Heteronormativity

Heteronormativity is the belief that heterosexuality is the default, preferred, or normal mode of sexual orientation.[1] It assumes the gender binary (i.e., that there are only two distinct, opposite genders) and that sexual and marital relations are most fitting between people of opposite sex. A heteronormative view therefore involves alignment of biological sex, sexuality, gender identity and gender roles. Heteronormativity is often linked to heterosexism and homophobia.[1][2] The effects of societal heteronormativity on lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals can be examined as heterosexual or "straight" privilege.[3]

Part of a series on
LGBT topics
      
lesbian ∙ gay ∙ bisexual ∙ transgender
Sexual orientation
History
Culture
Rights
Health
Social attitudes
Issues
Academic fields and discourse
LGBT portal
Part of a series on
Discrimination
General forms
Social
Religious
Ethnic/national
Manifestations
Policies
Countermeasures
Related topics

Origin of the term

Michael Warner popularized the term in 1991,[4] in one of the first major works of queer theory. The concept's roots are in Gayle Rubin's notion of the "sex/gender system" and Adrienne Rich's notion of compulsory heterosexuality.[5] From the outset, theories of heteronormativity included a critical look at gender; Warner wrote that "every person who comes to a queer self-understanding knows in one way or another that her stigmatization is intricated with gender. ... Being queer ... means being able, more or less articulately, to challenge the common understanding of what gender difference means."[4]

Discrimination

Critics of heteronormative attitudes, such as Cathy J. Cohen, Michael Warner, and Lauren Berlant, argue that they are oppressive, stigmatizing, marginalizing of perceived deviant forms of sexuality and gender, and make self-expression more challenging when that expression does not conform to the norm.[6][7] Heteronormativity describes how social institutions and policies reinforce the presumption that people are heterosexual and that gender and sex are natural binaries.[8] Heteronormative culture privileges heterosexuality as normal and natural and fosters a climate where LGBT individuals are discriminated against in marriage, tax codes, and employment.[9][7] Following Berlant and Warner, Laurie and Stark also argue that the domestic "intimate sphere" becomes "the unquestioned non-‐place that anchors heteronormative public discourses, especially those concerning marriage and adoption rights".[10]

Against gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender individuals

According to cultural anthropologist Gayle Rubin, heteronormativity in mainstream society creates a "sex hierarchy" that graduates sexual practices from morally "good sex" to "bad sex". The hierarchy places reproductive, monogamous sex between committed heterosexuals as "good" and places any sexual acts and individuals who fall short of this standard lower until they fall into "bad sex". Specifically, this places long-term committed gay couples and promiscuous gays in between the two poles.[11] Patrick McCreery, lecturer at New York University, views this hierarchy as partially explanatory for the stigmatization of gay people for socially "deviant" sexual practices that are often practiced by straight people as well, such as consumption of pornography or sex in public places.[7] There are many studies of sexual orientation discrimination on college campuses.[12]

McCreery states that this heteronormative hierarchy carries over to the workplace, where gay, lesbian and bisexual individuals face discrimination such as anti-homosexual hiring policies or workplace discrimination that often leaves "lowest hierarchy" individuals such as transsexual people vulnerable to the most overt discrimination and unable to find work.[7]

Applicants and current employees can be legally passed over or fired for being non-heterosexual or perceived as non-heterosexual in many countries, such as the case with chain restaurant Cracker Barrel, which garnered national attention in 1991 after they fired an employee for being openly lesbian, citing their policy that employees with "sexual preferences that fail to demonstrate normal heterosexual values were inconsistent with traditional American values." Workers such as the fired employee and others, such as effeminate male waiters (allegedly described as the true targets),[7] were legally fired by work policies "transgressing" against "normal" heteronormative culture.[7]

Analysing the interconnectivity of heteronormativity and sexual employment discrimination, Mustafa Bilgehan Ozturk traces the impact of patriarchal practices and institutions on the workplace experiences of lesbian, gay and bisexual employees in a variety of contexts in Turkey, demonstrating further the specific historicities and localised power/knowledge formations that give rise to physical, professional and psycho-emotive acts of prejudice against sexual minorities.[13]

