2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin

The 2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin was held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, as part of the 2020 United States elections in which all 50 states plus the District of Columbia participated.[1] Wisconsin voters chose electors to represent them in the Electoral College via a popular vote, pitting the Republican Party's nominee, incumbent President Donald Trump, and running mate Vice President Mike Pence against Democratic Party nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden, and his running mate California Senator Kamala Harris. Wisconsin has 10 electoral votes in the Electoral College.[2]

2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin

November 3, 2020
Turnout72.3%
 
Nominee Joe Biden Donald Trump
Party Democratic Republican
Home state Delaware Florida
Running mate Kamala Harris Mike Pence
Electoral vote 10 0
Popular vote 1,630,866 1,610,184
Percentage 49.45% 48.82%

County results

President before election

Donald Trump
Republican

Elected President

Joe Biden
Democratic

The 2020 Democratic National Convention was scheduled to be held at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, but it was moved to the nearby Wisconsin Center due to the COVID-19 pandemic.[3][4]

Polls of Wisconsin in the lead-up to election day showed a clear Biden lead, averaging in the high single digits. Prior to polling day, 14 out of the 15 news organizations considered that the state was leaning towards Biden. Biden ultimately won Wisconsin by a narrow 0.63% margin over Trump, who had won it in 2016 by 0.77% against Hillary Clinton; however, Biden carried the state with a slightly larger margin than Al Gore or John Kerry did in either 2000 or 2004, respectively. Once again, Trump massively outperformed his polling average, which had Biden up 8.4 points in the state, but it was not enough to win it. Trump held his own in counties in northern Wisconsin, and also in the WOW counties.[5] However, Biden won the highest vote share for a Democrat in Waukesha County, at 38.8%, since Jimmy Carter in 1976.[6] Trump carried Brown County, which is Republican-leaning but competitive, though Biden won the city of Green Bay and improved on Clinton's margin in the county at large by about 3.7 points.[7] Biden won back Sauk County, a county in the driftless region of southwestern Wisconsin; Biden also flipped Door County, which has voted for the winning candidate in each election since 1980, save for 1992.

On November 18, Trump announced that he would request a recount in Milwaukee County and Dane County.[8][9] On November 29, both counties had re-affirmed Biden's victory, giving him a net gain of 87 votes over Trump.[10]

Wisconsin is tied for the longest perfect streak with Michigan and Pennsylvania, neither of which have backed the losing candidate since after 2004, when all three backed Democratic nominee John Kerry, but incumbent President George W. Bush was re-elected.

Primary elections

Effects of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, several states delayed their scheduled primaries and extended the vote-by-mail period. Concerns were raised by health officials, poll workers, and voters that in-person voting at the height of the pandemic would be unsafe for vulnerable individuals.[11] Governor Tony Evers (D) signed an executive order for all-mail-in election, but the order was rejected by the Republican-controlled Wisconsin Legislature.[12]

On April 2, although U.S. District Judge William M. Conley refused to postpone the election, he extended the deadline for absentee voting to April 13 (ordering clerks not to release any election data before that date).[13][14] However, on April 6, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Conley's decision, meaning that all absentee ballots must still be postmarked by "election day, Tuesday, April 7" even though it will still be acceptable for the ballots to be received by the clerks as late as April 13.[15][16] The Supreme Court of the United States "did not alter the provision in Conley's amended order which prohibits the reporting of results until April 13".[17]

Governor Evers then called a special session of the legislature to postpone in-person voting, but the session ended within minutes without action, forcing the primary to go on as planned.[18]

Despite having previously expressed the view that he would violate the law by doing so,[19] on April 6, Evers issued an executive order which, if enforced, would have postponed the April 7 elections until the tentative date of June 9.[20][21] Republican leaders immediately announced that they would challenge the order in the Wisconsin Supreme Court.[20] The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that Evers did not have the authority to postpone the elections, thus meaning that Evers' executive order was nullified, and that the elections would be held as scheduled on April 7.[22]

This was appealed to a federal court who sided with the Governor, and that was appealed to the US Supreme Court, which on a 5–4 vote, upheld the State court's ruling.[23]

Voting was somewhat chaotic, with people waiting in the rain for hours in some cases in masks and social distancing.[24] However, by the time the election concluded, Milwaukee Election Commissioner Neil Albrecht stated that despite some of the problems, the in-person voting ran smoothly.[25]

Democratic primary

2020 Wisconsin Democratic presidential primary[26][27]
Candidate Votes[28] % Delegates[29]
Joe Biden 581,463 62.86% 56
Bernie Sanders 293,441 31.72% 28
Elizabeth Warren (withdrawn) 14,060 1.52%
Michael Bloomberg (withdrawn) 8,846 0.96%
Amy Klobuchar (withdrawn) 6,079 0.66%
Tulsi Gabbard (withdrawn) 5,565 0.60%
Pete Buttigieg (withdrawn) 4,946 0.53%
Andrew Yang (withdrawn) 3,349 0.36%
Tom Steyer (withdrawn) 836 0.09%
John Delaney (withdrawn) 529 0.06%
Michael Bennet (withdrawn) 475 0.05%
Deval Patrick (withdrawn) 311 0.03%
Uncommitted 3,590 0.39%
Scattering 1,575 0.17%
Total 925,065 100% 84

100% precincts reporting[30]

Republican primary

Incumbent President Donald Trump ran unopposed in the Republican primary, and thus received all of Wisconsin's 52 delegates to the 2020 Republican National Convention.[31]

2020 Wisconsin Republican primary
Candidate Votes % Delegates
Donald Trump 616,780 97.87% 52
Adam Nicholas Paul (write-in) 246 0.04%
Uninstructed 11,246 1.78%
Scattering 1,924 0.31%
Total 630,196 100% 52

General election

Predictions

Source Ranking As of
Princeton Electoral Consortium[32] Likely D (flip) November 3, 2020
The Cook Political Report[33] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
Inside Elections[34] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
Sabato's Crystal Ball[35] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
Politico[36] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
RCP[37] Tossup November 3, 2020
Niskanen[38] Likely D (flip) November 3, 2020
CNN[39] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
The Economist[40] Likely D (flip) November 3, 2020
CBS News[41] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
270towin[42] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
ABC News[43] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
NPR[44] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
NBC News[45] Lean D (flip) November 3, 2020
538[46] Likely D (flip) November 3, 2020

Graphical summary

Aggregate polls

Source of poll
aggregation
Dates
administered
Dates
updated
Donald
Trump

Republican
Joe
Biden

Democratic
Other/
Undecided
[lower-alpha 1]
Margin
270 to Win October 26 – November 1, 2020 November 1, 2020 43.8% 51.8% 4.4% Biden +8.0
Real Clear Politics October 21 – November 1, 2020 November 1, 2020 44.1% 50.7% 5.2% Biden +6.6
FiveThirtyEight until November 1, 2020 November 1, 2020 44.0% 51.9% 4.1% Biden +7.9
Average 44.0% 51.5% 4.6% Biden +7.5

