Ebla

First Eblaite Kingdom Ebla
c. 3000 BC–c. 2300 BC
The first kingdom at its greatest extent, including vassals
Capital	Ebla
Common languages	Eblaite language
Religion	Ancient Levantine religion.[9]
Government	Monarchy
Historical era	Bronze Age
• Established	c. 3000 BC
• Disestablished	c. 2300 BC
Succeeded by The second kingdom of Mari
Today part of	Syria  Lebanon  Turkey

During the first kingdom period between about 3000 and 2300 BC, Ebla was the most prominent kingdom among the Syrian states, especially during the second half of the 3rd millennium BC, which is known as "the age of the archives" after the Ebla tablets.[7]

The early period between 3000 and 2400 BC is designated "Mardikh IIA".[7][10] General knowledge about the city's history prior to the written archives is obtained through excavations.[11] The first stages of Mardikh IIA is identified with building "CC",[12] and structures that form a part of building "G2",[13] which was apparently a royal palace built c. 2700 BC.[4][14] Toward the end of this period, a hundred years' war with Mari started.[15][16] Mari gained the upper hand through the actions of its king Saʿumu, who conquered many of Ebla's cities.[17] In the mid-25th century BC, king Kun-Damu defeated Mari, but the state's power declined following his reign.[note 2][18]

Royal palace "G"

The archive period, which is designated "Mardikh IIB1", lasted from c. 2400 BC until c. 2300 BC.[7] The end of the period is known as the "first destruction",[19] mainly referring to the destruction of the royal palace (called palace "G" and built over the earlier "G2"),[20] and much of the acropolis.[21] During the archive period, Ebla had political and military dominance over the other Syrian city-states of northern and eastern Syria, which are mentioned in the archives.[22] Most of the tablets, which date from that period, are about economic matters but also include royal letters and diplomatic documents.[23]

The written archives do not date from before Igrish-Halam's reign,[24] which saw Ebla paying tribute to Mari,[25] and an extensive invasion of Eblaite cities in the middle Euphrates region led by the Mariote king Iblul-Il.[26][27] Ebla recovered under King Irkab-Damu in about 2340 BC; becoming prosperous and launching a successful counter-offensive against Mari.[28][29] Irkab-Damu concluded a peace and trading treaty with Abarsal;[note 3][30] it is one of the earliest-recorded treaties in history.[31]

At its greatest extent, Ebla controlled an area roughly half the size of modern Syria,[32] from Ursa'um in the north,[33] to the area around Damascus in the south,[34] and from Phoenicia and the coastal mountains in the west,[35][36] to Haddu in the east.[30][37] Large parts of the kingdom were under the direct control of the king and was administered by governors; the rest consisted of vassal kingdoms.[32] One of the most important of these vassals was Armi,[38] which is the city most often mentioned in the Ebla tablets.[39] Ebla had more than sixty vassal kingdoms and city-states,[40] including Hazuwan, Burman, Emar, Halabitu and Salbatu.[29][37][41]

The vizier was the king's chief official.[42] The holder of the office possessed great authority; the most powerful vizier was Ibrium, who campaigned against Abarsal during the term of his predecessor Arrukum.[43] During the reign of Isar-Damu, Ebla continued the war against Mari, which defeated Ebla's ally Nagar, blocking trade routes between Ebla and southern Mesopotamia via upper Mesopotamia.[25] Ebla conducted regular military campaigns against rebellious vassals,[43] including several attacks on Armi,[44][45][39] and a campaign against the southern region of Ib'al—close to Qatna.[43][46] In order to settle the war with Mari, Isar-Damu allied with Nagar and Kish.[47] The campaign was headed by the Eblaite vizier Ibbi-Sipish, who led the combined armies to victory in a battle near Terqa.[43] The alliance also attacked Armi and occupied it, leaving Ibbi-Sipish's son Enzi-Malik as governor.[39] Ebla suffered its first destruction a few years after the campaign,[48] probably following Isar-Damu's death.[49]

The first destruction occurred c. 2300 BC; palace "G" was burned, baking the clay tablets of the royal archives and preserving them.[50] Many theories about the cause and the perpetrator have been posited:[48]

