on national security matters" and "often relies instead on conservative media and friends for information."[4]

National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien said that Trump's "career CIA briefer decided not to brief him because it was unverified intelligence" and noted that the U.S. receives many pieces of intelligence each week.[50] McEnany said that "There is no consensus within the intelligence community on these allegations and in effect there are dissenting opinions from some in the intelligence community with regards to the veracity of what's being reported."[48] NSC spokesperson John Ullyot said "the veracity of the underlying allegations continues to be evaluated."[17] However, the New York Times, citing two officials, reported on June 29 that "a description of the intelligence assessment that the Russian unit had carried out the bounties plot was also seen as serious and solid enough to disseminate more broadly across the intelligence community in a May 4 article in the C.I.A.'s World Intelligence Review."[4] Democratic Congresswoman Elissa Slotkin of Michigan—a former CIA analyst, National Security Council staff member, and intelligence briefer—said that in her experience in the George W. Bush and Obama White Houses, a piece of intelligence such as reported Russian bounties on U.S. troops would be considered sufficiently important to be shared with the president even if there were conflicting views among U.S. intelligence.[51] Slotkin said it would be "deeply concerning" if senior staff failed to take such information to Trump despite his five recent phone calls with Putin.[51] Robert Cardillo, a former senior U.S. intelligence official, and David Priess, a former CIA daily intelligence briefer and an author of a book on presidential intelligence briefings, both said that in previous administrations, presidents "received assessments on issues of potentially vital importance even if they had dissents from some analysts or agencies," and that such dissents were also raised to presidents "to help them understand uncertainties and the analytic process."[4] Priess noted that uncertainties were inherent to the nature of intelligence.[4]

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi criticized Trump, saying: "This is as bad as it gets, and yet the president will not confront the Russians on this score, denies being briefed."[17] Pelosi referred to Trump's proposals to bring Russia back into the G8, from which Russia was expelled following the annexation of Crimea on March 24, 2014.[17] Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called for all members of Congress to be briefed on the matter.[4][52] The White House gave briefings on its position on June 29 to a group of eight House Republicans allied to the administration.[53][4][54][55] Former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, criticized Trump for failing "to sanction or impose any kind of consequences on Russia for this egregious violation of international law" and said the Trump has "continued his embarrassing campaign of deference and debasing himself before Vladimir Putin."[56] Biden promised if he is elected, "Putin will be confronted and we’ll impose serious costs on Russia."[57] Among congressional Republicans, Senator Lindsey Graham and Representatives Liz Cheney and Dan Crenshaw expressed outrage at the news and asked for an explanation,[18][17] while Representative Adam Kinzinger called on Trump to stop the alleged "shadow war" Russia is waging.[18] Other congressional Republicans defended Trump,[53] including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.[55] Richard Grenell, who was acting Director of National Intelligence up until May 2020, said that he had not been made aware of the bounty program.[17] Former Deputy Secretary of Defense for the Middle East Michael Mulroy told ABC News that although the U.S. did not want a war with Russia, there were some actions the U.S. could not accept: "if we have solid evidence that this is being done and our forces are being killed the gloves should be hitting the floor."[58]

David B. Rivkin wrote that "this kind of scalp-hunting would be an unprecedented escalatory act. Even at the height of the Cold War, both the Soviet Union and the United States refrained from such activity, despite engaging enthusiastically in proxy warfare in theaters around the world."[33]

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell indicated that news-media overreacted, saying "What I know is that our military commanders on the ground did not think that it was as serious a problem as the newspapers were reporting".[59][60]

White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said that people would "go to jail" over the reports that allege Russia offered bounties to Taliban fighters. Meadows said "We know a crime was perpetrated... Whoever leaked this – they didn't even leak the whole story... We're determined to get to the bottom of it, we don't have any intelligence that would support the reporting." Rudy Giuliani, a member of Trump's legal team, called the leaker a "deep state criminal who committed a serious crime... I can't think of a worse crime. It's not quite treason but comes close."[61]