2020 polls

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump

Republican
Joe
Biden

Democratic
Jo
Jorgensen

Libertarian
Howie
Hawkins

Green
Other Undecided
SurveyMonkey/Axios Oct 20 – Nov 2 2,814 (LV) ± 2.5% 44%[lower-alpha 3] 54% - -
Research Co. Oct 31 – Nov 1 450 (LV) ± 4.6% 45% 54% - - 1%[lower-alpha 4] 7%
Change Research/CNBC Oct 29 – Nov 1 553 (LV) ± 4.17% 45% 53% 2% - 0%
Civiqs/Daily Kos Oct 29 – Nov 1 789 (LV) ± 3.6% 47% 51% - - 1%[lower-alpha 5] 0%
Swayable Oct 27 – Nov 1 253 (LV) ± 8.2% 45% 55% 1% -
Ipsos/Reuters Oct 27 – Nov 1 696 (LV) ± 4.2% 43%[lower-alpha 6] 53% 2% 0% 2%[lower-alpha 7]
43%[lower-alpha 8] 53% - - 2%[lower-alpha 9] 2%
45%[lower-alpha 10] 53% - - 2%[lower-alpha 11]
AtlasIntel Oct 30–31 781 (LV) ± 3% 49% 51% - - 1%
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc./Center for American Greatness[upper-alpha 1] Oct 29–31 450 (LV) ± 4.6% 46% 49% - - 2%[lower-alpha 12] 1%
Morning Consult Oct 22–31 1,002 (LV) ± 3% 41% 54% - -
Emerson College Oct 29–30 751 (LV) ± 3.1% 45%[lower-alpha 13] 52% - - 2%[lower-alpha 14]
AtlasIntel Oct 29–30 672 (LV) ± 4% 50% 49% - - 2%
CNN/SSRS Oct 29–30 873 (LV) ± 3.9% 44% 52% 3% - 0%[lower-alpha 15] 2%
Siena College/NYT Upshot Oct 26–30 1,253 (LV) ± 3.2% 41% 52% 2% - 1%[lower-alpha 16] 4%[lower-alpha 17]
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Oct 26–29 800 (LV) 41% 53% 2% - 1% 2%
SurveyMonkey/Axios Oct 1–28 4,569 (LV) ± 2.0% 43% 55% - -
Swayable Oct 23–26 313 (LV) ± 7.2% 45% 54% 1% -
Ipsos/Reuters Oct 20–26 664 (LV) ± 4.3% 44%[lower-alpha 6] 53% 2% 1% 3%[lower-alpha 18]
44%[lower-alpha 19] 53% - - 2%[lower-alpha 20] 2%
Trafalgar Group Oct 24–25 1,082 (LV) ± 2.89% 47% 47% 3% - 1%[lower-alpha 21] 1%
Marquette Law School Oct 21–25 749 (LV) ± 4.4% 43% 48% 2% - 7%[lower-alpha 22] 0%
ABC/Washington Post Oct 20–25 809 (LV) ± 4% 40% 57% 2% - 1%[lower-alpha 23] 1%
Gravis Marketing Oct 23 677 (LV) ± 3.8% 43% 54% - - 3%
YouGov/University of Wisconsin-Madison Oct 13–21 647 (LV) ± 4.07% 44% 53% - - 3%[lower-alpha 24]
Fox News Oct 17–20 1,037 (LV) ± 3% 44% 49% 2% - 1%[lower-alpha 25] 4%
RMG Research/PoliticalIQ Oct 14–20 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 44%[lower-alpha 6] 50% - - 3%[lower-alpha 26] 4%
42%[lower-alpha 27] 52% - - 3%[lower-alpha 28] 4%
45%[lower-alpha 29] 48% - - 3%[lower-alpha 30] 4%
Morning Consult Oct 11–20 1,038 (LV) ± 3% 42% 54% - -
Susquehanna Polling and Research Inc./Center for American Greatness[upper-alpha 1] Oct 16–19 500 (LV) ± 4.3% 45% 45% 5% - 3%[lower-alpha 31] 3%
Change Research/CNBC Oct 16–19 447 (LV)[lower-alpha 32] 44% 52% - -
Latino Decisions/DFER[upper-alpha 2] Oct 14–19 400 (LV) ± 5% 45% 50% - - 4%
Ipsos/Reuters Oct 13–19 663 (LV) ± 4.3% 45%[lower-alpha 6] 51% 2% 0% 3%[lower-alpha 33]
43%[lower-alpha 34] 51% - - 3%[lower-alpha 35] 3%
Trafalgar Group Oct 14–16 1,051 (LV) ± 2.94% 46% 48% 2% - 1% 3%
YouGov/CBS Oct 13–16 1,112 (LV) ± 3.5% 45% 50% - - 3%[lower-alpha 36] 2%
Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC[upper-alpha 3] Oct 11–13 1,043 (LV) ± 2.95% 45% 47% 3% 2%[lower-alpha 37] 3%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Oct 10–13 691 (LV) 40%[lower-alpha 32] 53% 2% 0%
David Binder Research/Focus on Rural America Oct 10–13 200 (LV) 43% 53% - -
Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising[upper-alpha 4] Oct 8–11 560 (LV) ± 4.4% 45% 53% - - 2%[lower-alpha 38] 1%
Siena College/NYT Upshot Oct 8–11 789 (LV) ± 4% 41% 51% 3% - 0%[lower-alpha 39] 5%[lower-alpha 40]
Ipsos/Reuters Oct 6–11 577 (LV) ± 4.7% 45%[lower-alpha 6] 51% 2% 0% 1%[lower-alpha 41]
44%[lower-alpha 42] 51% - - 3%[lower-alpha 43] 2%
Morning Consult Oct 2–11 1,067 (LV) ± 3% 44% 51% - -
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Oct 9–10 613 (LV) 45%[lower-alpha 32] 49% 2% -
Baldwin Wallace University Sep 30 – Oct 8 883 (LV) ± 3.4% 43% 49% 2% 0% 1%[lower-alpha 44] 6%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Oct 4–7 688 (LV) ± 3.74% 41% 51% 1% - 1%[lower-alpha 45] 6%
Ipsos/Reuters Sep 29 – Oct 5 601 (LV) ± 4.6% 44% 50% - - 2%[lower-alpha 46] 4%
Change Research/CNBC Oct 2–4 442 (LV) 44% 51% - -
Marquette Law School Sep 30 – Oct 4 805 (RV) 41% 46% 5% - 7%[lower-alpha 47] 2%
700 (LV) 42% 47% 4% - 2%[lower-alpha 48] 1%
SurveyMonkey/Axios Sep 1–30 3,806 (LV) 44% 53% - - 2%
Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC[upper-alpha 3] Sep 25–28 1,084 (LV) ± 2.89% 44% 47% 3% - 2%[lower-alpha 49] 3%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Sep 23–27 663 (LV) ± 3.81% 43% 48% 2% - 0%[lower-alpha 50] 7%
Susquehanna Polling & Research Inc./Center for American Greatness[upper-alpha 1] Sep 23–26 500 (LV) ± 4.3% 46% 48% - -
Trafalgar Group (R) Sep 22–24 1,189 (LV) ± 2.76% 45% 48% 3% - 2%[lower-alpha 51] 3%
Marist College/NBC Sep 20–24 727 (LV) ± 4.6% 44% 54% - - 1% 1%
Baldwin Wallace University Sep 9–22 863 (LV) ± 3.7% 41% 50% 2% 0% 1%[lower-alpha 52] 6%
YouGov/UW-Madison Elections Research
Center/Wisconsin State Journal
Sep 10–21 664 (LV) 46% 50% - -
Change Research/CNBC Sep 18–20 571 (LV) 42% 51% - -
Hart Research Associates/Human Rights Campaign[upper-alpha 5] Sep 17–19 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 44% 51% - -
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Sep 12–16 636 (LV) ± 3.89% 41% 47% 1% 1% 1%[lower-alpha 53] 10%
Ipsos/Reuters Sep 11–16 609 (LV) 43% 48% - - 2%[lower-alpha 54] 6%
Morning Consult Sep 7–16 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 42%[lower-alpha 55] 51% - -
Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising[upper-alpha 4] Sep 11–15 549 (RV) ± 3.9% 44%[lower-alpha 32] 51% - - 2%[lower-alpha 56] 2%
Morning Consult Sep 6–15 800 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 51% - -
CNN/SSRS Sep 9–13 816 (LV) ± 4.2% 42% 52% 3% - 1%[lower-alpha 57] 1%
ABC/Washington Post Sep 8–13 605 (LV) ± 4.5% 46% 52% - - 1%[lower-alpha 58] 1%
Siena College/NYT Upshot Sep 8–10 760 (LV) ± 4.7% 43% 48% 2% 0% 2%[lower-alpha 59] 6%[lower-alpha 60]
Emerson College Sep 6–8 823 (LV) ± 3.4% 45%[lower-alpha 61] 52% - - 4%[lower-alpha 62]
Benenson Strategy Group/GS Group/AARP Aug 28 – Sep 8 1,200 (LV) ± 2.8% 45% 50% - - 1%[lower-alpha 63] 4%
Change Research/CNBC Sep 4–6 501 (LV) 44% 50% - - 6%[lower-alpha 64]
Morning Consult Aug 27 – Sep 5 763 (LV) ± 3.5% 44% 50% - -
YouGov/CBS Sep 2–4 978 (LV) ± 3.7% 44% 50% - - 2%[lower-alpha 65] 4%
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Aug 30 – Sep 4 670 (LV) ± 3.78% 41% 50% 2% 0% 0%[lower-alpha 66] 6%
Marquette Law School Aug 30 – Sep 3 688 (LV) 44% 48% 4% - 2%[lower-alpha 67] 2%
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports Sep 1–2 1,000 (LV) ± 3% 43% 51% - - 3%[lower-alpha 68] 2%
Fox News Aug 29 – Sep 1 801 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 50% 2% 1%[lower-alpha 69] 5%
853 (RV) ± 3% 41% 49% 2% 2%[lower-alpha 70] 5%
SurveyMonkey/Axios Aug 1–31 1,913 (LV) 49% 48% - - 2%
Opinium/The Guardian Aug 21–28 700 (LV) 40% 53% - - 1% 5%
Morning Consult Aug 17–26 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 52% - -
Change Research/CNBC Aug 21–23 925 (LV) 44% 49% - -
Trafalgar Group Aug 14–23 1,011 (LV) ± 2.99% 46% 45% 4% - 2%[lower-alpha 71] 3%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC[upper-alpha 3] Aug 17–20 600 (LV) 44% 52% - - 4%
Redfield and Wilton Strategies Aug 13–17 672 (LV) ± 3.9% 40% 49% 1% 1% 2%[lower-alpha 72] 7%
Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising[upper-alpha 4] Aug 13–17 753 (RV) 45% 51% - - 2%[lower-alpha 73] 2%
Morning Consult Aug 7–16 788 (LV) ± 3.5% 43%[lower-alpha 74] 49% - - 2%[lower-alpha 75] 5%
Morning Consult Aug 4–13 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 43% 50% - -
Change Research/CNBC Aug 6–9 384 (LV) 43% 47% - -
Marquette Law School Aug 4–9 694 (LV) ± 3.8% 46% 50% - - 3%[lower-alpha 76] 1%
YouGov/CBS Aug 4–7 994 (LV) ± 3.8% 42% 48% - - 3%[lower-alpha 77] 7%
Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports/American Greatness PAC[upper-alpha 1] Aug 5–6 750 (LV) 43% 55% - - 1% 1%
YouGov/University of Wisconsin-Madison Jul 27 – Aug 6 734 (RV) ± 4.9% 43% 49% - - 4%[lower-alpha 78] 4%
OnMessage Inc./Heritage Action[upper-alpha 6] Aug 2–4 400 (LV) ± 4.7% 47% 47% - - 6%
Morning Consult Jul 25 – Aug 3 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 41% 51% - -
David Binder Research Jul 30–31 200 (LV) 42% 53% - -
SurveyMonkey/Axios Jul 1–31 2,173 (LV) 48% 50% - - 2%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC[upper-alpha 3] Jul 22–27 600 (LV) 38% 52% - - 10%
Change Research/CNBC Jul 24–26 392 (LV) 43% 48% - -
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Jul 19–24 742 (LV) 35% 45% 2% 0% 3%[lower-alpha 79] 15%
Morning Consult Jul 15–24 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 44% 49% - -
Gravis Marketing Jul 22 796 (RV) ± 3.5% 42% 50% - - 7%
Global Strategy Group (D) Jul 11–17 600 (V) ± 4.0% 42% 51% - - 2%[lower-alpha 80] 4%[lower-alpha 81]
Spry Strategies/American Principles Project[upper-alpha 7] Jul 11–16 700 (LV) ± 3.7% 45% 46% - - 8%
Morning Consult Jul 5–14 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 41% 50% - -
Change Research/CNBC Jul 10–12 601 (LV) 42% 48% - -
Morning Consult Jun 25 – Jul 4 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 44% 50% - -
SurveyMonkey/Axios Jun 8–30 813 (LV) 47% 51% - - 2%
Change Research/CNBC Jun 26–28 502 (LV)[lower-alpha 32] 43% 51% - -
Trafalgar Group Jun 25–26 1,021 (LV) ± 3.0% 46% 45% - - 8%[lower-alpha 82] 2%
Ogden & Fry Jun 20–24 825 (LV) ± 3.48% 44% 45% - - 10%
Morning Consult Jun 15–24 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 44% 50% - -
Redfield & Wilton Strategies Jun 14–19 846 (LV) ± 3.37% 36% 45% 1% 1% 2%[lower-alpha 83] 15%
Marquette Law School Jun 14–18 686 (LV) 44% 52% - - 3%[lower-alpha 84] 1%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R) Jun 12–16 600 (LV) ± 4.0% 39% 55% - - 6%
NYT Upshot/Siena College Jun 8–15 655 (RV) ± 4.3% 38% 49% - - 5%[lower-alpha 85] 8%
Morning Consult Jun 5–14 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 44% 49% - -
Change Research/CNBC Jun 12–14 231 (LV)[lower-alpha 32] 44% 48% - - 5%[lower-alpha 86]
Morning Consult May 26 – Jun 4 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 44% 48% - -
Fox News May 30 – Jun 2 801 (RV) ± 3.5% 40% 49% - - 6%[lower-alpha 87] 5%
Change Research/CNBC May 29–31 382 (LV)[lower-alpha 32] 45% 45% - - 5% 6%
Morning Consult May 16–25 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 44% 48% - -
Morning Consult May 6–15 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 49% - -
Redfield & Wilton Strategies May 10–14 875 (LV) ± 3.3% 38% 48% - - 3%[lower-alpha 88] 10%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R) May 6–8 600 (LV) ± 3% 42% 51% - - 8%
Marquette Law School May 3–7 650 (LV) 45% 49% - - 4%[lower-alpha 89] 2%
Morning Consult Apr 26 – May 5 797 (LV) ± 3.5% 43% 49% - -
Public Policy Polling[upper-alpha 8] Apr 20–21 1,415 (RV) 45% 50% - - 4%
Ipsos Apr 15–20 645 (RV) ± 5.0% 40% 43% - -
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R) Apr 13–15 600 (RV) ± 3.0% 45% 50% - - 4%
Hart Research/CAP Action[upper-alpha 9] Apr 6–8 303 (RV) 47% 48% - - 2% 3%
Marquette Law School Mar 24–29 813 (RV) 45% 48% - - 4%[lower-alpha 90] 3%
Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes Mar 17–25 822 (RV) ± 3.8% 45% 45% - - 10%
Change Research Mar 21–23 510 (LV) 49% 45% - 6%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R) Mar 17–19 600 (RV) 49% 45% - -
Public Policy Polling Mar 10–11 1,727 (RV) 45% 48% - - 6%
YouGov/Yahoo News Mar 6–8 459 (RV) 42% 44% - - 6%[lower-alpha 91] 7%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Mar 5–7 502 (LV) ± 4.7% 45% 43% - -
Marquette Law School Feb 19–23 1,000 (RV) 46% 46% - - 5%[lower-alpha 92] 3%
YouGov Feb 11–20 936 (RV) ± 4.0% 43% 45% - -
Quinnipiac University Feb 12–18 823 (RV) ± 3.4% 49% 42% - - 4%[lower-alpha 93] 4%
Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute Feb 6–18 500 (RV) 44% 42% - - 13%
Tarrance Group/Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce Jan 14–16 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 46% 47% - - 6%
Marquette Law School Jan 8–12 701 (LV) 47% 48% - - 4%[lower-alpha 94] 2%
Fox News Jan 5–8 1,504 (RV) ± 2.5% 41% 46% - - 8%[lower-alpha 95] 4%