Akkadian soldier of Naram-Sin, with helmet and long sword, on the Nasiriyah stele. He carries a metal vessel of Anatolian type.[51]

• High (early) dating hypothesis: Giovanni Pettinato supports an early dating for Ebla that would put the destruction at around 2500 BC.[note 4][53] Pettinato, while preferring the date of 2500 BC, later accepted the event could have happened in 2400 BC.[note 5][54] The scholar suggests the city was destroyed in 2400 BC by a Mesopotamian such as Eannatum of Lagash—who boasted of taking tribute from Mari—or Lugalzagesi of Umma, who claimed to have reached the Mediterranean.[note 6][54]
• Akkadian hypothesis: Both kings Sargon of Akkad and his grandson Naram-Sin claimed to have destroyed a town called Ibla,[55] The discoverer of Ebla, Paolo Matthiae, considers Sargon a more likely culprit;[note 7][57] his view is supported by Trevor Bryce,[58] but rejected by Michael Astour.[note 8][62] The conquest of Armanum and Ebla on the Mediterranean coast by Naram-Sin is mentioned in several of his inscriptions:[63]

"Whereas, for all time since the creation of mankind, no king whosoever had destroyed Armanum and Ebla, the god Nergal, by means of (his) weapons opened the way for Naram-Sin, the mighty, and gave him Armanum and Ebla. Further, he gave to him the Amanus, the Cedar Mountain, and the Upper Sea. By means of the weapons of the god Dagan, who magnifies his kingship, Naram-Sin, the mighty, conquered Armanum and Ebla."

— Inscription of Naram-Sin. E 2.1.4.26[63]

• Mari's revenge: According to Alfonso Archi and Maria Biga, the destruction happened approximately three or four years after the battle of Terqa.[48] Archi and Biga say the destruction was caused by Mari[48] in retaliation for its humiliating defeat at Terqa.[64] This view is supported by Mario Liverani.[43] Archi says the Mariote king Isqi-Mari destroyed Ebla before ascending the throne of his city.[65]
• Natural catastrophe: Astour says a natural catastrophe caused the blaze which ended the archive period.[21] He says the destruction was limited to the area of the royal palace and there is no convincing evidence of looting.[21] He dates the fire to c. 2290 BC (Middle Chronology).[66]

Second Eblaite Kingdom Ebla
c. 2300 BC–c. 2000 BC
Approximate borders of the second kingdom
Capital	Ebla
Government	Monarchy
Historical era	Bronze Age
• Established	c. 2300 BC
• Disestablished	c. 2000 BC

The second kingdom's period is designated "Mardikh IIB2", and spans the period between 2300 and 2000 BC.[19] The second kingdom lasted until Ebla's second destruction, which occurred anytime between 2050 and 1950 BC, with the 2000 BC dating being a mere formal date.[67][68] The Akkadians under Sargon of Akkad and his descendant Naram-Sin invaded the northern borders of Ebla aiming for the forests of the Amanus Mountain; the intrusions were separated by roughly 90 years and the areas attacked were not attached to Akkad.[16] Archi accept that the Ibla mentioned in the annals of Sargon and Naram-Sin is the Syrian Ebla but do not consider them responsible for the destruction which ended the Archive period.[69] By the time of Naram-Sin, Armi was the hegemonic city in northern Syria and was destroyed by the Akkadian king.[70]

Palace "P5"

A new local dynasty ruled the second kingdom of Ebla,[58] but there was continuity with its first kingdom heritage.[71] Ebla maintained its earliest features, including its architectural style and the sanctity of the first kingdom's religious sites.[72] A new royal palace was built in the lower town,[73] and the transition from the archive period is marked only by the destruction of palace "G".[21] Little is known about the second kingdom because no written material have been discovered aside from one inscription dating to the end of the period.[73]

The second kingdom was attested to in contemporaneous sources; in an inscription, Gudea of Lagash asked for cedars to be brought from Urshu in the mountains of Ebla, indicating Ebla's territory included Urshu north of Carchemish in modern-day Turkey.[74] Texts that dates to the seventh year of Amar-Sin (c. 2040 BC),[note 9] a ruler of the Ur III empire, mention a messenger of the Ensí ("Megum") of Ebla.[note 10][note 11][81] The second kingdom was considered a vassal by the Ur III government,[82] but the nature of the relation is unknown and it included the payment of tribute.[83] A formal recognition of Ur's overlordship appears to be a condition for the right of trade with that empire.[33]