On July 1, 2020, the House Armed Services Committee overwhelmingly voted in favor of an amendment to restrict President Trump's ability to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan.[62] Rep. Seth Moulton stated: "Now we learned that [Trump] was making [peace deal with the Taliban] at the same time as there were bounties on the heads of American troops, American sons and daughters. We clearly need more oversight over what the president is doing in Afghanistan."[63]

A Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll conducted on July 6–7 showed that 60% of Americans said they found Russian bounty program to be "very" or "somewhat" believable. 54% of those polled wanted to impose more sanctions on Russia, while 9% supported military attacks on the Russian Armed Forces, 29% did not know, and "9% wanted to move on and try to improve relations with Russia".[64]

In testimony to the House Armed Services Committee on July 9, 2020, General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Defense Secretary Mark Esper said that reports on the Russian bounty program had not been corroborated by military intelligence agencies: Esper said that "All the defense intelligence agencies have been unable to corroborate that report" while "As of today, right now, we don't have cause and effect linkages to a Russian bounty program causing U.S. Military casualties."[5] Milley testified that, [5] Milley testified that the U.S. was still investigating and would "take action" if the bounty program is proven to be true.[5] Esper said that General Kenneth McKenzie, the commander of U.S. Central Command, and General Scott Miller, the top U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, did not think "the reports were credible as they dug into them."[5] McKenzie said that he found no "causative link" between reported bounties to actual U.S. military deaths, but said the reports were "very worrisome" and said a lack of proof is "often true in battlefield intelligence."[5] In September 2020, McKenzie said that the existence of a Russian bounty "has not been proved to a level of certainty that satisfies me" but that the military continued to seek evidence and considered the matter "not a closed issue."[65]

United Kingdom reactions

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson was briefed on the bounty program. He has not released the parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee's report on Russian interference in British politics.[23] Tobias Ellwood, the chair of the House of Commons Commons Defence Select Committee, sought to raise an urgent question in the House of Commons on the matter, to obtain an explanation from a government minister.[66]

