History of Pernambuco

Despite established indigenous peoples, numerous revolts, fleeting independence movements, short-term French incursions, and an occupation (1630-1654) by the Dutch West Indies Company, the history of Pernambuco is conveniently divided into two parts: as a colony of Portugal and (from 1808) as a component of the nation of Brazil. A more detailed treatment of Pernambuco as a colony of Portugal will be found at the Captaincy of Pernambuco. This article will treat pre-colonial and colonial Pernambuco briefly and focus primarily on Pernambuco as a province of, and today a state in, the Brazilian nation.

Flag of Pernambuco adopted from the 1817 Revolution Flag

Pernambuco is located in the Northeast region of Brazil where the South American continent extends furthest into the South Atlantic toward Africa. Despite early successes; first, as a source of red dye, and, second, as a sugar producer, Pernambuco has, up until the close of the Twentieth Century, languished as part of Brazil’s underdeveloped Northeastern region. Among the several impediments to the (re)development of Pernambuco, after the expulsion of the Dutch in 1654, have been the latifundia, monoculture, poor communication, poor transportation, and regionalism. In the late Twentieth Century Pernambuco has found success as it developed an industrial sector as improved communication and transportation in Brazil has reduced the affects of regionalism and monoculture.


Name

Recent research indicates that the name Pernambuco derives from "Boca de Fernão" (Fernão's Mouth).[1] The place, now known as Canal de Santa Cruz, is where Fernão de Noronha loaded his ships with Brazilian wood to trade in Europe.[2] The name was spoken by the Tupi as "Pernãobuka," and was recorded by French writers as "Fernambouc"; the two pronunciations have been combined into the name most common today.

Previously, Pernambuco was believed to be a distortion of the Tupi words para-nã (wide river) and 'Mbuka' (hollow or broken), referring to coastal reefs; in it came to mean the place where the tree Paubrasilia (Caesalpinia echinata) was discovered, now referred as Pernambuco wood or brazilwood. The source of a brilliant red dye, the trees grew in abundance on the Atlantic coast of Brazil and were the chief trading commodity of pre-colonial and early colonial times.

Prehistory and antiquity

The Brazilian northeast has some of the country's most ancient archaeological sites, which date back to more than 40,000 years BCE. In the region that today corresponds to Pernambuco, relics of human occupation from around 9,000 BCE were identified in the regions of Chã do Caboclo, in Bom Jardim, Furna do Estragon, and Brejo da Madre de Deus. In this last region, an important necropolis was found, out of which 83 skeletons were recovered.[3][4]

Among the Indigenous groups that inhabit Pernambuco, the Itaparica are responsible for stone instruments from about 4000 BCE and cave paintings that date to around the year zero are attributed to the Cariris people. At the time of Portuguese colonization, the Tabajaras, Tupinambá and the Caetés lived in the area.[5] In certain parts of the state, it is still possible to find Indigenous groups, such as the Pankararu and the Atikum.[3]

Portuguese arrival and precolonial

At the time of the discovery of Brazil, the area near Recife in the modern state of Pernambuco was populated chiefly by Tabajara Indians.[6][7] The Tabajara were members of the Tupi-Guarani linguistic group. The Portuguese had more successful dealings with the Tupi-Guarani speakers than with speakers of other languages.[8]

The cultures of the indigenous peoples of Brazil included aspects that the Portuguese and other Europeans found objectionable. Most of these peoples bathed, most of them went nude, and many of them were cannibals.[9] In contrast to these cultural differences (to which the Portuguese objected) Tupi-Guarani speakers had a significant cultural attribute that made them valuable to the Portuguese. Although still generally hunter-gatherers, Tupi speaking aborigines, including the Tabajara, practiced agriculture.[8]

This attribute was a key to the cooperation of the Tupi speakers and the Portuguese both during the precolonial period, when exploiting Brazilwood was the principal economic activity, as well as later when colonization began. Throughout much of Brazil, up to modern times, coivara (slash-and-burn) agriculture was common. Among the indigenous peoples, the men did the heavy work of clearing new ground and the women planted, cultivated, and harvested crops. [10] These peoples were quick to abandon their stone tools for metal tools which made clearing trees much easier. Trading shiploads of Brazilwood for axes and other metal tools was quite to their advantage since the metal tools would greatly ease their labor in clearing the ground.[11]

The brazilwood tree, which gives Brazil its name, has dark, valuable wood and provides red dye.

In turning to the exploitation of Brazilwood, it is a coincidence that modern-day Pernambuco includes the Islands of Fernando de Noronha, which precedes the mainland Pernambuco's history since the islands were granted to Fernão de Loronha by King Manoel in 1502. Moreover, it was Fernão de Loronha to whom King Manoel granted an exclusive license to exploit Brazilwood.[12] As the Portuguese quickly began exploiting Brazilwood, they mostly trans-shipped it to Northern Europe. The red dye from Brazilwood became particularly popular in France and it was not long before ships of other nations, especially French ships, began competing with the Portuguese.[11] The Portuguese King soon responded to these violations of what he considered his sovereign territory. In 1516, Cristóvão Jacques was charged with patrolling the coast of Pernambuco against vessels of other nations.