In some instances, different religions have been known to promote heteronormative beliefs through their teachings.[14] According to Sociology professors Samuel Perry and Kara Snawder from University of Oklahoma, multiple research studies in the past have shown that there can be and often is a link between the religious beliefs of Americans and homophobic behavior.[15] Out of the world's five major religions Christianity, Judaism, and Islam all uphold heteronormative views on marriage.[14] Some examples of this playing out in recent years include the incident involving Kentucky clerk Kim Davis, who refused to give marriage licenses to same-sex couples on the grounds that it violated her spiritual views,[16] as well as the Supreme Court case which ruled that a Colorado baker did not have to provide a wedding cake for a gay couple based on his religion.[17]

Relation to marriage and the nuclear family

Modern family structures in the past and present vary from what was typical of the 1950s nuclear family. The families of the second half of the 19th century and early 20th century in the United States were characterized by the death of one or both parents for many American children.[18] In 1985, the United States is estimated to have been home to approximately 2.5 million post-divorce, stepfamily households containing children.[19] During the late 80s, almost 20% of families with children headed by a married couple were stepfamilies.[19]

Over the past three decades rates of divorce, single parenting, and cohabitation have risen precipitously.[20] Nontraditional families (which diverge from "a middle-class family with a bread-winning father and a stay-at-home mother, married to each other and raising their biological children") constitute the majority of families in the United States today.[20] Shared Earning/Shared Parenting Marriage (also known as Peer Marriage) where two heterosexual parents are both providers of resources and nurturers to children has become popular. Modern families may also have single-parent headed families caused by divorce, separation or death, families who have two parents who are not married but have children, or families with same-sex parents. With artificial insemination, surrogate mothers, and adoption, families do not have to be formed by the heteronormative biological union of a male and a female.

The consequences of these changes for the adults and children involved are heavily debated. In a 2009 Massachusetts spousal benefits case, developmental psychologist Michael Lamb testified that parental sexual orientation does not negatively affect childhood development. "Since the end of the 1980s... it has been well established that children and adolescents can adjust just as well in nontraditional settings as in traditional settings," he argued.[21] However, columnist Maggie Gallagher argues that heteronormative social structures are beneficial to society because they are optimal for the raising of children.[22] Australian-Canadian ethicist Margaret Somerville argues that "giving same-sex couples the right to found a family unlinks parenthood from biology".[23] Recent criticisms of this argument have been made by Timothy Laurie, who argues that both intersex conditions and infertility rates have always complicated links between biology, marriage and child-rearing.[24]

A subset of heteronormativity is the concept of heteronormative temporality. This ideology states that the ultimate life goal for society is heterosexual marriage. Societal factors influence adults to search for a partner of the opposite sex to engage in heterosexual marriage with the goal of having children through the traditional nuclear family structure. Heteronormative temporality promotes abstinence only until marriage. Many American parents adhere to this heteronormative narrative, and teach their children accordingly. According to Amy T. Schalet, it seems that the bulk of parent-child sex education revolves around abstinence only practices in the United States, but this differs in other parts of the world.[25] Similarly, George Washington University Professor Abby Wilkerson discusses the ways in which the healthcare and medicinal industries reinforce the views of heterosexual marriage in order to promote heteronormative temporality. The concept of heteronormative temporality extends beyond heterosexual marriage to include a pervasive system where heterosexuality is seen as a standard, and anything outside of that realm is not tolerated. Wilkerson explains that it dictates aspects of everyday life such as nutritional health, socio-economic status, personal beliefs, and traditional gender roles.[26]

Transgressions

Intersex people
Main articles: Intersex human rights and Intersex medical interventions

Intersex people have biological characteristics that are ambiguously either male or female. If such a condition is detected, intersex people in most present-day societies are almost always assigned a normative sex shortly after birth.[27] Surgery (usually involving modification to the genitalia) is often performed in an attempt to produce an unambiguously male or female body, with the parents'—rather than the individual's—consent.[28] The child is then usually raised and enculturated as a cisgender heterosexual member of the assigned sex, which may or may not match their emergent gender identity throughout life or some remaining sex characteristics (for example, chromosomes, genes or internal sex organs).[29]