See also

References
  1. DeYoung, Karen; Harris, Shane; Nakashima, Ellen; Demirjian, Karoun (June 30, 2020). "Intelligence reports on Russian bounty operation first reached White House in early 2019". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  2. LaPorta, James (June 30, 2020). "AP sources: White House aware of Russian bounties in 2019". Associated Press.
  3. Savage, Charlie; Schmitt, Eric; Schwirtz, Michael (June 26, 2020). "Russia Secretly Offered Afghan Militants Bounties to Kill U.S. Troops, Intelligence Says". The New York Times.
  4. Savage, Charlie; Schmitt, Eric; Fandos, Nicholas; Goldman, Adam (June 29, 2020). "Trump Got Written Briefing in February on Possible Russian Bounties, Officials Say". The New York Times. Retrieved June 30, 2020.
  5. Martinez, Luis (July 10, 2020). "Top Pentagon officials say Russian bounty program not corroborated". ABC News.
  6. "US intelligence indicates Iran paid bounties to Taliban for targeting American troops in Afghanistan". CNN. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
  7. "Trump Was Briefed on Uncorroborated Intelligence About Chinese Bounties". The New York Times. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
  8. "Media Cry Wolf for Third Time on Afghan 'Bounties'". Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
  9. "Report: Iran pays $1,000 for each U.S. soldier killed by the Taliban". NBC News. May 9, 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2020.
  10. Townsend, Mark (June 22, 2008). "Special forces find proof of Iran supplying Taliban with equipment to fight British". The Observer.
  11. Maler, Sandra (November 23, 2010). "Iran still supporting Afghan insurgency-U.S." Reuters. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  12. Tabatabai, Ariane M. (August 9, 2019). "Iran's cooperation with the Taliban could affect talks on U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan". The Washington Post.
  13. "Saudis Bankroll Taliban, Even as King Officially Supports Afghan Government". The New York Times. June 12, 2016.
  14. Shams, Shamil (March 4, 2020). "US-Taliban deal: How Pakistan's 'Islamist support' finally paid off". Deutsche Welle.
  15. Jamal, Umair (May 23, 2020). "Understanding Pakistan's Take on India-Taliban Talks". The Diplomat.
  16. Sands, David R. (May 19, 2015). "Russia closes NATO supply corridor to Afghanistan". The Washington Times.
  17. Nakashima, Ellen; DeYoung, Karen; Ryan, Missy; Hudson, John (June 28, 2020). "Russian bounties to Taliban-linked militants resulted in deaths of U.S. troops, according to intelligence assessments". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  18. Schmitt, Eric; Goldman, Adam; Fandos, Nicholas (June 28, 2020). "Spies and Commandos Warned Months Ago of Russian Bounties on U.S. Troops". The New York Times.
  19. Marcus, Jonathan (June 29, 2020). "What's going on between Russia, US and Afghanistan?". BBC News.
  20. Higgins, Andrew; Mashal, Mujib (February 6, 2019). "Taliban Peace Talks in Moscow End With Hope the U.S. Exits, if Not Too Quickly". The New York Times.
  21. "Taliban says progress made at Afghan talks in Moscow". Al Jazeera. May 30, 2019.
  22. Rodionov, Maxim (May 30, 2019). "Taliban say progress made at Afghan talks in Moscow but no breakthrough". Reuters.
  23. Doward, Jamie (June 27, 2020). "Russia offered bounty to kill UK soldiers". The Observer. London. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  24. LeBlanc, Paul (June 28, 2020). "Washington Post: Russian bounties to Taliban fighters believed to result in deaths of US troops, intelligence assessments show". CNN. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  25. Whitlock, Craig (December 9, 2019). "Confidential documents reveal U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan". Washington Post.
  26. Pickrell, Ryan (December 9, 2019). "Top US officials knew the Afghanistan war was unwinnable and 'lied' — even as costs rose to $1 trillion and 2,351 American troop's lives". Business Insider.
  27. Breuninger, Kevin; Hirsch, Lauren (December 27, 2019). "US contractors sued for allegedly paying 'protection money' to the Taliban in Afghanistan". CNBC.
  28. Schwartz, Matthew S. (December 28, 2019). "Gold Star Families Sue Defense Contractors, Alleging They Funded The Taliban". NPR.
  29. Shortell, David (December 28, 2019). "Gold Star family lawsuit alleges contractors in Afghanistan funneled money to the Taliban". CNN. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  30. Rai, Manish (March 21, 2020). "U.S.-Taliban Deal: India should Chalk-out a New Strategy". OpedColumn.News.Blog. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  31. George, Susannah (February 29, 2020). "U.S. signs peace deal with Taliban agreeing to full withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan". The Washington Post.
  32. McLaughlin, Elizabeth; Martinez, Luis; Finnegan, Conor (May 27, 2020). "Trump says 'it is time' for US troops to exit Afghanistan, undermining agreement with Taliban". ABC News.
  33. Rivkin, David B., Jr.; Beebe, George S. (July 5, 2020). "Opinion: Why we need a little skepticism, and more evidence, on Russian bounties". The Hill.
  34. Savage, Charlie; Mashal, Mujib; Callimachi, Rukmini; Schmitt, Eric; Goldman, Adam (June 30, 2020). "Suspicions of Russian Bounties Were Bolstered by Data on Financial Transfers". The New York Times.