2019 polls

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump

Republican
Joe
Biden

Democratic
Other Undecided
Marquette Law School Dec 3–8 652 (LV) 47% 49% 2%[lower-alpha 96] 1%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Dec 3–5 610 (LV) ± 4.1% 48% 39% 8%[lower-alpha 97] 5%[lower-alpha 98]
Marquette Law School Nov 13–17 685 (LV) 48% 45% 5%[lower-alpha 99] 2%
NYT Upshot/Siena College Oct 13–26 651 (LV) ± 4.4% 44% 46%
Marquette Law School Oct 13–17 657 (LV) 44% 51% 3%[lower-alpha 100] 1%
Fox News Sep 29 – Oct 2 1,512 (RV) ± 2.5% 39% 48% 5% 6%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Sep 7–9 534 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 44% 14%
Marquette Law School Aug 25–29 672 (LV) 44% 51% 3%[lower-alpha 101] 2%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Jun 11–13 535 (LV) ± 4.3% 40% 46% 14%
WPA Intelligence Apr 27–30 200 (LV) ± 6.9% 46% 42% 9%
Zogby Analytics Apr 15–18 802 (LV) ± 3.5% 40% 50% 11%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Mar 19–21 616 (LV) ± 4.1% 40% 53% 5%
Emerson College Mar 15–17 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 46% 54%