Transgender people

Transgender people experience a mismatch between their gender identity and their assigned sex.[30][31][32] Transgender is also an umbrella term because, in addition to including trans men and trans women whose binary gender identity is the opposite of their assigned sex (and who are sometimes specifically termed transsexual if they desire medical assistance to transition), it may include genderqueer people (whose identities are not exclusively masculine or feminine, but may, for example, be bigender, pangender, genderfluid, or agender).[31][33][34] Other definitions include third-gender people as transgender or conceptualize transgender people as a third gender,[35][36] and infrequently the term is defined very broadly to include cross-dressers.[37]

Some transgender people seek sex reassignment therapy, and may not behave according to the gender role imposed by society. Some societies consider transgender behavior a crime worthy of capital punishment, including Saudi Arabia[38] and many other nations. In some cases, gay or lesbian people were forced to undergo sex change treatments to "fix" their sex or gender: in some European countries during the 20th century,[39][40] and in South Africa in the 1970s and 1980s.[41]

In some countries, including North American[42] and European countries, certain forms of violence against transgender people may be tacitly endorsed when prosecutors and juries refuse to investigate, prosecute, or convict those who perform the murders and beatings.[42][43][44] Other societies have considered transgender behavior as a psychiatric illness serious enough to justify institutionalization.[45]

In medical communities with these restrictions, patients have the option of either suppressing transsexual behavior and conforming to the norms of their birth sex (which may be necessary to avoid social stigma or even violence) or by adhering strictly to the norms of their "new" sex in order to qualify for sex reassignment surgery and hormonal treatments. Attempts to achieve an ambiguous or "alternative" gender identity would not be supported or allowed.[46] Sometimes sex reassignment surgery is a requirement for an official gender change, and often "male" and "female" are the only choices available, even for intersex and transgender people.[47] For governments which allow only heterosexual marriages, official gender changes can have implications for related rights and privileges, such as child custody, inheritance, and medical decision-making.[46]

Homonormativity
Main article: Homonormativity

Homonormativity is a term which can refer to the privileging of homosexuality[48] or the assimilation of heteronormative ideals and constructs into LGBTQ culture and individual identity.[49] Specifically, Catherine Connell states that homonormativity "emphasizes commonality with the norms of heterosexual culture, including marriage, monogamy, procreation, and productivity".[50][51] The term is almost always used in its latter sense, and was used prominently by Lisa Duggan in 2003,[52] although transgender studies scholar Susan Stryker, in her article "Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinary",[53] noted that it was also used by transgender activists in the 1990s in reference to the imposition of gay/lesbian norms over the concerns of transgender people.[53][54] Transgender people were not included in healthcare programs combating the AIDS epidemic, and were often excluded from gay/ lesbian demonstrations in Washington.[55] Homonormativity has also grown to include transnormativity, or "the pressure put on trans people to conform to traditional, oppositional sexist understandings of gender".[56] In addition, homonormativity can be used today to cover or erase the radical politics of the queer community during the Gay Liberation Movement,[50][57] by not only replacing these politics with more conservative goals like marriage equality and adoption rights, but also commercializing and mainstreaming queer subcultures.[56][58]

According to Penny Griffin, Politics and International Relations lecturer at the University of New South Wales, homonormativity upholds neoliberalism rather than critiquing monogamy, procreation, and binary gender roles as inherently heterosexist and racist.[59] In this sense, homonormativity is deeply intertwined with the expansion and maintenance of the internationally structured and structuring capitalistic worldwide system.[60] Duggan asserts that homonormativity fragments LGBT communities into hierarchies of worthiness, and that LGBT people that come the closest to mimicking heteronormative standards of gender identity are deemed most worthy of receiving rights. She also states that LGBT individuals at the bottom of this hierarchy (e.g. bisexual people, trans people, non-binary people, people of non-Western genders, intersex people, queers of color, queer sex workers) are seen as an impediment to this class of homonormative individuals receiving their rights.[52][50][61] For example, one empirical study found that in the Netherlands, transgender people and other gender non-conforming LGBT people are often looked down upon within their communities for not acting "normal." Those who do assimilate often become invisible in society and experience constant fear and shame about the non-conformers within their communities.[62] Stryker referenced theorist Jürgen Habermas and his view of the public sphere allowing for individuals to come together, as a group, to discuss diverse ideologies and by excluding the non-conforming LGBTQ community, society as a whole were undoubtedly excluding the gender-variant individuals from civic participation.[53]

