1928 United States presidential election in Oregon
The 1928 United States presidential election in Oregon took place on November 6, 1928, as part of the 1928 United States presidential election. Voters chose five representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
County Results
Hoover 50-60% 60-70% 70-80%
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elections in Oregon |
---|
Background
Outside a few Presidential and gubernatorial elections like that of 1922 influenced by the Ku Klux Klan, Oregon was a virtually one-party Republican state during the “System of 1896”,[1] where the only competition was via Republican primaries.[2] Apart from Woodrow Wilson’s two elections, during the first of which the GOP was severely divided, no Democrat since William Jennings Bryan in 1900 had carried a single county in the state.
In 1924 Oregon had nonetheless been the fifth-strongest of the fifteen Western and Plains States for Democrat John W. Davis behind Ozark mountaineer-dominated Nebraska, Mormon Utah and southern-leaning New Mexico and Arizona. Moreover, although maverick Wisconsin Senator Robert M. La Follette Sr. fared less well than in the other Pacific States, he still gained nearly one in four of Oregon's ballots as an independent. However, when La Follette died in 1925 his family endorsed New York City Catholic Democrat Al Smith,[3] towards whose faith Oregon's largely Puritan (in the northwest) or Ozark Methodist (in the south and east), Anglo-Saxon[4] and fiercely anti-Catholic populace was strongly hostile.[5] This had been seen in a notorious law outlawing private religious schools under Klan-supported Governor Walter M. Pierce, whose decision was viewed unconstitutional by both the Oregon Supreme Court in 1924 and federally in Pierce v. Society of Sisters a year later.[6]
Despite this severe wariness,[7] Smith did manage to win the state's Democratic presidential primary against token opposition from Missouri Senator James Reed[8] and Montana Senator Thomas Walsh, whilst Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover won the state's Republican primary unopposed with over six times as many voters.[9] From the beginning polls showed opposition to Smith's Catholicism and anti-Prohibition views as very strong in Oregon,[10] and neither major party would campaign in the state during the fall. October polls showed Hoover winning the state by a two-to-one margin and Smith gaining no more than a quarter of the La Follette vote.[11]
Vote
Whereas in more Catholic states of the northern “Frost Belt” like Wisconsin, North Dakota and Minnesota Smith was able to revive a moribund Democratic Party at a Presidential level,[12] Oregon's smaller but still significant La Follette electorate concentrated in the lower Willamette Valley and arch-isolationist Southern Oregon balked at voting for a Catholic.[13] Consequently, Republican nominee Hoover was able to gain 13.17 percent upon Calvin Coolidge’s 1924 performance in the Beaver State and become the fifth Republican in seven presidential elections to sweep all Oregon’s counties.
This would be the last occasion until Donald Trump in 2016 that Columbia County voted for a Republican Presidential candidate.[14][15]
Results