Former candidates and hypothetical polling

Former candidates

Donald Trump vs. Michael Bloomberg

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Michael
Bloomberg (D)
Other Undecided
Marquette Law School Feb 19–23, 2020 1,000 (RV) 45% 44% 5%[lower-alpha 102] 5%
Quinnipiac University Feb 12–18, 2020 823 (RV) ± 3.4% 49% 41% 5%[lower-alpha 103] 5%
Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute Feb 6–18, 2020 500 (RV) 44% 43% 12%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Dec 3–5, 2019 610 (LV) ± 4.1% 49% 37% 10%[lower-alpha 104] 4%[lower-alpha 105]

Donald Trump vs. Cory Booker

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Cory
Booker (D)
Other Undecided
Marquette Law School Dec 3–8, 2019 652 (LV) 47% 45% 4%[lower-alpha 106] 4%
Marquette Law School Nov 13–17, 2019 685 (LV) 45% 45% 5%[lower-alpha 107] 4%

Donald Trump vs. Pete Buttigieg

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Pete
Buttigieg (D)
Other Undecided
Marquette Law School Feb 19–23, 2020 1,000 (RV) 45% 45% 5%[lower-alpha 108] 5%
YouGov Feb 11–20, 2020 936 (RV) ± 4.0% 43% 45%
Quinnipiac University Feb 12–18, 2020 823 (RV) ± 3.4% 49% 41% 5%[lower-alpha 109] 5%
Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute Feb 6–18, 2020 500 (RV) 43% 44% 13%
Marquette Law School Jan 8–12, 2020 701 (LV) 47% 45% 5%[lower-alpha 110] 4%
Fox News Jan 5–8, 2020 1,504 (RV) ± 2.5% 41% 42% 10[lower-alpha 111] 7%
Marquette Law School Dec 3–8, 2019 652 (LV) 47% 44% 4%[lower-alpha 112] 4%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Dec 3–5, 2019 610 (LV) ± 4.1% 49% 38% 8%[lower-alpha 113] 5%[lower-alpha 114]
Marquette Law School Nov 13–17, 2019 685 (LV) 48% 40% 7%[lower-alpha 115] 6%
Marquette Law School Oct 13–17, 2019 657 (LV) 44% 46% 5%[lower-alpha 116] 4%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Jun 11–13, 2019 535 (LV) ± 4.3% 41% 39% 20%
Zogby Analytics Apr 15–18, 2019 802 (LV) ± 3.5% 41% 44% 16%

Donald Trump vs. Kamala Harris

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Kamala
Harris (D)
Other Undecided
Marquette Law School Aug 25–29, 2019 672 (LV) 46% 46% 5%[lower-alpha 117] 4%
Zogby Analytics Apr 15–18, 2019 802 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 43% 14%
Emerson College Mar 15–17, 2019 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 50% 50%

Donald Trump vs. Amy Klobuchar

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Amy
Klobuchar (D)
Other Undecided
Marquette Law School Feb 19–23, 2020 1,000 (RV) 46% 46% 4%[lower-alpha 118] 4%
YouGov Feb 11–20, 2020 936 (RV) ± 4.0% 43% 44%
Quinnipiac University Feb 12–18, 2020 823 (RV) ± 3.4% 50% 39% 5%[lower-alpha 119] 6%
Marquette Law School Nov 13–17, 2019 685 (LV) 53% 36% 6%[lower-alpha 120] 4%
Emerson College Mar 15–17, 2019 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 50% 50%

Donald Trump vs. Beto O'Rourke

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Beto
O'Rourke (D)
Other Undecided
Zogby Analytics Apr 15–18, 2019 802 (LV) ± 3.5% 41% 44% 15%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Mar 19–21, 2019 616 (LV) ± 4.1% 42% 45% 9%
Emerson College Mar 15–17, 2019 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 49% 51%

Donald Trump vs. Bernie Sanders

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Bernie
Sanders (D)
Other Undecided
Marquette Law School Mar 24–29, 2020 813 (RV) 47% 45% 6%[lower-alpha 121] 2%
Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes Mar 17–25, 2020 822 (RV) ± 3.8% 46% 42% 12%
Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R) Mar 17–19, 2020 600 (RV) 50% 43%
Public Policy Polling Mar 10–11, 2020 1,727 (V) 46% 48% 7%
YouGov/Yahoo News Mar 6–8, 2020 459 (RV) 40% 46% 9%[lower-alpha 122] 5%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Mar 5–7, 2020 502 (LV) ± 4.7% 48% 42%
Marquette Law School Feb 19–23, 2020 1,000 (RV) 46% 48% 3%[lower-alpha 123] 3%
YouGov Feb 11–20, 2020 936 (RV) ± 4.0% 44% 46%
Quinnipiac University Feb 12–18, 2020 823 (RV) ± 3.4% 50% 43% 4%[lower-alpha 124] 4%
Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute Feb 6–18, 2020 500 (RV) 46% 45% 9%
Tarrance Group/Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce Jan 14–16, 2020 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 47% 47% 7%
Marquette Law School Jan 8–12, 2020 701 (LV) 47% 47% 3%[lower-alpha 125] 1%
Fox News Jan 5–8, 2020 1,504 (RV) ± 2.5% 42% 46% 8%[lower-alpha 126] 4%
Marquette Law School Dec 3–8, 2019 652 (LV) 48% 46% 4%[lower-alpha 127] 1%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Dec 3–5, 2019 610 (LV) ± 4.1% 51% 38% 7%[lower-alpha 128] 4%[lower-alpha 129]
Marquette Law School Nov 13–17, 2019 685 (LV) 49% 45% 5%[lower-alpha 130] 1%
NYT Upshot/Siena College Oct 13–26, 2019 651 (LV) ± 4.4% 46% 47%
Marquette Law School Oct 13–17, 2019 657 (LV) 45% 48% 4%[lower-alpha 131] 2%
Fox News Sep 29 – Oct 2, 2019 1,512 (RV) ± 2.5% 40% 45% 5% 6%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Sep 7–9, 2019 534 (LV) ± 4.0% 43% 49% 8%
Marquette Law School Aug 25–29, 2019 672 (LV) 46% 48% 4%[lower-alpha 132] 1%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Jun 11–13, 2019 535 (LV) ± 4.3% 40% 47% 13%
Zogby Analytics Apr 15–18, 2019 802 (LV) ± 3.5% 42% 49% 9%
Tulchin Research (D)[upper-alpha 10] Apr 14–18, 2019 400 (LV) ± 4.9% 42% 52%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Mar 19–21, 2019 616 (LV) ± 4.1% 41% 48% 7%
Emerson College Mar 15–17, 2019 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 48% 52%