Cristóvão Jacques erected a feitoria (literally 'factory', a Portuguese trading post) at the entrance of the Canal de Santa Cruz, Itamaracá, intended to establish a bond with the natives, seek information about possible riches inland, and repel encroachment by other nations on the Brazilian coast. Later the French under Bertrand d'Ornesan once again tried to establish a French trading post at Pernambuco in 1531.[13] The Portuguese responded by sending an armada led by Pero Lopes de Sousa who burned the French fort and reestablished Portuguese control in the area.[14] Shortly after this success in dislodging the French from Pernambuco's northern border with Itamaricá, the Portuguese began to settle in Brazil. Beginning in 1534 King John III of Portugal granted hereditary captaincies to better secure Brazil against foreign interlopers.[15]

The Early Colonial Period from 1534 to 1630

By 1534 it was evident to the King of Portugal, Dom João III, that to retain his rights to Brazil it would have to be settled by Portuguese. At the time the riches of Asia seemed more worthy of royal management and so Dom João used the captaincy system that had be previously used in the Azores and other island possessions of Portugal. The Captaincy of Pernambuco comprising sixty leagues along the Atlantic Coast the island of Itamaracá to the North to the River Sao Francisco to the South was granted to Duarte Coelho. [16]

Duarte Coelho arrived in Nova Lusitânia (or "New Lusitania") in 1535 along with his wife Dona Brites de Albuquerque, her brother Jeronimo de Albuquerque, and a small armada of settlers and supplies to found his captaincy.[17] Despite historians having few remaining documents relating to Duarte Coelho's governance of what was decidedly the most successful of all the initial captaincies of Brasil, it is clear that the first donatário's initial efforts set Pernambuco on the path to success and established the monoculture and latifundia such that the history of Pernambuco could not be told without reference to sugar. Duarte Coehlo directed military actions against the French-allied Caeté Indians and upon their defeat in 1537 established a settlement at the site of a former Marin Indian village, henceforth known as Olinda, as well as another village at Igarassu. Duarte Coelho, and his heirs, throughout the Sixteenth Century, enjoyed a free hand in developing his captaincy as an enormously successful producer ofsugar adn Portugals richest Brazilian colony. [18] This success continued up until the invasion of Pernambuco by the Dutch in 1630.

The Dutch Occupation from 1630 to 1654

From the beginnings of European expansion into the New World, other ‘actors’ both nations and various outlaws vied to loot the wealth of the New World. Portugal colonized Brazil to keep others out, mostly the French. Beginning in 1580 until 1640 Portugal was under the Spanish Hapsburgs. This made Brazil a prime target for the Dutch. After a failed attempt to take Bahia, the Dutch invaded Pernambuco and then expanded Northward to the Amazon. The colonists of the Captaincy of Pernambuco to a greater or lesser extent resisted the Dutch throughout the Dutch occupation. There were three significant periods. From invasion in 1630 to relative pacification about 1636; during the governorship of Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen, under whom the Portuguese resisted to lesser extent, and whom, historian Noell Deere called, "The most remarkable man ever associated with the sugar industry";[19] and, from shortly after the recall of Johan Maurits 1644 until the final expulsion of the Dutch from Recife in 1654.[20]

The Late Colonial Period from 1655 to 1807

Prior to the occupation by the Dutch, Pernambuco had been the pre-eminent Portuguese captaincy in Brazil. The colonists never succeeded in restoring this primacy. Various factors were involved. During the Dutch occupation Bahia had become a great sugar producer. Moreover, when the Dutch left Brazil they established sugar colonies in the Caribbean and so competition was fierce both within Brazil and internationally. Additionally, in the late Seventeenth Century gold was discovered in Minas Gerais, later diamonds were discovered. Thus when Brazil became a nation, despite the fact that sugar was still a major export, and that Pernambuco was still a major producer, nevertheless Pernambuco was relatively much less important in the new nation.[21][22]

Pernambuco as Brazil becomes a nation

Retrospectively viewed the independence of Brazil seem almost an inevitable result of the events of the early Nineteenth Century, particularlly the arrival of the Portuguese Royal family in Brazil. Ultimately Brazil would remain territorially intact (save for the loss of what is today Uruguay). Nevertheless, there were rebellions in regions of Brazil which might have led to the division of Brazil similar to the division of the Spanish-speaking areas of Latin America.[23] Although many of these events influenced Pernambucan history, they are better treated as part of the History of Brazil and except for those events that happened in Pernambuco these will, along with a few events entirely external to Brazil, be parenthesized to provide context.

Pernambuco's revolts

See Also Rebellions and revolutions in Brazil

"...Pernambuco, the classic land of revolution...."[24]

Two meaningful themes explaining events (in Pernambuco) leading up to, directly relating to, or following on the independence of Brazil were, first, regionalism and, second, the continuing conflict between the mozombos (Brazilians: those born in Brazil) and the reinóis (Portuguese: born in Portugal).[25] The previously described War of the Mascates can be seen as a precursor of the strife between the Brazilian born and reinóis in the new nation of Brazil.

(The U. S. War for Independence, 1776; the French Revolution, 1789; and the slave rebellion in Haiti, 1792, exerted influence in Brazil.)

