Condução coercitiva

Condução coercitiva [lower-alpha 1] is a Brazilian judicial mandate or summons, which provides for a compulsory method of bringing subjects of a judicial process, victims, witnesses, accused parties, or expert subjects into the presence of law enforcement or judicial authorities against their wishes. This is a measure provided for in the Penal Code of Brazil (CPP) as a means of compelling the appearance of a person to attend an action to which he was summoned, but who failed to do so without justification.[1]

Brazil
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Brazil
Executive
Legislative
Judiciary
Law
Administrative divisions
Recent elections
Foreign relations
 Brazil portal

According to some jurists, this is a form of short-term "precautionary detention" (prisão cautelar) whose purpose is to ensure the convenience of the production of proof.[2] If equated with precautionary detention, condução coercitiva is contrary to the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 Article 5, paragraph LXI, even though the procedure is in the Penal Code of Brazil, instituted in 1941.[3]

The CPP authorizes the enforcement of the condução coercitiva of victims, witnesses, defendants, and experts who refuse to appear in court, and who may even be handcuffed and brought by police vehicle. Article 218 of the CPP refers to the requirement of prior summons (Portuguese: intimação). Thus, some argue that even with the justification of providing clarification to the police investigation and even in the interests of justice, the condução coercitiva warrant without a summons violates the right to liberty of witnesses and defendants. According to this line of thinking, the only ones who can be compelled to appear by a condução coercitiva are those witnesses who were appropriately summoned beforehand and who fail to attend the act to which they were summoned, without valid cause, may be compelled to appear via a condução coercitiva warrant.

There is some controversy concerning the exact legal foundation and even constitutionality of the condução coercitiva warrant. From a legal perspective, it is not the same as an arrest warrant.[4]

See also

References
Notes
  1. There is no accepted translation or English equivalent of condução coercitiva in reliable sources. There is no exact equivalent of the concept in common law, although it is similar to a material witness subpoena. A brief, fairly literal rendering of the term might be coerced conveyance, which renders its two essential features: 1) it involves conveying a person to the authorities, and 2) it is compulsory and will be backed by police force against the wishes of the person involved if resisted.
Citations
  1. Fonseca, Daniela (November 2015). "A impossibilidade da condução coercitiva sem notificação prévia" [The impossibility of issuing a condução coercitiva warrant without prior notification]. JusBrasil. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 24 December 2019.
  2. De Souza Nucci, Guilherme (2017). Código De Processo Penal Comentado [Annotated Code of Criminal Procedure] (13th revised and expanded ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Forense. ISBN 978-85-309-7970-6. OCLC 923761680.
  3. Periera Santos, Rosemary (22 October 2015), "Condução coercitiva no processo penal: abordagem sob o prisma constitucional" [Condução coercitiva in criminal proceedings: constitutional approach], Jurisway
  4. de Moraes, Rafael Francisco Marcondes (6 December 2014). "Sob prisma jurídico, condução coercitiva não é considerada prisão" [From a legal standpoint, condução coercitiva is not considered an arrest]. Consultor Jurídico (in Portuguese). São Paulo. ISSN 1809-2829. Retrieved 26 December 2019.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.