Presidential Candidate | Running Mate | Party | Electoral Vote (EV) | Popular Vote (PV) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Herbert Hoover of California | Charles Curtis | Republican | 5[16] | 205,341 | 64.18% |
Al Smith | Joseph T. Robinson | Democratic | 0 | 109,223 | 34.14% |
Norman Thomas | James Maurer | Socialist Principles Independent | 0 | 2,720 | 0.85% |
Verne L. Reynolds | Jeremiah Crowley | Socialist Labor | 0 | 1,564 | 0.49% |
William Z. Foster | Benjamin Gitlow | Independent | 0 | 1,094 | 0.34% |
Results by county
County | Herbert Clark Hoover Republican |
Alfred Emmanuel Smith Democratic |
Norman Mattoon Thomas Socialist Principles Independent |
Verne L. Reynolds Socialist Labor |
William Z. Foster Independent |
Margin | Total votes cast[17] | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
Baker | 3,721 | 65.52% | 1,861 | 32.77% | 64 | 1.13% | 22 | 0.39% | 11 | 0.19% | 1,860 | 32.75% | 5,679 |
Benton | 4,605 | 75.55% | 1,412 | 23.17% | 37 | 0.61% | 17 | 0.28% | 24 | 0.39% | 3,193 | 52.39% | 6,095 |
Clackamas | 9,216 | 59.51% | 5,918 | 38.22% | 157 | 1.01% | 130 | 0.84% | 65 | 0.42% | 3,298 | 21.30% | 15,486 |
Clatsop | 4,087 | 63.33% | 2,208 | 34.21% | 31 | 0.48% | 37 | 0.57% | 91 | 1.41% | 1,879 | 29.11% | 6,454 |
Columbia | 3,519 | 65.21% | 1,775 | 32.89% | 34 | 0.63% | 44 | 0.82% | 24 | 0.44% | 1,744 | 32.32% | 5,396 |
Coos | 4,929 | 60.66% | 3,040 | 37.41% | 62 | 0.76% | 67 | 0.82% | 28 | 0.34% | 1,889 | 23.25% | 8,126 |
Crook | 877 | 63.46% | 487 | 35.24% | 10 | 0.72% | 4 | 0.29% | 4 | 0.29% | 390 | 28.22% | 1,382 |
Curry | 694 | 59.16% | 453 | 38.62% | 14 | 1.19% | 4 | 0.34% | 8 | 0.68% | 241 | 20.55% | 1,173 |
Deschutes | 2,815 | 60.83% | 1,702 | 36.78% | 29 | 0.63% | 77 | 1.66% | 5 | 0.11% | 1,113 | 24.05% | 4,628 |
Douglas | 5,609 | 70.52% | 2,191 | 27.55% | 51 | 0.64% | 55 | 0.69% | 48 | 0.60% | 3,418 | 42.97% | 7,954 |
Gilliam | 880 | 62.50% | 515 | 36.58% | 6 | 0.43% | 2 | 0.14% | 5 | 0.36% | 365 | 25.92% | 1,408 |
Grant | 1,411 | 74.03% | 469 | 24.61% | 13 | 0.68% | 10 | 0.52% | 3 | 0.16% | 942 | 49.42% | 1,906 |
Harney | 952 | 60.60% | 600 | 38.19% | 8 | 0.51% | 6 | 0.38% | 5 | 0.32% | 352 | 22.41% | 1,571 |
Hood River | 1,806 | 65.22% | 905 | 32.68% | 18 | 0.65% | 15 | 0.54% | 25 | 0.90% | 901 | 32.54% | 2,769 |
Jackson | 8,053 | 75.43% | 2,463 | 23.07% | 88 | 0.82% | 41 | 0.38% | 31 | 0.29% | 5,590 | 52.36% | 10,676 |
Jefferson | 481 | 59.31% | 308 | 37.98% | 6 | 0.74% | 8 | 0.99% | 8 | 0.99% | 173 | 21.33% | 811 |
Josephine | 2,625 | 71.31% | 959 | 26.05% | 44 | 1.20% | 36 | 0.98% | 17 | 0.46% | 1,666 | 45.26% | 3,681 |
Klamath | 4,453 | 61.28% | 2,721 | 37.44% | 32 | 0.44% | 31 | 0.43% | 30 | 0.41% | 1,732 | 23.83% | 7,267 |
Lake | 1,014 | 63.61% | 549 | 34.44% | 10 | 0.63% | 9 | 0.56% | 12 | 0.75% | 465 | 29.17% | 1,594 |
Lane | 13,647 | 74.96% | 4,213 | 23.14% | 179 | 0.98% | 93 | 0.51% | 73 | 0.40% | 9,434 | 51.82% | 18,205 |
Lincoln | 2,100 | 57.33% | 1,464 | 39.97% | 46 | 1.26% | 32 | 0.87% | 21 | 0.57% | 636 | 17.36% | 3,663 |
Linn | 5,877 | 67.62% | 2,645 | 30.43% | 72 | 0.83% | 45 | 0.52% | 52 | 0.60% | 3,232 | 37.19% | 8,691 |
Malheur | 2,164 | 67.35% | 1,016 | 31.62% | 18 | 0.56% | 11 | 0.34% | 4 | 0.12% | 1,148 | 35.73% | 3,213 |