The 1817 revolution flag, with three stars representing Pernambuco, Paraíba, and Rio Grande do Norte

The Inconfidencia Mineira,1789(; the Inconfidencia of Rio de Janeiro, 1794; the Inconfidencia of Bahia, 1798;) and the Inconfidencia of Pernambuco, 1801 were not too consequential rebellions involving mostly intellectuals.

(In 1808 the Spanish-American Revolutions began, but more importantly, the Portuguese royal family arrived in Brazil in 1808 fleeing Napoleon's invasion of Portugal. When, on arrival, Prince Regent João opened Brazil's ports it was a big boost to many aspects of the Brazilian economy.)

(In 1815, Brazil was elevated to a kingdom. In 1816 Queen Maria died and the reign of João VI began.) In 1817 Pernambuco rebelled preferring a republic to a monarch, the rebellion was quickly put down by naval and land forces of the monarchy and its leaders were executed.[25]

(In 1821 King João acceded to the request of the Portuguese Cortes and returned to Lisbon, leaving his son Pedro as regent in Brazil, but taking all the treasury monies and movable assets with him. In 1822, the Cortes, meeting in Lisbon, imprudently took several actions trying to reduce Brazil to its previous status as a colony and Prince Pedro issued the Grito do Ipiranga, “Independence or death” and the Empire of Brazil was born.)[26]

The flag of the Confederation of the Equator.

(In 1824 The emperor, Pedro I, promulgated a constitution for the Empire that would hold until the empire ended in 1889.) This same year, in reaction to the new constitution, Pernambuco again rebelled, and together with Ceará and Paraíba formed the Confederation of the Equator, once again naval and land forces put down the rebellion in short order[26] and executed the leaders.[25] Additionally, by imperial decree, the size of Pernambuco was substantially reduced, removing the comarca of São Francisco from Pernambuco and reducing the Sertão (backlands) belonging to Pernambuco.[27]

(In 1825, Brazil engaged in war with Argentina over what became modern-day Uruguay after the two countries fought to an inconclusive result.)[26]

(In 1826, Pedro I, abdicated in favor of his five-year-old son. Pedro, like his father, took ship to Lisbon. There he would succeed in installing his daughter on the throne of Portugal and shortly thereafter die.)[26]

In 1829, Pernambuco would again rebel and again be quickly subdued.[26]

The War of the Cabanos, 1832–1836, differed from most of the rebellions in Pernambuco because, while there were elements of regionalism and resentment of the Portuguese, this was substantially a popular revolt, whereas the other rebellions in Pernambuco were substantially affairs of the elites. The leader, Vincente Ferreira de Paulo can be considered a populist caudilho, moreover, this rebellion was agrarian based-whereas other rebellions were substantially confined to Recife. (This rebellion also had a link to the 1844 Cabanagem in Alagoas).[26]

The Praieira revolt, the last unsuccessful revolt during the Empire in Brazil, occurred in Pernambuco in 1847–48. This revolt, again due to resentment of the Portuguese and factionalism, was put down by imperial forces though with somewhat fewer reprisals than in earlier revolts.[23]

Geography

The territory of Pernambuco varied considerably during the colonial period and the current borders were set in the Nineteenth Century after 1799 when Ceará was detached from Pernambuco and by the detachment of the comarca of São Francisco in 1824. Most of the history of Pernambuco, especially prior to the Nineteenth Century pertains to the zona da mata (what was the forest zone along the coast) where sugar cane grows well. There are two other areas, the agreste, a transitional zone atop the Borborema escarpment where cotton grows well, and the sertão, known for its periodic droughts and resulting famines.[28] There is little historical record of the agreste or the sertão, even in the Nineteenth Century.

Social structure

The following groups typify the major social, economic, and political classes prominent in Pernambuco's history from colonial times well into the Twentieth Century. The elites consisted of governing officials, mostly appointed by an external ruler, senhores de engenho, (owners of sugar mills), and coroneis (colonels), especially in the backlands a local landowner/power-broker. The key group in the elites being the senhores do engenho. On the middle level, lavradores da cana (generally growers of sugar cane who possibly owned land but did not own an engenho, merchants, certain "skilled" workers, for example: mestres de açucar (masters of sugar making). Finally, the lower classes including, slaves, freedmen, share croppers, laborers, etc.[29][30][31]

Literacy, education, publishing

During the colonial era printing presses were not allowed in Brazil and education was limited mostly to the colegios of the religious orders, Moreover, in the colonial era, only a few (in all of Brazil somewhat more than 3000[32]) colonists received degrees in Coimbra. Despite the low literacy rate, even among the free population (15%)[33]) A printing press was in operation by 1817[34] Later the Diario de Pernambuco was established. Today this newspaper claims to be the "oldest continuously circulating daily in Latin America." During the Empire Olinda (later Recife) became the home of the second Law school in Brazil[35]

Economy

From the time of Portuguese settlement, the economy in Pernambuco had been based on latifundia (large estates), monoculture (one-crop), and slavery. Now that Pernambuco was no longer a colony, producing for the Portuguese metropole, changes in the economy occurred and new institutions appeared. Some of these had been long available only in Portugal and some were a function of factors such as the Industrial Revolution. However, overall, during the Empire, the economy of Pernambuco was dominated by the decline of sugar production.[36] While for Brazil the decline of sugar was offset by the growth of the coffee, this was not the case for Pernambuco.