Donald Trump vs. Elizabeth Warren

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Elizabeth
Warren (D)
Other Undecided
Marquette Law School Feb 19–23, 2020 1,000 (RV) 47% 44% 4%[lower-alpha 133] 4%
YouGov Feb 11–20, 2020 936 (RV) ± 4.0% 44% 46%
Quinnipiac University Feb 12–18, 2020 823 (RV) ± 3.4% 51% 41% 4%[lower-alpha 134] 4%
Marquette Law School Jan 8–12, 2020 701 (LV) 49% 45% 5%[lower-alpha 135] 2%
Fox News Jan 5–8, 2020 1,504 (RV) ± 2.5% 41% 44% 9%[lower-alpha 136] 5%
Marquette Law School Dec 3–8, 2019 652 (LV) 48% 46% 5%[lower-alpha 137] 2%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Dec 3–5, 2019 610 (LV) ± 4.1% 50% 37% 8%[lower-alpha 138] 5%[lower-alpha 139]
Marquette Law School Nov 13–17, 2019 685 (LV) 50% 43% 4%[lower-alpha 140] 2%
NYT Upshot/Siena College Oct 13–26, 2019 651 (LV) ± 4.4% 47% 45%
Marquette Law School Oct 13–17, 2019 657 (LV) 45% 50% 3%[lower-alpha 141] 1%
Fox News Sep 29 – Oct 2, 2019 1,512 (RV) ± 2.5% 41% 45% 5% 7%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Sep 7–9, 2019 534 (LV) ± 4.0% 42% 43% 15%
Marquette Law School Aug 25–29, 2019 672 (LV) 46% 48% 4%[lower-alpha 142] 3%
Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus Jun 11–13, 2019 535 (LV) ± 4.3% 41% 41% 18%
Zogby Analytics Apr 15–18, 2019 802 (LV) ± 3.5% 41% 47% 12%
Emerson College Mar 15–17, 2019 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 48% 52%
Zogby Analytics Aug 17–23, 2017 603 (LV) ± 4.0% 37% 48% 15%
Hypothetical polling

with Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and Howard Schultz

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Joe
Biden (D)
Howard
Schultz (I)
Undecided
Emerson College Mar 15–17, 2019 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 44% 51% 4%

with Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Howard Schultz

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Bernie
Sanders (D)
Howard
Schultz (I)
Undecided
Emerson College Mar 15–17, 2019 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 46% 48% 5%

with Donald Trump and generic Democrat

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Generic
Democrat
Other Undecided
Baldwin Wallace University/Oakland University/Ohio Northern University Mar 17–25, 2020 997 (RV) ± 3.7% 46.8%[lower-alpha 143] 50.4% 2.8%[lower-alpha 144]
Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute Feb 6–18, 2020 500 (RV) 41% 49% 11%
Baldwin Wallace University/Oakland University/Ohio Northern University Jan 8–20, 2020 1,038 (RV) ± 3.3% 36.7%[lower-alpha 145] 51.2% 12%
KFF/Cook Political Report Sep 23 – Oct 15, 2019 745 (RV) ± 4% 28% 41% 21%
Change Research/Crooked Media Aug 9–11, 2019 1,966 (V) ± 2.2% 45% 46% 3%[lower-alpha 146] 6%
Public Policy Polling (D)[upper-alpha 11] Apr 23–24, 2019 762 (V) ± 3.6% 44% 53% 4%

with Donald Trump and generic Opponent

Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[lower-alpha 2]
Margin
of error
Donald
Trump (R)
Generic
Opponent
Other Undecided
Marquette University Released Apr 7, 2019 800 (RV) 42% 57%[lower-alpha 147] 0%[lower-alpha 148] 4%
Emerson College Mar 15–17, 2019 775 (RV) ± 3.5% 45% 55%[lower-alpha 149]
Marquette University Jan 16–20, 2019 800 (RV) 39% 57%[lower-alpha 150] 0%[lower-alpha 151] 4%

Green Party and Kanye West ballot access lawsuits

In August 2020, the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission voted to keep rapper Kanye West, an independent presidential candidate, off of the 2020 general election ballot in a 5-1 decision on the basis that West's application arrived too late—arriving in person seconds after the deadline.[47]

The Commission was split along party lines in a 3-3 decision to keep Howie Hawkins, the Green Party presidential candidate off of the 2020 general election ballot.[48] Hawkins gathered 3,623 valid signatures; however, forms with 1,834 signatures had a different address for Hawkins' running mate Angela Walker. The partisan board voted only to certify the 1,789, placing Hawkins/Walker below the 2,000 signatures required to be on the ballot.[49]

Walker subsequently filed a legal petition to be included on the ballot. On September 10, 2020, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that that election officials had to wait to mail absentee ballots until the court decided whether or not to include the Green Party on the ballot. Some municipal election commissions had already mailed out absentee ballots while others were concerned that they would miss the September 17 deadline by which Wisconsin state law required absentee ballots to mailed out to those who requested them.[50] On September 14, 2020, the court ruled that the ballots would remain as-is without Hawkins or West on the ballot stating, "given their delay in asserting their rights, we would be unable to provide meaningful relief without completely upsetting the election."[51]

Results

2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin[52][53]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic Joe Biden
Kamala Harris
1,630,866 49.45% +3.00%
Republican Donald Trump
Mike Pence
1,610,184 48.82% +1.60%
Libertarian Jo Jorgensen
Spike Cohen
38,491 1.17% -2.41%
American Solidarity Brian Carroll
Amar Patel
5,259 0.16% +0.15%
Constitution Don Blankenship
William Mohr
5,146 0.16% -0.25%
Green Howie Hawkins (write-in)
Angela Walker (write-in)
1,089 0.03% -1.01%
Independent Kanye West (write-in)
Michelle Tidball (write-in)
411 0.01% N/A
Socialism and Liberation Gloria La Riva (write-in)
Sunil Freeman (write-in)
110 0.00% N/A
Independent Mark Charles (write-in)
Adrian Wallace (write-in)
52 0.00% N/A
Independent Jade Simmons (write-in)
Claudeliah Roze (write-in)
36 0.00% N/A
Independent Kasey Wells (write-in)
No running mate
25 0.00% N/A
Independent President R19 Boddie (write-in)
No running mate
5 0.00% N/A
Write-in 6,367 0.19% -0.57%
Total votes 3,298,041 100%

Between 2016 and 2020, the number of voters in Milwaukee suburban counties voting for the Democratic presidential candidate increased.[54]

By county

Official results by county following recount.[55][lower-alpha 152]

