Executive agency

An executive agency is a part of a government department that is treated as managerially and budgetarily separate, to carry out some part of the executive functions of the United Kingdom government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government or Northern Ireland Executive. Executive agencies are "machinery of government" devices distinct both from non-ministerial government departments and non-departmental public bodies (or "quangos"), each of which enjoy a real legal and constitutional separation from ministerial control. The model was also applied in several other countries.

Size and scope

Agencies with jurisdiction over all four countries with head offices outside of London — green=state agency, orange=state-owned company (Hover mouse over pog to popup clickable link)

Agencies[1] include well-known organisations such as Her Majesty's Prison Service and the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency. The annual budget for each agency, allocated by Her Majesty's Treasury ranges from a few million pounds for the smallest agencies to £700m for the Court Service. Virtually all government departments have at least one agency.

Issues and reports

The initial success or otherwise of executive agencies was examined in the Sir Angus Fraser's Fraser Report of 1991. Its main goal was to identify what good practices had emerged from the new model and spread them to other agencies and departments. The report also recommended further powers be devolved from ministers to chief executives.

A series of reports and white papers examining governmental delivery were published throughout the 1990s, under both Conservative and Labour governments. During these the agency model became the standard model for delivering public services in the United Kingdom. By 1997 76% of civil servants were employed by an agency. The new Labour government in its first such report the 1998 Next Steps Report endorsed the model introduced by its predecessor. The most recent review (in 2002, linked below) made two central conclusions (their emphasis):

"The agency model has been a success. Since 1988 agencies have transformed the landscape of government and the responsive and effectiveness of services delivered by Government."
"Some agencies have, however, become disconnected from their departments ... The gulf between policy and delivery is considered by most to have widened."

The latter point is usually made more forcefully by Government critics, describing agencies as "unaccountable quangos".

List by department

Non-ministerial department

Other

  • HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate

Ministerial department

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Other

Civil Service

Non-ministerial department

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Tribunal non-departmental public body

Other

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Tribunal non-departmental public body

  • Valuation Tribunal for England

Public corporation

Other

Non-ministerial department

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Public corporation

Non-ministerial department

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Other

Non-ministerial department

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

  • Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment
  • Independent Agricultural Appeals Panel
  • Science Advisory Council
  • Veterinary Products Committee

Tribunal non-departmental public body

  • Plant Varieties and Seeds Tribunal

Other

Executive non-departmental public body

  • Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK

Advisory non-departmental public body

  • Independent Commission for Aid Impact

Non-ministerial department

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

  • Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee

Tribunal non-departmental public body

Public corporation

Other

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Tribunal non-departmental public body

Public corporation

Other

  • Independent Case Examiner

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Other

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Public corporation

Other

Non-ministerial department

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

  • Royal Mint Advisory Committee

Other

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Tribunal non-departmental public body

Independent monitoring body

  • Independent Anti-slavery Commissioner

Other

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Public corporation

Ad-hoc advisory group

  • Central Advisory Committee on Compensation

Other

Executive agency

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Other

Executive non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

Advisory non-departmental public body

  • Export Guarantees Advisory Council

Non ministerial departments

Not already listed above:

Other countries

Several other countries have an executive agency model.

In the United States, the Clinton administration imported the model, but with a modification of the name to "performance-based organizations."[2]

In Canada, executive agencies were adopted on a limited basis under the name "special operating agencies."[3]

Executive agencies were also established in Australia, Jamaica, Japan and Tanzania.

See also

References

  1. Cabinet Office - UK Government executive agencies (Archived Page, retrieved 29 August 2014)
  2. Roberts, Alasdair. Performance-Based Organizations: Assessing the Gore Plan. Public Administration Review, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 465-478, December 1997.
  3. Roberts, Alasdair. Public Works and Government Services: Beautiful Theory Meets Ugly Reality. HOW OTTAWA SPENDS, G. Swimmer, ed., pp. 171-203 Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1996
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.