The second kingdom disintegrated toward the end of the 21st century BC,[33] and ended with the destruction of the city by fire, although evidence for the event has only been found outside of the so-called "Temple of the Rock", and in the area around palace "E" on the acropolis.[72] The reason for the destruction is not known;[72] according to Astour, it could have been the result of a Hurrian invasion c. 2030 BC,[84] led by the former Eblaite vassal city of Ikinkalis.[note 12][86] The destruction of Ebla is mentioned in the fragmentary Hurro-Hittite legendary epic "Song of Release" discovered in 1983,[87] which Astour considers as describing the destruction of the second kingdom.[88] In the epic, an Eblaite assembly led by a man called "Zazalla" prevents king Meki from showing mercy to prisoners from Ebla's former vassal Ikinkalis,[85] provoking the wrath of the Hurrian storm god Teshub and causing him to destroy the city.[89]

Third Eblaite Kingdom Ebla
c. 2000 BC–c. 1600 BC
Capital	Ebla
Common languages	Amorite language.[90]
Religion	ancient Levantine Religion
Government	Monarchy
Historical era	Bronze Age
• Established	c. 2000 BC
• Disestablished	c. 1600 BC
Succeeded by Hittites

Statue fragment of Ibbit-Lim.

The third kingdom is designated "Mardikh III"; it is divided into periods "A" (c. 2000–1800 BC) and "B" (c. 1800–1600 BC).[19] In period "A", Ebla was quickly rebuilt as a planned city.[91] The foundations covered the remains of Mardikh II; new palaces and temples were built, and new fortifications were built in two circles—one for the low city and one for the acropolis.[91] The city was laid out on regular lines and large public buildings were built.[92][93] Further construction took place in period "B".[92]

The vizier palace

The first known king of the third kingdom is Ibbit-Lim,[94] who described himself as the Mekim of Ebla.[note 13][78] A basalt votive statue bearing Ibbit-Lim's inscription was discovered in 1968; this helped to identify the site of Tell-Mardikh with the ancient kingdom Ebla.[78][94] The name of the king is Amorite in the view of Pettinato; it is therefore probable the inhabitants of third kingdom Ebla were predominantly Amorites, as were most of the inhabitants of Syria at that time.[96]

By the beginning of the 18th century BC, Ebla had become a vassal of Yamhad, an Amorite kingdom centered in Aleppo.[97][98] Written records are not available for this period, but the city was still a vassal during Yarim-Lim III of Yamhad's reign.[92] One of the known rulers of Ebla during this period was Immeya, who received gifts from the Egyptian Pharaoh Hotepibre, indicating the continuing wide connections and importance of Ebla.[99] The city was mentioned in tablets from the Yamhadite vassal city of Alalakh in modern-day Turkey; an Eblaite princess married a son of King Ammitaqum of Alalakh, who belonged to a branch of the royal Yamhadite dynasty.[100][101]

Ebla was destroyed by the Hittite King Mursili I in about 1600 BC.[102] Indilimma was probably the last king of Ebla;[103] a seal of his crown prince Maratewari was discovered in the western palace "Q".[103][104] According to Archi, the "Song of Release" epic describes the destruction of the third kingdom and preserves older elements.[85]

Ebla never recovered from its third destruction. It was a small village in the phase designated "Mardikh IV" (1600–1200 BC),[102] and was mentioned in the records of Alalakh as a vassal to the Idrimi dynasty.[105] "Mardikh V" (1200–535 BC) was a rural, Early Iron Age settlement that grew in size during later periods.[102] Further development occurred during "Mardikh VI", which lasted until c. 60 AD.[102] "Mardikh VII" began in the 3rd century AD and lasted until the 7th century,[106] after which the site was abandoned.[107]

Ebla's landmarks

Ebla consisted of a lower town and a raised acropolis in the center.[108] During the first kingdom, the city had an area of 56 hectares and was protected by mud-brick fortifications.[109] Ebla was divided into four districts—each with its own gate in the outer wall.[110] The acropolis included the king's palace "G",[111] and one of two temples in city dedicated to Kura (called the "Red Temple").[112] The lower city included the second temple of Kura in the southeast called "Temple of the Rock".[113] During the second kingdom, a royal palace (Archaic Palace "P5") was built in the lower town northwest of the acropolis,[77] in addition to temple "D" built over the destroyed "Red Temple".[114]