Media representation

Five different studies have shown that gay characters appearing on TV decreases the prejudice among viewers.[63] Cable and streaming services are beginning to include more characters who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender than broadcast television.[64] Cable and streaming services are lacking in diversity, according to a GLAAD report, with many of the LGBT characters being gay men (41% and 39% respectively).[64] The total number of LGBT characters counted on cable was reported to be 31% up from 2015, and bisexual representations saw an almost twofold increase.[64]

Intersex people are excluded almost completely from television, though about 1% of the population is intersex.[65] News medias outline what it means to be male or female, which causes a gap for anyone who doesn't fall into those two categories.[65] Newspapers have covered the topic of intersex athletes with the case of Caster Semenya, where news spread on sporting officials having to determine whether she was to be considered female or male.[66]

Those who do not identify as either woman or man are gender non-binary, or gender non-conforming.[67] States in the United States are increasingly legalizing this “third” gender on official government documents as the existence of this identity is continuously debated among individuals.[68] The controversy has resulted in minimal representation in the media, but recent television shows that have featured non-binary individuals include Ru Paul's Drag Race and The Fosters.[69] Members of the LGBTQ community claim that representation in media of non-binary people has not expanded to the extent of gender-conforming transgenders.[70]

In today's media, specifically television, heterosexual character are used more often than homosexual characters. In 2018 only 8.8% of broadcast television has a LGBTQ person on the show.[71] Media portrays heterosexuality as “normal” in today's society so we see less homosexuality on television because of this.[72] There are many stereotypes that come with this, as it can be seen in advertising, newspapers, radio, and television. For example, mainstream media promote the idea that gay men are more likely to be attracted to advertisements that sell expensive, flamboyant, and possibly feminine products because of their assumed attitudes and way of life.[73] Homosexuals and heterosexuals are also differentiated in the movies as well. Homosexual characters are predominantly seen in movies with issues regarding sexuality and the character is presented as homosexual.[74] Television shows are also another aspect of media where there are stereotypes and negatively represented homosexuals. For example, the TV show Modern Family has two gay characters that are married and have a small adopted child together. Some may see this relationship as degrading and stereotypical of how the mainstream media views homosexuals. The show's sexual politics are considered fake because of how their relationship is portrayed as overly colorful and excessively put together.[75]

More LGBT content was produced in the media in 2018.[76] According to GLAAD’S Annual Where We Are on TV Report, which records LGBTQ+ representation on television, the number of queer characters on TV shows rose 8.8%.[77] Queer people of color also saw an increase in screen time; they outnumbered white queer people on television for the first time in the reports history.[76]