  35. Mashal, Mujib; Schmitt, Eric; Rahim, Najim; Callimachi, Rukmini (July 1, 2020). "Afghan Contractor Handed Out Russian Cash to Kill Americans, Officials Say". The New York Times.
  36. "Outrage mounts over report Russia offered bounties to Afghanistan militants for killing US soldiers". The Guardian. June 27, 2020. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  37. Lubold, Gordon; Strobel, Warren P. (June 30, 2020). "NSA Differed From CIA, Others on Russia Bounty Intelligence". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  38. Pitofsky, Marina (June 30, 2020). "Pentagon: 'No corroborating evidence' yet to validate troop bounty allegations". The Hill.
  39. Savage, Charlie; Schmitt, Eric; Callimachi, Rukmini; Goldman, Adam (July 3, 2020). "New Administration Memo Seeks to Foster Doubts About Suspected Russian Bounties". The New York Times. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  40. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/revelations-of-russian-bounties-in-afghanistan-escalates-us-russia-feud/
  41. Cole, Brendan (July 1, 2020). "How Russia Reacted to the U.S. Troop Bounty Claims". Newsweek.
  42. Brennan, David (July 7, 2020). "Russia Official Blames U.S. For Taliban, Rejects Reports of Moscow Support". Newsweek. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  43. Kim, Lucian (July 8, 2020). "Russia Denies Allegations It Paid Militants To Kill U.S. Troops As 'Nonsense'". NPR.
  44. "False US reports about Russia in Afghanistan led to threats against diplomats — embassy". TASS. June 27, 2020.
  45. Weir, Fred (July 9, 2020). "For Russian experts, Taliban bounty report just doesn't make sense". Christian Science Monitor. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved July 14, 2020.
  46. Mashal, Mujib; Schwirtz, Michael (July 13, 2020). "How Russia Built a Channel to the Taliban, Once an Enemy". The New York Times.
  47. Bowder, John (June 28, 2020). "Intelligence suggests Russian bounties led to deaths of several US troops in Afghanistan: report". The Hill. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  48. Subramanian, Courtney; Collins, Michael (June 29, 2020). "'No consensus' in intelligence community over Russia bounty on U.S. troops report, White House says". USA Today.
  49. McCarthy, Tom (June 29, 2020). "Trump: I was not told about 'Russian bounties' plot because it was not credible". The Guardian. London. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  50. Quinn, Melissa (July 2, 2020). "O'Brien says top CIA official decided against briefing Trump on Russia bounty intel". CBS News.
  51. Cochrane, Emily (July 1, 2020). "Slotkin, Former Intelligence Briefer, Presses White House on Russia Reports". The New York Times.
  52. Beavers, Olivia (June 29, 2020). "Pelosi, Schumer request US intelligence leaders brief Congress on reports of Russian bounties". The Hill.
  53. Cheney, Kyle; Sherman, Jake; Caygle, Heather (June 29, 2020). "White House briefs Republicans on Russian bounties". Politico.
  54. "Schumer Floor Remarks Demanding Answers & An All Senators Briefing On Reports Of Russian Bounties On U.S. Troops In Afghanistan". United States Senate (Press release). June 29, 2020. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  55. Kaplan, Talia (June 30, 2020). "Kevin McCarthy calls out Schumer for 'playing politics with American lives' over Russia bounty reports". Fox News. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
  56. Eric Schmitt, Michael Schwirtz & Charlie Savage (June 27, 2020). "Biden Criticizes Trump Over Intelligence on Russian Bounties on U.S. Troops". New York Times.
  57. "Biden slams Trump over reported Russian bounties placed on U.S. troops". Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. June 27, 2020.
  58. Meek, James Gordon; Thomas, Elizabeth; Martinez, Luis (June 27, 2020). "Russians offered Taliban bounties to kill US troops: Military official". ABC News.
  59. Dorman, Sam (July 9, 2020). "Colin Powell suggests media had 'hysterical' reaction to reports on Russian bounty intelligence". Fox News.
  60. Edelman, KJ (July 9, 2020). "Retired General Colin Powell Accuses Media of 'Almost Hysterical' Coverage of Russia-Taliban Bounty Program: 'It Got Kind Of Out Of Control'". Mediaite.
  61. Crisp, Elizabeth (July 3, 2020). "Top Trump Aide Vows People Will 'Go to Jail' Over Russia Bounty Leaks". Newsweek.
  62. Greenwald, Glenn (July 2, 2020). "House Democrats, Working With Liz Cheney, Restrict Trump's Planned Withdrawal of Troops From Afghanistan and Germany". The Intercept. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  63. Kheel, Rebecca (July 1, 2020). "House panel votes to constrain Afghan drawdown, ask for assessment on 'incentives' to attack US troops". The Hill.
  64. Kahn, Chris (July 8, 2020). "Most Americans believe Russia targeted U.S. soldiers, want sanctions in response, Reuters/Ipsos poll shows". Reuters.
  65. Courtney Kube & Ken Dilanian, U.S. commander: Intel still hasn't established Russia paid Taliban 'bounties' to kill U.S. troops, NBC News (September 14, 2020).
  66. Bunkall, Alistair (June 29, 2020). "Russia offered Taliban-linked fighters bounties to attack British troops - as senior Tory MP seeks answers". Sky News. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.