During the third kingdom, Ebla was a large city nearly 60 hectares in size,[115] and was protected by a fortified rampart, with double chambered gates.[116] The acropolis was fortified and separated from the lower town.[117] New royal palace "E" was built on the acropolis (during Mardikh IIIB),[93] and a temple of Ishtar was constructed over the former "Red" and "D" temples (in area "D").[118][112] The lower town was also divided into four districts;[110] palace "P5" was used during Mardikh IIIA,[119] and replaced during Mardikh IIIB by the "Intermediate Palace".[116]

Other third kingdom buildings included the vizier palace,[note 14][120] the western palace (in area "Q"),[104] the temple of Shamash (temple "N"), the temple of Rasap (temple "B1") and the northern palace (built over the "Intermediate Palace").[116][121] In the north of the lower town, a second temple for Ishtar was built,[122] while the former "Temple of the Rock" was replaced by a temple of Hadad.[note 15][122]

The western palace "Q" situated above the royal necropolis

The kings of the first kingdom were buried outside the city; the last ten kings (ending with Irkab-Damu) were buried in Darib,[123] while older kings were buried in a royal mausoleum located in Binas and only one royal tomb dating to the first kingdom was discovered in Ebla (Hypogeum G4).[124] This first kingdom tomb was probably built during the reign of the last king and might be an indication of Eblaite adoption of Mesopotamian traditions to bury the kings beneath their royal palaces.[124]

The third kingdom royal necropolis was discovered beneath palace Q (the western palace); it contains many hypogea but only three were excavated.[125] Those tombs were natural caves in the bedrock of the palace's foundation; they all date to the 19th and 18th centuries BC and had a similar plan consisting of an entrance shaft, burial chambers and a dromos connecting the shaft to the chamber.[72][126][127]

The royal tomb found in the royal palace G is designated hypogeum G4; it dates to the archive period, most probably the reign of Isar-Damu.[128] The tomb is heavily damaged; most of its stones were sacked and nothing of the roof system remains.[129] It also lacks any skeletal remains or funerary goods suggesting that it was either heavily pillaged, never used, or was built as a cenotaph.[129]

Excavated between 1992 and 1995, it is located underneath the western sector of the palace at a depth of almost 6 meters.[129] The tomb is composed of two rooms opened on each other's with lime plaster floors.[129] Both rooms are rectangular in shape; the eastern room (L.6402) is 4 meters wide, more than 3,5 meters long (total length is unknown due to heavy damage) and west-east oriented.[130] The western room (L.5762) is 5.20 meters long, 4 meters wide and west-east oriented.[131] Limestone was used to build the walls and few blocks protruding from the sides toward the middle of the rooms suggest the roof to have been a corbelled vault.[129][130]

Plan of the western palace tombs

• The tomb of the princess: dating to c. 1800 BC, it is the oldest and smallest of the third kingdom tombs found.[127][132] Excavated in 1978,[132] it contained the remains of a young woman, hence the naming.[133] The dormos has steps, partially cut in the bedrock and partially paved with stones, leading to the chamber, which was achieved through the enlargement of a natural cave.[134] The tomb is the only one not pillaged;[135] it contained precious jewels and funerary objects.[136]
• The tomb of the cisterns: this tomb is the most damaged in the necropolis.[127] It consists of a double room burial; the earliest, (Q79A), was built at the same period of the tomb of the princess, and was badly damaged when the tomb was reused, and a dromos was built in the place of Q79A toward the end of the 17th century BC (leading to the founding of burial Q79B).[134] This was probably the resting place of a king; a club (a symbol of royal power) was discovered in Q79A.[134]
• The tomb of the lord of the goats: it is the largest in the necropolis; it includes two depositional chambers and is reached through a vertical shaft.[134] The occupier of the tomb is not known with certainty, he is called the lord of the goats by archaeologists due to the existence of a throne decorated with bronze goat heads in the tomb.[137] A silver cup that has the name of king Immeya inscribed was found in the tomb making that king the most likely owner of the burial.[138]