See also

References
  1. Harris J, White V (2018). A Dictionary of Social Work and Social Care. Oxford University Press. p. 335. ISBN 978-0192516862. Retrieved August 19, 2018.
  2. Goodman RD, Gorski PC (2014). Decolonizing "Multicultural" Counseling through Social Justice. Springer. pp. 28–30. ISBN 978-1493912834. Retrieved August 19, 2018.
  3. Williford, Beth. "Heterosexual privilege". Encyclopedia of Gender and Society.
  4. Warner, Michael (1991), "Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet". Social Text; 9 (4 [29]): 3–17
  5. Adrienne Rich, 'Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence' Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5:631-60, 1980.
  6. Lovaas, Karen, and Mercilee M. Jenkins. "Charting a Path through the 'Desert of Nothing.'" Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader. 8 July 2006. Sage Publications Inc. 5 May 2008
  7. Krupat, Kitty (2001). Out at Work: Building a Gay-Labor Alliance. U of Minnesota Press. p. 268. ISBN 978-0-8166-3741-6.
  8. DeFrancisco, Victoria (2014). Gender in Communication. U.S.A: SAGE Publication, Inc. p. 16. ISBN 978-1-4522-2009-3.
  9. Meyer, Doug (2015). Violence against Queer People. Rutgers University Press.
  10. Laurie, Timothy; Stark, Hannah (2012), "Reconsidering Kinship: Beyond the Nuclear Family With Deleuze and Guattari", Cultural Studies Review, 18 (1): 19–39, doi:10.5130/csr.v18i1.1612
  11. Rubin, Gayle (1993). "Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality". In Vance, Carole (ed.). Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality.
  12. Byron, Reginald; Lowe, Maria; Billingsley, Brianna; Tuttle, Nathan (2017). "Performativity Double Standards and the Sexual Orientation Climate at a Southern Liberal Arts University". Journal of Homosexuality. 64 (5): 671–696. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1196994. PMID 27267937.
  13. Ozturk, Mustafa Bilgehan (August 2011). "Sexual Orientation Discrimination: Exploring the Experiences of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Employees in Turkey". Human Relations. 64 (8): 1099–1118. doi:10.1177/0018726710396249.
  14. "Homosexuality and Religion | SexInfo Online". www.soc.ucsb.edu. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  15. Perry, Samuel; Snawder, Kara (March 21, 2019). "Longitudinal effects of religious media on opposition to same-sex marriage". ebscohost.com. University of Oklahoma Department of Sociology.
  16. Blinder, Alan; Lewin, Tamar (2015-09-03). "Clerk in Kentucky Chooses Jail Over Deal on Same-Sex Marriage". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  17. "Masterpiece Cake Shop, LTD v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission" (PDF). supremecourt.gov. Supreme Court of the United States. March 21, 2019.
  18. Coontz, S. (1992)
  19. Coleman, M.; Ganong, L. H.; Goodwin, C. (1994). "The presentation of stepfamilies in marriage and family textbooks: A reexamination". Family Relations. 45 (3): 289–297. doi:10.2307/585420. JSTOR 585420.
  20. Benfer, Amy. The Nuclear Family Takes a Hit Archived 2008-05-22 at the Wayback Machine, Salon.com. June 7, 2001
  21. Michael Lamb, Ph.D.: Affidavit – United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (2009)
  22. Maggie Gallagher (2003-09-04). "Why Marriage Matters: The Case for Normal Marriage. Testimony before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Property Rights Hearing: "What is needed to defend the Bipartisan Defense of Marriage Act of 1996?"" (PDF). Institute for Marriage and Public Policy. Retrieved 2012-05-22.
  23. Margaret Somerville – In Conversation Archived 2008-12-05 at the Wayback Machine
  24. Laurie, Timothy (2015). "Bigotry or Biology: The Hard Choice for an Opponent of Marriage Equality". The Drum.
  25. Schalet, Amy T. Not under My Roof: Parents, Teens, and the Culture of Sex. Chicago: U of Chicago, 2011. ISBN 9780226736181
  26. Wilkerson, Abby (2013). "I want to hold your hand: abstinence curricula, bioethics, and the silencing of desire". Journal of Medical Humanities. 34 (2): 101–8. doi:10.1007/s10912-013-9213-0. PMID 23468394.
  27. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
  28. Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
  29. Wilchins, Riki. 2002. 'A certain kind of freedom: power and the truth of bodies – four essays on gender.' In GenderQueer: Voices from beyond the sexual binary. Los Angeles: Alyson Books 23–66.
  30. Stroud District Council "Gender Equality SCHEME AND ACTION PLAN 2007" Archived 2008-02-27 at the Wayback Machine, defines the state of being transgender as "Non-identification with, or non-presentation as, the sex (and assumed gender) one was assigned at birth."
  31. Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. "GLAAD Media Reference Guide – Transgender glossary of terms", "GLAAD", USA, May 2010. Retrieved on 2011-02-24. "An umbrella term for people whose gender identity and/or gender expression differs from what is typically associated with the sex they were assigned at birth."