County Biden Trump Jorgensen Other Total
% Vote % Vote % Vote % Vote
Adams 36.63%4,32962.29%7,3620.72%850.27%3211,818
Ashland 54.82%4,80143.86%3,8410.80%700.33%298,757
Barron 36.27%9,19462.35%15,8031.03%2620.30%7625,346
Bayfield 56.50%6,14742.44%4,6170.74%800.29%3210,880
Brown 45.49%65,51152.68%75,8711.27%1,8290.33%478144,017
Buffalo 36.59%2,86061.85%4,8341.02%800.40%317,816
Burnett 35.19%3,56963.72%6,4620.85%860.24%2410,141
Calumet 39.37%12,11659.00%18,1561.18%3630.41%12630,774
Chippewa 38.91%13,98359.32%21,3171.39%5010.31%11335,938
Clark 30.37%4,52467.14%10,0021.13%1681.23%18314,898
Columbia 48.45%16,41049.98%16,9271.24%4210.33%11133,869
Crawford 45.46%3,95353.13%4,6201.06%920.35%308,695
Dane 75.46%260,18522.85%78,8001.06%3,6680.39%1,330344,791
Dodge 33.77%16,35664.73%31,3551.10%5350.39%19048,436
Door 49.93%10,04448.48%9,7521.15%2310.29%5920,117
Douglas 53.56%13,21844.26%10,9231.54%3790.34%8424,677
Dunn 42.07%9,89756.00%13,1731.56%3680.37%8623,524
Eau Claire 54.26%31,62043.49%25,3411.59%9250.38%22358,275
Florence 26.56%78172.55%2,1330.75%220.14%42,940
Fond du Lac 35.96%20,58862.45%35,7541.20%6860.34%19457,251
Forest 34.06%1,72165.01%3,2850.69%350.16%85,053
Grant 42.95%10,99855.22%14,1421.37%3500.30%7825,608
Green 50.69%10,85147.51%10,1691.27%2710.38%8121,406
Green Lake 31.34%3,34467.17%7,1681.03%1100.25%2710,671
Iowa 55.95%7,82842.23%5,9091.15%1610.56%7813,992
Iron 38.23%1,53360.80%2,4380.65%260.20%84,010
Jackson 41.79%4,25656.86%5,7911.09%1110.26%2610,184
Jefferson 41.48%19,90456.71%27,2081.32%6340.26%12647,979
Juneau 34.62%4,74663.82%8,7491.06%1460.32%4413,709
Kenosha 47.55%42,19350.68%44,9721.17%1,0370.35%31288,738
Kewaunee 32.87%3,97665.54%7,9271.05%1270.39%4712,095
La Crosse 55.75%37,84642.25%28,6841.29%8770.43%29367,884
Lafayette 42.63%3,64756.35%4,8210.67%570.33%288,555
Langlade 33.18%3,70465.65%7,3300.84%940.33%3711,165
Lincoln 37.95%6,26160.72%10,0171.06%1750.27%4416,497
Manitowoc 37.52%16,81860.72%27,2181.23%5530.40%17944,829
Marathon 40.14%30,80858.14%44,6241.21%9290.35%26676,751
Marinette 32.06%7,36666.60%15,3041.03%2370.31%7222,979
Marquette 35.73%3,23963.09%5,7190.86%780.19%179,065
Menominee 81.95%1,30317.48%2780.38%60.19%31,590
Milwaukee 69.13%317,27029.27%134,3570.95%4,3400.38%1,753458,971
Monroe 37.30%8,43360.92%13,7751.16%2630.44%10022,611
Oconto 28.93%6,71569.89%16,2260.90%2100.28%6423,215
Oneida 41.83%10,10556.59%13,6711.17%2830.30%7324,159
Outagamie 44.13%47,66754.05%58,3851.45%1,5690.37%401108,022
Ozaukee 43.13%26,51755.15%33,9121.05%6470.33%20161,486
Pepin 35.93%1,48962.36%2,5841.23%510.48%204,144
Pierce 42.01%9,79654.96%12,8151.64%3831.22%28423,317
Polk 35.53%9,37062.99%16,6111.10%2890.38%10126,371
Portage 50.31%20,42847.53%19,2991.58%6400.42%16940,603
Price 35.48%3,03263.12%5,3941.15%980.26%228,546
Racine 47.12%50,15951.18%54,4791.13%1,2000.36%380106,451
Richland 44.32%3,99554.04%4,8711.13%1020.38%349,014
Rock 54.66%46,65843.51%37,1381.28%1,0940.34%29385,360
Rusk 31.92%2,51766.66%5,2571.08%850.28%227,886
Sauk 50.02%18,10848.32%17,4931.22%4410.44%16136,203
Sawyer 42.80%4,49856.22%5,9090.59%620.25%2610,510
Shawano 31.53%7,13167.09%15,1731.12%2530.26%5822,615
Sheboygan 41.06%27,10156.97%37,6091.36%8960.36%23866,011
St. Croix 40.89%23,19056.78%32,1991.55%8780.54%30756,707
Taylor 25.20%2,69371.65%7,6571.06%1132.06%22010,686
Trempealeau 40.86%6,28557.43%8,8331.15%1770.42%6415,380
Vernon 46.83%7,45751.61%8,2181.14%1820.39%6215,923
Vilas 38.41%5,90360.26%9,2610.90%1380.23%3615,369
Walworth 39.56%22,78958.77%33,8511.11%6410.34%19657,600
Washburn 37.26%3,86761.03%6,3341.19%1230.35%3610,378
Washington 30.26%26,65068.40%60,2371.07%9410.27%24288,070
Waukesha 38.77%103,90659.57%159,6491.13%3,0230.27%728267,996
Waupaca 33.31%9,70365.06%18,9521.23%3570.28%8329,130
Waushara 32.34%4,38866.45%9,0160.85%1150.36%4913,568
Winnebago 46.86%44,06050.83%47,7961.73%1,6290.38%35794,032
Wood 39.63%16,36558.86%24,3080.98%4030.34%14141,298
Totals 49.45%1,630,67348.83%1,610,0651.17%38,4910.37%12,1303,297,352

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

By congressional district

Trump won 6 out of 8 congressional districts in Wisconsin.

District Trump Biden Representative
1st 54% 45% Bryan Steil
2nd 29% 69% Mark Pocan
3rd 52% 47% Ron Kind
4th 23% 76% Gwen Moore
5th 57% 42% Jim Sensenbrenner
Scott Fitzgerald
6th 57% 42% Glenn Grothman
7th 59% 39% Tom Tiffany
8th 57% 41% Mike Gallagher

Edison exit polls

2020 presidential election in Wisconsin by demographic subgroup (Edison exit polling)[56]
Demographic subgroup Biden Trump % of

total vote

Total vote 50 49 99
Ideology
Liberals 91 8 25
Moderates 60 38 38
Conservatives 11 88 36
Party
Democrats 96 4 32
Republicans 7 93 37
Independents 54 42 31
Gender
Men 44 54 50
Women 56 43 50
Race/ethnicity
White 46 52 86
Black 92 8 6
Latino 60 37 4
Age
18–24 years old 61 33 8
25–29 years old 56 40 5
30–39 years old 52 46 14
40–49 years old 53 46 14
50–64 years old 46 53 32
65 and older 47 53 26
Sexual orientation
LGBT 80 16 5
Heterosexual 48 51 95
Education
High school or less 44 54 22
Some college education 49 49 27
Associate's degree 43 56 16
Bachelor's degree 52 46 23
Postgraduate degree 68 31 11
Income
Under $30,000 65 31 15
$30,000–49,999 55 44 20
$50,000–99,999 47 52 38
$100,000–199,999 43 56 21
Over $200,000 45 55 5
Union households
Yes 59 40 14
No 48 51 86
Issue regarded as most important
Racial inequality 91 6 13
Coronavirus 88 11 19
Economy 13 85 35
Crime and safety 17 82 13
Health care 81 19 8
Region
Milwaukee County 69 29 14
Milwaukee Suburbs 41 58 22
Dane County 76 23 10
Fox River Valley/N. Lakeshore 43 55 17
Southwest 47 52 19
North 39 59 17
Area type
Urban 69 30 30
Suburban 43 55 49
Rural 38 60 22
Family's financial situation today
Better than four years ago 16 83 39
Worse than four years ago 87 12 21
About the same 63 35 40

Aftermath

On November 6, Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien said: "There have been reports of irregularities in several Wisconsin counties which raise serious doubts about the validity of the results." No evidence of such "irregularities" has been provided by the Trump campaign.[57]

On November 18, the Trump campaign wired nearly $3 million dollars to the Wisconsin Election Commission in a petition for a partial recount of the 2020 presidential election results. The recount would take place in Milwaukee and Dane counties. "These two counties were selected because they are the locations of the worst irregularities", the campaign said in a release.[58]

Milwaukee certified its recount results on November 27, 2020, and led to Joe Biden gaining a net 132 votes. Dane certified its recount results on November 29, 2020, and led to Donald Trump gaining a net 45 votes. This means that, in total, the recount across the two counties led to Joe Biden increasing his lead by an additional 87 votes.

Electors

On November 30, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers certified Wisconsin's electors for Biden.[59] The following electors all cast their vote for Biden:

Analysis

Prior to 2016, Wisconsin was seen as a reliably Democratic state, as it made up part of the blue wall and had only gone Republican four times since 1964, and had a blue streak going back to 1988. Trump pulled off a surprise win in the state in 2016, in large part due to a collapse in support for Hillary Clinton in the state, as Trump ran behind Mitt Romney's 2012 performance that year.

Both the Democratic and Republican candidates improved on their performances in the state in 2020, with Trump achieving a record total number of votes for a Republican candidate in the state of Wisconsin, nearly matching George W. Bush's 2004 performance in percentage. Conversely, Biden had the second most votes ever for a Democrat in Wisconsin, behind Obama's performance in 2008. While Biden's margin of victory was narrow (0.6%), and well behind Barack Obama's performances, it was nonetheless wider than Al Gore's 0.2% in 2000 and John Kerry's 0.4% in 2004.

Joe Biden received strong support in the city of Milwaukee, improving on Clinton's 2016 performance by 3.6 points in its county; Biden received 92% and 60% of the black and Latino vote respectively, with most of that electorate living in Milwaukee County. Both candidates performed well in the state with whites, with Trump carrying whites overall by 6 points, though Biden performed better with college-educated whites. Cementing Biden's victory was his strong performance in Dane County, which he carried by nearly 53 points. Biden would also carry La Crosse County by 13 points, Eau Claire County by 10 points, and flipped Sauk County and the bellwether Door County, while only losing Brown County by 7 points, winning the county seat Green Bay. Biden even made in-roads in Waukesha and Washington counties, nearly breaking 40% in the former and broke 30% in the latter, though Trump still held these counties with large margins.