The queen shared the running of affairs of state with the king.[111] The crown prince was involved in internal matters and the second prince was involved in foreign affairs.[111] Most duties, including military ones, were handled by the vizier and the administration, which consisted of 13 court dignitaries—each of whom controlled between 400 and 800 men forming a bureaucracy with 11,700 people.[139] Each of the four quarters of the lower city was governed by a chief inspector and many deputies.[111] To oversee royal interest, the king employed agents (mashkim), collectors (ur) and messengers (kas).[32]

Many client kingdoms owed allegiance to Ebla and each was ruled by its own king (En); those vassal kings were highly autonomous, paying tribute and supplying military assistance to Ebla.[32] The administrative center in the capital was named the "SA.ZA"; it included the royal palaces, storerooms and some temples.[141] Regions beyond the walls of the capital were collectively named in Eblaite texts "uru-bar" (literally meaning outside of the city).[141] The villages and towns under the central authority were either ruled directly from the capital,[141] or had appointed officials.[141] The titles of the civil servants do not clearly define the bearer's responsibilities and authority as each town had its own political traditions.[142]

• Lugal: while in Mesopotamia a lugal designated a king, in Ebla it designated a governor who was directly under the authority of the capital.[143] The nature of this title as part of Eblaite bureaucracy is ambiguous; each lugal was under the authority of the grand vizier,[144] and the bearers ruled cities directly under the authority of the capital and they all brought goods to be kept in Ebla's storehouses.[141] Pettinato counted 14 different lugals in the Eblaite administrative texts and deduced that the kingdom was divided into fourteen departments; two of them in the capital itself and the remaining twelve spanned the rest of the kingdom.[145]
• Ugula: the title is translated as superintendent; some ugulas were independent rulers and some represented the highest authority of a tribal group.[146] Many cities had an appointed ugula as their head of administration such as the city of Darum.[141]

The regions under the direct control of the king that were economically vital for the capital are called the "chora" by archaeologists.[7][147] Regions under direct control of the king extended beyond the chora and it is difficult to determine the exact size of the kingdom and the chora due to the constant military expansion of Ebla which added new territories; some of those were ruled directly while others were allowed to retain their own rulers as vassals.[147]

Generally, the chora is the core region of Ebla that includes the economic hinterland supporting the capital.[7] It includes the cities and villages where the king or his vizier had palaces, towns that included important sanctuaries of gods related to the royal institution, towns visited by the monarch during the different rituals he participated in (such as the renewal of royalty ritual),[note 16] and other cities such as the ones where textiles were delivered.[149] The chora spans around 3000 km²; from west to east it includes the plains east of Jabal Zawiya, the Maṭkh swamp, al-Hass mountain and mount Shabīth.[150] Areas directly on the borders of the chora such as al-Ghab, al-Rouge plain and al-Jabbul have close cultural affinity with the chora.[150]

Royal palace G courtyard

Mardikh II's periods shared the same culture.[119] the population of Ebla during Mardikh IIB1 is estimated to have numbered around 40,000 in the capital, and over 200,000 people in the entire kingdom.[151] The Eblaites of Mardikh II were Semites, close to their North-Western Semitic neighbors, such as the Amorites.[152] Giovanni Pettinato said the Eblaite language, one of the oldest attested Semitic languages,[153] was a West Semitic language; Gelb and others said it was an East Semitic dialect closer to the Akkadian language.[154] Academic consensus considers Eblaite an East-Semitic language which exhibits both West-Semitic and East-Semitic features.[note 17][155][156]

Ebla held several religious and social festivals, including rituals for the succession of a new king, which normally lasted for several weeks.[157] The Eblaite calendars were based on a solar year divided into twelve months.[158] Two calendars were discovered; the "old calendar" used during the reign of Igrish-Halam, and a "new calendar" introduced by vizier Ibbi-Sipish.[158] Many months were named in honor of deities; in the new calendar, "Itu be-li" was the first month of the year, and meant "the month of the lord".[159] Each year was given a name instead of a number.[160]