Sugar

In the beginning years of the Empire sugar production in Pernambuco was high and sugar was Brazil's primary export. For example, from 1826 to 1830 exports averaged more than 28,000 crates, up from 9,200 crates in the late Eighteenth Century.[37] However, in the second decade of the Empire, sugar, still Pernambuco's primary export crop, had yielded its primacy as a Brazilian export to coffee. Sugar has never again dominated Brazilian exports[38] and Pernambuco was relegated to being one of two regional leaders in a Brazilian Northeast "increasingly uncompetitive with agricultural producers in the Center-South".[39]

Slavery

The suppression of the Praieiria revolt in 1848 and the Eusébio de Queirós Law, effectively eliminating the Transatlantic slave trade, in 1850[40] further exacerbated the shortage of slaves in Pernambuco that had existed in Pernambuco since the discovery of gold in Minas Gerais (in 1795). This provided further motivation to replace the traditional water-driven and oxen sugar mills first with centralized mills and later with usinas.[41] In 1871, the legislature enacted the "law of the free womb" making free all children of slaves[42] In 1888, under the influence of increasingly urban society, and with the advocacy of intellectuals, such as Pernambucan, politician Joaquim Nabuco slavery was abolished.[43]

Industrialization

By the 1850s there was limited industrialization in Pernambuco with 9 textile mills, a candle factory, and a tobacco factory among others. However, Pernambuco remained an export-oriented, sugar-based economy and during the second half of the Ninetheenth Century industrialization in the sugar industry, in response to the closure of the slave trade, was, at best, of limited success.[44]

Banking

In 1851 the first bank in Pernambuco was established, The Commercial Bank of Pernambuco. Brazil had no banks until the 1840s. The banks would become principal lenders and creditors in Pernambuco displacing the merchants and religious establishments in so doing.[45]

Cotton

Cotton is indigenous to Brazil and has been cultivated in Pernambuco since prehistory. Beginning in the late Eighteenth Century, as a result of the Industrial Revolution cotton became an important export for Pernambuco through the beginning of the Empire. (The U.S. War of 1812 provided an impetus to cotton cultivation, this war provided a much-expanded market for this export crop.) After 1830 United States production largely replaced Brazilian cotton. However, in the decade of the 1860s, during the U. S. Civil War, cotton again became an important export for Pernambuco.[46] Cotton, in contrast with sugar, was grown in the agreste[47]

Railroads and transportation

In 1858 the first railroad in Pernambuco began operation between Recife and Cabo. The railways would primarily speed exports to the external markets. The effects of the railroads in unifying Brazil and improving internal transportation were less significant.[48]

The Abolition of slavery

Pernambuco was little changed by either the abolition of slavery or the change from empire to republic. The elites within Pernambuco mostly maintained their privileged position and the freed slaves mostly became wage workers in an economy where the cost of labor was cheap. The local elites were able to control Pernambuco and allow modernization always with the condition that modernization and change must not interfere with their rights and privileges. Governor Barbosa Lima listed Pernambuco's significant problems in the beginning years of the Republic. Decades later Pedro Souto Maior listed the same problems.[49] Resistance to abolition in Pernambuco was tempered by the economic conditions. The ascendency of coffee in the Brazilian Center-South and the suppression of the Atlantic slave trade had resulted in an internal slave trade that diminshed the number of slaves in Pernambuco and other areas of the Northeast.[50] Limited modernization and consolidation of sugar mills made the sugar industry less reliant on slave labor, moreover, cheap labor in the local market further reduced the need for slaves. As a result of abolition, despite the benefit of freedom, freed slaves mostly melded into an existing labor supply consisting of impoverished workers.[51]

The (Old) Republic

The demise of the Empire and the institution of the Republic were events whose locus was well to the South of Pernambuco. The republicans of Pernambuco were not well organized nor influential. The monarchists quickly became republicans and Pernambuco was little changed. The federal system established by the Old Republic forced states to compete for central government patronage allowing the states in the Southern regions to benefit and reducing benefits to Pernambuco and other states in Brazil's Northeastern region. [52] The elites of Pernambuco were quite successful in maintaining their privileges and control of Pernambuco's governments. Moreover, these governments were aware of Pernambuco's problems (from poverty and drought to latifundia and monoculture) but these problems remained unresolved or worsened, and efforts to address them encountered resistance including violence. Life for the poor was harsh: there was "high fertility, high mortality, malnutrition, and violence....".[53]

The era of Getúlio Vargas

"The figure of Getúlio Vargas dominates the history of Brazil from 1930 to 1954, and his memory still hovers over its politics". Vargas became provisional president in 1930. He was elected constitutional president in 1937. Overthrown in 1945 he was elected president by popular vote in 1954.[54] In contrast to the federalist emphasis of the Old Republic, the Vargas era installed a strong central government.[55] However, Brazil by this time was primarily dominated by São Paulo and Minas Gerais. Pernambuco was still a leading state in the Northeast, but the Northeast as a whole exerted little influence within Brazil.[56]

In 1930, the Democratic Party of Pernambuco was able to seize the opportunity presented at the rise of Getúlio Vargas on the national level to install Lima Cavalcanti as interventor in control of the government of Pernambuco.[57] Cavalcanti would remain in power in Pernambuco until removed by Vargas in 1937.[58] The government of Pernambuco was riven by competition between factions of the elites struggling for control and spoils.[59]