On the other hand, Trump was able to hold much of the driftless region in southwestern Wisconsin; many of these counties, such as Vernon, Crawford, and Grant were reliably Democratic during the latter-half of the 20th century, but Trump maintained the momentum he had in 2016, solidifying a Republican shift in this part of the state. Additionally, Trump performed strongly in the more traditionally conservative northern counties of Wisconsin. Finally, Trump kept Kenosha County in his column, with both candidates improving there; Kenosha County is significant, as it was the site of the Jacob Blake shooting, which triggered nationwide protests.

In terms of partisan lean, Biden was able to win 7% of Republicans in the state, which is significant, as they voted in this cycle by about 5 points more than Democrats. More importantly, Biden won independent voters by 12 points; Hillary Clinton lost this bloc to Trump by 10 points in 2016.

See also

Notes

Voter samples and additional candidates
  1. Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.
  2. Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  3. Overlapping sample with the previous SurveyMonkey/Axios poll, but more information available regarding sample size
  4. "Someone else" with 1%
  5. "Someone else" with 1%
  6. Standard VI response
  7. "Some other candidate" with 2%; West (B) and would not vote with 0%
  8. If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
  9. "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
  10. Results considering those who lean towards a given candidate among those initially predisposed towards abstention, indecision or a candidate besides Biden or Trump in the response section immediately above
  11. "Some other candidate" with 2%
  12. "Other" and "Refused/would not vote" with 1%
  13. With voters who lean towards a given candidate
  14. "Someone else" with 2%
  15. "None of these" and "Other" with 0%
  16. "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 0%
  17. Includes "Refused"
  18. "Some other candidate" with 1%; West (B) and would not vote with 0%
  19. If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
  20. "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
  21. "Someone else" with 1%
  22. "Refused" with 6%; "None/other" with 1%; Did not vote with 0%
  23. "None of these" with 1%; "Other" with 0%; would not vote with no voters
  24. Includes Undecided
  25. "Other" with 1%; would not vote with no voters
  26. "Some other candidate" with 3%
  27. Results generated with high Democratic turnout model
  28. "Some other candidate" with 3%
  29. Results generated with high Republican turnout model
  30. "Some other candidate" with 3%
  31. "Refused" with 2%; "Other" with 1%
  32. Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight
  33. "Some other candidate" with 2%; West (B) with 1%; would not vote with 0%
  34. If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
  35. "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%
  36. "Someone else/third party" with 3%
  37. "Someone else" with 2%
  38. "Someone else" with 2%
  39. "Someone else" and would not vote with 0%
  40. Includes "Refused"
  41. "Some other candidate" with 1%; West (B) and would not vote with 0%
  42. If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available
  43. "Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%
  44. "Another candidate" with 1%
  45. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%
  46. "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
  47. "None/other" with 2% and "refused" with 5%
  48. "None/other" and "refused" with 1%
  49. "Another Party Candidate" with 2%
  50. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 0%
  51. "Another Party Candidate" with 2%
  52. "Another candidate" with 1%
  53. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%
  54. "Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%
  55. Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding sampling period
  56. "Someone else" with 2%
  57. "None of these" with 1%; "Other" with 0%
  58. "Neither" with 1%; "Other" and would not vote with 0%
  59. "Someone else" and would not vote with 1%
  60. Includes "Refused"
  61. With voters who lean towards a given candidate
  62. "Someone else" with 4%
  63. Would not vote with 1%
  64. "Other/not sure" with 6%
  65. "Someone else/third party" with 2%
  66. "Another Third Party/Write-in" with 0%
  67. "Refused" with 2%; "None/other" with 0%
  68. "Someone else" with 3%
  69. "Other" with 1%
  70. "Other" and would not vote with 1%
  71. "Another Party Candidate"
  72. "Another Third Party/Write-in" and West (B) with 1%
  73. "Someone else" with 2%
  74. Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding third party and undecided voters
  75. "Someone else" with 2%
  76. "Neither" with 2%; "refused" with 1%
  77. "Someone else/third party" with 3%
  78. "Other" with 3%; would not vote with 1%
  79. West (B) with 2%; "Another Third Party/Write-In" 1%
  80. "Other candidate" with 2%
  81. Includes "refused"
  82. "Other party candidate" with 8%
  83. "Other" with 2%
  84. "Neither" with 2%; "refused" with 1%
  85. "Another candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 2%
  86. "Libertarian Party candidate/Green Party candidate" with 5%
  87. "Other" with 4%; would not vote with 2%
  88. "Third party/write-in" with 3%
  89. "Neither" with 3%; "Refused" with 1%
  90. "Neither" with 3%; "refused" with 1%
  91. "Other" with 5%; would not vote with 1%
  92. "Neither" with 4%; "Refused" with 0%
  93. "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 3%
  94. "Neither" with 3%; "Refused" with 1%
  95. Other with 6%; wouldn't vote with 2%
  96. Neither with 1%; refused with 1%
  97. A third party candidate with 6%; would not vote with 2%
  98. Includes "refused"
  99. Neither with 4%; refused with 1%
  100. Neither with 3%; refused with 0%
  101. "Neither" with 2%; "refused" with 1%
  102. "Neither" with 5%; "refused" with 1%
  103. "Someone else" with 2%; would not vote with 3%
  104. A third party candidate with 8%; would not vote with 2%
  105. Includes "refused"
  106. Neither with 3%; refused with 1%
  107. Neither with 3%; refused with 2%
  108. "Neither" with 5%; "refused" with 1%
  109. "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 4%
  110. "Neither" with 4%; refused with 1%
  111. Other with 7%; wouldn't vote with 3%
  112. Neither with 2%; refused with 2%
  113. A third party candidate with 6%; would not vote with 2%
  114. Includes "refused"
  115. Neither with 5%; refused with 2%
  116. Neither with 5%; refused with 0%
  117. "Neither" with 4%; "refused" with 1%
  118. "Neither" with 4%; "refused" with 0%
  119. "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 4%
  120. Neither with 5%; refused with 1%
  121. "Neither" with 5%; "refused" with 1%
  122. "Other" with 7%; would not vote with 2%
  123. "Neither" with 3%; "refused" with 1%
  124. "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 3%
  125. "Neither" with 3%; refused with 0%
  126. Other with 6%; wouldn't vote with 2%
  127. Neither with 3%; refused with 1%
  128. A third party candidate with 6%; would not vote with 2%
  129. Includes "refused"
  130. Neither with 4%; refused with 1%
  131. Neither with 4%; refused with 0%
  132. "Neither" with 3%; "refused" with 1%
  133. "Neither" with 4%; "refused" with 1%
  134. "Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 3%
  135. "Neither" with 4%; refused with 1%
  136. Other with 6%; wouldn't vote with 3%
  137. Neither with 3%; refused with 2%
  138. A third party candidate with 6%; would not vote with 2%
  139. Includes "refused"
  140. Neither with 3%; refused with 1%
  141. Neither with 3%; refused with 0%
  142. "Neither" with 3%; "refused" with 1%
  143. Figures for each candidate in this poll include undecided voters who were reported to lean towards that candidate at the time of polling.
  144. "It depends on who the Democrats nominate" with 1.9%; "unsure" with 0.9%
  145. Figures for each candidate in this poll include undecided voters who were reported to lean towards that candidate at the time of polling.
  146. "Third-party candidate" with 3%
  147. "Would probably or definitely vote for someone other than Trump" with 57%
  148. "Refused" with 0%
  149. Listed as "unlikely to vote for Trump" as opposed to "likely to vote for Trump"
  150. "Would probably or definitely vote for someone other than Trump" with 57%
  151. "Refused" with 0%
  152. To view in other formats, see at Wisconsin's Elections Commission
Partisan clients
  1. The Center for American Greatness is a pro-Trump organization
  2. This poll’s sponsor, DFER, primarily supports Democratic candidates
  3. The Restoration PAC is a 501 non-profit which supports Donald Trump's 2020 presidential campaign
  4. Rust Belt Rising is affiliated with the Democratic Party
  5. The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period
  6. Heritage Action is the sister organisation of the Heritage Foundation, which exclusively endorses Republican candidates
  7. This poll's sponsor is the American Principles Project, a 501(c)(4) organization that supports the Republican Party.
  8. Poll sponsored by Protect Our Care, a pro-Affordable Care Act organisation
  9. CAP Action is a political advocacy group that exclusively supports Democratic candidates
  10. Poll sponsored by the Sanders campaign
  11. Poll sponsored by Protect Our Care