Women received salaries equal to those of men and could accede to important positions and head government agencies.[161] The Eblaites imported Kungas from Nagar,[note 18][163] and used them to draw the carriages of royalty and high officials, as well as diplomatic gifts for allied cities.[163] Society was less centered around the palace and the temple than in Mesopotamian kingdoms. The Eblaite palace was designed around the courtyard, which was open toward the city, thus making the administration approachable. This contrasts with Mesopotamian palaces, which resembled citadels with narrow entrances and limited access to the external courtyard.[164] Music played an important part in the society and musicians were both locals,[165] or hired from other cities such as Mari.[166] Ebla also hired acrobats from Nagar, but later reduced their number and kept some to train local Eblaite acrobats.[167]

The Mardikh III population was predominately Semitic Amorite.[96] The Amorites were mentioned in the first kingdom's tablets as neighbors and as rural subjects,[168] and they came to dominate Ebla after the destruction of the second kingdom.[169] The city witnessed a great increase in construction, and many palaces, temples and fortifications were built.[170] The Amorite Eblaites worshiped many of the same deities as the Eblaites of earlier periods,[171] and maintained the sanctity of the acropolis in the center of the city.[72] The third kingdom's iconography and royal ideology were under the influence of Yamhad's culture; kingship was received from the Yamhadite deities instead of Ishtar of Ebla, which is evident by the Eblaite seals of Indilimma's period.[172]

At the beginning of the process of deciphering the tablets, Giovanni Pettinato made claims about a possible connections between Ebla and the Bible,[200] citing an alleged references in the tablets to the existence of Yahweh, the Patriarchs, Sodom and Gomorrah and other Biblical references.[200] However, much of the initial media excitement about a supposed Eblaite connections with the Bible, based on preliminary guesses and speculations by Pettinato and others, is now widely discredited and the academic consensus is that Ebla "has no bearing on the Minor Prophets, the historical accuracy of the Biblical Patriarchs, Yahweh worship, or Sodom and Gomorrah".[200] In Ebla studies, the focus has shifted away from comparisons with the Bible; Ebla is now studied as a civilization in its own right.[200] The claims led to a bitter personal and academic conflict between the scholars involved, as well as what some described as political interference by the Syrian authorities.[201]

The four thousand year old tablets constitute one of the oldest archives and libraries ever found;[212] there is tangible evidence of their arrangement and even classification.[213] The larger tablets had originally been stored on shelves, but had fallen onto the floor when the palace was destroyed.[214] The locations of the fallen tablets allowed the excavators to reconstruct their original positions on the shelves; they found the tablets had originally been shelved according to subject.[209]

These features were absent from earlier Sumerian excavations. Sophisticated techniques of arrangement of texts, coupled with their composition, evidence the great antiquity of archival and library practices, which may be far older than was assumed to be the case before the discovery of the Ebla library.[213] A sizable portion of the tablets contain literary and lexicographic texts; evidence seems to suggest the collection also served—at least partially—as a true library rather than a collection of archives intended solely for use by the kings, their ministers, and their bureaucracy.[213] The tablets show evidence of the early transcription of texts into foreign languages and scripts, classification and cataloging for easier retrieval, and arrangement by size, form and content.[213] The Ebla tablets have thus provided scholars with new insights into the origin of library practices that were in use 4,500 years ago.[213]

Ebla's first kingdom is an example of early Syrian centralized states,[215] and is considered one of the earliest empires by scholars,[36][216] such as Samuel Finer,[139] and Karl Moore, who considers it the first-recorded world power.[217] Ebla's discovery changed the former view of Syria's history as a bridge between Mesopotamia and Egypt; it proved the region was a center of civilization in its own right.[218]

• Marchetti, Nicolò; Nigro, Lorenzo (1997). "Cultic Activities in the Sacred Area of Ishtar at Ebla during the Old Syrian Period: The "Favissae" F.5327 and F.5238". Journal of Cuneiform Studies. The American Schools of Oriental Research. 49: 1–44. doi:10.2307/1359889. ISSN 0022-0256. JSTOR 1359889.
• Matthiae, Paolo (1976). "Ebla in the Late Early Syrian Period: The Royal Palace and the State Archives". The Biblical Archaeologist. The American Schools of Oriental Research. 39 (3): 94–113. doi:10.2307/3209400. ISSN 0006-0895. JSTOR 3209400.