Social and economic conditions

Especially during the early years of Cavalcanti's rule in Pernambuco one of the periodic droughts that recur in the Northeast of Brazil had great impact on Pernambuco's social and economic life. This drought was unusually severe and municipal warehouses in the interior suffered looting and streams of migrants came from the sertão to the coast. Unfortunately, Pernambuco was initially excluded from federal aid to the Northeast.[60] At the end of Cavalcanti's rule in 1937, the continued primacy of the declining sugar economy left Pernambuco dominated by the local aristocracy with little or no improvement for the lower classes.[61] During the Vargas era an important development in Brazil was the emergence of a middle class. Unfortunately, even in the 1950s, "The middle class was practically non-existent in the economically backward regions of the country....[in] cities, such as Recife...it was difficult to identify...."[62] For the poor of Pernambuco (and the Northeast region) the path to a better life was exemplified by the migration of the family of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva—much later President of Brazil—from Pernambuco to São Paulo. The trip (over unpaved roads in the back of a truck) took 13 days. [63]

Between Vargas (1954) and Military Dictatorship (1964)

In this period only President Kubitschek served a complete term in office. All national politics remained dominated by the pro-Vargas and anti-Vargas factions.[64] Pernambuco (along with Bahia) in the middle of the Twentieth Century was one of the two leading states in the Brazilian Northeast. In that period income averaged $140 per year, per capita, consumption of electricity was about one fifth the Brazilian national average, infant mortality rates ran from 250 to 500 per 1000 live births, about three quarters of the adult population was illiterate, and fewer that 3 percent of students finished primary school.[65] Moreover, while the sugar industry in Pernambuco was recovering from the lows of the early Twentieth Century, the standard of living for the poorest sugar workers was declining.[66]

In this environment the workers began to organize and the Ligas Camponesas (peasant leagues) emerged. An attorney and member of the Braziian Socialist Party (PSB), Francisco Julião, championed the peasants' cause and the publicity surrounding the ensuing court and political struggle grew the peasant league to an estimated 40,000 members in Pernambuco.[67]

Following so closely on the Cuban revolution the peasant leagues gave rise to a U.S. CIA effort to clandestinely support moderate peasant organizations. One of the most noteworthy of these moderate organizations was the Pernambuco Rural Orientation Service (SORPE) organized by two priests, Paulo Crespo and Antonio de Melo. An outgrowth of SORPE's effort were several unions. In 1963 200,000 sugar workers in Pernambuco went on strike and won an 80% wage increase.[68]

Beginning during the Kubitchek presidency another important agent for the development of Pernambuco was the Superentendência do Desenvolvimento do Nordeste (SUDENE).[69] Under its director, noted economist Celso Furtado SUDENE set forth a three-year plan for economic development. Although the military coup of 1964 would interrupt this plan, SUDENE, and the peasant leagues, were significant elements in developing a political voice for the poor of Pernambuco.[70]

During the military governance of Brazil, 1964 to 1985

In 1964 a coup established the military as the government of Brazil. Unlike previous occasions when the military intervened and forced a change in government and then withdrew, this time a military dictatorship was established to last until 1985. While treatment of this period at the national level is beyond the scope of this article, the military governments frequently resorted to violence.[71] A succinct summary germane to Pernambuco is expressed by Alfred Stepan: "There is no doubt that, despite the high economic growth achieved...,there has been a general 'demobilization' of all mass, change-oriented movements, such as the peasant league, the land-reform and trade union movements, and the adult literacy movements.... It appears also that the lower classes have borne the brunt of the fiscal stabilization policy."[72]

Despite the "demobilization" Stepan describes, there were affects of the mass, change-oriented movements that were not undone. Moreover, along with stronger centralized government, some of the affects of the change-oriented movements undoubtedly provided a basis for both development in Pernambuco and betterment of the bulk of the population. For example, a Peace Corps worker recalls attending a meeting in rural Pernambuco in 1967. Of the thirty-five union officers attending thirteen had acquired literacy thru the Popular Culture Movement prior to the military dictatorship.[73] Moreover, some entities, considered to be more moderate were allowed to continue in a limited fashion. Significant among these was the Rural Orientation Service of Pernambuco (SORPE). SORPE identified and developed leaders among the peasants and by 1966 had established fourteen cooperatives. Of these the cooperatives located in the agreste were proving effective in assisting peasants with marketing their produce.[74] SORPE also developed the Tiriri Cooperative in the zone da mata. By 1967 not only was the cooperative producing some of the best sugar cane, but its members also produced food crops, raised live stock and were able to market fruits and vegetables.[75] This directly addressed a continuing problem with development in Pernambuco: the practice of growing only sugar cane on traditional plantations and importing food from other Brazilian states. The lack of locally sufficient food crops was a barrier to development in Pernambuco.[76]

The Opposition

Despite brutal suppression on the part of military dictators opposition arose quickly and samples of how wide spread the opposition spread is illustrated by the popular protest song Carcará, a lament for the hunger and poverty in the Northeast.[77]

Pernambuco as a locus of opposition

Hélder Câmara in 1984

"When I give food to the poor they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food they call me a communist."Archbishop Hélder Câmara

