Branching order of bacterial phyla (Woese, 1987)

The names have been changed to reflect more current nomenclature used by molecular phylogenists.

Despite the impact of the paper on bacterial classification, it was not a proposal for change of taxonomy. Consequently, many clades were given official names. Only subsequently, this occurred: for example, the "purple bacteria and relatives" were renamed Proteobacteria.[4]

The root of the tree, i.e. the node of the last universal common ancestor, is placed between the domain Bacteria (or kingdom Eubacteria as it was then known) and the clade formed by the domains Archaea (formerly kingdom Archaebacteria) and Eukaryotes. This is consistent with all subsequent studies, bar the study by Thomas Cavalier-Smith in 2002 and 2004, which was not based on molecular phylogeny.[5]

Eukaryotes are a mosaic of different lineages:

• The genome in the nucleus descends from the first organelle-less eukaryote, the "urkaryote" a sister species to the ancestral archeon
• The mitochondria are organelles that descended from the proto-mitochondrion, a species of Rickettsiales (Alphaproteobacteria) (v. Reclinomonas and retortamonads).
• The chloroplasts are organelles of cyanobacterial origin.

Consequently, in Woese (1987) the group is referred to as urkaryote.

The clade composed of Archaea and the nuclear genome of eukaryotes is called Neomura by T. Cavalier-Smith[5]

• Branching order of bacterial phyla (Woese, 1987)
• Branching order of bacterial phyla (Rappe and Giovanoni, 2003)
• Branching order of bacterial phyla after ARB Silva Living Tree
• Branching order of bacterial phyla (Ciccarelli et al., 2006)
• Branching order of bacterial phyla (Battistuzzi et al.,2004)
• Branching order of bacterial phyla (Gupta, 2001)
• Branching order of bacterial phyla (Cavalier-Smith, 2002)
• Woeseian revolution