  32. "USI LGBT Campaign – Transgender Campaign" (retrieved 11 January 2012) defines transgender people as "People who were assigned a sex, usually at birth and based on their genitals, but who feel that this is a false or incomplete description of themselves."
  33. B Bilodeau, Beyond the gender binary: A case study of two transgender students at a Midwestern research university, in the Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education (2005): "Yet Jordan and Nick represent a segment of transgender communities that have largely been overlooked in transgender and student development research – individuals who express a non-binary construction of gender[.]"
  34. "Layton, Lynne. In Defense of Gender Ambiguity: Jessica Benjamin. Gender & Psychoanalysis. I, 1996. Pp. 27–43". Retrieved 2007-03-06
  35. Susan Stryker, Stephen Whittle, The Transgender Studies Reader (ISBN 1-135-39884-4), page 666: "The authors note that, increasingly, in social science literature, the term “third gender” is being replaced by or conflated with the newer term “transgender.”
  36. Joan C. Chrisler, Donald R. McCreary, Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, volume 1 (2010, ISBN 1-4419-1465-X), page 486: "Transgender is a broad term characterized by a challenge of traditional gender roles and gender identity[. …] For example, some cultures classify transgender individuals as a third gender, thereby treating this phenomenon as normative."
  37. Sari L. Reisner, Kerith Conron, Matthew J. Mimiaga, Sebastien Haneuse, et al, Comparing in-person and online survey respondents in the US National Transgender Discrimination Survey: implications for transgender health research, in LGBT Health, June 2014, 1(2): 98-106. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2013.0018: "Transgender was defined broadly to cover those who transition from one gender to another as well as those who may not choose to socially, medically, or legally fully transition, including cross-dressers, people who consider themselves to be genderqueer, androgynous, and ..."
  38. Saudis Arrest 5 Pakistani TGs
  39. The Unkindest Cut | The science and ethics of castration
  40. Turing, Alan (1912–1954) Archived 2009-09-01 at the Wayback Machine
  41. Gays tell of mutilation by apartheid army
  42. Frye, Phyllis (Fall 2000). "The International Bill of Gender Rights vs. The Cide House Rules: Transgender people struggle with the courts over what clothing they are allowed to wear on the job, which restroom they are allowed to use on the job, their right to marry, and the very definition of their sex". William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law. 7: 139–145.
  43. "OUTfront! Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgendered Human Rights:"Battybwoys affi dead" Action against homophobia in Jamaica". AmnestyUSA.org. May 7, 2004. Archived from the original on 2 June 2010. Retrieved 4 June 2010.
  44. "SPLCenter.org: 'Disposable People'". Archived from the original on 2014-07-11. Retrieved 2004-06-10.
  45. "The Medicalization of Transgenderism - Trans Health". Trans Health. 2001-07-18. Retrieved 2017-02-05.
  46. Weiss, Jillian Todd (2001). "The Gender Caste System: Identity, Privacy and Heteronormativity" (PDF). Law & Sexuality. Tulane Law School. 10: 123–186. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-06-21. Retrieved 2007-02-25.
  47. Tranter, Chi (March 18, 2010). "Norrie's 'ungendered' status withdrawn". Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 2010-03-22.
  48. David Orzechowitz (2010). "Gender, Sexuality, Culture and the Closet in Theme Park Parades". In Christine L. Williams; Kirsten Dellinger (eds.). Gender and Sexuality in the Workplace. Emerald Group. p. 241. ISBN 978-1-8485-5371-2. The dominance of a homonormative culture in Parades subordinates male heterosexuality to male homosexuality.
  49. "Homonormativity". web.uvic.ca. Positive Space Network. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  50. Connell, Catherine. School's Out : Gay and Lesbian Teachers in the Classroom (1). Berkeley, US: University of California Press, 2014. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.
  51. Queer Twin Cities. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.
  52. Duggan, Lisa. The Twilight of Equality?: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack On Democracy. Beacon Press, 2003.
  53. Stryker, Susan (1 January 2008). "Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity". Radical History Review. 2008 (100): 145–157. doi:10.1215/01636545-2007-026.
  54. Cover, Rob. Queer Youth Suicide, Culture and Identity : Unliveable Lives?. Farnham, GB: Routledge, 2012. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 15 March 2017.