The church in Pernambuco was not the only center of resistance in the state, nor was Archbishop Hélder Câmara the only bishop in Brazil to oppose the military dictatorship, however, throughout the military rule the Catholic Church was a face of resistance[78] and Pernambuco's Archbishop Helder Camara, a leading exponent of Liberation Theology, became one of Brazil's most well known advocates for the poor and an opponent of the military dictators.[79][80] [81] Under their archbishops leadership several priests advocated for the impoverished of Pernambuco and at least one priest in Recife was tortured and murdered without government investigation in 1969.[82] Nevertheless, resistance continued. Toward the end of the military dictatorship, along with unions and squatters, the Catholic Church in Brazil participated in organizing the Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra (MST).[83] While the initial efforts of MST were in the South of Brazil, in the 1990's MST would become a force for land reform in Pernambuco.

The Ending of Military Dictatorship

Two presidents—one a newly elected military dictator, the other a future Twenty-first Century president—took noteworthy actions toward te end of the military dictatorship. Future president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, a son of Pernambuco, led a series of strikes in São Paulo.[84] The other newly elected president and dictator, João Figueiredo, declared an abertura (opening) to democracy. [85] This declaration was followed by an amnesty, elections for governors and legislative elections in 1982 and in 1985 a civilian president of Brazil was elected.[86]

Pernambuco since 1985

From To Governor of Pernambuco
1983 1986 Roberto Magalhães
1986 1987 Gustavo Krause Gonçalves Sobrinho
1987 1990 Miguel Arraes de Alencar
1990 1991 Carlos Wilson Rocha de Queirós Campos
1991 1995 Joaquim Francisco de Freitas Cavalcanti
1995 1999 Miguel Arraes de Alencar
1999 2006 Jarbas de Andrade Vasconcelos
2006 2007 Jose Mendonça Bezerra Filho
2007 2014 Eduardo Henrique Accioly Campos
2014 2015 João Soares Lyra Neto
2015 Paulo Henrique Saraiva Câmara

Over the course of the Twentieth Century various forces improved the quality of life in Pernambuco. Particularly important were advances in communication and transportation, but also the centralization of the Vargas era governments and the military dictatorship that came to have greater influence than Brazil’s centuries old regionalism. [87] Since the country pivoted away from military rule and back to democracy, it is evident that while Pernambuco was still very much a state where latifundia, monoculture, and a ruling elite controlled, nevertheless living conditions in the state have greatly improved. One measure of quality of life is infant mortality rates. In the 1970’s observers pointed to Pernambuco as part of the least developed region in the Western Hemisphere with an infant mortality rate variously described as 25 to 50%[88] or that as many as 40% of children died prior to reaching school age.[89] Statistics from the turn of the millennium show a sharp and continuing improvement. Infant mortality declined (using two different measures) by 6.8 or 6.2 percent per annum between 1990 and 2015 from (again using two measures) 77.0 or 90.4 infant deaths per 1000 live births (IDp1kLB) in 1990 to 13.4 or 18.2 IDp1kLB in 2015.[90]

Rural Life

During military rule one earlier effort to improve the lot of the rural poor, the Ligas Camponesas (peasant leagues) was suppressed[91] and another, the unions were retained to function as an instrument to oppose the peasant leagues. After the military dictatorship during the beginnings of the New Republic MST provides an example of national movement influences in rural Pernambuco. The Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem Terra (MST) was organized in 1984 in the far South of Brazil.[92] MST intentionally sought to organize as a national, not a regional basis.[93]MST began organizing in the South using land occupations and provisions of the Brazilian constitutions MST experienced considerable success. However when MST began organizing in Pernambuco the process was more difficult due to Pernambuco's historic culture. MST found that the landless poor in Pernambuco’s zona da mata (coastal areas of sugar cultivation) were amenable to organization during the 1990’s largely because during the last decades of the century the market for sugar was in severe decline. Accustomed to regular paychecks, at least when employed, sugar cane workers saw subsistence farming as disadvantageous. Regular paychecks bought food now, whereas subsistence farming produced food only at after planting, cultivation, and harvest. However, the due to the shrinking of the market for sugar that began in the 1980’s and continued through the 1990’s, MST was successful in organizing in Pernambuco and would execute land occupations especially during the decade of the 1990’s. Although, in fact, when the market for sugar revived after the turn of the millennium the now landowning peasants promptly abandoned subsistence farming and began growing sugar cane, nevertheless MST represents forces that have improved rural quality of life in Pernambuco.[94]

Urban life

The capital of Pernambuco is Recife, the largest city in Northeast Brazil and one of the largest of Brazil’s cities. It is relatively easy to find newspaper articles on Brazil and Recife in particular that discuss the contrast between the cities as tourists see them and the slums that impoverished residents live in. [95][96] Moreover, there is much scholarly documentation of the migraton to cities and the plight of the poor in Recife and other Brazilian cities.[97][98] Notwithstanding the fact that conditions in the slums are bad and much improvement is needed, taking homicides in Recife as a indicator of progress, this very fundamental indicator of quality of life shows that since the return of democracy to Brazil, quality of life has experienced some improvement. Moreover, the trend of decrease in Recife is opposite the trend in Brazil overall which has generally increased from a homicide rate of 28.5 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2002 and reached 29 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants by 2012. In 2000, the homicide rate in Recife was 97.5 per 100,000 inhabitants and Recife was said to be the most dangerous state capital in Brazil. However by 2012, this rate dropped to 52 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants, this decrease in homicides is noteworthy both for its dramatic plunge and because the rate still exceeds the national average by a significant margin.[99]

