1900 United States presidential election in Mississippi

The 1900 United States presidential election in Mississippi took place on November 6, 1900. All contemporary 45 states were part of the 1900 United States presidential election. Mississippi voters chose nine electors to the Electoral College, which selected the president and vice president.

United States presidential election in Mississippi, 1900

November 6, 1900
 
Nominee William J. Bryan William McKinley
Party Democratic Republican
Home state Nebraska Ohio
Running mate Adlai Stevenson I Theodore Roosevelt
Electoral vote 9 0
Popular vote 51,706 5,707
Percentage 87.56% 9.66%

County Results
Bryan
  60-70%
  70-80%
  80-90%
  90-100%


President before election

William McKinley
Republican

Elected President

William McKinley
Republican

Mississippi was won by the Democratic nominees, former U.S. Representative William Jennings Bryan of Nebraska and his running mate Adlai Stevenson I of Illinois.

Results

1900 United States presidential election in Mississippi[1]
Party Candidate Votes Percentage Electoral votes
Democratic William Jennings Bryan 51,706 87.56% 9
Republican William McKinley 5,707 9.66% 0
Populist Wharton Barker 1,642 2.78% 0
Totals 59,055 100.00% 9
Voter turnout

Results by county

County William Jennings Bryan
Democratic
William McKinley
Republican
Wharton Barker
Populist
Margin Total votes cast[2][lower-alpha 1]
# % # % # % # %
Adams 500 80.26% 113 18.14% 10 1.61% 387 62.12% 623
Alcorn 770 89.22% 88 10.20% 5 0.58% 682 79.03% 863
Amite 771 91.57% 27 3.21% 44 5.23% 727[lower-alpha 2] 86.34% 842
Attala 1,111 87.21% 122 9.58% 41 3.22% 989 77.63% 1,274
Benton 621 90.00% 64 9.28% 5 0.72% 557 80.72% 690
Bolivar 380 65.86% 194 33.62% 3 0.52% 186 32.24% 577
Calhoun 853 89.13% 77 8.05% 27 2.82% 776 81.09% 957
Carroll 710 83.04% 69 8.07% 76 8.89% 634[lower-alpha 2] 74.15% 855
Chickasaw 460 70.77% 52 8.00% 138 21.23% 322[lower-alpha 2] 49.54% 650
Choctaw 584 74.58% 101 12.90% 98 12.52% 483 61.69% 783
Claiborne 373 94.43% 18 4.56% 4 1.01% 355 89.87% 395
Clarke 674 96.84% 15 2.16% 7 1.01% 659 94.68% 696
Clay 668 95.02% 16 2.28% 19 2.70% 649[lower-alpha 2] 92.32% 703
Coahoma 266 76.66% 77 22.19% 4 1.15% 189 54.47% 347
Copiah 1,314 92.80% 54 3.81% 48 3.39% 1,260 88.98% 1,416
Covington 442 67.48% 208 31.76% 5 0.76% 234 35.73% 655
DeSoto 734 92.91% 51 6.46% 5 0.63% 683 86.46% 790
Franklin 397 83.58% 37 7.79% 41 8.63% 356[lower-alpha 2] 74.95% 475
Greene 136 67.00% 66 32.51% 1 0.49% 70 34.48% 203
Grenada 478 93.18% 29 5.65% 6 1.17% 449 87.52% 513
Hancock 310 80.10% 71 18.35% 6 1.55% 239 61.76% 387
Harrison 611 79.77% 150 19.58% 5 0.65% 461 60.18% 766
Hinds 1,365 92.29% 100 6.76% 14 0.95% 1,265 85.53% 1,479
Holmes 900 94.44% 39 4.09% 14 1.47% 861 90.35% 953
Issaquena 84 83.17% 17 16.83% 0 0.00% 67 66.34% 101
Itawamba 821 86.79% 110 11.63% 15 1.59% 711 75.16% 946
Jackson 425 71.19% 166 27.81% 6 1.01% 259 43.38% 597
Jasper 734 93.15% 33 4.19% 21 2.66% 701 88.96% 788
Jefferson 491 96.27% 18 3.53% 1 0.20% 473 92.75% 510