  55. Stryker, Susan. Transgender History. First Printing edition. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press, 2008.
  56. Lewis, Holly (2016). The Politics of Everybody. London: Zed Books Ltd. pp. 222–230. ISBN 978-1-78360-287-2.
  57. Duggan, Lisa. "The New Homonormativity: The Sexual Politics of Neoliberalism." Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics. Ed. Dana D. Nelson and Russ Castronovo. N.p.: n.p., 2002. 175-94. Print. New Americanists.
  58. Alderson, David (2016). Sex, Needs and Queer Culture. London: Zed Books Ltd. ISBN 978-1-78360-512-5.
  59. Griffin, Penny (2007). "Sexing the Economy in a Neo-liberal World Order: Neo-liberal Discourse and the (Re)Production of Heteronormative Heterosexuality". British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 9 (2): 220–238. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00280.x.
  60. Stryker, Susan (2008). "Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity". Radical Review History. 2008 (100): 145–157. doi:10.1215/01636545-2007-026 – via Radical History Review.
  61. Ferguson, Roderick A. (2005). "Race-ing Homonormativity: Citizenship, Sociology, and Gay Identity". In E. Patrick Johnson; Mae G. Henderson (eds.). Black Queer Studies: A Critical Anthology. Duke University Press. pp. 52–67. doi:10.1215/9780822387220. ISBN 978-0-8223-8722-0.
  62. Robinson, Brandon Andrew (2012). "Is This What Equality Looks Like?: How Assimilation Marginalizes the Dutch LGBT Community". Sexuality Research & Social Policy. 9 (4): 327–336. doi:10.1007/s13178-012-0084-3.
  63. Stelter, Brian (2012-05-08). "Gay on TV: It's All in the Family". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-12-12.
  64. Egner, Jeremy (2015-10-27). "More Gay and Transgender Characters Are on TV, Report Shows". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-12-12.
  65. Kerry, Stephen (2011), ‘Representation of intersex in news media: the case of Kathleen Worrall’, Journal of Gender Studies, 20 (3), 263-77.
  66. Busari, Stephanie. "Gender row athlete: What is intersexuality?". edition.cnn.com. Retrieved 2016-12-12.
  67. Vijlbrief, Afiah; Saharso, Sawitri; Ghorashi, Halleh (2020-01-02). "Transcending the gender binary: Gender non-binary young adults in Amsterdam". Journal of LGBT Youth. 17 (1): 89–106. doi:10.1080/19361653.2019.1660295. ISSN 1936-1653.
  68. Harmon, Amy (2019-05-29). "Which Box Do You Check? Some States Are Offering a Nonbinary Option". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-04-07.
  69. Higley, Diana (2019). Bending the Binary: Effects of Nonbinary Gender Media Representations on Disposition Formation and Media Enjoyment. Electronic Theses and Dissertations (M.A. thesis). University of Central Florida – via STARS. Abstract
  70. "Gender Isn't A Haircut: How Representation of Nonbinary People of Color Requires More Than White Androgyny". EFNIKS.com. Retrieved 2020-04-07.
  71. "GLAAD", The SAGE Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies, SAGE Publications, Inc., 2016, doi:10.4135/9781483371283.n173, ISBN 9781483371306
  72. Ott, Matt, Brian L., Robert L (2014). Critical Media Studies: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. pp. 216–222. ISBN 978-1-118-55397-8.
  73. Kates, Steven M. (March 1999). "Making the Ad Perfectly Queer: Marketing "Normality" to the Gay Men's Community?". Journal of Advertising. 28 (1): 25–37. doi:10.1080/00913367.1999.10673574. ISSN 0091-3367.
  74. "America on film: representing race, class, gender, and sexuality at the movies". Choice Reviews Online. 46 (12): 46–6690–46–6690. 2009-08-01. doi:10.5860/choice.46-6690. ISSN 0009-4978.
  75. PUGH, TISON (2018), "Conservative Narratology, Queer Politics, and the Humor of Gay Stereotypes in Modern Family", The Queer Fantasies of the American Family Sitcom, Rutgers University Press: 161–189, doi:10.2307/j.ctt1trkkgj.9, ISBN 9780813591728
  76. Liao, Shannon (2018-10-26). "2018 saw record growth in LGBTQ roles on television". The Verge. Retrieved 2019-03-21.
  77. "Where We Are on TV Report - 2018". GLAAD. 2018-10-23. Retrieved 2019-03-21.

Bibliography
  • Dreyer, Yolanda. "Hegemony and the Internalisation of Homophobia Caused by Heteronormativity." Department of Practical Theology. 2007. University of Pretoria.5 May 2008 .
  • Gray, Brandon."'Brokeback Mountain' most impressive of Tepid 2005."Box Office Mojo, LLC. 25 February 2006. 7 May 2008. .
  • Lovaas, Karen, and Mercilee M. Jenkins. "Charting a Path through the 'Desert of Nothing.'" Sexualities and Communication in Everyday Life: A Reader. 8 July 2006. Sage Publications Inc. 5 May 2008 .
  • Peele, Thomas. Composition Studies, Heteronormativity, and Popular Culture. 2001 Boise State University. 5 May 2008. .
  • The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. "U.S. Religious Landscape Survey." 7 May 2008. 7 May 2008. .

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.