Recently

As is evidenced by the discussion in preceding sections Pernambuco has made great strides in improving the quality of life for its citizens. While true to conditions throughout the Northeast coast of Brazil Pernambuco remains an underdeveloped state in Brazil. Recent statistics from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics Foundation (IBGE) show a (prepandemic) 2019 average monthly income of 970 R$ (about US $180) up from just over 600 R$ in 2012. To put this in a purchasing power frame, in 2012 Pernambuco had 2.2 million automobiles and in 2019 the number of automobiles was increased to 3 million.[100]

See also

References

  1. "Etimologia de "Pernambuco" teria origem no português, e não no tupi, diz pesquisador da UFRPE em livro". www.ufrpe.br (in Portuguese). Retrieved March 10, 2019.
  2. "Pernambuco | state, Brazil". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved October 13, 2020.
  3. Gabriela Martin. Pré-história do Nordeste do Brasil. ISBN 9788573150834. Retrieved June 30, 2015.
  4. "Sítios arqueológicos de Pernambuco: Uma Abordagem cultural" (PDF). Unicap. Retrieved June 6, 2015.
  5. John Hemming, Red Gold: The Conquest of the Brazilian Indians, 1500-1760, Harvard University Press, 1978, pp. 72-75
  6. Francis A. Dutra, "Duarte Coelho Pereira, First Lord-Proprietor of Pernambuco: The Beginnings of a Dynasty." The Americas Vol. XXIX, April 1973, Number 4, pp. 415{em}441
  7. Robert Southey, History of Brazil Vol. 1, p. 54 (Burt Franklin, New York, 1970
  8. Stuart B.Schwartz, Sugar Plantations in the Formation of Brazilian Society: Bahia, 1550 - 1835, chapter 2 (Cambridge University Press. 1985)
  9. Pero de Magalhães Gandavo, The Histories of Brazil translated by John B Stetson, pp. 83 - 112 &165 - 174, The Cortes Society, New York, 1922
  10. John Hemming, Red Gold: The conquest of the Brazilian Indians, 1500-1760 (Harvard University Press, 1978), p. 27
  11. John Hemming, Red Gold: The conquest of the Brazilian Indians, 1500-1760 (Harvard University Press, 1978), chapter 1
  12. Bailey W. Diffie (1987). A History of Colonial Brazil: 1500 - 1792, p 1, Krieger, Malabar, Florida.
  13. Renaissance Warrior and Patron: The Reign of Francis I by R. J. Knecht p.375 (Cambridge University Press, 1996)
  14. Frei Vicente do Salvador, Historia do Brazil, Revista por Capistrano de Abreu, Rodolfo Garcia e Frei Venâncio Willeke, 6 ed. Melhormentos, São Paulo, 1974, II, pp 122-125
  15. Francis A. Dutra, "Duarte Coelho Pereira, First Lord-Proprietor of Pernambuco: The Founding of a Dynasty." The Americas Vol. XXIX, April 1973, Number 4, pp. 415-441
  16. E. Bradford Burns, Ed., A Documentary History of Brazil, Alfred Knopf, New York ,pp. 33-45
  17. Francis A. Dutra. “Duarte Coelho Pereira, First Lord-Proprietor of Pernambuco: The Beginnings of a Dynasty,” The Americas 29:4 (April 1973), pp.415-441.
  18. Francis Dutra, “Centralization vs. Donatarial Privilege” in Colonial Roots of Modern Brazil, Dauril Alden, ed., University of California Press, 1973, pp. 19-60.
  19. Noël Deerr, The History of Sugar, Chapman and Hall, London, 1949; i,p. 106
  20. C. R. Boxer, The Dutch in Brazil 1624-1654, Archon Books, 1973
  21. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 3 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 61-97
  22. Stuart B Schwartz, Sugar Plantations in the Formation of Brazilian Society: Bahia, 1550-1835 pp. 245-414
  23. C. H. Haring, Empire in Brazil: A New World Experiment with Monarchy, Norton, New York, 1958, Ch. 3
  24. C. H. Haring, Empire in Brazil: A New World Experiment with Monarchy, Norton, New York, 1958, p. 58
  25. C. H. Haring, Empire in Brazil: A New World Experiment with Monarchy, Norton, New York, 1958, Ch. 2
  26. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, Chapter 3
  27. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilian Federation, 1889-1937, Stanford University Press, 1978, p. 5
  28. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, ch. 1
  29. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, Ch.1,
  30. E. Bradford Burns,A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 75
  31. Peter Eisenberg, The Sugar Industry in Pernambuco: Modernization Without Change, 1840-1910, University of California Press, Part 2. "Social Crisis"
  32. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 124
  33. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 252
  34. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 122
  35. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 148
  36. C. H. Haring, Empire in Brazil: A New World Experiment with Monarchy, Norton, New York, 1958, p. 68
  37. Stuart B.Schwartz, Sugar Plantations in the Formation of Brazilian Society: Bahia, 1550 - 1835, Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 426&427
  38. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 188
  39. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, p. 161
  40. C. H. Haring, Empire in Brazil: A New World Experiment with Monarchy, Norton, New York, 1958, p.92
  41. Peter Eisenberg, The Sugar Industry in Pernambuco: Modernization Without Change, 1840-1910, University of California Press, ch.8
  42. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 260
  43. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 271-276
  44. Peter Eisenberg, The Sugar Industry in Pernambuco: Modernization Without Change, 1840-1910, University of California Press, Ch . 5
  45. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 197 & 198
  46. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 429
  47. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, p. 7
  48. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 2 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 200 & 201
  49. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, pp. 160-162