Marion | 11,754 | 61.96% | 6,998 | 36.89% | 102 | 0.54% | 69 | 0.36% | 48 | 0.25% | 4,756 | 25.07% | 18,971 |
Morrow | 1,093 | 64.87% | 543 | 32.23% | 23 | 1.36% | 14 | 0.83% | 12 | 0.71% | 550 | 32.64% | 1,685 |
Multnomah | 75,731 | 61.64% | 45,177 | 36.77% | 1,219 | 0.99% | 447 | 0.36% | 285 | 0.23% | 30,554 | 24.87% | 122,859 |
Polk | 3,244 | 64.44% | 1,724 | 34.25% | 30 | 0.60% | 20 | 0.40% | 16 | 0.32% | 1,520 | 30.19% | 5,034 |
Sherman | 759 | 66.35% | 375 | 32.78% | 2 | 0.17% | 5 | 0.44% | 3 | 0.26% | 384 | 33.57% | 1,144 |
Tillamook | 2,570 | 66.75% | 1,204 | 31.27% | 32 | 0.83% | 28 | 0.73% | 16 | 0.42% | 1,366 | 35.48% | 3,850 |
Umatilla | 5,277 | 67.83% | 2,390 | 30.72% | 59 | 0.76% | 34 | 0.44% | 20 | 0.26% | 2,887 | 37.11% | 7,780 |
Union | 3,219 | 59.13% | 2,154 | 39.57% | 26 | 0.48% | 30 | 0.55% | 15 | 0.28% | 1,065 | 19.56% | 5,444 |
Wallowa | 1,326 | 56.86% | 935 | 40.09% | 39 | 1.67% | 19 | 0.81% | 13 | 0.56% | 391 | 16.77% | 2,332 |
Wasco | 2,746 | 60.85% | 1,699 | 37.65% | 30 | 0.66% | 21 | 0.47% | 17 | 0.38% | 1,047 | 23.20% | 4,513 |
Washington | 6,162 | 62.37% | 3,544 | 35.87% | 91 | 0.92% | 55 | 0.56% | 27 | 0.27% | 2,618 | 26.50% | 9,879 |
Wheeler | 677 | 75.06% | 224 | 24.83% | 1 | 0.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 453 | 50.22% | 902 |
Yamhill | 5,248 | 67.97% | 2,382 | 30.85% | 38 | 0.49% | 25 | 0.32% | 28 | 0.36% | 2,866 | 37.12% | 7,721 |
Totals | 205,341 | 64.18% | 109,223 | 34.14% | 2,720 | 0.85% | 1,564 | 0.49% | 1,094 | 0.34% | 96,118 | 30.04% | 319,942 |
References
- Burnham, Walter Dean; ‘The System of 1896’, in Kleppner, Paul (editor), The Evolution of American Electoral Systems, pp. 176-179 ISBN 0313213798
- Murray, Keith; ‘Issues and Personalities of Pacific Northwest Politics, 1889-1950’, The Pacific Northwest Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 3 (July 1950), pp. 213-233
- Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, p. 59 ISBN 0786422173
- Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 482 ISBN 978-0-691-16324-6
- Allerfeldt, Kristofer; Race, Radicalism, Religion, and Restriction: Immigration in the Pacific Northwest, 1890-1924, pp. 59-62 ISBN 9786612340130
- Fox, Robert A. and Buchanan, Nina K. (editors); The Wiley Handbook of School Choice
- Lyon, william C.; ‘Smith Is Favoured in the Northwest’;
- ‘Smith Retains Lead Over Walsh in Oregon’; New York Times, 19 May, 1928, p. 3
- Wood, T.R. ‘Explaining the Smith Vote: Republican Swing to Governor May Not Outnumber Hoover Democrats’, Letter to The New York Times, May 23, 1928
- ‘Found Hoover Strong: Brooklyn Republican Reports Opposition to Smith in West’; New York Times, July 27, 1928, p. 2
- ‘Digest Poll Gives Hoover 44 States’; New York Times, October 19, 1928, p. 4
- Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 426
- Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 486
- Wheel, Robert. "The 2016 Streak Breakers". Center for Politics. Larry J. Sabato’s Crystal Ball. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
- "1928 Presidential General Election Results – Oregon". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas. Retrieved 23 December 2013.
- Our Campaigns; OR US Presidential Election Race, November 06, 1928