References

  1. Kelly, Ben (August 13, 2018). "US elections key dates: When are the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential campaign?". The Independent. Archived from the original on January 3, 2019. Retrieved January 3, 2019.
  2. "Distribution of Electoral Votes". National Archives and Records Administration. Archived from the original on January 9, 2019. Retrieved January 3, 2019.
  3. "City of Milwaukee 1 of 3 finalists to host 2020 Democratic National Convention". FOX6Now.com. June 20, 2018. Archived from the original on July 1, 2018. Retrieved July 1, 2018.
  4. Glauber, Bill (August 22, 2018). "Selection committee for 2020 Democratic Convention will visit Milwaukee next week". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on August 23, 2018. Retrieved August 24, 2018.
  5. "Let's Take a Deep Dive Into How the WOW Counties Voted". Milwaukee Magazine. November 6, 2020. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 16, 2020.
  6. Leip, David. "Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections". uselectionatlas.org. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  7. BeMiller, Haley; Bollier, Jeff (November 4, 2020). "Green Bay pads Biden's lead in Wisconsin as Brown County overall goes for Trump". Green Bay Press Gazette. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
  8. "Trump Wisconsin recount can't start until counties canvass". AP NEWS. November 9, 2020. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  9. Jeff Zeleny and Casey Tolan. "Trump campaign to seek partial recount in Wisconsin". CNN. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  10. Helderman, Rosalind (November 29, 2020). "Wisconsin recount confirms Biden's win over Trump, cementing the president's failure to change the election results". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
  11. "Wisconsin set to hold in-person voting in presidential primary". Reuters. April 4, 2020. Retrieved April 5, 2020.
  12. Coronavirus is disrupting the 2020 election. Here’s a list of all the primaries that have been postponed by Yelena Dzhanova, CNBC, 2 Apr 2020
  13. Todd Richmond (April 3, 2020). "Wisconsin barrels ahead with election despite virus fears". AP.
  14. Johnson, Martin (April 4, 2020). "Wisconsin Republicans say they will ask Supreme Court to block extended absentee voting". TheHill. Retrieved April 5, 2020.
  15. "Supreme Court blocks extended absentee voting in Wisconsin primary". Channel3000.com. April 6, 2020. Retrieved April 6, 2020.
  16. Supreme Court of the United States (April 6, 2020). "REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. No. 19A1016" (PDF). electionlawblog.org. Retrieved April 6, 2020.
  17. "URGENT – Wisconsin Supreme Court Orders Election Day to Continue and U.S. Supreme Court Alters Ballot Receipt Deadline; Tallying and Reporting Results Still Prohibited Until April 13 – COVID-19". Wisconsin Elections Commission. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
  18. Glauber, Bill; Marley, Patrick. "In matter of seconds, Republicans stall Gov. Tony Evers' move to postpone Tuesday election". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
  19. Governor Evers Tweet April 1 2020
  20. CNN, Eric Bradner and Kate Sullivan (April 6, 2020). "Wisconsin governor orders delay of primary election until June". CNN. Retrieved April 6, 2020.
  21. Ruthhart, Bill. "Wisconsin governor issues executive order to delay Tuesday's election until June". chicagotribune.com.
  22. "Wisconsin Supreme Court rules Evers cannot postpone election". WISN. Associated Press. April 6, 2020. Retrieved April 6, 2020.
  23. https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/scotus-wisconsin-election/
  24. https://www.axios.com/wisconsin-results-coronavirus-supreme-court-0715ee50-a85b-41e8-a4ef-053290bc2692.html
  25. Milwaukee Election Chief: Despite Some Issues, In-Person Voting Went Smoothly
  26. "Wisconsin Election Results 2020". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved April 30, 2020.
  27. "April 2020 Spring Election and Presidential Preference Primary Results". Wisconsin Elections Commission. Wisconsin Secretary of State. Retrieved June 11, 2020.
  28. Canvass Results for 2020 Spring Election and Presidential Preference Vote - 4/7/2020 (PDF) (Report). Wisconsin Elections Commission. May 4, 2020. pp. 1–2. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  29. "Delegate Tracker". interactives.ap.org. Associated Press. Retrieved April 30, 2020.
  30. https://www.newyorker.com/news/election-2020/wisconsin-primary-live-election-results
  31. "Wisconsin Republican Delegation 2020". The Green Papers. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved April 5, 2020.
  32. "2020 Electoral Maps from Princeton Election Consortium". Princeton University. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 22, 2020.
  33. "2020 POTUS Race ratings" (PDF). The Cook Political Report. Archived from the original on March 23, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
  34. "POTUS Ratings | Inside Elections". insideelections.com. Archived from the original on May 27, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
  35. "Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » 2020 President". crystalball.centerforpolitics.org. Archived from the original on April 4, 2020. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
  36. "2020 Election Forecast". Politico. November 19, 2019. Archived from the original on June 14, 2020. Retrieved April 8, 2020.
  37. "Battle for White House". RCP. April 19, 2019. Archived from the original on May 3, 2020. Retrieved April 27, 2020.
  38. 2020 Bitecofer Model Electoral College Predictions Archived April 23, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, Niskanen Center, March 24, 2020, retrieved: April 19, 2020.
  39. David Chalian; Terence Burlij. "Road to 270: CNN's debut Electoral College map for 2020". CNN. Archived from the original on June 16, 2020. Retrieved June 16, 2020.
  40. "Forecasting the US elections". The Economist. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved July 7, 2020.
  41. "2020 Election Battleground Tracker". CBS News. July 12, 2020. Archived from the original on July 12, 2020. Retrieved July 13, 2020.
  42. "2020 Presidential Election Interactive Map". 270 to Win. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved April 15, 2020.
  43. "ABC News Race Ratings". CBS News. July 24, 2020. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  44. "2020 Electoral Map Ratings: Trump Slides, Biden Advantage Expands Over 270 Votes". NPR.org. Archived from the original on August 4, 2020. Retrieved August 3, 2020.
  45. "Biden dominates the electoral map, but here's how the race could tighten". NBC News. Archived from the original on August 7, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
  46. "2020 Election Forecast". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on September 11, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  47. Dennis, LaToya (August 21, 2020). "Wisconsin Elections Commission Votes Against Allowing Kanye West, Green Party Candidates On Ballot". www.wuwm.com. WUMW. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
  48. "Green Party candidates sue to get on Wisconsin's ballot this fall". www.channel3000.com. CBS Madison. August 4, 2020. Retrieved December 7, 2020.
  49. Bice, Daniel (August 20, 2020). "Members of the state Elections Commission deadlock on whether to let Green Party on presidential ballot". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
  50. Kenny, Caroline (September 11, 2020). "Wisconsin Supreme Court temporarily blocks absentee ballots from being mailed a week before deadline". CNN. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
  51. Saul, Stephanie; Corasaniti, Nick (September 14, 2020). "Wisconsin's Top Court Rules Against Reprinting of Ballots, Avoiding Election Chaos". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 19, 2020.
  52. "Candidates On Ballot By Election" (PDF). Wisconsin Board of Elections. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved September 17, 2020.
  53. "Statement of Canvass for President, Vice President and Presidential Electors - General Election, November 3, 2020" (PDF). Wisconsin Elections Commission. November 2020.
  54. Gilbert, Craig (November 6, 2020). "Where Joe Biden won Wisconsin: Dane County and the Milwaukee County suburbs". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved November 13, 2020.
  55. "County by County Report all offices.xlsx" (Microsoft Excel). Wisconsin Elections Commission. December 2020.
  56. "Wisconsin 2020 President exit polls". www.cnn.com. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  57. Beck, Molly; Marley, Patrick; Spicuzza, Mary (November 5, 2020). "Trump campaign hasn't provided evidence to back up claim of Wisconsin election 'irregularities'". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
  58. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-campaign-request-costly-partial-recount-wisconsin-n1248117
  59. "Wisconsin Certificate of Ascertainment 2020" (PDF). US National Archives. November 30, 2020. Retrieved December 2, 2020.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.