  50. Robert Conrad, The Destruction of Brazilian Slavery, 1850-1888, Universtity of Califonian Press, 1972, Ch. 4
  51. Peter Eisenberg, The Sugar Industry in Pernambuco: Modernization Without Change, 1840-1910, University of California Press, ch. 8
  52. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, pp. 130-131
  53. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, pp. 159-168
  54. Richard Graham, "A century of Brazilian History since 1865: Issues and Problems, A. Knopf, New York, p. 137
  55. Thomas Skidmore, Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An Experiment in Democracy, Oxford University Press,, 1967, pp. 7 & 33
  56. Thomas Skidmore, Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An Experiment in Democracy, Oxford University Press,, 1967, p. 36
  57. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, p. 86
  58. Thomas Skidmore, Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An Experiment in Democracy, Oxford University Press,, 1967, pp 28 & 29
  59. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, pp. 83-87
  60. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, p. 132-134
  61. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, p. 167
  62. Thomas Skidmore, Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An Experiment in Democracy, Oxford University Press,, 1967, p. 83
  63. John French, Lula and His Politics of Cunning, Univ. N. Carolina Press, 2020, pp. 31-34
  64. Thomas Skidmore, Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An Experiment in Democracy, Oxford University Press,, 1967, pp. 143-252
  65. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 5
  66. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 107
  67. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 111&112
  68. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 117&118
  69. Thomas Skidmore, Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An Experiment in Democracy, Oxford University Press,, 1967, p.185
  70. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 11
  71. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 3 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 445
  72. Alfred Stepan, The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil, Princeton University Press, 1971, p. 214
  73. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 116
  74. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 122
  75. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 139
  76. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, ch. 10
  77. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 3 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 454
  78. Alfred Stepan, The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil, Princeton University Press, 1971, pp. 258-9
  79. Alfred Stepan, The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil, Princeton University Press, 1971, pp. 258-9
  80. Thomas Skidmore, Politics in Brazil, 1930-1964: An Experiment in Democracy, Oxford University Press,, 1967, pp 321, 401-402
  81. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 3 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 459
  82. João Quartim, Dictatorship and Armed Struggle in Brazil, Trans. David Fernbach, Monthly Review Press, New York, 1971, p. 211
  83. Wendy Wolford, This Land Is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil, Duke Univ. Press, 2010,pp. 46-50
  84. John D. French, Lula and His Politics of Cunning, Univ. of North Carolina Press, Ch. 1
  85. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 3 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 466
  86. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 3 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 476
  87. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 3 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, 1993, p 423
  88. Kit Sims Taylor, Sugar and Underdevelopment of Northeastern Brazil 1500-1970, University Presses of Florida, p. 5
  89. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, Columbia University Press, New York, 1970, p. 350
  90. Szwarcwald, C.L., Almeida, W.d., Teixeira, R.A. et al. “Inequalities in infant mortality in Brazil at subnational levels in Brazil, 1990 to 2015.” Popul Health Metrics 18, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-020-00208-1
  91. Wendy Wolford, This Land Is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil, Duke Univ. Press, 2010, p. 128
  92. John French, Lula and His Politics of Cunning, Univ. of N. Carolina Press, 2020, p16
  93. Wendy Wolford, This Land Is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil, Duke Univ. Press, 2010, p. 4
  94. Wendy Wolford, This Land Is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil, Duke Univ. Press, 2010, pp. 211-226
  95. Evan, Williams (July 3, 2013). "Death to undesirables: Brazil's murder capital" (Internet edition). Independent. Retrieved January 27, 2021.
  96. "Popular with tourists in Brazil, Recife is deadly for residents" (Internet edition). Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. April 27, 2008. Retrieved January 27, 2021.
  97. Robert Levine, Pernambuco in the Brazilan Federation, 1889-1937, ch 1
  98. E. Bradford Burns, A History of Brazil, 3 ed. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 309, 360, 481
  99. D. Pereira, C.Mota, and M. Andresen, "The Homicide Drop in Recife, Brazil: A Study of Crime Concentrations and Spatial Patterns", Homicide Studies 2017, Vol. 21(1) 21&27.
  100. "IGBE". IGBE. IGBE. Retrieved January 28, 2021.

Further reading

  • "Local History, Brazil: Pernambuco". Catalog of the William B. Greenlee Collection of Portuguese History ... in the Newberry Library. Chicago: Newberry Library. 1953. hdl:2027/mdp.39015023946240 via Hathi Trust.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.