Jones 637 71.98% 194 21.92% 54 6.10% 443 50.06% 885
Kemper 680 81.73% 86 10.34% 66 7.93% 594 71.39% 832
Lafayette 1,020 90.83% 91 8.10% 12 1.07% 929 82.72% 1,123
Lauderdale 1,390 92.98% 57 3.81% 48 3.21% 1,333 89.16% 1,495
Lawrence 527 79.25% 120 18.05% 18 2.71% 407 61.20% 665
Leake 990 95.56% 26 2.51% 20 1.93% 964 93.05% 1,036
Lee 1,031 91.73% 63 5.60% 30 2.67% 968 86.12% 1,124
Leflore 430 98.40% 6 1.37% 1 0.23% 424 97.03% 437
Lincoln 530 69.01% 225 29.30% 13 1.69% 305 39.71% 768
Lowndes 746 96.63% 21 2.72% 5 0.65% 725 93.91% 772
Madison 663 90.33% 67 9.13% 4 0.54% 596 81.20% 734
Marion 487 71.51% 182 26.73% 12 1.76% 305 44.79% 681
Marshall 1,085 92.18% 91 7.73% 1 0.08% 994 84.45% 1,177
Monroe 1,272 93.81% 62 4.57% 22 1.62% 1,210 89.23% 1,356
Montgomery 825 94.72% 28 3.21% 18 2.07% 797 91.50% 871
Neshoba 793 86.10% 41 4.45% 87 9.45% 706[lower-alpha 2] 76.66% 921
Newton 1,183 98.42% 16 1.33% 3 0.25% 1,167 97.09% 1,202
Noxubee 626 96.90% 7 1.08% 13 2.01% 613[lower-alpha 2] 94.89% 646
Oktibbeha 663 96.23% 14 2.03% 12 1.74% 649 94.19% 689
Panola 1,042 96.13% 33 3.04% 9 0.83% 1,009 93.08% 1,084
Pearl River 201 82.38% 41 16.80% 2 0.82% 160 65.57% 244
Perry 417 66.30% 197 31.32% 15 2.38% 220 34.98% 629
Pike 1,244 90.28% 131 9.51% 3 0.22% 1,113 80.77% 1,378
Pontotoc 732 75.31% 182 18.72% 58 5.97% 550 56.58% 972
Prentiss 902 79.75% 210 18.57% 19 1.68% 692 61.18% 1,131
Quitman 114 76.51% 34 22.82% 1 0.67% 80 53.69% 149
Rankin 814 93.46% 45 5.17% 12 1.38% 769 88.29% 871
Scott 659 94.41% 17 2.44% 22 3.15% 637[lower-alpha 2] 91.26% 698
Sharkey 186 88.57% 18 8.57% 6 2.86% 168 80.00% 210
Simpson 487 83.82% 74 12.74% 20 3.44% 413 71.08% 581
Smith 542 87.99% 73 11.85% 1 0.16% 469 76.14% 616
Sunflower 337 97.12% 8 2.31% 2 0.58% 329 94.81% 347
Tallahatchie 503 96.92% 16 3.08% 0 0.00% 487 93.83% 519
Tate 1,030 95.99% 38 3.54% 5 0.47% 992 92.45% 1,073
Tippah 931 88.50% 106 10.08% 15 1.43% 825 78.42% 1,052
Tishomingo 704 85.02% 123 14.86% 1 0.12% 581 70.17% 828
Tunica 197 83.83% 36 15.32% 2 0.85% 161 68.51% 235
Union 1,151 84.69% 189 13.91% 19 1.40% 962 70.79% 1,359
Warren 804 85.08% 136 14.39% 5 0.53% 668 70.69% 945
Washington 580 82.62% 122 17.38% 0 0.00% 458 65.24% 702
Wayne 422 81.47% 74 14.29% 22 4.25% 348 67.18% 518
Webster 683 77.97% 156 17.81% 37 4.22% 527 60.16% 876
Wilkinson 482 93.05% 31 5.98% 5 0.97% 451 87.07% 518
Winston 597 87.92% 42 6.19% 40 5.89% 555 81.74% 679
Yalobusha 931 91.63% 68 6.69% 17 1.67% 863 84.94% 1,016
Yazoo 916 95.42% 15 1.56% 29 3.02% 887[lower-alpha 2] 92.40% 960
Totals51,16987.56%5,7949.91%1,4752.52%45,37577.65%58,438

Notes

  1. These results differ from Dave Leip’s Atlas.
  2. In this county where Barker ran second ahead of McKinley, margin given is Bryan vote minus Barker vote and percentage margin Bryan percentage minus Barker percentage.

References

  1. Dave Leip's U.S. Election Atlas; Presidential General Election Results – Mississippi
  2. Robinson, Edgar Eugene; The Presidential Vote 1896-1932, pp. 241-247 ISBN 9780804716963
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.